Bike lanes. My old nemesis.
They’re here now too. Well, I don’t know how long they’ve been here to be fair. But I have an
obsession pet theory about bike lanes and how they lead to SWPLification and doom.
There’s nothing wrong with them per se, but they are a sign that things are getting too nice and once things get too nice, the people go soft and then the city is screwed…
They aren’t doing enough to fight the encroachment of liberal ideas.
But Warsaw still has a lot of SWPLing up to do before it hits critical levels.
The girls are quite nice and thin and pretty. They don’t have the same ice cold “metro face” going on that Russian girls do. They’re all easy smiles and “yes, I speak English:))”
And the non-White population? It really is negligible. Most of them are all around the central train station, but again, not too bad at all. Unlike “Fortress Budapest” which was underwhelming, the memes have been confirmed this time, Warsaw is indeed overwhelmingly White.
I must have mentioned this before, but you can tell a lot about a city by looking at its graffiti.
In anticipation of the Nationalist march, Swedish Antifa made the trip over to sticker up the city with their propaganda. But there are plenty of celtic crosses and “ultra” stuff out there on the streets as well. The All-Polish Youth group told us that many nationalist youths in Warsaw were preparing to hunt out Antifa on the eve of the march and fight them.
Not sure if this will happen or not, we’ll have to see.
Looking past the people and the graffiti and the bike lanes, you can’t help but notice that the cityscape is quite ugly in Warsaw. But also almost Cyberpunk-esque, which is a redeeming quality, to be sure. It’s dominated by these 90s style glass and steel towers with the glowing neon signs of all the big Western corporation’s names emblazoned on them.
There are a few parts of the city where some of the old town was preserved, but Warsaw is mostly a mishmash of Polish-Soviet commie blocks and newer Bauhaus-inspired architecture. New York’s Twin Towers must have made quite the impression on Poles who visited after the collapse of the USSR.
They built loving imitations all over their capital city.
By the way, right outside my window there’s a commie block being torn down. I can hear the stones crumbling and the mechanical hissing of the claw thing tearing it down. It is one of the last ones on the block. In its place, they’ll probably build something similar to what’s already been built around it.
Maybe they’ll soon destroy the commie block I’m staying in now too.
I can’t think of a better metaphor for Poland than this picture. Eager to destroy its Soviet past and join the West in all of its capitalistic splendor.
But perhaps that is no longer the case, and the youth are waking up to the false song of Westernism. I certainly hope so.
We touched on the topic at the All Polish Youth conference. Guests from all over Europe who have been coming for years returned and commented that they believe the city is getting worse. The Spanish delegate said:
There are more foreign companies here now than before and there are worrying Liberal elements at work. Poland needs to be careful.
He also confirmed all of our suspicions on AltRight.com about Catalonia, but I’ll save that story for a rainy day.
In response, the Polish MP who was the host and speaker confirmed that although ostensibly a Conservative party is in power, they are not pressing their advantage and are squandering an opportunity to advance their agenda.
…which seems to be a constant for Conservatives the world over.
They aren’t doing enough to fight the encroachment of liberal ideas. For example, there is a state-channel now that provides news and social commentary from a conservative angle. But there are hundreds of other unfiltered channels on TV where you can see everything that (((Hollywood))) is working overtime to pump out.
The Polish Conservatives in power don’t see this as a problem, it turns out.
But you don’t have to be an oracle to see what will happen if the destructive ideas flowing out of the aquifers of POZ in the West are not drained.
On the other hand, we shouldn’t be tempted to try looking too far into the future with Poland. Right now they are struggling with Brussels in a fight to retain their sovereignty and to refuse multiculturalism. The results of that political struggle will no doubt shape the destiny of Poland going forward.
Will the Poles be able to resist the march of Brussel’s tyranny? I’m on the fence about this question.
Speaking of marches, there’s a big one coming up tomorrow. I’ll take a look and then make up my mind.
I’m getting tired of this negativity talk when it comes to European nationalism. “Oh, it’s all over!” Despite showing many stories of Eastern Europe fighting back, despite the large growing amount of nationalist marches ALL over Europe, you say “It will be nonwhite by 2049.” Why do we need the anti-whites and leftists when we have self-hating whites–even so called “white nationalists”–putting out this defeatist propaganda? You say we whites are strong and will fight back, but then you also say whites are losing and being taken over. So which is it? Disappointed in this piece.
A nuclear armed Israel will never allow a white ethno state. They will nuke it to oblivion, or get someone else to do it.
Iran might deal with them. 🙂 Probably one of the few examples of supporting the muds. Of course in the end I hope they all wipe each other out. That would be a best case scenario.
If one side in a civil war cannot win without massive foreign support, it means it has a fatal weakness.
Take the Vietnam War.
All North Vietnamese soldiers were Vietnamese.
In contrast, South Vietnam relied on US troops and even South Korean troops to prop up its regime and system.
North had the decisive advantage. Its military was manned with proud patriots.
South was decadent and under neo-imperialist mentality. It lacked conviction except profits and pleasure. So, no one was willing to fight and die for what the system stood for.
So, the South relied on what were mercenary forces from the US and South Korea.
US soldiers had no idea why they were there. Something about stopping evil communism and all that. But most Americans didn’t care and grew cynical. They had low morale and had to be bribed with R&R to keep fighting. They were given generous rations to drink, party, and bang whores.
And S. Koreans fought as a mercenary force as they got the same pay. And it was a huge boost to the SK economy. But without US money, SK had no reason or will to fight.
In contrast, North Vietnamese were fighting for nation and pride. They had a sense of value beyond money and materialism.
North had the will, the cohesion, and the conviction all on its own.
South had no will, no pride. It had to be propped up by outside mercenary forces. Without them, South was doomed, and indeed the North soon prevailed over the South once the US left.
This dynamics is reflected partly in the crisis of the West.
There is a civil war between globalist whites and nationalist whites. In many white nations, the nationalist whites have a decisive advantage over the globalist whites.
Nationalist whites tend to have strong sense of roots and identity. They are more likely to have a sense of core morality. They are more likely to have national and racial pride and cultural pride. As such, they have a sense of meaning, direction, and power in being what they are and being with others like themselves.
In contrast, globalist whites(despite their education and affluence) tend to be decadent, demoralized(except in the virtue-signaling of self-loathing; their moral pride is predicated on racial suicide), directionless, rootless, and spineless(again, except in denouncing their own race).
As such, they are bound to be the minority of whites in any healthy nation where whites have woken up to what’s really at stake.
The reason why some white nations have more globalist whites than nationalist whites is because the elite institutions are controlled by globalist Jews and their cuck-collaborators who spread PC and Homogro pop culture to whites from cradle.
But if white national consciousness were given a chance, it is bound to grow and spread.
It’s like most Vietnamese had been resigned to French imperialism and just went along. But once the nationalist fire began spreading, it could hardly be contained.
Just like the South Vietnamese felt they had no chance without foreign mercenaries, globalist whites(who are really unwitting servile shills of Jewish globalists) are beginning to feel that they have no chance without foreign mercenaries of Diversity or ‘immigrants’. These are immigrant-mercenaries or ‘immercenaries’ in the sense that their ONLY commitment to the West is materialist. They have no concern for western identity, culture, or history. They just come for money and materialism. For those goodies, they are willing to destroy nationalist whites… just like South Korean soldiers were willing to kill tons of Vietnamese nationalists for $$$.
Without Immercenaries, Virginia would still be a red state. It was the immercenaries who turned California into a blue state. Indeed, many stares would be red if not for immercenaries.
Granted, there is one crucial difference between US and Divided Vietnam during the war. The nationalist Viets had a solid base in the North. So, the Viet Cong in the South could rely on support from the total patriotic power in the North.
In contrast, all of the US is like South Vietnam. All of it is occupied by the GLOB. All the governments, all the institutions, all the industries. So, nationalist whites(a more accurate term than ‘white nationalists’) are like Viet Cong but without the backing of solid base of power.
In North Vietnam, all the institutions were controlled by patriots. So, the Viet Cong could at least rely on hardcore nationalist Vietnam at war with South Vietnam under neo-imperialist US hegemony.
In contrast, the Alt Right and nationalist whites have no such backing. Some see Russia as the support system of nationalist whites, but Russia is non-interventionist and, being an imperial nation in its own right, not so keen on ethno-nationalism.
Still, once true nationalism replaces cuck-conservatism, the nationalist whites will be far more passionate and committed than the globalist whites whose main passions are ridiculous homo-worship, Negro-worship, servility to Zionists, and racial self-hated.
In the end, a people who love their own kind have advantage over those who hate their own kind. This is why globalist whites everywhere fear that they cannot win in the long run against nationalist whites. They can win ONLY with the mercenary masses of non-white immigrants who side with globalist whites PURELY for material reasons. $$$
If the only means of political contention will be elections, the globalist whites might prevail because immercenaries, as ‘new citizens’, will vote for globalism.
But if it comes to a shooting war, nationalist whites will be like the North Vietnamese and the Viet Cong. They will have something to live for, kill for, die for.
In contrast, the immercenaries will fight only for money. As for globalist whites, what is their great cause? Racial suicide. Is that something worth dying for?
Bad Optics today at the Warsaw Rally. I saw lots of Fascist symbols and signs stating “White Europe”. We need to appeal to normies with white polo shirts and MAGA hats.
Nigga please. Mussolini did nothing wrong. And people are waking up to the fact that roughly 70 million non-jews also died in WWII as compared to the fictious 6 gorillion, more like roughly 270,000. Most migrated to Israel. Hence, there’s nothing wrong with the symbols, because there’s nothing to hide. It’s the communists who should be ashamed of that hammer and sickle from a 100 million deaths. The star and crescent has even possibly more blood on it’s hands. Look up “The Hindu Kush” was a mountain range in Pakistan which unknown numbers of Inidian hindus (but in the millions) were brought to be slaughtered by jihadis. It’s unknown because no-one has ever been able to venture there and excavate it.
Check out Hunter Wallace’s Twitter Feed for today’s Nationalist Rally in Poland…..
Around 60,000 showed up…….
Huge WHITE Pill………
The Jews and Cucks are Hating and pushing their Usual ‘Muh Nazi’ Propaganda…….
I’m Proud to have Significant Polish Ancestry…….
Once deemed the White Trash of Europe……..
Now, the Nobility……the Strength……the Courage……the Power……the WILL to SURVIVE………
I’m an American who lived in Warsaw from 1995 to 2014. I enjoyed the my time working there as a business English
teacher. Cold beer and warm women. Low level of crime mostly due to the lack of “diversity”; few blacks and Muslims. The one downside was that I worked with American and British TEFL teachers who were so pozzed about diversity; most of them a bunch of losers with maybe a liberal arts degree, unable to get a real job in their home country.
Haven’t been to Poland personally, but from what I understand, their wokeness is mostly limited to opposing Islam. It’s not a small plus and definitely praise worthy, but those who care about other aspects are bound to be disappointed.
Met a Polish guy a few years back. He told me his Brazilian friends are amazed at how easy it is for black guys to hook up with hot blondes in Poland. This was corroborated by posts I read on a PUA site by guys who had visited the country, saying the best looking Polish girls almost have an exclusive taste for the visiting black dick.
Met a very sexy Polish blonde about 6 years ago. She was here for the summer. Asked around among those who worked with her and it turned out she was juggling multiple dicks with a strong preference for chocolate.
Nice locations and scenes
Performed by students in Nashville (who forgot to pull up fader for keyboard)
A few months ago I flew to Warsaw on a plane that was half full of Indians. When I arrived I saw them all over the city center, from restaurants to riding bikes for uber-eats. Poland may have kept muslims out but it’s now importing cheap labor from the third world.
This article is appropriate.
“And in a way, whites who welcome mass-colonization from Third World are practicing a kind of soft subconscious supremacism. They feel, “You darkies wanna leave your own inferior nations and cultures because you know that the white world and white people are better. You want to live in our superior world because you are incapable of creating anything so good in your own world.”
There is quite something about that especially in the Protestant north, the most racist eugenicist parts of Europe before 20th century (Sweden had a rabid eugenics program even after wwII, Iceland still does abortions to eliminate the unwanted). You have the british royals raving on and on about ‘overpopulation’ and ‘we have to do something about all these people’. Devil’s minions. This hatred for all humanity. This mixture of protestantism, evolutionism and eugenics makes them the most ‘advanced’ liberals, even as nazis Protestants had this darwinian liberalism of anglos. Whom God would destroy he first makes mad. It’s a punishment from God what else. Now Poland is being strung along to reject the Church for protestant humanist doctrine, capitalist world village, glass and steel for a new babel.
Your regular closed society fascist truly does end being more respectful of other people’s regions and countries as he is content about his own to live more connected with whatever limited resources Providence gave his country.
Some good melodic Europen music
“I’m a black negro African slave and want my rights!
If U R not colorblind, you’re a nazi and SS-member!”
Counterquestion: “If I would be born in Guinea as a diplomats-child,
you would find it ‘ridiculous’ that I claim ‘I’m more African than you!'”
“…that people forcibly removed from their homes…”
From which home this “Brit” was forcibly removed?
Vox Day is a goof and not to be taken seriously. All said and done, he’s a plus to the movement but a rather shallow and snippy character. And he sometimes goes for low-hanging fruits like Andrew Anglin whose only value is as class clown.
“1. The Alt Right is of the political right… Socialists are not Alt Right. Progressives are not Alt Right. Liberals are not Alt Right. Communists, Marxists, Marxians, cultural Marxists, and neocons are not Alt Right. National Socialists are not Alt Right.”
Big problem with this. Even though people who call themselves ‘socialists’ are not Alt Right, Alt Right is open to socialism as component of economics. Alt Right is neo-fascist or social-democratic in accepting both socialism and capitalism. Indeed, this capitalism vs socialism dichotomy is rather useless in our world. When capitalist had free rein in the 19th century and when communists called for abolition of private property, one could speak of capitalists vs socialists. However, esp following WWII, both Europe and US have adopted economic policies that combine capitalism and socialism. Even American Conservatives who are all for free enterprise would not vote for politicians who would end social security and other government programs. And even American Liberals who call themselves ‘socialists’ wanna live in nations with powerful capitalist economies. Just consider. If socialists are really and truly socialist, why not be like Amish folks? Why not get together and work on communes and share everything? But so-called socialists in US and EU don’t act this way. They always try to move to the most affluent urban areas and try to live off capitalists. They write books and plays in the hopes that the affluent class will buy them. As ‘artists’, they seek rich patrons to sponsor and fund their projects. As academics, they teach at universities funded by rich donors. Consider the ton of money Harvard and Yale have due to donors. These donors made their money in capitalism, not socialism. And if these ‘socialists’ are into artisanal work, they make fancy stuff for rich folks. Artisanal beer, Artisanal candy, Artisanal candles, etc. They are ‘socialist’ in the sense that Europeans used to be ‘Christian’. The label makes them sound noble, caring, and into ‘social justice’. But they would never want to live in a socialist nation. They want to feed on capitalist success. Your average ‘socialist’ moves to glitzy cities like San Fran or NY.
In the 60s, some ‘socialist’ types did try to live in communes, but it didn’t work. Unlike Amish who are disciplined, humble, orderly, and virtuous — I guess Mormons are free-market materialist Amish — , the ‘socialists’ were into hedonism, drugs, orgies, and etc. They were more into bumming off others than working for the common good. It’s like the hippie commune in EASY RIDER where the folks are more into long hair, weed, and skinny-dipping than getting up in the morning and doing chores like milking cows and making butter. Look what the hippie ‘socialists’ did to Woodstock. If not for the wage-slave Portosan man, the place would have been covered with shi*.
Anyway, Alt Right seeks to move beyond this ‘capitalism vs socialism’ dichotomy. While socialism can be anti-right, so can capitalism. The root of rightism is nationalism and identity in race and culture. Capitalists will easily betray their own race and nation just for more profits or status. To a capitalist, profits and prestige matter more than anything. Anything for profits.
Worse, once a society turns hedonist and shameless, capitalism begins to focus on vice industry to feed on people’s weakness for fast pleasure in food, trash culture, sex, and etc. Shameless and hedonistic capitalism is the basis of globalist control of the populace.
True Power comes from self-control. Those who lose control over themselves won’t be able to control much else. It’s like once American Indians surrendered to the pleasures of firewater, they lost the pride and will. And Chinese on opium were lost in lala-land while their families and nation were being sold off to imperialists. White people are lost because so many of them are addicted to the opiate of pop culture.
And it’s about mindless excessive appetites, indulgences, and therapies. It says pig out, hump all over, laugh like tard at OW MY BALLS(see IDIOCRACY), play dumb video games, and worship comic book super heroes. It promotes infantilism, and this is reflected in the political culture of celebrity, vanity, and therapy. So, there is babyish PC that divides the world in goodies and baddies. And progs cry and wail like babies and call people ‘racist’ and ‘white supremacist’ and ‘homophobic’ and chant slogans like ‘black lives matter’. And then, there are all these therapies that, instead of telling people to get real and grow up, indulge them in their self-aggrandizing baby-emotions…. like General Silvestra who indulged that lowlife black ‘hate hoaxer’ who was responsible for the KKK vandalism.
Indeed, it is interesting how the very people who push this EXTREMISM in appetites and ideology are the ones who accuse Alt Right and any basic patriots as ‘far right’ and ‘extreme’. Alt Right is calling for self-control over appetites. It’s not calling for globalist imperialism or war-mongering. It’s calling for the right of each Western nation to survive as and for what it is. How is that extreme? In contrast, globalists call for More Wars and More Intervention even after such ventures destroyed much of the Middle East and led to useless ‘new cold war’ with Russia. Globalists also say the native peoples of US and EU must be replaced by nasty non-white ingrates. Yet, that is considered ‘normal’ while basic nationalism 101 that is pro-peace and pro-borders is denounced as ‘far right’ and ‘extremist’. What a crazy world. Consider Francis Fukuyama, aka George Soros’ dog. He should be called Fukyomama because this lowlife is so convinced that wars and mass invasions are justified because they hasten the ‘end of history’ when it’s really hastening the End of Humanity.
“2. The Alt Right is an ALTERNATIVE to the mainstream conservative movement in the USA”
Alt Right is that but it is also an alternative to old-style far right of white politics and white supremacism as represented by organizations like KKK and Neo-Nazis. It is also an alternative to the grim and dour racial apocalyptic views of men like William Pierce.
KKK was too hick. Neo-Nazis were too deranged and demented. And men like Pierce came across as odd, to say the least. On the one hand, they were very bourgeois and respectable, but their views were nutty or insane.
And then, there were men like William Shockley who didn’t crank out nutter visions like TURNER DIARIES. But Alt Right differs from them as well. The problem with men like Shockley was they thought they could persuade people with rational arguments and facts alone. But any socio-political movement must have vision, passion, and the prophetic thing. Shockley never had it. Jared Taylor and his kind have a broader vision, but they too are focused on rational discussion. Alt Right understands that cautious rational arguments are not enough. People want to be swept up by a collective passion that stirs their hearts and minds. And this is why Alt Right is anti-stuffy and not very bourgeois in its attitude and approach. It is looser, even bohemian, and Spencer certainly has edgy tendencies. Also, Alt Right understands that even race-rationalists like Shockley(and perhaps even James Watson) are motivated by something more than facts and logic. They are pro-white because they are white and feel comfortable being white and want to preserve white civilization. It’s not just about IQ. Would Shockley have been okay if blacks were to gain equal intelligence with whites and then humped tons of white women to make mulatto babies? My guess is NO. So, it’s a vision of OUR PEOPLE and OUR CULTURE and OUR LAND. Alt Right is more honest about the roots of the movement. It’s not mainly about rational discussion of IQ. It’s about Race and Culture. In this respect, George Hee-Hawley is right in his wussy-boy book on the Alt Right. Hee-Hawley is too much of a Pee-Wee-Herman to be a proud white man. He has characteristics of CucKen Burns and looks like a dork. And by ‘racism’, he doesn’t mean race-ism but ‘nasty nah nah racism’. Still, he is right to understand that Racial Identity is at the core of Alt Right. Alt Right has a sense of racial and cultural family. And it is for this reason that Alt Right understands that nationalism must be a kind of ethno-socialism. After all, Zionism is a nationalism that necessitates racial-socialism. Zionism says that the richest Jew must see even poor Jews in Israel(and around the world) as fellow brethren. So, rich Jews in Israel must favor poor Jews than rich gentiles. He may do business with rich gentiles, but when all is said and done, even a poor Jew is more his brother than a rich gentile is. Indeed, Jewish-Americanism is racial socialism. After all, why did Jews push the US government to save Soviet Jews where there were plenty of people far worse off than Jews in the USSR? Because Jews cared about fellow Jews. Now, if Jews are totally beyond race, rich Jews should identify mainly with rich gentiles. But even as Jews told rich gentiles to betray and abandon their own kind, rich Jews never stopped caring for less fortunate Jews, like in USSR or Romania. Rich Jews bribed Ceucescu to let Romania’s Jews to immigrate to Israel. This is the basis of Jewish Power. Racial-Socialism or Nationalism among all Jews. Jews fear that if white gentiles regain the same mindset(as white elites during the New Deal cared about poor whites like those in GRAPES OF WRATH), they will lead and serve white masses than serve rich Jews. This is why Jews push libertarianism on whites. It serves as a wedge between rich successful whites and masses of whites. Jews also push socialism on whites, but it’s ‘anti-racist’ kind that forbids rich whites to care about less fortunate whites. If rich or successful whites are to be ‘noble’, they must take care of non-whites… .like Bill Gates spending billions of dollars to help blacks and others but never whites. Racial-socialism is good enough for Jews but never good for whites by rules of PC.
This is what the Alt Right opposes, and this is why it is feared. To Jewish globalists, ‘unite the right’ sounds like Unite the White from top to bottom. This is why Spencer calls on Trump to pass Single Payer. All this ‘muh free enterprise’ has only helped to drive a wedge between white have-lots and white have-lesses.
That said, another reason for Alt Right’s appeal is it is the ONLY force out there that is willing to speak honestly about the Power. Mainstream Media of both ‘right’ and ‘left’ are all owned by the Globalist Establishment. Now, there are many alternative voices, organizations, and etc. Alt-Right doesn’t own the ‘alternative’ label, which has a long pedigree. There are alternative voices on the Left, Libertarianism, white nationalism, anarchism, feminism, and etc. Esp in the age of the internet, there are tons of alternative voices with so many bloggers and cloggers.
So, why has the Alt Right stood out from the rest of the alternative media and voices? Because it is the ONLY ‘movement’ that really doesn’t give a crap about PC. Now, I’m defining PC in a broader way. Not just globo-proggy PC(even though that dominates current discourse) but far-right PC. KKK, Neo-Nazis, white supremacists, Holocaust-Deniers, and etc. have their own thick-skulled PC. Though their PC is ‘politically incorrect’ to Mainstream PC, it is also about mental straitjackets and iron dogma. For the white supremacist types, Hitler did no wrong, or it would have been better if Germans won. Or Stalin intended to invade first, and Hitler only attacked out of defense. Or everything Jewish is evil or suspect. Or the Shoah is one big lie and the only Jews who died was due to starvation under duress of war.
What the white supremacists and proggy PC have in common is this kind of dogmatism. Anyone who has tried to discuss reality with a communist, BLM moron, homomaniac, radical feminist, libertarian, or some such know it’s like talking to a brick wall. It’s like Stefan Molyneux the baldie losing his last few hairs while trying to talk logic with a commie.
And we don’t expect too much from Evangelicals who just rely on faith and hallelujah and glory be and all that childlike stuff. They are sheeple. Even when Evangelicals oppose homo agenda, it’s not based on truth or moral logic but on the Bible, as if modern society can be organized around what was written 1000s of yrs ago.
Now, one would expect far-left commies and far-right white supremacists(for whom supremacism is a crutch because they are fat, low IQ, morons usually) to be thick-skulled. In contrast, we might expect liberals and moderate conservatives to be open-minded, intellectually honest, and respectful of free speech and etc. But not so. PC permeates into every corner of Western Discourse. So, moderate respectable conservatives will claim to champion liberty, constitution, and free speech(along with traditional values), but they run scared and shi* their pants when faced with honest discussion of race and Jewish power. Today, most of these conservatives don’t even have the balls to say NO to homomania. Even Charles Murray the baldie cucked out on homo stuff. And these conservatives never oppose censorship of voices that speak truth to Jewish power. Mark Steyn talks big about Muslims but never about Zionists and their bad deeds in West Bank.
As for liberals, most of them are illiberal. On many issues and subjects, they are indeed bona fide liberals in the best sense of the word. But when anything intersects with issues of race or steps on shibboleths of Proggy PC, the liberal minds close the shutters and turn illiberal.
Liberals go for Compassion Supremacism or Sensitivity-Supremacism that says certain groups deserve more love, care, praise, and protection than others. So, even though Liberals will pretend to denounce all forms of ‘bigotry’, they care far less about negative things said about Muslims, Chinese, Iranians, Russians, or Mexicans than about the Holy Three: Jews, Negroes, and Homos. Also, while liberals are open to any general subject, they shut their minds when the subject encroaches on their holy taboos. Take the issue of Culture and Work Ethic. Suppose someone says the problem with Russia is the lack of work ethic compared to, say, Germans and Japanese. Liberals may agree or disagree, but they will listen to the argument with an open mind. But suppose you then say the same about blacks. Suddenly, the liberal will gets antsy and panicky and fulminate and call you ‘racist’ and etc.
Or, suppose you say the problem with China is corruption. As such, any Western businessman who wants to do business should keep his guard up and learn something about Chinese culture, attitudes, and way of doing things. Again, the liberal may agree or disagree, but he will discuss the issue. But if you say Jews have become very corrupt and abusive and that we need to be more critical of Jewish power, the liberal(esp if Jewish) will have conniptions, tell you to shut up, and say the discussion is OVER. This is why liberals have become useless on certain key issues. They are still good on many subjects but they cannot honesty grapple with certain matters due to their holy taboos. No matter how committed they are to free speech and open-minded discourse, those principles are overridden by The Taboo. Liberal minds have been programmed that way.
Also, PC won’t allow honest discussion of Shoah. While Holocaust-Deniers are either crazy, demented, or obsessively contrarian(some people just like to be the odd-man-out, like believing in flat earth or faked apollo landing), not everyone who questions aspects of Shoah are ‘deniers’. David Cole is not a denier, but he’s been labeled as such because he refused to conform to the Official Narrative that said 6 million died in such and such manner. Too many Jewish Liberals will label as ‘denier’ anyone who dares to raise questions. Or they will label as ‘deniers’ even though who adhere to the official narrative but try to understand WHY the Nazis did what they did as extreme reaction to radical excesses of Jews and the times(that sought scapegoats of one form or another all across the political spectrum).
So, we have white supremacists with their dogma. Because they can’t move beyond Heil Hitler, they can’t be true members of Alt Right.
As for everyone else, from the far-left commies to globalist liberals to far-libertarians to Conservatism Inc., they are all restrained by the Taboo of the Holy Three. They cannot speak honestly about Jewish Power. The far-left will denounce Zionism but is loathe to connect the dots between Zionism and Jewish power in the US. Libertarians claim to support total freedom, but they turn PC on issues related to blacks and homos. And Conservative Inc. denounces the Left without mentioning that the globalist Left is largely funded and led by Jews. Con Inc. won’t even face the fact that Homomania is a Jewish proxy agenda. And even as Conservatives denounce crime, they will not state the obvious fact that blacks commit more crime because they are more muscular and more aggressive.
This is where Alt Right is different. You don’t have to be nazi-tard to join. And on issues that command so much silence, cuckery, timidity, and cowardice, the Alt Right speaks freely: Jewish Power, Black thuggery, and Homo degeneracy.
And yet, on issues like homos, it refuses to follow the dumb Evangelical handbook. While Alt Right opposes the homo agenda — making homomania the New Normal — , it accepts the science on homosexuality, i.e. that some people are born homo, it’s not their ‘fault’, and they should be allowed to be homo and do their thing. And if they have talent, it should be praised and admired. If Alt Right had played a role in the homo debate, it would have been more interesting. But while the media and powers-that-be were going all-homo, what did we get from the Right? Silence from Con Inc. that was so afraid of alienating Jews(as even Neocons were pushing homo crap) and ‘Muh Bible’ from Evangelicals as if social policy can be decided by what’s in the Bible.
This is why Alt Right made a difference. And this is what the Alt Right must never lose sight of. As Alt Right coalesces more into a real movement, if it insists on dogma and taboos, it will lose its edge and its appeal even to those who detest what the Core Ideology of the Alt Right stands for. The fact is even radical anti-race-ists have been provoked and stimulated by the Alt Right that is so willing to talk about issues that are forbidden by PC all across the spectrum from far left to Con Inc. (And far-right Nazitards have their own PC taboos. ‘Muh Fuhrer’.)
It’s like the European Marxists and Frankfurt School gained a degree of respect even from elements of the Right. While the Soviet Left turned utterly Stalinist and statist-dogmatic and predictable, the European neo-Marxists were interesting in their critique of modernity, materialism, capitalism, individualism, and Soviet communism. And even Noam Chomsky, Michel Foucault, and Gore Vidal had reluctant admirers on the Right because they approached and criticized American Empire from angles ignored by mainstream media or hardline leftist.
Still, even alt-left figures were bound by the Taboos. Chomsky was critical of Zionism but didn’t connect it with Jewish American Power, nor did he address the ethnic character of US media monopoly. After all, if US media were monopolized by Mexican-Americans or Muslim-Americans, the result would be different.
Due to WWII and Shoah-guilt as New Religion of the Secular West, the West was loathe to speak honestly about Jewish Power. Also, due to Black Slavery narrative and anti-imperialism — and blacks as the colorful face of ‘social justice’ — , blacks became objects of semi-worship, culminating in the Magic Mountain Negro or Montenegro in GREEN MILE. And as pop culture turned the West into a hedonistic celebrapolis of narcissism and excess, it wasn’t long before homos rode on that wave to become the neo-angels of globalism. Esp with the help of Jewish Media, homos spun their self-created disaster — AIDS epidemic — as their own kind of ‘holocaust’.
And then, the media and academia turned into endless fests of praising Jews, blacks, and homos. Indeed, Americanism(which also infects the EU) is about little more than praising Jews, blacks, and homos. No ideology tops the ‘iconology’ of the Holy Three. You can say you disagree with the fundamental principles of America’s founding, and that’s okay. But if you say anything that runs counter to the spirit of the Holy Three, you are done for.
Alt Right is iconoclastic force against the Holy Three. It is more effective in challenging the Taboo because it doesn’t play by the dogmatic White Supremacist neo-Nazi playbook. If anything, the Neo-Nazis could almost be seen as part of PC proggism. It’s no wonder that so many Jews pretended to be Nazis. It’s no wonder so many FBI types infiltrated the movement. According to PC, any kind of white identity or white interests is NAZI or KKK, thus automatically discrediting itself. And the white supremacist morons obliged this narrative with their retarded gestures, dumb narratives, and beer-belly ubermensch ‘larping’.
Even as proggy PC detested the Neo-Nazi-KKK morons, it saw propaganda value in white supremacists making total fools of themselves. It’s like the Globo Media found the Westboro church so useful in making the anti-homo side seem like a bunch of Christian-tard nutters. According to the PC narrative, any pro-white person must be ‘nazi’ and anyone who opposes the homo agenda must be a crazy Christian lunatic protesting military funerals.
But Alt Right didn’t play to this script. It cogently laid out how it sees the Power Dynamic in the West, and it’s been more right than wrong, easily done since PC has suppressed so much necessary criticism of the Power. The ripple effects have been that even anti-Alt-Right people are more willing to discuss certain issues. The Overton window has been shifted, if only slightly.
“5. The Alt Right is openly and avowedly nationalist. It supports all nationalisms and the right of all nations to exist, homogeneous and unadulterated by foreign invasion and immigration.”
Derb: “No problem with that. We should, however, bear in mind what a knotty thing nationalism can be. There is a case to be made—a conservative case—for big, old, long-established nations resisting disaggregation. Does Catalan nationalism trump Spanish nationalism?”
The answer to Derbyshire’s question is Localism. Let Spanish and Catalans arrive at what is best for them. Non-Spanish and Non-Catalans might offer their advice and opinions, but it should be handled as local affair between Cats and Spans.
“7. The Alt Right is anti-equalitarian.”
Actually, it’s better to say Alt Right is honestly anti-equalitarian. Let’s face it. NO ONE believes in equality. Everyone with sense knows that Jews are smarter than Gypsies, West Africans can outrun Hindus, and Germans are, on average, taller than Mexicans.
Alt Right is just honest about what everyone knows. I mean do Jews really believe than any Bolivian peasant can excel in finance in huge numbers? Do blacks really feel that Chinese are suddenly gonna win in 100m sprints?
“8. The Alt Right is scientodific. It presumptively accepts the current conclusions of the scientific method (scientody), while understanding a) these conclusions are liable to future revision, b) that scientistry is susceptible to corruption”
Derb: “It’s what? The word “scientody” is not known to dictionary.com; nor is it in my 1971 OED with supplement; nor in my 1993 Webster’s.”
Vox Day is a sci-fi writer and them fellers have these funny ideas. He’s just being sciencefictionoid with terminology.
Derb: “There is a large body of solidly-established scientific results that are not liable to future revision. Saturn is further from the Sun at any point of its orbit than Jupiter is at any point of its. A water molecule has two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom. Natural selection plays an important role in the evolution of life.”
True enough, but I think Vox Day was talking about social sciences. After all, theories on atoms and stars have no bearing on matters of politics and society. But scientific matters relating to humans have huge relevance and implications. And there has been too much ‘scientistry — scientific sophistry — in the field. Scientistry is like quack dentistry where the wrong tooth is pulled out. So, even though the black tooth must be removed to stop the pain, white ones are yanked out. It’s Clouseauean Dentistry.
Derb: “Again, not bad as a first approximation, but this ignores a lot of feedback loops. Has politics not affected culture this past 72 years in North Korea? Did not North Korea and South Korea have the same culture a hundred years ago?”
True, but if SK were to reunite with any nation, wouldn’t it be easier with NK than with Japan even though SK and Japan are economically and politically similar?
Or look at Israel. Jews came from capitalist nations, communist nations, Muslim-majority nations, Christian-majority nations, and etc. Many spoke different languages and few knew Hebrew. There were religious Jews, secular Jews, and etc. But they made it work because they were bound by identity as the basis.
Now, imagine creating a new nation based solely on creed. Suppose German Christians, African Christians, Chinese Christians, Mexican Christians, Arab Christians, and etc all came together to form a nation based on Jesus. Would it work as well? Or imagine a new nation founded on shared ideology of capitalism. Suppose French capitalists, Swedish capitalists, Nigerian capitalists, Turkish capitalist, Japanese capitalists, Indonesian capitalists, Pakistani capitalists, and etc all formed a nation. How long would it last?
Thus far, US and Canada has held together despite diversity because there has been a Core Majority and Core narrative. But as they fray, can these nations remain together or function well based on shared general credos in ‘muh constitution’ and ‘muh liberty’?
“10. The Alt Right is opposed to the rule or domination of any native ethnic group by another, particularly in the sovereign homelands of the dominated peoples. The Alt Right is opposed to any non-native ethnic group obtaining excessive influence in any society through nepotism, tribalism, or any other means.”
Derb: “As several commenters pointed out, the Iroquois and the Sioux might have something to say about that. Bitching about historical injustices is such an SJW thing, though, I can’t bring myself to care. I’m fine with Point 10.”
Indians don’t count. They were savages and had no civilization and had no means to resist white invaders. Also, the world was yet to be fully navigated and explored back then. Today, it’s different. Mankind has explored and mapped out and claimed every inch of territory. Also, the Age of Empire ended after WWII with non-whites telling whites to go home. So, we can have universal nationalism. Every part of the world has been CLAIMED by a particular people and culture. And this must be preserved and used as the fundamental principle for the world. After all, it’s called United NATIONS, not United Empire or United Economy.
This common sense view is called ‘far right’. The real extremist forces are the far-globalists, far-imperialists, far-Zionists, far-profiteers(greed is their only creed), far-thugs(black criminals and lunatics), far-sluts(what has become of womenfolk), far-invaders(neo-colonialism with massive third world movements). Why should peoples be invading and colonizing other nations when all the world has been claimed? Also, the agreement after WWII was end of empire and imperialism. So, why do we have ‘reverse-imperialism’ whereby non-whites get to demographically swamp white nations?
“11. The Alt Right understands that diversity + proximity = war.”
Derb: “Again, there are nits to be picked. Diversity per se is neither good nor bad. Numbers are of the essence. I’m a salt-in-the-stew diversitarian. I want to live in a society with a big fat racial and ethnic supermajority: somewhere north of ninety percent.”
True enough, but by ‘diversity’, Vox Day surely means diversity as cancer than condition.
Diversity as condition is a fact of any nation. Even the most homogeneous nations have some diversity, the presence of non-nationals and foreigners, some of whom are permanently settled. And those people can be tolerated as co-existing folks.
But by Diversity in today’s parlance, it means Diversity as a cancer. Diversity as condition is like a tattoo. Good or bad, that tattoo will not expand. Diversity as cancer or Diversinoma is like skin cancer that starts small but never stops growing. PC and globalism say this is the only kind of Diversity that is good and NECESSARY. This is obviously a fatal disease for any racial-cultural civilization, but this is pushed by globalist quacks as the cure. It’s like Barbara Specter saying that, “In order for Europe to survive, it must go into multicultural mode.” Huh? If Europe is swamped by non-Europeans, it is no longer Europe. But cunning witches like her work on the earnest and naive good-will of Nordics who are especially easy suckers since they’ve been raised on Holocaust Guilt and the notion that white homogeneity = Nazism.
“13. The Alt Right rejects international free trade and the free movement of peoples that free trade requires. The benefits of intranational free trade is not evidence for the benefits of international free trade.”
Derb: “I’m an economic ignoramus, but I’d like to see a good logical proof of the proposition that free trade requires free movement of peoples. I am sincerely open to being enlightened on this point.”
It depends on what one means by Free Trade. Surely, the Brits had free trade long ago but didn’t allow massive invasions of non-whites into Britain. Also, the leftist Scottish National Party is more pro-immigration. And Stalin moved plenty of people around in his empire.
Still, what Vox means by ‘free trade’ in the 21st century is globalism. This is different from free trade in the past that meant commerce among sovereign nations with national governments that represented their own peoples. Today, free trade is based on globalist corporations who feel NO sense of allegiance to their own nation or people. So, ‘free trade’ now means free movement of capital and peoples for economic opportunity, investment, exploitation, colonization. It is a form of anarchy.
Also, I think a kind of agreement has been made between rich and poor nations. It goes as follows. Rich nations can invest in poor nations, but just as First World industrialists gain access to Third World, Third World folks must have access to First World.. to work and toil and send remittances back home. It’s like US industrial elites gained access to Mexico, but US has to be opened to Mexicans who come in huge numbers and send back remittances.
“15. The Alt Right does not believe in the general supremacy of any race, nation, people, or sub-species. Every race, nation, people, and human sub-species has its own unique strengths and weaknesses”
Derb: “Hmm. That’s a bit kumbaya-ish (or “-oid”). No doubt the Bushmen of the Kalahari are much better at hunting with spears than are Norwegians or Japanese. What do the “unique strengths” of the Bushmen, or of Australia’s aborigines, avail them in the world we actually live in?”
Bushmen and Austro-Aborigines are outliers. They are few in number and don’t count. But when it comes to the major races, there are indeed advantages and disadvantages. While Japanese can make good gadgets and run an orderly society, they are short dorks and have no iconic value. So, even though they make all these electronic stuff, people prefer to see OTHER races on Japanese-made gadgets. Sony made a lot of TV and walkmans, and Japanese were good at making such stuff. But it was Negro athletes who were shown on TV. So, even though Negroes have little industrial value — they can’t run an economy — , they have much entertainment value, and that means billions around the world will be watching Negro runners and footballers. Look at China. Over billion people and they’re addicted to NBA Negroes. And look at all the Blapanese. They are almost all the result of black fathers and Japanese mothers. If Japan that has so few Negroes is going this way, imagine what is happening to EU.
Sure, all those Negroes coming from Africa have little industrial value. They be jiving and messing things up. But blacks got more rhythm and funk and bigger dongs. And whites find black music, black muscle, and black meat very pleasurable and entertaining. So, blacks have superior hedonic value. As whites are addicted to Negropium, one can say blacks do have serious advantages over the white race. Derbyshire is a math-geek sort of person and judges worth by science and intellect. But most of humanity is pretty vulgar, trashy, and infantile. And they want fun, fun, fun. And since Negroes be flipping and jiving and humping more than others, Non-Negroes have come under the iconic-idolatrous power of the Negroids. Bongo, the power of Negroness, does have a decisive advantage in the modern world. Capitalism and West used to be about work ethic, virtue, and restraint. But with over-surplus of food, clothing, and production, the West no longer worries about enough-to-eat or essentials of survival. They care mostly about fun and pleasure. Vice industry has overtaken virtue industry. In PLACES IN THE SUN, the Negroes were willing to pick cotton for corn meal. But today, Negresses got fat asses from welfare and ‘twerk’ their fat asses as if having sex with bad boys, and white kids grow up to this music and dance as ‘western values’.
Warsaw is probably not too adorable (so is the current government). These two sectors are only leftovers of what communists in our country. Actually, I’m quite surprised that Warsaw looks even decent. It had to be extremely difficult to rebuild it despite corrupted post-comunist shields successfully blocking any kind of progress. Everyone who might be intrested what is the cause of that I send to pictures from 1945 where 70% of city was a rubble. I’m not saying this as an excuse but as an underlying cause of what happened afterwards under soviet occupation. Steps forward were possible and made after 1989-1990 when we retrieved complete independence.
When people in charge still deal Polish interests between each other it’s double as difficult to make any change.
But majority of the youth thinks reasonably, critically analyzing situation happening in the world. We’re not blind and therefore we’re proud to think of Poles as of people with the same tradition, religion and roots. I believe that there is a place for acceptance for foreigners but only on our rules and with our allowance.
We are not taking immigrants to Poland because they don’t match any of our criteria.
Everyone who is making fun of Poland being hermetically closed for foreigners might be drastically surprised in a very close future when the bomb will go off on his street or a truck will drive over his best mate. Who knows, maybe just because we remained us for so long, we might be in a favorable position in combating an evil that I am afraid we’re directed at.
I’m glad to join any type of discussion.
Girls in Poland dress like German girls. Ugly, ugly, ugly clothes and plain Lutheran inspired style. That is now. 10 years ago I worked in Southern Poland and it was different. Also Poles are getting fat. In Gdansk last summer I saw lots of fats rolling around the streets. DO NOT get your hopes up on Poland. It is an idiot nation in the service of the USA. Lithuania and the Baltics are far nicer places! Better looking girls. Less Western (meaning retarded). If Russia nukes the Poles they deserve it for being western puppets. Oh, and also I saw lots of half breed mulatto children in Gdansk. Seems Polish whores go to London and get pregnant by nigs and bring the babies home to grandma to raise.
Poland is VERY disappointing for us and our cause.
Poland is now where Britain and France were in 1965, They were mostly white but because they had become US puppets their politics, culture and sense of ethnic nationhood were already being dismantled. So Poland in 2049 will probably be 30% or so non white, it will probably have elected a Muslim or black to win diversity points, and it will probably have an aging white population with an approaching majority non white youth demographic. And this is the fault of the Poles themselves, they are so obsessed about past historical issues that they will be completely unaware just how deadly becoming a US puppet is for a nation.
Curious question Vincent, my understanding is that Americans tend to be glued to the TV, whereas Europeans are said to hardly ever have a TV in their home. How popular is TV viewership in Poland?
Great article. Fight Poland, fight.
Diversity Is Destroying The Cohesion And Social Capital Of Western Nations
Conservatives exist to conserve the integrity of the left’s flanks as they destroy nations
A 1944 article published by the SS on the dangers of Americanism and (((where))) it comes from:
We need to destabilize the decadent Western consensus as fast as possible. Not just for ourselves, but for all these slowly falling nations.
So Poland lets foreign communists move into the country to sticker up their cities while they simultaneously ban Richard Spencer for racism? Poland’s “conservatives” are definitely better than America’s in that they don’t seem to be openly traitorous, but they need to stop fulfilling the dumb Pole stereotype.
It is part of nature to fear and dislike the different. But there is another nature that longs for the different.
Dogs and humans for instance. Dogs feel closer to humans than to other dogs. Dogs revere humans as superior. And many people have higher opinion of dogs than for humans. Dogs are seen as loyal and loving.
Even among humans, there could be preference for the Other if the Other is seen as more just, more able, more fair, more attractive. Taiwanese are Chinese but they prefer American hegemony over the Pacific because they see fellow Chinese in the mainland as yellow barbarians.
Many Zimbabweans wish for return of white rule because Mugabugabe and his black tribal thugs have been so vile.
Most Arabs would rather go live in Germany than deal with their haggly-waggly kind.
And some whites wax romantic about the Other as wiser or more spiritual or ‘cooler’. People tend to undervalue & take for granted what they got and overvalue & obsess about what others got.
Many non-whites are drawn to white nations because they see whites as superior in every way. These non-whites get little or no justice from fellow non-whites who are superstitious, corrupt, brutal, and clannish. So, they want to go to America(or Canada or Australia) and live under white rule. Also, they find whites to be sexually more attractive.
This may seem counter-intuitive because non-whites scream about ‘white racism’ and ‘white guilt’. One might think, “If they hate whites so much, why do they want to run from their own kind and live in white nations?”
But it is precisely because they prefer whites and want to live in white nations that they use PC to lower white defenses against non-white immigration/colonization.
And in a way, whites who welcome mass-colonization from Third World are practicing a kind of soft subconscious supremacism. They feel, “You darkies wanna leave your own inferior nations and cultures because you know that the white world and white people are better. You want to live in our superior world because you are incapable of creating anything so good in your own world.”
Most non-white ‘immigrants’ are closet-white-supremacists. They want to run away from their own kind, own nations, and own cultures to start new lives and take on new identities under white rule. They prefer white nations(esp those created by Northern Europeans) to their own kind with long history and culture. Chinese, Hindus, and Arabs have long deep history, culture, and identity going back 1000s of years, but they are willing to give that all up just to have a chance to live with whites, have sex with whites, work for whites, and take o white names like ‘Heather’ and ‘Robert’.