Perspective

The Brexit Betrayal

Submitted by Reactionary Edward

With the British political scene focusing on Brexit over the last 18 months, it has felt like there has been a never-ending tide of Punch and Judy style mudslinging. Of course, all the talk in the mainstream parties has been about ‘muh free trade’ and ‘muh worker rights’, with the obvious problem of immigration swept under the carpet.

But even in the nationalist scene, I fear many people, some of whom are very red pilled, are completely missing the bigger picture when it comes to Brexit and its consequences.

Yes, freeing ourselves from the tyrannical far-left courts in Brussels is a welcome relief. The freedom to rid ourselves from the ridiculous legislation is also good news, as is the return of our own fishing waters.

However, for our wider movement, there is an ironic consequence of Brexit which could make the fortunes of Britain and its White population worse off. The mass migration of White eastern Europeans has indeed driven down wages and put pressure on the white working class, they now find it much harder to find a job in the low skilled sector. But this same migration has also helped to keep the White population up above 85%.

Pro-Brexit leaders like Nigel Farage and Daniel Hannan have hinted that after free movement from Europe is stopped, they want to open the doors to the world, and they don’t just mean in terms of trade. Politicians like these two seem to be very enthusiastic in promoting immigration from the former Colonies of the British Empire like India. The reason for this is that they believe, quite stupidly, that Britain has more in common with its former third world Colonies than the White countries of eastern Europe.

Now when considering Britain’s current demographics, Farage and Hannan’s ideas seem near suicidal. Between 2001 and 2011, Britain’s white population grew by 1.70%, growing from 54,153,898 to 55,073,552. Yet their share of the population fell from 92.12% to 87.17%. Without the hundreds of thousands of eastern Europeans who had settled in the country during that period, the white population would be a lot lower.

If you consider over the next thirteen years that White immigration from eastern Europe will end, but third world immigration will continue and possibly increase, you can understand how rapidly the situation could deteriorate by 2030. Indeed, the only factor currently stopping London having a non-White majority is Slavic immigration. The White British population of London is 45%, yet the eastern European immigrant community pushes the overall white percentage up to 53%. Of course, this figure is still terrible, but not as bad as it could be.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m no fan of mass migration, whether it is from White countries or non-white countries. The mass movement of people has always had negative effects and has always disproportionately impacted the working class. However, I am slightly perplexed by the hatred shown towards eastern European immigrants by normie-white British people, who also seem to show a rather laissez-faire attitude to their non-white neighbors.

I guess they simply are the clearest example yet of why civic nationalism is such a joke.

It would be ironic then, that if by freeing themselves from the European Union, British nationalists may actually succeed in making their own people’s demographic situation worse.

Of course in an ideal world, there would be no non-White immigration, and immigration from other White countries would only be allowed within a framework that made sense. But we do not live in that ideal world, at least not yet, and so we must choose our battles wisely. So if that means going against decades old nationalist policies which were perceived as correct, but in the current climate may spell doom for our people, then so be it.

We will not keep making the same mistakes.

Sources for data: UK Census 2001, UK Census 2011, available at the Office for National Statistics.

 

Guest Writer
the authorGuest Writer

25 Comments

  • What a load of crap pure and simple. This idea that being white Anglo second is something better than anything else. Those sorts of twisted scared little Englander belong in the bar dad colonial days. When has the UK ever been’pure’? The UK has had immigration of one sorry or another for the last two thousand years at least what is pure English or even UK? Does that include the Normans? Or the Vikings? Or the angles? Or the Romans?

    What makes the UK great and has done throughout its history is it’s ability to receive people’s from all over the world to assimilate then into what is English or British and come out the other side a better more complete Britain.

  • Riopel: I gather, from your writings, that you the Poles, the French and the British. Tell me, is there any people you do like?

  • As long the country is in debt , jews and bankers won’t leave the UK because there is an interest to be made!

  • Only economics will determine the success of Brexit and who shall enter the UK or leave it. No matter what happens the dangers of a slow down in the economy are already showing. The debt load is on the raise as the public sector, education and health sectors are showing the strains, of lack of fundings and stress due to the increase in certain parts of the UK. I know some Brits who live outside the Uk but within the EU and they will return to the Uk if there is no agreement with Brussels. So there might be a balance in population, incoming and outgoing of emigrants.
    As for 3 world sources, depends the jobs available once Parliament re-introduces a new immigration legislation, as the jobs will definitely will be in highly skilled fields and not the service industries where most of the recent immigrants seeked work in the last 10 years, thus depressing those wages in which native born Brits worked!

  • Just a heads up, in case anyone missed it, we actually have a world government. As of 1917. For somewhere like america, you have state politics, and someone from that state to (in theory) represent their interests in the senate. You then also have a president. The world senate is called ‘the united nations’ or simply the UN. Its president today according to google is Peter Thomson.

    They disagree on every thing and appear in the media as useless. That is smoke and mirrors. The only things they all agree on are the ‘to be achieved by’ Agendas, agenda 21 (the infamous world scaled genocide plan) and 2030. Together they are known as “UN sustainability development goals (SDG)’, and are applied nationally, in the countries relative languages a version of ‘Sustainability Transformation Plans (STP)’, ‘local agenda 21’, ‘local business partnerships’, ‘local 2030’, ‘sustainability’, etc through our own government.

    Considering the amount of support and where that support extends their influence, I think you too will agree, useless is not what they are. If you use some of key words and your area you will probably find them there too. ‘charity sustainable’ nets a fair few.

    But not just there. In the UK and America, and the commonwealth countries, we have ‘The Fabian Society’, a gradualisitic marxist socialist ‘social engineering’ group. They have existed since 1880. The UN was their project in 1917, and they succeeded. They also seem linked to the first, ‘Pan-European Union’ movement, also 1917. That was headed by Codenhoven-Kalergi. The same one who is famous for the Kalergi Plan. He was supported by both Albert Einstein and Winston Churchill. Kalergi planned a mass migration from other lands into europe, to breed out and destroy (aka genocide) the white people and their culture. In his words he want “a mongrel people” to live in europe instead. This is reflected in article 29 of the UN SDGs.

    Not just Fabians, either. Next up we have the billionaire foundations, such as, Rockefeller, Rothschilds, Cadbury, Rowntree, etc. They create ‘societies’, ‘foundation’ and other oddly named ‘third sector’ charities, often for ‘diversity’, ‘sustainability’, ‘feminism’, ‘resilience’, ‘leadership’ (special note, “common purpose” and their ‘cultural intelligence’ NLP stuff, its weird and real good at being evil.), ‘smart cities’ . These in turn hire people that are literally, social engineers. They create artilcles in the media, they create the weird studies that are given to government after corrupt officials support biased or dodgy agendas in our houses of power. They also hire ‘change agents’ (that is what they are hired as, that is what they call themselves), they have a weird sub-culture about ‘leadership’, about manipulating people against us, basically. They all support ‘sustainability’.

    Next up just for laughs, groups like MSF (medicine sans frontiers aka doctors without borders) and I think red cross(?) have direct involvements in trafficking migrants into Italy.
    Utilities are being forced to force upon us things like “smart meters”, that independent testing reveals is very dangerous to us.

    The UN also has it’s own army, its a mix up of all ours. They call them ‘peacekeepers’. But have been known to step back and permit civilians to be slaughtered.
    The UN also has its own bank. The IMF International Monetary Fund.

    sidenote also people like soros, who get more directly involved at times, like crashing currencies. Funding charities. Etc.

    Considering the wealth that is being poured into this, and dedication that is going into making this happen, from literally the worlds wealthiest families that directly funding this.
    Useless is one thing they are not.

    Also the point that they have essentially just convinced every one that ‘depopulation’ needs to happen (aka genocide), and then gotten them help to create a ‘sustainable population’ in a ‘sustainable city’ (article 11 UN SDGs), so much so, that some of us work for them as ‘change agents’, or other functions. I think they intend something much worse, but are conniving enough to trick some people (mostly, like university students, and politicians, keeps it off the public radar that way) into agreeing to it and helping them create something much worse.

    Something like the Georgian Guidestones. Which reads quite a bit like UN SDGs philosphical BS. Except they explicitly state that ‘keep the population of world below 500,000,000’. Which is a tiny fraction of the number alive now.

  • i don’t understand why the valve would be closed for european immigrants but kept open for african and asian. were brexit to be fully realized, wouldn’t all prospective immigrants be funneled through the same channel? or is it that eastern europeans would be less inclined to move to britain while browns would still be as eager as ever? the article is not totally clear on the why’s.

  • A good article with some decent arguments. The central point is sound: Brexit is all well and good, but the real issue is demographic replacement. And the tunnel vision that many on the right have developed is certainly frustrating.

    However, I feel the article neglects a rather important point. British people have for a long time been against mass immigration, frequently listing it at or near the top of their concerns. Brexit was in large measure a reaction to that, and everyone realizes and admits this. The vote is likely to cause political parties to change their immigration policies and, crucially, to actually act to reduce immigration, for they have seen that people have had enough and are prepared to break things over the issue. And Brexit will, despite what some folk want you to believe, certainly break things, at least in the short term.

    What we on the alt-right need to do, in my opinion, is to make Brexit principally about immigration, to keep hammering away at the issue, to make it clear that we Brexit voters can only be satisfied with a massive reduction in the numbers coming in, preferably to zero. We have already shifted the overton window on this quite a bit, and now is the time to press home our advantage.

    I’d love to meme into a reality a sort of grand bargain, whereby we would agree to keep an open border with the EU in exchange for a complete halt to third-world immigration. Of course there’s no one in a position to strike such a bargain, but a girl can dream!

  • Oh bugger! Spelt my name wrong on the comment. Not a good start!

    By the way, what happened to the old comment board?

  • A good article with some decent arguments. The central point is sound: Brexit is all well and good, but the real issue is demographic replacement. And the tunnel vision that many on the right have developed is certainly frustrating.

    However, I feel the article neglects a rather important point. British people have for a long time been against mass immigration, frequently listing it at or near the top of their concerns. Brexit was in large measure a reaction to that, and everyone realizes and admits this. The vote is likely to cause political parties to change their immigration policies and, crucially, to actually act to reduce immigration, for they have seen that people have had enough and are prepared to break things over the issue. And Brexit will, despite what some folk want you to believe, certainly break things, at least in the short term.

    What we on the alt-right need to do, in my opinion, is to make Brexit principally about immigration, to keep hammering away at the issue, to make it clear that we Brexit voters can only be satisfied with a massive reduction in the numbers coming in, preferably to zero. We have already shifted the overton window on this quite a bit, and now is the time to press home our advantage.

    I’d love to meme into a reality a sort of grand bargain, whereby we would agree to keep an open border with the EU in exchange for a complete halt to third-world immigration. Of course there’s no one in a position to strike such a bargain, but a girl can dream!

  • I’ve liked all of the Polish people I’ve met, but the economic immigrants are generally of the lowest order so I can see why they would be resented by the local British. Hopefully Poland will continue growing economically so they can stand on their own feet.

  • I live in the U.S. so I really can’t weigh in on the economic part of eastern Europe immigration. However, in the grand sceme of things I feel that white immigration, though may take a toll on the economy in short term, in the long term it’ll have to get better. Whites hiring Whites, educating Whites, going into & doing business with Whites is a realistic outcome. The more Whites the less room for nonwhites. The nicer & safer the country as a whole. However, I also feel one must try to better their own country before leaving. Considering the reality of Europe right now, you need all the White race you can get. I feel the same for my country. I wish more Europeans & South Africans would move here.

  • I agree white immigration from eastern Europe is much less destructive than niggers from Africa. But it’s still destructive and majority of those people will need to go back just the same. It’s exactly as author states: no non-white immigration, very little white immigration

  • I once mentioned this very problem to a well known conservative patriotic group in this country, and wrote about it on their social media page before the elections took place. I was duly rounded up on and told to shut up because it was “spoiling Brexit” from happening. The problem still stands, as the article here explains.

    This is what you get when your nation and the majority of ‘fringe’ establishment mechanisms are too frightened to explicitly state what the problems and fears are about immigration and demographics. It is not just about money, housing, asylum seeking, wages.

    Until it is explicitly stated that we want to remain a majority white country, and worked on within that basis, both civic nationalists, believers in ‘secret nationalist’ (sigh) organisations, and the establishment organs will continue to have no problem and no desire to stop this country turning into a cross between Africa and the Middle East.

  • Riopel……”The British are such an awful, shitty people who’ve backstabbed virtually every European nation in some way that I’m not even sure if I care if the country gets saved or not…..”

    You really should learn to distinguish between what average ordinary British people are and what they do, and what the British government and their network of allies do in the British people’s name. I loathe what America has done and continues to do around the world, but I can manage to separate off the establishment and globalists, etc, from that of our racial allies and the general American public.

  • The British are such an awful, shitty people who’ve backstabbed virtually every European nation in some way that I’m not even sure if I care if the country gets saved or not.

  • British will hate on everyone not British but still accept mudslims, jamacians, and hindus as British. British has become like American and no longer associated with blood and soil, but culture; a proposition nation.

    Also Britain has the most mulatto children of any nation I have ever seen so don’t trust those stats about White British.

  • Every people that has tried to secure their nation with mercenaries have come to a bad end. The article makes an autistic numbers game argument, without understanding identity and nation.

  • BREXIT illustrates how fatal it can be to allow the energies of your movement to be directed into another, marginally related movement

    Limeys needed anti-immigration, anti-PC real-talk to stave off the current situation where… you will be jailed for opposing immigration

    Instead they got Brexit

    If someone tries to do the same in this country, don’t let them. Oppose them, bigly.

  • Mr. Guest writer, this was what Nigel Farage and the “soft-Trump” part-Jew, part-Turk Boris Johnson specifically promised when talking about Brexit, namey “no more Poles/Romanians/Lithuanians” and “more Pakistanis, Jamaicans, etc.”, as they always insisted it was about maintaining links with the Commonwealth countries. For some odd, abstract, metalphysical reasons, the “right” (which is overhwelmingly made out of people of rather limited intelligence) interpreted this the same way they interpreted Trump and still interpret Putin.

  • That’s why the official policy of the European altright should be to politically conquer the EU, not leave it. The EU’s Europe-wide reach and executive power and its contempt for toxic democracy are perfect tools for proponents of an ethnostate. An altright EU could clean up and unite all of Europe and amass enough resources to challenge the liberal American empire, because let’s face it there’s no way whites in the US are getting out of their death spiral which means the world’s only superpower is going to be controlled by negroes, spics and jews until it falls. Europe as a whole is in much better shape demographically.

  • British Patriotards are the biggest cucks alive. While I don’t like Eastern Europeans moving to the West since it harms Eastern Europe more than anyone else, the British normies also despise them with a passion while wanting to “unite the anglosphere” which basically means India and more browns coming to Europe. Well I say Godspeed in this glorious plan! The faster the Eternal Anglo falls the better it is for Europe.

Leave a Reply to mihilus Cancel reply