News

The Genius of Merkel is the Useful Idiot of German Nationalism 

The central question of German politics since 1945 was always: “How will nationalism make its comeback to the German political mainstream?” Like a good suspense novel the German political system kept us guessing for a long time and even threw in a few political red herrings.

  • Would the Cold War see a form of German nationalism revived as a counterpoint to the militarism of the Soviet Union? Some of the scenes from the 1965 movie Battle of the Bulge clearly hinted at this.
  • Would Helmut Kohl’s 1990 reunification of east and west lead to a less cucked Fatherland that wasn’t scared of its own historical shadow?
  • Would the NPD be able to brush off its rough edges and overcome infiltrators from the security services to edge out of its East German ghettos?
  • And what about Pegida?

There was plenty to keep us guessing. All these narratives caught our attention for a while, only to reveal themselves as entertaining distractions. But, finally, with the results of Sunday’s election we were given our answer – the true German post-war miracle, the return of a nationalist party, with some caveats, to mainstream German politics was down to the machinations of Germany’s most brilliant and scheming politician of the last 20 years, Angela Merkel.

Merkel is to the rebirth of German nationalism what David Cameron was to Brexit, a vital yet unwitting cog in the historical machine. When it comes to the great trends of history, it can truly be said that all mills ultimately grind our corn. We should never be surprised by this, but always take it in our stride.

All this and brains too.

The most cunning politicians of Normiespace – the Camerons and Merkels – have no alternative but to ultimately be our “useful idiots.” There are remarkable similarities between the two. Both came from the center – or “cuckservative” – right, both moved in hard to the political center and even the soft left, and both unwittingly unleashed forces that the establishment of either country had counted on keeping locked up. And all because they were too clever for their own good.

In order to gain or keep power, they moved their parties sharply Left in the smug assurance that their Right flanks were totally secure, anchored by the no-platforming techniques, fear-mongering, and guilt-tripping that the Leftist metapolitical hegemony had imposed. Yes, the Left, by conspiring to deny voters a true right-wing alternative allowed these center-right parties to effortlessly swing Left and park their panzers on the Leftist lawn. That is why Labour was thrown out of power in 2010 and why the SPD hasn’t been in power for 12 long years.

Cameron and Merkel believed they could take their more patriotic, conservative, and – in the case of Britain – eurosceptic voters for granted, in the assurance that no one else would be able to exploit that space. Initially, they were correct in that calculation. What were their more right-wing voters supposed to do? Vote for the “evil parties,” the tattooed “knuckle-draggers” who had been demonized by the leftist dominated media?

This is what led Cameron to offer up gay marriage to hipster centrists, do little to reverse or even stem the inflow of mass migration, and acquiesce in the growth of the EU superstate.

This is what allowed Merkel to erase the harsh image she had gained by sticking it to the improvident Greeks in her Pan-European Empire, by showing her unexpected “motherly” side with the immigrants.

Photobombing done right?

It may be strange, looking at all the rapes and other chaos caused by her decision, but her absurd action in opening up the border to Syrian refugees and anyone else from the Third World, was actually popular at the time, especially with those voters she was contesting with her main opposition the center-left SPD.

As things got worse, as costs skyrocketed along with the rapes, as police searches for people of “Southern appearance” became ubiquitous, there was even a gruesome silver lining in all this chaos for Merkel, because she could then move back to the “law and order” right, where her leftist opposition could not follow her. Not enough to fix the problem, of course, but just enough to be more appealing to those worried centrist voters and soft Leftists. The SPD, hamstrung by its inherent leftism and its history of signaling like a doormat on migrant issues, couldn’t even attack Merkel for creating the problem in the first place. Looked at cynically, this was one of the most brilliant maneuvers of Merkel the Politician.

The German voter was thus left with the choice of continuing to support Merkel, throw away their vote on a demonized nationalist alternative, or opt for Leftist parties they knew would make the situation even worse. Indeed, without the migrant crisis, it could even be speculated that German voters might have been a lot more willing to entertain a change of leadership by giving the election to the SPD.

There is something about Merkel that makes you want to dismiss her as a drab, fusty old woman of mediocre intelligence and misplaced maternal drives, but the objective facts – a stranglehold on the Chancellorship since 2005 by a woman of limited natural appeal – suggest that rather than Donald Trump, who now seems painted into a corner, it is Merkel who has been the master of 4D chess. So, it is clearly not impossible that she knew all along that bringing the migrants into the country would first enable her to win over those centrist and soft Left voters who found fault with her sternness towards the Greeks, and, secondly, create a situation in which the only realistic mainstream option to deal with the crisis was to trust the woman who had created it.

But, as with Cameron over Brexit – a clever move to contain the threat posed by UKIP that managed to blow up in his face – tactical brilliance has had a price to pay. One could almost see here a Faustian bargain. Merkel has been smart, a little too smart, in fact excessively smart to the point where that smartness has marched all the way around the block and booted her up the arse, so that she has become the tool to effectively betray the system of which she has been a part, a system whose foundation lies in the denial of German identity and German interests, a system that sought to stifle the natural, healthy existential urges of the German people, in short, a system that needed betraying in every way possible.

She has succeeded in opening the door that the system was predicated on keeping locked and closed. After 70 years in the wilderness, German nationalism is finally back. Let’s hope it wipes its shoes and behaves itself a bit better this time.

Comment

105 comments

  1. Goolag Sucks 9 October, 2017 at 17:51 Reply

    If Frau Merkel gets the AFD into the number 2 spot next election and 20-25% of the overall vote I’m glad she won

  2. Stormer 27 September, 2017 at 12:17 Reply

    I could agree on some aspects of this article, namely this cuckservatice shift to the left and left losing monopoly over some things it is considered theirs.

  3. Nova Morium 26 September, 2017 at 17:58 Reply

    The White British elect the CHILDLESS Theresa May as their Leader…….

    The White Germans elect the CHILDLESS Angela Merkel as their Leader REPETITIVELY…….

    There’s something wrong with Old Europe…….

  4. Nova Morium 26 September, 2017 at 17:56 Reply

    The Strongest Germans……

    German-Americans…….

    Would NEVER elect Angela Merkel repetitively…….

    Even AFTER she allowed a Million Non-White Migrants in in ONE YEAR………

    We wouldn’t even elect Hillary Clinton……

    There’s something wrong with you Europeans across the Waters……

    Get your Act Together……

  5. Maple Curtain 26 September, 2017 at 16:57 Reply

    “German nationalism is finally back. Let’s hope it wipes its shoes and behaves itself a bit better this time.”

    Oh (((Colin))), do tell.

  6. Scott Schroeder 25 September, 2017 at 18:57 Reply

    If past behavior of a particular ideology abnegates their right to engage in politics, then Communism which murdered tens of millions in peacetime and turned whole countries into prison camps that shot escapees needs to be banned.

    • Nova Morium 25 September, 2017 at 19:15 Reply

      What if there was a White European Country……..

      100% Ethnic European…..

      100%…….

      100% Stringent Border Control……….

      No Migrant Laborers allowed…….

      Predatory Capitalism was Barred……..

      Foreign Investment was Barred…….

      All Capital gained had to be Reinvested into the Country…….

      High Taxes on the Ultra-Rich…….

      Some Tax Revenue was invested into a Organic Military Industrial Complex……

      For Self-Defense……

      Some Tax Revenue was invested into Families to maintain Healthy Birth Rates……..

      Some Tax Revenue was invested into a Universal Health Care System for only those Ethnic Europeans……

      Some Tax Revenue was invested into an Education System that located, fertilized, and bred the Strongest/Finest Minds…….

      Societal/Class Structures were constantly reexamined, adjusted, and supplemented to maintain Fluidity……..

      Societal/Class Structures were constantly reexamined, adjusted, and corrected to maintain a Healthy Ethnocentric National Identity…….

      There was a Healthy Welfare System which was not based upon Dependency but Temporal Rehabilitation/Support……..

      The Society was established with full knowledge of Inequality from Birth……

      But, with a Humble Deference to Ignorance regarding Totality of Knowledge……..

      But, the State/Nation was undergirded at the CORE with an Ethnocentric Love for its People…….

      Could this work??

      Or would Natural Egoic Human Competitiveness, Selfishness, Greed, Sloth, and Corruption…….

      …..Destroy it rather Quickly??…..

      • crediThor 26 September, 2017 at 08:32 Reply

        Quite the question, right? Well imagine having been beaten with Holocaustianity by media from day one, from age 11 in school, while your ancestors actually are not the “liberators” as with Americans and Anglos, but the culprits.
        You guys outside have no idea how strong the grip of the tribe is on this matter in germany. So the way out of guilt to german men is to give the country away, thereby finally absolving them from their “ethnic ideas”. To give Germany away is their method to absolve themselves from the guilt of WW2 and Holo.
        They can only prove to be no nazis by giving it away, that’s the mental situation here.

  7. Demography is Destiny 25 September, 2017 at 12:22 Reply

    That’s what Hegel called “List der Vernunft” or “List der Geschichte” – hopefully you are right.

  8. Halford Mackinder 25 September, 2017 at 11:48 Reply

    Collin is a big ZERO in my book. He spends half of his time attacking the “Nazi LARPers” that comprise the Alt Right, and then he spends the other half ripping off their memes and trying to benefit from their work. Whatever Collin’s actual beliefs are don’t matter, the way he conducts himself proves he is dishonest and that’s all I need to know. The Alt Right likes honesty, consistency and humility. Collin has none of them. That is why Andrew Anglin is near-universally respected in the AR and cucky Collin is near-universally reviled. Let’s not forget: as recently as last year, Collin published an article on his obscure blog (that is still coasting on Spencer’s reputation) that the German nation should be physically eliminated. He advocated – in 2016! – that Germany be broken up along the lines outlined by the Jews Henry Morganthau and Theodore Kaufmann. Collin is a disgrace to white people (which is why he has chosen not to live around them) and that this website still supports him after his endless attacks on the Alt Right as “Nazis” is demoralizing.

  9. Scott Schroeder 25 September, 2017 at 10:19 Reply

    If your main goal is to implement the Kalergi plan and turn Europe non-white, you don’t care about left or right. If you demand to import misogynist Muslims who throw gays from rooftops you don’t really care about “progressive” values.

    Anti-whites received 87% of the vote. Us sane people look at Germany and say “How could ANY white German vote for Merkel or any of the other anti-white parties?” To keep 87% of the vote with what’s happening in Germany, I say anti-whites must be doing a BRILLIANT job. It helps that their opposition has no clue what to say when called racist, Nazi, xenophobe, etc.

  10. Marathon-Youth 25 September, 2017 at 10:06 Reply

    I have another “share experience”. Today in “The American Thinker” is an article titled “Germany re-elects Merkel, but hands huge gains to ‘far right’ party”. It is about the phenomenal rise of the right and the fear of European Jews: My comments:

    “Jewish groups in Europe and the United States expressed alarm on Sunday at the far-right Alternative for Germany’s success in Germany’s parliamentary election and urged other parties not to form an alliance with the AfD”
    Why the alarm? Why would European Jews be alarmed of Germans wanting strong borders and an end to Muslim migration? Germans are highly controlled especially on the issue of Nazism. Why the fear?
    As for the definition of a “Nazi” that is enshrined by the Jewish version of history to the point that the monstrous caricature created by the Jewish narrative is bought hook line and sinker by “neo” nazis who do not have a clue to modern day Jews who are terrified of the “Frankenstein’ image they had created.
    One of the pathos of world war two is the distortion in order to create an image. The myth became more important than facts. It served post world war Jews well. Outside of the birth of Israel the wealth and power of the Jewish community saw no parallel in history. The bad side is that they along with the rest get to live with a monstrous take on Nazi Germany.”

    and

    “For my own edification:
    History is not a strong point with Americans. Not our own history and certainly not the history of other nations. But when it comes to Nazi Germany few Americans are ignorant of this chapter. Most I have spoken to or chatted with on the internet become highly emotional.. on this chapter of world history.. but nothing else. Not on any other aspects of death and pain. Not here, not about our own civil war but only about Nazi Germany have I seen so much passion shown by Americans.

    That tells me that those in power (Jews) have managed to indoctrinate this aspect of history far more than 6 thousand years of human history spanning the globe. When so much effort goes to convince generation after generation of only one thin slice of history that spanned less than 25 years not only distortion sets in but extreme emotion.
    The rudimentary aspects of facts, logic, common sense, open debate are driven out…when it comes to this part of history”

    • Marathon-Youth 25 September, 2017 at 10:08 Reply

      Neo Nazis’ concept of Germany is so warped that a the clean cut family oriented German Nazi image which defined 1940’s Germany has been removed by the Jewish narrative.

  11. German-American 25 September, 2017 at 07:44 Reply

    Classic anti-German Liddell smugness in that last line about “behaving”… why is this self-important dilettante writing for Alt Right.com? British arrogance vis-a-vis Germany already cost us two worlds wars and brought a thousand years of European greatness crashing down. We don’t need any more of it, thank you very much.

    • Liddell 25 September, 2017 at 07:49 Reply

      How is being pleased that the Germans are waking up to a sense of national identity anti-German smugness? I detect some anti-Liddell stupidity on your part.

    • Durfee House 25 September, 2017 at 09:37 Reply

      I noticed that too. Cool it with the third Reich bashing bro. Hitler’s and Germany’s greatest crime was losing the war.

      • Liddell 25 September, 2017 at 09:48 Reply

        OK, you have no problem with Hitler’s well known plans to ethnically cleanse large areas of Eastern Europe and enslave the Slavs. Thanks for letting us know.

        • jayvbellis 25 September, 2017 at 09:57 Reply

          Volga Germans in Russia got ethnically cleansed from prosperous lands they lived for hundreds of years.

          Germans in Danzig totally ethnically cleansed. Yes Hitler and especially the SS should have got so much more Slavic support – they did get some from Croatians and Ukrainians. The big mystery was why Germans didn’t t get support from their Anglo Saxon and Norman British cousins?

          Only a complete British fool now things World War I and World War II benefitted the British side. My God man – just look and smell Londonstan and Rotherham England.

          • curri 27 September, 2017 at 07:46

            Because post-war Britain came under the dominance of Harvard and Hollywood and also those guys who came up with “The Authoritarian Personality” doctrine for making the West more “tolerant.” But things got out of hand and Adorno (at least) in 1968 came to regret what he had helped bring about. I guess you know Paul Gottfried’s position on the widespread and malign influence of TAP since he’s written so much about it.

          • Stormer 27 September, 2017 at 08:32

            But also why do you think those wars necessarily caused Rotherham?

            (Ethno)nationalism is bad. Oswald Mosley is evil and fascist. Enoch Powell is evil and racist right-winger, whatnot.

            That’s how.

            Anyway,

          • Liddell 27 September, 2017 at 19:07

            You obviously have zero understanding of the word “necessarily” and causation in general. The state we have today arises out of multiple factors and not just because Hitler threw a shit test that got kerb stomped by three superpowers.

          • Stormer 28 September, 2017 at 14:16

            The state we have today arises out of multiple factors and not just because Hitler threw a shit test that got kerb stomped by three superpowers.

            Of course.

        • Marathon-Youth 25 September, 2017 at 10:15 Reply

          You are also aware of the ‘well known’ aspects of the following:
          -Nazi Germany’s military was the most diverse with over 30 nationals represented including Africans and Asians. 150 thousand German Jews served in this military (not the British army whose soldiers came from her Empire-Germany’s soldiers came from alliances)
          -The massacre of 58 thousand Germans was one of the main reasons Germany invaded Poland
          -The number claimed of 6 million killed was marked down in 1989. Auschwitz which claimed 4 million went down to 500 thousand.
          -Red Cross which visited all the camps during the War was never asked to be witness during the Nuremberg Trials.
          much more.

          • Liddell 25 September, 2017 at 10:50

            All those are well worn tropes, crinkled and greased by being passed around for years.

            So, are you saying that Hitler actually wanted Jews to serve in the military, and that he decided to ethnically cleanse most of E. Europe merely because of the supposed massacre of Germans in Poland? Are you therefore implying that his grand scheme of demographic transformation was just a petty act of vengeance?

          • curri 27 September, 2017 at 08:20

            But Hitler met with Molotov in Nov 1940 to try to get the Sovs to become full members of the Axis. Britain wouldn’t come to terms and he sensibly assumed that Churchill would eventually get his wish and the US would enter the war. US was the industrial giant plus the Nazi Empire had nothing remotely comparable to the Texas oilfields or the Midwestern Breadbasket. He made the decision to invade the USSR only after the Molotov gambit failed. AJP Taylor said that AH was more of a flexible opportunist than is normally credited.

            A lot of interesting details here:
            http://www.fpp.co.uk/books/Hitler/1977/html_chapter/10.html

            The Russian debacle could have been avoided (apparently) if the Italians had been less inept.

          • Newfoundlander 27 September, 2017 at 18:02

            ‘-Nazi Germany’s military was the most diverse with over 30 nationals represented including Africans and Asians. 150 thousand German Jews served in this military ( the British army’s soldiers came from her Empire-Germany’s soldiers came from alliances)’

            And you think this is a good thing? Are you serious? You are for Hitler and desegregation (at least in the military).

        • Durfee House 25 September, 2017 at 10:52 Reply

          In Russia they have a rather revisionist view of WWII. I talked with a lot of Russians about WWII in 1995. They don’t see the Third Reich Germans as the bad guys any more, quite simple, the May Day Parade notwithstanding. The May Day Parade is more about Russian pride but there is absolutely no Third Reich bashing in it.

        • Halford Mackinder 25 September, 2017 at 11:50 Reply

          You’re a faggot Liddell and you are universally hated by the American Alt Right. The only reason you still have a platform in the Alt Right is that certain sefl-styled “leaders” feel bad for you out of some misplaced sense of loyalty. You’re a scum bag a lot of us would like you see you on a spike. Stay away from the US you limey faggot.

        • Clark Kent 25 September, 2017 at 11:52 Reply

          You just aren’t going to convince a significant portion of the Altright to think negatively about Hitler when we’re still under the control of ZOG. Just gotta deal with it.

          • Liddell 25 September, 2017 at 11:58

            Bollocks. Hitler has plenty of negatives for WN. Just ask AfD who somehow forgot to put him on any of their posters.

          • Clark Kent 25 September, 2017 at 12:03

            Just because the majority of Germans think Hitler was bad and mass-immigration is good doesn’t make it true.
            Once Germans become real minorities in their own homeland, you’ll see the last few proud German men Seig Heiling in the streets with tears in their eyes.

          • Stormer 27 September, 2017 at 08:42

            No, the fact that he wanted to treat most of Europe worse than an African colony makes it true.

            Proof or GTFO.

        • Stormer 27 September, 2017 at 08:21 Reply

          OK, you have no problem with Hitler’s well known plans to ethnically cleanse large areas of Eastern Europe and enslave the Slavs.

          You mean like, when Eastern Slavs, Russians (“Soviets”) commies/bloshebiks enslaved and killed millions of Ukranians with push of Jew commie inteligentsia?

          Yeah right. And you have a nerve to patronize alt-right or bashing Andrew Anglin. Pathetic cuck.

          • Newfoundlander 27 September, 2017 at 18:06

            Actually, Hitler tried to destroy Poland, which was a very anti-Semitic and anti-communist country. Prehaps if he hadn’t been so brutal, and hadn’t been anti-Slavic, he could have aligned with them. Poland would have made an excellent ally against Judeo-Bolshevism, but instead Hitler attacked Poland because ‘muh lebensraum’.

            Also, you seem to be implying that the Holodomor was carried out by Russians. I would have expected someone who goes by the username ‘Stormer’ to be more woke on the JQ.

    • WHAT 25 September, 2017 at 19:55 Reply

      >British arrogance

      Oh jesus fuck, as much as I dislike eternal anglo, this bullshit has to stop. Countries don`t act like people, countries don`t have emotions, they have strategic imperatives instead. British strategic imperative from the Thirty Years’ War onwards was, and forever will be, to deny hegemony in the continental Europe, whomever the hegemon. France, Germany, Spain, doesn`t matter, it can be fucking Lichtenstein even. Caliph of Britanistan will be plotting against caliph of Germanistan if he manages to subdue the whole of Central Europe, just like anglo did.

      Napoleon was talking about this when he said that geography might as well be a court sentence for the countries, Bismark for his whole time in office was literally walking the edge of a knife in service of this principle, left Germany much stronger than he got it, and then nazis had to screw it all up. Holy Hitler is not so holy if you just increase the timescale.

      • Stormer 27 September, 2017 at 08:38 Reply

        First, there is no such thing as “nazi”, it is Nazi-Sozi or National-Socialist. Nazi means Nationalist, how Germans pronounce NATIonalism as NATZEE-onalizmus.

        Second, if “nazis” screwed something, Allies screwed it big time, otherwise, white nations would not be in this multiracial turd world immigration mess now.

    • Max Triggers 25 September, 2017 at 19:57 Reply

      Isn’t this the guy that got cyber-curb stomped when he attacked DS and Andre Wanglin? He had some serious butt-hurt over that if I remember correctly.

      I really don’t know who he is nor do I care. However, I am certainly against bashing Germans in any form.

    • Newfoundlander 27 September, 2017 at 18:47 Reply

      Have you considered than maybe he just wants them to win this time? It was Hitler’s expansionism and anti-Slavism that greatly hindered him in the East.

  12. Tonton Macoute 25 September, 2017 at 07:08 Reply

    Liddel obviously understands very little about German politics or even Germany in general, so he has to base his “analysis” on movie stereotypes and Hollywood Nazism. Perhaps he should rahter write about Japan.

  13. John McKenna 25 September, 2017 at 05:54 Reply

    Mariano Rajoy has done the same with Catalonian seperatism purely out of his attempts to undermine Catalan identity. As a movement it was dead and he resuscitated.

    • Patriotic American 25 September, 2017 at 05:55 Reply

      Yes, he should’ve have stopped bullying them. It is shameful how that Jewified mongoloid behaved towards them.

  14. Dragdar 25 September, 2017 at 05:34 Reply

    The commie SPD simply couldn’t attack her for the problems she caused, which are the policies cut from their own cloth, which she caused only to present herself as the reasonable solution. The right parties are created and/or infiltrated by the Occupational Gov. in order to fracture the grassroots populist spectrum, paint them as absurd, unthinkable or simply votes ‘thrown away’. She is the definition of a psychopath career politician modernity gave birth to. Right in the line of the famous Chancellor and mason Bismarck. This way she and her party takes up and occupies the most Lebensraum in the political spectrum like squids with tentacles spreading to all sides, today here, tomorrow there. Only put enough space and empty argument between movements to avoid being called out a blatant hypocrite.
    We’re talking about a woman who has armies of scout-bureaucrats the same way CEOs have financial analysts and prognoses, she watches her ratings like a hawk and is constantly responding, no policy is hers except that which aims to keep her in power in collusion with media outlets and oligarchy, she seems to have no conviction of her own except that blind obedience to the self-perpetuating technocratic machine in which her actions translate to projections in polls and image management in the press.

    >Hitler’s 12 years as Chancellor saw nationalism expunged from German politics
    Though this is supposed to imply Hitler’s fall caused the fall of GN let’s all remember now that Hitler himself eventually noted the scope and limit of German Nationalism, that GN was to gradually move aside. Every materialist dialectic eventually eats itself up, without Doctrine&Dogma one stage in the revolution gives way to another. You can’t turn the state into a religion and expect this to stand, it’s doomed from the beginning. The Monarch overthrows the Pope, the Chancellor overthrows the Monarch, The F˜ührer overthrows the Chancellor, the President overthrows the the F˜ührer, the Technocrat overthrows the President, the Environmentalist overthrows the Technocrat, the Humanist overthrows the Environmentalist… until it all rolls down to the anti-Christ.

  15. genocidal_maniac 25 September, 2017 at 03:54 Reply

    Merkel’s refugee decision came because a few weeks before she made some Palestinian girl cry. And because of her Lutheran upbringing.

    She has endorsed a burqua ban to try and get more support. Burquas are a legit security issue, but an outright ban is extreme. Kind of pandering there.

    Syrians actually are relatively moderate. Lots of reports of Syrians being like why is this German mosque so shtty and identity politics left?

    The real problem is Saudi money. All of those Washington DC fggts who virtue signal and virtue shame about “islamophobia” do so because they receive money from the gulf states. When ordinary Americans who see the destruction and aggressiveness of Islam, but not the money, you see the bought off Washington elites freak out.

    • Patriotic American 25 September, 2017 at 06:31 Reply

      “The real problem is Saudi money.” – The Saudis are Jews, they openly admitted it decades ago, so when you understand that reality it becomes more and more clear that the real issue is the Jews. Anyone who has studied Islam closely and isn’t a total moron can see that Islam is just Judaism + one extra prophet, who was more than likely a Jew given his habit of constantly quoting Talmudic tractates when asked about religious laws, basing his ‘sharia’ on Jewish ‘Beth Din’, his invitation to serve as a religious judge by a Jewish tribe, his 10+ Jewish wives, his occupation as a merchant, his appointing a Jew as his first Caliph, etc. It is also of note that a great many Orthodox Jewish Rabbis are now claiming that their Messiah will either be a Moslem or is the same person as the Islamic Mahdi, which is highly suspect. Basically Islam is just another tool that the Jews use to enslave the rest of humanity. Once we deal with the Jews Islam will fall apart quickly.


      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jpda2RflZJg

      Here are some sleazy Jews promoting these ideas so they can dupe the ‘stupid goyim’.

  16. European Particularist 25 September, 2017 at 03:10 Reply

    Merkel is fairly one-dimensional. She does not play games, let alone 4d chess.

    She just gets up infront of whatever the emerging trends or consensus is. She has good judgement about where the wind is blowing. (Unlike Hillary). Once Merkel has identified a new cause, she declares it to be “without alternative” and goes full steam ahead. Dissenters and naysayers are thrown over board. The opposition is steamrolled with political issues they themselves endorsed in the past and heckled Merkel about.

    Merkel does occasionally change course, even by 180 degrees and very drastically, if she can rationalize her shift as a response to new, unforseen events or circumstances, so that her previous actions are not delegitimized. Rinse, repeat. Her power grows at every turn.

    Demography is destiny. Merkel dealt a major, historic and potentially fatal blow to the German people. In return a small party emerged that is no more nationalist than Merkel herself was 15 years ago. That’s not a win for us. It is a huge setback.

    Our ideas were already spreading prior the the refugee crisis and there was enough of a growing third world population in Europe. We did not need any further evidence to make our case.

      • European Particularist 25 September, 2017 at 06:37 Reply

        Merkel is the extreme opposite of a psychopath.

        Psychopaths have no regard for societal norms, values and laws. Merkel has no independent mind outside of those norms and enforces these norms.

        All western moral and ideological frameworks that are part of acceptable discourse necessitate completely open borders, world government and welfare for everybody. Contemporary christianity, egalitarianism, liberalism, progressivism, neoliberalism and even conservativism resolve in the same conclusion. All humans are biologically equal and have equal rights. We are obliged to help the poor out of solidarity and christian grace. Free markets require free movement of labor. The laws and rights of immigrants that are already on the books prevent effective and permanent border control, precludes all deportation and exclusion from the welfare state. So even the law-abiding conservative has no other choice.

        The anti-immigrant parties are themselves trapped in these frameworks and formulate weak and defensive arguments based on them.

        • Riopel 25 September, 2017 at 08:57 Reply

          “Psychopaths have no regard for societal norms, values and laws.”

          Yes and that perfectly describes Merkel, who ordered police to not arrest Muslims who rape and assault Germans. A psychopath is someone who has no empathy and goes out of their way to harm people for their own benefit. They can easily play the role of a normie, like Ted Bundy and most serial killers. Merkel does it too by pretending to be a humanitarian while she knows full well that she has turned Germany into a slaughterhouse.

          • European Particularist 25 September, 2017 at 10:28

            Those muslims were embodied by Alan Kurdi, the beached kid. They were seen as poor, traumatized war refugees. Bishops said that to reject refugees is to reject Jesus. So the Muslims were perceived as the second coming of Christ. It was a moral panic and Merkel as a deeply moral, pro-social and christian person embraced it.

            In fact, even the old alternativeright.com jumped on board with an embarrassing pro-regugee article that has been scrubbed from the archives.
            My response on disqus survived: http://disq.us/p/eg511d

            Merkel did not change anything about the German criminal justice system or the immigration system. Rapists are non-punished with the full leniency that has been the norm in Germany and much of Europe since the 68 “march through the institutions” by new left radicals.

            Both european and german law and supreme court decisions preclude the deportation to a number of unsafe countries, including Hungary and Greece or to countries that just won’t take them back. The state is not permited to deport anybody with certain – easily faked – mental or medical conditions or anybody who’s identity can’t be established (hence the universal loss of passports). Anybody who is present in Germany is entitled to some form of welfare. Asylum, once granted can’t be rechecked and revoked for fraudulent claims, etc.
            All of these laws and legal precedents existed prior to Merkel’s invitation.

          • Riopel 25 September, 2017 at 10:34

            Merkel literally invited the invaders, and she has used her power to cover up their crimes. You do know that rape and murder are still technically illegal in Germany, right? That doesn’t stop Merkel from bringing more rapist and murderers in while ruthlessly crushing any resistance to it.

            She’s a former Stasi agent and there’s video footage of her tossing Germany’s flag away when it’s handed to her at some kind of political event. It doesn’t matter that the treason didn’t start with her. She has ramped it up to eleven and openly sided with the enemies of Germany, with the intent of ultimately destroying it, and all of Europe in the end.

            So yes, she’s a psychopath.

          • European Particularist 25 September, 2017 at 11:28

            Immigrant crimes have always been covered up in Germany. Rape, battery and murder are technically illegal, but the criminals just get short, probationary sentences. The judges are to blame. Police don’t release mug shots or camera footage, except in rare cases. Names and ethnic backgrounds are not mentioned.

            The criminal justice system in the USA is exceptionally transparent. That is not the case in Europe and it has always been this way, even before mass immigration. France does not even have statistics.

            Merkel was a leader in the Free German Youth movement, not the Stasi. So were most of kids of her generation including surely many of the east german AFD members who came of age in the GDR. The GDR was literally national socialist and ex-Stasi and old GDR holdovers are not known to be bleeding heart progressives. Many east german “Die Linke” (The Left) voters now support AFD.

            The USA is also exceptional in its religious devotion to the flag, including the taboo against the flag touching the ground. This does not exist in much of Europe. Germany is exceptional in that the flag is considered to be boorish. Merkel did not like the optics. Most Germans are not bothered by her flag tossing.

            Don’t get me wrong. Merkel is to blame for her manic accelerationism. But the suicidal absurdity of Western Europe is not her invention. I am not against scapegoating her either, if it is politicallly useful, so she can be thrown under the bus and the open borders policies with her.
            But we should have inner party knowledge about actual cause and effect.

          • Dragdar 25 September, 2017 at 10:40

            Humanism is a sect of psychopaths. It’s man-worship (the psychopath worships himself) and earth-worship.

        • Einar von Vielen 25 September, 2017 at 08:58 Reply

          I am not completely with you: To my view you are describing the characteristics of an autist, i.e. somebody without sense for social signals. Merkel in my opnion is a true psychopath as to my knowledge psychopaths do extremely understand how the social environment works. However they have no own positive emotions and do not care about other people’s disadvantages. Psychpaths frequently know how to pretend they are empathic while they are the contrary. Just look at psychopath who gain trust of people just for the sake of injuring them later.

    • Patriotic American 25 September, 2017 at 06:01 Reply

      I agree to an extent, but we must realize that her actions will radicalize millions of millennials and gen Zers and the generation that comes next and that is a huge favor to us. Some of those people can’t vote yet and are not yet old enough to have any real political opinions but when they grow older you will see the truth. They will grow up being bullied and targeted by foreigners in their own fatherland and this will force them to become hard and ruthless in many ways and will give them an enduring hatred of the filth that caused their problems and the ‘people’ who are persecuting them.

      • European Particularist 25 September, 2017 at 07:04 Reply

        Demographic accelerationism has not worked in the US or Europe. Blacks took over Detroit and other cities. They bully, rob, kill and rape whites at a regular basis. And all of this only caused white flight, even though whites could stop this immideately by just enforcing freedom of association.

        European nationalists have hoped and predicted that people will eventually wake up for decades, but that never happened even though the current state of affairs is orders of magnitude worse than what anybody expected. Alex Kurtagic gave a good speech on the subject a couple of years back.

  17. Charley Howard 25 September, 2017 at 02:23 Reply

    I don’t believe I’ve ever seen a more disgusting spin on the story as what was presented in this article. You act like the rise of Merkel is some type of ‘gift’ that can be cleverly exploited to allow the reestablishment of German and European hegemony. What the hell is wrong with everybody these days?

    What has to be done, must be done is the violent overthrow of all these European Union stooges who are in the pocket of Jews and leftist throughout the world and wish only to destroy white individuals everywhere. Can’t you all see that clearly?

    There can be no reprieve by playing clever chess moves and hoping we ‘manipulate’ our way out of this political mess. Ultimately is going to come to Civil War and the sooner the better, or otherwise there won’t be anybody left to fight. Racial separation is the ONLY WAY of achieving some degree of salvation from this Jewish multiculturalism, which is threatening to destroy us and at the end the entire world. The people who write these articles on this blog don’t seem to stress the extreme emergency that we are now seeing worldwide.

    What’s going to happen is that you will continue to lollygag around getting your percentages up while your population is biologically compromised. You’re waiting for a political solution, which I believe will never ever come.

        • crediThor 26 September, 2017 at 06:22 Reply

          Good article from someone outside Germany, really. You sensed that Merkel is the 4d chess actor here. As a background, Merkel was in school prominent for exceptional achievements in Mathematics and winning Russian language olympics up to the country level. She closed her school time with the best grade overall possible of 1,0. Then she worked and studied, finishing with a PH D in “Natural sciences” on radioactive decay based on quantum mechanic statistics with “magna cum laude”. So her IQ has to be exceptional.
          She plays the “Mutti”, as she is called. She hides her intelligence, appears “normal”, avoids controversy, but when cornered reveals serious verbal and intellectual powerlevel. She erased all competitors in her party over the years, has all of Germany in check. Quite the accomplishment.

    • Ganton 25 September, 2017 at 05:08 Reply

      Why do you think it’s more likely that we’ll be able to start civil/race wars than we’ll be able to win some elections?

      Since nothing is happening on the “civil war” front, I’m gonna focus my attention on what actually is happening since it seems a lot more likely to me that the AfD or Sweden Democrats will succeed in turning back the demographic transformations of Europe than some civil war being not just begun but successful in toppling major European governments.

      • crediThor 26 September, 2017 at 05:34 Reply

        AfD would not turn back anything. They are pro-immigration, if the immigrants serve the economy. They would just bring in less than now and smarter people. It amounts to cosmetics. We have neither a chance with parties, since they are all infiltrated and turned useful or broken up the state agents. The other scenario of a civil war is far away. But it’s there. When the baby boomers retire in germany, the economy will dip because of lack of people to replace them. They want to import the replacement for the last boomers now, but you cannot run nuclear power plants and BASF and high tech with africans. So when this demographic dip will come in about 8 to 12 years, we need to have in place: communiies, loyal groups, preparations even parties etc. Before that we have little chance at power in Germany and anywhere. We need not rely on parties and prepare ourselves by forging real life alliances, growing our numbers to optimal strength, solidify. Actually AfD is already splitting apart, since Frauke Petry, head of the party, declared she leaves the fraction of AfD in parliamanet because her colleagues are not what she likes to work with. State infiltration is the best weapon of “democratic” countries to neutralize new parties. It happens every single time. They neutralized the NPD with infiltration and AfD may just be the next case. Suffice to say that all “right” wing parties in europe are forced by jewry to work against “ethnic” nationalism and “antisemitism”. Infiltrator on how he killed the BNP:

    • Patriotic American 25 September, 2017 at 06:05 Reply

      The point is that Merkel’s actions will radicalize Germans and most of the centrists and rightists will swing hard right and end up becoming fashy sh!tlords

      “Ultimately is going to come to Civil War” – I agree and that is why we want idiots like Merkel to radicalize and harden the youth with their actions. The more extreme her persecutions and betrayals become the more they will be pushed into our arms and become fanatical in their resolve to fight for the honor and rights of Aryans.

  18. Trond Davidsen 25 September, 2017 at 01:38 Reply

    The same thing is going on in Sweden. The right wing party Sverige Demokratene now have some 24 percentage support, and giving the situation in the nation, it is likely to increase towards the election next year.

    • Logician 25 September, 2017 at 22:03 Reply

      ‘Blut und Boden’ was originally the rallying-cry of Bismarck, the great C19 unifier and father of modern Germany … the New Right have just re-discovered it. In that sense it’s all to the good, because Bismarck was pre- the two World Wars by over half-a-century, and Germany in that period became a remarkable industrial and creative powerhouse … it was the dying, desperate gestures of the old imperial families which dragged Europe into WWI.

    • Will Coetzee 27 September, 2017 at 20:09 Reply

      What’s with the alt-right’s grudge towards ‘consumerism’? Genuinely interested. Do you agree with Lennon’s view of a world with ‘no possessions’? Don’t you view advancements in technology as a good thing for the White race?

      • Andrea Ostrov Letania 30 September, 2017 at 02:13 Reply

        By consumerism, we mean crass materialism.

        Of course, consumer economy is good in the sense of making available stuff like cars, stereo, TV, clothes, and etc. We need products and services. So, that part of capitalist economy is good.

        By ‘consumerism’, we mean a way of life and a cultural attitude that revolves around buying things we don’t need, addiction to fads and fashions, impatience for deeper culture and roots, a disposable attitude toward heritage, and etc.

        Consumerism emphasizes the here and now, and the ‘cool’. It sneers at anything that is ‘old-fashioned’. Consumerism created a culture of amnesia, so Americans don’t care when monuments to Old Americans are pulled down.

        Also, the culture is so pop-oriented now, and fewer people read books and partake of classical music that require concentration and depth.

        So, we are not opposed to consumer products and services. We are opposed to fad-and-fashion mentality of consumerism where the latest version of ‘cool’ is all that matters.

  19. Diversity Heretic 25 September, 2017 at 01:08 Reply

    It will be interesting to see how Merkel tries to form a coalition, since she rules out dealing with AfD. Some of the Greens have substantial immigration concerns and their anti-diesel initiatives could be a problem for an industrial economy. My prediction is a Grand Coalition between the CDU/CSU and the SPD. They’re most comfortable with each other.

    How is the CSU in Bavaria dealing with this? Up until the arrival of AfD, they were the most “oonservative” of the German parties. AfD doesn’t seem particularly strong in Bavaria, however.

      • Diversity Heretic 25 September, 2017 at 02:53 Reply

        Thanks, I saw some more detailed statistics that broke out the CSU vote. Although I think it unlikely, I wonder if there is any sentiment in Bavaria for some kind of a rapprochement between the CSU and AfD. Doubt it, but I’ve read that a lot of Bavarians are unhappy with Merkel’s refugee policies.

    • Krafty Wurker 25 September, 2017 at 07:50 Reply

      The Roman Catholic CDU/CSU lost some votes, but, not enough to knock Frau Merkel out of power. The north German, and consequently, Protestant SPD lost the most votes, to the surging AfD and FPD.

      We tend to forget about the “free enterprise” FDP, but, whenever a major German politician makes a politically incorrect anti-Semitic statement it’s always a high ranking FDP member. Particularly an FDP member in the German military.

    • crediThor 26 September, 2017 at 06:03 Reply

      CSU in bavaria is terrified of the AfD, which took 12% in Bavaria and reduced the CSU from 49% in the last general election to 38% now. CSU faces a local election of Bavaria next year and is outright terrified and panicking because the AFD actually promotes the course the people there want: less immigration. The CSU is also terrified to face this local election while being in government with the Green party. In the Green party there is some heads who want to curb immigration, but they are viciously attacked by the base of the party, which is as pro-immigration as it gets in Germany. The other leaders of the party also support theoretically unlimited immigration.
      Now Seehofer from CSU, who made a fool out of himself by opposing Merkel without getting any result, has declared his “Immigration cap” is the condition to build a coalition. We’ll see how the Green party will go along with this. In the past they accused the CSU of enabling and backing AfD positions such as the “immigration cap” and now they themselves need to get along with it into government.

      What was apparent at the election evening as well: The FDP and the Green party attacked the SPD (social Dems) because they SDems declared they will not go into government with Merkel again, they choose opposition. SDems could form a governemnt with Merkel again by the numbers, but refuse it. And FDP and Greens attack them?! Why that?! Because FDP and Greens know full well, that their promises to their voters will be erased to big extent when entering a gov. with Merkel. So they will most likely in the next election suffer big losses. No one really wants to enter this new coalition. It’s hilarious. If CSU cucks too much to Merkel and the Greens, they will lose drastic amounts of voters to AFD in the future and if the Greens go harder against immigration like CSU demands, they will get fierce internal ruptures.

      FDP is the party who promised anything to their voters and cannot deliver at all, so they know if they pull in and do not deliver, they may be gone in the next election. They did this once and suffered bitterly from it. So this time they know what’s up.

      • Diversity Heretic 26 September, 2017 at 07:17 Reply

        Thanks for that informative comment! It looks like you’ve been paying attention! Can Merkel and the CDU/CSU govern as a mere plurality? It appears as if no one really wants to join a coalition with them.

        • crediThor 26 September, 2017 at 07:37 Reply

          Have to admit I don’t know about this possibility, we never had that.

          Most possibly the Greens and FDP will try to enter a coaltion, but both parties need to get the coaltion document voted on by their party base. My best bet is we will get this coalition, but there is quite a big chance it won’t materialize or last.