Simply Existing Is A Threat

We should always remember journalism is a tactic, not a profession. As such, it’s not surprising that the far-left activists who call themselves journalists blamed the Alt Right for the violence in Charlottesville. But they are lying. And they know they are lying.

When the Alt-Right marched into Charlottesville, they applauded the police. “Blue Lives Matter” was the chant. After all, the demonstrators had the law on their side. They had a permit, had coordinated with law enforcement before the event to avoid any trouble, and simply wanted to peacefully air their views. If the rule of law meant anything, if the Constitution was still in existence in any real sense, the police would safeguard the Unite The Right demonstration.

A few moments later, the police attempted to have the demonstrators killed. The police deliberately drove the demonstrators into the massed ranks of Antifa, who screamed obscenities and attacked, all while the post-Christian clergy who had helped organize the demonstrations smiled beatifically at the blood being shed in the name of “love.” The Antifa, for their part, chanted “f*ck the police” at their de facto allies in blue.

When Alt Right demonstrators defended themselves, they were given draconian charges, while the leftists were given a slap on the wrist. The national media seems curiously uninterested in who gave the order to unleash chaos. Instead, they blamed Unite The Right for the violence.

Antifa was also quite open about their hatred for Whites as such. “We will replace you!” was their cry in Charlottesville. At American Renaissance conferences, attendees celebrate the firebombing of Dresdenas do members of the “anti-German movement” in Germany. A professor who appeared on television to defend Antifa openly wishes for the deaths of his own students who are police officers. The media can’t decide whether ‘’White genocide” is an Alt Right conspiracy theory or a positive social good that must be pursued by any means necessary.

We should always remember journalism is a tactic, not a profession. As such, it’s not surprising that the far-left activists who call themselves journalists blamed the Alt-Right for the violence in Charlottesville. But they are lying. And they know they are lying. Because it wasn’t the Alt-Right who was attacking reporters in the streets, it was Antifa. Including, of course, the very reporters who had been accompanying Alt Right personalities to try to write their hit pieces.

Because of Donald Trump’s criticism of “fake news” and the “lying media,” reporters have begun carefully preparing the Narrative that any action against journalists will be the president’s fault. CNN hyperventilated about Trump retweeting a .gif from the WWE as an endorsement of violence. The truly unhinged Hillary Clinton even suggested President Trump (like Putin!) might already have ordered the murder of reporters.

Of course, Antifa has already been attacking journalists. Unlike those “hate crimes” that supposedly swept the country after President Trump was elected, some of these assaults were captured on video. Assaults on journalists by Antifa are habitual. Yet this doesn’t prevent the far-left paramilitaries from consistently receiving adoring coverage from the very liberals who are promised “the bullet” by Antifa.

One of the most ridiculous talking points we are seeing from the reporters eager for clickbait is the idea that they are “infiltrating” the Alt-Right. Sometimes, this “infiltration” does not seem to be even happening in real life. A black guy (a “poet” and “actor” apparently) spends time on Alt Right websites and the media treats him like he is James Bond infiltrating some underground SPECTRE base. Reporters interview Alt Right activists and they act like they are putting their life on the line. Even the so-called “string” that “Hope Not Hate” has been promoting with a great deal of fanfare only involved one act of violence, when the ridiculous “secret agent” got maced by Antifa.

This is why it is only a limited victory when conservatives say the Antifa and Alt-Right are “equally bad.” While it counts as progress that conservatives are beginning to recognize the threat of Antifa, it’s simply an obvious declaration of the fact that when there is no Antifa, there is no violence. At the Free Speech rally held only a few weeks before in Washington D.C., the opposition had their say not far away from our gathering. The more hardcore Antifa took the opportunity to protest the police. Not surprisingly, there was no violence.

Yet we are continuously told it is the Alt-Right, by its very presence, that is somehow a threat. By existing, we create the potential for violence. Violence by other groups is blanked out, simply written out of existence, even if it is a direct threat:

  • Just hours after a Christian church was attacked by a Sudanese “refugee” in Tennessee, explicitly on racial grounds, the Southern Baptist Convention was moaning that the obstacle to a “well-ordered, peaceful society” is not the deliberate importation of millions of people who hate white Christians, but the “evil” Alt-Right. These shepherds are not only hostile to any attempt to safeguard their beleaguered flock, they seem to positively delight in the opportunity to introduce wolves into their midst.
  • Congressman Steve Scalise was seriously wounded in an attempted massacre of Republican congressmen by a deranged Democratic activist. This crime seems to have had no impact on the unhinged media coverage of President Trump and the Republican majority, as the accusations of “treason” and demands for “resistance” are just as virulent as ever. What’s more, it seems to have had no impact on the Republican Congress itself, that found the time to push through a Joint Resolution condemning “white nationalism,” and not mentioning Antifa. (It’s worth noting that a man who quite explicitly supported literal black nationalism – carving out a black ethnostate from American territory – is now vice-chair of the Democrat Party. No black congressmen have disavowed; indeed some still seem to support it.
  • In Charlottesville, the fatality blamed on the Alt-Right, Heather Heyer, occurred under chaotic circumstances created by the police. Indeed, it’s hard to see how charges of “murder” will ever be sustained, as Heyer’s death appears to have been caused by a heart attack. This incident is being used to justify a sweeping crackdown on free speech. In contrast, the murder of five police officers in Dallas by a Black Lives Matter supporter, an attack widely celebrated by black activists, was not used against the movement. It did not slow the movement down nor seriously handicap the drive to force people to pay at least lip service to BLM. And a statue of Robert E. Lee was recently removed from the city – somehow, killing one person as part of the effort.

To even speak of the “Free World” is a sick joke – if we are asked to die in a war against Russia, it would be the greatest crime in history. Even the Daily Caller admits, “Eastern Bloc social life under communism was considerably freer than contemporary American life is for the middle and upper middle classes.”

And America is still far better than Western Europe, where the current governments are far more illegitimate and tyrannical than anything found in East Germany. Say what you will about the gruesome Erich Honecker, but I can’t imagine he’d let Muslims gang rape the daughters of entire cities and then arrest those who protest it, as does the “conservative” Theresa May.

Such repression is necessary for this system to limp on. The “normie” is, as we all know, essentially a lemming, looking for permission to believe or say certain things. But we shouldn’t be too dismissive of the average person. It’s common to find that many people support “far right” views, but their willingness to declare their support declines once they find who is actually associated with such views.

This suggests that most people are essentially as “right wing” as they are “allowed” to be. This is also why the Left and its media allies are so dedicated to making sure unacceptable people are denied a platform, and why they are so enraged at people who “normalize” or “enable” figures such as President Trump. What is the “far right?” Militant common sense. As Antifa implicitly admit with their tactics and the reporters explicitly argue with their demands for censorship and deplatforming, once we reach a certain level of support, we can’t be stopped.

The demonstration in Charlottesville is a typical example. For the specific issue in question, the majority of people supported the Unite The Right demonstrators. A solid majority of Americans want to preserve Confederate memorials. Incidentally, far more blacks support preserving Confederate memorials than will vote for the likes of Mitt Romney. And yet, this huge grouping of people is all but unrepresented in the political class.

Support for the true right is always far greater than polls or electoral results suggests. If someone says, “He tells it like it is” one instantly thinks of a right-wing populist. Everyone, from the Alt-Right to the Media Left knows this is a supervised society, a de facto occupation. The existing System only functions if opinions, symbols, and arguments are carefully policed and managed. And there is no scenario where the Alt-Right can exist “peacefully” in the existing framework.

Implicit in the theory of “White privilege” is the premise that there can be no bad ending for White people. Whites can never be genocided, conquered or oppressed, and indeed, never have been. Whites are a uniquely evil race of conquers and exploiters. As we are endlessly told, racism means “structural power” that apparently Whites have and no one else does. Needless to say, it’s awfully convenient for those who govern our lives if we actually believe this.

There’s nothing particularly new or innovative about those in power pushing an ideology that justifies their existence. Nor is there anything original about justifying it because the existing social order is ostensibly what’s best for the “poor” and the “oppressed.”

A ruling class remains a ruling class even when it denies it is in power. Power is often best exercised when it is concealed. But there’s no reason for us to take to take these claims seriously or pretend our rulers are arguing in good faith.

The reporters, professors, and intellectuals who posture as rebels against the establishment are nothing more than the priests and propagandists of the existing civic religion. The Alt Right is a culture of radical critique and deconstruction turned against those who control Western nations. That is precisely why they want – and need – to shut us down.

Blacks defying the symbols of the nation, rioting, or even murdering police officers are not a threat, as no one seriously believes they are capable of independent political organization. (Even Malcolm X was just a client of the liberal activist groups by the end, not to mention a literal cuckold.) Islamic terrorist attacks are just “part and parcel” of living in a big city. But a flyer on a college campus that promotes White identity is an existential threat and must be crushed.

The reporters who spearhead this effort at repression understand this. They can’t possibly believe their own propaganda about how violent and dangerous we are – they are far too eager to spy on us, attack us, hang around us, infiltrate us, interview us, and explain us, knowing all the while they are in almost no risk of physical harm. The Antifa they are so eager to lionize is far more likely to attack them. Yet in a deeper way, the Antifa is no threat to journalists. They are, after all, simply the militant wing of their System.

We, simply by our existence, create the possibility of a new way of being, a threat to their entire worldview and the System that gives them status and identity. That is what truly terrifies them. Some Antifa thug might smash their face in. But just by existing, we threaten to deconstruct them

Gregory Hood
the authorGregory Hood


  • “When I met Spencer in 2016 he claimed he was a globalist.” – Jorjani

    Jorjani calls Alt Right people “white trash.”

    Jorjani claims he was going to take over the Alt Right and turn us all into pro-Jew, pro-Persian globalists. Very bizarre that Spencer had anything to do with this guy.

  • Glad to see Gregory Hood is back. Hopefully, he’ll write more often about current events. I think he’s been away for almost one year.

  • @RS
    “that is all well and good….but when will the altright accept the fact that this is a battle of Capital vs White Labor? And that anti-white multiculturalism arose from the battle of Capital vs Labor? And that propaganda is the battlefield on which this war must be fought? And that this propaganda war must fought in minds of children….because that is where Capital began fighting this war DECADES ago….”
    Soon. The Alt-Right needs to focus more on power structures and resist the urge of the conservatives in our midst to go down the route of familiar culture warring which is mostly a sideshow for anyone not already wielding power. Given the modern Lefts roots in Marxism and their developments applying these ideas on the cultural front we wind up with the obvious right-wing dialectic about Cultural Marxism.

    What is less obvious is the reality of Cultural Marxism in having provided a greater insight into power structures for the Left, and study into how specifically the proletariat have been managed by their betters is being used. Rather than using this understanding to achieve their ostensible goal of liberation the Left has simply used their power to shuffle white people into the role of the proletariat. In the Cultural Marxist framework the white man is not configured as the bourgeoisie because in the Marxist framework the bourgeoisie are wielders of power, even if on others behalf as caste of mamluks. The proximate outcome of the Left spending generations studying the architecture of oppression has been perfecting and employing its’ tools which is reversing a real and observable ‘progress’ which was dependent upon the flourishing of white people.

    “…well, admittedly they had a permit but it had been revoked”
    The permit wasn’t revoked. The attempt to revoke the permit was overturned in court. Municipal governments do not have arbitrary power to determine who may assemble.

  • I agree it’s a waste of time trying to get the anti White Mainstream Media or Neo Conservative, Cuckservative media to honestly report on the Charlottesville VA demo or do a fair job of presenting our views. Might as well hope Zimbabwe President Robert Mugabe will be honest and fair promoting productive White farmers in his country.

    But, there are other ways to get our message, get our truth out.

    I have had very solid success contacting Republican Virginia State representatives and speaking with their staff about the Charlottesville VA demo/violence – state system oppression, Antifa etc.

    It’s a skill learning how to contact local, state and national representatives and speaking with their staff. I would be more than happy to educate others here and elsewhere in the Alt Right how to effectively contact, lobby our representatives and work with their staff to get our truth out bast the lying press, fake news media and their cuckservative stooges.

    We beat back ~ 8 mass illegal alien amnesties by effectively lobbying congress. But, too many of our people are lazy and just want to get drunk and rant and rave and despair that the “Whole System is corrupt”, “voting is worthless” etc.

    PM if you are interested in learning how to effectively lobby, influence state and local political reps in places like Virginia.

  • …well, admittedly they had a permit but it had been revoked, and the police forced the assembled alt-rightists to leave the town square because of that fact. The fact that the streets were full of counter-protesters, well that’s a fact of life.

    But in general I think this site has made it clear that to exist is tantamount to a crime, especially if one is a threat to society by nature, or even just perceived as such by society..

  • Heh, I am happy with all these developments which are described as bad. The only way to remove non-white threat permanently is to remove them. To exterminate them.

    It’s logical at it’s core but people are emotional creatures at it’s core and exterminating non-whites goes against our nature. When there is conflict between logic and instincts, instincts will prevail in majority of people.

    These developments lead exactly where they need to. Full assault on whites where they openly try to exterminate us. When time comes we will be able to do what needs to be done in self-defense and walk away with clean conscience.

  • The threat comes from both existing and demanding equality. As long as the Left discriminated against us like they have been, we will have the more high ground.

  • 1994………

    Without Words…….

    And still more SIGNATURE than anything in the Billboard 200 year after year……..

    White Souls Matter………

    And White Antifa??

    They’ve yet to Fully Digest their Cesspool Pseudo-Buddhist Fake Enlightenment……

    In TIME……


  • conservatives are beginning to recognize the threat of Antifa”
    but they are not a threat at all and though they say F da police, they wouldnt even show up if the thin blue line wasn’t there to protect them

  • Meanwhile for me it’s completely clear why
    (((their))) plan is, to destroy Germany first:
    They don’t see you even as an enemy, first
    we take Manhattan – than we take Berlin.

  • Didn’t you get the memo? We’re the embodiment of evil. We’re not human. It is perfectly acceptable to attack us for merely have an opinion which runs contrary to the mainstream. The belief that egalitarianism may not be the holy grail of ideologies is reason to make a person’s life hell.

    I can’t wait for victory.

  • I learned – strange enough – about my own
    culture only by patriotic Americans like you.

    God bless you and make you strong! To resist
    the evi,l we’re all getting to fall victim right now!

    Could tell ya stories from the center of madness!

  • On Diversity

    Not only is Diversity the chief cause of butchery and hatred but it is the RESULT of butchery and hatred.

    Diversity is the product of invasion, imperialism, enslavement, and domination.

    How did Ottoman Empire become diverse? Turks invaded and ruled over others and forcibly integrated them. Stalin did the same with huge population transfers in the USSR.

    Israel became diverse because of Zionist imperialism and mass colonization.

    Tibetans are pissed because of Han Chinese imperialism under the banner of ‘diversity’ and ‘inclusion’. Tibetans are forced to ‘include’ the People of Dog(meat).

    Latin American diversity resulted from Hispanic invasion, genocide, and slavery. And then Spanish and Portuguese brought over millions of black Africans.

    Since diversity resulted from butchery and hatred, it furthers butchery and hatred.

    Being wary of foreigners is a sound idea. Foreigners could be nice and well-meaning, but as often as not, they come with intentions to take over, replace, and to rule. Just ask the American Indians. I’ll bet they are sorry they gave corn to the starving Pilgrims.

    True, empire can unleash new possibilities, new ideas, new discoveries, and etc. Imperialism led to discovery of the whole world and much that is novel, exciting, and epic. And diversity can lead to creative friction and birth of revolutions. Christianity couldn’t have been possible without the friction of Roman Imperialists and Jews. And the clash of empires led to rise of new movements and civilizations, like the clash of warm front and cold front creates storms that produce rain to make plants grow. But there’s always been a huge cost to diversity, or excessive amounts of it. And clash of civilizations also wiped out entire peoples and cultures. It’s like powerful storms can wipe out entire communities.

    Also, we should make a distinction between organic diversity and imposed(often incompatible)diversity.

    A society will always have children, young people, adults, and old people. That is organic diversity. Everyone goes from infancy to old age. Also, even a homogeneous society will have smart people, average people, and dumb people. And it will have strong people, normal people, and weaklings. That kind of diversity is intrinsic and part of ANY community. So, a community can be all German, all Black, or all Jewish, and it will have different kinds of people. At any rate, such differences of age, intelligence, and strength are ameliorated by the fact of racial or ethnic homogeneity. At the very least, despite the differences in age and ability, there is a sense of togetherness and mutuality because they have at least one thing in common: ethnos and shared history. So, a society can be all Japanese, and there will be smart ones, dumb ones, young ones, old ones, healthy ones, sick ones, and etc. Naturally, such diversity in age and ability leads to social divergence. And yet, the factor of shared Japanese ethnicity and history maintains a sense of unity and purpose.

    But even that is impossible in a society of Imposed Diversity or Extrinsic Diversity. Now, an extrinsically diverse society will still result in the formation of communities of shared ages or abilities. So, young people of all color may hang out. And smart people of various colors may work together. But age is not constant. Whereas a Jewish person is Jew from baby to old age, a young person is soon an adult than an old person. So, age cannot be an identity. That conceit was the profound delusion of the Boomers who thought they would be forever young with slogans like “Don’t trust anyone over 30”.

    As for ability, it only applies on the job. So, while a smart Hindu may identify as SMART at work with other smart people of different races, that identity(of ability) has little use away from work or particular ability that requires intellect. Also, even smart people can give birth to not-very-smart kids. And even smart people can fall in love with not-smart people. Smart women may fall for handsome but not bright men, and smart men may fall for pretty bimbos. So, ability alone doesn’t do it as a stable identity. Also, ability is unstable. A person of great brilliance may lose the muse… as with so many music composers. Or a strong person may become injured and no longer be strong. Look at helpless Burt Reynolds after breaking his leg in DELIVERANCE. Suddenly, he’s even more helpless than a child.
    In contrast, ethnicity is constant if tended and cared for. It is the ONE constant from childhood to oldhood. So, a Chinese person or Jewish person can be Chinese or Jewish from birth to death, and that gives deep meaning to his life. Also, ethnic identity is one thing that even poor people can pass down to their kids. A rich Hindu and a poor Hindu will bequeath different sums of wealth to their kids, but ethnic identity is priceless. It’s one area in which a rich Hindu is not richer than a poor Hindu. The Hindu-ness inherited by a poor Hindu child is no less valuable than the Hindu-ness inherited by a rich Hindu child.

    The problem with a Diverse Society that encourages excessive Race-Mixing is the identity of ethnicity is weakened, and identity becomes weak or unstable. Or overly narrow — the very smart club — or overly generic — like ALL young people. It’s no wonder that there’s been an explosion of bogus identities such as 50 genders. The death knell to racial and ethnic identity(esp among whites but also among Hispanics and East Asians) has led to a search for new identities based on hair color, holding up placards, wearing pussy costumes, or whatever.

    Now, it’s been said that a lot of affluent white people don’t care about other whites(who are less well off or facing hard times) because they have it so good. Since they got wealth, privilege, and comfort, why should they care? After all, they are not feeling the pain(not even the kind of pain that Bill Clinton pretended to feel in the early 90s; he was likely feeling something more physical and female).
    But surely, there are two kinds of pain. Physical and emotional. Even those in total physical comfort can feel great emotional pain IF he/she feels a connection to those who are suffering. This is true of animals as well. Even if some elephants are safe, they will feel emotional discomfort if one of their kind is suffering. So, elephants will try to save and help the one in distress. And this is true of chimps, dogs, and dolphins too. Even if they are safe and have plenty to eat, they will feel sad or worried if they sense pain or agony in their ‘friends’ or pack members.

    So, there is something wrong when well-off whites feel NO sadness or worry about whites who are either suffering or falling behind(esp due to policies pushed by rich whites). This wasn’t always so. When whites sensed other whites-in-pain in the past, they all rallied to help those whites. When they heard of the Alamo massacre, white folks all across America wanted to go aid Texans. When Americans heard of Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor that killed 1000s of white folks, they got roused up. But such feelings have been suppressed among whites under PC, and the elite-educated whites now act as though it’s beneath their dignity to care about other whites. If they must CARE, it’s always for the Top Three: Jews, Negroes, or Homos(though other groups may be included for political expediency, like the sudden libby-dib faux-compassion for Muslims when Trump got elected).

    But, the fact that a good number of well-off whites did vote for Trump or at least support a kind of nationalism shows that they are not simply about material or physical comfort. They do feel emotional pain, agony, and distress over the fact that so many Americans have fallen to the wayside. Maybe some of these people, though individually successful, have siblings or cousins whose lives have gone the wrong way(and there is no one to lead such people back to the fold; it’s like the estranged brother in MICHAEL CLAYTON). Now, this kind of white-on-white sympathy is frowned upon, even vilified, by PC. But some well-off whites do feel it. They understand that life isn’t just about individual material comfort but an emotional peace of mind. When so many of their own kind are falling behind, there is bound to be emotional discomfort among such people.

    Libertarians may only care about themselves as free individuals. So, if they are doing fine, that’s all that matters. They may scoff at altruistic feelings as ‘weak’ and ‘irrational’. Libertarianism is a cancer of Anglo individualism, like National Socialism was a cancer of Germanic communalism. Both individualism and communalism have genuine worth but only in relation to other -isms. Excessive individualism cuts one’s emotions from rest of humanity, even one’s own kind. And excessive communalism leads to conformism of the mind and tyranny.
    Unlike Anglos who led the way in the development of individualism, Germans were closer to blood-and-soil sense of an ethnic and cultural community. The positive side of this was a greater concern for the nation as a family. And this positive side was there in National Socialism as well as it emphasized the needs of every member of the German Volk. But it was pushed so far that it turned into a radical racist supremacism that disregarded the worth of OTHER nations and peoples. Too much Germanic or Aryan sense of brotherhood failed to regard other peoples as part of larger brotherhood of man.

    In contrast, the excessive libertarianism of Anglo-America has led to atomization and self-worship(esp by imitating trashy narcissistic celebrities). Some will say US is too proggy and ‘socialist’ with Big Government, but American Statism exists not to bolster a greater sense of American Community(as during the New Deal) but to facilitate more individualism. It serves as safety net for excessive behavior in a society where profits are privatized and losses are socialized. We see same mindset from Wall Street to Beat Street. Financial sharks gamble and then get bailouts. Negroes and ‘white trash’ act like louts in schools and personal lives and then rely on government for safety nets so they can go on acting like pigs. Same thing in UK with its statist-enabled Chav pigs and sows.

    It’s not fascist-socialism(the only one that will work) but welfare-socialism(that eventually degrades the soul). Fascist socialism is conditional. It’s a system that cares for everyone but also pushes everyone to do their part. New Deal was a form of liberal fascist socialism. It was about providing work and benefits for those who wanted to work and be responsible. In contrast, Great Society socialism(the American Great Leap Forward) was welfare-socialism predicated on rewarding those who were least responsible and civic-minded.
    Fascist socialism is asking everyone to lift 100 lbs. Many can lift that weight and some can lift more. But some can’t lift even that. But fascist-socialism ask them to try, and it’s this effort that matters. So, if someone tries his best and can only lift 50 lbs, the system lifts the other 50 lbs for him. It was aid to someone who did at least try. In contrast, welfare socialism is like lifting the full 100 lbs for someone who won’t even try to lift any amount of weight. This is degrading to the soul. In the past, blacks worked hard in this country and had dignity even with menial jobs. At least they tried. So, when these Negroes asked for more, it made some sense for America to be generous. But since Great Society, Negroes think the US exists to just give them any shi* they be demanding. It degraded their souls.

    Anglo individualism was a great idea, but it was meant to exist within the cultural context and community of Anglo culture and tradition. It was not supposed to be a deracinated globalized nothingness where only ME matters. Also, any such individualism — no matter how successful the individuals are — is bound to fail and lose to group actions of others. After all, no matter how rich a person, he is powerless against the unity or the mob. Unless some higher theme links him with OTHERS to form a united front, he can easily be taken down by others. It’s like even the strongest man will lose if 20 people decided to gang up on him as a group. He may be able to beat them up one-on-one but will lose if 20 attack him in coordination. It’s like wolves can bring down a moose or a bear because they work together.
    The trick is to have individualism within a community or to have a community with individuality. Failure of current Anglo-America is there is room for white individuals but no sense of white unity. Failure of National Socialism was the absence of individual independence from the communalized power of the radical state.

    Jews surely learned their lesson about the necessity of communal consciousness… though they’ve now taken it too far, as with National Socialists. It’s one thing to defend and serve Jewish identity and interests, but it is wrong for Jews to sacrifice the identities and interests of OTHERS so that ONLY Jewish identity and interests will be served. That is a form of supremacism with similarities to Nazi chauvinism. The fact that Jewish Globalists are willing to push a ‘new cold war’ with Russia, create yet more havoc in the Middle East — war with Iran next on the menu? — , and push destructive diversity on the West suggests too many Powerful Jews are willing to sacrifice any amount of gentile world to get what they want.

    Still, there is nothing wrong with Jews caring about other Jews. If anything, some Western European Jews were more into their own status among White Gentile elites than into caring about the fate of Eastern European Jews. But WWII, Shoah, and rise of Israel changed all that. There was a sense that it’s not enough for Jews to be physically safe and comfortable in one part of the world when other Jews in another part of the world could be oppressed or being killed. So, even though American Jews had it pretty good in the US, they felt emotional duress and pain about what was happening to European Jews. It’s this connection that makes life meaningful. It’s like the thief in KAGEMUSHA. At one time, he had no concern about anything but himself. But once he comes to feel a connection to the Takeda Clan, he feels emotionally sick to see it wiped out. Without such sense of connection, he would not have cared and would have just gone about looking for good times for himself.
    Or consider the scene in DISTANT THUNDER by Satyajit Ray. The man is served a plate of food, and he can have a nice meal, but he feels emotionally sick because his wife and others in his hometown are suffering from hunger. And it’s like TEN COMMANDMENTS. Moses in exile could have had a nice life with a wife and all, but God talked to him through a Burning Bush and told him he better care for Hebrews still in bondage in Egypt. So, it’s not enough that he’s safe and eating well and has a nice life. He has to care for his kind in Egypt under the iron rule of Yul Brynner. From that moment, Moses’ life is about bringing every last Hebrew out of Egypt because everyone matters(though, to be sure, he kills half of them later when they get funny with the Golden Calf, the homo parade of the day).

    Anyway, even well-off white folks can be politicized IF they are made to feel this racial, cultural, and historical connection with fellow Europeanites. Once that connection is rewired, even affluent whites who are physically comfortable will feel emotionally uncomfortable when they realize that so many whites are suffering or facing hard times.
    Also, it’s not just about love of fellow white folks but love of white European history and civilization. This is a great heritage and must be preserved, and only white folks can do it. (And even if it weren’t a great culture, it’s worth preserving because all peoples and heritages deserve to survive and be protected. Tajiks are not a great people who contributed much to humanity, but they have every right and responsibility to survive as people and culture in their own homeland.)
    White people must preserve white civilization. The idea of Another People taking over and preserving white heritage is a joke. For one thing, PC instills non-whites with hatred toward whites. But even if non-whites were made to appreciate white culture and pay it tribute, it wouldn’t be the same thing. It’s like white people can pretend to preserve American Indian culture, but only American Indians can genuinely preserve and guard their own heritage and culture. Non-Indians can study and appreciate Indian stuff, but it is NOT theirs to own and preserve. Elizabeth Warren is NOT a squaw. It’s just a joke. It’s like it’d be pretty stupid for a bunch of Mexican-Americans to take over a black community and pretend to be New Blacks who own and preserve Black American History and Heritage. That would just be ‘larping’.

    Anyway, any people who care for their own great culture and civilization should feel EMOTIONALLY SICK when such are being destroyed or replaced. It’s not just a matter of economics but sacred memory and appreciation.
    Just think. White people are supposed to feel angry and outraged if the Mona Lisa were destroyed. But they are not supposed to feel angry and outraged when the very race depicted in the painting are destroyed or replaced or mixed into mulatto-ness. Never mind that Mona Lisa exists only because the kind of people depicted in such paintings existed to be represented by an artist.

    Suppose there is a beautiful flower or animal that inspired a great painting. Now, imagine if people would be outraged if the painting is destroyed but NOT outraged if that species of flower or animal is destroyed. But the painting was possible only because such flower or animal existed(to be represented in art). Indeed, no matter how great the painting, it is still just a pale imitation of the real thing that is more important. It’s like one’s mother is more precious than a good painting of her. Creativity is precious, but Creation is priceless. The most beautiful painting of clouds is nothing compared to real clouds.

    Western art and culture are the product of and a representation of white people, but for some reason, we are told that the culture is worth preserving but NOT the people who made it possible. So, Greek sculptures are worth preserving but not the Greek people whose forms are depicted in the sculptures. It’s okay if Africans come to Greece, hump all the women, and turn every Greek into someone who looks like a Moroccan.

    And so many white people are okay with this because PC cut their connective cord to their own race and history. It’s like a paralyzed person with severed spinal cord who can’t feel sensations in the rest of the body. PC has cut the spinal cord between the white mind and white senses. White mind feels no pain when white senses are being destroyed.
    But once the white nervous system is reconnected, even the most comfortable and affluent white person will feel great pain, distress, and agony when he realizes what is being done to the civilization and culture of his folks.

  • Agree with the others, Greg Hood is one of the best writers out there.

    This article shows again that what actually happens at these events, what we actually say online, what we actually believe in are all irrelevant compared to who is conveying these things to the general public. When big Jew steps into be the informational middle man, everything you are and everything you say becomes “violent neo-Nazi White supremacist extremists say….do…converge on…,” whatever the story may be.

    No matter how obviously correct or reasonable or non-violent we are, it will be slammed as “hateful rhetoric,” while no amount of buffoonery or violence from negroids or Yiddishers will be condemned, and will indeed be celebrated as “progress,” “standing up to hate,” and what have you. It simply does not matter what the facts are, all the matters is who is telling it to the masses, whether it be the news hack, teacher, screenwriter, or otherwise.

  • They realize the difference between an immediate threat and an existential threat. Antifa, Muslims and blacks are only a threat to them if they are physically near them. White Nationalists would completely tear down every trace of the liberal media and most likely exile or execute every liberal journalist for aiding and abetting genocidal treason.

  • that is all well and good….but when will the altright accept the fact that this is a battle of Capital vs White Labor? And that anti-white multiculturalism arose from the battle of Capital vs Labor? And that propaganda is the battlefield on which this war must be fought? And that this propaganda war must fought in minds of children….because that is where Capital began fighting this war DECADES ago….

  • Great to see Greg Hood back. It’s interesting that while white nationalism is derided (even on alt-Right sites) as a pipe dream, on the level of calling for a return of the House of Windsor as American head of state, it is actually the subject of a Congressional resolution explicitly denouncing it. Greg’s right–the very existence of white people who think in racial terms is a serious threat to the existing cultural and political structure..

  • Anitfa are no longer a threat to far right orgs. Kyle Chapman & his proud boys (boys being the correct disruption) are now crashing rallies of the right & attacking our people. Either this guy is pissed the alt right dumped him after we found out he is married to a nonwhite or he was just looking for a reason to be violent.

  • So many people associated with ‘white nationalism’ or ‘white supremacism’ have been demoted, fired, or blacklisted. Even physically attacked. And the internet deplatforms entire sites devoted to White Identity and White Interests.

    We are told that this is constitutional since Freedom of Speech doesn’t apply to private companies. In other words, private companies can hire and fire whomever they want based on whatever.

    But I just don’t buy this line of argument.

    Just consider the following scenario. Suppose a company has a president who reads about Israeli treatment of Palestinians. Suppose he is appalled by Zionist behavior. Suppose he comes to see Zionism as a form of imperialism and supremacism. So, suppose he purges any worker who is associated with Zionism or support for Zionism.

    Would ACLU, ADL, SPLC, and American Jews just accept this as OKAY since private companies can hire or fire whomever they want?
    Now, the company didn’t fire anyone because he or she is Jewish. The company fired people, Jews or gentiles, who are known to have explicitly supported the project of Zionism. (After all, there are anti-Zionist Jews.) So, would the Establishment, Jews, and globalists be fine with this?

    Or suppose a company decides that BLM is a Hate Movement based on lies that promotes intimidation, violence, and thuggery. Suppose it decides to fire anyone, white or black or whatever color, who is associated with support of BLM and its agenda.
    Would ACLU, ADL, SPLC, and NAACP — and NYT and MSM — just accept it as the Right of private companies to hire or fire whomever as they please based on their own criteria of what is ‘acceptable’?

    I don’t think so. I’m sure all the ‘experts’ will find LEGAL reasons to oppose such company decisions. If anything, the powers-that-be will summon any means possible to see that company destroyed for practicing its constitutional rights.

    If Youtube were owned by Hindus, Chinese, or Arabs and went about deplatforming Zionist vloggers as ‘hateful’ or homo vloggers as spreading ‘degeneracy’, I highly doubt if Jews, globalists, and progs would defense the rights of private enterprise. After all, if progs care so much about Free Enterprise and Business Rights, why do they call for socialization of medicine?

    Or can you imagine Youtube hiring BDS to root out Zionist vloggers as hateful, supremacist, imperialist, or exclusionary? If anything, American Jews are using money and influence to pass laws that will criminalize speech and actions in favor of BDS.

    The Alt Right must push for laws that make it illegal to fire anyone for political or ideological views away from work. That is discrimination based on creed. If it’s wrong to fire someone for being pro-Zionist, it is wrong to fire him for being pro-Europeanist. All workers must follow professional codes AT WORK, but his private and personal beliefs or activities shouldn’t be grounds for dismissal from work. And this is the very case that the Progressives once made. They decried the firing of so many communists and leftist sympathizers during the ‘McCarthy Era’. But they’ve now shown their own face. It was never about principles but about protecting their own. If McCarthy had been a leftist who went after far-right people, I’m sure the Lib Narrative would remember him as a hero.

  • Greg, please write more often. You have consistently been the best writer on the alt-right in all aspects.

  • I think the black that assaulted a guy and got his ass kicked for it is now getting charged with a felony assault. Not sure about any of the other charges for people at Unite the Right

    The people are with us more than you’d think. Look at the civic nationalist flag site, Breitbart. Most of the comments wouldn’t be out of place here.

  • Wait until the time comes in which the radical communist leftist turn on the police and they are under massive attack by terrorists…

    Who will then help them? When we needed their help, they in turn, turned a blind eye to people who were assembled peacefully. But when the government purges the polices ranks there won’t be anyone there to support them

Leave a Reply