Gotta Catch ‘Em All

Less than 48 hours after three British men were charged for sharing memes, the UK judiciary has boosted its collection of nationalists by charging four more. On this occasion, the special powers of the four unfortunates consisted of an ability to place pro-White stickers around a university campus.

The Birmingham Mail reports:

An investigation was launched by West Midlands Police after National Action branded stickers containing extreme right-wing material were found posted at Aston University in July 2016. Police have today charged three men with inciting racial hatred in connection with the stickers. Chad Williams-Allen and Dean Lloyd, both aged 26 and from Tantany Lane in West Bromwich, were charged along with Gary Jack, 21, from Heathland Road in Shard End. The trio were charged with displaying written material which is threatening, abusive or insulting, contrary to section 18(1) of the Public Order Act 1986. A fourth man, Paul Hickman, 37, from Norrington Road in Northfield, was charged with possession of multiple copies of two National Action leaflets with a view to the material being displayed or distributed.

The origins of the ‘inciting racial hatred’ clause of the Public Order Act, the legislation under which the men have been charged, are interesting. Efforts to produce an Act of Parliament of this type had been ongoing since the immediate post-war period when, following the bombing of Jerusalem’s King David Hotel by Jewish terrorists in 1946, Jewish delegates attempted to pass a resolution “outlawing anti-Semitism” at that year’s annual Labour Party Conference. The badly mangled corpses of a number of British sergeants, booby-trapped by the Irgun and placed on display, deprived the Jewish contingent of sympathy and the motion failed. They tried again in the House of Commons in 1948, and failed again. In Race Politics in Britain and France: Ideas and Policy Making Since the 1960s, scholar Erik Bleich notes that “during the late 1950s and early 1960s Jewish groups sought laws against anti-Semitic public speeches made during this era, but there is little evidence that this pressure achieved substantial results.”

The Group Evolutionary Strategy

So they switched tactics. Instead of aiming for a law specifically protecting Jews, they would renew their efforts by attempting to achieve a more general law against ‘group libel,’ protecting themselves and Britain’s new non-White minorities from criticism. At first, they attempted to do this via the nation’s libel laws. In 1952 Jewish M.P. Harold Lever, introduced a Private Members’ Bill modifying Britain’s libel laws for the first time in over fifty years. Lever’s efforts were later mauled by a hostile Parliament to such an extent that by the time his Bill became an Act of Parliament, his provisions were not extended, as he and his colleagues had hoped, to cover groups. Britain’s first legislation containing any such provision as prohibiting ‘group libel’ was introduced in Parliament by Frank Soskice, the son of David Soskice — a Russian-Jewish revolutionary exile. In The Commission for Racial Equality: British Bureaucracy Confronts the Multicultural Society, scholars Mark Donnelly and Ray Honeyford state that it was Soskice who “drew up the legislation” and “piloted the first Race Relations Act, 1965, through Parliament.”

They moved even closer in 1985, when M.P. Harry Cohen introduced a “Racial Harassment Bill” to Parliament. Cohen’s attempt failed because due to lack of parliamentary time. The following year, Cohen made a second attempt, which again failed due to resistance in Parliament. Ultimately, the ‘racial clauses’ under which the four men named above have been charged were never put to a democratic vote. The ‘incitement to racial hatred’ clause was slipped in with stealth. The Public Order Act had been initially introduced to Parliament by the now-deceased Jewish M.P. Leon Brittanisky (re-named Leon Brittan) and given significant support by Malcolm Rifkind, a descendant of Lithuanian Jewish immigrants. It was a clever piece of work. Brittan’s team had been tasked with drafting a White Paper on Public Order to deal with a series of miners’ strikes and demonstrations. Although issues of race were not remotely related to the events provoking the White Paper, Brittan saw that the government was eager to pass legislation restricting the miners as soon as possible and, sensing that the wide-ranging and hastily-required bill would endure little opposition, he ensured that additional elements were included, such as the criminalization of “incitement to racial hatred.” It is Brittan’s clever little addition, Britain’s first systematic ‘hate speech’ law, which continues to cause problems for vocal racial nationalists in Britain today. It was later expanded to protect religious and sexual minorities, extending the ‘Social Justice State.’

Only White Speech Is Hate Speech

One curious aspect to this supposedly universal piece of legislation is that it only seems to apply to Whites. I’m no friend of homosexuals, but a case involving Muslims disseminating anti-gay stickers (in much the same fashion as our four charged British nationalists) is instructive in terms of the bias against Whites inherent in the British justice system. A 2011 report in the Telegraph states that:

In February this year, dozens of stickers appeared across Tower Hamlets quoting the Koran, declaring the borough a “gay-free zone” and stating that “verily Allah is severe in punishment.” The Sunday Telegraph has learned that during a routine stop-and-search at the time police found a young Muslim man with a number of the stickers in his possession. He was released without charge on the advice of the Crown Prosecution Service. Police also had CCTV images of a second unidentified Muslim youth posting the stickers at a local railway station, but refused to release the pictures for several weeks.

Sticker Wars

Shortly afterwards Scotland Yard did nothing while Islamic extremists, including a token White ginger convert, stickered half a London Borough with labels declaring a ‘Sharia Zone’ that would “be enforced.” As a tongue-in-cheek response, National Action placed ‘Nazi Zone’ stickers around Liverpool.

A media-stoked mass panic and outrage ensued, and within weeks police had arrested a man “on suspicion of possession of racially inflammatory material which is intended or likely to stir up racial hatred and publishing or distributing written material which may stir up racial hatred.” A local politician waddled out of his hole long enough to inform reporters that “We must unite against this politics of hate.”

Her Majesty’s Multi-Ethnic Gulag

For those that fall foul of Leon Brittan’s legislative sleight of hand, the future is bleak. Even the London Court of Appeal recently admitted that prison sentences passed down for breaking Britain’s speech laws can be “manifestly excessive.” ‘However, ‘excessive’ doesn’t quite cut it when trying to explain the fate of Kevin Crehan, who was sentenced to a year in prison under Brittan’s hate speech law after leaving a few slices of bacon outside a mosque. Crehan died in prison under circumstances that the British government still refuses to explain.

As the Muslim population of Britain’s prisons swell in the wake of numerous terror and child sex cases, the non-Muslim population has been forced to form gangs for protection. The Express has reported that White gangs “began operating after extremist Muslim prisoners began assaulting other inmates.The news comes after an ex-soldier was allegedly “beaten to within an each of his life” in prison. Former paratrooper Craig Jones was beaten by a gang of eight Muslims who were reportedly linked to a terror attack.He was set upon in his cell during the “major incident” at Hewell prison in the West Midlands on January 9. Meanwhile, in March, a top barrister warned the UK prison service is at breaking point over religious bullying.”

A prison is a kind of microcosm of a society under pressure. Pressure is building across Europe and America, and a breaking point will come. When it does, anyone not in the right ‘gang’ will be vulnerable and exposed. Join us.

Andrew Joyce
the authorAndrew Joyce
Andrew Joyce holds a Ph.D. in History and Literature. He is the Editor of Washington Summit Publishers and a frequent contributor to The Occidental Observer among other publications. He is a father of three.


  • Cuck Island continues to impress with hitting levels of subservience to their invaders that should not even be possible.

  • “Anti-semitism is no longer a problem. It’s raised, but it’s raised because privileged people want to make sure they have total control, not just 98% control.” — Noam Chomsky

  • The massive immigration of Islamics and other coloured peoples is illegal and the British people, subjects of the Crown, were never consulted about whether they wanted their country to become a multi-racial, multi-cultural society. Mrs Margaret Thatcher deceived the nation in 1979 when she declared that Britain was becoming swamped with immigrants, using the fears of the subjects of the Crown to gain votes and giving the impression that she would stem the flow. Having got her party into government she did nothing about it, only allowed vast numbers more into the country. Multi-racialism and multi-culturalism has been illegally and unconstitutionally imposed on this nation and the Jewish power controlling the government will ensure that the nation will never be consulted.

  • If enough people in Britain speak out against white genocide, the Crown’s legal system will be overwhelmed, and Britain’s thought crime program will have to be scrapped — if the globalists like it or not.

    I personally witnessed the same phenomenon in California, as millions of Californians began to smoke weed. By sheer numbers, California weed smokers totally overwhelmed the legal system — prisons, jails, courts, probation departments. Then weed possession was reduced from a felony to a misdemeanor, to an infraction. Now weed is a legal medication there.

  • Only the Jews would be this scared. Jew World Order only fears Whites. Only whites and NS can out the Jew Virus. All others are duped. Know your enemy: The Jew.

  • We cannot change this system, our only hope is to wait for it to collapse and fight for the ruins with full force. As it stands, the systems controls the state and there is not much we can do besides waiting. Although, once it collapses, the time for words will be over.

  • It is most telling that the ‘right wing’ tories of the Thatcher era brought in the laws now persecuting our people. I’ve said it before but worth repeating, the tories are and were more anti white than the commie labour party.

    They hid in under the guise of keeping the lower orders in check, the lower orders being the decayed and dispossession remnants of the indigenous population.

  • This is why I urge British nationalists to enter into Lawful Rebellion (under Magna Carta 1215, article 61) to show our intent to the barons we are against the corrupt government.

    All I can say is, I’m very thankful for Dave Russell and Graham Moore because they have serious solutions to take back control of Britain.

      • They side with The Jew. The Jews run the UK, House of Rothschild. Jew International Inc, Marxism International Inc. It is they. The Jew. Keep your eyes on your Enemy: The Jew.


        The Serial Killer, The Traveller’s Daughter, and the Cover Ups

        Theresa May’s Father, Reverend Hubert Brasier, was born on 20th August 1917 at 61 Clonmore Street, Wandsworth, London. Like many people a century ago, his was a home birth. Hubert’s father, Tom Brasier, was a military man. He had served as a sergeant in the King’s Royal Rifles, but was a clerk by the time Hubert was born. Hubert’s mother’s maiden name was Amy Margaret Patterson and they had married 8 years prior in Hampshire. Amy and Tom’s first son, James David Brasier, had died within a year of his birth in 1911 in Uttaranchal, India, where Tom Brasier had been deployed whilst in service. Two years later, in 1919, Hubert was joined by his younger sister and only other sibling Jean Robina Brasier.

        By 1938, Hubert Brasier was 21 years old and attending Leeds University. On the 27th April 1939, preempting World War 2, Neville Chamberlain’s cabinet introduced limited conscription. Single men between the ages of 20 to 22 were now eligible to be called up for compulsory military service. A month later the ‘Military Training Act’ was passed in the UK Houses of Parliament. On the 3rd of September 1939 WW2 began and the ‘Military Training Act’ became the ‘National Service (Armed Forces) Act’ which increased liability of call up to men aged 18 to 40.

        In the year 1940 Hubert Brasier, then 23, had a decision to make. As a man of his age in the early years of WW2 he was probably heading to fight the Nazi Wehrmacht, or heading to defend British colonial outposts. Hubert Brasier felt his only path was that of the Anglican-Catholic Church, and he joined the priests at the Community of the Resurrection Seminary School in Mirfield, West Yorkshire.

        In years to come the Community of the Resurrection would become known for the systematic sexual abuse of children at the seminary by the Italian Verona brothers, who were rampant sex offenders in the 1960’s and 1970’s. However the seminary in Mirfield in the early 1940’s was just about to start welcoming its first refugee children. In December 1941 mass bombing of Sheffield and other northern industrial towns meant many children were evacuated to the countryside. The residents of Mirfield were some of the first to support the war effort and receive evacuee.

        The Community of the Resurrection had only been founded at the later part of the 1800’s. The people of Mirfield took some time getting used to having the single young men of the seminary walking around the village. One Mirfield resident recalled them being referred to as ‘The Petticoat Men of t’Resurrection’. In the early 1900’s the residents of Mirfield grew suspicious of the men of god and this climaxed to a protest outside the Black Bull in Mirfield proper. Father Frere, a talented musician who was popular with the locals, stood on a chair and used his preaching talents to good effect.

        The community of Mirfield and the Community of the Resurrection were a tight knit unit by the 1940’s. When the northern industrial hub of England began to be targeted by the Luftwaffe nightly, many children from all over England were evacuated to communities such as Mirfield. Hubert Brasier would only stay in Mirfield for the beginning of his training.

        In 1942 he was designated to a new church, in London, and after a year of hands on priestly experience he would be ordained. Hubert’s first placement was at The Church of St Andrew on Sandhurst Road in Catford, Southwark. The bombings were numerous in Catford, and the community was very close, soon to be brought closer by tragedy. On the 20th January 1943 a bomb landed directly on the local Sandhurst Primary School, 38 Children were killed alongside 6 teachers. To be a man of God in this devastated community would have meant sharing a lot of suffering and loss. The parents of many of the lost children agreed for them to be buried in a mass grave at Hither Green Cemetary, and for a terraced memorial to be laid in their honour.

        Theresa May’s father was still a bachelor priest at this point in history. During the war life, the whole of London could be savage. The bombing brought death daily to Lewisham and the number of funerals were overwhelming for all of the local religious institutions. When war ceased Hubert continued to serve the Anglican-Catholic community of Catford until 1948 where he was relocated to a Reigate in Surrey and the very small, steeple-free church of St Luke, in the Southpark area. In contrast to The Church of St Andrew in Catford, St Luke’s was almost retirement. Obviously the stress and strain of the war experience had affected the still single Hubert, and the transfer made for good respite. In 1952 Hubert had reached the age of 35, and as in Mirfield at the turn of the century, celibacy provided more questions than it answered. Communities were already rife with gossip and speculation about the private lives of others. It can be presumed that the Anglican-Catholic churches history of child abuse is older than just the last 60 years, and it would usually be easier for a priest to be married.

        The Serial Killer

        The following year, in 1953, Hubert became the Chaplain All Saints at Eastbourne Hospital in Sussex. Over the next 6 years he would work alongside the famous serial killer Dr John Bodkin Adams. For those who are unaware of Dr John Bodkin Adams, he was believed to be the Harold Shipman of his age. He would usually prey upon his more elderly patients, convincing them to put him in their wills, of which over 130 complied. They were soon given an injection by Bodkin Adams, and would conveniently pass away of ‘natural causes’ soon after. On review more than 165 of the deaths that Dr Bodkin Adams oversaw were seen as suspicious.

        The suspicion was not a well kept secret amongst staff at Eastbourne Hospital, most of the nurses had voiced their concerns to their superiors. They were believed to have been ignored on purpose, as the newly founded NHS was considered to be under political threat and a scandal that could see a general practitioner sentenced to death was to be avoided at all cost. The problem was Dr Bodkin Adams just couldn’t stop himself. He was being protected by Lord Gwynne who was believed to be his secret gay lover, and was an extremely well connected politician.

        Hubert Brasier would have given last rights to many of those killed by Adams, he may have even taken confession from Bodkin Adams himself, who when asked by the press if he was guilty of stealing from old women said ‘I have made my peace with God over that’. Eastbourne Hospital is where it is believed that Theresa May’s mother Zaidee Mary Barnes met Hubert Brasier for the first time. Hubert was 11 years her senior and Zaidee had already been diagnosed with MS, and was a regular visitor to Eastbourne Hospital.

        Whether or not in the 1950’s society it was considered appropriate for a celibate hospital chaplain to marry a patient, that is what happened in 1955. Zaidee and Hubert were married in Reading in front of Zaidee’s father Reginald James Barnes whose profession is recorded in the wedding certificate as a ‘Traveller’. On October 1st 1956 Theresa Brasier was born in Eastbourne hospital. The following year Dr John Bodkin Adams would be acquitted of murder in a trail that was an obvious cover up, however he was convicted on 8 counts of forging a prescription, 4 counts of making false statements on cremation forms, and 3 offences under the Dangerous Drugs Act 1951. He would be temporarily struck of the NHS, only to be reinstated in 1961 when the proverbial dust had settled.

        As chaplain of Eastbourne Hospital Hubert was under the Chichester Diocese of the Church of England. During the 1960’s til the 1990’s this diocese has some of the worst examples of child sexual abuse committed by priests. The numbers and the scope of the phenomenon is truly astounding. Canon Gordon Rideout who was the Vicar of All Saints in Eastbourne was jailed for ten years for 36 separate offences on 16 children between 1962 and 1973. Peter Ball, former Bishop of Lewes was convicted of abuse in the 1980’s and 1990’s. Former priest Keith Wilke Denford of Burgess Hill and organist Michael Mytton were convicted of historic sexual abuse. Vickery House, a former Brighton priest was also convicted along with the former Vicar of Brede, Roy Cotton. Former Vicar of St Barnabas in Bexhill was charged and convicted of historic allegations amongst many others. But Father Hubert Brasier was about to be offered a fantastic opportunity that would take him from the Chichester Diocese.

        In 1959, Theresa May’s father, Hubert Brasier was installed as the 1st Vicar of Enstone with Heythrop, deep in the Diocese of Oxford. This cannot be understated, it was quite an achievement. Only 4 miles from Chipping Norton this was a sought after location and Hubert would have been the envy of many men of the Anglican-Catholic cloth. Hubert is approaching his mid forties and it may be time to permanently settle for the sake, and sanity of his family. He lives the quiet life in Enstone for 11 years with only records of baptisms, funerals, and weddings to note his existence. In 1970 Hubert is moved to be Vicar of Wheatley in Oxfordshire as Zaidee’s condition was worsening and he was no spring chicken anymore.

        On October 12, 1981, Hubert was killed in a car accident on his way to a service at a local church in nearby Forest Hill. His Morris Marina edged out of a central reservation and in front of an oncoming Range Rover driven by a chartered surveyor named Desmond Hampton. Hubert Brasier died of head and spinal injuries sustained in the crash soon after, Zaidee would pass away months later. The Oxfordshire Coroner Nicholas Gardiner recorded a verdict of accidental death.

        The Cover Ups

        So there is the life of Hubert Brasier, it doesn’t seem like there’s is much to see. Yet just after Theresa May took over at No.10 her campaign team started to request the deletion of web addresses linked to Hubert Brasier. If you were to go to Wikipedia and type in Hubert Brasier there will be no results. I first realised that he had once had a Wiki entry when I found a version of it in French, and then one in Spanish. Any researcher has the wonderfully named ‘Wayback Machine’ to help them nowadays. You can go to the archive and find pages that have been deleted, only if you can work out the original web address. In this case you can copy and paste the Wikipedia page address and add Hubert_Brasier to the end. You will see Hubert’s Wiki page in all its former glory from a snapshot archived on 17th July 2016. For some reason the people around May, or May herself, do not want you looking into the history of Hubert Brasier.

        After researching Hubert’s life I came across many pages that had been removed, links to nowhere, and a few conspiracy theories too. On investigation of Hubert’s Wiki entry there is nothing damning present. It’s not a large entry, it covers only the basics, so why would you want it removed? The only important information it seems to contain is Hubert’s placements within the Church of England, and that he’s Theresa May’s father.

        On 8th July 2014, Theresa May as Home Secretary, oversaw the appointment of Baroness Butler-Sloss to the inquiry set up to investigate child sexual abuse by prominent politicians and clergy in the previous decades. Within 6 days of the announcement of Baroness Butler-Sloss as chair, she was forced to stand down for obvious conflicts of interest.

        Theresa May had selected somebody whose brother was Attorney General during some of the periods being investigated. Later the same year May chose the then Lord Mayor of London, Fiona Woolf, to chair the inquiry. Fiona Woolf had to stand down when it became apparent that she had lived near Leon Brittan, who had also been accused of alleged sexual abuse. She recalled sending him and his wife a dinner invite at around the time of the accusations. It was almost as if Theresa May was sabotaging the inquiry with no regard for the victims who still required answers. On 4th February 2015, May announced that Dame Lowell Goddard, a New Zealand High Court judge, would be taking over as chair. But a month after Theresa May became Prime Minister, in August 2016, the new Home Secretary Amber Rudd announced the resignation of Dame Lowell Goddard. Soon after her resignation it was announced that one of the existing panel members, Professor Alexis Jay, became the chair. But now the inquiry has faced serious and obvious questions about its credibility.

        To get things so badly wrong must be almost impossible. Theresa May never seemed to meet any of her immigration targets as Home Secretary, and it is truly hard to name her recorded achievements whilst she has been in office. But the inquiry into child sexual abuse seems to be something Theresa May does not want to face. My thoughts are that the investigation will focus on Tory MP’s who frequented the infamous Elm Guest House, but also the Diocese of Chichester, once the ecumenical home of her Father Hubert Brasier. So what is it that you fear Mrs May? The truth about your colleagues, or is it something much closer to home? Maybe May is terrified of people connecting her with the name Brasier?

        I have done my best to build an accurate jigsaw from all the pieces I could locate, but it may need a different set of eyes to see the real picture.

  • I like the KevMac terms used here, especially since Joyce writes at TOO. Really does give the impression that Jews led the anti-libel movement. Names are named, so that made it easier.

    We start with Harold Lever: “In 1952 Jewish M.P. Harold Lever, introduced a Private Members’ Bill modifying Britain’s libel laws for the first time in over fifty years.”

    The Defamation Act itself is not so heinous in that it allows one who has spread malicious lies against a person or an establishment to face legal punishment. Libel laws are what protects the integrity of people, especially if someone called you a paedophile or a rapist. In this case, it is interpreted to mean the protection of Jews from ‘malicious’ lies which are in fact true.

    “Lever’s efforts were later mauled by a hostile Parliament to such an extent that by the time his Bill became an Act of Parliament, his provisions were not extended, as he and his colleagues had hoped, to cover groups.” – True, it didn’t cover the groups Lever wanted, but you didn’t include specifically the parts where Lever wanted those laws to extend to Jews; we are meant to assume that he just wanted it because he was a Jew. As for the bill being ‘mauled’, it wasn’t, really. It didn’t extend to Northern Ireland or applied to Scotland, and it was amended in later years.

    “Britain’s first legislation containing any such provision as prohibiting ‘group libel’ was introduced in Parliament by Frank Soskice, the son of David Soskice — a Russian-Jewish revolutionary exile. In The Commission for Racial Equality: British Bureaucracy Confronts the Multicultural Society, scholars Mark Donnelly and Ray Honeyford state that it was Soskice who “drew up the legislation” and “piloted the first Race Relations Act, 1965, through Parliament.” – Usually, a Ph.D should cite paragraphs and page numbers when citing or referencing books, so that we can get the whole picture. As of now, you’re just tossing out books KevMac style, and I don’t know if you’ve read them or not.

    When Soskice was Home Secretary, he was in poor health and accepted weak amendments to the Race Relations Act, which was a weak act that liberals wholly admit did not change or weaken racism. He allegedly didn’t impress anybody in 1965, so why ethnic Brits allowed him to influence them is up to the reader to make that decision.

    “The ‘incitement to racial hatred’ clause was slipped in with stealth.” – How, when the Bill’s not linked? I’ve got it here:

    “The Public Order Act had been initially introduced to Parliament by the now-deceased Jewish M.P. Leon Brittanisky (re-named Leon Brittan) and given significant support by Malcolm Rifkind, a descendant of Lithuanian Jewish immigrants. It was a clever piece of work.” – By the use of ‘clever’ we are led to assume that this was because of Jewish trickery. Unless we can see every MP and the resulting ethnicity, the cleverness is only in words.

    “Brittan’s team had been tasked with drafting a White Paper on Public Order to deal with a series of miners’ strikes and demonstrations. Although issues of race were not remotely related to the events provoking the White Paper, Brittan saw that the government was eager to pass legislation restricting the miners as soon as possible and, sensing that the wide-ranging and hastily-required bill would endure little opposition, he ensured that additional elements were included, such as the criminalization of “incitement to racial hatred.” – Where is this White Paper, and can we read it? Don’t you think it prudent to include it? Anyways, Brittan did set up an intelligence centre to reporting on the picketers, where is the racial issue? How was this bill hastily issued? Don’t you think you should explain a little more, for curious readers?

    “It is Brittan’s clever little addition, Britain’s first systematic ‘hate speech’ law, which continues to cause problems for vocal racial nationalists in Britain today. It was later expanded to protect religious and sexual minorities, extending the ‘Social Justice State.’” – Brittan was not a well-liked MP and had a multitude of scandals; he was even demoted. Why MPs would come to a universal agreement on this bill despite an MP that would’ve been promoting it for an ideological issue is unknown. Brittan advocated state censorship on the Troubles in Northern Ireland, and the public in the UK did not like him.

    Sexual minorities wasn’t introduced until later, and David Hanson was part of that. But, as you say, you are ‘no fan’ of homosexuals, but still don’t like it when Muslims are the few who openly oppose them. I can’t fault them for that.

    The funny thing about this article is that the one man who should’ve made the list is missing: Chaim Weizmann. Another time, then? Perhaps KevMac or Lasha Darkmoon can lead the way.

  • Ah the British strategy all makes sense now. They WILL get around to going after Muslims after they get done locking up all the Whites who speak out against Islam. I get it, resources are scarce and a government must prioritize what is most dangerous. Obviously White dudes posting stickers is a far more grave threat to national security than several terror attacks by Muslims this year alone.

    Good on you Britain, keep fighting the good fight!

  • It’s amazing how many figurative walls we must tear down to get a physical wall built in this country. I’m surprised this metaphor has not been used yet. Think of our country as an organism, and think of our wall as a shell that protects that organism from physical harm…Essentially the left is arguing that we should be a turtle without a shell, and further that a turtle actually becomes =stronger= when it abandons its shell.

    We all know that the greatest weakness of a turtle is its shell.

    Fuck me we live in Idiocracy.

    • I’m not trying to be over critical so I will approach this in a digital tone akin to a concerned teacher. Do not post a podcast that you haven’t yourself even listened to and then come to a conclusion based off of that podcast. I agree with the conclusion that we are “under attack”, and I love Red Ice, but optics bro, optics.

      • Optics are irrelevant and overrated.

        Just sharing a new Red Ice interview with an Austrailian nationalist who is going to jail for wrongthink. I’ve been saying we’re under attack since Charlottesville.

  • It might be a good idea for these inmates to have a prison riot and have the white inmates dispose of the Muslims. Allegedly this has happpened before.

    Again there is no death penalty there are still enough hardened bastards in there to send a signal.

    • And he was the Home Secretary at the time a backbench MP was calling for an enquiry into child molestation at places like the Elm Guest House (to which Brittan himself was a visitor) – no surprises for guessing that no enquiry took place. And the backbench MP was portrayed as a loony by the press and media. Nothing ever changes.

      • The think is we are losing any ability to even complain… I think this is the result of the panic that was caused by the trump win and the narrow situation here in Europe. And if NATO passes its resolution then this means things unthinkable. Honestly I start to think that we might need to delete our accounts.

        • At the start of the year they passed the anti Islamophobia bill M-103 here in Canada. Technically I’ve been commiting thought crimes all year, and yet I’m still here. I think they will start with taking out public figures that are higher profile than us in the comment section, but who knows. Things are going south quickly.

          • well the panic hit hard, hopefully living in Greece, where nothing works, I got more time.

            On a second note this might be just for public figures for the rest of us we might skim it. Still I am counting on their panic to collect us all.

          • Just something I forgot, the laws might also be unforceable, something that I consider a high possibility but I won’t hold my breath for it and start work with a full assault on us mindset.

            The only good thing that happened was the hightening of the debt ceiling so it helps to make the U.S. dollar into toilet paper faster and so destroy it helps to neuter the U.S.

          • On the plus side, the normies are still too comfortable to revolt. As that comfort deteriorates real resistance should emerge. Things they have to lose are rapidly disappearing anyways.

          • Actually the rising of the debt ceiling is THE WORST MISTAKE THOSE PEOPLE DID EVER IN THEIR WHOLE FUCKING HISTORY!!!

            The thing is there is not sane man that will give money to a country that has been raising over and over its debt ceiling. This helps all of America’s adversaries and it removes a great number of luxuries for the people. But I think this is better for the satelites and the adversaries, if my idea of the media American is correct I wouldn’t ponder too much on them rebelling, the grip the U.S. and somebody else through it has on other starts to weaken.

          • Since you’re not a normie, what exactly ARE you doing to revolt against these laws? Did you raise awareness beforehand, or did you sit in silence?

          • There is nothing that can be done but prepare for what is inevitably coming so that I survive. These normies are docile and domesticated and won’t be awoken from their slumber until their back is against the wall and they are forced to fight for their worthless lives. I’ve tried “red pilling” the normies for years and it doesn’t work. You can’t teach someone anything if they do not want to learn. Electoral politics is useless and so is mass movement politics as far as I’m concerned.

          • Then what’s the solution, then, since you know something the rest don’t? What is your plan for a new world? Do you want a world with a new government, or one with none?

            How can you ‘redpill’ normies when you don’t have a plan yourself? What are you planning to survive against?

          • The solution is to prepare for the coming economic and civilizational collapse. Go off the grid, contribute as little as possible to the system and be as self sufficient as possible. Accelerate the decline and be ready for the chaos that ensues. I’m not trying to “fix” the system, I want it to burn. I’m not trying to “red-pill” normies, I don’t care about normies. They want diversity, give it to them. They want liberalism, let them have it. It’s their funeral, not mine.

            The Kali Yuga has to end before a new golden age can emerge. I don’t know when or how it will happen, but it will. For the past several decades we in the West have been living a degenerate, decadent and unsustainable lifestyle that is not going to last forever. Those totally dependent on the system (urbanites, feminists, faggots, foreigners etc.) will not survive. Those who survive the storm will inherit the earth.

          • You just said you spent most of your life trying to redpill normies, but gave up when they didn’t want to be enlightened.

            OK, then – go off the grid. Grow your own food. Learn how to make your own medicine. Forage. Make weapons. Build your own house. But, since we are having this conversation – I am to assume you do not have the funds as of yet to go off grid?

          • I’m working towards it. I’ve already stated my goals and red-pilling normies isn’t one of them.

          • But you said that you used to spend your time trying to re-educate people.

            Well, no – the only goal you’ve stated is that you want to go off-grid. You admit you have no desire to fix things and simply let people fight it out.

          • Red pilling about race realism is futile. Going off grid is stupid. I will use grid as long as its available, I will use all available resources to increase resilience. I am very active in local community and while I cant talk about race and JQ I can still strengthen it significantly..

            Fixing things is impossible until collapse has begun. System needs reforms that are politically impossible until that happens. We need a new sustainable economic model, government entitlements must be abolished, family planning needs to be balanced between personal and public interests…

          • Talking about race and the JQ won’t offer solutions. You say you want a new sustainable economic model. What is this model? Government entitlements must be abolished, but you will need those entitlements when you want to promote family planning. Belarus has them.

            And how will you fight the JQ? Will you meet them head-on in economics? Construct a new media? Find new ways of entertainment? Make your own content?

            What will your new government resemble? Will it be wealth-based, or will it be communal?

            Because, Mihilus, like it or not…you’re echoing Stalin’s writings on Russia. He more or less said what you just wrote to me.

          • In order to fix the problems in our society they need to be correctly
            diagnosed. You cant make a proper diagnose without going into race
            realism and JQ.

            As I said in previous comment there is not much to do right now. We cant fix this system. It will collapse on its own, my thoughts are on how to rebuild.

            In economy we need balance between free enterprise and central planning. Too much central planning destroys progress and innovation, too much free enterprise destroys resources – natural and human.

            JQ is easy: these people always hanged themselves when given enough rope. It no different this time.

            We need a bunch of smaller sovereign states who rule themselves internally, solve their own internal problems and settle external disputes in peaceful manner.

            I dont care if some ideas are somewhat similar to Stalin’s writings. This is strategy that leftists use when they compare us with Hitler. I judge ideas based on their merit, not by historical figure who might have shared them.

          • “You cant make a proper diagnose without going into race realism and JQ.” – And what are you doing about this race realism? What are you doing about the JQ? What are you doing to protect white women and what are you doing to stop the drug and suicide problems among white men? Are you raising awareness? Getting out there and helping? No. You’re here.

            “We cant fix this system. It will collapse on its own, my thoughts are on how to rebuild.” – You’ll be waiting a long time and dooming your fellow countrymen. You don’t even want to fight for your future.

            “In economy we need balance between free enterprise and central planning. Too much central planning destroys progress and innovation, too much free enterprise destroys resources – natural and human.” – Ah, so the USSR’s system: state capitalism and socialism.

            You judge ideas on merit, which is good. But what are your ideas for improvement? How do you hope to reach out to the youth? Don’t pull a Slavros here.

          • Living in multicultural society and with Jewish supremacists is best red pill on race realism and JQ. I dont need to do anything.

            My view on white genocide is a bit unorthodox. I dont believe there is Jewish conspiracy to genocide whites, I believe there is conspiracy for depopulation and Jews are being used to do the wetwork in white countries. There are very strong forces at play and this needs to play out by its own design. If opportunity to make a change for the better presents itself I will seize it. But for now I feel my role is just commentary on unfolding mass psychological events. Events that would play out that way just the same in our absence.

          • Your commentary is useless if you don’t do a thing to try to change your world. You will be no different than a BuzzFeed activist making videos and endlessly complaining.

            Help your community. Reach out to the women and girls raped and abused by these migrants. Raise awareness over drug abuse and mental illness in your community. Promote family values and encourage people to always be their best.

            You are not the only one to notice Jewish supremacists. The Left has for years, especially regarding their stance on Palestine. It was them, not you, who brought up sensitive Wikileaks documents regarding Israel. In the grand scheme of things, you are in fact the majority when it comes to Zionist aggression.

            But until you are willing to make a change, any change, then sitting back and doing nothing and expecting the spoils when it is all over makes you a vulture.

    • “the President and the President’s Cabinet… use all available resources to address the threats posed by those groups”

      That sounds like an Executive Order to me, not a ‘resolution’.

      The “I’m not Hillary’ act that Trump has been parading around for the last 8 months is getting old with me. He’s Reagan 2.0.

    • This is it. The time for arguments is over. The end of the white race is coming. There is a wild beast in your heart white man, search for him and ride it. Evil is at the door.

  • “following the bombing of Jerusalem’s King David Hotel by Jewish terrorists” – How many died? Isn’t this also like one of the first terrorist attacks in the modern style, where you get guys with long beards speaking mumbo jumbo blowing up unsuspecting civilians.

    “Islamic extremists, including a token White ginger convert”- The high instances of converts to radical islam who are red headed is directly related to childhood bullying over their fire crotches, they are trying to get back at the world by actively joining the religion of destruction.

    “the non-Muslim population has been forced to form gangs for protection” – Well this is good in some respects, shows that the Moslem is an animal, dangerous when free or caged, it would be much worse to read about the whole jail converting to Islam and rebelling which is what you would think would happen if the Moslem really wielded the word of God. Of course all the moslem truly has is his dindu mumbo jumbo tongue and hatred against whites, his religion is built on being anti christian.

    And of course today Trump denounced terrorism and called for more travel bans, without using the term Islamic extremism once! And he is giving amnesty to another 800,000 illegals who will in turn legalize their family members, who are already in the states, so that is like 4-6 million. the hashtag on twitter is #amnestydon


        This was the founding act of terrorism, in this video you can see the men that did it bragging about it, they dressed in Arab clothes and they said it was a political act. The result? Israel became officially recognized as a state. The leader of the terrorists became Prime Minister. No wonder the moslems copy the jews, they copied their religion and now they copy their terrorist tactics.

          • There’s also a much greater difference culturally between Muslims and Christian Europeans than between Mexicans and Europeans in the United States. Mexicans don’t have the puritanism and zealotry that Muslims have. We don’t get terrorist attacks everyday by Mexicans the way Europe gets constant terrorists attacks by muslims.

            This isn’t to say I want a bunch of Mexicans here, only that if I HAD to choose between muslims, mexicans or blacks… I’d choose the mexicans.

          • Up here in Canada we get the Chinks, who to be honest really aren’t all that bad. They have strong work ethic, are mild mannered, low crime rates, high IQs, decent food etc. Their still a fundamentally different people and I do not want them around, but they aren’t as immediately destructive as the other groups mentioned, which makes it that much harder to wake normies up in regards to demographic displacement.

  • This is why I didn’t bother watching Dunkirk despite all the alt right fawning over it. This is the insanity all those British soldiers died in France for in 1940, a future where truth, justice, and patriotism are “Nazism” and the only acceptable politics is Jew and Brown supremacy.

    The English have long been the shittiest Whites, along with Americans and Russians, and I can’t help but feel a bit of schadenfreude at Britain’s descent into bolshevik tyranny.

      • Yeah the trailers showed scenes of them just standing around in orderly lines while the Germans strafe them, as there was nothing else they could do.

        The movie could have been used to subtly redpill people on the senseless slaughter the (((British government))) sent its soldiers into but it seems like the point of the movie was to celebrate the “miracle” of Dunkirk or whatever.

        • I dunno. I felt viscerally sickened and the way the kid read Churchill’s Beaches speech at the end felt hollow. Deliberately so I think.

          • Some alt righters think Nolan is a redpilled conservative who made the movie to portray the pointlessness of WW2 from the British perspective. I’ll get around to watching it sooner or later.

          • This could be. But from what I gathered from the film, it was the love for homeland. I agree the second world war was pointless, especially now with the Gulags and thought police in Britain. They should have listened to Mosley, and my Grandfather slaughtered Germans for absolutely nothing at all – over Churchill propaganda; over bolshevik propaganda.

          • I’ve read some of Irving’s stuff. It’s really not radical at all. He thinks (and has evidence to back his claim) that a one or two million Jews died at the hands of the Nazi’s. That it was done mostly where the Jews were found, with a bullet – not after some silly train ride and a Gas Chamber. And that it was bad, but bad stuff happens in war.

            The reason (((they)) are so mad it him is because he identifies the Holocaust™ for what it is; a marketing strategy concocted in the early 1970’s on Madison Avenue.

          • Of course he knew about Auschwitz. He knew it was a concentration/labor camp. There wasn’t much else to know about it.

          • I would suggest you read Robert Faurisson on Auschwitz.

            1. The only thing at Auschwitz resembling a human gas chamber was constructed in 1946 by Stalin.

            2. Not a single diagnosis of death by cyanide poisoning is on record for any German labour camp.

            3. No trace whatever remains of the millions of bodies allegedly gassed in the German labour camps.

            4. None of the war generals after the war who wrote their memoirs made any allusion to human gas chambers or indeed to any intention to exterminate an ethnic group.

            5. The Red Cross made normal, routine visits to Auschwitz during the war, and its published reports made no allusion to any ongoing human gassing there.

            6. No authentic documents attesting to “The Holocaust” exist anywhere.

            7. The Bad Arolsen archives list everyone who lived and died in all the German labour camps. The question naturally arises as to what is the total number recorded in this tremendous archive. Clearly the managers of this archive are not at liberty to tell of this or they would be jailed for so awful a crime.


          • You’re preaching to the choir, buddy.

            My only point is that Hitler knew there was a camp. “Knowing about Auschwitz” doesn’t imply that he “knew” they were gassing and ovening kikes. Because they weren’t, obviously.

          • It’s all ((( BS ))) i’m afraid old boy.

            “There does not exist then, anything like a written order signed by [Hitler] for the extermination of the Jews in Europe.”
            Colin Cross, Adolf Hitler, (Milan, 1977), p.313.

            “Despite the great harvest of Nazi documents captured by the Allies at the end of the war, it is precisely the documents concerning the process of the formation of the idea of the final solution of the Jewish question that are missing, to the point that up until the present it is difficult to say how, when, and exactly by whom the order to exterminate the Jews was given.”

            Lilliano Picciotto Fargion, La congiura del silenzio (The Conspiracy of Silence), La Rassegna mensile d’Israel, May-August 1984, p.226.

            “For in the table talk, the speeches, the documents or the recollections of participants from all those years not a single concrete reference of [Hitler’s] to the practice of annihilation has come down to us. No one can say how Hitler reacted to the reports of the Einsatzgruppen, whether he asked for or saw films or photos of their work, and whether he intervened with suggestions, praise, or blame. When we consider that he ordinarily transformed everything that preoccupied him into rampant speechmaking, that he never concealed his radicalism, his vulgarity, his readiness to go to extremes, this silence about the central concern of his life- involving, as it did in his mind, the salvation of the world – seems all the stranger.”
            Joachim C. Fest, Hitler (New York: Vintage Books, 1975), p.681.

            “Insofar as no one has yet discovered a written trace of this order [to liquidate the Jews under German control] in the sources which have been exploited up to the present, and insofar as it seems unlikely, it is incumbent on the historian to date it as precisely as possible by appealing to interpretation. Since the methods and the hypotheses on this subject are very numerous, we find ourselves confronted with very diverse opinions.”
            Saul Friedländer, L’Allemagne nazie et le genocide juif, Gallimard, Le Seuil, 1985, pp. 177-178.
            “For the want of hard evidence — and in 1977 I offered, around the world, a thousand pounds to any person who could produce even one wartime document showing explicitly that Hitler knew, for example, of Auschwitz. My critics resorted to arguments ranging from the subtle to the sledgehammer (in one instance, literally). They postulated the existence of Fuehrer orders without the slightest written evidence of their existence. …Of explicit, written, wartime evidence, the kind of evidence that could hang a man, they have produced not one line.”
            David Irving, Hitler’s War (London: Focal Point, 1991), pp.19-20.
            “To the present day a written order by Hitler regarding the destruction of the European Jewish community has not been found, and, in all probability, this order was never given.”
            Walter Laqueur, Was niemand wissen wollte: Die Unterdruckung der Nachrichten uber Hitlers Endlösung (What Nobody Wanted to Know: The Suppression of News About Hitler’s “Final Solution”), (Berlin-Vienna, 1981), p.190.
            ” The New York Times’ … editorial (December 2, 1942) claimed that ‘Of Germany’s 200,000 Jews in 1939 all but 40,000 have been deported or have perished,’ while going on to assert that ‘according to evidence in the hands of the [U.S.] State Department, an order of Adolf Hitler demanding the extermination of all Jews in all territories controlled by Germany’ was known to exist. Researchers nearly 40 years later were still searching for that order, or information leading to anyone who might have ever seen it at any time.”

            James J. Martin, The Man who invented ‘Genocide’: The Public Career and Consequences of Raphael Lemkin (Torrance: Institute for Historical Review, 1984), p.40.

            “No written document containing or reporting an explicit command to exterminate the Jews has come to light thus far. This does not of course mean that such direct evidence will not appear in the future. In the meantime, the presumption must be that the order or informal injunction to mass-murder Jews was transmitted orally.”
            Arno J. Mayer, Why did the Heavens not Darken?: The ‘Final Solution’ in History (New York: Pantheon Books, 1990), pp.235-36.
            “The process by which total extermination replaced resettlement in Madagascar or ‘the East’ as the so-called final solution of the Jewish question remains unclear. No written order by Hitler for the extermination of the Jews has been discovered and the evidence of an oral order is only indirect. The chronology of the development of the extermination programme is also confused.”
            J. Noakes and G. Pridham, eds., Nazism: A History in Documents and Eyewitness accounts 1919-1945 – Vol. 2, (New York: Schocken Books, 1988), p.1136.
            “The archives torn from the bowels of the Third Reich, the depostions and accounts of its chiefs permit us to reconstruct in their least detail the birth and the development of its plans for aggression, its military campaigns, and the whole range of processes by which the Nazis intended to reshape the world to their pattern. Only the campaign to exterminate the Jews, as concerns its completion, as well as in many other essential aspects, remains steeped in fog. Psychological inferences and considerations, third- or fourth-hand accounts, allow us to reconstruct the developments with a considerable verisimilitude. Certain details, nevertheless, will remain unknown forever. As concerns the concept proper of the plan for total extermination, the three or four principal actors are dead. No document remains, and has perhaps never existed.”
            Leon Poliakov, Breviaire de la haine (Breviary of Hate) , Paris, 1979, p. 134.
            “What became known in high Nazi circles as the Fuehrer Order on the Final Solution apparently was never committed to paper — at least no copy of it has yet been unearthed in the captured Nazi documents. ”
            William Shirer, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich (New York: Fawcett Crest, 1960), p.1256.

            “One cannot fix the exact moment when Hitler gave the order- without doubt never drawn up in writing – to exterminate the Jews.”
            Christian Zentner, Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf. An edition with commentary by Christian Zentner, Munich, 1974, p. 168.

          • Evidence of what? That Hitler knew there was a concentration/labor camp at Auschwitz? If what you’re looking for is evidence that it was a “death camp”, you won’t find any. Because it wasn’t a “death camp”.

          • Obviously “he didn’t know”. He knew that if he “hadn’t known” he would have greatly offended the Jews therefore he did his best not to “know”…
            Great SOB this Hitler!

          • The recovery of the Rosenberg Diary was announced with great fanfare in June 2013. The documents had been stolen from the Court records of the Nuremberg Tribunal by the notorious Robert Kempner, aka the Thief of Nuremberg. After years of searching, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Department of Justice recovered 425 loose pages covering the period from Spring 1936 to Winter 1944.

            United States Holocaust Memorial Museum senior archivist, Henry Mayer, announced that these writings could be “the most revealing Nazi documents ever found.” So, what did they reveal?


            “What led us to believe this was potentially of extreme historical importance,” said Henry Mayer, the archivist who tracked the diary with Mr. Wittman, “is the rarity of having a diary from someone of Rosenberg’s stature in the Nazi hierarchy and his close association with Hitler and his positions as looter in chief and murderer in chief and possibly a witness to the actual order from Hitler authorizing the Final Solution.”

            Mr. Wittman noted, though, that while the diary documents the evolution of attitudes that would lead to the Holocaust, it does not detail the specific plan for it.

            “There is no place in the diary where we have Rosenberg or Hitler saying that the Jews should be exterminated,” he said. “All it said was ‘move them out of Europe.’”

          • I haven’t seen it but read a review of it on a swedish alternative site. According to the guy who reviewed it he found the movie strangely had a lot of lack of dialogue. Which he interpreted as a way for Nolan to avoid most PC claptrap.

          • Wait. You didn’t even WATCH the film and yet judged it? Wow. Isn’t that something liberals do? Judge something before watching/reading/playing it?

          • Yet you still made judgement on a film you haven’t watched, because…? Don’t act like an expert or how the film has themes that ‘promote’ certain issues when you HAVEN’T EVEN WATCHED IT.

            There are other ways to watch the film without giving money to Hollywood. You’re on the Internet. Figure it out.

    • dont watch it. worst movie ever by a long way. i was cringing from the first few scenes and only made it 3/4 of the way through. watching a blank screen would have been a much better.

    • The west will only wake up after the at least one nation collapses or becomes Muslim and I think Britain will deservedly go down first.

Leave a Reply