Perspective

The Face of the Union

In yet another delectable blow to the harried Merkel Regime, newly appointed German Interior Minister Horst Seehofer has recently suggested that a temporary suspension of the Schengen Agreement is in order, and a complimentary strengthening of Germany’s national borders, until such a time as Europe is able to secure its own. In his words: “Internal border checks [between EU member states] must be in place so long as the EU fails to effectively control the external border. I don’t see it being able to do this in the near future.” In ours: until the European Union is capable of transforming itself into a political regime, it cannot pretend to dictate the politics of any of its member states.

Seehofer meets Orbán—a new direction for Europe?

Given the nature of the Union today, hardly can we critique the trend of Mr. Seehofer’s suggestions. But his analysis of the reasons for this necessity rings a false note. It gives one the distinct impression that the European Union has long been striving to secure its borders, but has, by some misfortune or handicap, simply been obstructed in this. Be it from excessive bureaucracy, or from the squabbling and incompetency of its various components, etc., this poor awkward beast just doesn’t know how to scratch itself clean of the fleas streaming upon it.

Now, even if this were true, it is surely most telling that the bureaucratic monster of the Union, which has for too long now had its thousand officious fingers in the pettiest details of Europe’s affairs (decrees imposing the kind of light-bulbs that can be utilized, decrees enforcing the use of pesticides by small farmers, and decrees regulating the curvature and size of the bananas and cucumbers sold in local markets, just to name a few gems), cannot pass even provisional measures on one of the most vital issues confronting any emergent state: border control.

These cucumbers don’t make the grade. Thank the gods that Brussels is concerning itself with the essential.

It is also difficult to understand how such a failure is possible. It is obviously not more difficult for the periphery states of Europe to defend that limited portion of their borders adjacent to non-European nations, than it is for them to defend all their borders—those internal and external to Europe both—as they are presently more and more often forced to do. The will to do so is not lacking in certain of these countries; several of them  (Austria and Belgium, for instance) have already suspended Schengen in order to face immigration on their own terms; and several of the major periphery states (e.g., Poland, Hungary, Greece, and Italy) have demonstrated at least a sporadic resolve to protect Europe’s southern gates. But when has Europe ever aided these efforts, in speech, money, or deed?

In point of fact, the European Union has never so much as attempted to defend its borders, and has to the contrary done everything possible to keep them open as a barn door for whatever homeless beasts might care to settle in the straw. It has insisted time and time again on dividing immigrants equitably throughout Europe (doing absolutely nothing, in the meanwhile, to aid those countries which are overwhelmed by their initial arrival), without ever setting forth even the most proposal for staunching the flow in the long run. And most damning of all, on all those occasions that any European country has attempted to unilaterally manage its “migrant crisis” (an intolerable European euphemism for abetted colonization), the Union has been swift to attack them for it.

But a few examples. When Orbán first began to refuse waves on waves of aliens from the South, did the Union ever so much as suggest that Hungary’s protection of European borders might be a boon to anyone involved? Or again, when Italian Prime Minister Gentiloni decided last year to close Italian ports to non-Italian NGO boats, who else was it but the European bureaucrats to call this a breach of European regulation? (Fortunately for everyone, that crisis was tidily resolved when one George Soros flew down for a little chat with Gentiloni, who suddenly and mysteriously changed his mind.) Or finally, when the migrant crisis really hit its stride in Europe some few years ago, where was it that Europe immediately began to allocate its funds? To stronger and more efficient border checks in Italy, in Greece, or in Hungary? But hardly. It funneled all its money into building so-called “refugee centers,” preparing measures for “assimilation” and easing the path for the burdened feet of these swarthy hordes.

The guiding tendency of the European Union really aligns rather nicely with the globalist project of certain extraordinarily powerful, and unfortunately extraordinarily wealthy, men, who are themselves neither bureaucrats nor even politicians, who seek nothing in this world but their own profit, and who most evidently find their profit to lie precisely in the European Union’s borderlessness. It is not an accident that the man whose face heads this article (which man, the reader will ask?) has penned numerous articles promoting open borders and unlimited immigration, and has himself funded many of the same NGO ships which, as is demonstrated again and again, really work as ferry services to African “refugees.” The Union, in all of this, is either incompetent or complicit.

Most conveniently for the “drowning refugees” of the Mediterranean, this ONG recently arranged an appointment with a vessel of African immigrants in Libyan waters. Soon they will not even bother to pretend they are anything but taxis.

We therefore cannot help but be pleased that Germany has even mentioned the possibility of suspending Schengen. Germany in everything it does makes a strong precedent, one that in this case might serve as a powerful tool in the hands of the growing nationalist currents throughout Europe. Euroskeptics would also be happy to see the European behemoth take another, and in this case very bitter, blow; and those who believe that the European Union must not be obliterated so much as remade, might perceive certain possibilities opening thanks to this temporary rupture in the European fabric.

Yet caution is warranted: there was even an article published by a certain, to our eyes thoroughly disreputable, organization known as the “Carnegie Endowment for International Peace,” (a saccharine mouthful, to be sure), which argued that a Union-wide suspension of the Schengen Agreement is actually a means for salvaging Europe and forcing its member states to “work together to deal with the migration crisis.” It is not hard to see why. Immigration is at present the major engine of populist dissatisfaction. Taking the edges off that dissatisfaction now in order to preserve and continue its hidden causes, is no doubt at the top of the priorities for those who really rule in this world.

This is a danger I have mentioned before in the context of the Italian elections, and it is one I will surely mention again: namely, the danger that we succeed a quarter of the way in attaining our vision—just enough to dull the populist spur, and to bring the smothering blanket of blind complacency back down upon our people, thereby guaranteeing the long-term victory precisely of those who would destroy us.

Needless to say, this is hardly a call to cease fighting; it is merely a reminder that our own arms, if we are not wakeful in their use, can be turned against us. We must hone our instinct for where the true center of gravity lies in today’s politics, which is not often easy to uncover in the moralistic pomposity and misleading pretensions to transparency which characterize the democratic regime. We must hone this instinct, I say, both in ourselves and in each other; for only as we understand the true “order” of today’s political regime, can we ever succeed in bringing reasonable opposition against it, or preparing ourselves for any opportunities that might arise for us on occasions like the present.

Simple advice toward that end: read your Machiavelli.

John Bruce Leonard
John Bruce Leonard, Editor-in-Chief of Arktos, studied philosophy, letters, and languages in a university curriculum based exclusively on the great books of the Western Tradition. After taking his degree in Liberal Arts he moved permanently to Italy, where he nourishes his ever-living preoccupation with the heritage and the future of Europe.

Leave a Reply

48 Comments on "The Face of the Union"

avatar
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
From Oldenburg
Guest

From Oldenburg
Guest
From Oldenburg
Guest

Slidell
Guest

Good article.

Sean
Guest

Good, John, but “not hardly” is poor English; the correct expression is “hardly.”

From Oldenburg
Guest

One wonders why English Wikipedia considers the Name
John “English”, although it is also German (Low German).

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/John

From Oldenburg
Guest

You have even towns called Jork (see York) in Northern Germany.
Most English speakers wouldn’t believe their artificial mishmash
language derrives from small area “Angeln” in Northern Germany.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jork

From Oldenburg
Guest

Apropos: Is Mischmasch German?

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Mischmasch

From Oldenburg
Guest
Stefano
Guest

Yes , but at least 35% of modern English is Latin.
And there is MUCH more Latin in English than there is in German.
A HUGE chunk of English is actually just as much of a derivative Latin dialect as Spanish, Italian , French , Portuguese and Rumanian are.

From Oldenburg
Guest

This evil british feminist is a member of Merkel’s “cabinet” of horror

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katarina_Barley

From Oldenburg
Guest

Most evil traitor of Christianity is married to
an American woman and has white children.
But wants Germans to let in millions of nigs.

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heinrich_Bedford-Strohm

KurtW
Plus Member

More great work by J.B. Leonard, thank you. A quote from Machiavelli, which resonates with Richard’s recent videos/interviews: “Whosoever desires constant success must change his conduct with the times.”

North African
Guest

Basically have no honor and be a hypocrite who goes by what is socially acceptable and forgets a virtue when it isn’t convenient ?

Sean
Guest

“Going by what is socially acceptable” is a novel criticism to make of the Alt-Right.

If only we had some people rebelling against the mainstream.

Alas, the true nonconformists are the ruling class — those bald, homosexual, jewish, totalitarian billionaires fightin’ The Man! The courage to get AIDS and take your meds is the last stand of implicit revolutionary zeal. Remember this.

Stewart Miller
Guest
This is unrelated… I am a musician. I went to school for a while as a music major. I am an exceedingly good bass player. Here is an example of my playing: https://soundcloud.com/901x4d/bass_playin I want to start a music group with alt-right minded musicians. I know enough about music theory to play anything you would write. I want to be challenged , though; I am technically skilled and knowledgeable enough to play basically whatever I want, so I don’t want to spend too much time playing boring quarter note rhythms in 4/4 while staring at my shoes. E-mail me @[email protected]… Read more »
From Oldenburg
Guest

Although I admire jermand’s ability to pluck on a bass player, I still don’t find this masterpiece a virtuosity. The problem with this kind of music is that it is not based on European roots. The so-called Blues scale originates from the Negro culture, supported by Jewish record producers. “Freejazz”, for example, stands out for its, chaos, lack of structure, disharmony and atonality. Whether the concern for a white identity is reflected by and expressed in it is rather questionable. White European aesthetic should therefore be based more on classical music or traditional folk music.

From Oldenburg
Guest

(“jermand” = someone)

From Oldenburg
Guest

I am always amazed at how artists of the right spectrum confuse their listening habits with reality. There are Alt-Right-Hip-Hoppers, whose expression is the same as that of black rappers from the ghetto. Only the content of the words is different. For whites who don’t understand English, it’s not even clear that they are not Negroes or Negro imitators.

From Oldenburg
Guest

Whenever Jared Taylor claims Negroes are “musically superior” to Europeans
(as he did recently in an interview with the Israeli) I think: “Are you fooling me?”

From Oldenburg
Guest

Unfortunately, by that he devalues Bach,
Mozart and Haydn, without to realize it.

Sean
Guest

Jared is an old Boomer. Their tendency is to cuck.

From Oldenburg
Guest

https://sendvid.com/mra7lgoa

“My name is Porter!”

“That’s the name your father gave you!”

“Your name is Marilyn!”

From Oldenburg
Guest

(Parker, not “Porter”)

From Oldenburg
Guest
From Oldenburg
Guest
From Oldenburg
Guest
From Oldenburg
Guest
Genealogy with DNA test: all nonsense? Genetic research is booming. Since the very emotional viral video of a large travel search engine, more and more people want to find out where they come from. But what are the real benefits of these tests? It sounds amazingly simple: Simply wipe the mouth with a cotton swab, insert the cotton swab into a tube and send it to one of the many companies that offer DNA genealogy as a service. For example, they are called “My Heritage”, “23andMe”, “ancestry” or “iGENA”. Their promise: to discover their own history. Prices vary between 69… Read more »
From Oldenburg
Guest
Sean
Guest

Give all your personal data to Facebook, and all your genetic data to 23andme.

Never mind that Facebook is Zuckerberg, and that 23andme was cofounded by the wife of Sergei Brin. They only want to help you to have fun and feel good. Here, have a refugee with your cheeseburger.

RestoreSanity
Guest

Action that is not aligned with the goals of the ruling class is impossible in the indirect democracies of the West. The liberal world order is simply a hypocritical dictatorship. It’s a machine designed to tame the will of the people and delay actions against the regime. I remember Merkel herself stating that migration policies had failed many times during her rule, only to let in millions of antagonistic invaders a few months later. We need immediate action and should be regarding anyone issuing vague claims, promises and flatteries as defacto enemies.

Denis+Kearney
Guest

Stephen Pinker….another ROOTLESS COSMOPOLITAN KHARZAR BLOODSUCKING TAPEWORM PARASITE who expresses GENOCIDAL INTENT towards The Historic Native Born White American Majority Working Class…..

North African
Guest

Denis why so you always post the same stuff about the historic native born white working class men of America and shit ?
It’s getting redundant.

Based_WHITE_Man
Guest

Agreed, this is preaching to the choir. If one wants to stand on a soapbox and spread copypasta about White Genocide (i.e. Bob Whitaker’s “The Mantra”), they should do it on the front-lines at Twitter, Facebook and Gab. Not to discredit such proclamations, but you really should know your audience, this one here has heard it plenty but the ones out there haven’t!

Denis+Kearney
Guest
Keep the public Alt Right rap simple…lean… mean….easy to process….to win this battle we don’t need ponderous…plodding…”deep” analysis… Do you want to give up your favorite rock you stand on at the shoreline in October fishing for stripped bass….to 100 Korean “Americans” who have discovered the joy of stripped bass fishing under the moonlight at Montauk… NATIVE BORN WHITE AMERICAN WORKING CLASS INTERESTS are they only thing that matters……this is how you expose in full public view the GENOCIDAL INTENT of the Antifa…Steven Pinker….Noam Chomsky…and the majority nonwhite Democratic Party Voting Bloc…..And this is the fear of our enemy…and the… Read more »
Sean
Guest
Because a convoluted argument about Koreans, moonlight, and Montauk is clear. Just as clear as long phrases such as “American Born Native White Working Class Chinese Immigrant Exclusion Act” and “majority nonwhite Democratic Party Voting Bloc.” In any case, this site is not principally for the general public; it’s for the vanguard. As Based_WHITE_Man suggested, please address normies on Minds.com, Gab.ai, Facebook, Twitter, and Breitbart. You were already permabanned from Steve Sailer’s sites (all three of them), and others, for spamming your Kindergarten-tier junk. Spencer is extraordinarily tolerant, but you might be pushing your luck again. I advise you to… Read more »
Stefano
Guest

True

North African
Guest

Yes Europe can change it’s face, the new face shall be black. Since dumb leftist women welcome them with open arms ( fuck you Sweden ) and Europe will take the You + Rope option and commit suicide. ( Get it ? Eu ( you ) + rope ) unless Soros and his Jewish thugs are stopped.

Stewart Miller
Guest

Sometimes you make sense, and sometimes you are intolerable.

North African
Guest

And you always deserve to eat a bullet.