Perspective

Anti-Racism Is Immoral

What if everything you have been conditioned to believe about truth and morality is simply wrong? It is.

“Racism” is a term with many disparate definitions. Indeed, that imprecision is very useful for addicts of the term. It is like having a nine-headed dog guarding the church of diversity at all times. The term is more of a weapon than a word at this point. It doesn’t construct so much as dismantle. It is essentially always and everywhere an underhanded attempt to end all civil debate and declare victory, by people incapable of reasoning above a very rudimentary level.

As far as I can tell the term refers to what are four largely distinct phenomena: 1) the belief that races differ biologically and that those differences matter; 2) the hatred of members of different races; 3) racial prejudice; and 4) racial discrimination.

The first definition, namely the claim about inequality between groups and the import of that inequality, is nothing more than an idea, a truth claim to be precise. Our Cultural Marxist overlords tell us that to believe it is to be a bad person. But that is not true and indeed can’t really be true. Only imbeciles and totalitarians could believe that merely believing this renders one a bad person. What’s more, claiming someone is a bad person for believing this, is what philosophers the world over call a “category error”. You see, this first definition is simply a truth claim about the world. It is not a moral act and thus is not a candidate for moral judgment. For example, if I told you the sky was green, and you told me I was a bad person for believing that, I would reply that you were clearly very confused about something. Now, I may be mistaken about the sky’s color, but I am not a bad person for being mistaken about the sky’s true color. To claim otherwise is to completely misunderstand the subject matter of the discussion; it is to inject matters of morality into matters of reality. We weren’t acting in ways that subjected us to moral judgment. Indeed, we weren’t even discussing moral issues, or what ought to be. We were only discussing how things are or how things aren’t, out there in the world. People who say things like, “racists are evil because they think the races differ in X or Y”, are stupid people. They are people, by and large, who don’t even comprehend what they’re saying, or how utterly idiotic what they’re saying actually is. This is a simple, unmistakable category error. Truth claims about physical/objective reality are not moral (or immoral) acts. They do not possess the basal qualities of moral acts. Moral acts and even moral claims belong to different conceptual categories.

The second definition, hatred, is an extremely rare phenomenon, especially in the modern West. To the extent such hatred even exists anyhow, it is situational and fleeting because hatred is sort of inherently situational and fleeting, and it is also virtually impossible to measure or observe, as hatred is itself nothing more than a feeling. Furthermore, like thoughts/ideas, “hatred” is not something that can be moral or immoral, as it is not an act directed at the outside world, but something entirely personal and internal to an individual. However, since I consider genuine “hatred” of this type to be both extremely rare and outside the knowledge of those who tend to kvetch incessantly about its existence, it is basically a type/definition of racism with minimal import. It is also not so much a valid definition of racism as a smear meant to discredit one’s political opponents. So, while I happen to think that hatred can be both useful and rational in certain instances, again, I don’t wish to harp on this definition for the aforementioned reasons.

Admittedly, racial discrimination taken to its utmost extreme can take a society to rather ugly places (think Nazism). And yet anti-racism, even in a purer, not selectively applied, not fundamentally anti-white form (contrary to how it currently exists and is currently understood), taken to its utmost extreme, is far worse. To take the principles of anti-racism to their logical conclusion is to destroy one’s people and one’s society by design, indeed by necessity. To refuse to distinguish between “us” and “them” in the context of a nation is to abolish the nation itself. To do so in the context or religion is to effectively abolish the religion. If any group wishes to survive, it must take some measures to protect the defining characteristic(s) of the group. Indeed, it must take not only some measures, but adequate measures to do so. To not do so, is to ensure its own demise. What’s more, in the modern world, punctuated by extreme pressures to migrate to wealthier areas, to not do so is to ensure the group’s demise swiftly, via parasitism and invasion. If successful groups do not protect their own interests, they are sure to be swallowed whole by the explosive population growth in populations that wish to share in their success, but which are largely incapable of contributing to it.

Extreme discriminatory racism at least models nature. It at least promotes open competition between groups and celebrates the kinds of successes that nature itself customarily rewards. Anti-racism, on the other hand, is essentially just communism as applied to genes, race, and borders. It is anti-competitive, inherently dysgenic, not progress but anti-progress, and a way for the most worthless peoples on the Earth to gradually consume everything beautiful, precious and decent left on it. Anti-racism is also basically anti-biology. It pretends that evolution magically ceased 250,000 years ago, just because. It is like creationism for leftards, but in reverse. Instead of the Earth magically coming into existence roughly 10,000 years before the present, evolutionary forces magically stopped operating on man a quarter of a million years before the present (when Sub-Saharan Africans and the rest of us split)! Amazing what zealots will believe in the name of ideology/faith.

As has been shown, the term “racism” may be applied to one of four phenomena. The first phenomenon is basically a puerile insult for those who reject race egalitarianism. The problem though, is that race egalitarianism is just patently false, no matter how rabidly leftist totalitarians enforce this pleasant Neo-Lysenkoist fiction. To enforce such a belief, by the way, constitutes nothing less than a war against the truth itself. All racial populations are not equal in their abilities. They are not even remotely equal. Indeed, as data continues to accrue regarding the genetic differences between human populations, even well-known Jewish scientists like David Reich, are beginning to reluctantly concede that race egalitarianism is just intellectually untenable. With that said, even if race egalitarianism was true, which it most certainly isn’t, it still wouldn’t be immoral to believe otherwise. Whereas the second type of racism is simply just a feeling, not subject to moral judgment, and not a particularly good subject for any kind of moral analysis.

The third, prejudice, or more specifically, out-group prejudice, is really just an error/bias in reasoning, or alternatively, a structural/systemic error in reasoning, that is more or less in-built to the human psyche and common to all races and peoples (not just whites). I should say, for what it is worth anyhow, that I do not think prejudice of any variety, properly defined, is something to be celebrated. However, our anti-white overlords don’t properly define it. They typically define prejudice as reaching conclusions about different populations that are not Politically Correct (for example: blacks are disproportionately prone to violence). This is actually an utter bastardization of the concept. “Prejudice” itself is a process-based error. It is not about reaching immoral (not even possible) or improper conclusions (outcome-based), but about employing improper reasoning (process-based) in reaching particular conclusions. Unfortunately, disparate impact jurisprudence shows that even our best legal minds don’t understand this distinction. Thus, properly understood, “prejudice” is not a moral error but an intellectual error. However, since intellectual errors are not themselves commendable or useful, they should be avoided, but not because the conclusions one reaches are somehow morally wrong, but because we should all strive to ascertain the truth via sound processes of reason.

In other words, people (often powerful people in the press and power structure) who argue that “prejudice is immoral”, are again, simply confused. Such types are conflating the bad acts that sometimes flow from prejudice with prejudice itself, as they also commonly conflate bad acts that sometimes flow from racist thoughts, with the thoughts themselves. However, only acts are properly subject to moral judgment, not thoughts or thought processes. Moreover, particular thoughts, like particular ideologies, do not necessarily entail particular acts, and anyone arguing otherwise is simply misinformed and probably reasoning prejudicially themselves. Furthermore, sometimes biases/prejudices can lead us to conclusions anti-racists favor, like false egalitarian conclusions, further elucidating how prejudice is flatly not an outcome-based phenomenon. Thus, any policing of initial truth claims must be made on the basis of their merely being correlated with particular actions or political ideologies, which, in the first place, is just silly, and in the second place, doesn’t get you around the fact that you are still policing ideas, a horrible idea and an inescapably totalitarian practice.

We must also distinguish between prejudice and in-group favoritism, the latter being nothing more than the recognition that the lives, values and interests of one’s own people are worthier of protection. Insofar as one’s own people may be more productive, intelligent or ethical, such a recognition may be based in objective reality, and insofar as like liberties are granted to competing groups, such a position is hardly necessarily rooted in any sort of prejudice (i.e. a biased/flawed reasoning procedure).

Thus, we are left with the final type of racism, racial discrimination, which is really the only type/definition of racism that is even a candidate for moral judgment. Naturally, I would submit to you that a moral value which entails the destruction of the groups that consistently practice it, which anti-racism does, is not a sound moral value at all, but a form of collective insanity.

One of the chief forms of racial discrimination, for example, is exclusion. However, a total lack of exclusion/separation is an invitation to miscegenation, to cultural disintegration via borrowing and mixing, to the rewriting and rereading of one’s history, to the complete loss of identity, etc. Without any barriers to entry into a group, the group simply can not protect itself even marginally (or protect its ways, customs, or genes), let alone survive as a distinct group. It will assimilate the surrounding world or be assimilated into it. In this way, open borders combined with comprehensive anti-discrimination laws, is not merely bad policy, it is implicitly/effectively genocidal. Racial discrimination in the form of exclusion then is a practical defensive measure against incursion into the group, which, in sufficient quantities, entails the disintegration of the traits that define it.

In the modern world, a lack of barriers in both the national and international context, means mass-scale movements of people from highly unsuccessful regions to highly successful regions. After all, why would successful peoples migrate to shitholes? Therefore, in the modern world, we are not only talking about the eradication of the group via total transformation, but also a total transformation that invariably involves moral and civilizational decline. Thus, a total commitment to anti-discrimination by its very nature is destructive, but in its current form it is also socially, morally, culturally and genetically regressive. To refuse to discriminate is to refuse to be a people at all. A people that adopts such a moral value as its cardinal moral value, and aggressively applies that moral value against its own coethnics, is actively genociding itself as a people. An absolute prohibition on out-group discrimination is to the group what poison is to the individual.

Now, if you think turning prosperous, mirthful, and peaceful parts of the globe into miserable hellholes is a righteous, wonderful, and moral thing to do, it is certainly your right to be a retard, but it is our position in the Alt-Right that you are woefully deluded. Some degree of racial discrimination, in some contexts, is not only morally acceptable, but morally mandatory. Out-group discrimination is the nourishment upon which peoples and civilizations survive, and dare I say, thrive. Any group which refuses to engage in it, is simply not long for this world. Such a group is destined to be replaced by groups that do take their own group interests seriously, and enthusiastically discriminate against out-group members, like non-white, anti-white leftists and Mohammedans. Indeed, this is precisely what is happening in the West today. Our Cultural Marxist overlords go further of course, and inform us that whites aren’t even allowed a racial identity! But pray tell, how could a group possibly survive if its members must remain wholly unconscious of their own membership in it?

Thus, of the four variant types/definitions of the term racism, only one is really subject to moral judgment at all, and as we can see, it is not an easy intellectual task to defend the wholesale rejection of it (i.e. to advocate for absolute and unqualified anti-racism), unless you think peoples don’t have the right to remain peoples. We can thus rather comfortably conclude that a complete ban on racial discrimination is simply not morality or coextensive with morality. Morality proper must lie somewhere between racial discrimination in all contexts and racial discrimination in none.

158
Leave a Reply

avatar
26 Comment threads
132 Thread replies
1 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
27 Comment authors
GordonZeraJohn Bruce LeonardSorenSchwarzwaldQwerty Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
After Democracy
Guest
After Democracy

That’s nice, but the left’s entire gameplan is to ignore all those distinctions you just made. If they believed in ethics or reasoning they wouldn’t believe in equality to begin with. For the white left, racism is a bludgeon to use against the right. For minorities, racism is a way to claim injury and therefore self-interest (which at least makes sense from their perspective). The question is, how do we take that away from them?

Nova Morium
Guest
Nova Morium

Anti-Racism is Immoral………

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

Is that your phrase for the week?

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

Wrongo boyo. As a minority myself (Mestizo) born into an upper middle class family, I can’t honestly say I’ve been subjected to much racism…my contempt for your ideals is based on principle. White liberals (bless their hearts) are a lot like Judy Hopps from Zootopia.

Nova Morium
Guest
Nova Morium

Why do you obsessively concern yourself with a Pro-White Movement then?

Weird…..

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

Your movement first came to my attention when Milo penned that article in 2016 about your movement. Then you were trolling everywhere, even YouTube, especially YouTube. Then Hillary gave her speech and Trump won and brought Steve Bannon with him. Ever since then I’ve been following the Alt-Right and its related movements.

Very weird…..

Albino
Guest
Albino

Because the AltRight is appealing to everybody, does not matter race or religion. Bolivia, with its Inca national socialism, is an ethno-State. Turkey is an ethno-State. Israel… of course, most Muslim-Arab countries are ethno-Sates. Also Butan, Nepal, Japan… and of course Mexico is a mestizo ethno-State, and Guatemala, and Venezuela is already a mestizo ethno-State after expelling most of the white population who is arriving to Spain in massive numbers. Cuba is a fucking mulato ethno-State after expelling whites to Florida and Spain. Cuban regime was very aggressive to the Catholic Church but encouraged Voodoo, like in Haiti (another Etno-State).… Read more »

RestoreSanity
Guest
RestoreSanity

Doesn’t matter if it’s ultimately immoral. The mythology is righteous and is used effectively by the state to enforce policies. I say mythology because liberalism is very much a religion at this point. A cult based on violent ‘liberation’ of ‘victims’. From the jacobins of the 18th century to the trannies of the 21st century. That destructive progress won’t stop until it’s consumed its host(s).

Nova Morium
Guest
Nova Morium

Definitely a Religion…….

Agreed…..

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

The first liberals in the West were definitely Christians. Many were Catholics. Indeed, it was a Catholic who wrote Utopia and the noble Jesuits were perhaps the first true leftist organization economically speaking. Many white liberals today are atheists, but I am pleased to say we Mestizos have not forgotten our religion.

Nova Morium
Guest
Nova Morium

We in the Alt-Right don’t want our Descedants to be Mestizos or Mulattos…….

It has NOTHING to do with Hate………

It has EVERYTHING to do with Love and Survival……..

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

If Nosy Nova is so fixated on her descendants……

Then maybe she should have had kids…..

But few men desire an old crone for a wife…..

Most whites would trade her for an Asian gal any day…..

And so she project her bitterness……

Pondering her woe……

Nova Morium
Guest
Nova Morium

Projecting your Angst……

Nothing else…..

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

You plagiarize me……

I am not impressed…..

Albionic+American
Guest
Albionic+American

The Alt Right’s world view is pro-white humanism, in that we have a vision of human flourishing and the good life in line with the humanist tradition, but oriented towards white people’s interests.

We just reject the universalist ethics that came out of the Enlightenment because it conflicts with man’s nature and therefore doesn’t work in the real world.

Lexi
Guest
Lexi

I agree that universalism is a deadly poison. As the author says, to refuse to discriminate is to refuse to be a people, that is, to self-anhililate. While Enlightenment attitudes may have gotten us into this mess, those attitudes are not keeping us here.

Reason can and does err, but it also self-corrects. Religious fanaticism cannot self-correct. Cultural Marxism is a religious fanaticism, impervious to rational analysis based on evidence. The cure will always and everywhere be the hair of the dog that bit’ya.

B.Smith
Guest
B.Smith

Just a few points: “Admittedly, racial discrimination taken to its utmost extreme can take a society to rather ugly places (think Nazism).” Why do you say this? NSDAP Germany was beautiful, and peaceful, what is ugly are the shabbos goyim traitor “leaders” of so called Western countries that betrayed their people to the Jews evil plans by ganging up and making war on (Not to mention helping the Jews to consolidate their Globo-homo-NWO-death-state and perpetrating the Holy-Hoax), destroying the best hope of the white race in that century: National Socialism, racial awareness, and a clear eye on the Jew. Why… Read more »

Matar Judios
Guest
Matar Judios

What an idiocy! Do you think that Blacks in South Africa are bothered at all that “scientific studies show that Blacks are inherently less intelligent than the Whites”? “F the Whites, it’s our country” was/is their rallying cry. And even though I am White (though not a White South African) I fully sympathise with their perspective. The IQ research is totally irrelevant for our cause. But don’t tell that to Juden(knechts) like John Engelman 😉

RestoreSanity
Guest
RestoreSanity

You sympathize with their perspective? South Africa isn’t their country. They colonized it just like the dutch.

Qwerty
Guest
Qwerty

He’s saying fuck big brain justifications, they aren’t primary motivators. The only thing that matters is will to power, the will to conquer, exist and dominate irregardless of facts and morality. So yes, if the blacks have the will to expel the Boer who’d rather appeal to Jewish Internationalist sympathies than dominate through force of arms, then yes, they frankly deserve to get fucked. South Africa will become a black country if they simply take it – they understand this, while whites are too busy searching for moral justifications in abstract claims. This is why we are getting fucked on… Read more »

PhilliusMcGraw
Guest
PhilliusMcGraw

anti racism is inimical to our survival as a race!

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

No it’s not. You are free to marry a white woman and have white children and have white friends. Most of us anti-racists don’t mind. It’s when you start trying to force your will on others that we start having problems with you.

But thank you for using inimical in your sentence. My English is pretty good, but I appreciate learning new words. 😉

Matar Judios
Guest
Matar Judios

“anti-racism” seems to be a doctrine of sorts… Would you merry somebody merely to fulfil a doctrine?That seems perverse to me.

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

If I married someone it would be because I loved her personality and yes, appearance. I am 90% likely to marry a fellow Mexican, but I’ve been attracted to white girls before.

Matar Judios
Guest
Matar Judios

Then you seem to be “normal”. But to be a “saint” think also at the “appearance” of your children with a White woman.

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

Why ae you asking me to think of the appearance of biracial childre? I do not get this question.

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

*are

Albino
Guest
Albino

Mestizo women -with exceptions such Barbara Carrera, Jennifer López and Bianca Jagger- tend to be ugly.
Shakira and Salma Hayek are no mestizo but Arabic.
Unactracctive races shouldn´t breed.
Attractive races should breed much. It is a pity the birth rates in the Baltic are going down while ((they)) want to fill the three countries with apes.

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

LOL You must be blind if you can’t see that Mestizo women are sexy Goddesses deserving of adoration and devotion in every manner possible. I shall forgive your heresy today simply because you praised Mexico City women in the comments down below. 😉

Albino
Guest
Albino

Sorry to say this but when I was in the DF I could´t find mestizo women attractive. I did find white women there VERY attractive.
But I understand you find them sexy. That is a healthy “racist” response.
The benefits of diversity: I always find, as well, American white women very attractive and I think the reason is due to the heavy intra-European mix. Also, there is something good about the fast food: the fast food makes American women a little chubby which I find adorable.

Gordon
Guest
Gordon

Sorry. I was born in the 50s, grew up in the 60s and 70s when almost all whites were quite thin by today’s standards. I’m not into fat asses on women. That’s a black thing.

Clark Kent
Guest
Clark Kent

When all the shit you want to happen comes to pass, Mexico is still going to be Mexican.
In your grand equation it’s going to be white people who lose out.

I thought you were a delusional white shitlib. You being an beaner ingrate at least makes sense.

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

I would believe the same things if I were white. If my demeanor led you to believe I was white, then that’s more proof anti-racist ideals are correct.

Spraguer
Guest
Spraguer

“I would believe the same things if I were white.”
No, you wouldn’t. Anti-racism is overwhelmingly a situational ideal. People adopt it when they stand to gain from it. If Africans were moving en masse to Mexico & you were living there, you wouldn’t be an anti-racist at all.
Anti-racism is always more popular amongst those who have nothing to lose by adopting it.

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

“If Africans were moving en masse to Mexico & you were living there, you wouldn’t be an anti-racist at all.”

I’ve contemplated this before.

Interesting how you didn’t use whites or Asians as your example, though. Probably because you calculated I wouldn’t mind them.

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

Sometimes instinct is better left suppressed.

Spraguer
Guest
Spraguer

LOL. Well, I used “Africans” because it is sufficiently analogous to what is happening to formerly white regions.
My point is that it would be morally defensible to try to protect one’s national traditions, genes, group identity, etc. irrespective of who was coming in.
However, when the people coming in are less intelligent, less skilled, more violent, etc. it’s especially absurd & unconscionable to adhere to an absolutistic form of antiracism.

Albino
Guest
Albino

This is extremely interesting from an the point of view of anthropology. Well, then, when you are in the DF, you feel more connected to Zócalo Sq. or to Tenochtitlán? If you feel more connected to Zócalo Sq. it means the Spanish blood in your system is winning the cultural struggle. Or maybe is Tenochtitlán which is winning. Or maybe you feel connected to both, the same way. In any case, in a way, it cultural enrichment but in other way it is an struggle. And if you feel you want to breed with a white Mexican woman I guess… Read more »

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

Most “white” Mexicans have some Mestizo blood in them. There are countless “white” Mexicans with Mestizo-looking children (despite both parents being “white”) At any rate, I do not prefer one to the other.

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

But Albino, didn’t ya know every white woman secretly wants to have intercourse with a black or Mestizo, even if she’s already married? Andrew Anglin and Weev say it’s true so surely it must be! 😛

Albino
Guest
Albino

I know, but -usually- they don´t want to breed with them.
This is the racial alpha fux beta bux.

Gordon
Guest
Gordon

Mexico — and all other Latin American countries — are far more “racist” than the United States. Societies are stratified along racial lines. Spanish whites are almost always the political, business and social elites. Mestizos are higher in social and economic status based upon the amount of white Spanish blood they have. Pure-blooded Natives are always at the bottom of the society… unless, of course, we are dealing with a country that also has Negro blood in the mix. This complicates the matter somewhat.

Matar Judios
Guest
Matar Judios

“marry” not “merry”, moron!

Spraguer
Guest
Spraguer

Human beings are biological specimens with strong sexual desires. You can’t force groups of people together via force of law & expect them to remain distinct peoples. Look at Brazil or Syria. If you import enough of a foreign people, especially a racially distinct foreign people, you are basically certain to transform that society greatly & the dominant groups that define it. As enough time passes, you will essentially end up with a new primary populational group. The former majority race will lose its numbers, power, & many of its essential characteristics. The best way, really the only way to… Read more »

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

Spraguer:
“how about when you drove innocent business owners out of business via force of law merely for wanting to serve who they pleased?”

Also Spraguer:
“you guys can’t even win an argument without exiling your opponents & banning their words & ideas.”

We’ve gone over this before, hypocrite. If it is okay for physical businesses to refuse to offer their services to people based on race, then it certainly is okay for social media businesses to refuse their services to people based on ideology.

Spraguer
Guest
Spraguer

Yeah, we went over it & you lost the debate. 1) The would-be totalitarianism of the Alt-Right is no match for the actual totalitarianism of the Cultural Marxist left. 2) There is a huge, huge difference between vast multinational corporations that are effectively common carriers & backwoods cafes! Indeed, I’ve never taken the position that for essential services businesses should be able to racially discriminate. Totalitarianism is defined not merely by the rule itself but by the degree to which you are willing to take it! The way the left terrorizes poor, nobody racists is fundamentally totalitarian. Holding Big Tech,… Read more »

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

“The way the left terrorizes poor, nobody racists is fundamentally totalitarian.” Get off your high horse. You guys love doxxing leftists as much as Antifa loves doxxing you. It just so happens that the center left runs social media companies. I study history. The far right is just as willing, if not more, to use force on its enemies. “why is it OK for vast multinationals to discriminate on ideological grounds? Are not ideas & freedom of conscience more essential rights & liberties, especially in a democracy, than your anti-racist Marxist scruples?” If I moderated Twitter, Jared Taylor would never… Read more »

Spraguer
Guest
Spraguer

1) I’m talking about what the left does now. You’re talking about what the right did at certain points throughout history. The Cultural Marxist left is in power & has been for a long time in America. I do not doubt that some rightists would do the same if they could. But they can’t. So again, no comparison. We live in a time & a place, you know? In that time & place, Alt-Right would-be totalitarianism can not hold a candle to the left-wing totalitarianism which surrounds us & dominates our lives. 2) Rightist doxxing is far more limited &… Read more »

Matar Judios
Guest
Matar Judios

True, but with the exception of Jews. They seem to flourish in mongrelized countries.

Spraguer
Guest
Spraguer

Because they A) Separate, B) Exclude, C) Discriminate, D) Aggregate & segregate wealth, & E) Possess a very strong tribal identity. If the Jews played by their own Cultural Marxist rules they’d have undone themselves long ago.

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

Over 40% of American Jews are married to a non-Jew. That’s higher than the number of whites in an interracial marriage. They assimilate.

Spraguer
Guest
Spraguer

1) They do not assimilate. In fact the opposite has obviously occurred. Jews never assimilated into America. America assimilated to the Jews. When the Jews acquired sufficient political power they simply made America in their image. That was a bout 50 years ago now. 2) Even Jews who marry-out often have their would-be spouses convert (Ivanka). Those who don’t still often retain a very strong Jewish identity & pass it on to their offspring. Their half-Jewish offspring want to enjoy the perquisites of Jewish discrimination, ethnit networks, exclusion, elitism, etc. & so often identify as Jews despite their non-Semitic heritage.… Read more »

Albino
Guest
Albino

I would shag Sarah Silverman in a blink. She is a Sephardian Jewish princess.

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

Sarah Silverman is lovely. She reminds me of one of my first female friends.

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

On Stormfront, a favorite tactic of anti-racist pranksters is to pretend to be a white nationalist and then to post anonymous pictures of beautiful Jewish women while pretending they are white. “THIS is what we are fighting to preserve!” the real racists reply, misty eyed.

😀 😀 😀

Nova Morium
Guest
Nova Morium

I’m sure everyone was Fully Pranked…….

???

Nova Morium
Guest
Nova Morium

Thanks for admitting you’re not Alt-Right……

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

You’re welcome.

Nova Morium
Guest
Nova Morium

Ding……Ding…….Ding…….

TKO……..

Dr. Doom
Guest
Dr. Doom

Gee that’s sweet Babylonian. I’ll keep that in mind when these pet projects make you into Kosher Bacoin Sandwiches and Soylent Green Crackers.

Gordon
Guest
Gordon

I take it we are just not “free” to have our own nation.

Matar Judios
Guest
Matar Judios

No brainer as “anti-racism” is merely anti-White racism. Unfortunately many no brains among the White people…

Albino
Guest
Albino

http://genarin.net/matarjudios.html

In León, Spain, “matar judíos” is an expressionn which means going out to drink lemonade in taverns.

Albino
Guest
Albino

Compulsory vasectomies for every non white crossing Río Grande or the Med. You don´t want to get vasectomised? OK: get back.

Nova Morium
Guest
Nova Morium

Anyone see that Vile Jewish Subhuman Piece of Garbage on Display at the WHCD last night??

Michelle Wolf……

Pure Talmudic Attacks on White Goy Sarah Huckabee Sanders…….

What do these Jews think they’re accomplishing with this??

They’re just Validating the JQ, Red-Pilling more Whites, and making their Demographic even more Despised…….

Their Arrogance knows no Bounds………

Nova Morium
Guest
Nova Morium

(((Michelle Wolf))):

‘Sarah Sanders’ is the ‘Uncle Tom to White Women”…….

Beyond Chutzpah…..

Spraguer
Guest
Spraguer

It is quite unreal. This non-white, anti-white Semitic communist thinks she’s qualified to judge who is an “Uncle Tom to white women”.

Nova Morium
Guest
Nova Morium

They’ve been getting away with it Scot Free for Years…….

Until now…….

The Alt-Right is already making Major Headway into the Culture…….

The Alt-Right is exposing Jewish Anti-White Sociopathological Behavior on a Mass Scale…….

I believe it is forcing the Jewish Community to start Policing their own…….

I could be wrong but there seems to be a Noticeable Shift…..

Nova Morium
Guest
Nova Morium

Well…..well……well……..

(((Margaret Talev)))……

https://twitter.com/margarettalev/status/990314174126415878

Works for (((Bloomberg)))…….

WHCA President……..

Hired (((Michelle Wolf)))…….

Kevin MacDonald and the rest of the Alt-Right just believe in a Strange Conspiracy Theory…….

Says (((Steven Pinker))) and (((Nathan Cofnas)))……..

Ha!!!

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

Michelle is an anti-Trump liberal woman and Sarah Sanders is Trump’s spokeswoman. That’s where the animosity comes from. If Sarah were a Jew who liked Trump, Michelle would hate her the same.

Nova Morium
Guest
Nova Morium

Uh…….

NOPE……….

President Trumps Election united Jews from the Far Left and the Neocon Republican Faction against him……..

Why?

They saw the Rise of the Alt-Right and Trump’s Election linked……..

And they banded together as a Tribe to preserve their Jewish Supremacist Privileged Hegemony over America’s Power Centers of Influence……

Some to maintain Wars for Israel…….

Some to maintain White America’s Degeneracy and Degradation into Minority Status……..

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

Most American Jews oppose Trump, but most Israel Jews love, love, love him.

The thing with Michelle and Sarah is a liberal/conservative thing.

Nova Morium
Guest
Nova Morium

“Jews must work with our Muslim brothers against the Old ‘White’ Europe…”

https://twitter.com/William__XIII/status/990676301370585088

There is NOTHING that you or anyone else can say that will move me back into the Wilderness of Blindness where the JQ isn’t Relevant to White Identity/Survival……..

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

Jews disagree with each other all the time, like every race and religion. Denial of this makes you blind, not enlightened.

Spraguer
Guest
Spraguer

That is quite true, they do.
But they rarely do on one issue: their own racial interests.
On that one concern, their opinions, actions & attitudes are remarkably uniform.

SorenSchwarzwald
Plus Member
SorenSchwarzwald

Can we talk about composition sometime?

Shlomo Shekelberg
Guest
Shlomo Shekelberg

I’ll call the SPLC and the ADL on y’a !

Nova Morium
Guest
Nova Morium

Anti-Racism is Immoral……..

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

Stuff it Nova.

Nova Morium
Guest
Nova Morium

Joe……

Go find your People……….

It’s not your Fault for what your Parents chose……..

But, we in the Alt-Right reject that Choice……..

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

Nosy Nova…

I go….

When I please….

Get over it….

Nova Morium
Guest
Nova Morium

Or Stay……

But, you still can NEVER be White or Alt-Right……

And that is a MORALLY Righteous Position……..

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

Who said I wanted to be white or Alt-Right…..

If you paid attention……

You would know I’m this websites Resident Lefty…..

Matar Judios
Guest
Matar Judios

It may be immoral but anti-Semitism is moral for sure!

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

Anti-Semitism is immoral, but anti-Zionism is moral.

Matar Judios
Guest
Matar Judios

LOL. I like your humour. Are you a Jew, btw? They are the only people in the USA that can be “humours” (at our expense, without being “racists”…)

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

I am 90% certain I don’t have any Jewish blood. The only reason I’m not 100% is because even Christopher Cantwell has .6 Jewish ancestry. But Jews are the Masters of the Universe (in your pov anyway), so I don’t mind much if you think I’m one.

P.S. My grandfather was fairly Anti-Semitic.

Albino
Guest
Albino

I am both pro Semite and pro Israel. I guess I have a lot of Jewish DNA like most of Spaniards.
Most of ((them)) remained in the Peninsula after the “Expulsión” in 1492. They just converted into Catholicism. They had that option. Very practical people.

SZHkm
Guest
SZHkm

That is what Euro leftist say.
I always found anti Israelian speech from the Euro lefties very disgusting.

Albino
Guest
Albino

Ooops! Comment bellow is mine. I wrote the clue in “name”.

John Bruce Leonard
Editor

An excellent analysis from Mr. Spraguer of one of the most tendentious fabrications in our entire fat contemporary lexicon of invented, hollow, perverse neologisms. Very well done indeed.

Spraguer
Guest
Spraguer

Thanks, man. I really like this one too. It’s a bit long & ponderous, but I like it anyway. Probably shouldn’t have written it during my 3L (final year of law school) exam week, but LOL. Per veritatem vis, I guess.

Chris__
Plus Member
Chris__

Just yesterday, Richard started a fund-raiser for help with his legal expenses related to the terroristic “lawfare” lawsuits that are coming at him (as a result of his being involved with the ‘Unite the Right’ rally). You can find that link here:
https://www.fundedjustice.com/Spencer-legal?ref=tw_87FGG2_ab_0GSQtv3nB6q0GSQtv3nB6q

Klanarchist
Guest
Klanarchist

We have to be able to articulate the positive life-enhancing attributes of homogeneous societies. It is good to document how diversity kills on so many levels, but we need to be able to convey the superiority of homogeneous societies–why having an identity and sense of belonging is what makes us fully human. Much of this is instinctual and seemingly ineffable. With the confidence that comes with ready arguments and responses to people who insist that racism is evil we’ll be able to persuade people to discard the cult of diversity.

Hansfrank
Guest
Hansfrank

I would start with the right to be left alone and not have your wealth extracted by state force. Add free association and the rest largely takes care of itself.

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

If being left alone is all you want then you should become a libertarian.

Nova Morium
Guest
Nova Morium

Anti-Racism is Immoral……..

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

Nope. Try again, cupcake.

Albino
Guest
Albino

Joe, for breeding you prefer a mestizo woman, a black one, a white one a yellow one?

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

I could fall in love with people from any race. Admittedly I am more attracted to whites and Mestizos than I am to blacks, on average. The first girl I remember being attracted to was Lydia from Beetlejuice. She was whiter than white. I am far more likely to marry a Mestizo from Mexico City, though.

Albino
Guest
Albino

That is respecting your race and culture. Mexico DF is a wonderful city.
I like so much white Mexican women by the way, they look like Spanish but they have that beautiful Mexican accent. Only a problem about them: the man has to pay everything all the time. I don´t like that. I am very feminist: 50/50 is fair.

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

She’s very attractive. Women speaking Spanish fluently is a major turn. Also, most white Mexicans probably have some Mestizo blood in them.

Lexi
Guest
Lexi

We tried that, you lot called us racist, anyway, and not without reason. We want to be left alone, with our own.

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

Lexi, you’ve stated on other threads that you have a white husband and white children. You already are with “your own.” Did minorities and leftists storm your wedding to steal your wedding ring? Are leftists throwing rocks at your windows or abducting your children to send them to Antifa training camps? No? Then please tell me how we are oppressing you. Did some Antifa call you a racist? Get thicker skin. When I was a teenager I was called a freak for participating in the punk and gothic scene. But you don’t see me calling for a Gothic country, right?… Read more »

Spraguer
Guest
Spraguer

No, they just stormed our communities via government forced integration. They stormed her wedding as well, via anti-discrimination laws in hiring & employment. Half the staff was probably non-white. They stormed our country when millions of them came pouring over the borders in defiance of our laws. Yes, leftists, especially non-white ones, would be throwing rocks at her window actually, if they knew about her politics. Being called a freak is nothing compared to the persecution white people face in America today, merely on account of expressing pride in their history & heritage. Many of us are being fired, deplatformed,… Read more »

Lexi
Guest
Lexi

And then there’s the fact that I have to worry about their future as a minority. Aren’t we constantly told how terrible it is to be a minority? Yet, we are irrational to resist this for our children. The unspoken assumption is that only White majorities are threatening and therefore immoral. Other kind she of majorities are perfectly fine. Spraguer, I am going to address this comment specifically to you, and you may do with it as you wish. I trust your judgment. I have a hard time understanding why Joe is allowed to post here. He’s not White, and… Read more »

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

Because, Lexi, this sites has recently published a bunch of articles proclaiming the Alt-Right to be the leader of the free speech movement. So banning people would be hypocritical. That being said, it’s highly possible I get banned. We shall see.

P.S. Spraguer is not a moderator. He writes articles. Not sure why you’re whining to him, you triggered ❄.

Spraguer
Guest
Spraguer

1) Joe is the resident pinata. Every time he gets whacked the universe is a slightly sweeter place. And he gets whacked a lot. 2) I have absolutely no inclination to ban him, even if I could. I really don’t see him as a nuisance at all. I rather like to debate people who disagree with me, both those who do it well & especially those who do it poorly. 3) I sympathize with your position regarding the rights & interests of the “other”. The white race is far too solicitous of the rights & interests of our racial enemies.… Read more »

Shlomo Shekelberg
Guest
Shlomo Shekelberg

How’s the rape to death while the kids hang by the neck going ?
Need help ? 100℅ Kosher.

Chris__
Plus Member
Chris__

Testing out this idea (thanks to dj1969 for suggesting it)….
IF YOU’D RATHER LISTEN THAN READ, HERE IS A LINK TO A ‘TEXT-TO-SPEECH,’ MACHINE-READ VERSION OF THIS ARTICLE:
http://www.mediafire.com/file/sdog3ts3j1dt82y/Anti-Rac_IsImmoral.mp3
* I believe comprehension/retention rates are much higher when someone reads something (as opposed to listens to it). For that reason I strongly recommend always reading the article first!

Nova Morium
Guest
Nova Morium

While I feel ZERO White Guilt regarding anything that our Cultural Marxist Overlords try to Brainwash Force Feed me with on a Daily Basis…….

It’s very nice and refreshing to be reminded with such Powerful Intellectual Force……..

That the Alt-Right maintains the Moral High Ground……..

100% Without a Doubt……..

What would be the Pavlovian Left’s Response??

“You’re a Nazi White Supremacist!”……..

“They are people, by and large, who don’t even comprehend what they’re saying, or how utterly idiotic what they’re saying actually is.”

Exoplanet 1701
Guest
Exoplanet 1701

After reading the WN novel, “Hold Back This Day”, I now know the endgame of white genocide. And I also now know the solution, after reading the WN novel, “Eternity Beach”.

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

Sorry to break it to you kiddo, but those are works of fiction.

Gordon
Guest
Gordon

Excellent piece. I shared it on Facebook.

Zera
Guest
Zera

Interesting read. However, I do not get why group achievement protection entails leaving other races out. Seems to me that success is measured based on values such as safety, freedom, agreement on moral values, prosperity, willingness to learn and to contribute and maybe amount of personal living space. If those are the traits that made a society successful than those should be protected and a barrier erected against their deterioration. Race does not come into the picture directly. Now from some races there might be a larger percentage of people not matching the barrier criteria than from another, but that… Read more »

Spraguer
Guest
Spraguer

1) Are values the only thing worth preserving? Not really. What about genes, aesthetics, spirit, etc? And anyhow you can’t “preserve” the values of a people whilst demographically transforming that people. This is an absurd notion. 2) Even if a tiny % of certain out-group populations are a good cultural fit, will their offspring be a good cultural fit? Not likely. People are drawn to the cultures of their tribes. This is a direct consequence of out-group bias. It will always be a minority of blacks & Arabs that accepts & adopts white culture. 3) “That’s not because of skin… Read more »

Albino
Guest
Albino

“Anti-racism is inmoral” is such a provocative, powerful slogan.
This days when is the 50th anniversary of Paris May 68, is perfect.

Chris__
Plus Member
Chris__

The guys released a new podcast episode few hours ago, direct link below:
Title: April 29, 2018 – DACA and Judicial Tyranny, Kanye and Cosby, and Incel Intifada
https://api.spreaker.com/download/episode/14661227/arp_29_april_2018.mp3

Cccl
Guest
Cccl

Joe gotti another anti white. Pro blending out whites.

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

Speak English, boy.

Karl XII
Guest
Karl XII

This only touches on tip of the iceberg though and never gets to the root of the matter. There’s a thorough analysis of nationalist ethics in a new essay called “One’s Nation as the Highest Truth: The German Ethical Revolution, 1800–1945” on Counter-Currents.
https://www.counter-currents.com/2018/04/ones-nation-as-the-highest-truth/

Ash
Guest
Chris__
Plus Member
Chris__

IF YOU’D RATHER LISTEN THAN READ, HERE IS A LINK TO A ‘TEXT-TO-SPEECH,’ MACHINE-READ VERSION OF THIS ARTICLE:
http://www.mediafire.com/file/sdog3ts3j1dt82y/Anti-Rac_IsImmoral.mp3
* I believe comprehension/retention rates are significantly higher when someone reads something (as opposed to listens to it). For that reason I strongly recommend always reading the article first! Thanks.

Nova Morium
Guest
Nova Morium

Anti-Racism is Immoral……..

And that Picture…….

I feel the Potential for some Great Meme Magick happening here………

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

Boo…

Hoo….

Hoo…

Matar Judios
Guest
Matar Judios

That picture is merely a beautiful woman, for your education.

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

She is indeed beautiful.

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

Someone was none too pleased that I called a white woman beautiful. Lol 😀

Charley
Guest
Charley

for all the statements that Racism Is Immoral; the one ques. that people never seem to ask
is what if Racists just want to be Racists because that is their belief system and their bedrock
principle ??

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

This is circular reasoning, Charley. Everything that a person believes is part of their belief system. Obviously racism is a bedrock principle to racists. Anti-racism (egalitarianism) is one of my bedrock principles. Yet here we are.

Nova Morium
Guest
Nova Morium

Anti-Racism is Immoral…….

Spraguer
Guest
Spraguer

A commitment to some limited conception of justice is usually admirable.
A commitment to egalitarianism is essentially always a commitment to totalitarianism. It is communism by another name.
There is no way to eliminate inequality without also eliminating freedom.
Furthermore, “equality” has no inherent value. It’s like building a chair with 4 legs which are all exactly 2 inches in height. Sure, the legs are all equal, but the chair has no use as a chair.
You’ve selected the wrong bedrock values. That’s what it comes down to.

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

“A commitment to egalitarianism is essentially always a commitment to totalitarianism.”

Wrong. I do not demand that the government do anything to enforce egalitarianism other than stopping bigots from harming those they deem inferior to them. If a white man wants to marry a white woman, that’s fine. If a white wants to move to an all white neighborhood, fine. If a white attacks his black neighbor, then that is where the government must punish him. That is not totalitarianism.

Spraguer
Guest
Spraguer

A) So then you don’t support the Civil Rights Act. The Civil Rights Act prohibits far more than people “harming” those they deem inferior. Far, far more. Indeed, anti-discrimination laws are not premised on “harm”. Those who are discriminated against in most contexts are in no worse position than they were in prior. B) You are confusing “racists” with “bigots”. I’m a racist. “Bigots” are people that are intolerant of those with different opinions, like the regressive left, & the Zuckerbergs & Dorseys of the world. C) If you don’t support a robust version of egalitarianism, then you clearly value… Read more »

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

There are different types of egalitarians just as there are different types of feminists. Women who want the right to vote and women who want to criminalize cat calls are both feminists, but very different types of feminists.

I am an egalitarian based on the definition given by the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Egalitarian doctrines maintain that all humans are equal in fundamental worth or social status.

Spraguer
Guest
Spraguer

That version of egalitarianism is hardly a moral/political value. It’s more of a moral premise & basically a truth claim.
Anyhow, what it entails politically is essentially nothing.
Part of the point of my recent articles has been to show that reaching extreme conclusions via such premises is unwise & morally untenable.
Do you believe your govt owes the same things to homeless Americans as homeless Eritreans?
Do you flip a coin when your own child is starving to decide if you should give your last can of corn to him or a hungry Bangladeshi child?

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

“Anyhow, what it entails politically is essentially nothing.” Politically, it entails a lot of things. For instance: 1) Jim Crow laws were evil. Miscegenation should be permitted and biracial children should never feel the force of the government on their backs for being what they are. 2) Blacks can run for President. (off topic, but imagine how many wars America would be involved in now if John McCain had beaten Obama. America would have toppled Syria and would probably have an army of 50,000 in Iran.) 3. Apartheid was wrong, and stealing from the white farmers is wrong. 4. Same… Read more »

Spraguer
Guest
Spraguer

1) “Miscegenation should be permitted”. Should it? What about in a nation explicitly premised upon racial identity? For example, it isn’t exactly permitted/recognized in certain nations (Israel, S Arabia). These nations don’t recognize interracial/interreligious marriages. What about in the citizenship context, when one of your own citizens reproduces with an out-ethnic outsider/foreigner? Should that half-white child receive automatic citizenship in a white ethnostate? Again, placing limits on out-group marriage & breeding is one of the means populations use to protect their interests, identity & existence as a group. 2) The white minority in South Africa was insane to opt for… Read more »

Clark Kent
Guest
Clark Kent

So then why do we never hear you argue on our behalf that we should eliminate affirmative action, forced diversity quotas, and mass immigration when the democratic majority rejects it?

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

Who said anything about a democratic majority? I certainly did not.

Nova Morium
Guest
Nova Morium

Your Parents made a Choice………

And Created you……..

It’s not the Alt-Right’s Fault that we Reject that Choice……..

If I was you then I would hate the Alt-Right……..

But, your Existential Angst can only be Alleviated by Finding your People………

Not by Attacking us…….

We want White People to Survive long into the Future……….

We’re not Sorry……..

We did NOTHING Wrong……….

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

If you did nothing wrong……

Then pray tell why you are so bitter, Nova……

I see right through you, cupcake……

Nova Morium
Guest
Nova Morium

Joe……

What do you want the Broader Alt-Right to do to Alleviate your Identity Crisis??

If I disappeared…….

The Alt-Right will continue to Grow…….

And continue to Exacerbate your Psychological Tensions and Anxiety…….

That’s inside YOU…

Not me……

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

Nova…..

I don’t have a say in what the broader Alt-Right does…..

I am here to debate and to troll…..

Your fake concern for my health is touching…..

But my only mental issues are a little OCD and occasional brain fog…..

Neither of which are caused by you……

So would you kindly……..

settle down cupcake……

Nova Morium
Guest
Nova Morium

This week in the Rich Upper West Side of NY……

Ashkenazi Jews who probably all voted for Hillary Clinton………

Hate President Trump……..

Hate us in the Alt-Right……..

Probably donate to Organizations wishing to Destroy the Alt-Right through Frivolous Lawsuits……

Protested loudly against the School Board for wanting to bring Poorly Performing Blacks into their Schools to achieve the Blessings of Diversity and Equality…….

Ha!!

I don’t know what Colored Pill that is but it’s definitely not a Black One……..

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

Gee…..

I wonder why a Jew would hate the Alt-Right……

I wonder……

I wonder……

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

“However, a total lack of exclusion/separation is an invitation to miscegenation, to cultural disintegration via borrowing and mixing,”

It’s okay to be biracial! 😛 😛 😛 😀 😉

Nova Morium
Guest
Nova Morium

You’re not Bi-Racial……

You’re a New Race………

Go find and be with your People……….

We are not your People……..

It’s OK to be You……..

I agree……

It’s not your Fault for what your Parents did……..

But, it’s not our Fault either…….

We wouldn’t have Created you……….

We don’t Hate you for what you are……..

We don’t wish any Harm to come to you……….

But, we want White Women to Procreate with White Men in Monogamous Traditional Relationships to create White Families that Sustain our Race………

Anti-Racism is Immoral………

Shlomo Shekelberg
Guest
Shlomo Shekelberg

((( Monogamous ))) Probably why Ali and his 4 wives are outbreeding you goy.

Nova Morium
Guest
Nova Morium

One Yehuda Finkelstein is Enough…….

Get your own Shtick, Moron……..

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

It’s not okay Nosy Nova……

To be as jealous as you are…..

Of white liberal women with careers and families…..

Just because you have neither…..

Does not mean you will make yourself feel better……

By attacking people of other races……

It’s okay to be white but it’s not okay to be so bitter……

Please grow up…..

HA!!!!

Nova Morium
Guest
Nova Morium

The Alt-Right is a Pro-White Movement………

Nothing you do or say can change that………

Find your People and Find some Peace………

Good Luck……

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

Good thing I have no desire to join the Alt-Right……

I am with what you would call “my people”…..

Matar Judios
Guest
Matar Judios

Sure, biracials are OK. And the stormtroopers too. Everybody is OK today!

Cccl
Guest
Cccl

Well joe you would never say that towards any other group. You just want us gone. You as have illustrated object to us talking heritage ancestry or anything pro white. Blending out= genocide for every group. So much for that diversity is our strength bs. Yes all the blending out propaganda and chasing us down with diversity everywhere all the time. So yes it’s very much being pushed down our throats. Diversity is our strength is never pushed on any other group.

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

Actually it is, you ignomorous. You just don’t live in other countries so you don’t see it.

Gothic Joe
Guest
Gothic Joe

*Ignoramus

Spraguer
Guest
Spraguer

No, it’s not.
Diversity means fewer white people. That’s all it means.