Perspective

The Descent Of Western Man

Twitter has done wonders for free speech and open, unfettered debate in its short lifespan. Democracy thrives when people feel free to express themselves, when minds are exposed to new and different ideas. If you can’t even discuss the merits of certain ideas and certain policies, true democratic choice doesn’t exist. In recent years, however, Twitter and many other social media entities, run by vile white-haters and vicious Neo-Bolsheviks, are unhappy with the political results their good deeds and market ingenuity have engendered.

The ADL, the SPLC, and other hate groups are doing their best to squash and/or criminalize dissent and are using censorship to advance their sick leftist agenda, much like they always have. The internet is their new battleground. The internet has exposed these criminal, effectively communist organizations for what they really are and they aren’t happy about it at all. They haven’t been able to exercise the same control over the internet and internet speech that they have historically been able to exercise over the Mainstream Media. So they are now conspiring with and at times strong-arming social media sites into curtailing speech, in a despicable attempt to close up the previously free internet and manipulate democratic outcomes. These are very sick people.

What the SPLC really believes.

Generally speaking, a person does not need to know the source of ideas/claims to analyze or evaluate those ideas/claims. The free flow of information is fantastic for mental plasticity and intellectual growth. Our Cultural Marxist overlords are irate that armies of trolls are at the ready 24 hours a day to expose their lies, hypocrisy and moral inconsistencies, which they peddle to the masses as gospel. One strategem now being floated, in another disgusting attempt to undermine free expression and the free exchange of ideas on the web, is to eliminate anonymity on social media sites.

The reason for this is simple. The Cultural Marxist totalitarians who spend all their free time trying to silence white people who don’t want to genocide themselves, by doxing them, shaming them, getting them fired from their jobs and otherwise enforcing the inherently totalitarian apparatus of thought-crime codes in formerly free, white nations, are very unhappy about not being able to terrorize random internet bloggers and commenters, expose them to physical assault, and frankly ruin their lives over words and thoughts, given that their true identities are unknown. Imagine all the harassment, violence, discrimination, and censorship they could engage in if they just knew who we were!

The world would be a much better place if their hate was the only hate around, since their hate doesn’t count as hate to the anti-white psychopaths in power who agree with them.

These liars argue that this measure will enhance what they call “civility” in the arena of internet dialogue and debate. But they don’t care about “civility”. What they really want is to silence their political opponents under the pretext of enhancing civility. They say they are combating “hate speech”, but it is funny how no matter what blacks, Jews and 3rd Worlders say about whites it is never “hate speech”, and no matter what whites say about non-whites, no matter how mild, no matter how measured, no matter how steeped in raw data or facts, it is always “hate speech”. They don’t want civility. They want us to be silent and helpless as they commit their heinous atrocities against our people.

They want to remove our race from the Earth with as little fanfare as possible.

“Hate speech” is not a valid intellectual concept and never has been. Every criminal regime and every tyrant lording over every miserable, poverty-stricken, underdeveloped (and now miserable, rich, overdeveloped) backwater, populated by worthless primitives and voiceless serfs, justifies the censorship of their political opponents. It is nothing new and it is nothing noble. It is primitive, pathetic, evil. It is a crime against humanity and the real butcher of democracy in most formerly democratic Western nations, such as the UK, Germany, Sweden, et al.

Twitter is foolish in every sense to go along with it, not just from a business standpoint, but from a moral one. It is patently indefensible, and the folly of it is easy to expose if only the censors would let us do so!

 

More anonymity means fewer social repercussions for speech, and so leads to more speech. A lack of speech is the real threat to American democracy, not Russia or Trump or anything of the sort! Speech is fantastic for democracy! It is not fantastic for parasitic oligarchs and would-be tyrants, but for democracy it is fantastic. Twitter blossomed into a haven for free thought and open debate in part due to internet anonymity. It has been almost magical for Western democracies and for the genesis of bona fide choice in selecting Western leaders and in deciding our own fate as sovereign peoples. Indeed, there is even some evidence to suggest that the Flynn Effect is in part a byproduct of exposure to an abundance of data and common logical structures and patterns. In other words, our exposure to new ideas and new concepts may literally boost our IQ’s.

Yet we want to limit our access to only those ideas and concepts that are power-structure approved? This is the height of absurdity.

People are always complaining about how university campuses have devolved into echo chambers for leftist hacks and Marxist nutjobs pining for safe-spaces, and inquiry-free and speech-free zones of left-wing propaganda, where only one narrow narrative is tolerated. The stories coming out of university campuses daily of how intellectual dissidents are being treated there are downright disturbing, almost Sovietesque. What has come of Western academia is downright shameful. Yet I have come across very few actual proposals meant to address these systemic shortcomings and to remedy the current sorry state of Western academia. The reality is, nobody will speak up, nobody will think for themselves, if it means getting expelled or becoming a total outcast for wrong-think.

Universities would do well to incorporate some degree of anonymity into their classrooms and overall academic structure/design. The social and political pressures that are so often hostile to free speech and free inquiry are particularly acute in the highly social, often tightly-knit university setting. When everybody knows everybody and everybody longs for social acceptance, nobody wants to go against the grain by dropping red pills like Sacklioids, for fear of being ostracized or excluded. The university setup is thus a really, really bad setup for intellectual development. It must be tweaked.

While everyone longs for camaraderie, genuine friendship and some degree of scopic adulation, it is still generally the case that social structures are adverse to the pursuit of truth. Love of truth is rare, love of self, common. What’s more, with how hostile the political left has become to dissent and to speech, and with how dominant extreme-left thought is at elite universities, this all only serves to exacerbate the flawed university design. Human beings typically want what they want, they want to be told things that are favorable to their interests, that are soothing to their egos, etc.

The truth, on the other hand, is ugly, harsh and frequently inimical to our naive ideals, oversized egos, selfish interests and personal desires. Books are often the only true friends an intellectual ever possesses.

 

The noble pursuit of truth is more important for and more valuable to society than the petty, short-lived emotions of egotistical children and deluded ideologues too primitive to cope with or tolerate words. A solid grasp on reality is the true basis for both individual success and group flourishing. You can’t solve problems if you refuse to acknowledge them. Figuring out what the problems are and what they aren’t and what works and what doesn’t in solving them, all of these judgments depend upon the free and unfettered exchange of ideas, even “controversial” ones, even “hateful” ones. We understood that as a society once. Now we seem not to understand it. The left has labeled this development “progress”, but it is anything but progress. If anything it is both a symbol and a sign that Western civilization has slipped into a new Dark Age. Climbing out will not be easy, especially if reason itself is forbidden.

Leave a Reply

41 Comments on "The Descent Of Western Man"

Notify of
avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
PermReader
Guest

The generals,as we know prepare to the previous wars.The same with the white nationalists: they repeat the nazis of the desperate defeated Germany. As Hitler in Soviets` attacked Berlin,ve wrote of his declared Jew-hatred,his American followers today, among the Muslim terror and Islamisation of Europe, cry about The Joos+ bolshevik attack , haha.

Lynda
Guest
It is a fact that the Judaic supremacy has put into operation a plan through its Gentile Masonry (masonic order is the social base of all republics) and its Muslim vassals to ethnically cleanse Europe. https://sovereignwales.com/2016/09/20/the-genocidal-kalergi-plan-to-destroy-the-indigenous-nations-and-peoples-of-europe/ It is also a historical fact that the Judaic supremacy owns all Western nations through its reserve bank system – all central banks linking up to its BIS cartel. The ethnic cleansing of Europe and White re-placement in all Western nations is policy. It is being implemented as I write. DraintheSwamp, it is irrelevant whether White people think well or ill of ourselves. This… Read more »
Dan
Guest
So I am a little confused here. From what I understand from science is that all humans came from AFRICA. I read somewhere that blue eyes are a genetic deformity and that some of you people believe that Jews (The chosen people in the old testament) are somehow not white. ?? Do you believe Jesus was white? Can’t recall any white people coming from the middle east back in those days. In fact the more I research (hint,hint) instead of just believing what somebody tells me, I find that we as “White” people are direct descendants of Black Africans. Am… Read more »
Spraguer
Guest
1) Nope, not true. Not all humans “come from Africa”. In fact a paper from Alan Templeton about 10 years back concluded with near certainty that all human DNA & lineages are not in fact from Africa, or recently from Africa. There are many surviving non-African lines & much surviving non-African DNA. There is even Neanderthal, Denisovan & other archaic hominid DNA within the human genome. So no, you’ve been lied to. However, yes, 100,000 years or so ago *most of our descendants* (non-Africans) left northern Africa. Of course this was 120,000 years or so after this line had split… Read more »
draintheswamp
Guest
We white people think too highly of ourselves when we claim that non-whites want to eliminate us from the face of the earth, destroy our heritage, etc.. Behind the persecution complex expressed by this claim resides the perverse belief at the heart of alt-right identitarianism: we may be losing political and economic power, but the world still revolves around us white people! White identitarianism is solipsistic navel-gazing; it provides a false solution to the incredibly complex problem of organizing societies and creating cultures that attend to the material and spiritual needs of human beings who have to share a planet… Read more »
Spraguer
Guest
1) This is an article primarily about censorship. When you censor people, yes, you wrong them. People who are wronged are indeed “victims” in some sense. And since we in the Alt-Right are the only people with the balls to defend white civilization, censoring us is indeed very harmful to whites downstream, who are in some attenuated sense themselves victimized thereby. Furthermore, can anybody at this point seriously contest the claim that white Westerners are a genuinely aggrieved people, ruled over by Cultural Marxist psychopaths who hate them? Whites are suffering. It’s not purely because we are “victims”, but yes,… Read more »
draintheswamp
Guest

On a final note, the problem is not THAT whites are becoming racially conscious; the problem is HOW we are becoming racially conscious. How do you expect people to respond when they see Alt-Right activists marching around with literal Nazis (not to mention the fact that a two-minute perusal of altright.com or Debate_Altright quickly reveals the rabid anti-semitism and national socialist tendencies on the alt right)?

There are other ways to become conscious of whiteness. See, for example, Linda Alcoff’s The Future of Whiteness.

draintheswamp
Guest
“1) This is an article primarily about censorship. When you censor people, yes, you wrong them. People who are wronged are indeed “victims” in some sense. And since we in the Alt-Right are the only people with the balls to defend white civilization, censoring us is indeed very harmful to whites downstream, who are in some attenuated sense themselves victimized thereby. Furthermore, can anybody at this point seriously contest the claim that white Westerners are a genuinely aggrieved people, ruled over by Cultural Marxist psychopaths who hate them? Whites are suffering. It’s not purely because we are “victims”, but yes,… Read more »
Spraguer
Guest
One issue at a time, although there is so much nonsense in what you’ve written it will be quite tedious. I’ll try to keep it relatively brief. 1) “It’s about a lot more than censorship”, then quoting me: “They want to genocide us with as little fanfare as possible”. Ugh yeah, that’s what their censorship is all about: maintaining their illegitimate hegemony over us & keeping resistance to their atrocities to a minimum. But again, this centers around censorship, because resistance to their crimes is at this point primarily via speech. Durr. 2) The anti-white policies of the Cultural Marxist… Read more »
draintheswamp
Guest
1) What crimes and atrocities against whites are you talking about? Are you referring this comment you make above: “Employment discrimination, random violent assaults, social ostracism, censorship, even mistreatment at the hands of the state & the law!”? 2) What specific policies are explicitly anti-white? Right, so you believe non-whites benefit from the supposed persecution of whites. 3) If your claim is that there has been no discrimination against non-whites over the last one hundred years, then you are wrong. We can debate about “persecution,” but we would have to get clear on what we mean by it. You also… Read more »
Spraguer
Guest
1) “What specific policies are anti-white?” LOL!!! Diversity is anti-white. It is the celebration, indeed the deification of the disappearance of white people. It is the state religion. -Forced integration -The mass-scale invasion of formerly overwhelmingly territories by Muhammadans & Africans -The erasure of our history -The denigration of white heroes of the past -The vilification of white racial consciousness by the press & power structure -The constant shaming of white people: white privilege propaganda, railing against white power, etc. -Ceaseless miscegenation propaganda -Conditioning whites to be ok with their eradication -The promotion and normalization of miscegenation (race-mixing) starting in… Read more »
site665
Guest
There is no honest speech without accountability. I know, I know. Here I am, trolling under a screen name, yet I know I’m still right. The members of your “movement” are doxxed, shamed, blacklisted, and fired for their genocidal bigotry. Those consequences are fair-and-square for terrors like you, who demand to dominate people with “speech”. You’d have no problem, if your “speech” sought to SHARE its influence with everyone else’s influence. But, the goal of your “speech” is horrified silence, especially from your targets. By inflicting that much harm and demanding that much attention, you’ve forfeited your right to “speak”… Read more »
Spraguer
Guest
1) “There is no honest speech without accountability”. Honest speech has nothing to do with accountability. Nothing. “Accountability” is fundamentally hostile to free, honest speech. Why should a person be punished for speaking honestly? This is fundamentally totalitarian thinking. If people are being terrorized for free speech, you don’t have free speech, you don’t have democracy. Stop pretending our words are “terror”. This is nonsense. Words are just words. They are not comparable to being mob-assaulted, terminated, blacklisted, etc. Those are truly harmful actions, not mere ideas. “Dominating” people with speech? What does that even mean! LOL. Nonsensical silliness. You’re… Read more »
site665
Guest

“Jews will not replace us” and the like are NOT just words. Re-watch some of the post-Charlottesville news on YouTube. You’ve turned many lives into an absolute hell this year. Until you hear the words “You’re fired/deplatformmed/doxxed/etc.”, your evil slogans DO take over your victim’s lives.

Barnabas Wagner
Guest

Jew

Spraguer
Guest

Actually yes, those are just words. LOL. You’re not very bright are you?
Also, I see absolutely no problem with white people telling Jews, especially powerful Jewish oligarchs who are trying to eradicate them, that they refuse to be replaced. Frankly, I think it was long overdue.

maxsnafu
Guest

“Must of us have never advocated for the genocide of anyone” but that could change.

site665
Guest

See, Sprauger? Your own supporters can vouch for my comment! You’re the deluded one, if you think you will ever get a public forum for that sort of hate speech.

Spraguer
Guest

1) You can’t spell. It’s spelt “Spraguer”, cucky.
2) Nobody likes your comment. You are minus 2, genius. Bad eyesight?
3) “Hate speech” is not a valid intellectual concept. Statistics on crime broken down by race are considered “hate speech”. “Hate speech” is just truth that ideologues (typically Marxist ideologues) don’t like. They have “hate speech” laws or like laws in every 3rd World hellhole. It’s a concept accepted only by primitives— pure nonsense, a way for totalitarians to consolidate power. Such rules serve no other purpose but to serve the powerful.

site665
Guest

“Spelt”? Hahaha! Neither can you, and you misspelled an actual word! I just typoed your name! LOL!

Spraguer
Guest

“Spelt” is an acceptable, variant spelling of the past tense of spell, you nitwit.

site665
Guest

Yeah, just like “bigly” is “acceptable”. Technically, they’re both decent English. But, those words will still make you sound like a #MORON. #DownWithCheetoSpeak

Spraguer
Guest

Pronouncing & spelling the past tense of “spell” “spelt” is how the English do it, you know the people whose language it is? Yeah, you’re a stupid person.

Johnny+Futurismo
Guest

He thinks “American” is a language… nuff said.

site665
Guest

I never said that, Johnny. I said Spraguer “replaces” ENGLISH with #CheetoSpeak . Not “American”, you #deplorable.

Spraguer
Guest

1) I’m not a Trump supporter.
2) I don’t speak like Trump.
3) I am using the language properly.
4) Americans speak the English language. At least they are supposed to.
5) You are a very, very, very stupid person.
6) I’m a post-American anyway, pal. We want our own state. White. Ethnostate. Now.

site665
Guest

If you were really smart, you wouldn’t want the impossible. That ethnostate is just like Cheeto’s “wall” – the lost cause of bigoted, White luddites.

Spraguer
Guest

Theodore Herzl had a dream. Now it is an Apartheidesque ethnostate.
Martin Luther King Jr. had a dream. Now it is a Cultural Marxist, dystopian, 3rd World nightmare.
If the dreams of these fools can come true, so can ours.
You won’t be allowed in when you come running.
The white ethnostate will come to fruition. Count on it.

MBNM+IX
Guest

The term is overused by everything really is orwellian.

DTTJ
Guest

http://www.returnofkings.com/143078/how-the-elite-manipulates-your-notions-of-love-and-hatred

Related article from ROK about the manipulation of words and their meanings and intentions.

“Truth is hate to those who hate the truth.”

Albionic+American
Guest

Jews in these organizations want to silence white nationalists for the same reason criminals want to intimidate or murder the victims of, or the witnesses to, their crimes.

Gubbler+Chechenova
Guest
Why should American policy be surprising? Monopoly Capitalism leads to Monopoly Intellectualism, esp if the monopolization of industries is controlled by a single ethnic group. In the end, free speech is secondary to Power Speech. Even if every American has equal speech rights as an individual, most voices go unheard. If, out of1000 people, everyone has the same right to speech but only one person has control of the megaphone, only one voice has Power Speech that is heard over all other speeches. Not only is there corporate monopoly of media in the US but there is a ethno-monopoly of… Read more »
Spraguer
Guest
There is indeed a kosher-oligarch bent to censorship & blacklisting in the Western World. That said, marginal discrimination against the BDS movement & the radical left (Antifa) is simply not comparable to what is being done to right-wingers & the Alt-Right. It’s just not comparable. We have no defenders in the power structure, they have many. We have been systematically deplatformed & exiled from large portions of the internet. The BDS movement isn’t even relevant enough to get that kind of pushback. But at the end of the day, they have plenty of support & backing within the non-white/anti-white power… Read more »
Johnny+Futurismo
Guest

This was a good article.

Remember folks, the truth doesn’t care about anybodies feelings, nor does it require anybodies approval. If the things your saying aren’t pissing off the normies, then you probably aren’t saying anything of value.

draintheswamp
Guest

So your criterion of truth is that it pisses people off? Wow. This sounds like internet troll culture elevated to the level of a global epistemology.

Johnny+Futurismo
Guest

comment image

Flaxen-headed Strumpet
Guest
Flaxen-headed Strumpet

Ironic that such an up front and succinct proverb would have Japanese (or even East Asian for that matter) origins. From some limited experience in dealing with Asians, friends’ accounts of same and layperson readings about the culture of consensus and the very round about way these people handle communications in situations of dissent within their leadership ranks, such a proverb is remarkable.

Gubbler+Chechenova
Guest

ADL and SPLC that are propped up by rich capitalist Zionists are ‘communist’? Really?

You seem to be self-censoring yourself. ADL is totally tribalist and supremacist when it comes to Jewish identity and power. There is no real leftism in the West. Rather, Jews manipulate PC and bogus leftism to suppress gentile nationalism to favor Jewish Supremacism.

Spraguer
Guest
1) That people have money doesn’t make them “capitalist”. The Bolsheviks running the USSR were also rich. Indeed, they were rich in the same way that Zionist bankers are rich, namely through government force, theft and what would more aptly be described as a semi-feudalist system. Our elites are not capitalists, they are thieves. Market forces are for the serfs. This is how Marxist systems really work. All the harsh social and economic rules and restrictions are for the common people, never the elites. The plutocrats/feudalists at the top hoard all the money & resources, but there is money, make… Read more »
Barnabas Wagner
Guest

Good comment. I do think we should be clear that, although capitalism is not our enemy, and in fact has many benefits, it is ultimately just a way for free men to exchange goods and provide for their families, freely. It must always be subordinated to something higher.

Rexterminatus
Plus Member

Exactly so. Any system must have a higher purpose than itself. People tend to forget that when the profits start obscuring their view of reality.