Perspective

The Descent Of Western Man

Twitter has done wonders for free speech and open, unfettered debate in its short lifespan. Democracy thrives when people feel free to express themselves, when minds are exposed to new and different ideas. If you can’t even discuss the merits of certain ideas and certain policies, true democratic choice doesn’t exist. In recent years, however, Twitter and many other social media entities, run by vile white-haters and vicious Neo-Bolsheviks, are unhappy with the political results their good deeds and market ingenuity have engendered.

The ADL, the SPLC, and other hate groups are doing their best to squash and/or criminalize dissent and are using censorship to advance their sick leftist agenda, much like they always have. The internet is their new battleground. The internet has exposed these criminal, effectively communist organizations for what they really are and they aren’t happy about it at all. They haven’t been able to exercise the same control over the internet and internet speech that they have historically been able to exercise over the Mainstream Media. So they are now conspiring with and at times strong-arming social media sites into curtailing speech, in a despicable attempt to close up the previously free internet and manipulate democratic outcomes. These are very sick people.

What the SPLC really believes.

Generally speaking, a person does not need to know the source of ideas/claims to analyze or evaluate those ideas/claims. The free flow of information is fantastic for mental plasticity and intellectual growth. Our Cultural Marxist overlords are irate that armies of trolls are at the ready 24 hours a day to expose their lies, hypocrisy and moral inconsistencies, which they peddle to the masses as gospel. One strategem now being floated, in another disgusting attempt to undermine free expression and the free exchange of ideas on the web, is to eliminate anonymity on social media sites.

The reason for this is simple. The Cultural Marxist totalitarians who spend all their free time trying to silence white people who don’t want to genocide themselves, by doxing them, shaming them, getting them fired from their jobs and otherwise enforcing the inherently totalitarian apparatus of thought-crime codes in formerly free, white nations, are very unhappy about not being able to terrorize random internet bloggers and commenters, expose them to physical assault, and frankly ruin their lives over words and thoughts, given that their true identities are unknown. Imagine all the harassment, violence, discrimination, and censorship they could engage in if they just knew who we were!

The world would be a much better place if their hate was the only hate around, since their hate doesn’t count as hate to the anti-white psychopaths in power who agree with them.

These liars argue that this measure will enhance what they call “civility” in the arena of internet dialogue and debate. But they don’t care about “civility”. What they really want is to silence their political opponents under the pretext of enhancing civility. They say they are combating “hate speech”, but it is funny how no matter what blacks, Jews and 3rd Worlders say about whites it is never “hate speech”, and no matter what whites say about non-whites, no matter how mild, no matter how measured, no matter how steeped in raw data or facts, it is always “hate speech”. They don’t want civility. They want us to be silent and helpless as they commit their heinous atrocities against our people.

They want to remove our race from the Earth with as little fanfare as possible.

“Hate speech” is not a valid intellectual concept and never has been. Every criminal regime and every tyrant lording over every miserable, poverty-stricken, underdeveloped (and now miserable, rich, overdeveloped) backwater, populated by worthless primitives and voiceless serfs, justifies the censorship of their political opponents. It is nothing new and it is nothing noble. It is primitive, pathetic, evil. It is a crime against humanity and the real butcher of democracy in most formerly democratic Western nations, such as the UK, Germany, Sweden, et al.

Twitter is foolish in every sense to go along with it, not just from a business standpoint, but from a moral one. It is patently indefensible, and the folly of it is easy to expose if only the censors would let us do so!

 

More anonymity means fewer social repercussions for speech, and so leads to more speech. A lack of speech is the real threat to American democracy, not Russia or Trump or anything of the sort! Speech is fantastic for democracy! It is not fantastic for parasitic oligarchs and would-be tyrants, but for democracy it is fantastic. Twitter blossomed into a haven for free thought and open debate in part due to internet anonymity. It has been almost magical for Western democracies and for the genesis of bona fide choice in selecting Western leaders and in deciding our own fate as sovereign peoples. Indeed, there is even some evidence to suggest that the Flynn Effect is in part a byproduct of exposure to an abundance of data and common logical structures and patterns. In other words, our exposure to new ideas and new concepts may literally boost our IQ’s.

Yet we want to limit our access to only those ideas and concepts that are power-structure approved? This is the height of absurdity.

People are always complaining about how university campuses have devolved into echo chambers for leftist hacks and Marxist nutjobs pining for safe-spaces, and inquiry-free and speech-free zones of left-wing propaganda, where only one narrow narrative is tolerated. The stories coming out of university campuses daily of how intellectual dissidents are being treated there are downright disturbing, almost Sovietesque. What has come of Western academia is downright shameful. Yet I have come across very few actual proposals meant to address these systemic shortcomings and to remedy the current sorry state of Western academia. The reality is, nobody will speak up, nobody will think for themselves, if it means getting expelled or becoming a total outcast for wrong-think.

Universities would do well to incorporate some degree of anonymity into their classrooms and overall academic structure/design. The social and political pressures that are so often hostile to free speech and free inquiry are particularly acute in the highly social, often tightly-knit university setting. When everybody knows everybody and everybody longs for social acceptance, nobody wants to go against the grain by dropping red pills like Sacklioids, for fear of being ostracized or excluded. The university setup is thus a really, really bad setup for intellectual development. It must be tweaked.

While everyone longs for camaraderie, genuine friendship and some degree of scopic adulation, it is still generally the case that social structures are adverse to the pursuit of truth. Love of truth is rare, love of self, common. What’s more, with how hostile the political left has become to dissent and to speech, and with how dominant extreme-left thought is at elite universities, this all only serves to exacerbate the flawed university design. Human beings typically want what they want, they want to be told things that are favorable to their interests, that are soothing to their egos, etc.

The truth, on the other hand, is ugly, harsh and frequently inimical to our naive ideals, oversized egos, selfish interests and personal desires. Books are often the only true friends an intellectual ever possesses.

 

The noble pursuit of truth is more important for and more valuable to society than the petty, short-lived emotions of egotistical children and deluded ideologues too primitive to cope with or tolerate words. A solid grasp on reality is the true basis for both individual success and group flourishing. You can’t solve problems if you refuse to acknowledge them. Figuring out what the problems are and what they aren’t and what works and what doesn’t in solving them, all of these judgments depend upon the free and unfettered exchange of ideas, even “controversial” ones, even “hateful” ones. We understood that as a society once. Now we seem not to understand it. The left has labeled this development “progress”, but it is anything but progress. If anything it is both a symbol and a sign that Western civilization has slipped into a new Dark Age. Climbing out will not be easy, especially if reason itself is forbidden.

41 Comments

  • The generals,as we know prepare to the previous wars.The same with the white nationalists: they repeat the nazis of the desperate defeated Germany. As Hitler in Soviets` attacked Berlin,ve wrote of his declared Jew-hatred,his American followers today, among the Muslim terror and Islamisation of Europe, cry about The Joos+ bolshevik attack , haha.

  • It is a fact that the Judaic supremacy has put into operation a plan through its Gentile Masonry (masonic order is the social base of all republics) and its Muslim vassals to ethnically cleanse Europe.

    https://sovereignwales.com/2016/09/20/the-genocidal-kalergi-plan-to-destroy-the-indigenous-nations-and-peoples-of-europe/

    It is also a historical fact that the Judaic supremacy owns all Western nations through its reserve bank system – all central banks linking up to its BIS cartel.

    The ethnic cleansing of Europe and White re-placement in all Western nations is policy. It is being implemented as I write.

    DraintheSwamp, it is irrelevant whether White people think well or ill of ourselves. This policy is underway. What is your take on it?

  • So I am a little confused here. From what I understand from science is that all humans came from AFRICA. I read somewhere that blue eyes are a genetic deformity and that some of you people believe that Jews (The chosen people in the old testament) are somehow not white. ?? Do you believe Jesus was white? Can’t recall any white people coming from the middle east back in those days. In fact the more I research (hint,hint) instead of just believing what somebody tells me, I find that we as “White” people are direct descendants of Black Africans. Am I wrong? I also found that hitler destroyed an entire town to hide the evidence when he found out that he was dare I say part Jewish. Huh….
    And please start quoting that bible book you so cling to. Tell me something, Can you tell the story of your grandpa circa 1600 or so? Because that is what the people did 300 years AFTER Emmanuel (Jesus) died. They wrote the story of (One of ) the many people in Jesus’ time that swore he was the son of a mystical all mighty being. Lets do some research here sheeple. Don’t you want to know the truth? About anything?

    • 1) Nope, not true. Not all humans “come from Africa”. In fact a paper from Alan Templeton about 10 years back concluded with near certainty that all human DNA & lineages are not in fact from Africa, or recently from Africa. There are many surviving non-African lines & much surviving non-African DNA. There is even Neanderthal, Denisovan & other archaic hominid DNA within the human genome. So no, you’ve been lied to. However, yes, 100,000 years or so ago *most of our descendants* (non-Africans) left northern Africa. Of course this was 120,000 years or so after this line had split from blacks / sub-Saharan Africans. So blacks & whites have been more or less genetically separated for 200,000-250,000 years or so, with only some minimal gene flow between the groups.
      2) The Levant has always been white or whitish. Always. “Can’t recall any white people coming from the Middle East”? Umm, I don’t know what that even means. The Levant was in fact lighter prior to the Arab conquest, pal. If you want to know what native Levantines looked like, look to the Greek Orthodox or Maronite communities of the Levant (see Assad, an Alawite). The native people of the Near-East have always been fairly light-skinned.
      3) Hitler was not a Jew. His E1b1b was in all likelihood E-V13, a Y-DNA haplogroup essentially indigenous to Europe. Not a Jew. Basically silly Cultural Marxist propaganda.
      4) Blue eyes are not a genetic deformity. There is some debate as to what evolutionary purpose they serve. One is that the mutation piggy-backed on the mutation for lighter skin, which is to say they are a secondary effect of other, valuable genetic mutations. Light skin is valuable because it helps absorb sunlight that in turn helps in the production of vitamin D. The other possibility is that people just prefer lighter eye colors in their mates. Thus blue eyes may have been strongly selected for through sexual selection/preferences.

  • We white people think too highly of ourselves when we claim that non-whites want to eliminate us from the face of the earth, destroy our heritage, etc.. Behind the persecution complex expressed by this claim resides the perverse belief at the heart of alt-right identitarianism: we may be losing political and economic power, but the world still revolves around us white people! White identitarianism is solipsistic navel-gazing; it provides a false solution to the incredibly complex problem of organizing societies and creating cultures that attend to the material and spiritual needs of human beings who have to share a planet whether we like it or not. We have given up on learning how to begin addressing this problem, and we project our intellectual and moral weakness onto others. We depend for our identity on these projections. If we are suffering, it must be because we are victims. The communists, Jews, and blacks have it out for us. Our entire existence depends on the presence of imaginary enemies.

    • 1) This is an article primarily about censorship. When you censor people, yes, you wrong them. People who are wronged are indeed “victims” in some sense. And since we in the Alt-Right are the only people with the balls to defend white civilization, censoring us is indeed very harmful to whites downstream, who are in some attenuated sense themselves victimized thereby. Furthermore, can anybody at this point seriously contest the claim that white Westerners are a genuinely aggrieved people, ruled over by Cultural Marxist psychopaths who hate them? Whites are suffering. It’s not purely because we are “victims”, but yes, we are “victims” in a very real sense. That said, we do need to take responsibility for ceasing to be victims, for refusing to be victims any longer. That’s part of what the Alt-Right is all about.
      2) “White identitarianism is solipsistic navel-gazing”. Funny, racial identity seems to be celebrated in non-whites & they seem to take their racial identity very seriously. Non-whites take racial organization seriously, racial solidarity seriously & furthering their own racial interests seriously. But when whites do it, it’s a false solution to a complex problem? LOL. What a cuck. As we lose our lands, our power, our genes, our nations, we’re just supposed to lie down before those who are taking those things from us, often for explicitly racial reasons? We are being conquered. Why are you too much of a coward to stand up for yourself & your civilization? That is the real question you should be asking yourself.
      3) There is no “persecution complex” on display in this article. Whites are an aggrieved people. I wouldn’t call whites “oppressed” per se, but aggrieved? Definitely. As for the Alt-Right, we are very much a persecuted community. How could anybody dispute this? Employment discrimination, random violent assaults, social ostracism, censorship, even mistreatment at the hands of the state & the law! This is all part and parcel of being an Alt-Righter. This *is* persecution, by definition. If anything however, I think I downplay the level of persecution whites & Alt-Righters suffer from in this article.

      • “1) This is an article primarily about censorship. When you censor people, yes, you wrong them. People who are wronged are indeed “victims” in some sense. And since we in the Alt-Right are the only people with the balls to defend white civilization, censoring us is indeed very harmful to whites downstream, who are in some attenuated sense themselves victimized thereby. Furthermore, can anybody at this point seriously contest the claim that white Westerners are a genuinely aggrieved people, ruled over by Cultural Marxist psychopaths who hate them? Whites are suffering. It’s not purely because we are “victims”, but yes, we are “victims” in a very real sense. That said, we do need to take responsibility for ceasing to be victims, for refusing to be victims any longer. That’s part of what the Alt-Right is all about.”

        Seems like its about a lot more than censorship: “They want to remove our race from the Earth with as little fanfare as possible.” You admit as much in your response. You are “defending white civilization.” “White civilization” is under attack, you claim. First of all, what is “white civilization”? Sure, ancient Greece, maybe. Probably Rome and the history of Western Europe. But what is that history without nonwhites? There is no “civilized” Europe without European wealth, and there is no European wealth without colonialism of nonwhite peoples. And while you might want to claim that the fact that Europeans were capable of colonizing nonwhite peoples proves our superiority, I would simply respond,”Superiority in instruments of death does not entail racial superiority.”

        You claim that that is what the alt-right is all about, but all I see on this website are complaints about how “white genocide.” I agree that whites are suffering, and that we need to talk about white suffering, but I disagree with your diagnosis of the problem. You imagine that nonwhites are living large on the social and economic capital expropriated from the white race, and you would be mistaken. Whites are now beginning to suffer from issues that have plague nonwhite communities for generation. Whites are suffering just as people of all races suffer.

        “2) “White identitarianism is solipsistic navel-gazing”. Funny, racial identity seems to be celebrated in non-whites & they seem to take their racial identity very seriously. Non-whites take racial organization seriously, racial solidarity seriously & furthering their own racial interests seriously. But when whites do it, it’s a false solution to a complex problem? LOL. What a cuck. ”

        Why is that? Why do non-whites take their racial identity very seriously? Is it possible that they have done so out of necessity? When you are systematically hyper-exploited and oppressed on the basis of your skin color, actively affirming and re-constructing that skin color-identification can be a survival tactic. Non-whites, and Black Americans in particular, had no choice but to take their racial identity seriously because our European ancestors forced it upon them. If we want to “defend white civilization,” the way to do it is not to resent non-whites for taking up and creatively re-constructing the racial identity we imposed upon them, but to abandon our ethno-state and race war fantasies, recognize our history, and learn how to co-exist.

        “As we lose our lands, our power, our genes, our nations, we’re just supposed to lie down before those who are taking those things from us, often for explicitly racial reasons? We are being conquered. Why are you too much of a coward to stand up for yourself & your civilization? That is the real question you should be asking yourself.”

        More persecution complex. There is no Jewish plot to mobilize blacks and Muslims against white populations. There is a system of global capitalism in crisis, and that crisis – which, I should add, has been long felt by non-whites – is finally creeping up to the door step of white Americans.

        “Our genes?” Are you so sure that “white genes” are not already complex mixtures of diverse genomes? The notion of racial purity has no scientific basis.

        Also, “our land”? What makes this land “ours,” other than the fact that our ancestors gradually colonized the lands of the natives and exterminated them for it? Oh, I get it. You are afraid of karma. Perhaps you should be. Fortunately, no one wants to exterminate whites.

        “3) There is no “persecution complex” on display in this article. Whites are an aggrieved people. I wouldn’t call whites “oppressed” per se, but aggrieved? Definitely. As for the Alt-Right, we are very much a persecuted community. How could anybody dispute this? Employment discrimination, random violent assaults, social ostracism, censorship, even mistreatment at the hands of the state & the law! This is all part and parcel of being an Alt-Righter. This *is* persecution, by definition. If anything however, I think I downplay the level of persecution whites & Alt-Righters suffer from in this article.””

        Stop pretending Alt-Right resentment is shared by all whites. It is not. A small sub-section of the white American population feels resentful because they are beginning to suffer from problems that have plagued non-whites for generations, and they imagine that non-whites have been enjoying lavish, luxurious lives at their expense. Yes, some but not all whites are aggrieved.

        I don’t agree with Twitter’s strategy of banning Alt-Right accounts, by the way, so I can see how that might push some buttons. As for the other issues, what do you think non-whites have been experiencing for generations? Maybe this is a good opportunity for whites to reflect on our historical experience and recognize the fact that our ancestors did some horrible shit, and that the systems and institutions that they set in motion still disproportionately impact the lives of the poor and non-whites. Instead of getting all pissy, we should stop marching around with literal Nazis, think about the actual history of the United States, and learn from people of all races who are actually working to realize a more peaceful and authentic society for everyone.

        • One issue at a time, although there is so much nonsense in what you’ve written it will be quite tedious. I’ll try to keep it relatively brief.
          1) “It’s about a lot more than censorship”, then quoting me: “They want to genocide us with as little fanfare as possible”. Ugh yeah, that’s what their censorship is all about: maintaining their illegitimate hegemony over us & keeping resistance to their atrocities to a minimum. But again, this centers around censorship, because resistance to their crimes is at this point primarily via speech. Durr.
          2) The anti-white policies of the Cultural Marxist overclass are explicitly anti-white & they are meant to be anti-white. I never claimed non-whites are living large at our expense, although yes, a lot of non-white groups do benefit greatly from white ingenuity & wealth & could never produce the same qualify of life for themselves if left to their own devices.
          3) Most non-white groups have faced trivial to no persecution in America in the last hundred years. Arab immigrants do about as well as whites in terms of wealth & health outcomes. Jews do far better. So do East Asians. Yet all these groups have advocacy groups & are basically allowed to ethnically network & discriminate with impunity. Your argument is nonsense. Non-white groups organize racially because they know it is good for them. The same allowance is not permitted to whites because our anti-white overlords won’t permit it. Nothing to do with past discrimination or persecution at all. Total nonsense argument.
          4) When you have a public march, all kinds of people show up. It’s virtually impossible to control who does. Many of these “Nazis” who show up are Deep State & CIA plants. Some aren’t, but there is no real way to completely control who shows up at public marches & protests. No one wants actual Nazis there.
          5) “There is no white wealth without colonialism of non-European peoples”. Nonsense. Total nonsense. White ingenuity was always prodigious. Whites were pretty much always intellectually prolific. There is little correlation within Europe between successful colonial & non-colonial nations. IQ trends within Europe better explain European wealth patterns. Furthermore, slavery for example is not correlated with wealth anywhere. Nations that still practice it are generally poor. Nations that practiced it historically in very large quantities are poorer than those who practiced it moderately: Brazil/Haiti vs United States. This holds within the United States as well. The South is poorer than the North. Indeed, slavery arguably underdeveloped the South. White people do not need non-whites to be wealthy & never have. Italy, Germany, Czech Republic, Austria, Norway, Hungary, Greece & Sweden were not serious colonial powers, but alas they are all quite wealthy. This is very similar to Neo-Nazi reasoning with regard to Jewish wealth, namely that it is all only the result of Jewish ethnic networking, racism, exploitation of goy labor, etc. It’s basically nonsense. Extreme disproportionate Jewish wealth in the West is certainly in part a function of these phenomena, but Jews would be quite wealthy & successful regardless.
          6) White genes are “diverse”. Buying into the “white people don’t exist”, “race doesn’t exist” Marxist propaganda I see. Europe is actually quite undiverse genetically, for what it is worth. Europeans are all fairly genetically similar. There is no doubt differentiation, but we are a people, make no mistake. And then “what is white civilization?” LOL! More reductio ad absurdum I see. Is that you there, Noel Ignatiev? Really drinking the anti-white Kool-Aid of your Cultural Marxist overlords I see. White people exist. We will not be replaced. Sorry.

          • 1) What crimes and atrocities against whites are you talking about? Are you referring this comment you make above: “Employment discrimination, random violent assaults, social ostracism, censorship, even mistreatment at the hands of the state & the law!”?

            2) What specific policies are explicitly anti-white?

            Right, so you believe non-whites benefit from the supposed persecution of whites.

            3) If your claim is that there has been no discrimination against non-whites over the last one hundred years, then you are wrong. We can debate about “persecution,” but we would have to get clear on what we mean by it. You also seem to presume that non-whites only ever organize racially in order to pursue their own private interests, and ignore the many cases in which whites and non-whites organize together to pursue inter-racial interests. Not to mention non-white organizing to advocate for whites. Black Lives Matter calling attention to the Daniel Shaver killing comes to mind as a recent example. Black Lives Matter organizing to provide aid in Houston after Harvey is another.

            Also, the question for me is not WHETHER whites develop racial consciousness, but HOW. There are many ways to organize racially, and it is not clear that anti-semitism and racial supremacy is the best way to do that (again, as I mentioned above, it is quite clear to anyone after two minutes surfing altright.com and debate_altright that many on the alt-right are anti-semites and racial supremacists with respect to blacks and latinos. So don’t confuse anti-white supremacy with anti-white. The two are not the same.

            4) Bullshit. The Alt-Right has consistently organized with neo-Nazis and fascists. Indeed, many on the Alt-Right ARE neo-Nazis and fascists. You can try to polish your “optics” for the “normies,” but it’s hard to argue that such a consistent neo-Nazi presence is merely accidental.

            5) LOL. So the history of colonialism played no role in the development of European civilization? Those nations may not be serious colonial powers. The wonderful thing about colonialism, and you can refer to the case of the conquest of South America here, is that it does not only benefit the colonial nation. The massive influx of gold over generations into Europe benefited multiple nation.

            6) Nice try, but if you return to my comments, you will notice that I never even suggested that races or white people do not exist. I said that the notion of racial PURITY has no scientific basis. Pretty significant difference there.

          • 1) “What specific policies are anti-white?” LOL!!!
            Diversity is anti-white. It is the celebration, indeed the deification of the disappearance of white people. It is the state religion.
            -Forced integration
            -The mass-scale invasion of formerly overwhelmingly territories by Muhammadans & Africans
            -The erasure of our history
            -The denigration of white heroes of the past
            -The vilification of white racial consciousness by the press & power structure
            -The constant shaming of white people: white privilege propaganda, railing against white power, etc.
            -Ceaseless miscegenation propaganda
            -Conditioning whites to be ok with their eradication
            -The promotion and normalization of miscegenation (race-mixing) starting in the 60s. Now the outright glamorization of it & the pathologization of those who don’t.
            -The one-way orientation of civil rights laws. They basically only ever apply to whites.
            -The one-way orientation of Cultural Marxist critique of all racial gaps. Never once heard anyone say: the gap between Asians & blacks is X, or the gap between Jews & hispanics is X. These social critiques are implicit if not explicit attacks on white people.
            – “Hate speech” codes in many Western nations. Here we don’t have it because of the 1st Amendment, but rest assured we would if they could get away with it. They are meant to suppress white rage. They are selectively applied toward whites.
            -“Hate crime” laws which are also selectively applied against whites & meant to keep them vassalized.
            You see, the entire Cultural Marxist system is anti-white. Deeply anti-white. What we have in the Western World is a slow-moving genocidal system.
            2) The Alt-Right is big tent. No one is truly unwelcome at our events, if they love & are willing to advocate for their race. Anyone who supports the cause of advocacy of whites is, in some sense, welcome. But most of us find true Neo-Nazis off-putting. That said, we’re not going to denounce them or demonize them because their existence hurts your feelers. We’re not cucks. But in fact the Alt-Right has frequently & very explicitly told participating protesters at their events to keep their Swastikas & other symbols of Nazism at home, so really, you just don’t know what you’re talking about. At all.
            3) Your argument about why Arabs, Jews, East-Asians, Indians, etc. all have racial interest organizations is transparent nonsense. You’re clearly someone who doesn’t know how to concede defeat on a point. Whites don’t organize racially because the anti-white power system doesn’t let us. There is no other reason. Whites need organizations & leaders specifically protecting & advancing our interests far more than Jews do. No group has far more power in America than Jews to control the narrative, to influence democracy, etc. LOL.
            4) Yes, white people would be intellectually prolific, technologically advanced, & quite wealthy, colonialism or not.
            Of course there’s no way to know this, in part because these things are all in some sense interrelated. White daring compelled whites to seek out new lands, frontiers & territories. Superior white intellect meant superior military tactics & technology which helped us win war after war, etc. So these types of success generally go together & there is obviously no way to spin the clock back, but with all that said, yes, absolutely, whites would have been successful, colonialism or not.
            5) The rest of what you’ve written is sheer drivel. Cheerio.

      • On a final note, the problem is not THAT whites are becoming racially conscious; the problem is HOW we are becoming racially conscious. How do you expect people to respond when they see Alt-Right activists marching around with literal Nazis (not to mention the fact that a two-minute perusal of altright.com or Debate_Altright quickly reveals the rabid anti-semitism and national socialist tendencies on the alt right)?

        There are other ways to become conscious of whiteness. See, for example, Linda Alcoff’s The Future of Whiteness.

  • There is no honest speech without accountability. I know, I know. Here I am, trolling under a screen name, yet I know I’m still right. The members of your “movement” are doxxed, shamed, blacklisted, and fired for their genocidal bigotry. Those consequences are fair-and-square for terrors like you, who demand to dominate people with “speech”. You’d have no problem, if your “speech” sought to SHARE its influence with everyone else’s influence. But, the goal of your “speech” is horrified silence, especially from your targets. By inflicting that much harm and demanding that much attention, you’ve forfeited your right to “speak” in (Ha!) peace. This article is such a #deplorablesnowflake move – whining about the problems you’ve dumped on yourselves. Incredible!

    • 1) “There is no honest speech without accountability”.
      Honest speech has nothing to do with accountability. Nothing. “Accountability” is fundamentally hostile to free, honest speech. Why should a person be punished for speaking honestly? This is fundamentally totalitarian thinking. If people are being terrorized for free speech, you don’t have free speech, you don’t have democracy. Stop pretending our words are “terror”. This is nonsense. Words are just words. They are not comparable to being mob-assaulted, terminated, blacklisted, etc. Those are truly harmful actions, not mere ideas. “Dominating” people with speech? What does that even mean! LOL. Nonsensical silliness. You’re just losing the debate online. If we’re dominant it’s simply because we’re smarter than you.
      2) Stop justifying your primitive, 3rd World tendencies with pseudo-philosophical gobbledygook. It is your ilk that wants to silence & censor your political opponents & is in fact doing so. We’re not silencing anyone. “Horrified silence”? LOL. You cowards just don’t like being confronted with facts & truth. You can’t handle real debate because you’re overwhelmingly stupid people. Losing debates & being upset about it is not at all comparable to the true censorship social media sites are engaging in. In fact it’s not censorship at all, it’s just losing debates & being unwilling to accept it.
      3) You’re projecting. The only real genocidal bigotry is yours. The left’s entire worldview is essentially white-hatred intellectualized. Indeed, you & your allies within Western power structures, are actively genociding white people, flooding our lands with hostile invaders against our will, forcing integration upon us at gunpoint, shaming us if we don’t celebrate miscegenation and our own dispossession, etc. We in the Alt-Right are genociding no one. Must of us have never advocated for the genocide of anyone. You are beyond deluded.

        • See, Sprauger? Your own supporters can vouch for my comment! You’re the deluded one, if you think you will ever get a public forum for that sort of hate speech.

          • 1) You can’t spell. It’s spelt “Spraguer”, cucky.
            2) Nobody likes your comment. You are minus 2, genius. Bad eyesight?
            3) “Hate speech” is not a valid intellectual concept. Statistics on crime broken down by race are considered “hate speech”. “Hate speech” is just truth that ideologues (typically Marxist ideologues) don’t like. They have “hate speech” laws or like laws in every 3rd World hellhole. It’s a concept accepted only by primitives— pure nonsense, a way for totalitarians to consolidate power. Such rules serve no other purpose but to serve the powerful.

          • Yeah, just like “bigly” is “acceptable”. Technically, they’re both decent English. But, those words will still make you sound like a #MORON. #DownWithCheetoSpeak

          • Pronouncing & spelling the past tense of “spell” “spelt” is how the English do it, you know the people whose language it is? Yeah, you’re a stupid person.

          • 1) I’m not a Trump supporter.
            2) I don’t speak like Trump.
            3) I am using the language properly.
            4) Americans speak the English language. At least they are supposed to.
            5) You are a very, very, very stupid person.
            6) I’m a post-American anyway, pal. We want our own state. White. Ethnostate. Now.

          • If you were really smart, you wouldn’t want the impossible. That ethnostate is just like Cheeto’s “wall” – the lost cause of bigoted, White luddites.

          • Theodore Herzl had a dream. Now it is an Apartheidesque ethnostate.
            Martin Luther King Jr. had a dream. Now it is a Cultural Marxist, dystopian, 3rd World nightmare.
            If the dreams of these fools can come true, so can ours.
            You won’t be allowed in when you come running.
            The white ethnostate will come to fruition. Count on it.

      • “Jews will not replace us” and the like are NOT just words. Re-watch some of the post-Charlottesville news on YouTube. You’ve turned many lives into an absolute hell this year. Until you hear the words “You’re fired/deplatformmed/doxxed/etc.”, your evil slogans DO take over your victim’s lives.

        • Actually yes, those are just words. LOL. You’re not very bright are you?
          Also, I see absolutely no problem with white people telling Jews, especially powerful Jewish oligarchs who are trying to eradicate them, that they refuse to be replaced. Frankly, I think it was long overdue.

  • Jews in these organizations want to silence white nationalists for the same reason criminals want to intimidate or murder the victims of, or the witnesses to, their crimes.

  • Why should American policy be surprising?

    Monopoly Capitalism leads to Monopoly Intellectualism, esp if the monopolization of industries is controlled by a single ethnic group.

    In the end, free speech is secondary to Power Speech. Even if every American has equal speech rights as an individual, most voices go unheard. If, out of1000 people, everyone has the same right to speech but only one person has control of the megaphone, only one voice has Power Speech that is heard over all other speeches.

    Not only is there corporate monopoly of media in the US but there is a ethno-monopoly of the media. If the US minded its own business, it wouldn’t matter so much.

    The Mass Media had long been monopolized. The internet allowed some degree of alternative voices, but Platform Monopoly by Google, Facebook, and Twitter means entire voices will soon be shut down or shadowbanned. Also, financial services like Paypal deny service to men like Jared Taylor who never committed a crime while criminal thugs of BLM and Antifa are protected. Or, the Media stir up ‘Russia Hysteria’ to spread fear that alternative voices and news are all controlled by Putin as New Hitler.

    Some say this is ‘leftist’ or ‘cultural marxist’, but isn’t it odd that Monopoly Intellectualism also targets BDS, trying to criminalize it nation-wide? BDS has long been associated with the Left, but even Democratic Party bigshots side with Sheldon Adelson and Neocons when it comes to Palestinian rights.

    The dogma of PC and cult of Homomania also further Monopoly Intellectualism because so many scholars and media people were raised from cradle with the notion of Holy Homo. It’s their religion.

    • There is indeed a kosher-oligarch bent to censorship & blacklisting in the Western World. That said, marginal discrimination against the BDS movement & the radical left (Antifa) is simply not comparable to what is being done to right-wingers & the Alt-Right. It’s just not comparable. We have no defenders in the power structure, they have many. We have been systematically deplatformed & exiled from large portions of the internet. The BDS movement isn’t even relevant enough to get that kind of pushback. But at the end of the day, they have plenty of support & backing within the non-white/anti-white power structure to at least keep their movement rolling/breathing. They’re advocating for poor, oppressed POC after all. It’s not like they’re advocating for evil, oppressive, soon-to-be-extinct white folk or something!

  • This was a good article.

    Remember folks, the truth doesn’t care about anybodies feelings, nor does it require anybodies approval. If the things your saying aren’t pissing off the normies, then you probably aren’t saying anything of value.

  • ADL and SPLC that are propped up by rich capitalist Zionists are ‘communist’? Really?

    You seem to be self-censoring yourself. ADL is totally tribalist and supremacist when it comes to Jewish identity and power. There is no real leftism in the West. Rather, Jews manipulate PC and bogus leftism to suppress gentile nationalism to favor Jewish Supremacism.

    • 1) That people have money doesn’t make them “capitalist”. The Bolsheviks running the USSR were also rich. Indeed, they were rich in the same way that Zionist bankers are rich, namely through government force, theft and what would more aptly be described as a semi-feudalist system. Our elites are not capitalists, they are thieves. Market forces are for the serfs. This is how Marxist systems really work. All the harsh social and economic rules and restrictions are for the common people, never the elites. The plutocrats/feudalists at the top hoard all the money & resources, but there is money, make no mistake about, communist doctrine notwithstanding.
      2) “The ADL is tribalist & judeo-supremacist”… yeah, but so is Communism, no? The roots of Marxist thought are almost inseparable from Jewish ethno-supremacy. Communism everywhere isn’t strictly Jewish or administered by Jews, but there is something fundamentally Jewish about it and its roots. The SPLC is pure Cultural Marxist ideologically. Pure. Cultural Marxism is not “Communism” strictly speaking, but it’s damned close.
      3) “There is no real leftism in the West”. There is no real rightism either! Although I would say there is no real liberalism in the West, but plenty of leftism. Indeed, what you see around you is leftism in practice and effect. The current sorry state of the Western World is what extreme-leftism pretty much always devolves into.

      • Good comment. I do think we should be clear that, although capitalism is not our enemy, and in fact has many benefits, it is ultimately just a way for free men to exchange goods and provide for their families, freely. It must always be subordinated to something higher.

        • Exactly so. Any system must have a higher purpose than itself. People tend to forget that when the profits start obscuring their view of reality.

Leave a Reply