Marijuana Makes You a Leftist

Alcohol kills people. Pot doesn’t. You’re being a faggot.

This article is not accurate. Or perhaps I’m the odd one that breaks the mold on this argument as I’ve smoked pot every single day (with some breaks lasting 1-4 months here and there)for probably 10 years. I’ve got a solid job and because my parents (still married )instilled a work ethic in myself as well as my siblings, I’ve had a job from the age of 13(I’m 30). I’m active. I lift weights and have on and off my entire adult life as well as my later teen’s. I’ve played an instrument consistently for 20 years. Played various live gigs (as I enjoy performing ,it sort of comes with the musician territory). I would also venture to say pot opened my mind up to different subjects of interest that I may not have been interested in had I not ever smoked. It opened my mind enough to look into the altright. Or perhaps before that it opened my mind up enough to read between the lines as to news/media. As far as smoking weed making men more feminine this may or may not be true. The nature of men in current and the millienial generation is definitely more feminine, and id venture to say perhaps the amount of people smoking or using marijuana products have increased since say 50 years ago. There could lie a valid argument although, I highly doubt it’s the root cause of this upward spike in mens femininity. Also my counter argument for myself for being a daily user (speaking for my younger days of course but still could and would be relevant) and not being femine is I loved to fight. Again, more in my younger days but none the less. Maybe this is just something all men go through when they are youngish and proud. Maybe me and my friends liked fighting ??the real truth is smoking pot is waaaayyy more popular among millienials as well as safer. Maybe the article is correct and I’m the odd man…

This seems to be addressed exclusively to men. Sounds like pot is a great tool for women to become more feminine . Or should women also aspire to become masculine?

>According to a report in the Journal of the American Medical Association, states with medical cannabis laws on average reduced opioid overdose deaths by 24.8%. And each year after the medical cannabis law was passed, the rate of opioid overdose deaths continued to decrease.

Show me the successful dope smoker and I’ll show you half a dozen lazy drop outs. Dope does have a negative impact on our society and you’d have to be blind or a dope head to not see it.

What about coffee.

What about states rights? Or does that only apply to defending slavery?

Alcohol diminishes testosterone levels too, and turns people into hedonistic, drooling slobs. All things are fine in moderation, and too much of anything is bad. Sessions is wrong. Weed > Alcohol.

Why are homos so devious and powerful? Because they have both masculine instinct and feminine intuition. Their approach to power is passive/aggressive. They have elegantly refined the art of power like a sharpened blade. It’s like the Tim Roth character in ROB ROY. He’s cat-like. Pound for pound, cats are the most deadly predators. They are more agile and efficient in movement than any dog or bear. He’s aggressive and vicious but also skilled and masterly. So fine-tuned. Manly types tend to be overly brutish in their use of power. They are overly obvious. Womanly types tend to be too yielding and soft. But homos have masculine toughness sharped by feminine touch.

Jewish Power is the same way. Jews are passive/aggressive. They are pushy and dig into their opponents. But because most Jews are not he-man types, they rely on verbal skills, wit, and mugging for sympathy. It’s like the saying, “Jew cries out in pain as he hits you.” Jews are the ruling elites in the US. They use media to denounce, demean, and defame white gentiles but when white gentiles complain about such nasty treatment, Jews scream ‘antisemite!!’.

Homo deviousness can be seen in the way they frame their arguments. Homos bitch that ‘homophobes’ interfere in other people’s private affairs — what happens in the bedroom — , but this is totally bogus.

Few people in this day and age are ‘God Hates Fag’ types who want to ban sodomy or burn homos at the stake. Even conservatives acknowledge the right of homos to be homo and do their own thing, esp as GOP is filled with homo politicians.
So, no one has problems with homos coming out of the closet and doing their own thing in the privacy of their bedrooms.

The real issue is that homos have now come out of their bedrooms and turned entire streets, schools, and entertainment into displays of homo perversion and/or homo holiness. Homos are funny this way.
On the one hand, they take pride in being wild and crazy flaming homos. They claim to be edgy, daring, and devil-may-care breakers of taboos. They take pride in their flamboyant debauchery and decadence. Homos present themselves as self-indulgent orgy-porgers who’ve built neo-sodom-and-gomorrah.

But homos, being so vain and self-aggrandizing, aren’t content to only be the queens of excess and hedonism. They also want to be objects of sanctimonious worship as well. So, even as one side of homo agenda celebrates the wild degenerate porny side of homosexuality, another side goes into ‘father knows best’ and presents homos as more-normal-than-normal, more whitebread than whitebread, more suburban-than-suburban, more squeaky-clean-than-squeaky-clean. You’d think you’re watching homo leave-it-to-beaver and ozzie-and-harriet.

Also, even as homos indulge in sodom-and-gomorroh-like-behavior, they also infiltrate christian churches and turn them into dens of homo-worship.

And consider the AIDS epidemic. It resulted from homos acting like crazy degenerates buggering one another in bathhouses. But instead of taking responsibility, homos would have us believe they were victims of ‘homophobic indifference’ and, as such, holy martyrs like Tom Hanks in PHILADELPHIA.

Jews are the same way. Too many Jews acted like Bernie Madoff and destroyed the economy in 2008, but they bitch about how ‘antisemitism’ is targeting all these wonderful Jews who are trying to fix the economy.
Jews also claim to be champions of free speech but seek to shut down any speech critical of Jewish power as ‘hate speech’.

And blacks are the same way. Blacks revel in thug culture of rap and pimp-gangsterism. They present themselves as crazy thugs and murderers. They glamorize that stuff.
But they also wrap themselves in MLK symbolism and act as if they’re Magic Negroes and eternal victims and champions of peace.
BLM is hilarious. Blacks kill other blacks and rob/murder so many non-blacks, but they act like blacks are the main victims of non-black violence.

But then, such hypocrisy is part of Americanism. America is an imperialist nation and empire… but it goes around promoting itself as a ‘democracy’ for ‘human rights’. That must be why US destroyed Libya, which now has open-air slave markets.

Even though homosexuality was frowned upon in most cultures throughout history, homos cannot be seen as a ‘victim’ group like others.

The reason for this is there is no autonomous and self-sustaining homo community. A Jewish community can exist on its own and sustain itself as Jewish. Chinese can do the same. Also true of Turks and Iranians. Greek community can create more Greeks via childbirth and culturalization.

But this isn’t true of homos. For starters, homosexuality cannot create life. No matter how many guys hump other guys in the bung, no life will be created. No life was ever created by lesbians rubbing poons together. So, homos, every single one of them, are the products of real sex by real-sexuals, aka heterosexuals.
So, homos on their own cannot sustain homo community.

Also, it’s impossible to tell where the next homo will come from. Even if a homo man and a homo woman have reluctant sex together, the chances are their kid will be straight than homo. But then, a very masculine straight man and very feminine straight woman can have sex together and produce a homo kid.

Unlike other groups that are self-sustaining and auto-generating, homos can’t predict where the next homo will arise. An Amish community can keep producing new Amish. But even in an all-homo community where homo men have reluctant sex with homo women, the chances are their kids will be straight than homo.

Because we don’t know where the next homo will come from, homos have been born into every group. So, some homos were born into a slave family. But other homos were born into slave-owning family. Some homos were born white, some were born black, some were born Asian, some were born Hindu, etc. Some homos were born to kings and grew up as privileged princes who exploited serfs and poor folks. Aristocratic homos sexually exploited their servants. Even though Nazi Germany was anti-homo, some homos were born into Nazi families, and if Nazi Germany had survived, these elite closet-homos would have oppressed and killed Polacks.

Because of the quantum nature of homo-ness, the homo community is very unstable. It never knows where the next homo will be born and to whom. We know that many Jews will be born in Israel to Jewish parents. But we don’t know which parents will give birth to the new batch of homos. A homo may be born to two extremely religious parents who believe homosexuality is a great sin. A homo may be born to capitalists or socialists. A homo may be born to Tibetan Buddhists or Saudi Muslims.

This is why homos are drawn to globalism. Because each homo is born in isolation and without intention(on part of parents), he or she must look far and wide to construct and be part of a homo community. A homo community is not self-generating but exists only by pulling together isolated homos from all over the nation or the world. So, homos have been adept at creating networks, and that led to worldwide power.
—————

Well, there is a difference between introspection and navelgazing. And right-wing drug would be amphetamine, SS style.

I found it curious that before Tony Blair and before Obama both the British and American governments issued pamphlets that discussed the medical dangers of marijuana. Those pamphlets referenced some pretty solid research. Now the government websites go very easy on marijuana. It is like the tobaccco companies back in the 40s that hid the risks of tobacco they knew were real, only now the governments are hiding the dangers. Why would they do that?