95 Theses Against The Anti-White Establishment: Part 1

Submitted by Martin Luther


Martin Luther nailed his 95 Theses to a church door in Wittenberg, Germany 500 years ago this month (October 2017). His 1517 broadside ignited the Reformation and triggered cultural upheavals whose effects endure to this day. In commemoration of Luther’s landmark action, is publishing in three parts a new 95 Theses attacking one of liberalism’s holiest of holies. These 95 Theses Against Affirmative Action are timely, not only because of Luther’s 500th but also because of the Trump administration’s ongoing investigation into affirmative action at universities and because of Michelle Obama’s recent anti-white-male comments at a women’s conference. Let the reformation begin.

  1. Society’s resources are finite, not infinite.
  2. For these 95 theses, society’s resources are admission to America’s top colleges/universities and good jobs.
  3. Degrees from top colleges and universities confer lifelong advantages in reputation, networking, and job opportunities.
  4. Good jobs pay higher salaries and valuable benefits.
  5. Good educations and good jobs, joined with smart hard work, largely enable the American dream: material comfort and security, good housing, medical care, retirement.
  6. Admission to America’s top colleges/universities is constrained by annual limits. Every year, available seats are finite, and a correspondingly limited number of freshmen enroll every fall.
  7. Good jobs in America’s companies, corporations, organizations—public and private, for-profit and non-profit, large and small—are finite. At every point in time, the size of a workforce and the number of positions is fixed. Each position employs one worker.
  8. If an economy or an organization is growing, let alone shrinking, every employed position still employs one worker. A single hire is made for a single position. At every point in time, the total number of good jobs is finite, not infinite.
  9. Anyone who claims that society’s resources are not finite is disingenuous, uninformed, or naive. The disingenuous, especially if apostles of affirmative action, know that society’s (their organization’s) resources are limited. They want the jobs and the college admission slots for themselves and their favorites.
  10. Because of the desirable advantages conferred by top educations and good jobs, people compete keenly for both.
  11. In competing for prime educations and jobs, people present their accomplishments, preparation, experience, performance, talents, abilities, and references to offices, committees, and individuals who make admissions and hiring decisions. All of these factors represent authentic and proper qualifications for admissions and hiring.
  12. Affirmative action privileges applicant sex and race in awarding university admission and jobs as indulgences. In dispensing its indulgences, affirmative action favors women and minorities over white males.
  13. Because affirmative action favors sex and race, women and minorities, estrogen and melanin, vaginas and dark skin in admissions and hiring, its biological criteria supersede authentic and proper qualifications in the keen competition for society’s resources.
  14. By favoring sex and race, estrogen and melanin, vaginas and dark skin as bases for college admission and employment, affirmative action mocks and subverts authentic and proper qualifications.
  15. Since the establishment of affirmative action in 1965 (LBJ’s executive order 11246), estrogen and melanin have widely become valuable job and admissions qualifications. They typically exceed accomplishments, preparation, experience, performance, talents, abilities, and references as determinative qualifications for college admission and employment through affirmative action.
  16. In different but equivalent terms, vaginal possession and dark skin, being female and/or a minority are winning qualifications for college admission and employment through affirmative action.
  17. Affirmative action practitioners in higher education and human resources strive vigorously to “diversify” their student bodies and workforces by raising estrogen and melanin levels to attain “inclusiveness.”
  18. Devotees of affirmative action float different rationales. Whatever the claim, the practice results everywhere in the same intended outcome: fewer white males in student bodies and workplaces.
  19. The arc of the moral universe is long and bends toward indeterminacy.
  20. Federal law (Title VII) prohibits discrimination in employment based on sex and race.
  21. The equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires federal and state laws to treat people equally. College and job applicants cannot be treated unequally because of sex or race with respect to laws prohibiting discrimination based on sex and race.
  22. Non-discrimination statements on admissions and job announcements and applications universally include language like “[This organization] does not discriminate based on sex and race.”
  23. Affirmative action statements on announcements and applications universally include language like “[This organization] is an equal opportunity / affirmative action employer. Women and minorities are encouraged to apply.” Or “[This organization] undertakes affirmative action to assure equal employment opportunity for minorities and women.” Or “[This organization] is committed to diversity. Women and minorities are encouraged to apply.”
  24. If admissions offices and employers do not (cannot legally) favor or discriminate against applicants based on sex and race, how can they “undertake affirmative action for women and minorities”?
  25. If admissions offices and employers do not (cannot legally) favor or discriminate against applicants based on sex and race, why do they specify women and minorities as desirable applicants? Why do they exclude white males from their invitations and “equal opportunity” statements?
  26. In the artful language and practice of affirmative action and “equal opportunity,” “encouraging women and minorities to apply” is legal. “Seeking women and minorities” is illegal. Linguistic and procedural subterfuge is evident. The necessary artifice to discriminate “legally” against white males is in place.
  27. Defenders of affirmative action are legal contortionists. They rationalize illegal discrimination based on sex and race by bending, twisting, warping rhetoric and public justification so they can self-approvingly practice sexism and racism. Their deception and dishonesty are, however, transparent.
  28. To define affirmative action more literally, votaries also call it “positive discrimination,” a term that openly announces and embraces discrimination as its tool. “Positive” for women and choice minorities, negative for white males and AA’s throw-away minorities.
  29. In the language and implementation of affirmative action and “equal opportunity,” minorities are narrowly defined. The four broadly favored groups are African-American, American Indian, Asian-American, and Hispanic American.
  30. The nuts-and-bolts implementation of affirmative action and “equal opportunity” requires narrow definitions to discriminate based on race. “African-American” is too general and inexact, since black Americans may come from 54 African and numerous West Indian countries. “Asian-American” is too general and inexact, since Asian-Americans may come from 48 Asian countries. “Hispanic American” is too general and inexact, since Hispanic Americans may come from 22 Spanish-speaking countries. The wide world of color is too big, diverse, and inclusive for affirmative action’s very specific biases.
  31. In practice, “African-American” means descended from American slaves, not immigrants from Africa or black people from the West Indies. “Asian-American” means people of Cambodian, Hmong, Laotian, or Vietnamese descent, not Chinese-, Indian-, Japanese-, Korean-, or Asian-Americans of other heritages. “Hispanic American” means of Mexican or Puerto Rican descent, not Cuban-, Guatemalan-, Nicaraguan-, Peruvian-, Spanish-, or Hispanic Americans of other heritages. Affirmative action’s specific categories of eligibility and acceptable ethnicity are internally prejudiced and exquisitely racist.
  32. Once exposed, the specificity of affirmative action’s racism is even more offensive and indefensible, beyond its discrimination against white males.
  33. When affirmative action apostles deny they have specific racial favorites, press them to reveal their internal working definitions, their selection process and goals, and their all-important racial tracking data, unredacted and aggregated over time. Require them to show, not tell.
  34. Affirmative action privileges women as women across the board for being women.
  35. Affirmative action’s jackpot is the African-American female. The ne plus ultra, the crème de la crème. AA’s Promised Land, its Holy Grail, Paradise Found. “Equal opportunity’s” darling, its heartthrob, equalest of all. Visibly the most qualified (female, black) by affirmative action’s biological qualifications (estrogen, melanin).
  36. By contrast, affirmative action’s devil incarnate is The White Male. Source of all evil, supreme oppressor, arch villain, prince of privilege, mortal enemy, monopolizer of oxygen and all space, the social justice warriorette’s bugaboo and worst nightmare.

Part two of 95 Theses Against Affirmative Action enumerates how white males self-defeatingly created affirmative action, how sexism and racism are affirmative action’s stock-in-trade, and how women and minorities will gladly displace white males, then demand even more. Stay tuned for theses 37-62.

Guest Writer
the authorGuest Writer


  • Lest we forget the other anniversary we have this month — soon after
    the 100th Anniversary of the Miracle of the Sun performed by the Mother
    of God in front of 70,000 people at precisely the exact time
    as announced in order to confirm the people who believed in their
    Catholic Faith and to prove to the unbelievers that her messages and
    secrets which she gave to the three children were true — the second
    anniversary is that of October 31, 2017 which will be the 500th
    anniversary of the “nailing of the 95 theses to the church doors at
    Wittenberg Cathedral” by Fr. Martin Luther.

    The reason that we have put up a picture of Luther’s toilet, fairly
    recently discovered in Wittenberg, is because of Luther’s own statements
    that he came up with his 95 theses while suffering from chronic
    constipation. It is also while resting on the facilities that he was
    enlightened by his revolutionary theological idea of “faith without
    works” according to which you cannot do anything to contribute to your
    own salvation, in fact, to strive for holiness is itself a grave sin.

    This is why we have called the anniversary the 500th year of “Potty Talk.” Below, I first post a video of Francis in which he says that the Catholic Church and Protestantism now
    teaches the same doctrine with regard to Justification — the prime
    point of contention with the Lutherans for 500 years. Along with
    Francis’s statements, I publish my own lecture on this anniversary and
    the special celebration had at the Vatican last year to “celebrate” ? the
    500 year anniversary of one of the greatest attacks against the
    Catholic Faith ever launched. Of course, the one officiating at the
    celebration has himself launched what must be the most
    devastating attack on the most basic rudiments of Catholic Faith and
    Morals ever appearing in the public sphere. In light of 500 years of
    Potty Talk, perhaps it is fitting that the statue Martin Luther,
    presiding at the Vatican on October 13 (sic), 2016 was BROWN. ?


  • Why can’t I post info about The Myth of American Meritocracy here? It has direct bearing on Whites facing discrimination on admission to top universities, and (((who))) is favored by it.

    • Someone could be flagging your comments as spam, or could have done so in the past and perhaps that triggered this. Having read your comments for a couple weeks I think that is the most likely explanation, current or previous flagging by other posters, someone with an axe to grind. Also, in answer to your question from another thread the purpose of getting a cadre of pro-White people to pal around on social media is to increase the visibility of our posts, make them highest rated in threads on mainstream sites so that we project pro-White commentary more effectively.

      On smaller sites with less reach it’s done out of habit or a desire to reciprocate/elicit thumbs ups elsewhere probably. I’ve thumbed up comments in a foreign language without translating them before, and still do sometimes. It only works though when everyone is good about reciprocating, and only works when everyone is steadfastly consistent in ideology, and stable or at least predictable in temperament.

      Everyone has to really trust that everyone else isn’t going to make posts inconsistent with their previous posts, or attack friendlies, etc. Trust is especially difficult to build, not so much because it’s online but because our pro-White activity attracts so many enemies who clad themselves as allies.

    • Don’t know, but I’ll try it:

      Ivy League admissions is an area where it’s pretty easy to demonstrate jewish privilege. (((Ron Unz))) demonstrated this very clearly in “The Myth of American Meritocracy.”

      The main point is that, relative to the number of high-achieving students of each race (National Merit Semifinalists– good proxy for high IQ), Asians and Whites both suffer adverse effects from anti-White racial preferences. However, if the “White” category is broken down into Jews and non-Jews, the findings are startlingly different. Best quotes from the original piece:

      “Consider the ratio of the recent 2007–2011 enrollment of Asian students at Harvard relative to their estimated share of America’s recent NMS semifinalists, a reasonable proxy for the high-ability college-age population, and compare this result to the corresponding figure for whites. The Asian ratio is 63 percent, slightly above the white ratio of 61 percent, with both these figures being considerably below parity due to the substantial presence of under-represented racial minorities such as blacks and Hispanics, foreign students, and students of unreported race.”

      If we separate out the Jewish students, their ratio turns out to be 435 percent, while the residual ratio for non-Jewish whites drops to just 28 percent, less than half of even the Asian figure. As a consequence, Asians appear under-represented relative to Jews by a factor of seven, while non-Jewish whites are by far the most under-represented group of all, despite any benefits benefits they might receive from athletic, legacy, or geographical distribution factors. The rest of the Ivy League tends to follow a similar pattern, with the overall Jewish ratio being 381 percent, the Asian figure at 62 percent, and the ratio for non-Jewish whites a low 35 percent, all relative to their number of high-ability college-age students.”

      To repeat: when it comes to Ivy League admissions, high-achieving Asians are somewhat underrepresented relative to high-achieving “whites” (when the numbers for Whites and jews are combined). When Whites and jews are disaggregated, the findings are even more remarkable– Asians are underrepresented by a factor of 7 relative to Jews. But high-achieving (non-jewish) Whites are underrepresented by a factor of more than 15 relative to high-achieving jews. This anti-white discrimination is, somehow, even less newsworthy than the discrimination against Asians.

      The primary beneficiaries of “affirmative action” (Anti-White racial preferences), at least in the Ivies, are not blacks and Mexicans, but Jews.

      The main drawnack of this piece is that it’s quite long, and rather dry. Very few people are going to read the whole thing, so the typical jewish fallback position is to mischaracterize the results as demonstrating that Asians are discriminated against in Ivy League admissions in favor of “Whites,” while ignoring/ grossly mischaracterizing the (much more significant) findings with respect to jewish nepotism and anti-White discrimination.

      Here’s a shorter version of the findings from Unz, which people might be a little more likely to read:

      Graphs are good, too:

  • Re: Admission to America’s top universities. People should see the groundbreaking report:

    The Myth of American Meritocracy (by Ron Unz)
    wherein he finds more than 1/4 of the Harvard student body is Jewish:

    Each year Natl Merit Scholars Corp names America’s highest ability 16,000 graduating HS seniors (fewer than 1000 Jews, almost 15,000 Whites & Asians)

    Ivy Leagues enroll 10,000 yearly (7000 Whites & Asians, and 3000 Jews)

    Ivy Leagues obviously dip into lower Jewish ability, instead of drawing from the 15,000 other publicly identified candidates of greater ability but different ethnicity.

  • Unpopular opinion:

    Even though the effects mostly negative, the protestant reformation was inevitable.

    The spirit that drove the Alt-Right to re-discover the truth and spread it … would also drive us to find out what’s in that darn bible that we’re not allowed to read and fact check what the priest is saying

    The next religion should take this aspect of our nature into account.

  • Um, no. Don’t need a screed against AA. Need more a big picture of protest against current dogma and its fundamental value system.

  • Please don’t use Luther as a symbol or meme. He was the first Protestant heresiarch, he was the first left-winger, the first rebel against the hierarchical order of the Catholic Church and society, the first after the unfortunate Great Schism to fully break Christendom, unified Catholic Europe. Protestantism destroyed Christendom in the West while Islam destroyed it in the East. Protestantism is just an early expression of the disease we’re fighting today.

    • We’ve got parts 2 and 3 to still publish, so you’re gonna have to suffer through it.

      Its just a meme at this point anyway, simmer down.

      • Don’t feed the Jew please. He’s just trying to sow division with false indignation and use religion to turn us against each other.

      • Apologies for OT, but I’ve a “Mod” question.

        Last night I had four posts “Detected as spam” on this article. The Myth of American Meritocracy is a report shows clear bias against Whites at elite universities, from whence come our “elites” (future rulers, and powers-that-be) Three contained links to the report, but even after losing the link, I was still unable to get it to post.

        Today I’m told “spam” is my enemy, can lead to pre-moderation.

        Is this something you can help me with? Can you see my posts, and clear one? A post with the chart, preferably. If unable to clear, can you remove “Detected as spam”, and change it to “Removed”?

        Thanks is advance, any consideration given my request will be appreciated.

  • Yeah I’ve been thinking about this all year. It’s the 500th anniversary of the Reformation and nobody is talking about it. It’s a sure sign that we have forgotten who we are.

  • The means by which the “accomplishments, preparation, experience, performance, talents, abilities, and references” necessary for admission to the most elite academic institutions is tilted against those with “estrogen and melanin, vaginas and dark skin.” The greatest predictor of a child’s future success is who his parents are, so he better hope that he chose them well. Affirmative action exists to bring equality to means so that equality of opportunity might exist.

  • Martin Luther was terrible! Before the Protestant Reformation, Europe was strong and united under the Catholic Church, which was the only form of Christianity. There is only 1 true Christian Church, and that is the Catholic Church! Luther’s heresy led to the eventual establishment of all the Protestant sects we see today. Europe was weakened, and wars were even fought between Catholics and Protestants. While he may have written truths about the evil of the Jews, his flawed ideologies were extremely harmful for Europe and pitted whites against whites. Moreover, to this day the Jews use the weakened and divided Church to their advantage, with devastating results.

    • The Catholic Church in Luther’s time had degenerated into a corrupt institution. Luther was right to criticize the church for taking poor peasant’s money while telling them that they or their deceased loved ones were guaranteed a place in Heaven. He was also right to criticize the idea of having a celibate clergy. And he was right to print the Bible in a language that commoners could read. Luther was actually disgusted with much of the violence that took place during the Reformation. And he wrote a famous treatise in which he was highly critical of Jews. Perhaps you’ve heard of it?

      “First, their synagogues should be set on fire … Secondly, their homes should likewise be broken down and destroyed ….Thirdly, they should be deprived of their prayer-books and Talmuds …Fourthly, their rabbis must be forbidden under threat of death to teach any more … Fifthly, passport and traveling privileges should be absolutely for­bidden to the Jews …. Sixthly, they ought to be stopped from usury…. Seventhly, let the young and strong Jews and Jewesses be given the flail, the ax, the hoe, the spade, the distaff, and spindle, and let them earn their bread
      by the sweat of their noses … We ought to drive the rascally lazy bones out of our system …. Therefore away with them ….

      “To sum up, dear princes and nobles who have Jews in your domains, if this advice of mine does not suit you, then find a better one so that you and we may all be free of this insufferable devilish burden-the Jews.”

      • Yes, and no one ever seems to remember that the Borgias were marranos! They were Jews who, through simony, bought their way into the pontificate and twisted sacred doctrines for filth lucre’s sake! Luther, like our Blessed St.Adolf Hitler, only did what he felt was right in his battle against the eternal Jew, and even though I am a Catholic, I refuse to condemn his honorable actions, which he undertook to reform and thus save Holy Mother Church, NOT destroy it!

    • I agree that schism harmed Aryans in the long run, but, and I am saying this as a Catholic, he was right to call out that filthy marrano Jewish pseudo-popes, the Borgias. Honorable Aryans cannot abide Jews or the Jewification of our culture and religion and he did what was necessary at that time, although the Jews manipulated the situation towards their own ends.

    • Your current pope is enough reason for me to laugh-off your supposed injuries. Maybe another “Children’s Crusade” might reaffirm my faith in your papist religiosity, but probably not. Get over your wounds, and let them heal. Our race is dying.

  • I cringe at the use of protestant memes. Protestants brought Europe closer to the jews and started or at least enabled the slow descent towards liberalism.

    • Exactly! The Protestant Reformation was one of the worst things to ever happen in Europe. Before it, Catholicism was the only form of Christianity. When Luther broke away, the floodgates were opened and Europeans began to split into all the different sects, leading to terrible consequences that exist still today.

        • Of course I have! And Constantinople was founded long before the Great Schism, and thus was originally Christian (Catholic). I will say that Eastern Orthodox Christians are some of the most devout, conservative, and traditional people who exist today, and I am certainly not condemning them. The point is that divisions and splits in the Church – which Luther devastatingly caused – are not good for Europe or Whites.

          • How would you evaluate the accuracy of this statement then, “Before it, Catholicism was the only form of Christianity.”

          • Good point, though Orthodox Christianity is obviously very similar to Roman Catholicism. I guess I just did not want to unfairly place Orthodox Christianity under the same banner as Protestantism, which is far worse and destructive.

    • yeah but he got redpilled later in life, after he understood the truth about hte jews and stopped worshiping them.

      • Doesn’t matter if he was redpilled on the JQ, all Europeans were, Catholic and heretic. Truth is he was a raving heresiarch that would eventually spawn the Enlightenment, which was merely a political incarnation of what Luther already expounded theologically. Protestantism democratized faith, the Enlightenment democratized the state. A double assault on the ancient Catholic order of altar and throne.

        • He was trying to reform the church, which was infiltrated by Jews! The very pope in Rome was a Satanic Jew! A devil was sitting on the throne of St.Peter for Christ sake, what would you have him do? Sit back as some sleazy rat demands endless shekels in exchange for salvation that is not his to give?

          • You sir clearly don’t understand the history of the Protestant Revolt. Pope Leo was not Jewish, and unlike Martin Luther, he was not a heresiarch. There was instances of corruption of practice (but not doctrine) in the human element of the Church at the time— same as every time. That was corrected by the Counter-Reformation & the Council of Trent. But Luther wasn’t looking to reform abuses— he was creating his own heretical religion, Protestantism, which didn’t exist before then. And he loved the Jews at first, the only reason he turned on them is because they wouldn’t help him because they were afraid of the Catholic Church. Oh, and he actively supported the Islamic invasion of Europe, because he wanted to see the Church weakened. He was a swine, a heretic, a maniac with a scatological obsession… honestly, I’m surprised you were never redpilled on Protestantism yet.

          • As an aside, you don’t seem to understand what indulgences are either, nor do you apparently know that John Tetzel was sanctioned by the Church as well as Luther.

  • White Men do not under Privilege.

    We operate under Public Law.

    Blacks, Browns and to some extent Women (mostly the childless cat keeping Feminists) and especially Jews operate under Private Laws that white men have neither access to nor recourse to.

    Privilege means Private Law.

    • These theses are very true.
      However the exception is “white males self-defeatingly created affirmative action”. This isn’t totally true, as it omits the Kosher elephant in the room. Jews’ roles in creating and instituting the concept of “affirmative action” (i.e. anti-White policies) cannot be understated.
      That isn’t to excuse the collaborative role of Shabbos goyim cucks and traitors.

    • Google is paying 97$ per hour,with weekly payouts.You can also avail this.
      On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $11752 this last four weeks..with-out any doubt it’s the most-comfortable job I have ever done .. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
      ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleDailyConsumerFindJournalsJobsSite1/easy/jobs ★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫:::::!ka163lzzz

Leave a Reply