Gay Triumphalism Hits Its Stride In Australia
Submitted by Henry Armitage
In case you weren’t aware, (((scientists))) say that,”Gay and lesbian couples have happier relationships than their straight counterparts, according to new research.”
Yes, you heard that right.
Now, from the University of Queensland, Australia, and the same school of Frankenfurter social science, comes the news that homos are actually happier and more well-adjusted than normal people.
Academics behind the research say it counters the stereotype that same-sex relationships are conflictual, unhappy and dysfunctional.
The research, based on surveys of over 25,000 people in the UK and Australia, is published in the academic journal Family Relations.
It found that UK gay and lesbian couples had a relationship quality as high as their straight counterparts, while in Australia it was higher than heterosexuals.
Its authors have offered possible explanations for why homosexual relationships are happier. They said same-sex couples and particularly women are more likely to share domestic labour equally and this means there is less conflict.
Gay and lesbian people are also more likely to feel part of a community, and this could enhance their self-esteem and allow them to experience higher levels of wellbeing.
They could also be more invested in their relationships given the personal and institutional barriers that they have to overcome as members of a sexual minority.
Now, what are the odds they will spin this as showing that heterosexuals (or rather, heterosexual men) are discriminated against in a gynocentric, homo-normative culture?
You can bet if the results had gone the other way, “hetero-normative oppression” would have been the narrative.
Then they talk about the positive mental health outcomes associated with “feel[ing] part of a community,” which of course is something that is stigmatized among the white majorities of UK and Australia. Being a sex pervert and/or joining Antifa are probably the only two remaining ways white people are still allowed to identify with something bigger than themselves.
And, of course, they speculate that “shar[ing] domestic labor equally” leads to better relationships. Undermining traditional gender roles has obviously led to much more stable marriages over the past half a century.
So what were the odds that the authors could even consider saying that their results point to the breakdown of the traditional family due to feminism and the strain of trying to build a family life in a jewed-out, anti-traditional society that makes even something as basic as home-ownership impossible for increasing numbers? See, Gays will never know what it’s like to build your house on the sand of no-fault divorce laws and female hypergamy.
Will they bring up the correlation between premarital sex and the likelihood of divorce?
Will they talk about the strains placed on relationships by a woman having had dozens of fuck-buddy “partners” before settling down at age 40 with a beta male who disgusts her and can’t give her children?
Will these gay bug-persons of the J-left address the confounding issue of economic inequality represented by the fact that homos are an economically privileged sector of the population?
How about the fact that the study uses data from a pair of surveys that people can choose to complete or not, depending, presumably, on whether they have an ax to grind about social issues such as gay marriage, abortion, etc.?
After all, you’re talking about a couple percent of the population that is highly organized and works for its own group benefit to try to convince normies that, it’s all good, and they should totally have access to little kids. Might as well survey Jews on their “greed levels” and present the findings as proving that they are less greedy than the general population.
No, the deviancy activists who authored this study don’t address any of these concerns.
Nor do they address the fact that in Australia and throughout the world there are loads of statistics showing that LGBTQIPs are more likely to off themselves and generally have mental problems that would put strain on any relationship that went further than the odd shared meal and “stimulating conversation” in between poz parties.
In short, comparing the self-reported happiness scores of hetero couples and monogamous homos is like comparing apples with hemorrhoids.
The point of bringing up this study is not to shed light on its non-existent scientific rigor.
The scientists themselves know its a load of bull!
No, they did it to make the news and create a rainbow-colored buzz in the back of people’s minds. It’s done in the knowledge that most people won’t be bothered reading the actual paper to see how flimsy its claims are—while anyone who does is 99% guaranteed to be a gay activist or an academic too scared of losing his career to point out that this is junk science designed to support a prefabricated conclusion.
So naturally, that role falls to the Alt-Right.
My advice to the study’s authors would be to keep forging on. You’ve got the normies on the ropes now; time to finish us off. Go ahead and do one on how victims of childhood sexual abuse by other homes turn out to be happier than non-victims.
At this point, you probably could start convincing the general public that the world was flat (and cis-gendered) and nobody would blink an eye.