Perspective

America Became 1984 In 1964

Submitted by Emmanual Sprager

**

The United States of America was transformed into a Cultural Marxist, soft totalitarian state a long time ago, back in the Civil Rights era in fact. People like to think of America as possessing a kind of continuous, uninterrupted history and identity. In truth, America has been 3 or 4 distinct civilizations/societies from its founding to the present. There is no real meaningful relationship between the America of today and the America of the founding era, not culturally, morally, ethically, spiritually or ideologically anyway. There are some loose, attenuated governmental and legal connections, but the real defining characteristics of the nation today are not just different, they are fundamentally at odds with the defining characteristics of American society 200 years ago.

It was not just the legal changes of the 1960’s that transformed the nation into a Cultural Marxist, soft totalitarian state (getting harder by the day), it was the spiritual/ideological changes. America went from a nation defined by a single socio-racial and religious heritage into a diversity worshiping dystopia hell-bent on joining the Third World. Those spiritual changes loom large over America to this very day. Indeed, arguably the first bona fide challenge to the spiritual hegemony of the Civil Rights era was Donald Trump’s election, and the Cultural Marxist oligarchy is still having none of it. Power structures do not cede power without a fight. What’s more, Trump’s challenge to the hegemony of that value system is woefully incomplete and insufficient. Yet this has not stopped that power structure from reacting maniacally and frenetically to the threat Trump poses. Trump Derangement Syndrome is a kind of nervous breakdown by oligarchs and power players, the visible symptoms of the US power structure’s intense anxiety about the threat Trump and those like him pose to its hegemony over the nation and its spirit.

It is true that Civil Rights legislation came about in part to address a real dilemma afflicting American society, but that legislation was also, on a fundamental level, the legislation of morality. For the most part, the left doesn’t deny this either. It is quite amusing how the political left has no problem legislating morality as long it’s their morality! And the Civil Rights Act was a far-reaching morality regulating law, which altered the basic social and moral structures of American life. Not only that, civil rights laws and like laws have only metastasized in recent decades, into new and different domains, domains probably unimaginable at the time (protecting sexual preference for example). They are the primary means by which the Cultural Marxist power structure marginalizes and oppresses the ordinary people of America. America will never be delivered, it could never be delivered without the repeal of those diabolical laws and without the repudiation of the values those laws embody. And that does not look likely to occur or occur in time. If anything resembling the America of old is to be restored, it will likely have to be restored in the context of a new and separate nation-state.

The moment Americans passively sat back and allowed hostile, left-wing elites to pass a law that could effectively bankrupt harmless little cafes in backwoods Tennessee because they held and their patrons held personal racial preferences that the US power structure didn’t approve of, that made the effective persecution of “racists” a moral and legal mandate, it was all over for the America that had existed prior to the Civil Rights era, its Western heritage and its genetic profile. When whites ceded control of their own communities and the demographic profile of those communities to the Federal Government, all the Federal Government had to do at that point to effectively genocide them was to stop enforcing immigration law and defending the borders (which it promptly did, and in conjunction with changes in immigration policy itself, i.e. Hart-Celler, the demographic transformation of America would be both rapid and radical). Now Americans were being invaded on multiple levels and besieged daily from every direction. We couldn’t keep Third World peoples out of our communities or our country! So much for there being any choice in the matter. Between cultural proximity that leads to intimidation by more primitive populations, the cultural decline that naturally accompanies the emulation of less intellectually gifted peoples, the temptation that leads to miscegenation and a hundred like attendant forces, white America was finished and so too was America itself, at least the White/Euro-dominated versions of it.

Furthermore, with the media and academia in the hands of our Cultural Marxist enemies, we weren’t free to associate freely or date freely or choose much of anything freely in our personal lives, without the potential for harassment or public shaming on account of possessing the wrong values, nor could we speak our consciences openly or vote for a government that might secure the border or protect white interests, because we feared being labeled racist and so did those we were voting for. After all, the great defining moral event of our age, the Civil Rights Movement, taught whites definitively that [white] racism was the ultimate wrong, the ultimate evil. And well, that just isn’t true. They who are educated by their enemies are not so much educated as primed for ruin.

It is through this systemic process that Whites were and are being dispossessed and now being outright slated for replacement. Moreover, while it is true that the legal changes which came about in the 1960s created a number of incentives for corporate and business entities to extend and enforce the fundamentally totalitarian, supposedly moral principles of the Civil Rights Movement, the truth is that the business community, by and large, did and still does this on its own accord. The US power structure overwhelmingly agrees with both the objective fictions and moral fictions of Cultural Marxism. Nobody is forcing Google to become a “Goolag”, or making Mozilla oust its CEO for participating in democracy or compelling Twitter to shadow-ban dissidents. For the most part, it is the fervor of anti-racism and anti-sexism and an unwholesome obsession with absolute equality which drives these businesses to do evil in the name of good. And until we realize that policing racism and sexism and other related equality-oriented -isms, no matter how trivial a particular transgression or inequality be, is not a moral pursuit but an immoral one, we will continue down the road to harder forms of totalitarianism.

And it should be said that there is no inherent value in equality besides. Equality is a false god. Madly pursuing gender equality or racial equality or any equality for that matter is a road to nowhere except misery and serfdom.

Aspiring to enforce any moral system, including but not limited to the Cultural Marxist moral system currently being enforced in the Western World, down to trivial and minor and private activities, down to the level of personal preference, words, free association, customer choice, political values, etc. is itself the root of totalitarianism. The Alt-Right only exists because the actual right doesn’t seem capable of addressing this mother of all issues, and because of that, it cannot possibly save America or anything in America worth saving, including but not limited to the race that founded and forged it.

 

Guest Writer
the authorGuest Writer

89 Comments

  • Other drugs may affect tadalafil, including prescription and over-the-counter medicines, vitamins, and herbal products cheap cialis generic online Viagra della Pfizer cosГ¬ come Viagra generico Italia hanno dimostrato di essere efficaci nel combattere la DE

  • The Race Relations Act 1965 was the first legislation in the United Kingdom to address racial discrimination. The Act outlawed discrimination on the “grounds of colour, race, or ethnic or national origins” in public places. It also prompted the creation of The Race Relations Board (in 1966), to consider complaints under the Act. […] The Act was strengthened with the Race Relations Act 1968, which extended the legislation’s remit to cover employment and housing. It was repealed by the Race Relations Act 1976, which saw the creation of the Commission for Racial Equality. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_Relations_Act_1965

    Jews had been active in the pursuit of such laws in Britain since at least the 1940s. In the aftermath of World War II, Britain still played host to a number of groups sympathetic to Fascism and racial nationalism. These groups, together with the growing prominence of vocal politicians like Enoch Powell, alarmed the Jewish population. Of course, this was the same Jewish population which had repaid British war-time assistance by supporting, in every conceivable way, the Irgun terrorist campaign against the British in Palestine. One Jewish historian has remarked that Jews in Britain lavishly funded “the purchase of arms for Jewish underground armies fighting against British troops.”[1] Jewish terrorism against the British had culminated in 1947 with the kidnapping of two British army Intelligence Corps NCOs, Sergeant Clifford Martin and Sergeant Mervyn Paice. Martin and Paice were beaten and bloodied by their Jewish captors, before being hanged in a eucalyptus grove near Netanya. Their bodies were booby-trapped with mines, causing them to be torn to pieces when efforts were made to retrieve them. The brutal and sadistic slayings comprising the ‘Sergeant’s Affair’ had followed the bombing of Jerusalem’s King David Hotel (British headquarters in Palestine) a year earlier. The new atrocity sparked a wave of revulsion throughout Britain. More specifically, the actions caused the British people to re-think Jewish loyalty. Following the hanging of Martin and Paice, a series of anti-Jewish riots broke out across Britain, further alarming Jews who still clung to empty professions of British patriotism. Jewish stores across the country were destroyed, or painted with slogans such as “Hitler was right.” […] in 1965 the NCCI had been inexplicably appointed to “advise the British government on matters relating to the integration of Commonwealth immigrants.”[15] From its early days of operation, the NCCI, which became the Community Relations Commission in 1968, was staffed with Jewish lawyers like Anthony Lester (1936–). Although never elected to any public office, and as stated in his Wikipedia entry, Lester was “directly involved with the drafting of race relations legislation in Britain.” In 1968 Lester founded the Runnymede Trust, described on its website as “the UKs leading independent race equality think tank.” Indicative of the ethnic composition of the Trust, and its deeper origins and goals, Lester had founded the organization with his fellow Jew, Jim Rose. Rose is described in the Palgrave Dictionary of Anglo-Jewish History as the “Director of the Survey of Race Relations in Britain. … The Race Relations Act owed much to him.”[16] So basically, if you see a ‘think tank’ described as ‘independent,’ you can be sure its board reads like a Bar Mitzvah invitation list. The Occidental Observer, 20 November 2014. Jews, Multiculturalism, and the War on Free Speech: A TOO Case File.

      • Regarding the terror campaign in London 1947, from 41:50:

        [The commanding officer of Misrahi] Yaacov Eliav’s most evil plot is described in the hebrew edition of his memoirs, but was edited out of the english version. Later on in 1947, a few months after this business in Trafalgar Square, Eliav acquired active cultures of cholera bacteria from jewish contacts at the Pasteur institute in Paris. An expert water engineer was sent to London to scout out the best method for introducing cholera into the cities’ water supply. And it was only because the other wing of the zionist effort succeeded in winning United Nations’ backing, winning the crucial United Nations vote towards the end of 1947 that this cholera plan was abandoned – it wasn’t necessary, they had won anyway,”

        The SS Empire Windrush holds a special place of infamy in the minds of British Nationalists. When the ship arrived at Tilbury docks from Jamaica in June 1948, carrying 417 Black immigrants, it represented more than just a turning point in the history of those ancient isles. In some respects it signalled the beginning of mass, organized non-White immigration into northwest Europe. […] For all intents and purposes, the Empire Windrush was passed into Jewish ownership by a Jewish Secretary for War, given the green light to boost profits and start bringing non-Whites to Britain by a Jewish Minister for Transport, and provided with armies of eager passengers by a Jewish-owned media. Despite these facts, a very different narrative emerged in the aftermath of the ship’s arrival. Pollard writes that “in the years since the arrival of the Empire Windrush … a myth has taken hold that the British government was responsible for bringing the passengers over as part of a concerted plan to help overcome a labour shortage. …But this is wrong. It is clear from the reaction of ministers that they were as surprised as the public when they first learned, via a telegram from the Acting Governor of Jamaica on May 11, what was about to happen.” The myth was a helpful one because it acknowledged the un-democratic nature of the event while deflecting blame away from the most obvious source of the scourge — the Jews of the shipping industry and the Ministry of Transport. Occidental Observer, 12 July 2015. The SS Empire Windrush: The Jewish Origins of Multicultural Britain.

  • “If anything resembling the America of old is to be restored, it will likely have to be restored in the context of a new and separate nation-state.”

    A better solution to the black problem in America would have been to partition the U.S. in the ’60’s, and let the blacks have their own country. The biggest impediment to partition will always be those patriots who have ego invested in a country that is as big as possible, i.e., a nation that covers as much territory as it can bring under its control. For this variety of patriotic nationalist, a letting go of geographic territory will never feel appropriate.

  • actually the first step was bringing in slaves. Liberating blacks from 2nd tier status. right, that’s totalitarianism
    Let’s see whites origianlly came to America as workers for the NWO exploiters. Do I have that right. Same with blacks, but they ended up being slaves since none had lobbyists in England to lobby their concerns. By my read, original blacks own America as much as original whites
    However, bad immigration policies are not being trumpeted here
    To fine tune, origianl settlers were here to do work for the exploiting elites. the fact that Indians needed to be genocided to get that work done? I’ll give credit to Jews for that and the rich race suck ups who catered to them

  • I agree and after the Civil Rights Movement, teenagers in the 1970s were pushed to vote for abortion, women’s rights, gay rights, and participate in race mixing and promiscuity. Church was out of the question. Back then, you rarely heard of someone with a dui, only the hippies were on drugs, and road rage meant that someone would probably honk at you, not shoot you. The word, f*** was nonexistent. We were much better people then. No way would the NFL dare disrespect our flag. No one would have shown up for the games if they did. Illegal immigrants weren’t coddled; they were picked up and deported during traffic stops or trying to apply for welfare. There was much more of a sense of decency. There was a work ethic and Christian principles were lived by back then.

  • It started in the 30s with the rise of what was then called the administrative state. That was when they gave the Feds more control with laws like the Securities Act of 1933, the 34 Exchange Act, the FLSA, FDR’s Court packing scheme, and of course Social Security. From there it has only grown.

  • The 1960s solidified our demise…20 years after 6 gorrilian Jews faked Thier deaths we got jewfooked by Thier inside baseball machinations. Ford was right, McCarthy was right, Louis t McFadden was right,
    Lindberg… And Hitler…

  • The civil rights movement was a typical Jewish PR scam. As many have noted, the Jews chose the easily handled drunkard, lecher, and buffoon Michael (“Reverand Doctor Martin Luther”) King as their frontman, with CPUSA Jew Stanley Levison as his handler and speechwriter. The Jews were all up and down the funding and promotion of CORE and the SNCC, all up in “voter registration drives” for the dumb schwartzes, and lo and behold, which two “Whites” were involved in pointing the finger at innocent Whites for a church that the Jews and their pet negroes had burned down, when the “Mississippi Burning” retribution occurred? Why, along with the mindless schwarze, two Jewish boys from New Yawk, Michael Schwermer and Andrew Goodman! This trend of traveling down from New York as “Freedom Riders,” inciting blacks into lawlessness, then turning on the film cameras when the White men of the South dared to defend their communities and portraying it as “Evil White Devil sicks dog and blasts fire hose at poor negro for no reason!”
    Look at the hilariously dishonest Jewish treatment of this kind of thing on Wikipedia:
    “Volunteers were the brightest of their generation, came from the best universities from the biggest states, mostly from the North, usually were rich, 90 percent were white. Though SNCC’s committee agreed to recruit only one hundred white students for the project in December 1963, white civil rights leaders such as Allard Lowenstein went on and recruited a much larger number of white volunteers, to bring more attention. ”
    Lowenstein was one of the primary Jewish handlers of William F. Buckley, defanging what little bite American conservatism had from thereon. As always, the Hollywood treatment of “Missisippi Burning” from the Jews at MGM and Bernstein’s Orion Pictures was as 100% full of bullshit as you’d expect.
    Some of the prominent Freedom Riders included: Zev Aelony, Ed Blankenheim, Bob Filner (yes, THAT Bob Filner), Carol Ruth Silver (quite possibly the ugliest Jewess that ever lived), Daniel Stern, and when they started Jewing a little too hard, RFK sent his deputy Jew John Seigenthaler to provide some more big brained Jewish PR to smooth over the destruction of the South.
    In their own words, from “James Baldwin and the Jewish Freedom Rider: “To be exact, nearly two-thirds of the Freedom Riders were Jewish which is “quite an amazing feat for a minority which made up less than 2% of the entire American population” (Weinblatt 5).”
    How amazing, how brave, how coincidental!

  • It is never a question of whether there will be discrimination or no discrimination. It is always instead a question of what forms of discrimination will be permitted or even required by the State. The very act of proscribing specific forms of discrimination merely replaces one form with another. Once association becomes a legal issue it must necessarily become a legal issue. Then the path of totalitarianism is set.

  • Please correct the headline so people won’t think the AltRight is stupid – it should be America, not American.

  • The civil rights movement was a typical Jewish PR scam. As many have noted, the Jews chose the easily handled drunkard, lecher, and buffoon Michael (“Reverand Doctor Martin Luther”) King as their frontman, with CPUSA Jew Stanley Levison as his handler and speechwriter. The Jews were all up and down the funding and promotion of CORE and the SNCC, all up in “voter registration drives” for the dumb schwartzes, and lo and behold, which two “Whites” were involved in pointing the finger at innocent Whites for a church that the Jews and their pet negroes had burned down, when the “Mississippi Burning” retribution occurred? Why, along with the mindless schwarze, two Jewish boys from New Yawk, Michael Schwermer and Andrew Goodman! This trend of traveling down from New York as “Freedom Riders,” inciting blacks into lawlessness, then turning on the film cameras when the White men of the South dared to defend their communities and portraying it as “Evil White Devil sicks dog and blasts fire hose at poor negro for no reason!”

    Look at the hilariously dishonest Jewish treatment of this kind of thing on Wikipedia:

    “Volunteers were the brightest of their generation, came from the best universities from the biggest states, mostly from the North, usually were rich, 90 percent were white. Though SNCC’s committee agreed to recruit only one hundred white students for the project in December 1963, white civil rights leaders such as Allard Lowenstein went on and recruited a much larger number of white volunteers, to bring more attention. ”

    Lowenstein was one of the primary Jewish handlers of William F. Buckley, defanging what little bite American conservatism had from thereon. As always, the Hollywood treatment of “Missisippi Burning” from the Jews at MGM and Bernstein’s Orion Pictures was as 100% full of bullshit as you’d expect.

    Some of the prominent Freedom Riders included: Zev Aelony, Ed Blankenheim, Bob Filner (yes, THAT Bob Filner), Carol Ruth Silver (quite possibly the ugliest Jewess that ever lived), Daniel Stern, and when they started Jewing a little too hard, RFK sent his deputy Jew John Seigenthaler to provide some more big brained Jewish PR to smooth over the destruction of the South.

    In their own words, from “James Baldwin and the Jewish Freedom Rider: “To be exact, nearly two-thirds of the Freedom Riders were Jewish which is “quite an amazing feat for a minority which made up less than 2% of the entire American population” (Weinblatt 5).”

    How amazing, how brave, how coincidental!

  • I agree with the premise that America cannot be restored to what it formerly was and will require Aryans to separate themselves and build something new and better. We should start looking at options like Orania – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orania,_Northern_Cape
    If we build settlements like that across the more sparsely populated regions then we can start laying out the foundations of a future nation for ourselves. We can’t even begin to think about separatism or defending ourselves against Jewish tyranny without first having the infrastructure in place. We need our own communities, with our own farms producing our own food, our own factories producing our own goods, and for us to be able to point to it all and say we built it and no one else, just like the Boers have done with Orania.

      • Yep, building infrastructure so we the Jews cannot harm our income/families is definitely enclavism. Totally makes sense.

        • “will require Aryans to separate themselves and build something new and better….. If we build settlements like that across the more sparsely populated regions…… Just like the Boers/Orania.”
          Yeah, sure doesn’t sound like enclavism. You’re right.

          • Building the foundations of a future state is wrong? Care to explain? Or are you going to make sarcastic comments like an angry little jew?

      • Building our own communities is a good step in the right direction. It’s not the be all end all and after we’re done with that we sit back like we’re done. We’re not overthrowing the current power structure all at once. It starts with building strong localized communties of resistance.

  • I’m guessing that if you were a minority then you wouldn’t be so eager to fight against morality legislation which stopped the majority from simply deciding which bathroom, store or institution you could use. Just sayin’…

    • 1) Civil Rights Act went waaaaayyy beyond governmental desegregation. It regulates the commercial activities of private organizations & businesses.
      2) As the author stated it was the legislation of a Marxist morality. The law & its spirit regulates in some sense virtually every aspect of American life, no matter how trivial or private.

      • Yeah well realistically private organisations and businesses are kind of indespensible. You don’t buy your food from the government, if you piss your pants in public cause the mall won’t let you use the bathroom, that’s private sector too.

        • Silly argument. Plenty of businesses to shop at in America. Just because A won’t serve you doesn’t mean B-Z won’t.
          Furthermore, not all services & business are indispensable, only some are. For example, nobody ever starved from not getting a wedding cake.

    • And? Just sayin’, that’s why you don’t want to be a minority, nor to have a great number of ‘minorities’ in your nation – where interests conflict, someone has to lose out, and guess who its going to be? Minorities. And why wouldn’t it be, or rather, why SHOULDN’T it be?

      MInorities WILL ALWAYS be treated differently, and less well, than the majority. Its inevitable. So what argument is it, if any at all, to note that those who are not minorities do not want to become minorities, and thus should not take actions that will lead to them becoming minorities?

      This is some seriously limp-dicked argumentation, as I’m guessing you’re not going to try to argue that acknowledging minorities invariably are treated worse means you should aim to become one yourself in your efforts reduce the degree as to how much worse that treatment ends up being for said minorities. Don’t like being a minority? Get the fuck out of White nations… Don’t try to turn White nations into mudnations so you can be the one treating Whitey like shit and think yourself morally justified, which is exactly what has happened.

    • The latest episode of Mysterium Fasces had Heimbach on to talk about American Nationalism, why its stupid and why an alliance with Liberals who don’t like Black people is counter productive. It’s worth listening to: https://soundcloud.com/florian-geyer-9/mysterium-fasces-episode-37-american-nationalism

      The barrage of buffoons we saw after UTR saying that the Alt-Right needs to distance itself from Fascist/NatSoc/Traditionalist/Revolutionary elements is probably why Spencer and Enoch will not be at this event.

      • They need to get over it. White Nationalism is, was, and always will be a revolutionary ideology that only the strong can carry out.

        • Yeah. The Liberals are actually pro-system though. Their single issue autistes that think that non-whites are undermining liberalism. In my view diversity is a symptom of liberalism, which is the problem. Basically the two camps are working towards very different goals, though on the surface it looks the same to normies.

      • I didn’t think much of Heimbach until I listened to that podcast. I was listening to it and thought to myself, “This Matt guy is very intelligent.”

        • Yeah. He’s a likeable and bright guy, and does a lot of good work in the Appalachia region. He just needs to work on his aesthetics.

      • M.Heimbach has his neo-nazi/Southener foreign/dividing brand, so no wonder he knows his brand will become a 3rd wheel in a White nationalist American nationalism paradigm

        • He’s a national socialist and southerner. I don’t think he’s worried about becoming third wheel. The point is he is not an American Nationalist wheras most Racist Liberals are. He’s not trying to rock the boat, he’s trying to sink it. Alliances only make sense when both parties are working towards the same goals.

      • I thought we were just giving up the Nazi symbols and white power themes? we are anti fascist (standing as one)? you have to be a capitalist, which pits brother vs brother in a ruthless contest for resources? no revolution against the neo cons/liberals? than wtf are we doing, trying to get women and minorities to like us?

        • The host Florian Geyer compares this mindset to rearranging the seats on the Titanic to make the ride more comforatble which I thought was poignant. I agree with developing our own symbols, not because I’m offended by the old symbols or I’m particularly concerned with what normies think, but because using symbols of a movement from the past is LARPy and nonsensical. We should always pay respects to the heroes from our past, but we need to forge our own path.

      • as far as heimbach’s angle though, we can just be anti courts and not lose the ear of patriotard americans that might eventually see the truth. we shouldn’t alienate anyone to the right of conservatives

        • I like this video of him schooling a couple Antifas at the Trump innauguration. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7f9EGOlrMs

          His only real problem is he’s an everyman, like someone you’d meet at a bar and strike up a conversation with or something. He doesn’t have the charisma of a Mussolini or Hitler, and the way TWP present themselves sometimes falls on the LARPy side. Still I respect him and his group.

  • Speaking of a culture war the decay of America’s culture began in earnest around the late 1950’s and the 1960’s.

    During the prior decades European Jews flooded the US. They brought with them the “Frankfurt school of Cultural Marxism’. America’s cultural decay which is unprecedented in the speed and destruction it has done, is due to this Jewish European influence. I would also add the “The 45 Communist Goals to take over America” as another powerful force deliberately used to dismantle America.

    We should not have collapsed so quickly. All our Christian traditions were working well and America as a Christian nation prospered extremely well since our foundation even taking the civil war into account. We help define the world and is still called “The American Century”.

    The cultural upheaval of the 1960’s which included the counter culture movement, rise of Marxism, the hippie generation, the drug culture, Feminism, the Gay movement, the rise of militant black movements, the disintegration of the family, the hatred of Christianity and much more happened in a short time of 10 years. The generation who were the parents came from the Great Generation and gave the most to their children.

    In that sense the social upheavals of the 1960’s was contrived to bring down America in the long run and it has succeeded to a greater extent.

    • America has a long tradition of anti-Christian thinking coming from white guys. You can’t blame the Jews for Robert Ingersoll, Mark Twain, Thomas Edison, H.L. Mencken and other American religious skeptics.

      • Kent State should actually be revisited as conspiracy theory. The SDS had burned down an ROTC hut and were staging stuff there. The Major of the City, Governor and Senator were all in conflict right before a primary election.

        Only one troop of NG opened fire all were wearing gas masks at the moment.

      • Naw, they dinjew nothin….

        “On April 10, 1970, Jerry Rubin, a leader of the Youth International Party (Yippie party), spoke on campus. In remarks reported locally, he said ““The first part of the Yippie program is to kill your parents. They are the first oppressors.”

        Speaking of Woodstock, the music festival was organized by: Michael Lang, Joel Rosenman, and Artie Kornfeld, all Jews!

        Funny how the mayor of Kent called a state of emergency only AFTER the Jewish-led mob started burying the Constitution, called for burning down the ROTC building, smashing store windows, throwing beer bottles at police cars, started a bonfire in the middle of the street, broke a bank window and started an alarm, yelling obscenities and throwing glass and rocks at the police, threatening businesses that they’d be burned down if they didn’t put up Vietnam protest signs, . Compare to Charlottesville 2.0, and note that 99% of the public think that “Nazis murdered Heather Heyer” is what happened at one incident and “police shot peaceful protesters at Kent State for no reason” is what happened at another. It’s all bullshit, folks, and all that matters is who controls the megaphone that spews it.

        That’s precisely why Jews like the historian Stanley Karnow write all about it, the Jew Jonathan Halperin directed “The Day the 60s died” about it, the Jew Oliver Stone included it in “Nixon” with heavy bias, the Jew Jerry Fishman wrote “How Nixon Taught America to do the Kent State Mambo,” and even a Jew sculptor, George Segal, have jumped on the “memory making” for such events, simultaneously condemning a gentile establishment’s war (that was actually promoted, foremost, by the Jew Walt Rostow), to profit and lie and nation-wreck at the same time.

  • America is a contradiction. Its foundations are both liberal and racialist. In their haste to get rid of European authority the founders apparently didn’t think of the potential for liberalism to get out of control and destroy its founding stock.

      • Liberalism is all about the destruction of existing social structures, 1700s liberals may have been racialists but that didn’t come from liberalism itself. Like it or not the American and French revolutions sowed the seeds for marxism, communism and the mess we have today. Not to say that the social structures the first liberals fought against didn’t deserve their fate, we just failed to rein in the dogs once we let them loose.

        • “Like it or not the American and French revolutions sowed the seeds for marxism, communism and the mess we have today.”

          No they didn’t. Marxism has only one origin, and that’s judaism. Communism was financed and spread by jews and no one else.

          Claiming that American founding fathers were proto-bolsheviks was a strategy that communists used to gain infuence in America.Not a single Founding Father would support what America has become.

          • Not a single founding father would support what America has become, but liberalism still tended to decay into further and further liberalism. Hideously self defeating ideas like woman’s suffrage, emancipation of blacks and white mass immigration came before “cultural marxism”.

            Marxism admittedly has a separate origin; Jews took advantage of pre-existing weaknesses and weaponized them, making the situation far worse, almost immediately fatal.

          • Winston Churchill:

            This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxemburg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognisable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.

Leave a Reply