Italian Mayor Thinks It’s “Beautiful” To Be “Invaded By Migrants”

Submitted by Michael Alexander

It seems each day brings forth new displays of a governing elite totally removed from its people.

This time, it’s the mayor of Palermo, the capital city of Sicily.  This area of the Mediterranean has seen waves upon waves of third-world migrants flooding the shores, posing as refugees, and taking over communities.  The citizens of Italy are outraged, but their leaders view the nightmare as a dream come true.  As mayor Leoluca Orlando put it, “a very beautiful thing happened, we were invaded by immigrants.”

“If you ask me how many immigrants there are in Palermo, I do not answer 60, 70 or 80,000.  Anyone who arrives in Palermo is a Palermo.”

In his opinion, there is no such thing as an Italian, a Sicilian, or a native Palermo citizen.  The future belongs neither to national businesses nor to the Italian people.  Instead, as he openly stated, “the future has two names: Google and Ali the immigrant.”  As Google, an avidly multicultural company, is in the midst of being sued for systemic discrimination against white males, it makes perfect sense that Palermo’s mayor would choose them as the corporation to lead the replacement of Matteos with Mohammeds.

The mayor’s candid views stand in stark contrast to those of the Italian people.  According to Pew Research, 77% of Italian citizens disapprove of the overall handling of the refugee issue, only 17% approve.  60% believe incoming refugees will increase the risk of terrorism, only 28% disagree.  65% consider certain groups of refugees, namely Syrians and Iraqis, as a “major threat.”  Though diversity is being shoved down everyone’s throat by the European Union, the media, and the political classes, 53% of Italians are wholly opposed to the idea, believing diversity makes Italy “a worse place to live.”  Only a mere 18% of Italians think diversity is an improvement.

So how is it possible that there’s this colossal divide between the people and their politicians?  Isn’t Italy a democracy?  The theory and promise of this system is that the will of the citizenry shall be voted on and implemented.  Yet it seems the people of Italy have been discarded, and the only agenda taking root is that of the utopian elite, the media, and lifelong political hacks.

This phenomenon highlights an eternal flaw of civic nationalism, classical liberalism, Americanism, liberal democracy, etc.  These ideologies place all of their faith in inanimate political systems, without any interest in who is running these systems.  How useful are human rights when your town is being overrun by migrant rape gangs and thieves who don’t believe in them?  What good is the Constitution when any leftist 9th Circuit judge can overrule it, costing you millions to reclaim your rights in court?  If the Left ever takes over the Supreme Court, the Constitution will do nothing to save you.  And voting?  Your vote only changes which elitist center-left or center-right party is going to ignore you and the interests of your family.

Ideas like civic nationalism are noble, but they’re ultimately hollow due to this naivé love of systems and refusal to talk about people, culture, and identity.  If their perfect system is ever overtaken by the corrupt and the disloyal, as is currently the case, that very system becomes the means of their own disenfranchisement – as much of an existential threat to the people as is anarchy.

That said, despite the dejection one may feel when reading about this topic and the treasonous comments of the mayors in the West, there is a silver lining.  There is hope.  The elite’s agenda, of replacing the European people they can’t control with new migrants they can, relies heavily on the public’s ignorance.  With the rise of social media, nationalist movements, and the Alt-Right, the elite has been forced to make their awkward arguments out in the open, where they likely will not stand up to scrutiny.  No people goes willingly towards their own extinction.  The rhetoric from mayors like Orlando may get worse, but this does not symbolize the end for us.

It may mean we’re steadily approaching the end for them.

Guest Writer
the authorGuest Writer


  • Truth about Sicilians by Dennis Hopper to Christopher Walken in True romance movie.? “Sicilians are niggers.”?
    Greetings from Prague brothers.
    We are figthing for re-elect antimigrant president now,against new Söros candidate.We win and Central Europe will not capitulate.

  • Elections in Italy are coming up on March 4 and predictions are that Matteo Salvini of Lega Nord will make major gains. A shift to the right is anticipated.

  • The people promoting this are criminals, and need to be held accountable in the same manner.

    In past times we hung criminals and traitors whether in or out of office. That must return if justice is to be restored

  • I just don’t get it??!!
    The entire place is a democracy (not just Italy but all of Europe).
    Why do the elect such leaders?
    I guess they want to go extinct.

    • That’s the problem: they’re are a democracy. They destroyed the aristocratic principle. Inferior races band together in great numbers. Haven;t you ever noticed how hyenas wait until nightfall to take down the lions in a pride?

  • Sicilians.
    On the other hand you have that high rep. of The Northern League, looking as white as General Custer who is now under fire for saying , just a few days , during a radio interview: ” If we don’t put a stop to this our WHITE race and culture is over ” , why not reporting on that one ?>

  • Do you really believe that these burnt pizzas are going to save Italy? Haven’t you ever noticed how they smell and go around gangs and fight. They’re Euroniggers.

    • And this is why people bash Anglos. Theres a lot of talk about the Jewish problem in the AR, but not nearly enough about the Anglo problem. Not talking about it for the sake of solidarity with “muh huwhyte brothers” is self defeating. The AQ is of equal if not greater importance to the JQ tbh.

      • Ignore this guy he’s divisive that is all, he’s certainly no leader let alone a true Aryan and I don’t care how much pure Nordic blood he claims to have, I’ll personally take an honest, ho orable Med or Alpine type on my left than a blonde haired dumbass like himself.

        Guys like him will do nothing productive for our movement.

      • Give me a break. Meds bantz Anglos all the time. Catholics bantz Prots far more than the other way around. Don’t cry about it.

        • Whose crying?

          Besides Jews, it’s Anglos who are incontrol of everything. Their not just cucks, which implies powerlessness, but willing accomplices in the dispossession of their own race and it’s high time they start getting called out. Especially if their constantly going to act like insufferable pricks.

      • The AQ *IS* the JQ. The rate of crypsis of jews in Britain is what makes the ‘Eternal Anglo’ – they have taken over all of the institutions.

  • So goes America, go goes Europe. Just as everyone thinks in American English(whose meanings are shaped by Jewish-controlled media), every nation tries to be America-as-Idea. And Diversity is the New Credo.

    Is a Nation(such as America) Just-an-Idea? Is a Person Just-an-Idea?

    It’s a common practice(even habit) among politicians and thinkers(mostly official scribes) to reiterate that America is an Idea or even ‘just an idea’. But is a nation just an idea? Can a nation be just an idea? And if a nation is just an idea, is it no longer a nation if those ideas fade and are replaced by new ones?

    Let’s compare a nation with a person. Just like nations have an official ideology, identity, and/or narrative, every person has set of values and beliefs. So, the person is shaped by those ideas. Therefore, does it follow that the person is those ideas? Of course not. Rather, isn’t he a holder of those ideas or ideals? Isn’t he a believer in certain tenets and principles than the very embodiment of those ideas? If he is those ideas, is he not himself when sleeping and not thinking of those ideas? Even in waking state, is he himself only when he espouses those ideas?

    While ideas and beliefs are very important, a person is primarily his core biological and biographical being. He was himself even before he espoused those ideas, he is himself with those ideas, and he will still be himself even after he has rejected those ideas and moved onto a different creed. Suppose a person claims to be a libertarian or communist. That makes him a person who espouses libertarian principles or communist dogma. So, is he the person = set of ideas? No, he is a person who follows or upholds those ideas. To conflate him-as-core-being with him-as-believer-of-ideas is utterly foolish. If we define people that way, a person is nothing unless he comes into belief in a set of ideas. And he must remain faithful to those ideas because failing to do so will unperson him. Idiotic, right?

    Then, why do we apply such fallacy to the nation of America? If America is an idea(as opposed to a nation that upholds certain ideas, which have changed over the course of its history), then America was not America until those ideas came to fruition & dominance. And America would no longer be America if those ideas were compromised or rejected for new ones. In fact, however, America will always be America no matter what ideas it espouses since America is essentially the land mass between Canada and Mexico(and Alaska and Hawaii) constituting the continuity of a particular civilization that originated and developed from the mass arrival of Europeans.

    Also, using the current PC logic of ideocentrism, America was not America for most if its history. If indeed America is the current set of globalist PC ideas, then it couldn’t have been America since it held onto different ideas, attitudes, and values in the past. Until the mid-1860s, America had slavery, and until the Civil War, the Northern Free States tolerated slavery in the South. Since America then had slavery — ideas at odds with freedom — , America must not have been America. We are told that America cannot be ‘racist’. But America wouldn’t exist if not for ‘racism’. White Europeans conquered America and drove out the native peoples who came to be called ‘Indians’. And there were race wars between whites and reds where the former prevailed. Also, until 1965, American immigration policy favored Europeans, especially Northern Europeans, over other peoples. Since the ideas back then were very much at odds with current Ideas(that are said to define True America), America must not have been America in the past, at least prior to 1965 when the Immigration Policy was changed by Jews.

    Some have said America is a Christian nation. Some revised it to Judeo-Christian nation. It is true enough that America, as founded, was an overwhelmingly Christian Protestant nation. There’s no doubt that Christianity has been culturally and historically important to America. But is America = Christianity? But the Founding Fathers were Deists who were skeptical of Biblical claims. And they thought Jesus was a great man than a Son of God. If America = Christianity, it was founded by remarkable men who were not the most committed Christians. Also, many Americans of prominence were agnostics or atheists.

    While ideas and values matter a great deal, a nation is much more than that. Nations are like people in this sense. If Bob and John are both libertarians, are they the same? After all, they believe in the same ideas. If nations are ideas, why shouldn’t we say humans are ideas too? So, Bob and John would be interchangeable since they are both ideas of libertarianism. But we know this is not true. Even if Bob and John believe in a certain ideology, they are more than what they believe. Also, even when people espouse the same ideology, they interpret and practice it differently. There are no two same Christians. Each person responds to Jesus in his or her own way. And each person came to libertarianism in his own way. And he practices libertarianism in his own way due to factors of intelligence, integrity, character, personality, happenstance, and circumstances. So, a person has a being and story beyond any set of beliefs.
    Furthermore, an idea changes over time and can evolve to the point where it has little semblance of its original self. It’s like meanings of words change over time, even to the point of meaning something profoundly different from its original usage. Consider how the Greek term ‘tyrant’ didn’t necessarily have negative connotations but came to mean an evil oppressive ruler. Indeed, even Liberal Americans of the past would not recognize today’s so-called ‘liberalism’. And Progressives 100 yrs ago, or even 50 yrs ago, would be appalled at much of what passes for ‘progressivism’ today. And Conservatives from 50 yrs ago would find nothing conservative about current Conservatism Inc. that’s mostly about “Democrats are the real racists” and “Muh Israel”.

    Just like every person is more than the ideas he believes, a nation is more than the ideas it upholds and practices. If America is an idea, then it would follow that any other nation that shares those ideas are also ‘America’. If America is about democracy and tolerance, then isn’t Mexico also ‘America’ since it is also a tolerant democracy? Isn’t Germany also ‘America’ since it is democratic? Isn’t Brazil also America because of its democracy?
    As for ‘diversity’, it can be an ideal or a condition. A nation can be diverse in actuality but not see diversity as a good thing. A nation can be homogeneous but see diversity as a desired ideal. Many diverse nations are not happy with their diversity and plagued with tensions. Some nations have traditionally been homogeneous but came under Jewish PC influence and feel inadequate because they are not ‘diverse’ enough. So, they welcome Africans and Muslims to increase diversity. Current Sweden believes Sweden = Ideal of Diversity. Since the new mandatory Idea = Diversity, many Swedes don’t believe Sweden was True Sweden in the past. True Sweden can only be created via adherence to the idea of Diversity. See how utterly stupid this line of thinking is? If indeed Sweden = Diversity, are Peru and Morocco ‘Sweden’ since they have Diversity?

    Furthermore, if we claim that America is America ONLY IF it commits to the current PC of ‘anti-racism’, then even the America of either political party is not that True America. After all, both parties support Zionist-imperialist-supremacist repression of Palestinians. If True America must not play favorites among racial, ethnic, or national groups, why does the current US favor Zionists over Palestinians? Why does it favor Israel(that has 200 nuclear weapons) to Iran(that adheres to international nuclear agreements and has no nukes)? And why do the national Media favor Jews, blacks, and homos over other groups IF INDEED America is all about ‘equality’ and not about ‘playing favorites’? And if all peoples and groups are equally valuable, why must all peoples be made to support Jews/Zionism and Homomania BUT Jews and Homos are not required to support, praise, or celebrate Mormons, Palestinian-Americans? Or Chinese-Americans, Russian-Americans, German-Americans, or Incest-Sexuals? And if America is about using its might to remind us of past injustices, why is there no Nakba Remembrance Day? And if America is about waging war on its ‘racist’ past, why is the South attacked for Confederate monuments but the North isn’t condemned for its ‘genocidal’ wars against Indians? And if America is all about ‘tolerance’ and ‘diversity’, why does it honor the memory of Emma Lazarus who fully endorsed Manifest Destiny and called on more Europeans and Jews to come to America and grab remaining Indian territories by killing Indians or reducing them to wretched huddled masses in barren reservations?

    If America is an idea, it is not America whenever it violates those principles. So, America could not have been America during WWII since its media called Japanese ‘Japs’ — how ‘racist’!! — and since the government rounded up Japanese-in-America for ‘internment’. Some German-Americans, tens of thousands of them, were also ‘interned’. Since the US violated its ideals, it must not have been America back then.

    Now, certain ideas and values have become so ingrained or instituted into a nation or civilization that there is a tendency to conclude: Identity + Place = Ideas + Values. But the core identity of a people in a place is always more than any set of ideas and values. China was a Confucian Civilization for a long long time. But was it no longer China because Chinese Communists waged war on Confucianism? No, China was China even under the ideology of Maoists. Current China dearly loves businessmen who get rich. But Confucianism despised the merchant class. If China = Confucian Ideas, then current China is not China since the current ideas and values are so much at odds with traditional Confucian moralism.
    Now, take the Turks. For the longest time, Turks were defined by Islam. But Kemal Ataturk came along and created modern secular Turkey where religion was banished from much of public life and state affairs. So, were modern Turks no longer Turks since Turkishness = Islam? Atarturkism proved that there is more to Turkishness than what Turks believe as credo.
    Same goes for Greeks. Ancient Greeks were pagans. Then, they became Christians. Since their ideas and credos changed, were they no longer Greeks? Or did Greek become True Greeks only as Christians? But, if Greekness = Christian Credo, are Greeks no longer Greek if they become atheist or secular?

    Ideas matter but they are not the core of an identity. Under communism, the Soviet authorities insisted that Russia and its Soviet Republics were all defined by an Idea. Soviet Union was a Proposition Empire of Marxism-Leninism. But if that is True Russia, was Russia not Russia prior to the Revolution when it had espoused different ideas and values? And did Russia cease to be Russia when the Soviet Union collapsed and communism was no longer the Propositional Idea of Russians?

    The fact is cradle matters more than credo. Each person exists because he was born and develops a biography. That existence is the core essential self. Now, ideas and values are very important because humans live with beliefs and principles. But a person is a person, he is himself, regardless of what he believes. John is John as a libertarian. If he chooses to reject libertarianism and adopt communtarianism, he is still John. And even if he changes his name to ‘Muhammad’, he is still his biological self who was born of his parents. Even as ‘Muhammad’, he is the person who was born to such and such parents and was named John, experienced a unique personal history that led him to current set of beliefs that led him to change his name to ‘Muhammad’.

    This much is true. Bad ideas or attitudes lead to degradation and demise of a person or nation. Hedonism will destroy a person. Fanaticism can destroy him too. And radical ideologies can bring about hell on earth to nations. Also, crude impulses can ruin a person like crazed personalities can destroy a nation. Take National Socialism. It had good ideas and bad ideas. Its good idea was nationalism and German revival, its bad idea was imperialism and racial chauvinism. What really destroyed Germany wasn’t so much the ideas but the crazed personalities who impulsively acted on the worst ideas of National Socialism. (Even systems with bad ideas can be steered safely by sane personalities. Gorbachev and Deng took over systems founded on radical ideas but steered them to moderation and world peace. If someone like Albert Speer had gained control of National Socialist Germany, wars would have been avoided.) Personalities of a nation are like impulses in a person. If a person’s neurons go haywire and go for short-term impulses than long-term sobriety, a man or woman can be lost to drugs or debauchery. Likewise, if a nation indulges the most radical, fanatical, or crazed personalities to to pursue their egotistical or tribal lusts without restraint, the result is something like US embroilment in Wars for Israel that laid waste to the Arab/Muslim world and destroyed millions of lives, resulting in the massive flood of Europe with ‘refugees’ as well. Another result is the ‘new cold war’ with Russia on the premise that the entire world exists mainly to serve the megalomania of Jewish supremacists who hypocritically mask their ultra-tribalism and egotism with platitudes about ‘spreading democracy’, ‘liberal democracy’, and ‘human rights’.

    One of the worst and most dangerous ideas is to put credo before cradle or to conflate cradle with credo. Such assumption says a person’s ideas are more important that the person. Indeed, we are believe he is the idea. Using such logic, he is no longer a person unless he espouses certain ideas. He is unpersoned if he were to question or reject those ideas. Likewise, globalists threaten to un-nation America unless it commits to the ideas of Emma Lazarus.
    But then, even if we play by rules of PC, are Lazarusean ideas really in line with Current PC that claims to be the True America? Wasn’t Emma Lazarus an imperialist and ethno-supremacist? After all, more European and Jewish immigration to America meant the expulsion of American Indians from their ancestral lands. If America is about ‘tolerance’ and ‘diversity’, didn’t Lazarusean ethos violate those principles since continued mass arrival of Europeans and white Jews made America less ‘red’(Indian) and more white? Jews say their ancestors ran from pogroms in Eastern Europe, but wasn’t America created by ‘pogroms’ against Indians, just like Israel was created later with massive pogroms against Palestinians in the Nakba?
    Furthermore, if Americanism is about atonement for its ‘racist’ past, why does the current America support Israel that was created by imperialism, pogromic ethnic cleansing, & destruction of Palestine and, furthermore, occupies West Bank & practices Apartheid there? If America is an Ideal that requires feeling guilty over Jim Crow and once-alliance with apartheid-practicing South Africa, why is it so un-repenting of its historical ‘sins’ against Palestinians? And if America is about equality, why is there more ‘white guilt’ for what was done to blacks than what was done to American Indians? Surely, ‘genocide’ is a bigger crime than slavery.

    When we look at Current America, it’s less about an idea than an agenda(driven by the zealous ego of an ethnic tribe). If America is really an idea as this ethnic tribe claims, why don’t the members of this tribe practice these ideas themselves? If whites must forgo their racial identity and interests to serve the higher idea of True America, why don’t Jews forgo their identity and tribal interests to just merge with all other Americans? Why do Jews tell European-Americans that it’s wrong to preserve and serve European identity but insist that not only Jews but all gentile groups must support, praise, and serve Jewish identity, Jewish heritage, Zionist Israel, and Wars for Israel? Why do Jews insist that all non-Jews must worship Jews-as-Jews. Worse, why do they insist that all non-Jews must hate peoples and nations hated by Jews? So, if Jews hate Russians, all gentiles(even Russians) must hate Russians. If Jews hate Iranians, all gentiles(even Iranians) must hate Iranians. So much for America being an Idea. That ‘idea’ in Current America is just a ruse used by the Agenda serving the Ego of a rabid, virulent, and fanatical ethnic tribe.

    Finally, if indeed America is an Idea, there is no need for people to come to America. Ideas are portable and transferable. If American Ideas are the best, then the rest of the world can adopt and use those ideas. It’s like, if a people learn how to make fire, that idea can be borrowed by other peoples who can make their own fires in their own lands. They don’t have to come to the people with the fire to have the fire.
    It’s like one doesn’t have to go to Mecca to be a Muslim or go to the Vatican to become a Catholic. Islam and Catholicism are ideas or creed. They can be adopted by any people in any part of the world.
    So, even if we argue America = Idea, the world can just adopt Americanism-as-Idea in their own nations. There is no need for them to flood into America. Also, if democracy was a precious commodity in the 19th century, it is dime-a-dozen all over the world. Most nations are democracies around the world. Besides, much of the world has been ‘Americanized’ with McDonalds, Hollywood, Evangelicalism, and even Homomania. They can have their ‘America’ in their own nations.

  • Southern Italy has a mongrel problem, the North is where it’s at. At this point Sicily’s been invaded by everyone at some point. #MakeSicilyNormanAgain

    • All of Italy has had a mongrel problem since the original population stopped having enough children to replace themselves during the jewish banking enlightenment.

      Show me an “Italian” that isn’t a greasy guinea. A katzenfresser.

      • It’s liek finding a “Mexican” who is actually still of Nordic Spanish blood. It’s like finding a pearl in a pigsty.

        • One is not obligated to talk about things he does not know at all.
          There is no pressure or rush from nobody in showing own’s ignorance

        • Here :

          3 Italians girls on the top 3 spots of skiing , downhill specialty , world cup just a couple days ago.
          Take a look at the whole team ,the whole 20 people or so sample, which makes up the team, made up of coaches , boyfriends etc. celebrating at the end of the video .

          By the way , they are NOT alpine ,Germanic type of Italian populations , no , they are simply northern Italians , like me.
          As you can see from their very Italian ,latin sounding names .

          They are ALL AND EACH white under any possible ,imaginable standard of whiteness:
          Simply looking very white skinned
          Any scientifical ,DNA tests.
          Anglo , North american standards ,these Italians would heve never gotten the ” not as white as us and swarthy looking ” treatment that Sicilians and neapolitan immgrants to America got at the beginng of the 20th century when they emigrated to the USA.
          EVEN a generic ,cultural ” evolian spiritual racism ” type of view point , meaning :
          They do exactly the typical things WHITE PEOPLE DO (winter sports ) .
          And very well in this case , by the way.
          You do know that Giulio Evola was Italian right ?

          • This guy isn’t worth a hair on the great Baron’s ass cheek. Evola was of the purest Aryan spirit one can find but since he was not pale with a pinkish undertone and since he possessed brown eyes, this troll would call him non white, GTFO.
            I say this as a 75% Anglo-German, 25% Italian with blue eyes and a ruddy, pinkish complexion, so no real bias for or against on my end.

            Hell, I, more than likely pass more Nordic than this faggot, but even so, Nordicism has no place in our movement, certainly not now, nor in the near future. We are all white, we’re all brothers and cousins and any sub group preference or superiority is divisive and will end in our failure.

            Don’t feed the troll bro.

          • Yes , I will take the advice in not feeding the troll, but I think the video pics help in putting the case to rest .
            I mean …who would be so insane to see some similarity there with East LA ?
            Not only from a purely racial standpoint ( and the video does that beautifully ) but also from an evolian , spiritually racist standpoint.
            Africans and Amerindi have PLENTY of snow available.
            But something as adventurous and tough as going on the top of a mountain , organize in detail and then skying well it’s just not in their spirit.

          • Oh no doubt.
            I had a decent back and forth with this guy on the other thread and I learned that he’s either ignorant or a purposeful troll

            Like I told him though, my father is very Nordic looking though he has brown hair. My mother who is half Italian, half german looks very similar to Catherine zeta jones ( pull up a google image search) while her sister is blonde hair blue eyed, ruddy and very Nordic looking. I took after my father and my brother, my mother.
            Ironically both my female cousins( my mom’s sisters kids) who are sisters have the same deal, one blonde the other brunette, brown eyed.
            How does a ” blonde, blue eyed only” Nordicist rationalize that.

            So this shit is a lot more complex than these Bavarian phenotype fags make them out to be. We’re all white, we’re all European and we all want to rule the world. That’s enough.
            After we cleanse our lands of the juden and the blacks and browns and once we have global supremacy again, if we want to all split along ethnic lines, so be it, but not now.
            We’re a global minority.

          • Half Italian. That says it all. I had a feeling about you. I was trying to call you out when I referred to you as one of us.

          • 1/4 Italian but even if i was full Italian my left nut would still be worth more than you.
            There’s nothing aristocratic about the way you present yourself on this forum.

            Like I said before, you better hope I don’t decide to become leader, I have it in me, and if I was, I would hang you right next to the shitlib and the Jew, and in between the nigger and the spic.

            I don’t care for blonde hair if the man sporting it is a piece of trash, lowly peasant.

          • I meant Northern Italy is better than Southern Italy, not Northern Europe is better than Italy as a whole.

          • It’s not so much the north or south, it’s just the individual homes and families. I know of certain good nord blood families in Italy, but they don’t socialize much outside a very tight society, so you don’t see them much.

            Italy has had the same problem as all other civilized countries: high blood women just don’t have many children. My sister had two and now she just sleeps all day in multimillion dollar house.

            My point was not that you can’t find good raical specimens. My point is that they are ever more rare.

          • “these Italians would heve never gotten the ” not as white as us and swarthy looking ” treatment that Sicilians and neapolitan immgrants to America got”

            North and South Italians look the SAME:


            “They do exactly the typical things WHITE PEOPLE DO (winter sports ) .”

            LOL Because they live near the Alps. Irish people don’t do winter sports. Are they not white? Are Chinese white because they do winter sports? smh

      • Right here .
        Most probably looking whiter than you buddy ,scoring 100% anyways and I am not some kind of “strange case of whiteness ” in Northern Italy at all.
        Norhthern Italy is a 100 % white nation period.

        • You must be joking! Milan, Florence and Bologna are racial disaster areas. Even Ravenna, the city of Theodoric, is full of negroes.

          • I thought anybody understood I wasn’t talking about modern immigrants but original , native northern Italians.

    • You guys really need to stop with this nonsense. I’m of Sicilian and Neopolitan descent. Italians are one of the most homogenous European populations in Europe.

      Unless is trolling me, I’m 96% Mediterranean (90% Italian and 16% Balkan) and 4% “other European”. Germany has more sub-Saharan admixture than the Italian peninsula if you look at the actual population genetics.

      Italy also has one of the highest national IQs in Europe.

      • It looks good ,the right is going to probably win somehow the general .
        But it is both a regional and ..simply an on line poll ,with no Lega Nord present.
        Limited in every possible and imaginable ways of limitations and non credibility

        • I know. Lega Nord is present. I posted the link to the poll underneath, as opposed to the screenshot above. The Communist party is the number two. And when the fringe parties are #1 and #2 you know it isn’t an accurate representation of the general population.

          Casapound got 9% of the vote in the recent Municipal election in Ostia, and that is probably closer to what they’ll get in the general election. Like I said before if they make some inroads into Parliament I’ll be happy.

    • the Sicilians like all southern Italians ARE ARABS in the BLOOD and MUZZLE!
      Just look at the photos.

      According to you these are white ???
      the inhabitants of the center and above all of the north are WHITES

      • Bullshit all arabs where kicked of sicily a long time ago and were killes or enslaved some of my family comes from sicily and are very white you obviously haven’t studied southern italy or sicilys history at all

        • Agreed, though there are some who have arab admixture. Now, tbc, when I say this I mean,a few, like a very small minority.
          DNA tests can confirm this, but to say that all of southern Italy and Sicily is Arab is total horseshit, it’s probably 1 in a few thousand, at the most. I’m a 1/4 Italian( half of which comes from southern Italy)and there are quite a few blue eyed blondes on my Italian/german side. That wouldn’t happen if my southern Italian ancestor was “Arab”, even with the german mixed in.

          I am myself a bit of a Nordicist, not in that I think Nords are superior, just that I like a lot of Nordic culture(British, German, etc), but some of these Nordicists think anyone who isn’t blonde is non white. Smdh.

    • Got to give it to us , we do come up with SOME ideas here and there.
      Just look at the city this guy is mayor of:
      Venice .
      And a few more maybe worth mentioning , like for example :
      ” Fascism “.
      Or ,from Lorenzo il Magnifico :
      Banking , but with Jews excluded from the whole trade .
      By law.

Leave a Reply