Perspective

The Alt-Right and the Homosexual Question — Part 1

“Men of our race naturally view with contempt the creatures who, though anatomically male, find a perverse and incomprehensible satisfaction in sexual relations with one another.” — Revilo P. Oliver

Also read: Part 2; Part 3.

Introduction

The following essay is quite long — much longer than I initially intended. The reason for this is that I soon discovered that, like the Jewish Question, the Homosexual Question does not lend itself easily to soundbites, quips, rhetorical flourishes, or short blog posts. It is not intended to be comprehensive, nor is it meant to fully explain what homosexuality is, or how it originates. This essay is intended to advance the position that homosexuals should be regarded as anathema to the Alt-Right, and to the broader White Nationalist movement.

I once previously involved myself in the comments section of AltRight.com, arguing against homosexual apologetics. The response was overwhelmingly supportive, but one or two homosexual malcontents made the following accusations: first, that I was involving myself in a dispute between the editors of AltRight.com and Counter-Currents publishing; second, that I was evidently a repressed homosexual; and third, that this was somehow an attempt to boost my personal status. On the first point, I am not invested personally in the debate between AltRight.com and Counter-Currents publishing, but almost two years ago (long before the dispute) I was writing against homosexual apologetics and offered counter-arguments to at least one Counter Currents author. I deal with the bankrupt rationale behind the second accusation in the course of the essay. On the third point, my aspiration to personal status is necessarily limited by my anonymity. I aspire neither to ‘status’ nor to leadership. I am aware of the limitations of my position, and only wish to advance an argument. That such an argument might damage the credibility of others may be considered the primary reason behind accusations against me personally in this regard. Tackling this issue is likely to be largely thankless, and certainly controversial. My status may well have been better served by “sticking to the Jews,’ but as stated, status is not my objective.

This essay will not be “the last word” on the subject, but it is likely to be my last word on it.

Silencing Tactics

Within the Alt-Right, the subject of homosexuality, and more specifically homosexuals within our movement receives surprisingly little serious commentary. There are a number of professed and implied reasons for this discursive lacuna, some of which may be more complicated than first appear on the surface. At the outset it seems scarcely worth repeating that homosexuality is not a pleasant topic to discuss or explore, and nor is it in any sense straightforward, concerning as it does a variety of complexities of morality, Nature, science, politics, and ideological worldview. One of our late great thinkers, Professor Revilo P. Oliver, expressed this combination of the repellant and the complex quite clearly when he wrote in 1966: “Homosexuality is a disgusting and, in some of its aspects, recondite subject, and even the most concise summary of what is known about it would reach the dimensions of a treatise and require the use of languages other than English.” Oliver, if he were alive today, may well agree with me that this is a subject which brings little reward for the attention that might be devoted to it. However, I believe that Oliver, who lived during a time when the tide of deviant behavior had not risen as high as it is today, would also agree with me this is a subject that should be addressed occasionally, as a matter of necessity, for reasons of ideological clarity and the maintenance of morale.

The reasons most often given for avoiding the subject of homosexuality should be familiar to all readers, though this very familiarity hides a rhetorical usefulness and a lack of deeper socio-historical awareness that has permitted the entry and tolerance of a small but noisy number of homosexuals in corners of the Far Right, not just in the United States, but elsewhere. First, there is the honest but ill-considered refrain that we “don’t care what people do in their bedrooms,” which reduces to narrow absurdity a question of ethnic health, demographics, and culture. Then there are nervous and cowardly assertions from some that the issue isn’t an “obsession” for them, and therefore isn’t one that they waste their time on. Those that do, of course, are simply “protesting too much,” and there must be something suspect about them. According to this line of thinking, men ‘secure in their sexuality’ simply wouldn’t address the topic.

As someone who has devoted many years of study to the Jewish Question, this latter excuse interests me. From a movement ostensibly well-versed in the methods of psychoanalysis and the Frankfurt School, one would perhaps expect a total rejection of quack psychology and its barely-concealed uses for the advancement of interests antithetical to White advancement. The pathologizing of one’s ethnic and/or ideological opponents is presumably so well-attested that no self-respecting member of the Alt-Right or affiliated circles could entertain such mind games. In the Culture of Critique, Kevin MacDonald writes:

One way in which psychoanalysis has served specific Jewish interests is the development of theories of anti-Semitism that bear the mantle of science by deemphasizing the importance of conflicts of interest between Jews and gentiles. Although these theories vary greatly in detail — and, as typical of psychoanalytic theories generally, there is no way to empirically decide among them — within this body of theory anti-Semitism is viewed as a form of gentile psychopathology resulting from projections, repressions, and reaction formations stemming ultimately from a pathology-inducing society.

A key argument of psychoanalytic theories of anti-Semitism is that those who engage in the critique of Jews do so out of repressed jealousies that amount to a desire on the part of the anti-Semite to be Jewish. In this understanding, the anti-Semite so strongly desires to be a Jew that he secretly and subconsciously becomes an inward Jew. The fierce repression of this internal development is so strong that it further evolves into an outward, and irrational, hatred of the Jewish people. An example of this thinking can be found in Theodore Isaac Rubin’s Anti-Semitism: A Disease of the Mind (2009), in which Rubin writes:

The anti-Semite’s most buried and unconscious secret — from himself and others — is the desire to be a Jew. He wants to be free of conscience and inner coercions, and he believes that Jews are free. He too wants to be what he views as the exotic and privileged outsider. He wants to be the total and forever expatriate even as he raves about his own patriotism and nationalistic feelings and influences (91).

The Jewish interest in disseminating such an understanding of anti-Semitism among non-Jews should be patently obvious. What better way to deal with someone hostile to Jews than to convince him that his own hostility is evidence of becoming what he detests? The power of his Jewish-provoked wrath is thus turned upon himself, neutralizing him as an opponent of Jewish interests. Since the beginnings of psychoanalysis, Jewish intellectuals have focused on applying its tactically useful ‘findings’ to myriad historical contexts as part of their growing and unrelenting critique of the West. In the field of academic history, Jewish historians versed in psychoanalysis have written entire tomes in which the central argument is that Europeans persecuted ‘innocent’ Jews for centuries simply because they envied the role of Jews as God’s Chosen People, and had deep-seated desires to be Jews themselves. The late Robert Wistrich, and his Antisemitism: The Longest Hatred (1991) is a classic in this regard, though it also featured in the works of self-hating, incentivized, crypto-Marxist Whites like the late Gavin Langmuir and his History, Religion, and Antisemitism (1990).

To those with a strong enough mental constitution, this tangle of manifestly unprovable theories is little more than ridiculous — a rhetorically impressive folly, but a folly nonetheless. And, at this point, it is worth highlighting the similarities in explanations of “homophobia,” a term coined by George Weinberg but first ‘explained’ as a putative phenomenon by Sigmund Freud. Freud scholar Christine Downing explains that (just as Jewish intellectuals argue that all Europeans wanted to be Jews):

For Freud, we are all in some sense homosexuals… Freud is also persuaded that the fear of one’s denied sexual longings constitutes one of the most powerful elements in resistance to analysis…Homophobia too is seen as an expression of repressed homosexuality. Freud regards it as the individual’s attempt to reject admission of his own unconscious homosexual desires with vigorous counter-attitudes.

Perhaps even more influential than Freud in the modern era, in terms of pathologizing aversion to homosexuality, was Albert Ellis (1913–2007), the Jewish, Pittsburgh-born psychologist who argued in The American Sexual Tragedy (1954) that all men who are not homosexuals are “fetishistic” and suffer from the “delusion” that women are more fun — and hence must be treated as “victims of psychiatric illness.” The striking parallels between these Jewish explanations for hostility towards Jews and homosexuals should be obvious, along with the transparent ambition of promoting a generalized notion of ‘tolerance’ as virtuous and a sign of good mental health. However, whereas stronger mental constitutions appear to have resisted the advance of the former attempt at pathologizing opposition, I am often struck by the apparent readiness, even within our circles, of men eager to reach for Jewish explanations for why they refuse to tackle an issue of some social significance. Moreover, I find it cowardly and weak: “I can’t take a principled position on this issue because if I do then I will appear homosexual in the schema of Jewish psychological contrivance.” Perhaps it’s because I’m a married father of three, that I’m confrontational by nature, or that I find accusations of repression and secret homosexuality to be humorous as much as irritating, but such a contrivance has never worked on me, and never shall. Behind every Jewish claim that the anti-Semite ‘doth protest too much,’ lies the implication that he should stop protesting. And behind the same giggling refrain from the effeminate lies the same implication. And, in the main, the latter works, shielding the degenerate from critique from all but the most fanatical, which in turns lends perverse credence to his claim that only an ‘obsessive’ would critique his ‘way of life’ or draw attention to what he does ‘behind closed doors.’

Reasoned discussion is necessary to break this Jewish-contrived, artificial taboo, and to draw attention to some manifest realities compelling the exclusion of homosexuals from our struggling but sacred movement, and a broader reckoning with the social implications of homosexuality on a national or ethnic level. The willingness of an individual or a movement to take a stand on an issue depends on a strength of worldview. The individual who argues that we should “deal with” this or that subject first (and solely) while leaving other matters to a putative future, does not possess a worldview but a hierarchy of opponents. A worldview entails a complete vision of the world in which we now exist, and a complete vision of the world we hope to shape. Our movement, consisting as it does of often bickering circles, should at the very least be made to conform in some fashion to the world that we are striving for. A situation in which known movement homosexuals and their circles can posture as spokesmen for National Socialism or White Nationalism would be laughable were it not for the fact that it was tolerated with such lethargy by the ideologically lazy and those intimidated into silence by Jewish psychological parlor tricks. Worldview is the foundation of ideology. Ideology is the foundation of activism and morale. Clarity of worldview, and its practical expression in whatever achievable form, is non-negotiable. Just as there is no room in this movement for Jews or Africans or Pakistanis, the over-arching rationale for an exclusion of homosexuals is the fundamental incompatibility of their inclusion under our worldview.

The various reasons underlying this incompatibility may be regarded broadly under two categories: the biological implications of homosexuality (issues of disease and demographics), and the behavioral traits and personality of the homosexual (issues of personality characteristics and socio-cultural impact). It is to these categories that we now turn our attention.

Next: Part 2

Leave a Reply

193 Comments on "The Alt-Right and the Homosexual Question — Part 1"

Notify of
avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Goolag Sucks
Guest

EXCELLANT article. I usually do not spend much time on the HQ, but they absolutely should not be allowed in our movement.

1. Levels of disease and degeneracy
2. Cannot reproduce
3. Nearly all support leftist causes
4. “Reproduce” through molestation of children.
5. Another strain of cultural marxism
6. Acceptance of their degeneracy devolves into things like “Trans-Rights”
7. Their lifestyle is an abomination and no sane person should have to accept it

JohnEngelman
Guest

Homosexuality is a congenital inclination rather than a behavior set. Some homosexuals are faithful to their (female) wives. Some remain virgins.

The sexual problem facing Western civilization is that a growing percentage of people do not get married and stay married to the co-parents of their biological children.

Children raised to adulthood by their biological parents living together in matrimony tend to have fewer problems in life than other children.

Cartier McCloud
Guest
In looking over all these (some self-serving) comments, the fact is that White Genocide covers all that contributes to it. The jew agenda of “normalizing,” promoting, legalizing and criminalizing opposition to such perverted sexual behavior belies the obvious: faggots cannot reproduce. As such, the more faggots are praised, protected and promoted insures that less White children will be born. Many SJW refuse to marry or have children until faggots are totally accepted as part of “normal” society. The fact that they can already marry & adopt children, only insures these children will swing their way. Anyone who wants to see… Read more »
Tom Rogers
Guest

Turing’s contribution has been exaggerated for propaganda purposes (much like now we see the historic contribution of obscure women in various fields exaggerated for ‘equality’).

Le Fox
Guest
Pt. 2 — Robert Wistrich also wrote ‘Revolutionary Jews from Marx to Trotsky’. I’m surprised this book wasn’t mentioned in the essay, although Joyce seems to have read his other works. Freud, as stated before, did discuss homosexuality and the other psychoanalysts believed it was something that could be fixed or changed over time. They did not believe it was inherited, and one of the psychoanalysts even did a talk with a Danish count, who was gay, and others who admitted they did not like being gay. Freud wasn’t entire useless in this regard, and he was right in many… Read more »
Le Fox
Guest
TL;DR I was directed to this series of articles from Common Filth, and felt obliged to comment. Given the recent ‘Christianity is for Cucks’ article, and the abundant ignorance of Greg Johnson’s actions, I say it is too little, too late for you to redeem yourselves. Even here, in the introduction, we see less of the homosexual problem, but more of the Jewish Question. Let’s discuss some of the finer points. “A key argument of psychoanalytic theories of anti-Semitism is that those who engage in the critique of Jews do so out of repressed jealousies that amount to a desire… Read more »
trackback

[…] The Alt-Right and the Homosexual Question — Part 1 […]

BWV
Guest

I think the question being worked on here isn’t whether homosexuals can be allowed to live in the ideal nation or whether they might have something to contribute to it. The issue at hand seems to be whether they can contribute to the creation of it and whether they can serve in leadership positions in that creation.

I’d say no and no.

BWV
Guest
My usual retort to charges of “homophobia” is to laugh and point out that nobody is actually afraid of homosexuals; we’re only disgusted by them. As for homosexual Nationalists it seems unlikely you’ll ever find someone who is genuinely both. Homosexuals, now that they no longer have to hide their disgusting lifestyle choice, are eager – even desperate – to be noticed as homosexuals. One usually need look no deeper than their social media profile – often no deeper than their screen name itself – to discover they are homosexual. I usually explain to that group that “If the very… Read more »
Saint DyRo
Guest

The Resistance Movement can have absolutely ZERO: JEWS, FAGGOTS, TRANSSEXUALS, PEDOPHILES OR PEDERASTS.

FURTHERMORE WE SHOULD STRIVE TO ELIMINATE ALL DEGENERACY FROM OUR PERSONAL LIVES. NO PORNOGRAPHY. NO DRUGS. NO PROMISCUITY. NO JEWISH GUITAR MUSIC. NO ORK HIPHOP. NO VULGAR DEFORMED ART. NO OBESITY, NO LAZINESS, NO VIDEO GAMES.

We need a constant and eternal vigilance to root out all degeneracy from our movement.

IF WHITES REMAIN DEGENERATE WE ARE NOT WORTH SAVING. WE MUST BE A NOBLE AND RIGHTEOUS PEOPLE.

WE HAVE WORK TO DO.

Azzmador
Guest

Here is good info on the nature of faggots.

https://pew.tube/user/lincolnsrock/CcKEEKv

Azzmador
Guest

you faggot

RJ
Guest

Stick to comedy Azz. You’re a funny old man but that scary face is the last thing we need. Every time we get a good thing going, some weirdo like you ruins it. Follow your advice & this whole thing is coming down. Go get DS back.

Azzmador
Guest

Look people, it’s very simple.

Faggots are gay.

Gays are faggots.

They are to be thrown off tall buildings, not accepted in right wing movements.

Pepito Passado
Guest

Once the women start lusting for babies, then the disease of homosexuality will slow and turn back, but first the women have to want our men… we need a war to prove valor, and the homos will be good fighters because we can de-pair them and send one to the front and make the other a reinforcement, and when the front is smashed we will still have reinforcements ready to charge to retake the body of their faggot lover.

Saint DyRo
Guest

get real. no faggots. period.

Pepito Passado
Guest

I am only suggesting that instead of throwing them off buildings they can be used as cannon fodder

Saint DyRo
Guest

That would assume that they even have a use as fodder. Which they don’t. We would have to keep them alive, feed them, and arm them to get them in that situation. Useless. Instead I propose we pulverize their remains, after throwing them off rooftops, and mix the dross into lead, the mixture to be made into shrapnel for loading grapeshot cannons to mow down the hordes of migrants.

trackback

[…] homosexual question” in white nationalism. It’s a long essay divided in three parts: here, here and […]

Clastaschio
Guest
From the above essay: “The individual who argues that we should “deal with” this or that subject first (and solely) while leaving other matters to a putative future, does not possess a worldview but a hierarchy of opponents. A worldview entails a complete vision of the world in which we now exist, and a complete vision of the world we hope to shape. Our movement, consisting as it does of often bickering circles, should at the very least be made to conform in some fashion to the world that we are striving for. A situation in which known movement homosexuals… Read more »
RJ
Guest

Honestly? I thought the idea that ‘Romans weren’t REALLY gay’ was laughable.

But yea… Picking & choosing battles doesn’t seem unreasonable to me.

Lyon
Guest
Andrew Joyce is to be commended for even tackling this issue! And mercifully, this was an intelligent and well written opening salvo on a central question for society going forward. While the cowardly will avoid this topic like the plague, I look forward to parts 2. and 3. And I am open to adjusting my thoughts on the issue as well. And expressing them here to, ideally, moving the dialogue forward. So please respond to my post if you have anything to add, intelligent or otherwise. Also, while I only read a handful of comments below, I decided to not… Read more »
trackback

[…] read: Part 1; Part […]

Brutus of troy
Guest

I made a video talking about Greg Johnson and the gay question in my previous incarnation as the devonshire fascist and I was promptly removed from youtube.
the point is this…
the vast majority of white nationalists don’t like them so why protect them? And if you do protect them you are in fact creating a protected minority because if nature was allowed to follow it’s course they would all be kicked out.

Pepito Passado
Guest

where is your new channel brother?

Brutus of troy
Guest

im doing a podcast now, it’s called brutus of troy, its on jewtube

Pepito Passado
Guest

I just listened to episodes 3 and 4

Brutus of troy
Guest

thanks bro

Pepito Passado
Guest

I found the link to your blog and youtube by clicking on your name there, good to have you back

Pepito Passado
Guest

Are you the guy that wants the big house after everything is finished???

Brutus of troy
Guest

lol, yeah, im getting my house, Jez Turner promised me, all that jewish property in london.. im getting a slice of that, then im going to live off a rental income and go skiing in the alps with my hot young trad wife

Sam Cru
Guest

Fags are gross.

altright_sobriquet
Guest

There are many very talented homosexuals (Turing, maybe Newton, Wilde, etc.). However a disproportionately, very high number of gays – especially men – are completely degenerate.

The Alt-right needs all of the allies it can get. Those gays who are willing to rigorously conform to the traditional ideals of the West and keep their sexual proclivities strictly private should be tolerated if not welcome. It is up to the rest of us to vigilantly enforce social norms – something which several generations of the West have failed to do.

iggyauggie
Guest

We can use fagotry to divide the brown people from their masters. Everyone hates fags except white people. Im not saying there arent a ton of brown perverts but they stone fags to death in brown countries. I dont care what fags do but fagotry should never be promoted

Azzmador
Guest

You should care what fags do, since their primary means of recruiting new faggots is molesting boys.

iggyauggie
Guest

I agree 100% with turning the Democrats into the new catholic priests in terms of untrustworthyness of being around children. Faggotry will be exposed.

trackback

[…] Also read: Part 1 […]

xyz234
Guest
Perhaps the cause of the increase in homosexuality lately has something to do with the use of hormonal contraceptives. From this article published in American Thinker: …”It seems that while doing his graduate work in the early 1960s, he had to do research on lab rats, which were given the synthetic hormones used in the then new birth control pills. The results, he told me, showed that the grandchildren of these lab rats would have high rates of homosexual behaviors. From what he told me, the findings were suppressed. Apparently, the powers that be wanted “the pill” to pass muster.… Read more »
craicher
Guest
Night of the Long Knives 2.0 and then to the closet where you perverts belong. Then there is the issue of sodomites lusting after little boys. Look it up, it seems they nearly all do. Putin was right, don’t let these sick bastards go around screaming about how great they are and their lifestyle. Just look at a homo parade. What is that all about? Just sick degenerates. Now imagine this, there are many normal men out there who never have sex or relationships because they can’t find a woman. How can they live without sex and relationships yet a… Read more »
JosephtheGreat
Guest
The potential problem with a culture of fanatical anti-homosexuality is the tendency for “witch hunts ” to arise. A culture of anti-homosexuality can lead to an environment of fear, paranoia and apprehension. You can’t tell who is a homosexual simply by looking at them and this makes it easy for rumors and accusations to spread. I mean how many times have you seen accusations made that Richard Spencer is a homosexual? You say something like “last stand of implicit whiteness” and people interpret it wrong and now you have a mob of zealots attacking you and spreading rumors. Feverish anti-homosexuality… Read more »
JosephtheGreat
Guest
There are different ways of viewing homosexuality. The ones with the strongest negative reactions to homosexuals view it as a crime or a sin. Something done intentionally and with malice to cause harm. To them homosexuals are similar to murderers or rapists, people who should either be jailed or killed. Then there are those who view homosexuality as a mental illness or a character flaw. To these people homosexuals are similar to drug addicts or alcoholics; people who need help to be cured,but not so much condemned Then there are those who view homosexuality as a lifestyle or culture. These… Read more »
Yehudah Finkelstein
Guest

Bring Back the Closet.

More Andrew Joyce articles, please.

James OMeara
Guest

We must purge out movement of these high-IQ, high-disposable income degenerates. Our movement will triumph with its army of alcohol/opiod addicted rednecks. Thanks for the hint, Jews!

TK
Guest

Yeah, a “movement” of two aged queens who are terrified of even showing their faces is going to go places, lemme tell ya!

Azzmador
Guest

Die of GRIDs, faggot.

iggyauggie
Guest

Well you fags sure as shit wont help in 50 years when you die off

craicher
Guest

And why do so many homos have high incomes? Because they band together like a pack of bloody vampires. You homos don’t give a toss about anything but your own vanity. And on drugs, where ever there are homos there are drugs and I mean heavy drugs. You are sick people, end of story.

Jaded Diaspora
Guest

James, you (and a handful of others) typify precisely the kind of bitchy back-biting that make homos unfit for the movement. Even your snarky response here drips with elitist condescension: “army of alcohol/opiod addicted rednecks”. You don’t love our people you love you own ego, and your own empty hedonism.

James OMeara
Guest

I love White, Western, Aryan culture, so yeah, I guess that makes me an “elitist.” That’s the kind of Archie Bunkerism that lets the Jew walk all over you. After all, who needs culture, as long as you obey the commands of Jew Book.

Azzmador
Guest

You just want to fuck white boys and you fear that muslims will stop you

Jaded Diaspora
Guest
You are making my point for me. I say that you do not truly love our people, you respond: “I love our culture!” You’ve attempted to claim the mantle of intellectual aristocracy, yet you feel nothing of noblesse oblige: “Archie Bunkerism” “Jew Book” You love the trappings of the our high culture, but you cannot scoff at the plight of our opioid addicted brothers — call my defense of them “Archie Bunkerism” — and claim to love our people. And if you do not love our people “from the richest old Thane in the county to the poorest chained serf… Read more »
Identitarian_Ethic
Guest

James OMeara
Guest
Identitarian_Ethic
Guest
The problem with this topic is that instead of encouraging rational discussion, it gives a free hand to dogmatic, anti-thinkers to organize a hateful bandwagon. As the discussion goes on, the comment section will slowly begin to resemble a chat room for ISIS. It seems counter productive to further divide our race into subgroups. It’s especially counter productive to further push some subgroups into the arms of the System. We want the various, traditionally pro-System groups to be at odds with each other, not united against us and with the System. If in our future ethnostate, our culture will provide… Read more »
Andrew Miller
Guest

Well said. Vince Law’s behavior is disgraceful and he has delegitimized Spencer’s right to lead us, since it is Spencer who gave this hateful nutjob free rein of this important site.

Celestial Time
Guest
Simple solution, really. Recognize real talent & the unrealized potential of individuals, and then give those people the tools they need to grow and realize their potential. The overwhelming majority of those who contribute to these types of discussions with nothing but vitriol and regurgitated talking points about the detrimental aspects of homosexuality are doing so because they have nothing of value to add to “the movement” other than a revolving door of vitriol and regurgitated talking points. Often times they are very insecure people who will just move all of their negativity to another target whenever the conversations changes.… Read more »
JohnEngelman
Guest

The more issues a movement becomes involved with the less powerful it becomes.

James OMeara
Guest
Mac Tírè
Guest

Miles Mathis? You’re joking. To him everything is a conspiracy. Every celebrity death a fake: Kennedy, Monroe, Elvis, Lennon, Manson Family victims, etc. 2 of his favorite sources of info are the Jew owned companies Wikipedia and 23 andme. He used info from the latter to show that ALL the NS leadership were jews. The guy is either a disinformation agent or a nut.

James OMeara
Guest

If you really want to help “the Movement,” why don’t you just fuck off and kill yourself? That way we won’t have to take care of you when the actual Revolution occurs.

Nova Morium
Guest

Hello, Antifa…….

Sorry, you’re not Granted Access to the White Brotherhood…….

NEXT…….

James OMeara
Guest

Why, because I know how to use capital letters, brave Mr. Alias?

TK
Guest

Let me know when you and Grindr Greg choose to show your faces, Nancy.

Azzmador
Guest

No, because you are a homosexualist who thinks it’s okay to use your rectum as a playground for your perversions.

ContraButtusThexus
Guest
When your Nazi overlords are fags or tolerate fags. THEN Read this and ponder upon that your dear leaders (may) wear diapers. If not now, then soon. If you are a man and sodomize your wife, you are worthy of a thousand deaths. Spencer was lithping positively over Milo in late summer of 2016. The love of faggotry was already a source of hate for a few good white men. Effeminate men of course like to talk about getting all gussied up in period costumes like, oh, I don’t know… SS UNIFORMS and KLAN HOODS! By the grace of God,… Read more »
Nova Morium
Guest

Huh???

ContraButtusThexus
Guest

Before your time.

Or you are another Nazi fag. Either way, that’s how the diaper crumbles.

Nova Morium
Guest

Huh????

What?????

Nova Morium
Guest

The Alt-Lite is going to save Western Civilization……

Ha!!!!!!!

Nova Morium
Guest

A Great Idea…….

For an Alt-Right Rally Event…….

Let’s buy a LOAD of cheap paperback Anti-White Jewish Pseudo-Intellectual Tomes……

And burn them in a Bonfire……

I’ll definitely donate to this……

FACT……

Nova Morium
Guest

There is a Stark Difference……

Between…….

Wanting to be a Part of a White Brotherhood……..

And wanting to Fornicate with another White Man………

To my White Brothers in the Alt-Right…….

Don’t let Anti-White Jewish Psychoanalysis……..

Deter us in ANY WAY…….

We should Love Each Other………

FACT……

Dillon Francis
Guest

There are cocksuckers in the alt right? If one puts on his jew psychotherapist hat perhaps one can deduce that the fags who are attracted to the alt right are fetishizing the strong male figure. They all belong in a bog or an island of their own.

Clark Kent
Guest
So the thesis of this book is that homosexuals played a significant role in European high-culture and helped defend Western Civilization in the past? Milo-esque characters essentially. This is an interesting thesis, and there might be some truth to it. But these kinds of high-quality queer characters seem to be exceedingly rare. And with what good Milo brings, he is no beacon of traditionalism or true masculinity, which currently is sorely lacking. Statistics show that modern gays are more likely to have psychological problems, drug addictions, suicide, etc, than the general populations. So it’s not as if we can make… Read more »
Dillon Francis
Guest

You probably meant to comment on the link I left to your comment. Regardless, I don’t endorse the thesis of the book. I find it funny at best. The truth is that societies and civilizations were not built by psycho-sexual deviants aka queers. The author of that book is a ‘right wing’ homo hence why he wrote the book.

Clark Kent
Guest

I read into your post and wrote you a book report.
Overall I’m wary of gays, and I’m glad that is the general consensus.

Nova Morium
Guest

If a Jew asks me why I might dislike his Tribe……

I’ll say…..

“Because, you’re always in my F**king Space and Face and you won’t leave me the F**k Alone”

Jewish Behavior is the Main Cause of Anti-Semitism…….

We in the Alt-Right are Normal and Logical White Men…….

We don’t want to be Ruled by a Non-White Ethnocentric and Tiny Tribal Minority……..

And if Jews can’t understand that…….

Then, they must have their own ‘Disease of the Mind’…….

Namely, they want to be Hated, Despised and Attacked……..

Because that Strengthens their Ethnocentric Identity and Tribal Insularity…….

Ed Edgerton
Guest
One does not necessarily avoid the HQ merely to avoid the accusation of latent homosexuality. There is also the issue of choosing our battles wisely. When ideological differences can divide people who would be allies on other more important issues, the path of quiet distancing is usually preferable to open confrontation. I agree about the constant use of inversion in our culture. It has been going on for as long as I can remember. The argument is usually along the lines of “You are only objecting because you are insecure.” What this boils down to is “weakness is strength, strength… Read more »
Rob O'Brien
Guest
A core issue with gays and other disfunctionals, is that disfunctional people almost always resist and agitate against normality, even if only unconsciously. A quick look through the ranks of any lefty organisation or campaign group will reveal fags, disabled, ethnically mixed or foreign etc etc. This holds in any walk of life. The unconscious urge to attack what is normal and therefore better makes them corrosive and swells the ranks of the enemy. It also precludes them from any place in a movement that is seeking to reset what is normal to wholesome, decent and functional norms. We can’t… Read more »
Oscar Madison
Guest

Once the (((revolutionaries))) had isef up their blacks as spear points at white norms the decided on fahgs for theor next wave of revolution as EMJ tells us fahgs are perfect Lil consumers, slaves to their passions and easily lead and manipulated. Dont need lots of money since they wont raise large families etc etc etc.

Fahgs are against reason and the order that is logos, im down with no “movement” that pretends there is a place for them other than the bog

Peter
Guest

If they automatically do everything wrong, how then are they pro-White?

Rob O'Brien
Guest
Simply being nationalist or pro-white isn’t enough. We aren’t any more use than the wogs or semites if we are morally corrupt and broken. If our habits and behaviours are no better than the filth then we may as well pack it in now. This movement is about reclaiming our position as the best and carrying on with that, we were only ever at our best when our morals and habits were correct. Traditionalist, disciplined, healthy in our bodies and minds and building a better world through the application of our superiority both culturally and physically. Nobodies perfect, but we… Read more »
Peter
Guest

I regret, not my position. I want to be white and survive as such, all else is secondary if not irrelevant.

Rob O'Brien
Guest

Utterly without substance in that case. Simply being white but debasing ourselves is pointless and even counterproductive

kaarekazai
Guest
I agree 99% With you. But it is that 1% of autism and lack of realism/pragmatism that does nothing for the cause of white ethnic nationalism and does so much damage for the support of the wider movement. Yes. We can be pro normal hetro Family. Pro sound sexualmorality. Pro traditional gender roles. All of that is good. We can also be pushing back retarded pervers “fagotry” like pride Marches and promotion of genderbending and just all this metro-sexual degeneracy. BUT… Real gay persons are not gay because of culture. It is hormonal. We must not be so hung up… Read more »
Yehudah Finkelstein
Guest

Homos belong in the closet.

Peter
Guest

Who here believes that gays “choose” to be homo rather than just being it? You could beat me to death and I wouldn´t choose it and neither does any other hetero man. So it´s innate, so what´s the point of making a big fuss about it, like, they decided to be homo?? Like, they are homo to make some point, or so….. W T F ??

JohnEngelman
Guest

Since at least the first grade I have been aware of romantic feelings toward girls. These eventually segued to romantic feelings about women. I have never felt that way about boys and men.

kaarekazai
Guest
Listen the fuck up kids! Don’t you fucking understand that we are at the most a couple decades from all out RAHOWA or maybe even bloody white genocide waged against us. We can not dictate Peoples biology. Homosexuals are born that way. WE or nobody else can do anything about the sexual orientaion of these poeple. So quit being a fucking retard and grow up! I am older than most of you. I am straight as a ruler and I have 3 children. Exactly 3 more than most of you. And I am married and have ACTUAL SEX With a… Read more »
Lothar von Trotha
Guest
The problem with avoiding the JQ is that you end up like Jared Taylor, making perfectly valid points about race, for decades, and falling on deaf ears. Perhaps it would be possible to alleviate our ills by simply dealing with media control, banks, neocons etc., i.e. ripping out the roots of Jewish power without mentioning Jews, but to simply ignore the problem of Jewish control altogether makes for a nigh-impossible struggle. Hence why things like Hart-Celler or media narratives continue to bamboozle the government and the people, because they don’t understand where their information is coming from, who it is… Read more »
WHAT
Guest

>fucking fucking fucking
>look at me, me so awesome
>me stronk
>me has broad
>me has dem kidz
>stop noticing the joo mkay

kaarekazai
Guest
Mkay.. 😀 Work hard and grow a beard and you can be awesome to. 😀 But.. How often do you debate normies? How do you plan to redpill anyone on even the simple but essential demography issue and imigration? If you repuls people so fast that they never get to be redpilled on the white genocide they will never lift a finger to defend their race or even their nation. So you need to be a bit more smart. The anti jihadist is totally autistic about islam and can not lift their view abow the Islam Question. If the Alt-Right… Read more »
WHAT
Guest

>look ma I`m naxalting already

Peter
Guest

Great, perfect rant… I subscribe 100% to it, sad that so few have it together like this.
Now I really just need 1 thing exlpained: how come that a guy like Andrew Joyce whom I estimate very highly for his work on unveiling jewish subversion, comes up with so strange a view on the gay question??

Donaldberg Trumpstein
Guest
Donaldberg Trumpstein

Oy Vey fellow civic nationalists!
Remember that there are patriotic LGBT community members like Blaire White and MILO! Notice I said LGBT only, not LGBTQIATYEVC+!
I’m so rebellious I don’t even use a 20 character acronym!
Conservatism is the new counter culture!

(((Shill)))
Guest

Yep. Steven Crowder, a “true conservative,” sure does enjoy inviting Blaire, a tranny, onto his show. You know, it’s funny. He claims to be one of those people who loves to bring in and do shows with people of all sides of the political spectrum, but he has yet to do any form of communication with someone who is altright. Really makes ya think.

Donaldberg Trumpstein
Guest
Donaldberg Trumpstein

Bad Goyim!
Go back to worshipping me and regurgitating D’Souza talking points!

Yehudah Finkelstein
Guest

Liberals я the яeal Nazis!

(((Shill)))
Guest

The sad thing is: I used to listen to lowder with crowder a lot.

Jamal Schwartz
Guest
We probably all have a hierarchy of non whites whom we dislike the most. For me, living and working in London, it is a close call between blacks and muslims. However, even though I don’t want either of these groups near me, I don’t actually have any real hatred towards them as groups per se, just that they are detrimental to what my people can achieve if we banish them. Personally, the gays are probably the lowest down on the list. I think of them as like any who have a mental defect/deviation; it’s a pity that they are that… Read more »
nyúl béla
Guest

Homosexuality is a mental illness, they can be tolerated but should not be promoted.

GENX140
Guest

I’m 100% for white identity to succeed, however when I read comments like “fags to the ovens”, I feel like I’m surrounded by muzzies.
There is no way white identity will become mainstream with such policies.
If you find a way to “cure” homosexuality, go for it. Until then, learn to accept that its part of nature even if it turns you off.

Clark Kent
Guest

AIDS is a part of nature

GENX140
Guest

Some say AIDS was artificially designed. Either way, humanity is trying to cure it.

Jaded Diaspora
Guest

If homosexuals are to be involved at all in the Alt-right at all, then they must:

I. be celibate (due to biological implications that I’m sure Joyce will discuss)
2. reject all trappings of “gay culture”
3. support the traditional family
3. forego internal politics (i.e. bitch-like behavior)
4. forego leadership positions

That is a tall order – one that very few homosexuals could comply with – but I think that this is necessary and the homosexual in our midst who repeatedly fails on one or more of these points should be declared anathema.

JohnEngelman
Guest
A movement becomes powerful when it restricts itself to one or two popular issues that can be propogated with fact based and logical arguments. The more issues a movement becomes involved with the weaker it becomes. Those who agree with some of the issues but not others leave the movement. The strongest issue for the alt right is immigration. Immigration depresses wages and depletes the environment. The immigration of inferior races raises the crime rate along with the cost of the criminal justice and welfare systems. These assertions can be demonstrated empirically without appealing to values and concerns many people… Read more »
craicher
Guest
If they did all of the above they would no longer be homosexuals but just men (or women) with perverted thoughts. Having a compulsive notion to fuck a goat would not make one a goat fucker. Like imagining or dreaming of murdering people does not make one a murderer. But yes, that is what we should demand of them and before too long something called a homosexual would be some strange alien notion that no one would know about. There would still be some sick people around but it would be so rare that near everyone would never know them… Read more »
Ethan Ancabourg
Guest

I am GAY and proud! I’m just NOT a homosexual. It is high time we heterosexuals reclaim the term just like Arabs should assert themselves as Semites too. I’m NOT for the institution of Sharia solutions for “LGBTQ” persons or anyone. But there is no way around it being a homosexual or an unmarried childless heterosexual is inherently selfish. Which the Objectivist in me is okay with.Yet, short of cloning, the World needs happy, healthy, heterosexual couples to reproduce. Or “breeders” as militant homosexuals calls them. No new homosexuals can be minted without heterosexuals….

Peter
Guest

omg omg omg… yes it´s true, the existence of homos equals our dieing out! It´s arithemtically obvious isn´t it… as practically everybody is a faggot rather than chasing pussies *role-eyes* (where do these commenters live…?? on what planet does this world of theirs exist…?? )

Tay
Guest
Problem I have with the anti-gay stuff is that it usually comes down to two things: -Homosexuality goes against the Christian religion. -Moar Whyte babies! The problem I have with the first one is obvious: I am not Christian. I don’t expect Joyce to make the argument as a fellow non-Christian, but we already have Matt Parrott in these comments accusing gays of “anti-Christian propaganda.” If that’s an expellable offense, he might as well be consistent and kick atheists like me out of the movement. Joyce then mentions “biological” issues of “demographics,” which I believe will come down to “homosexuals… Read more »
JosephtheGreat
Guest

Single men are considered a problem. You probably haven’t notice this because you’re anonymous. But if you were to became any kind of leader or known person in the alt right and you are single male older than 30 with no wife or kids or even a girlfriend people will bring that up and it would become an issue for you.

Peter
Guest

How come that an on-the-fly comment from a random commenter is vastly more intelligent than a calmly composed article of a usually excellent man like Andrew Joyce?? Bizarro-world… I don´t get it…

Matt Parrott
Guest

You can be non-Christian without being anti-Christian.

I’m not anti-folkish or anti-skeptic.

(((Shill)))
Guest

Many of the athiests I’ve met physically and on the internet are more anti-christian than many of the gays out there. I’m sure we all remember the days when left-wing New Atheism held a monopoly on youtube and many other parts of the internet. I’m getting a sense of fedora neckbeardism with this one.

Clark Kent
Guest
“But if they are a problem for that reasons, why then are single males like me not a problem?” MGTOWs often do get criticized for being self-absorbed layabouts, but not as much because in theory they can empathize at least to a degree with the biological interest of self-preservation and creating a future for offspring. Monks of the past were recognized favourably because they were a part of the known ascetic tradition, which often promoted values of piety, self-discipline, and education. Monks of the past could also have state-sponsored roles like transcribing documents or becoming members of the formal priestly… Read more »