News

Macron Calls Out Burkina Faso’s Leader for Rise of Slavery, Incompetence

Europe is in a fun place now.

We have European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker struggling with nightmares about sad third-world migrants not being allowed to flood Europe; then there’s Angela Merkel beset by long and tedious discussions with German party leaders in hopes of forming a coalition government. Britain meanwhile has returned to its favorite hobby of getting triggered by Donald Trump’s Twitter activity and trying to find a legal way to ban him from the UK. In the midst of this, French President Emmanuel Macron maintains his own fair piece of the media’s attention with some newsworthy adventures from his trip in Africa.

Macron is currently on a tour of four African nations, trying to initiate a lasting solution to the slave trade that has sprung up in Libya as a result of masses of migrants getting stuck due to heightened Libyan security measures cutting back on human smuggling activity in the Mediterranean. As a result, Italy for example has seen a 67% decrease in migrant arrivals since July.

On November 28th, Macron surprised the world when he appeared to lose his temper during a speech at Ouagadougou University in Burkina Faso, a former French colony that gained independence in 1960. Admitting that European colonization had committed indisputable crimes in Africa, he then added that today, however, France’s paternalistic approach to African nations had to end.

According to RT:

The tradition of African nations reproaching France in case if something goes wrong should also be broken, he said, adding that the students spoke to him “as if he were a president of Burkina Faso” when complaining about the poor state of the university.

 

“Sometimes you talk to me like I’m still a colonial power,” the French president said. “But I do not want to deal with electricity in universities in Burkina Faso,” Macron added, smiling. Apparently warmed up by a mix of laughter, applause and whistling in the audience, he carried on. “It is the work of the president [of Burkina Faso],” he said, pointing at president Roch Marc Christian Kabore, who was listening to Macron’s speech from the same stage.

 

At this point, Kabore suddenly stood up and left the room. “He’s leaving… Stay there! So, he went to repair the air conditioning,” Macron shouted after the African state leader.

Beautiful. A prime illustration that demonstrates the essential problem with African-European relations. To top it off, during Macron’s visit in Burkina Faso, gangs of protesters flocked to the streets, burning tires while carrying signs that read “Down with imperialism!” and “French troops – out of Burkina Faso, out of Africa.” The convoys of France’s delegates were pelted with stones, and riot police had to intervene by spraying tear gas on the unruly mobs.

Believe me, there is nothing more that European citizens would like than to leave Africa alone. How wonderful the world would be if Africans could live without constant military and financial aid from the West. No more white supremacy, no more cultural appropriation. The problem is African nations have an unpleasant habit of devolving into total disease-infested dens of chaos if left to their own doings. On the one hand, Africans despise Europeans for historically colonizing them and innovating upon their rich natural resources, and on the other hand they desperately crave the level of civilization under which Western nations peacefully live and govern. They want that which is not in their capacity to create. They want the shiny things, they want the gibs. Africa will always either succumb to being ruled by a higher civilization (think China) or seek to destroy a higher civilization out of eventual resentment.

Aside from insulting Burkina Faso’s leader, Emmanuel Macron also had a few choice words about who’s really responsible for the Libyan slave trade.

“Who are the traffickers? Ask yourselves – being the African youth – that question. You are unbelievable. Who are the traffickers? They are Africans, my friends. They are Africans. Ask yourselves the question. It’s not the French who are the traffickers, it’s the Africans. So everyone should understand the responsibility, and we’ve started to do that, to dismantle them. But stop the argument saying, ‘It’s someone else.’

 

“Show me a French, Belgian, German person, who carried out trafficking between Nigeria and Libya. This person doesn’t exist. So, these days in Africa, there are Africans who make other Africans slaves, this is the reality. And there are Europeans who benefit from this misery in Europe, it’s unacceptable. In both cases, these are crimes. We are fighting both cases.”

Macron’s words are refreshing to hear in a time when the United Nations and other pro-invader organizations are heaping the blame for modern day African slavery upon native Europeans. UN Human Rights Chief, Zeid Ra’ad al-Hussein summed up the liberal mindset quite accurately in a statement he issued on November 14th: “The European Union’s policy of assisting the Libyan coastguard to intercept and return migrants in the Mediterranean [is] inhuman.”

These words come despite the EU shilling out over $150 million into Libya’s border patrol and aid for migrant camps. It is clear that helping migrants in their home countries is not the answer the globalists want. The only allowed option is the establishment of a permanent relocation scheme that will effectively erase the term illegal migration, and just make it migration. That’s the end goal that awaits the native citizens of Europe. Uneducated aggressive hordes flowing into Europe, bleeding her dry, forever.

As Macron’s visit to Burkina Faso proves, Africans crave decolonization and yet also beg Europeans for help whenever there’s something wrong in their nations. Migrants will throw stones at whites and rape their women, but will risk their lives to pay human smugglers to send them off on boats into the Mediterranean. They see nothing illogical with this. It goes beyond their base desire for immediate gratification.

African nations send their citizens to Europe, then refuse to accept them back unless Europe capitulates to their blackmail with big sacks of money. In this case, the EU is working on a program worth $9.5 billion to curb African and Middle Eastern immigration, while also paying for vocational training, job creation, and “renewable energy, financing of small and medium-sized businesses and agriculture.”

Will this satisfy the needs of Africans and spur them on to finally, after thousands of years of mud hut existence, create a sustainable civilization for themselves that doesn’t involve mutilating each other’s genitals? Of course not. As long as we play this game with the destructive greed of third world, we are only risking our own hard-earned right to live in peace.

Melissa Meszaros
Melissa is a Hungarian-American writer, editor, and translator who spent the first half of her life in Central New Jersey before relocating to Hungary. Today, from Hungary, she pursues a career in thought crime and Youtubing, and with her significant other is working towards building a loving home full of children and cats.

19 Comments

  • It would be in Africa’s best interest to stop the human trafficking and to work on lowering the birthrate. If you think Western Europe will be able to maintain that comfortable standard of living with millions of third worlders living in it, you’re living in a dream world. Because when Western Europe goes Africa will finally reach it’s carrying capacity and it will be something horrifying beautiful to watch. Let’s hope America or even China don’t interfere.

  • Greeks and Jews came to face the same conundrum. How to reconcile the universal thrust of their ideas with the tribal ethno-centrism.

    Greeks were awful proud and developed complex forms of science and governance. They came up with stuff like political democracy. It had universal implications, but Greeks had no intention of sharing the idea with barbarians. It was for Greek city-states only. But the idea eventually caught onto other civilizations.
    Jews were awful proud and developed the idea of the one and only God. It has universal implications, but Jews wanted to own this idea of God. So, they came up with the idea of the Covenant that would bind the God of all things to the Jewish tribe.

    These two contradictions would come to shape much of Western History West developed science and technology of universal import but sought to keep it to itself to gain power over others. West developed ideas of universal human rights but sought to restrict those rights to Western peoples.

    Just as Greeks saw democracy as a Greek thing and Jews saw God as a Jewish thing, America’s Founding was also marked by this great contradiction. It was, in one sense, a universal republic committed to principles that rose above tribe or nation. And yet, it was also a nation of Anglo-Germanic stock where Christianity and English were the defacto official religion and language. It was both about big OURS and a small ours. Thus, Anglo-Germanics would have a special place in the American experience. This was most obvious to Indians, blacks, and non-whites but even, to a lesser extent, to certain ethnic groups of southern or Eastern Europe.

    Universalism wasn’t the intention of the Greeks when they came up with ideas of democracy and individuality. Similarly, Jews instinctively feared the consequences of monotheism as an abstraction. Abstractions, having been distilled from a particular reality, can pass to any people, culture, or nation. It’s like every fruit has its own sugars. So, apple sugars belong to the apple, peach sugars belong to the peach, and watermelon sugars belong to the watermelons. But when sugars are extracted from those fruits, they lose their unique attachments and just become ‘universal’ sugar that can be used to sweeten anything. It’s like when piles of wood are turned into charcoal, it no longer matters which tree they came from; they just exist to burn and provide heat.

    Thus, to own and keep their own concept of God, Jews entwined the idea with the Covenant between God and Jews as the Chosen People. Thus, the Jewish God had features of a universal idea but was contractually bound with The Tribe. God was the Lord of all things, all peoples, and all everything; however, He’d chosen the Jewish People to keep the torch of greatness(like Zeus gave Athena the Aegis for safekeeping; it was her responsibility and privilege).

    A similar kind of contractualism formed with the founding of America as a both Republic premised on universal principles of human rights AND a Christian nation mainly of Anglo-Germanic stock.

    But such contractualism — combination of universalism and particularism — tends to be unstable in the long run, especially if a people rub up against diverse groups of people either through imperialism or mass migration. Historically, Jews were never alone in their world like the Swedes in Sweden, Japanese in Japan, Hawaiian natives in Hawaii, and etc. They were always invading or being invaded by other peoples, always trading with other peoples, always bickering with other peoples, always hating and co-existing with other peoples. Thus, the potent bottle of Jewish nitroglycerin got shaken left and right, hither and thither, and the formula finally exploded into a truly universalized idea of God for all peoples of the Earth.

    As for Anglo-Americans, their importation of large numbers of black Africans to toil as slaves and then huge numbers of ‘ethnic’ European immigrants — especially the feisty and pushy Jews — led to increasing pressure to transform America into a ‘proposition’. As long as America was overwhelmingly(and proudly) of Northern European stock, it could maintain both the ‘radicalism’ of the Revolution and the ‘racialism’ of the original Northern European stock. But as America filled up with growing numbers of blacks(with high birthrate) and ethnic white Americans(who strove for the same rights and privileges as the Wasps), America lurched more toward abstract universal principles(though, for some reason, it also favors three groups for special praise and recognition: All Americans must support Israel, all Americans must worship Homomania or Queertianity as the new religion, all of Anglosphere must celebrate blackness for an entire month). Thus, even though the founding ideas of the American republic/democracy had once been almost synonymous with the Anglo-American people, their eventual universalization undermined Wasp power and then white power in general, with the exception of Jewish power.

    But then, Jews didn’t so much destroy the Founding Contradiction/Hypocrisy as filch it for themselves. It’s like the pigs in ANIMAL FARM didn’t so much distribute human goodies equally among the animals as keep the choicest portions for themselves. The Founding Contradiction lives on in favoring Jews as the quintessential Americans. After all, we are told that America is about both universal commitment to ‘tolerance’ & ‘diversity AND total support of Israel as the ‘closest ally’. Thus, the core of Americanism continues to be about universalism + tribalism, i.e. Jews are ‘more equally’ American than other Americans. The crucial factor is that that tribalist element of Americanism passed from Wasps to Jews.

    Consider that all Americans are not forced to praise or support Iran, Russia, China, Germany, Mexico, Egypt, and etc.(even though Americans come from those nations), but all Americans are forced to have their taxpayer money support Israel.

    That has been the great Jewish Globalist Swindle. Jewish globalists would have us believe that Bad Old America betrayed its universal principles by favoring the Anglo-American Tribe, but thankfully, such favoritism can no longer be tolerated in Good New America where no group is favored over others and where supremacism has no place.
    But any cursory examination of America makes it plainly obvious that the system is rigged in favor of Jewish tribalism. American Universalism now mainly means ALL Americans must support Israel and obey Jewish globalists.

  • It is pleasing, and surprising, to read of Macron’s bluntness. But really…France has been up to its ears in African affairs for decades, as colonial power or not. France has a history of sending its soldiers into African countries to quell the usual local bloodbaths. France stationed black French soldiers in the Rhineland after WWI, and employed African colonial troops with the Free French Army in Europe during WWII. At the battle of Monte Cassino, French General Juin promised his Moroccan savages access to the local Italian women after the battle…He kept his promise. France’s pets have turned on her.

  • French led the way in taking out Gaddafi. France did the bidding of globalist Jews. It has no right to complain.

    • They started syrian shit as well. I find it funny how any kind of american airstrike in Syria was always trumped up, russian airstrikes were always evil, and eternal fucking gaul always got a total media blackout.

  • MAFGA! Make Africa Great Again! REPATRIATE!
    MAFGA! Make Africa Great Again! REPATRIATE!
    * The Dark Continent languishes in disease, backwardness and civil war
    * AFRICA desperately needs a massive infusion of American Blood
    * MILLIONS of young, healthy, dynamic, bold, disciplined, skilled, dedicated and determined BLACK AMERICANS
    * TRANSFORM Africa from a miserable series of corrupt dictatorships into a healthy, vibrant and modern Paradise of Capricorn
    * Usher in a New Age of Aquarius
    REPATRIATE!
    to The Magnificent African Homeland!
    MAFGA! Make Africa Great Again! REPATRIATE!
    MAFGA! Make Africa Great Again! REPATRIATE!
    ….

  • How funny would it be if some of these Arabs, Bedouins, Berbers and Tuaregs started flying Confederate flags?

    The entire ‘whites benefited from slavery’ phenomenon would end overnight if people understood the basic truth of how Africans were enslaved. Europeans did not just invade the heart of Africa and bring back negroes in cages like something out of Jumanji.

    Jewish-Iberian merchants ported in West Africa and then purchased the excess of defeated African tribes from victorious African tribes in various bush wars. There was then a glut of slave laborers and Africa became a net exporter of chattel.

    The European slave trade ended before the colonial conquest of Africa. There was never this simplistic safari version of trapping peaceful negroes. American blacks were ALREADY SLAVES IN AFRICA. If anything, white people saved them from a worse fate. Slavery wasn’t even that bad in America.

    The SJWs and cucks need to be mercilessly trolled on this narrative. If antebellum slavery was the worst thing in human history, how on earth could Southern aristocratic planters get away with positively comparing slave conditions to that of white northern factory workers?

    #BoycottBlackHistoryMonth
    #BoycottMLKday
    #HolidaysAreSoNonwhite

  • “Show me a French, Belgian, German person, who carried out trafficking between Nigeria and Libya. This person doesn’t exist. So, these days in Africa, there are Africans who make other Africans slaves, this is the reality.”

    This would also be the case for how slavery has worked between Nigeria and Libya since human civilisation (of sorts) first formed.

  • Though ‘democracy’ is pegged as a quintessential ‘Western Value’, the fact is most of Western History hasn’t been marked by democracy or even republican forms of government. Most Greek city-states were not democratic in the manner of Athens, and even Athens underwent profoundly alternated among forms of governance. Roman Republic soon gave way to imperial rule, and the long stretch of Western European history from the Fall of Rome to the early 20th century was characterized by feudalism, aristocracy, theocracy, and monarchy than by ‘democracy’.

    Does this mean that most of Western History was not ‘western’ since it wasn’t ‘democratic’? Furthermore, Byzantine and Russian Europe hardly experienced any democracy at all except in the late modern period. And a huge chunk of what was once Byzantium came under Turkish, Kurdish, or Arab rule where democracy is either non-existent or practiced differently from ‘Western’ standards. Also, the historical lessonof democracy has been as much about failure as success, doom as well as hope. Democracy, by its ruthless autistic-logic, almost invariably leads to rootlessness, confusion, decadence, and demise.

    For democracy to survive, it must be fascist. This is why the fascist-democracies of Iran, Israel, and Turkey face more secure futures that the decadent-democracies of the West that says stuff like “there is no such thing as French Culture” or “Great Britain has always been a ‘nation of immigrants’.” America’s rise to prominence owed to its being a fascist-democracy, a land of liberty and freedom that was nevertheless bound by powerful sense of racial identity, cultural heritage, and core moral values. Democracy without fascist themes to keep it bound to a people and culture will become like a hot air balloon that euphorically lifts into the air only to run out of gas and then come down crashing like the one in the opening scene of ANDREI RUBLEV.

    Just imagine the future of Israel if Jews were to adopt the autistic-logic of abstract democracy over the current fascist-democracy. Israeli democracy would go from freedom & liberty for Jews in a Jewish State to ‘tolerance’ and ‘diversity’ to any bunch of mobs who want to invade Israel to enjoy ‘universal rights’. Since the Iron Law of Human Organismic Behavior is “poorer folks move to richer folks”, Israel will soon be swamped by Africans and Arabs from less developed parts of the world.

    That is precisely what is happening to the decadent-democracies of Europe, and if left unchecked, it will mean their doom and downfall. A fascist-democracy uses freedom and liberty to protect and strengthen the people of a particular nation. A decadent-democracy offers freedom and liberty to foreign invaders to take over and destroy the native population deracinated by PC.

    Deracinators or Deracists are the biggest danger to the Advanced World.

    • Liberal democracy is the worst form of government ever devised, including all others. While fascism and others fail due to poor leadership, democracy, with its delusional belief in equality, has failure built-in.

    • America is neither a democracy nor a republic today. America is an occupied country – occupied by the federal government. They do not represent us, and they do not rule by the consent of the governed.

    • “Just imagine the future of Israel if Jews were to adopt the autistic-logic of abstract democracy over the current fascist-democracy.”

      It is called Meretz- has 5 of the 120 Knesset seats. You know they are the bad guys because they are supported by Sarah Silvermen and support affirmative action. Heck it even comes with its own sex scandals-
      https://www.timesofisrael.com/meretz-suspends-senior-member-accused-of-sexually-assaulting-a-minor/

Leave a Reply to Nero Cancel reply