News

British Home Secretary to Lock Herself Up?

Ruddy Hell!

There is a good reason that George Orwell’s dystopian novel “1984” was written in the UK. This was because there is definitely something “Orwellian” about a lot of Brits, like, for example, the present Home Secretary (Minister of the Interior) Amber Rudd.

Even though she comes from what is technically the “center-right” Conservative Party, Rudd is one of those dead-eyed apparatchiks who believes that ever-increasing state power, censorship, and “thought crime” legislation will move us all one step closer to the beautiful multicultural utopia that we have been denied for so long.

Her latest Orwellian initiative is to push for a ludicrous tightening of the law that could see people jailed for up to 15 years merely for viewing “terrorist” content online. For comparison, think about some of the ridiculously lenient sentences handed out to grooming rape gangs and people who lock women in their car boots.

Speaking at the Conservative Party conference, Rudd shared her anarcho-tyrannical vision with the press:

“I want to make sure those who view despicable terrorist content online, including jihadi websites, far-right propaganda and bomb-making instructions, face the full force of the law,” said Rudd. “There is currently a gap in the law around material [that] is viewed or streamed from the internet without being permanently downloaded. This is an increasingly common means by which material is accessed online for criminal purposes and is a particularly prevalent means of viewing extremist material such as videos and web pages.”

What laudable aims! What noble goals!

Of course, the British government would never in a million years think of using such an open-ended and subjectively interpreted law for locking up someone it just didn’t like, now, would it? And, naturally, it would never stoop to using such a nebulous law as a convenient way to balance the “oppression books” by locking up a few harmless White people so that actually dangerous minorities didn’t feel too “discriminated” against.

I mean it’s not like the Home Office abused its power to ban potential terrorists from traveling to the UK when they also banned the likes of Richard Spencer, Matthew Heimbach, and Pamela Geller from entering the country, is it? I mean all those people are exactly on a par with ISIS and Al Qaeda terrorists and their groupies, except possibly for the lack of UK funding.

Really, I would be all for the law if only it were imposed objectively, with everyone who repeatedly viewed actual terrorist content being locked behind bars — that would, of course, include the Home Secretary herself, who, as part of her job, has to repeatedly view terrorist material. I mean she must be completely radicalized into hating her own people by now. It certainly looks like it.

  • Patriotic American

    She should be put into an insane asylum.

    • Ike35

      She has been, it’s called the British gov’t.

      • McSwag

        And the American one isn’t?

        • Ike35

          There are many levels of insanity and I’m afraid the British have us beat. We’re not throwing people in prison for 15 years for looking at naughty talk on the internet.

          • McSwag

            Hasn’t happened yet.

          • Ike35

            True but it is happening in Britain now.

          • McSwag

            Yeah….so it seems….only read about it yesterday…on extended hols. Although it’s unlikely to trigger WWIII….unlike America and its insanity…(Putin, Iran, NK, China etc)

          • Ike35

            Don’t worry you’ll be pulled into it too.

          • McSwag

            Always use a VPN…also you can get PAYG mobile where you don’t have to register yout details….but it’s ominous all the same.

    • Captain John Charity Spring MA

      She looks like a bad drag act.

      • McSwag

        That’s my MP your’re slagging off.

      • Lorax100

        Ha.

      • Hagarqim

        what about her boss, the wicked witch of the West and this one looks like OZ!

  • Captain John Charity Spring MA

    Rudd? Ffs.

  • McSwag

    “Far right propaganda”…nice.

  • BWV

    This is the government getting in on the act of shutting down alt-Right websites. You already know they are not after jihadis or actual terrorists because they’re importing those as fast as they can.

    No, they will use terrorism as the justification. Then they will define any content they don’t like as terroristic propaganda. Then they will jail a few people for 15 years.

    The implication to internet providers will be clear enough: “If looking at this stuff will get you 15 years – I sure don’t want them to turn their attention to me for hosting/providing it.”

  • From Ohio

    Knowing Britain you’ll get more time for viewing the vague and ominous “far-right” propaganda than child porn.

  • KonigReich

    Time for Scottish Independence, Welsh Independence, Ulster Independence, even Cornwall independence. As soon as Britain is destroyed, the world will be a much better place.

    • Billy Brown

      ah if they didn’t use the brits they would have used some1 else. we all need a clean slate without ((())) and we will see what everyone is worth

  • Sturmmann

    So how much longer before it becomes illegal for us living in the UK to read Alt-Right.com and the Daily Stormer (amongst other websites)?

  • maxsnafu

    …and to think we regard Britain an ally. Fuck Britain and the British.

  • Riopel
    • Liddell

      Too close to lunchtime.

  • Just watch the far right and the Muslim terrorist ,cause all the other’s are good citizens full of peace, love and harmony.
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/35d4f0ec55ab9f23f2aac909c870e361fe7a25b551cab1465cbef87f62787925.jpg Something stinks

  • Frank Puskas

    “Even though she comes from what is technically the “center-right” Conservative Party, Rudd is one of those dead-eyed apparatchiks who believes that ever-increasing state power, censorship, and “thought crime” legislation will move us all one step closer to the beautiful multicultural utopia that we have been denied for so long.”
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4949bae608c081c25fdf9c1823dac57299dfeeadfcbe21396e1c98bf607645e7.jpg

  • Riopel

    “It sides automatically with the Dog against the Man, the Jew against the Christian, the black against the white, the servant against the master, the criminal against the judge. It is a form of moral perversion due to overdomestication, protestantism gone bad, just as are the other perversions with which our intellectuals are riddled.”
    -Roy Campbell on the British “elite”

    • Dragdar

      >protestantism gone bad
      it was always bad.

      • Riopel

        Martin Luther was okay. He was more redpilled on jews than the Catholics were back then,

  • Lavender

    This is why women have no business in government office. I never vote for women candidates and I’m a woman. I would have voted for Marine Le Pen. I guess there are exceptions but in general… no effing way!

    • Women have the future of the human race in their hands (or wombs if you want to be technical). The future of politics? Not so much.

    • Hagarqim

      and she even messed up the French Election because she was a bad debater and campaigner!

    • Billy Brown

      I rather have exceptional women in office than men trying to fix their countries while having to cater to women voters

      • Lavender

        Interesting point. So woman can lead but not vote? That’s probably better!

  • Air Strip One.

  • Zombee

    There is no freedom of speech or 2nd amendment rights for the British citizens, except for the Islamic jihadists that are taking over London, aka Londonistan. That’s why we colonized America and had a revolution to have those rights. We will never give them up without a fight.
    The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
    Thomas Jefferson

  • Newfoundlander

    I wonder how far they are going to take this law. WIll they just stick to altright websites, or push it further? Will Breitbart and the Daily Caller be considered ‘terrorist content’?

  • Gutenberg

    She and the mayor of Puerto Rico are the same person