Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Richard W. Burden on The Look-in-the-Eye Test
- Ritesh patil on The Alt-Right and the Homosexual Question — Part 1
- Mr Right Reverend Gregory Karl Davis on The Look-in-the-Eye Test
- Ebenezer Suresh on What It Means To Be Alt-Right
- Op-Ed: The price of Richard Spencer | The Michigan Daily on Because Hitler. . .
Archives
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- May 2015
- September 2014
- January 2005
By the way, this is one of the better shows you gentlemen have done.
TWP:
with the collapse of the TWP, I hope we can agree that from this point forward, Neo-Nazi/Fascist/Combat attire is now synonymous with anti-white. Or with MORON. Or with unstable.
Or with agent of the enemy.
PLEASE STOP IT!!!
If you need to wear a uniform, how about blue jeans, tan cowhide boots, and thick with t-shirt. When a jacket is needed, a tan barn coat. The winter hat will be the brown Carhartt scull cap or perhaps a buffalo pad trapper hat. The gloves, black leather.
Now that’s a truly American uniform. Little bit cowboy, little bit blue collar worker, little bit James Dean.
Can our gracious hosts discuss this uniform possibility on the next show?
I couldn’t agree more. We should dress the attitudes we idealize as Americans. there are only two people in our movement either you’re an asset or a detriment, TWP was never an asset and I’m personally glad they are gone.
Hot.?
The uniform?
Yeah,
South Africa:
The situation is getting worse in SA. I saw those pictures of the squatter camps that white south African children are living in. God send us a Saint Francis figure to start a “religious order”, or some kind of “holy order” where they’d go to South Africa and live in poverty with the people. They’d be their witnesses, advocates, and servants (so to speak).
Does anyone volunteer to take on this heavy load?
Christians gladfully took up this kind of life.
Russia:
These people, sometimes called “globalists”:
e.i. Clinton wing of Democratic party, McCain, Lindsey Gram, most of the Senate…Republican or Democrat, much of Jewry (more cooperation with Russia in Israel than diaspora but they do bomb Putin’s ally in Syria ), pretty much all the MSM, the Bilderberg crowd, City of London, etc.
have been trying for years to provoke Russia into doing something rash. Russia has very admirably abstained from stupid reactions but still did use force effectively in Georgia in 2008, then Syria and Ukraine. These used it differently each time but compared with the US/British/NATO’s recent history of military action were able to do a lot more with much less.
So since the globalists couldn’t get Russia to react (like the Vietnamese in the Gulf of Tonkin), they’re just going to pull a Lusitania.
But Russia-gate is also about the Alt-Right. There’s a reason both Hilary Clinton and Glen Beck explicitly present the rather dishonest idea that the Alt-Right is tied to Russia in an active measures operation to “attack our democracy.” They want to use fear of a foreign enemy to crack down on the Alt-Right in America and Nationalist Movements in Western Europe.
They know that the winds of change are against them and clearly must be desperate. They benefited from the first and second world wars and might think that a third war will work out for them? Their biggest enemies are Russia outside the West and the populist/nationalist right in America and Europe. They want to be able to surveil and/or attack the populist/nationalist movements in their own countries with the same power of law and force that they can a foreign adversary.
How about Eli….any spin for him re: his missteps…he has done A LOT for you. maybe he still is but what do you have to say to protect his image??
The threat of war with Russia was a scare tactic used by Trump’s opposition, especially among entry level politicians who wanted Hilary in for their own ambitions. I’m not going to drop names but I know this to be true.
Your comments on the UK and poisoning were spot on, Richard. Bravo.
There is no way I would ever feel sorry for TWP. We have to be separate from these idiots and even go as far as embracing their demise.
Can you explain why you’re so against the TWP and what they represent? I’m asking seriously, not to be combative. I am from the Midwest, and like Greg and Don, I saw them as – on balance – a very positive movement for Whites who are living in the rural areas of this part of the country. Much of the rural midwest has effectively been laid to waste. Factories have gone overseas, small businesses driven out by corporate chains, there are heartbreaking rates of suicide, meth and opiate abuse, alcoholism, abandoned and derelict properties, and decay on almost every imaginable level. So much of the Midwest is a White, open-spaced ghetto.
And honestly I had very little familiarity with the TWP until I saw that a handful of them were the sole defenders of ALL of the rally goers at the recent MSU event. Patriot Front was there, but I saw none of them engaging in physical defense. I had a few criticisms of TWP on that day (armbands and uniforms reminiscent of Hitler and Mussolini’s guys, one of them becoming enraged after being attacked by Antifa and screaming some racial slurs)….but it was the first time I’ve seen the altright mount an organized and intimidating defense against masked, weapon-wielding Antifa terrorists. It was a proud day, at least as I experienced it.
The point of my first paragraph was just that the TWP – at least as it seemed to me – represented a sharp departure from that degeneracy and decay. They seemed to stand for strong communities, strong families, bettering yourself through learning a trade, getting yourself out of addiction (if the person in question was an addict). They had veterans in their ranks, even some special forces guys. I get that what Heimbach did was embarassing and unacceptable, but I think it would be a tragedy if TWP and Heimbach were to simply walk away from it all. Matt’s personal life does not affect anyone but Matt and his family. I’m of the opinion that the rest of us need to mind our own business.
I mean not really man look what Heimbach just did. If he is truly this corrupt and disgusting imagine What his subordinates embrace.
Ok, these guys are the fruit of these areas you actually described them
perfectly and that’s probably why I have such hatred toward them.
I don’t pity the meth and opiate addict and I certainly don’t want
anything to do with these people. And how is it anyone of us could ever see these people other than huge embarrassments?
We, don’t need the lowest of human society representing our movement and we certainly should never embrace someone so disgusting that he actually partakes in incest. I could see myself forgiving someone for drug abuse but there has to be a line drawn when it comes, Matthew Heimbach.
In short, I just don’t like these people these are the sort who only think of their dicks and their stomachs and have no greater compacity of higher thinking. They’re certainly not us and they’re not meant to be with us. For every good thing TWP has done they’ve eclipsed it with making us look like fools.
Let me ask you in what context do you see these guys fitting in with the Alt-Right?
Fair enough. Well my feelings on the TWP and why they’re desperately needed in the Altright were almost perfectly summed up by Greg and Don in their portion of the TWP segment of this podcast (1:23:00-1:35:00). The optics need some work – no goofy shields, no flags with swastikas or the like, etc. – but optics are very easy to fix.
Heimbach is actually quite intelligent and he is college-educated, in fact he was mostly an honor roll and straight-A student for most of his life. He’s a great speaker. And I didn’t mean to imply that there are former drug addicts in their midst. I believe they have extremely low tolerance for those things, but that they’d welcome a former addict into their ranks if that person had long-term sobriety and was bettering themselves. I’ve never been addicted to drugs – in fact I’ve never even known a drug addict – but from what I see they’re pathetic people who need serious help. I agree with Trump that drug traffickers need to be executed. But I’m all about helping addicts to recover (if they genuinely want to).
In closing, basically the men of the TWP have a level of toughness and fearlessness that I don’t think I’ve ever witnessed anywhere prior to the MSU event. If the Altright is every going to successfully organize and follow through with any type of event or meetup, they only need a handful of TWP to counteract scores of violent protesters. They are the only ones I’ve seen strike fear into Antifascist terrorists. I’ve seen a lot video of Altrighters at various events, and let’s be honest: 95% of them are not fearless warriors. They’re worried about getting stabbed by Antifa, and they’re worried about injuries and lawsuits, like most of us. The TWP were the warrior class. They were also a force of strength and good in rural areas of the country where decay and degeneracy are high.
I think the permanent loss of Heimbach would be a disaster. It may be true that up to this point he has done more harm than good. I really don’t know.
I do think he has potential, though. Everyone fucks up. Besides, I can only imagine how stressful it must be to try to support a family as a public White advocate.
I’m not saying I have an opinion on what to do at this point. I don’t. I’m just saying I hope for some sort of reconciliation or at least an Edict of Toleration in future.
People like Heimbach need to die out in order for people like Spencer to succeed.
Seriously, how in any way is this a disaster?
Because people are dropping dead from opioid addiction, and I think Heimbach was trying to help the people who are suffering.
In 2016, 64,000 people died. The thing you have to realize is that those deaths are not spread out but concentrated. Whole towns are being destroyed. There are Moms losing not just one but two children. It is just unspeakably horrible.
I do think following our leaders is important, though, and I too have been frustrated with people’s refusal to do so.
Yes, we need to convince people to stop doing drugs but do we really want them to use the Alt-Right as a substitute? I seriously don’t see drug abusers belonging to any political movement. Nor, do I find them tagging with us a benefit to what we’re trying to achieve. Honestly, what enrichment do the dregs of society have that we want to preserve, what can they offer us? I often ask myself if drug dealers are giving us a favour by removing America of its Irish problem.
“I often ask myself if drug dealers are giving us a favour by removing America of its Irish problem.”
No offense, but this is why you need women in this movement. This sort of statement will do more damage than Heimbach ever could. Trust me on this one.
It was a joke.
Oh OK sorry.
I can’t disagree with everything that you said yes TWP was our Sturmabteilung, but the time has come to make them take the same option Hitler gave to Ernst Röhm and the SA.
It’s hard for me to say what should be happening in our movement, but certainly, public events are out of the question because we can not trust our own constituents not to make us look like idiots. although I have participated in one public event representing the views of the Alt-Right in the past and it wasn’t easy seeing I decided to come out as Alt-Right, right after Charlottesville.
But, more importantly, when I did come out as Alt-Right I did so eloquently and represented (not my views) but the views of our superiors Spencer, Enoch and Taylor. This is something Heimbach and the rest of TWP could never do.
You are totally misrepresenting Heimbach, he is certainly not intelligent by any means. The guy is out of control and frankly, he’s a fucking idiot. Listen to any one of his speeches and I dear you to compare him to the caliber of the people I listed above. There is no match.
I can’t remember which video it was but Ryan from AltHype made the argument that embracing the derogative our enemy gives us is the stupidest thing ever. Maybe you don’t get this and I don’t think you do or does anyone who sticks up for TWP, but when we accept being called “NAZI’s” and dress the part of these fools we do exactly what the SPLC wanted to do in the first place we dehumanize ourselves saving them the effort.
We have to look at the current time the same way as those being accused of being a witch would during the1500’s. Being accused of being a NAZI is not far from being the same it’s just short of it. And certainly, anyone being accused of being a witch or a Satanist would never laugh it off and just embrace it in the same way TWP does when they’re being called NAZI’s.
Overall a great podcast. Loved 99% of it.. But.. The part where the guys are talking about Lauren Southern & the great job she is doing w/ her Doc “Farmlands” & how she was put in the British gulag for speaking out against atrocities against Whites in S.Africa. But why did they AGAIN have to throw in some juvenile comment about Lauren would be doing more for the cause if she just had children instead.. That stupid comment ruined an otherwise great podcast.
As re: TWP, revolutions aren’t made by the bourgeoisie elements of a culture. They are made by desperate men with little to lose. TWP were street fighters, obviously, bad optics or no. Heimbach was just as willing to get his ass kicked, hospitalized, etc. Say what you will, I remember listening to a podcast right after Charlottesville, wherein the young man making the podcast commented, “NOBODY fought like the TWP guys. Those guys really knew what they were doing.”
Whatever good they did in the past completely eclipse’s the amount of harm they have caused our movement.
I’m missing something.
What great harm did Heimbach and his crew cause?
Heimbach fucked his Speaker’s wife. Causing him to leave the twp. And make nationalist movements look bad.
As he main speaker said ” SPLC has won I’m out ”
Calls himself a traditionalist yet cheats on his wife with the wife of a colleague and then tries to strangle said colleague to death for telling him to stop. Then gets home and beats up his own wife who he’s been cheating on, so he can feel alpha.
The dude always looked like a low Testosterone fat pig with no honor to me.
thats a different story. what would be different right now if everyone the past 3 years dressed nice in public though? i say nothing much but if everyone took to the streets that may have shown people how serious we are
Song at the end?
Usually Xurious
These guys are no doubt extremely intelligent and insightful. I just wish I could find everything as funny as they seem to. If I’m the only one who finds the levity off-putting, then it’s no problem. But if keeps them from appealing to a wider audience, it might be something to think about.
I’ve only listened to issues 1&2, but here goes:
Don, why don’t you explain what you meant by “womanish”? That is not actually a real word in the English language. If you were criticizing May, I’m sure you can find a word that actually has a conventional meaning that others will understand.
Greg, you offered a bone fide criticism of Lauren Southern, essentially saying, “Instead of doing X, I would rather she do Y.” Thank you for being constructive.
I will offer a constructive criticism of my own. It sounded as though you are actually more concerned about policing conformity to your own very rigid conception of gender roles than you are about the very lives of millions of White men, women, and children in South Africa. It’s not a good look.
The simple fact is that she is doing what no one else has been able to do. It doesn’t matter if you think that is right or proper. It just is. On the AR, we say we work with human nature, but you seem to resist it. If a woman is the only person who can get the job done, for whatever reason, then ipso facto, it is a woman’s job, however you might feel about that.
“Womanish” is absolutely a word in the English language. Check the Oxford English Dictionary (if you’re truly serious about speaking the King’s) or the Merriam-Webster (if you’re a misguided Ameriburger) and you’ll see that I’m (as almost always) correct. I may be a quasi-foreigner, but I speak English better than most Anglophones. I always welcome warranted criticism, but this is petty, shallow, and transparent. Take your misplaced feminism elsewhere, thank you very much.
OK, you’re right. “Womanish” is a word. Nonetheless, my point remains. If you google the word, you’ll see that it says: adjective derogatory.
Why do you insult women, Don? How does insulting women will help secure a future for White children?
Wahmen are ruining the west. Since they got the right to vote in 1920 every survey shows that they vote overwhelmingly for leftists and open borders, welfare etc.
Feminism has castrated the white male.
Women at work has made it impossible to survive on a single income. Since when you double the working force the price of the labor goes down. Women governments are genociding Germanistan Swedistan and the united Cuckdom.
Honestly women are to blame for half the problem of your dying breed. Thank God women don’t hold such power in the third world which allows our numbers to stay way above yours and keep feminism at bay.
Women simply don’t THINK. They feel. ” oh poor black baby let’s adopt him instead of having our own.” Lexi admit it your kind is the problem. Your place is in the kitchen or in bed ,. No where near a voting ballot.
Eve caused the fall of Adam. Pandora open the box and unleashed evil on earth. Merkel let 3 million fighting age Muslim males into her country to rape them like in Cologne.
I agree women are half the problem. Men are the other half.
Wrong Jews are the other half.
Maybe you can explain to me why not a single one of the White male billionaires in Forbes 400 donates to the AR. Literally not a single one out of 100+
Because they want to stay rich duh ?
Doesn’t help to blame others when we’re talking about you. Why changing the subject ? Another trait of you women.
End of discussion you clearly cannot accept facts.
The misogynist snickers as he strikes you, then cries foul when you strike back.
I don’t recall open borders ever being voted on.
hi north!! i actually agree with you that women entering the work force created a buyer’s market, thereby reducing wages, making it necessary for a two income household for most families. that really sucks. i don’t blame women to want autonomy. i also think having too many choices is a problem for some women. the good part is that men are finding they have more opportunity and flexibility as a result. women also used to volunteer and do good works in their communities and that was very valuable.
I agree with this. As a matter of fact, I think the economic argument is going to become ever more compelling as automation destroys jobs.
I read this book but it’s been years so I don’t remember much.
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/854759.The_Two_Income_Trap
women and some men are leaving the work force early. i know a lot of women who have lucrative online businesses and they are home with their children. men are doing the same. it makes sense to offer SS and Medicare earlier than 65+. it will allow people to retire and open up jobs for others. the SS money will go directly into our economy. over time it will sort out. the problem we have is the resistance people have about accepting change. it makes it harder for us to adjust.
BOOM smacked down by none other than The Right Honourable Don Camillo himself! That’s gotta sting.
Lexi, I’ve noticed that you get hysterical any time anyone mentions any issue of women or femininity in a remotely negative light. You need to get a grip. This movement is overwhelmingly male: you’re going to have to learn to deal with an occasional, harmless knock on women.
There’s no shortage of bonafide misogynists in the altright, but if you’re a regular listener to this podcast then you’d know full well that Don certainly isn’t one of them. Don’t give the man any shit!
His use of the word “womanish” was absolutely retarded. It literally made no sense whatsoever.
And yes, Don Camilo is certainly a bona fide misogynist. If every time you talk about women in general, you say something insulting, then yes you are a misogynist. Sorry.
Don Camilo needs to shut up unless he has something nice to say, or at least something that is (1) true, and (2) useful.
Hey Lexi, remember me? I’m the male feminist who used to haunt this forum. Yyou should leave the Alt-Right. They don’t respect you and they will always regard you as less than them. Come over to our side. We respect our leftist women.
Kill yourself lefty.
If you’re White, you should come over to our side. You will eventually anyway. It’s only a matter of time.
PRES OF DC: “Don Camillo” doesn’t exist so she was “slapped down” by a nobody.
Because neither women nor womanish men can save the West
I don’t entirely disagree, but that doesn’t mean we don’t have a role to play.
You men believe that heroism is for men only, but that’s not true.
> Heroism isn’t only for men.
> Typical retarded woman.
https://www.etymonline.com/word/hero
Heroism is ONLY male, that’s the definition you moron.
BTW
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/heroine
Sadly men went extinct in 1945.
The difference between a traditionalist and a misogynist is that the former recognize women’s strengths as well as their weaknesses. The latter jealously guard all higher virtues for themselves alone.
From Anna Karenina:
At the sight of the sick man, [Kitty] felt pity for him. And pity in her woman’s soul produced none of the horror and squeamishness it did in her husband, but a need to act, to find out all the details of his condition and help with them. As she did not have the slightest doubt that she had to help him, so she had no doubt that it was possible, and she got down to work at once. Those same details, the mere thought of which horrified her husband, at once attracted her attention. (5.18.2)
Did you even click on the link ? You’re factually wrong by stating that Heroism is for both.
Women at home. Men out slaying the dragon.
A woman’s strength is helping her man. Not competing against him.
Women have no virtue only sin. Original sin committed by Eve. Pandora’s box opened by a woman and thus unleashing evil on earth.
https://www.etymonline.com/word/virtu
Even the word virtue comes from virtus meaning goodness and… MANLINESS !
So you’re telling me the founders of Western philosophy and civilization know less than a woman on the internet named Lexi ?
No I didn’t click on the link. It’s irrelevant. I know what the word means today, I know myself, and I see women in this movement doing more good for Whites than petty men who insult and abuse them. That’s all I need to know.
Apparently, men need to be shamed into slaying the dragon in South Africa by a brave and literate White woman who is willing to focus on the issue. I assure you she will be delighted if and White women get off the damned couch and get to slaying.
Fortunately, I know more than the founders of Western civilization about all sorts of things. You worship the past, which is why your kind stagnate. However numerous, you will never be great. Indeed, you are only numerous because we are great.
“White men get off …”
Foolish female arrogance at its finest. Ah well have a nice day.
Since I was looking up words in the dictionary, I decided to look up feminism. Here’s what I got:
“the advocacy of women’s rights on the basis of equality of the sexes.”
This is not my position and never has been, Don. Do you agree with this definition? If not, what is your definition? If feminists are not welcome in the alt-Right, you need to tell us what you think makes a person a feminist.
Egalitarianism would be better than feminism.
But still a heresy women are not equal to men that’s just how nature intended it to be.
North African? Are you Algerian, Tunisian, Moroccan? If so, you are inferior to a Caucasian woman. 90% of North Africans have black ancestry, hence they are black and inferior to any Caucasian. Average IQ of North Africa is in the mid 80s. Neither the male or female North African can produce anything of value.
Retarded skank go back to sucking BBC
Love how you think highly of yourself even though you’ve never achieved anything in your life. It’s called entitlement a false sense of worth. You think you’re worth something, perhaps 10$ in Libyan slave markets.
Being born Caucasian, Christian is the ultimate prize on this earth. You were given the booby prize.
No one is born Christian. They are either taught it at a very young age, or convert later.
Hey North African, stop being an Uncle Tom!
Don’t you have some filthy communist dicks to clean wih your mouth ?
Back to the matter at hand: “womanish” is defined as weak or indecisive. Now, right or wrong, what May did was not weak or indecisive in the ordinary senses of those words. Indeed, Spencer characterized it as aggressive and threatening if I recall correctly. Therefore, I think it is entirely reasonable to ask you what exactly you meant by womanish in this context?
Unbelievable. Lexi, you appear to be doing everything in your power to make sure that women are kept as far away from this movement as possible. I don’t think I ever remember any man, woman, or child – in my entire lifetime – being as much of a colossal pain in the ass as you are being on this comment section. Your behavior is exactly the reason most men in the alt-right want to keep women out at all costs. They are convinced that, if the “fairer” sex were let in, they’d do nothing but nitpick and nag us to the point of insanity (as you’re intent on doing here).
And If memory serves, you’ve mentioned that you’re a mother. Wouldn’t your time be better served in some way tending to your kids rather than having psychological breakdowns online over absolutely nothing? And I am going to say this not be an asshole, but it’s because what I honestly believe as someone who was involved in the medical field for a long period of time – if you’re not on some form of psychiatric medication, you need to be. The time and energy I’ve seen you devote to battling people on this website can only be described as pathological. Whether you have histionic personality disorder, some form of OCD, borderline PD, I have no idea….you need to be evaluated by a mental health professional.
I honestly cannot believe you’re making such a big deal out of what Don said. It’s unfair, and it’s completely out of line. People who in any way lead or publicly speak for the altright have enough to worry about and contend with, they don’t need to be crucified by someone who claims to be one of our own. If what he said was genuinely misogynistic and hateful, fine. But it clearly wasn’t. In fact I don’t ever remember him saying anything that could be taken as truly misogynistic, and I’ve been listening for over a couple of years (the many podcasts recorded prior to Charlottesville were deleted by Soundcloud the day after Charlottesville, and no trace of (most) of them remains). I do regularly him say very flattering and complimentary things about traditional women and traditional femininity, though.
And I’ve attached the actual definition of the word ‘womanish,’ lifted directly from the first result of a ‘define womanish’ Google search, because it’s clear that you’ve a very different definition than the rest of the world does. It is only very weakly derogative, and it is infinitely less derogative than the things I hear you regularly you say about us men when you’re having one of your many psychotic episodes.
I’m going to be on my merry way now, I really don’t have time for any of this. Please think about what I said here and what Don said in the post he made a few hours ago. I’ve never met him, but I’ve listened to him enough to feel like I’ve met him. He seems to be thee definition of a solid dude. I don’t normally get involved in these things, but when the hosts of the show have to take time out of their busy day to defend themselves against baseless attacks, I have no choice but to chime in. You owe him an apology at the very least.
adjective derogatory
adjective: womanish
suitable to or characteristic of a woman.
“he confused introspection with womanish indecision”
(of a man) effeminate; unmanly.
“Burden thought him a weak womanish fool”
synonyms: effeminate, girlish, girly, unmanly, unmasculine, epicene
“Andrew’s first stage role was that of a womanish baker from Brooklyn”
antonyms: manly
“People who in any way lead or publicly speak for the altright have enough to worry about and contend with, they don’t need to be crucified by someone who claims to be one of our own.”
I quite agree with you that the alt-Right has enough to worry about as it is, which is why for the life of me I cannot see the point of antagonizing women, whom I will remind you make up about a third of the American electorate and saved this country from Hillary Clinton.
Which cut was the “unkindest” in Julius Ceasar? Brutus’, because Ceasar believed Brutus to be his best friend. Women have put up with one slap in the face after another these past few years. Of course it stings the most coming from men we thought we’re our friends. The most outrageous misogynists can’t hurt us anymore. We know they hate us and have already written them off.
I will say this. I am sorry for overreacting. In future I will try to make it a point to cool off before posting.
Still, none of this changes the fact that women have been treated like total shit in this movement. Now, let’s don’t pretend otherwise. I am not trying to make trouble for nothing.
The woman question needs to be dealt with in a systematic and transparent way. Women need to have an opportunity to defend ourselves without name-calling. Men also deserve to be heard without being accused of cucking, White knighting, breaking ranks for a piece of ass or whatever.
You seem to think that the WQ is a trivial distraction. If that is true, let’s set it to the side and stop talking about it. If it’s not true, it needs to be dealt with in a serious way, not by way of off-hand remarks.
This is not about me. I don’t come on these threads to socialize, and yes I do have other things to do. As far as my children are concerned, surely you must understand that nothing is more important to their future than this movement. As damaging as the TWP affair was, I suspect it is nothing in comparison to the PR damage the woman-haters are doing.
ok, i guess you don’t value women..that’s ok but who is going to populate your ethnostate? being respectful towards women you encounter might help you with that part. are you married with children?
The thing is there’s probably a grain of truth to his assertion that I’m about ready to lose my mind. It’s like how your kids ignore you when you ask them nicely the first 999 times. Then that last time you blow your stack and they act all wounded and look at you like you’re crazy. Of course, you kind of are at that point, because they’ve finally driven you to distraction.?
you’re not wrong about what you have observed regarding him and what he thinks of women. he’s insecure and he will not engage in a respectable conversation with you.
let them stew in their own hatred. it’s a sad life for sure.
it seems that you want to challenge him and encourage him to be self reflective and to take responsibilty for himself. he won’t be able to do that until he decides he wants to be a man instead of a boy.
these guys are a bunch of rich, spoiled fratboys who don’t like it that women are demanding and getting a place at the table.
there are problems with feminism for sure but like anything other movement, the loudest few get all the attention. the people just plugging away and living their lives never are heard.
arguing with these guys is fruitless.
Actually, “womanish” is a real word, and here’s the link to all the respected dictionaries that list it as such: https://www.google.com/search?q=womanish&rlz=1C1SQJL_enUS761US761&oq=womanish&aqs=chrome..69i57&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
Read the definitions and you’ll see that Don’s use of the term was unpardonably stupid. This shit has got to stop, now. If Don can’t hold his tongue about women for one fucking hour out of the week, he’s unfit for purpose.
Lol, I’m glad to see this is still going on while some of us have better things to do with our lives.
Look, Lexi, I don’t know what more to tell you. You’re fixated on my completely germane and apropos use of an adjective that perfectly described the subject at hand. I’ve read enough of your comments on here in the past to know that you’re a smart lady. Now, be smart enough to recognise when you’re wrong. Just admit that you’re frustrated at the more crude and misguided misogynists in the movement — of whom I am not one — and stop venting at me for some reason.
I’d also like to clarify something else, since you pretend to know me and my true feelings about women better than I do. I’ve never said anything callously misogynistic without a contextual reason to validate my comments. Sometimes it’s in the form of a joke (in which case you’re supposed to lighten up and laugh along) and sometimes it’s in response to a specific woman or a specific group of women who 100% deserved my ire for some subversive, degenerate, leftist nonsense. But never a cheap shot just because the subject is a woman. I challenge you to go back into the archives and try to refute me on this point. Spoiler alert: you probably won’t be able to.
I can’t emphasise enough how little I care about you or what you think of me, I have better things to do than to justify myself to an internet commentator. But since we’re on the subject of my true feelings about women, I’ll give them to you. Consider this a little behind-the-paywall “Plus” content. As a traditionalist Catholic, I believe neither in the rabid feminism of the atomised post-Christian “West” nor do I believe in the dehumanising subjugation of Islam. I believe in the middle ground laid out in the social teachings of the Catechism. I believe not in the forced and artificial “equality” between the sexes, but rather in the natural and God-ordained COMPLEMENTARITY between Man and Woman, who together make a whole. Yes, I believe in a male-led household (first under her father, then under her husband), but I also believe that women are intrinsically, biologically, temperamentally, and emotionally better suited than men at a good many things. Embracing your femininity is embracing this dauntingly difficult existence and living it to the utmost of your ability. While men bear their own share of very heavy responsibilities — i.e. the moral and financial fate of his family lies in his hands — women must strive to be the best possible daughters, sisters, wives, mothers, and grandmothers; to birth, raise, and educate children; and support their menfolk to the ends of the Earth. Yes, it’s a daunting task and a sometimes ungrateful existence, but that’s why traditional men respect traditional women and disdain those other sluts who are ruining it for the rest of us.
Now you know, Lexi, why I’m successful with the fairer sex and fondly remembered by my female friends and conquests as a consummate gentleman. I’d also like to remind you that your opinion of my fitness to be on this podcast is beyond irrelevant. If you like what I do, stay and listen, you might learn something. And if you don’t like it? You’re more than welcome to show yourself out.
Thank you for this. I intend to respond in detail, not for the sake of argument, but rather because I think the issues are important.
(1) I don’t understand your use of this adjective. I always admit when I’m wrong, and would do so here if I understood. I don’t need you to explain it to me, only understand that I’m not being obtuse or stubborn.
(2) The trouble is that not all misogynists are “crude.” Nor does crudeness particularly matter to me. That is a question of style rather than substance. The “crude misogynists” will take their cues from leaders such as yourself. I believe it is your responsibility to be diplomatic as well as realistic about women and our share of blame for the plight of our people.
(3) “But never a cheap shot just because the subject is a woman.” It sounded to me like this is what you did in regards to May, and it infuriated me exactly because I had never heard you do that before and I expected more of you.
(4) “I believe in the middle ground laid out in the social teachings of the Catechism.”
Agreed.
(5) “I also believe that women are intrinsically, biologically, temperamentally, and emotionally better suited than men at a good many things.”
I would encourage you to make a conscious effort to say so from time to time, spontaneously and as appropriate in context. It builds good will and opens the heart to constructive criticism when it is needed.
(6) “Yes, it’s a daunting task and a sometimes ungrateful existence, but that’s why traditional men respect traditional women and disdain those other sluts who are ruining it for the rest of us.”
This gets to the heart of my real beef. There appears to be a consensus in this movement that “sluts” (almost all women nowadays) are to blame for the state of the West. This consensus emerged from the pits of misogyny on the Internet where women are all but outright banned. Women never had any opportunity to be heard on this matter. It is long past time for a serious debate on these issues, not a take-it-or-leave-it forgone conclusion. I have repeatedly cited evidence that contradicts “female hypergamy” theory and been ignored. I can take a joke, but slander is unacceptable.
(7) I don’t doubt that you have had success with women and treated them with courtesy, but you err if you believe that this in itself means you are not contemptuous towards women. It just means you’re not abusive.
Don’t misunderstand. I’m not saying you are contemptuous of women. I take your word that you are not, but we can’t read your mind. If you do not censor yourself about what you see as our weaknesses, yet keep your thoughts to yourself about our strengths, we will draw the conclusion that you don’t think highly of us.
This conversation has been illuminating for me and I hope it will further mutual understanding and strengthen the movement.
he cares so little about you and what you think of him that he wrote a four, long paragraph defense for himself while throwing in a good dose of gas-lighting. these “men” are insecure losers…we need to remember this.
How the alt-Right treats women:
http://southpark.cc.com/clips/149868/presidents-statement
Unbelievable. Lexi, you appear to be doing everything in your power to make sure that women are kept as far away from this movement as possible. I don’t think I ever remember any man, woman, or child – in my entire lifetime – being as much of a colossal pain in the ass as you are being on this comment section. Your behavior is exactly the reason most men in the alt-right want to keep women out at all costs. They are convinced that, if the “fairer” sex were let in, they’d do nothing but nitpick and nag us to the point of insanity (as you’re intent on doing here).
And If memory serves, you’ve mentioned that you’re a mother. Wouldn’t your time be better served in some way tending to your kids rather than having psychological breakdowns online over absolutely nothing? And I am going to say this not be an asshole, but it’s because what I honestly believe as someone who was involved in the medical field for a long period of time – if you’re not on some form of psychiatric medication, you need to be. The time and energy I’ve seen you devote to battling people on this website can only be described as pathological. Whether you have histionic personality disorder, some form of OCD, borderline PD, I have no idea….you need to be evaluated by a mental health professional.
I honestly cannot believe you’re making such a big deal out of what Don said. It’s unfair, and it’s completely out of line. People who in any way lead or publicly speak for the altright have enough to worry about and contend with, they don’t need to be crucified by someone who claims to be one of our own. If what he said was genuinely misogynistic and hateful, fine. But it clearly wasn’t. In fact I don’t ever remember him saying anything that could be taken as truly misogynistic, and I’ve been listening for over a couple of years (the many podcasts recorded prior to Charlottesville were deleted by Soundcloud the day after Charlottesville, and no trace of (most) of them remains). I do regularly him say very flattering and complimentary things about traditional women and traditional femininity, though.
And I’ve attached the actual definition of the word ‘womanish,’ lifted directly from the first result of a ‘define womanish’ Google search, because it’s clear that you’ve a very different definition than the rest of the world does. It is only very weakly derogative, and it is infinitely less derogative than the things I hear you regularly you say about us men when you’re having one of your many psychotic episodes.
I’m going to be on my merry way now, I really don’t have time for any of this. Please think about what I said here and what Don said in the post he made a few hours ago. I’ve never met him, but I’ve listened to him enough to feel like I’ve met him. He seems to be thee definition of a solid dude. I don’t normally get involved in these things, but when the hosts of the show have to take time out of their busy day to defend themselves against baseless attacks, I have no choice but to chime in. You owe him an apology at the very least.
adjective derogatory
adjective: womanish
suitable to or characteristic of a woman.
“he confused introspection with womanish indecision”
(of a man) effeminate; unmanly.
“Burden thought him a weak womanish fool”
synonyms: effeminate, girlish, girly, unmanly, unmasculine, epicene
“Andrew’s first stage role was that of a womanish baker from Brooklyn”
antonyms: manly
Very respectable take on the TWP situation, a refreshing contrast to other voices in the movement
Matt Heimbach portion starts at 1:20 into the podcast. No new insights, however.
Since (densely populated) Dutch are the racially purest Germinics alongside Scandinavians (with little population), it is reasonable to assume that their South African relatives are also Germanics. That’s why “Pure 100% Bavarian Phenotype” by Murdoch Murdoch is bullshit. The Austrian Hitler belonged to the Alpine race, not to the Nordic race. Frisian is a mixture of English and German, but neither English nor German can speak or understand it. But they could very easily. If they would try, they would have reconnected.
https://www.eupedia.com/europe/genetic_maps_of_europe.shtml
This playlist is revealing.
Root- and stemless “Americans” can form thoughts in German which cannot be reached in their depth due to the lack of homogeneity of the degenerate English language.
What about the Anglo-Teutonic master race ?
The Angels and the Teutons were two Germanic tribes. “master race” doesn’t fit because there are only a few breeds in Europe.
http://neinwirschaffendasnicht.com/2016/10/04/die-rassen-europas-und-das-deutsche-volk/
“Breeds” … I meant “races”. Dutch, Frisians and Lower Saxons are closer to the English than the Alpine race, which are closer to Italians.
Master race due to conquering the world….you know British empire….25% of the planet….biggest in History.
Plautdietsch (I only know Plattdeutsch/Plattdüütsch/Flatdutch) is a strange Language.
https://www.youtube.com/user/plautcast/videos
Brian (Badger) and/un/und Horst try to communicate
High German speakers try to understand Low German (Dutch) speakers
“English” is no longer salvageable.
For example there is no Germanic term for expression in English. German Ausdruck would be somewhat like outthrutch/outthrong.
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/thrutch#English
But the greatest joke of all time is still coming: The “Americans” are German! Because German-Americans are the largest minority of the USA! But it gets much more funny: “Americans” are more Irish than English! There are 35 million Irish people in the US!
I know all of that. Germania is the heart of Evropa no wonder they destroyed it and had Germanic fight each other.
Apropos Ireland
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Famine_(Ireland)
Look at that devilish anti-Semitic smile !
The truth is a racist. But “devil” comes from Greek “diabolein”, which means “to throw or cast apart.” The opposite is symbolein: “to throw or cast together.” In a very real way “symbolic” refers to integration and “diabolic” refers to compartmentalization.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compartmentalization_(psychology)
“devilish nazis”
62 Jewgle entries
https://www.google.com/search?q=%22devilish+nazis%22&spell=1&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiK3a_4rvfZAhXLB8AKHUsjC-QQBQgkKAA&biw=1600&bih=813
“devilish Jews”
332 Jewgle entries
https://www.google.li/search?biw=1600&bih=813&ei=AiSvWuSbCIrMgAbQiI6QAw&q=%22devilish+jews%22&oq=%22devilish+jews%22&gs_l=psy-ab.3…2388.3168.0.3624.4.4.0.0.0.0.166.602.0j4.4.0….0…1c..64.psy-ab..0.2.330…0i7i30k1j0i8i7i30k1.0.25lKnkzR530
It seems Jewgle can’t still hide completely the truth.
But one wonders why are nazis so little diabolical?
If you ask me : These “Semites” should stay among themselves, and we Germanics stay among ourselves. It could be so simple. Why do this brood undermine and destroy us?
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Arabic+Vs.+Hebrew
Stupid question, “why”: Cause of course they gain an
ADVANTAGE from our disadvantage. Otherwise they
would finally f* off from our societies with their fatal
destruction.
Of the 28 comments in this thread, 20 are from you (!). Keep it all in one post and stop flooding the fucking comment sections with your spam posts, you fucking sperg.
RUSSIA ! RUSSIA ! RUSSIA !
my boy Putin won another 6 or MRGA !
Putin is not eternal. Being russian nationalists and pro-westerner, I hope he does not survive his fourth (fifth) presidency.
You traitors should be thrown in the Gulag !
Is it sarcasm? Why i am traitor? Did I personally take an oath of allegiance to Putin?
>thrown in the Gulag !
Are you fuckin communist?
> Opposes Putin
> Doesn’t want to end up in Gulag.
Lol you’re worst than Ukrainian terrorists.
answer my question, you, another pro-putin retard on this resource: why am I a traitor and whom did I betray? And how is this related to the fact that I’m a Russian pro-western nationalist and I think that Putin is midget piece of shiet? And why ukrainians are terrorists?
answer my question, you, another pro-putin retard on this resource: why am I a traitor and whom did I betray? And how is this related to the fact that I’m a Russian pro-western nationalist and I think that Putin is midget piece of shiet? And why ukrainians are terrorists?
Don’t double post.
Putin IS Russia ! Pro Western you say ? Pro the people who want Russia dead ? Traitor !
Ukrainians stopped Russians in Crimea from voting under the threat of violence, that’s terrorism.
I’m sorry that I did not answer for so long. I had problems with the Internet. Can I ask the question: what nationality are you and what country are you a native and a resident? Just unlike you and other visitors altright.kom I was born and raised in Russia under Putin’s regime, and I see everything there from within, not in pink glasses. И если ты действительно жил или живешь в России, то должен знать русский язык и перевести, что я сейчас написал без Гугл-переводчика.
Now let’s analyze your bullshit by the points:
> Putin IS Russia
First, Russia was well before of Putin (for example, the Yeltsin rule, which I consider to be the best in the last 100 years) and will be after it. I repeat: Putin is not a white overlord, who was called upon to save Europe, but simply a ex-KGB dwarf who came to power and established his rotten, corrupt regime.
Secondly, why do you think that Putin consider the interests of Russia and the Russians? He does not care about his people, he and his gang just plunder their country. And so that the population does not pay attention to this, Putin and his media create an image of an external enemy: the USA, the West, NATO, Ukraine, Poland, Saakashvili’s Georgia, etc. Everything is like in Orwell’s 1984: Eurasia (Russia) is constantly at war with Oceania (abstract West, especially USA). But all this propaganda is aimed at the downtrodden internal population, who for the most part did not communicate with any living American, but believes that they (Americans and other westerners) only dream of destroying Russia and therefore the people should rally around Putin. And you, foreign altriters, for the current Russian regime are just useful idiots who brainwashed by RT. How long ago the Soviet Union brainwashed the left / socialist useful idiots in the West with the newspaper “Pravda”.
> Pro Western you say? Pro the people who want Russia dead? Traitor!
This is one of the many myths among my stupid fellow citizens (and no less stupid foreign altruities, as I see it). I can not understand one thing: if the West allegedly wanted to destroy Russia, then why did not he do it in 1917 during the civil war as in Syria? Or in 1991, when Russia was the most economically, militarily, politically weak? In fact, the West benefits from territorial unified Russia, even under the Putin regime. Because when Putin’s gang plunder Russia, all capitals is deduced to the West (offshore, bying real estate, etc.). And do not worry about the leakage of nuclear weapons. All that the West wanted from Putin, that he touched other countries (especially the former Soviet Union). But Putin periodically violated the status quo. First there was Estonia in 2007 during the demolition of a bronze soldier. Then Georgia and the war in South Ossetia 2008. And only after the Crimea and the war in Donbass in 2014 and Syria-2015 West lost patience and decided to put Russia on the same board of shame along with the DPRK and Iran.
> Ukrainians stopped Russians in Crimea from voting under the threat of violence, that’s terrorism.
So you think that an attempt to preserve the territorial integrity of your country from the annexation of its territory by another state is terrorism? OK. Then what would you say if the Mexican government will introduce its troops in south Texas (El Paso), or in New Mexico under the pretext of protecting their Mexican tribesmen from Trump’s fascist regime and the fact that these states were originally Mexican territory (US invaded these territories have Mexico in 1846-48)?
Heimbach already had a violent issue at a Trump rally when he got involved with some black woman protesting Trump.
While Heimbach’s personal bravery is not in doubt, we need leaders in control of their own emotions. Spencer has never been disgraced in public like other leaders, to his credit.
The plight of South African farmers is truly an issue that can “Unite the Right” and the Alt Right would be wise to organize charity drives to remove South African Whites from danger and repatriate them to sympathetic countries (Hungary, Poland, Australia?).
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/global-opinions/wp/2018/03/16/australias-trump-thinks-south-africas-white-farmers-need-saving/?utm_term=.e307528c3a70
The left is saying that South African farmers bring murdered is an Alt Right meme. Because it is. We are engaging in culture jamming and now leaders of Western countries are seeing the writing on the wall.