Culture

Can We Afford Not To Fight “Judeo-Christianity”?

I really took an interest in Andrew Fraser’s The WASP Question (Arktos, 2011) which looked extensively at the group evolution of Anglo-Saxons and their currently anti-White pathology/ideology, in a way that reminded me a lot of Professor Kevin MacDonald’s work on Jews (see Culture of Critique and A People That Shall Dwell Alone). It attempts to pin-point some of the core problems we face today in terms of an evolutionary approach, and it is only natural that I was a little skeptical when a friend who knew Andrew Fraser sent me an advance copy of a new book he had written on Christian theology. These two subjects, at least at their face, have little to do with each other. But Dissident Dispatches: An Alt-Right Guide to Christian Theology (Arktos, 2017) turned out to be much more than I thought it would be, and I see now how Christianity itself can be analyzed effectively through an evolutionary approach.

Dissident Dispatches is the product of Andrew Fraser’s, a respected professor of law who was run out of academia for expressing pro-White views, decision to attend divinity school at a contemporary, suburban, school of theology. What he uncovers, and what we should suspect but may not realize, is that Christian theology in the liberal West isn’t about the things we might imagine, like when everyone is going to get ‘Raptured’, why you should ‘save yourself’ until marriage, or even getting to heaven. It is literally about a systematic moral justification for more Middle Eastern wars, adopting children from Africa, deconstruction of white privilege / male privilege, and turning the First World countries into Third Would countries thorough a self-destructive form of altruism and endless immigration. What is really interesting about Andrew Fraser’s book is how he fights back, by expertly deconstructing just how Christian teachings have been twisted, turned, and weaponized against the interest of White European peoples. We know that Cultural-Marxism has marched through and conquered all of our institutions, the state, media, and academia, but Dissident Dispatches gets into just how this was done in another historically important Western institution, the ‘church’. Particularly interesting is how a group of not really all that good German theologians who stood publicly against the Nazis during World War II were turned by the Western media and elite into the leading lights of Christian theology in the years after the war. By the time I was done with the book, it was fairly clear that what had actually happened was the meaning of Christian ‘orthodoxy’ (that is the ‘right’ or true faith) had simply been redefined during that period without resistance, turning Christian theology inside out and upside down. Andrew Fraser easily disarms the Cultural-Marxism / Globalism of his post-Christian professors by calling them out for what they are and using a historical approach (Andrew Fraser also taught history as well as law). After all, everyone knows that European Christians were the most “racist’, “sexist”, “homophobic”, “xenophobic” people to ever walk the earth. This leads into the serious question, if Andrew Fraser makes such easy work of restoring Christianity to something that is pro-White by simply embracing the anti-Christian liberal understanding of it, rather than the redeemed ‘conservative’ (i.e. cuckservative) one, are we losing what should be an easy fight because we simply aren’t showing up for the battle?

Is Christianity already sufficiently disconnected enough from the culture of our people, and dying fast enough, that we can afford not to fight back against the Cultural-Marxism and anti-White propaganda in the Christian churches? I saw a very good answer to that question in a comments section by Weev, who I had heard was a pagan, he asked ‘What would Odin do?’ (i.e. to save our people here and now). Any sensible person can see that there is only one answer. We are in the opening acts of the battle to save Western Civilization, and there is simply no way Western people are going to convert to paganism in any large numbers at this time. 4 in 5 White Evangelicals voted for Donald Trump, but while Red State Christians were busy hailing Trump’s victory along with the Alt-Right, their leaders were playing professional cuckolds for the Democratic Party. Last month the liberal media went crazy when Southern Baptist Convention President Russell Moore, like some Evangelical Pope, led the charge as his denomination formally condemned the ‘alt-right’ (as ‘white nationalism’ / ‘white supremacy’, of course) at their 2017 Annual Meeting. They went even further in the tabloids they controlled, calling out Richard Spencer, Vox Day, and others. There is obviously a very significant difference right now between the opinion of your average White Evangelical and those of their leaders.

What we get from Dissident Dispatches is a clear picture of how Christianity has decreasingly served as a share in the group evolutionary strategy of our own people, and at the same time, increasingly so in that of (((another people))). It also provides a rather sophisticated approach to reversing that state of things. Ultimately, we only have two choices, we can either let our enemies define the relationship that will exist between Christianity and the Alt-Right, or we can exert the will to define the future of that relationship ourselves.

Submitted by Michael Lord

Guest Writer
the authorGuest Writer

176 Comments

  • In fact, Christianity is the BEST for the White Race at the moment!!! It is what most stimulates fertility among whites, stimulates the Family, etc. Therefore, IT IS ABSURD that anyone here wants to do “anti-Christian propaganda”, which will only serve to spread atheism, and reduce the number of children among whites, accelerating and making the White Genocide almost irremediable.
    However, nevertheless, Christianity (except in some specific aspects) will always be inferior to the true cult of Nature. No one, except someone who adore Nature, will adore the PURITY OF THE RACE. The Purity of Race is associated with health, fertility, and Nature (in the “racialist” sense, of course).
    YOU MUST UNDERSTAND that the Jewish Race, creators of Christianity, originates from a “desert region”. Desert places worship sterility, Monotheism (due to the almost unchanged vegetation, climate, etc.). Therefore, for an Arab to be Monotheistic is “very ok”. Now a Caucasian European hails from temperate forests. Hence, Paganism is infinitely more compatible (in fact, with every place “in the forest”; whereas biologically, Monotheism is more compatible with a place “in the desert”).
    Just think in evolutionary-racial, biological terms. ALL MONOTHEISM WAS INVENTED IN THE DESERT, while forests were always Polytheistic. This is frank. The “eye” is very good in light environments, but in ultra-dark caves, it would be “bad energy consumption” and would obviously be harmful. The same goes for everything, in all species of plants and animals. In this sense, Monotheism is not “biologically adapted” for the White Race, by the way (unlike an Arab or a Jew).
    Furthermore, Christianity is MUST an ANTI-EUGENIC Religion, which, in the long run, encourages racial degeneration, through the racial perpetuation of inferior characteristics, or not so good, while adapting to the natural environment.
    IT’S SIMPLE. The Christian “ideal” is that every man, regardless of whether he is mediocre, degenerate, or hyper-genius, has only one wife, and everyone has an equal number of children. That is, since the mediocre (or, biologically speaking, “badly adapted to the natural environment”) are always “ultra-majority”, then this ALWAYS GENERATES a long-term racial degeneration (or, at the very least, non-potentiation the maximum performance possible to the white race, contrary to what would happen in the case of a natural eugenics).
    Therefore, the “Polygamy for Superiors” (pagan), applauded by Himmler and NS, is infinitely better than the “monogamous mediocrity” of Christianity. This is because the superiors, the most warriors, bravest and leaders (“the best”), should perfectly have the right to marry more wives, or to exercise concubinage (and mediocre people should be socially obligated to offer their wives in concubinage for the superiors, as it was of old, and as it is in every purified vegetable and animal society).
    Of course, in the Christian Middle Ages, there was no such problem, because there was a balanced mix between Christianity and Paganism. Hence, great white leaders, such as Charles Martel, practiced concubinage with several women, and no Christian leader (Pope, bishop or any other) criticized or condemned, quite the contrary, beatified him.
    So if we are talking about a Christianity “in the mold of medieval” (the contemporary “Golden Age” for Europe and the White Race), then “ok”. But the dirty search for a Christianity “cut off” of its pagan heritage, not there. Then it will be terrible, generating racial degeneration and decay.

  • Biblical Christianity is the ultimate identitarianism. It transcends earthly distinctions such as race and nationality. Within a Biblical church there is not a race war, a “Black Lives Matter”, nor an “AltRight”.

    The problem is, there are almost no major evangelical leaders who are speaking sensibly to this subject. Our more prominent leaders are more interested in virtual signaling and engaging in “the conversation” which does nothing more than further establish the faux legitimacy of the Marxist agenda.

    Biblical Christianity is so under-represented today most people have no idea what it even looks like though it is not novel. If one looks back to the great, Biblical doctrines of The Reformation, one can get a much better idea of what it looks like. It is a far cry from the pragmatic, consumeristic, self-indulgent Christianity that is now so in vogue.

    There is another side in the culture wars and it is The Kingdom of Heaven. All other positions simply represent the world.

  • Traditional, orthodox Catholicism is very anti-Judaic. Considering that is Christianity in its original, untainted form, why not just embrace that, acknowledging that it was the Catholic Church that created a unified European identity, called Christendom. We are the remnants of Christendom, shattered by the Protestant Revolt, the French Enlightenment, and Modernism, which even now has infiltrated the Church; but the Church from the beginning was the most redpilled institution of all.

  • “Andrew Fraser’s, a respected professor of law who was run out of academia”

    Great to see that academia still has some standards active.

  • Anyone using the term “Judeo-Christianity” in a non-ironic context should be gassed. Secondly, you’re kinda late to the party morons, Jews have waged the only war on Christianity that matters, yours is just laughed off, much like everything else about the kike-right.

  • “…4 in 5 White Evangelicals voted for Donald Trump, but while Red State Christians were busy hailing Trump’s victory along with the Alt-Right….”

    This should tell you WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE EVANGELICALS…before the irreligious go off on idiotic anti-Christian rants. Clearly…the Evangelicals are instinctively MORE PRO-WHITE THAN ANY OTHER WHITE SUB-DEMO. Get it? Btw, is anything more stupid and phony than paganism ? A more fatuous question has never been asked. But I’ll tumble- NO!

  • “Southern Baptist Convention President Russell Moore”. Moore is not now and never has been the President of the Southern Baptist Convention. He heads up the (now ironically named) Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, a small and insignificant “ministry” of the SBC with a seriously outsized public profile.

    It is no secret that Cultural Marxism is rampant in Christian circles, slowly devouring one denomination after another. There is a growing backlash against this however, and ironically the anti-alt-right resolution fiasco is a major driver of this backlash. I am expecting to see a serious schism in the SBC soon with a small but committed number of churches leaving the SBC and shortly thereafter the hollowed out remnant of the SBC going the way of the United Methodists and Episcopalians.

  • Judeo-Christianity? One might as well say Satano-Christianity, that would be far more accurate.

  • “like when everyone is going to get ‘Raptured’

    The “rapture” concept is blatantly unscriptural and anti-Christian. The “rapture” was invented after the Scofield Hoax Bible got popular. You cannot be a Christian and believe in the “Rapture” because Christians believe that God’s judgement is something that is visited upon all people. There is no “go directly to heaven, skip judgement and collect $200”. If you think “Rapture” has anything to do with Christian faith, you’ve ben swilling too much Jewish propaganda.

    • Excellent Pareto.I never knew this about the rapture but I have checked some sources and I believe you are correct.All that comes from the same Scofield charlatan who started the Jews are the chosen people nonsense.Thank you for giving me this wisdom.I believe God intended me to see your comment and learn from it.He also wants to show me how much I could gain from learning about my own faith and not being lazy like most.God Bless you and keep you.

  • Judeo-Christianity makes sense as long as the threats of Islam, Asia and Africa endure. Paganism or atheism can be fine as long as they don’t undermine the basic contours of the struggle for the West

    • What is “Judeo-Christianity”? That’s a made-up concept that never existed prior to the Jewish hi-jacking of Western culture after World War 2. Christianity and Judaism are diametrically opposite religions such that “Judaism” is essentially just “anti-Christianty.” A Christian is *by definition* “anti-Jewish” and a Jew is *by definition* anti-Christian. If either is not, then they are bad Christians/Jews. The religion that Christianity came from was Torah, not “Judaism” which wasn’t even invented until 600AD in Babylon.

      • There is enough common ground between Christianity and Judaism to speak of Judeo-Christianity or Christo-Judaism. The Talmud is full of icky stuff we can cherry pick, but it is important to remember with these quotes that the goyim in question were ancient Middle Eastern persecutors of the Jews rather than modern Europeans. I doubt many Christians would say that their faith was based on Torah, but there is certainly a common cultural heritage there that exceeds any common ground shared with Islam, Buddhism or Hinduism

        • Christianity is basically a moral inversion of Judaism. There is no need to cherry pick. If you are a Jew you are opposed to Christians on a fundamental level and vice versa.

          In form Islam and Judaism have more in common with each other than either does with Christianity. Classical Judaism was basically just Yahweh Akbar.

          • I don’t know. Jews and Christians seem pretty tight. Contrarily, Islam seems intent on doing away with all deviant forces

      • “Are they not inveterate murderers, destroyers, men possessed by the devil? Jews are impure and impious, and their synagogue is a house of prostitution, a lair of beasts, a place of shame and ridicule, the domicile of the devil, as is the soul of the Jew. As a matter of fact, Jews worship the devil; their rites are criminal and unchaste; their religion a disease; their synagogue an assembly of crooks, a den of thieves, a cavern of devils, an abyss of perdition!” — St. John Chrysostomos.

        Saint John Chrysostomos (his name means “golden mouthed” in English) stated: “For he who has no limits in his love of Christ must have no limits in his battle with those who hate Him, I hate the Jews.” This aligns with Psalm 139:21-22 “Do not I hate them, O LORD, that hate thee? and am not I grieved with those that rise up against thee? I hate them with perfect hatred: I count them mine enemies.”

      • http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/index.htm#Chrysostom_Against_the_Jews
        Saint John Chrysostomos wrote the famous “8 HOMILIES AGAINST THE JEWS” which helped shape Christian views on Jewry. The Orthodox Christian Church counts Saint John Chrysostomos among the Three Holy Hierarchs. https://orthodoxwiki.org/John_Chrysostom

        Against the Jews: Preface to the online edition
        Homily 1
        Homily 2
        Homily 2 (missing portion)
        Homily 3
        Homily 4
        Homily 5
        Homily 6
        Homily 7
        Homily 8

    • “Christians are the real Jews”? No. That idiotic ideology has been dismissed out of hand by the Alt Right. “Jew” is inherently evil identity and I don’t know why any white person would embrace it. “British Israelism” is total Jewish garbage. It needs ovened.

        • He knows nothing about it. No real CI says “Christians are the real Jews.”

          But it should be obvious to any racially aware White man that when the Bible speaks of one people better than the rest,

          it isn’t speaking of Jews.

          I mean, lol. Why would any White man think that. It’s nuts.

          And literally nothing in the Bible says Jews are God’s Chosen People. The prophets all said the exact opposite.

          I’d start with Bertrand Comparet if you want to know CI thought.

          • I’ve listened to numerous Comparet videos on YouTube, but haven’t been able to find anything that is very, very basic, and his material is so old it does not take into account recent archaeological discoveries.

            Do you know of a forum where I could ask questions? Finke’s forum doesn’t work. What is the best place?

            Thanks!

          • I’ve never spent any time over there, but Christogenea dot org has a good reputation.

            Comparet’s written sermons are what opened my eyes to the problems with Judeo Christianity’s version of events. They may be lengthy but I think he did a good job of simplifying things as much as possible.

          • “Hasdai ibn Shaprut, who was foreign minister to Abd-al-Rahman, Sultan of Cordova, in his letter to King Joseph of the Chazars (about 960 AD) … speaks of the tradition according to which the Chazars once dwelt near the Seir Mountains.” (Encyclopedia Judaica, Vol. 6, p. 372) http://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/112514/jewish/Hasdai-Ibn-Shaprut.htm

            Romans 9:13 “As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated.” Genesis 36:9 “And these are the generations of Esau the father of the Edomites in mount Seir:” The prophet Obadiah foretells the complete annihilation of Esau’s Edomite offspring, [which “Modern Jewry” descends from] in Obadiah 1:9, & Obadiah 1:18.

            “Edom is in modern Jewry.” — The Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925 edition, Vol. 5, page 41.

            Matthew 27:25 “Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children.” — Jewry, which to this day rejects Jesus Christ, cursed their own progeny on the blood of the Lord Jesus Christ, there can be no greater curse, and they bestowed it on themselves and their descendants.

          • Modern Jewry is largely descended from Edomites (Idumeans) who were forcibly converted to Judaism in 130BC, by Hasmonean Leader Johanan Hycarnus and absorbed into Judean society, as is recorded by historian Flavius Josephus in “Antiquities of the Jews” Book 13: Chapter 9, Section 1.

            http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0146%3Abook%3D13%3Awhiston+chapter%3D9%3Awhiston+section%3D1

            Hyrcanus took also Dora, and Marissa, cities of Idumea, and subdued all the Idumeans; and permitted them to stay in that country, if they would circumcise their genitals, and make use of the laws of the Jews; and they were so desirous of living in the country of their forefathers, that they submitted to the use of circumcision, and of the rest of the Jewish ways of living; at which time therefore this befel them, that they were hereafter no other than Jews.

            The Greek geographer, philosopher, and historian Strabo further testifies to the colonisation of Judea by Edomite converts to Judaism in Geography [Bk 16.2.34]. http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0239%3Abook%3D16%3Achapter%3D2%3Asection%3D34

            In Revelation 2:9, Revelation 3:9, Apostle John speaks of imposters who “say they are Jews, and are not” labelling them the “synagogue of Satan.”

          • Even before Hasmonean leader Johanan Hycarnus had forcibly converted the Edomites to Judaism, and absorbed them into Judean society, the Kingdom of Judea was a shadow of its former self, with only a tiny remnant of true Israelites inhabiting it, as most had been deported by Babylonian King Nebuchadnezzar II beginning with the deportation of 10,000 Israelites in 597BC, (2 Kings 24:14) and followed by the deportation of a sizeable portion of Judea’s population in 587BC, (2 Chronicles 36:20, 2 Kings 25:11-12, Jeremiah 39:9-10) with ONLY 42,360 of these Israelites ever returning to Jerusalem and Judea (Ezra 2:64-65). This small remnant of Israelites in Judea, was subsequently submerged by Edomite converts to Judaism, following Johanan Hycarnus’ forced conversion of Edom/Idumea to Judaism in 130BC, See: Historian Flavius Josephus’ “Antiquities of the Jews” Book 13, Chapter 9, Section 1). http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0146%3Abook%3D13%3Awhiston+chapter%3D9%3Awhiston+section%3D1

            The Greek geographer, philosopher, and historian Strabo further testifies to the colonisation of Judea by Edomite converts to Judaism in Geography [Bk 16.2.34]. http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0239%3Abook%3D16%3Achapter%3D2%3Asection%3D34

          • I recommend checking out “Missing Links Discovered in Assyrian Tablets,” written by the biblical archaeologist, Professor E. Raymond CAPT, this book reviews inscriptions found on the Black Obelisk, Assyrian Cuneiform Tablets and the Behistun Rock which support the argument that today’s White “Aryan” European people are the descendants of the, “Lost” Tribes of Israel. it can be purchased on Amazon, or you can read it free at this link. http://www.keithhunt.com/Arch1.html

            A smaller summary can be found in the article “MIGRATIONS OF ISRAEL” BY RAYMOND CAPT M.A, A.I.A. (The Archaeological Institute of America) http://www.keithhunt.com/Solomontemple8.html

          • But it should be obvious to any racially aware White man that when the Bible speaks of one people better than the rest,

            it isn’t speaking of Jews.

            Except this was written by Jews about themselves, and they have never stopped pushing this narrative about themselves being solely responsible for all good in the world.

            Furthermore you’d have to explain how the morality of the Hebrews comports with European civilizational expressions. What is described and prescribed in the OT is Jewy as fuck. Moral commandments to only be a lender and never a borrower? Rigging grain “stocks” in Egypt to gain ownership of all of the farmland and farmers as slaves in a market downturn? God punishing the Egyptians for doing to Jews what Jews had done to them (ie God punishes Egyptians for treating Jews according to standards set by Jews, also known as fairness)?

            Comparatively the Egyptians seem much more goyische and there is a clear continuity of behavior between the Mesopotamian gypsy bandits aggrandized in the OT and modern Jews.

          • I agree with most of that. But since I’m Christian, I take everything in the OT with a grain of salt. It’s hard to miss the fact that a lot of it glorifies the things that Jesus condemned, things no moral man would ever mistake for being good.

            Basically the older any document is, the longer time Jews have had to distort it’s original meaning. So the oldest parts of the Bible are the most suspect. But there are lots of known mistranslations in the NT as well.

            I disagree that any of it was written by Jews, they don’t tend to create much. They just have a talent for creative editing. And it’s hard to see why they would write a book that identifies them as the offspring of Satan.

            At least they didn’t mess with Genesis 1:1 much, the KJV version is pure poetry.

      • The “Letter of Lentulus,” is an alleged eyewitness account of Jesus Christ, it describes Jesus Christ’s face as being a comely red and his eyes gray, clear and quick.” https://commons.orthodoxwiki.org/images/c/cf/Anon-Publius_Lentulus.jpg

        The description of the Lord Jesus Christ given in the “Letter of Lentulus,” bears more similarities to a painting of Jesus Christ by Dylann Roof (linked below) published in a New York Daily News article by Shaun King, than it does to recent politicized attempts to portray Jesus Christ as being a brown skinned anarchist, which is literally how Jesus Christ is described in the Patheos article entitled “Jesus didn’t get crucified for writing a strongly worded letter to the Sanhedrin.” http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.2939036.1483806832!/img/httpImage/image.jpg

      • Strong’s Exhaustive Bible Concordance definition of ADAM is to: “SHOW BLOOD (in the FACE), i.e. FLUSH or TURN ROSY — be (dyed, made) red (RUDDY).” See http://www.kingjamesbibledictionary.com/StrongsNo/H119/dyed%20red

        Adam’s characteristics, “Showing blood in the face, Ruddy, Flushing, turning Rosy,” are physical attributes that would be used to describe White people. (It would be unusual to say that an African Negro “turned rosy”). Adam’s description matches that of a white male, and Eve can only be a white female, as God made Eve from Adam’s rib, [See Genesis 2:22]. Adam and Eve’s descendants share their parents appearance, and are white, starting with their son SETH, and further down the line, NOAH, who was “perfect in his generations” [Genesis 6:9] and Noah’s sons Shem, Ham, and Japheth, who repopulated the earth after Noah’s flood [Genesis 9:1] with the Adamic race, which the bible is dedicated to.

        Genesis 5:1This is the BOOK of the GENERATIONS OF ADAM. In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God made he him;”

      • KING DAVID is described as “RUDDY” in 1 Samuel 16:12, and 1 Samuel 17:42. The Lord Jesus Christ is a descendant of King David. Ruddy: adjective. (of a person’s face) having a healthy red colour: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/ruddy

        ISRAELITES are described as “WHITE” and “RUDDY” in Song of Solomon 5:10 “My beloved is white and ruddy, the chiefest among ten thousand.” In Revelation 1:14, JESUS CHRIST is described as having a HEAD that is “WHITE AS SNOW” (Head includes face), in Lamentations 4:7, Nazarites are described as being “purer than snow, WHITER THAN MILK,” (Nazarites = ISRAELITES, Numbers 6:2)

      • The reality is that the ethnicities/races inhabiting North Africa and the Middle East today, are not the same ethnicities/races that inhabited North Africa, Palestine, around the time of Jesus Christ, the days of Moses, etc.

        http://uk.mobile.reuters.com/article/idUKTRE7704OR20110801
        Up to 70 percent of British men and 50% of Western European men belong to the genetic profile group known as haplogroup R1b1a2, which Egyptian Pharaoh Tutankhamun, belonged to according to geneticists at Zurich-based DNA genealogy centre, iGENEA. Among modern-day Egyptians this haplogroup contingent (R1b1a2) is below 1 percent.

        http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/archaeology/ancient-egyptians-europeans-related-claims-a7763866.html
        Scientists who managed to obtain full genome sequences of Ancient Egyptians for the first time have concluded the people of the pharaohs were more closely related to modern Europeans and inhabitants of the Near East rather than present-day Egyptians.

      • The article, “The only Jewish male hair ever found” (see link), discusses DNA tests conducted on ancient Israelite skeletons, dated to the 1st century BC, found in stone ossuaries next to the tomb of Annas, the high priest, father in law of Caiaphas, the high priest who betrayed Jesus Christ to the Romans. Hence it is thought that this shrouded man was either a priest or a member of the aristocracy. One of the more fascinating finds in this tomb, was the preservation of a sample of Jewish male hair. The length of the hair was medium to short, averaging 3-4 inches. The color was REDDISH. http://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/ancient-cultures/ancient-israel/the-only-ancient-jewish-hair-ever-found/

        I have never seen a Black African, or an Oriental with Reddish hair, and although I’m not denying that somewhere on earth they might exist, the fact is that Reddish hair is almost uniquely a characteristic of people of White European ancestry.

      • Modern Jewry is largely descended from Edomites (Idumeans) who were forcibly converted to Judaism in 130BC, by Hasmonean Leader Johanan Hycarnus and absorbed into Judean society, recorded by Flavius Josephus in “Antiquities of the Jews” Book 13: Chapter 9, Section 1. http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0146%3Abook%3D13%3Awhiston+chapter%3D9%3Awhiston+section%3D1

        Greek geographer, philosopher, and historian Strabo also testifies to the colonisation of Judea by Edomite converts to Judaism in Geography [Bk 16.2.34]. http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0239%3Abook%3D16%3Achapter%3D2%3Asection%3D34

        “Jews began to call themselves Hebrews and Israelites in 1860″ — See (Encyclopedia Judaica 1971 Vol 10:23) ♦ “Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an Ancient Israelite a Jew or to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite or a Hebrew.” — (pg 3 of the 1980 Jewish Almanac). https://media.christogenea.org/images/wmfinck/1980-jewish-almanac-page-jewish-identity
        https://www.amazon.com/Jewish-Almanac-Richard-Siegel/dp/0553012657

        In Revelation 2:9, Revelation 3:9, Apostle John speaks of imposters who “say they are Jews, and are not” labelling them the “synagogue of Satan.”

      • The Edomites were conquered by John Hycarnus who forcibly converted them to Judaism, and from then on they constituted a part of the Jewish people, Herod being one of their descendants.” [The Standard Jewish Encyclopedia, New Revised Edition, 1966] https://christogenea.org/system/files/resources/StandardJewishEnc-Edom.PDF

        “Modern Jewry” descends primarily from Edomites who converted to Judaism in 130BC, NOT from the Biblical 12 Tribes of Israel. The prophet Obadiah foretells the complete annihilation of Esau’s Edomite offspring, [which “Modern Jewry” descends from] in Obadiah 1:9, and Obadiah 1:18.

      • Aryan = “God’s Mountain”
        https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DBUH-E8VYAAdwHe?format=jpg&name=small

        Inscriptions found on the BLACK OBELISK, ASSYRIAN CUNEIFORM TABLETS and the BEHISTUN ROCK, strongly support the argument that today’s White “Aryan” European people are the descendants of the, “Lost” Tribes of Israel.

        Matthew 15:24 “But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” ♦ “MIGRATIONS OF ISRAEL” BY RAYMOND CAPT M.A, A.I.A. (The Archaeological Institute of America) http://www.keithhunt.com/Solomontemple8.html

        For a more in depth understanding, I recommend reading, “Missing Links Discovered in Assyrian Tablets,” written by the biblical archaeologist, Professor E. Raymond CAPT, it can be purchased on Amazon, or you can read it free at this link. http://www.keithhunt.com/Arch1.html

        What happened to the 12 Tribes of Israel? ~ Professor E. Raymond CAPT. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33DC4UatExo

  • As an agnostic, I don’t have a foot in either camp of the pagans or Christians. But I have to say that as decent as I find the followers of Asatru to be, I just couldn’t ever have a real belief in Odin, Thor, Freyja, etc.. As “archetypes” yes — as gods, no. I figure that there’s either one God or none, So I hope Christianity can be reformed and rescued from its current hopelessly pozzed state.

  • The Catholic Church is largely responsible for building Western Civilization. It is not a coincidence that as the Catholic Church declines through liberalization so to does Western Civilization. At this point I’m sympathetic to Sedevacantist arguments against Vatican II, but I am not a practicing Christian.

    On an individual level I think it’s important for people to have a spiritual foundation to which they live their lives by (be that Christian, Pagan, Buddhist, whatever) but the Catholic Church proper is not where your going to find that at this time. Protestantism is a joke. Perhaps the Eastern Orthodox sects are more legit. I don’t know too much about them.

    While I understand the argument that the Alt-Right is a racially motivated movement, not a religiously motivated one, culture and race go hand in hand, and traditionally religion (Chrstianity/Paganism) has always been an important part of European culture. I’m not sure if you can save the race, while abandoning the religion, and would what we save even be worth it… In the absence of religion Europeans seem to fill the void with Consumerism and Marxism, which are bigger enemies than Christianity as far as I’m concerned.

    • Godless leftists have no bounds in their drive to promote and normalize all sorts of degeneracy, and sick criminality, the leftwing “Green” party in Germany even tried to legalize pedophilia! https://newrepublic.com/article/120379/german-green-party-pedophilia-scandal

      Atheist homosexuals insist on having gay and lesbian mardi gras where they prance around in public, virtually naked, wearing g-strings, “celebrating their sexuality.” Leftist atheists insist on teaching schoolchildren about LGBT lifestyles, drag culture, etc. i.e. the blatant, predatory, brainwashing of children. e.g. Here’s An Amazing Way To Explain Drag Culture To Kids. http://www.huffingtonpost.com.au/entry/queer-kid-stuff-drag_us_594d8816e4b05c37bb768284

      Published August 7, 2017, by WaPo: How to know if your child is transgender: What experts say. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/wondering-if-your-child-is-transgender-here-are-some-tips/2017/08/07/1d655ef8-7b49-11e7-b2b1-aeba62854dfa_story.html?utm_term=.0848c85fd5b0

      http://thegrandadmiral.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/faggots-at-pride-parade.jpg

      Leviticus 18:22, Leviticus 20:13, 1 Corinthians 6:9-10, Romans 1:26-27 define homosexuality as a sin, an abomination, stating that those who participate in homosexual acts won’t inherit the kingdom of God.

    • “… During the course of ages, they who crucified the Messiah, the Lord Jesus, the Son of God, made Europe into the chief battle ground for the devil and against God. And it is today the chief battle-ground of the Jews and of the devil the father of the Jews… Europe does not know this, and here lies all the desperation of its fate, the entire dark tragedy of its peoples. Above all it does not know whom it belongs to. It knows nothing but that which the Jews have ordered it to believe. It can judge of the value of nothing until the Jews have set up their balance for the measurement of value. Its politicians like sleepwalkers in their delirium talk of the equality (ignorance) of all beliefs and non-beliefs, that is, that which the Jews want and desire, because it is necessary for them to have legal equality with Christians, so that they can then drive out Christianity and have Christianity made non-believers, and place their foot on their necks. All the modern catch-words of Europe have been composed by the Jews who crucified Christ, including democracy, and strikes, and socialism, and atheism and the toleration of all religions, and pacifism and universal revolution and capitalism and communism. All these are the invention of Jews, or of the devil, the father of the Jews. But the wonder is that the Europeans, baptized and anointed, should have surrendered so totally to the Jews that they think with Jewish heads, accept Jewish programmes, adopt Jewish anti-Christianity, receive Jewish lies as truth, welcome Jewish catch-words as their own, walk along the Jewish road and serve Jewish aims. This is the thing to wonder at in our time, and nothing else in the world. Everything else is less important or unimportant. But the most important thing is how Christian Europe managed to become the serving maid of the Jews… Think on these things, brother Serbs…” — (Orthodox Saint and Bishop Nikolaj Velimirovic)

      https://orthodoxwiki.org/Nicholas_(Velimirovi%C4%87)_of_%C5%BDi%C4%8Da
      Bishop Nikolaj Velimirovic, was canonised as a Saint by the Serbian Orthodox Church in 2003. His views on Jewry align with those of our beloved Saint John Chrysostomos.

      The Lord Jesus Christ speaking to the Jewish Pharisees, John 8:44Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.”

  • Gnostic Christianity was far more Hellenic (Greek) than Jewish with Egyptian and Vedic influences there as well. Often the Old Testament was flat out rejected and the Old Testament God seen as evil. It emphasised knowledge (gnosis) over faith and strongly asserted that they were the true Christians with the ‘orthodox’ being imposters. They lost out due to the political nature of how religions form. Perhaps the current political climate will see a Gnostic resurgence.

    Jordan Peterson is currently doing a lecture series on the psychological significance of the Bible stories, starting with the Old Testament. Things will get interesting when he finally gets to the New Testament as he has a very gnostic/Jungian view of the Christ ‘myth’. I can’t help feel that should Christianity ever make a comeback, he will have a lot to do with the (re)-formation of it’s theology. Is anyone else watching this series?

  • Making christianity work in our favor is a task for those of us in this Thing of Ours who are believers, not for those of us who aren’t. That said I won’t stand in your way of trying to accomplish it. However, I’d like to offer alittle advice if I may. DO NOT try to reform the various christain institutions or bureaucracies because like the universities they have been completely pozzed and have to be destroyed, so start your own institutions instead. With buttfu#king male prostitutes in the Vatican going on, I think turning your back on these institutions is your best bet.

  • We White Nationalists have, in less than 2 weeks, a rally to unite our movement and some of us can’t cease and desist from attacking the religion of most, if not most a significant number, of our movement. Those of you that are fomenting this infighting, do you not realize the insanity of what you are doing?

    • A lot of people in the altright come from the original atheist skeptic community I know I certainly did. It’s just a logical progression to question religion and then to question diversity, anti-white racism, etc. now I think deeper and understand the importance of religion in our society and among white people, but I think I lot of people still can’t get passed the “fairy tale” part of Christianity.

      • So many “skeptic intellectuals” wear their atheism as some kind of badge of honour, as if they’re the first person in history to question the existence of God. What these nerds fail to realize is that religion has functioned as an ordering force in society, and offered some comfort amidst the confused and seemingly meaningless suffering of life. Not everything can be deduced by pure reason.

        And what has the secular modern world offered in exchange? In 2017 people are surgically removing their genitals because they can’t figure out what gender they are and this is supposed to be considered perfectly normal.

    • Good point. Personally I try to not criticize anything or anyone that is truly pro-White and if I don’t have something good to say, I say nothing.

      However, those who are not truly pro-White, and those that preach against or aid in harming Whites–which many, many Christian churches do–are fair game for honest criticism and should have the error of their ways pointed out.

      My test is a simple one: If you say you are a Christian and if you say you are pro-White, and if you have the chance to save 100 non-White Christians from a sinking boat or just one pro-White atheist or non-Christian or pagan, who would you save?

      Who would you save, Paulie Boy?

    • My test is a simple one: If you say you are a Christian and if you say you are pro-White, and if you have the chance to save 100 non-White Christians from a sinking boat or just one pro-White atheist or non-Christian or pagan, who would you save?

      Who would you save, Paulie Boy?

          • Reply 2: No need to be coy. Just tell us. Would you rescue the 100 non-White Christians or the 1 White non-Christian (pagan, etc.)?

            Is your tribe the Christian “tribe” or the White tribe?

      • If Christianity is philo-semitic, as you obviously believe, why do jews have such hatred for Christianity. Why is it that the only time a jew ceases being a jew is when he converts to Christianity? And, that aside, please explain to me how attacking one of the cornerstones of Western Civilization advances that cause.

        • 1 John 2:22 and 2 John 1:7 state that those who deny that Jesus Christ is the Son of God, i.e. the followers of non-Christian religions (e.g. Jews) and atheists, are antichrists.

          John 7:13 “Howbeit no man spake openly of him for fear of the Jews.”

          John 9:22 “These words spake his parents, because they feared the Jews: for the Jews had agreed already, that if any man did confess that he was Christ, he should be put out of the synagogue.

          John 19:38 “And after this Joseph of Arimathaea, being a disciple of Jesus, but secretly for fear of the Jews, besought Pilate that he might take away the body of Jesus: and Pilate gave him leave. He came therefore, and took the body of Jesus.”

          John 20:19 “Then the same day at evening, being the first day of the week, when the doors were shut where the disciples were assembled for fear of the Jews, came Jesus and stood in the midst, and saith unto them, Peace be unto you.”

  • I am a pro-white Catholic Christian. It is true that Christianity is a “universalist” religion in the sense that it supercedes race, but it is also true that within this context white people play a special role and have a special responsibility in the world. I know that can be perverted for leftist purposes in form, but even in the present it rolls out as a racist charitableness where whites civilize lesser races through Christian missions abroad. The universalist aspect of Christianity has been greatly practiced as a missionary practice in other countries, not by bringing foreigners into white countries.

    That is what I wanted to say with respect to the universalism of Christianity. What I want to say with respect to the white people’s religion is effectively what was said in the article: Christianity *is* the white people’s indigenous religion. I’m tired so I’ll just end off with the following: literally the only way for a Jew to stop being considered a Jew by other Jews is not atheism, buddhism, sinning, or anything else. The only way a Jew can be cast out by other Jews is by converting to Christianity.

        • That doesn’t change the fact that the first Christians were Jews. The first followers of Jesus were Jews.

          • “Christianity *is* the white people’s indigenous religion.”

            How is that so when the first Christians were Jews who lived in the Middle East? How is that the indigenous religion of whites? That makes no sense. Individuals of European decent were pagans. Christianity is no more indigenous to whites than it is to Ethiopians Actually, Ethiopians had it first.

  • Don’t forget most American churches are trying to replace the King James Bible with one of the new versions, especially the New International Version. The real reason is because from the professional Christians point of view the KJV was developed by patriarchal white English men, which to them is unacceptable to the cultural Marxist agenda. This is significant because the KJV has significant scriptural support for an earth that is not original, but rather has been regenerated, and so is far older than 6,000 years. The verses do not read the same way in the more modern versions in support of this.
    It is no coincidence, so called American Establishment Christians absolutely despised the late, great Peter Ruckman who uncompromisingly maintained that the King James Bible is the only true word of God and that all the other translations are frauds. Ruckman, who was hated by both the SJW crowd and the mainstream Christian establishment for his KJV only beliefs was one of the very few pastors worth listening to. R.I.P.

    • I can think of a simpler explanation for replacing the KJV: Even many white Americans these days lack the literacy and attention span to understand that version’s difficult and archaic English.

      • The language issues provide an extremely convenient excuse for everything else and there is a very rich irony to it all. Anybody into Christianity can appreciate that the Bible must be ready s-l-o-w-l-y, only a few verses at a time because a single verse can have astoundingly deep meaning. The Bible has not ever been intended to be prose readable from cover to cover. Logically, this should put the language into the true but irrelevant category. Yet, it is one of the leading talking points, even among so called Christians.

  • There are far too many run-on sentences and non-standard use of commas for this article to be readable. I like to spend my energy on comprehension, not translation.

  • What if we heard commentary on this issue from a pro-white Christian? There doesn’t seem to be many of those in the comment section…

  • Vox Day’s greatest contribution to the alt-right is his articulation of how ridiculous the notion of Judaeo-Christian values is. Jews have less in common with Christianity than Buddhists, who share many of the same core concepts.

    Jews have no dogma concerning the heaven/hell. I agree with them that the concepts are dangerous and almost certainly wrong. But true to their nature they don’t have an answer for why it is imperative to be “Good”. Instead, they see themselves as gods. They are responsible to nobody, but sometimes each other. True Satanists if there ever existed such a movement. Just as Jesus said.

  • I don’t think so, at least not at the moment. For one simple reason.

    Religion is tied to fertility. Period. No ifs, ands or buts. White right wingers have more children than leftists, but those right wingers largely do so because of RELIGION.

    If you can find a way to break that, I’d support a movement to replace the church with something we could guarantee would never betray the white race again. Until then, less replacing Christianity, more replacing traitorous pastors and priests.

    From the older white “normies” I’ve talked to, even if they agree with -everything- I say about race implicitly or explicitly, the second you mention atheism or disregard God you’re worth less than the filth that they’ve scraped off their shoes.

    • “Until then, less replacing Christianity, more replacing traitorous pastors and priests.”
      Spot on. Let’s not destroy something that it is still partially useful.

    • I’ve noticed that it makes secular progressives who claim they love Charles Darwin uncomfortable when I remind them that Darwin married his cousin around the time they both turned 30; yet despite their late start, they had ten children, and seven of them survived to adulthood.

      I have also never come across anything to indicate that Charles had any premarital sexual experience, so just imagine what today’s degenerates would say about a 30-year-old male virgin who married a virginal woman around the same age (preferably not his cousin, for eugenic reasons), then they had a large family like the Darwins’. If people like the New Atheists admire Charles Darwin so much, why don’t they advocate following his example of premarital chastity and a stable and fertile marriage?

      • The “New Atheists” were decidedly homo-friendly. Dawkins cheerfully encouraged atheists to follow the example set by pervs, who adopted the term “gay”, which Dawkins considered to be a representation of fun and light-heartedness…He followed this by encouraging atheists to call themselves “Brights”, which irritated another New Atheist, Christopher Hitchens. Hitchens once excoriated the Church for suggesting that his friend, the stomach-churning Stephen Fry, would burn for his butt-piracy. Hitchens, according to Fry, had engaged in homo activity while a student at Oxford.

      • Yes, being cosmotheist is a much better alternative then simply being atheist, you get to worship trees grass and man and all that good stuff, you can start churches that are y’know, totally not like cults lol.

        • Troll. What is the point of your comment except to attack someone who is pro-White?

          If you don’t have something nice to say about someone on our side, just don’t say anything.

          • Sure, I’m a troll for mocking someone who’s plead guilty to child pornography charges. Lol.

  • Let me know when you figure out that we have a jew problem more than a Christian problem. Judeo-Christianity is an oxymoron. Not all Christians are zio-christians and do not believe that it is our duty to facilitate judaic messianic prophecy or not resist it.

    • This depends on where you live. I find it completely understandable that some European Christians scoff at the apparent “anti Christian” bend of American Alt Righters, but the bottom line, in America, Christian organizations worship Jews, not Christ, or God.

    • Not everything is always about the Jews. There is no denying the fact that certain white Christians proliferate anti-white ideals because Jesus said be nice to strangers and treat foreigners as you would your own people and stuff like that. If you think Jews are the main problem that’s fine, but there are still micro problems that we can talk about amongst white people.

    • Well said John, we are not all zio-christians and Pastor Steve Anderson a Fundamental Baptist is living proof that some Christian are well aware of the jewish problem. Historically Christians were antisemetic it was only about 200 years ago that Christians started getting fed jewish lies that led them to believe they are Gods chosen people. A man called C.I.Scofield change all that with his Scofield Reference Bible. Pastors have been using verses out of it for a long time now and it is very pro zionist.. I will leave 3 video links, two are very short about 7 minutes with Steve Anderson but again it goes over why jews are not the chosen people and if this interest you, i would recommend The video called “Marching to Zion” produced by Steve Anderson and gives a lot of info of the jews and scofield.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8i-Py5BXP0
      .
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SsldyFTMyE
      .
      Marching to Zion:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6l3L_QAmpdE&t=4596s

  • Whites who can’t seem to quit Judeocucktianity could always make up their own religion. Look at Mormonism, an absurd belief system totally made up by Joseph Smith close to 200 years ago that now has something like 15 million followers. Their coffers may not rival the Vatican’s, at least not yet, but all that tithing has added up and they build gargantuan, ugly-ass expensive temples all over the place.

    Would it be so hard for someone to just make up a new version of Christianity where Jesus is a Greek whose parents were Zeus worshippers? Excise all the Jew garbage and recast every role with Greeks and assorted pagans from the same general area. Jesus probably didn’t even exist, what does it matter what religion he was? It’s like arguing over Mrs. Claus’s cup size.

    • We could also repurpose Christians’ often dumb apologetics, like using their strategy to defend the classical Hippocratic Oath: If Apollo and the other Greek gods don’t exist, then how can physicians have any basis for morality?

      Or: If the Nereids don’t exist, then how can the lives of sailors who drown at sea have any meaning?

      Or: If Zeus doesn’t exist, then who throws the lightning bolts when it storms?

      Because the Christian versions of these apologetic questions make about as much sense.

      • It’s astounding that he got so many people to go along with this, people who were already practicing more plausible religions.

        • Mormonism, along with other American cults in the 19th Century like Seventh-Day Adventism, Christian Science and the Oneida Community, originated in and drew its first converts from the traditionally Puritan culture of New England and adjacent states with Puritan-descended populations. These new religious movements apparently tried to recreate the fervor that led Britain’s religious obsessives to migrate to New England in the 17th Century in the first place.

    • The thing about Mormonism is I’m sure most of those 15 million people don’t take everything seriously. It’s more about identity and community. I can see why people would become Mormon it’s a very tight knit community that has each other’s back and work together to better other mormons. They were prosecuted and this only made them stronger. This is very similar to the modern alt-right identitarian movement.

    • The Greek myths are full of the worst degeneracy imaginable, they’re riddled with incest and faggotry and petty, niggerish behaviour from the “gods”. Not exactly what I would consider a good example. The Norse and Egyptian pantheons are no better, both also filled with degeneracy and petty, asshole gods.

      Normies need a sky daddy to stop them from acting like savages and the “Jew on a stick” is our best bet for that. It’s not going to work if you insert a bunch of degenerate ass pagan shit about fucking animals and drunken orgies.

        • Except that was PEOPLE acting like niggers, not God. You can make the case for the God of the Old Testament being an asshole but He never engaged in degeneracy. In fact He was notorious for punishing it harshly. Does nuking Sodom and Gomorrah ring a bell?

          • The Old Testament in the Orthodox Church by Fr. R. Stergiou
            http://www.orthodoxchristian.info/pages/old_testament.html

            The Old Testament was the only form of Scripture used by the Lord Jesus Christ who often quoted from it, as did St Paul, St Peter, St John the Evangelist, other New Testament authors and the first Christian community.

            The Church fought the Gnostics and the Marcionites vehemently against their attempts to exclude the Old Testament from the Canon, and was victorious in this endeavour. On account of these and other historical and doctrinal events, the Old Testament was included by the Orthodox Church in the Christian Biblical Canon.

            The Greek term “canon” for the Orthodox Church came to mean a collection of the Old Testament and New Testament books which were accepted as “Divinely inspired.” The books which were not accepted in the Canon as divinely inspired were still accepted as “holy books” and were classified as “apocrypha.”

            Much of the Orthodox Church’s Liturgical texts and prayers are taken from the Old Testament e.g Psalms. By studying the liturgical books of the Orthodox Church, one may extract the following information:

            1. The reading of the Old Testament occurs during ecclesiastical periods, great feast days, and on a daily basis in certain services. During all these services, biblical representation is exclusively from the Old Testament.

            2. The Church uses many of the Old Testament’s characteristics (history, prophecy, pedagogy) as criteria in her selection of readings. At times the selection of these texts are directly related to the message of the feast, and at other times they are indirectly related.

            3. In the liturgical life of the Church, some of the books of the Old Testament are read in their entirety (Genesis, Proverbs, Isaiah and Jonah)

          • Christian scripture states that the Lord God and his laws stay the same! The Apostle Paul stated in 2 Timothy 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:”

            Matthew 5:18 “For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
            Hebrews 13:8 “Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever.”

            Isaiah 40:8 “The grass withereth, the flower fadeth: but the word of our God shall stand for ever.
            Malachi 3:6 “For I am the Lord, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed.”

          • Christian scripture states that the Lord God and his laws stay the same! Apostle Paul stated in 2 Timothy 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:”

            Matthew 5:18 “For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
            Hebrews 13:8 “Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever.”

            Isaiah 40:8 “The grass withereth, the flower fadeth: but the word of our God shall stand for ever.
            Malachi 3:6 “For I am the Lord, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed.”

      • The Gods in Greek mythology weren’t meant to be examples for mortals to follow. That wasn’t how their religion worked. Quite the opposite.

        • I minored in Classics bro, you’re not telling me anything I don’t know. A black-pilled religion that tells you everything is shit, everyone is a scumbag and the gods are against us is the last fucking thing we need right now.

          We need hope, not more black pills.

      • The homosexuality and even transgenderism of Odin/Wotan/Woden, and the overall acceptance of homosexuality in Viking paganism is outlined in the below links. By comparison, Christianity defines homosexuality as a sin, an abomination, stating that those who participate in homosexual acts won’t inherit the kingdom of God, per Leviticus 18:22, Leviticus 20:13, 1 Corinthians 6:9-10, Romans 1:26-27.
        https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DFWoRG6VoAA_-JL?format=jpg&name=small
        https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DFWoUxYV0AAUKnT?format=jpg&name=small
        https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DFWomFXUAAANtve?format=jpg&name=small

      • I hesitated to post a link to this LGBT website, as I don’t like linking to sites which from a Christian point of view, promote sexual degenerate lifestyles, however the article, entitled “20 Greek Gods Who Had Same-Sex Relationships” provides a useful summary of the homosexuality and transgenderism in Ancient Greek Paganism. https://www.pride.com/gay/2016/9/10/20-greek-gods-who-had-same-sex-relationships
        e.g. Best known as the Greek god of wine, Dionysus was also the god of intersex and transgender people. 

        The homosexuality and even transgenderism of Odin/Wotan/Woden, and the overall acceptance of homosexuality in Viking paganism is outlined in the following links. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DFWoRG6VoAA_-JL?format=jpg&name=small
        https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DFWoUxYV0AAUKnT?format=jpg&name=small
        https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DFWomFXUAAANtve?format=jpg&name=small

  • I think Christianity has been inverted as well. Christians used to be very Anti-Semitic as the Democrats say, but now they aren’t. The term “Judeo-Christianity” has become increasingly common. Neo-Christianity is really (((Christianity))) in the sense that it hurts Christians as it helps everyone else. The Christian church worried so much about expanding that it let its core rot. Similar to Rome, Christianity seems to be dying as a result of expansion . Sure, it is an outside religion to Europe, but we can not refind our ancestors Gods in America. If all of Europe becomes pagan in response to Islam, I fear America will turn against Europe in another brother war that will end will whites being eradicated.

    • It’s a long essay but Martin Luther himself, who rejected the Catholic church outright, was absolutely red-pilled on the JQ. Check out his “On the Jews and their Lies”
      http://vho.org/aaargh/fran/livres9/Luthereng.pdf

      It’s really only now in the 20th/21st century West that the Jews are thought of as victims of history who are beyond any reproach or scrutiny.

        • Exactly, prior to the war the theory of supersessionism was widespread all through out Christendom. Jews were no longer considered the chosen people as they forfeited that privilege once they killed and rejected Christ.

          I cringe everytime I hear contemporary Christians utter the dreadful term “Judeo-Christian”. How can one be so blind within the religion of Jesus Christ? How can they continue to worship both Christ and Christ’s killers? When will the Christ cucking end?

          • Jews were NEVER the chosen people in the Bible. Those were the Israelites, not the Jews.

            Jews and Israelites are always described as different groups in the Bible, not sure why anyone thinks different. And then you have to consider a lot of bad translations in the KJV and subsequent edition, the word “Jew” is used in place of Judah, Judean and Judahite which are all basically wrong.

            Of course, Jews have worked hard to put this idea out there, that they are the chosen ones and Christians should worship them and not Christ. Jews know, most people won’t be bothered to do a lot of independent Bible study lol.

          • Where does it say they are the same? lol

            Note that the Jews are ALWAYS described as a separate group from Jesus. He “would not walk in Judea, for fear of the Jews.” Are we supposed to believe the man that willing to die for our sins was afraid of Himself?

            The Israelites were a genetic line, an extended family. Otoh, from the beginning of their appearance in the Bible, Jews are described as something others not born a Jew could become. Esther 8:17. That is completely incompatible with the idea that a Jew means an Israelite.

            Jews are always described separate fron Israelites. Keep your eyes open and you’ll see it everywhere throughout the NT.

            You should also know that the KJV and most later editions of the Bible are full of mistranslations. Basically they substitute the name “Jew” for 1) Judahite (ethnic description of an Israelite of the tribe of Judah) 2) Judean (national description for anyone living in Judea) and 3) Judah. And then took out the books that detail the Edomite takeover of Judea while the Israelite were in captivity in the dungeons of Babylon. How’s that for chutzpah? lol

            Jesus said that they did descend from Abraham, but Abraham was not their father. Rather they were of the devil, not God (John Chapter 8). All of which implied the Edomite heritage of the Pharasees.

            He even accused them of murdering all the prophets as well as righteous Able (Book of Matthew). Again, pointing out that the Jews are not Israelites but rather Edomites of the line of Cain.

            And His name for them was the “Synagogue of Satan” (Rev 2:9, Rev 3:9).

            Etc etc etc.

            The writings of Bertrand Comparet are a great source for information on all this, and good luck to you with your studies.

          • Thanks for this post.
            I haven’t read the Bible in full yet, but I’ve been talking to different posters about nationalism in Scripture and other ideas related to our predicament. When I get around to reading it I’ll be keeping an eye on stuff like this so thanks.

          • In Luke 11:47-51 the Lord Jesus Christ tells the Jewish Pharisees that it was their fathers who killed the prophets, and they will be held responsible for the blood of all the prophets, from the blood of Abel, to the blood of Zechariah, which may imply that their fathers murdered Abel, making these Jewish Pharisees, descendants of Cain, as it was Cain who murdered Abel. In John 8:44, the Lord Jesus Christ tells the Jewish Pharisees that they are of their father the devil, this would, per the above, make Cain the son of Lucifer, and “modern Jewry”, Lucifer’s biological offspring via Cain.

            Cain is absent from Adam’s genealogy in Genesis 5:3-5, and Cain is seemingly placed in Lucifer’s genealogy in 1 John 3:12, this is particularly interesting when considering Matthew 15:13 “But he answered and said, Every plant, which my heavenly Father hath not planted, shall be rooted up.”

          • There’s so much in the Bible that speaks of a dual seedline, it’s a mystery to me how there can be any question about it. Thanks for the links SaintPhineas.

          • You’re welcome, I’ve looked up the dual seedline writings from the previous mentioned sources, [Early Celtic Church, Christian Saint (Justin Martyr), Apostolic Father Ignatius of Antioch, early Christian author (Tertullian) and the Apocryphal Gospel of Philip’s and Protevangelion, and will post them shortly. Dual seedline has been around for a long time, per the writings of the above mentioned sources, it’s certainly interesting, and I understand the logic of it, per my earlier post, however as an Orthodox Christian I don’t adhere to this doctrine, as it doesn’t align with the teaching of my church. It is however, worthwhile understanding it.

          • “Christ became man by the Virgin that the disobedience which issued from the serpent might be destroyed in the same way it originated. Eve was still an undefiled virgin when she conceived of the serpent and brought forth disobedience and death. But the Virgin received faith and joy, at the announcement of the angel Gabriel…and she replied, “Be it done to me according you your word”. So through the mediation of the Virgin he came into the world, through whom God would crush the serpent” (Saint Justin Martyr’s”Apologia” Chapter 100 / 150 AD).

            “Likewise, through a Virgin, the Word of God was introduced to set up a structure of life. Thus, what had been laid waste in ruin by this sex, was by the same sex re-established in salvation. Eve had believed the serpent; Mary believed Gabriel. That which the one destroyed by believing, the other, by believing, set straight”
            — (Tertullian’s
            “The Flesh of Christ” 17:4 / 210 AD).

          • “Flee, there fore, those evil offshoots (of Satan) which produce death-bearing fruit,. . . These men are not the planting of the Father, but are an accused brood. And says the Lord, ‘Let every plant which my heavenly Father has not planted be rooted up.’ For if they had been branches of the Father, they would not have been ‘enemies of the cross of glory.’ But now, by denying the cross, and being ashamed of the passion, they cover the transgression of the Jews, those fighters against God, those murderers of the Lord; for it were too little to style them merely murderers of the prophets.’ Keep yourselves, then, from those evil plants which Jesus Christ does not tend, but that wild beast, the destroyer of men, because they are not the planting of the father, the seed of the wicked one.” — Ignatius Of Antioch, (35-110 A.D.) Epistle To The Trallians, quoted in “The Ante-Nicene Fathers,” Volume I, Wm. B. Erdmans Publishing Company, Grand Rapids, Michigan.

            Matthew 15:13 “But he answered and said, Every plant, which my heavenly Father hath not planted, shall be rooted up.”

          • http://gospelofthomas.nazirene.org/philip.htm

            “Adultery occurred first, then murder. And (Cain) was begotten in adultery, (for) he was the son of the serpent. Therefore he became a manslayer just like his other father, and he killed his brother. Yet every mating which has occurred between those who are dissimilar is adultery.” — Gospel of Philip (Apocrypha) Verse 46 Patterson Brown translation

            “First, adultery came into being, afterward murder. And he was begotten in adultery, for he was the child of the Serpent. So he became a murderer, just like his father, and he killed his brother. Indeed, every act of sexual intercourse which has occurred between those unlike one another is adultery.” — Gospel of Philip (Apocrypha) Verse 46 Wesley W. Isenburg translation.

          • “Unlike each other” = of differing ethnic lines.

            In other words, race mixing is always adultery. It’s a betrayal of your kin(d).

          • The below Question and Answer liturgy was used as an innovative method of teaching by the Early Celtic Church and can be found in the book, “The Celtic Church in Britain” by Leslie Hardinge, in a chapter entitled “The Role of the Scriptures”, pg 48. https://www.amazon.com/Celtic-Church-Britain-Leslie-Hardinge/dp/1572580348

            “Who died but was never born? (Adam) Ÿ Who gave but did not receive? (Eve, milk) Ÿ Who was born but did not die? (Elias and Enoch) Ÿ Who was born twice and died once? (Jonas the prophet, who for three days and three nights prayed in the belly of the whale. He neither saw the heavens nor touched the earth) Ÿ How many languages are there? (Seventy-two) Ÿ Who spoke with a dog? (St Peter) Ÿ Who spoke with an ass? (Balaam the prophet) ŸWho was the first woman to commit adultery? (Eve with the serpent) ŸHow were the Apostles baptized? (The Saviour washed their feet).”

          • You’re welcome, Dual seedline has been around for a long time, per the writings of the above mentioned sources, it’s certainly interesting, and I understand the logic of it, per my earlier post, however as an Orthodox Christian I don’t adhere to this doctrine, as it doesn’t align with the teaching of my church. It is however, worthwhile understanding it. I’ve posted below the dual seedline writings from the previous mentioned sources, [Early Celtic Church, Christian Saint (Justin Martyr), Apostolic Father Ignatius of Antioch, early Christian author (Tertullian) and the Apocryphal Gospel of Philip’s and Protevangelion.

          • The belief that Lucifer fathered Cain, known as “two-seedline,” was taught by the early Celtic Church in Britain. See pg 48 of the book, “The Celtic Church in Britain” by Leslie Hardinge, in the chapter entitled “The Role of the Scriptures.” https://www.amazon.com/Celtic-Church-Britain-Leslie-Hardinge/dp/1572580348

            “Two-Seedline” doctrine is found in writings attributed to the Christian Saint (Justin Martyr) — See, (Saint Justin Martyr’s “Apologia” Chapter 100 / 150 AD), Apostolic Father Ignatius of Antioch — See,(Ignatius Of Antioch, (35-110 A.D.) Epistle To The Trallians, quoted in “The Ante-Nicene Fathers,” Volume I, Wm. B. Erdmans Publishing Company, Grand Rapids, Michigan.), the early Christian author (Tertullian) — See, (Tertullian’s “The Flesh of Christ” 17:4 / 210 AD), (Apocrypha) Gospel of Philip (Verse 46), and (Apocrypha)Protevangelion (Chapter 10:1-10).

          • In “Wars” Book 2, Chapter 8, Section 2 Flavius Josephus states that of the Pharisees, Sadducees and Essens, only the Essens were Israelites by birth.
            http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0148%3Abook%3D2%3Awhiston+chapter%3D8%3Awhiston+section%3D2
            “For there are three philosophical sects among the Jews. The followers of the first of which are the Pharisees; of the second, the Sadducees; and the third sect, which pretends to a severer discipline, are called Essens. These last are Jews by birth, and seem to have a greater affection for one another than the other sects have.”— Excerpt from “Wars” Book 2, Chapter 8, Section 2

            This indicates that the Pharisees and Sadducees, (who Jesus Christ rebukes, e.g. See Matthew 16:1-4) were converts to Judaism, most likely of Edomite ethnicity given King Herod was an Edomite, and Judea’s demographic makeup around the time of Jesus Christ was primarily comprised of Edomites who had been forcibly converted to Judaism in 130BC by Hasmonean leader Johanan Hycarnus, as recorded in: “Antiquities of the Jews” Book 13: Chapter 9, Section1. http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0146%3Abook%3D13%3Awhiston+chapter%3D9%3Awhiston+section%3D1

          • I’ve used it as a stand-in to refer to Christianity and those parts of Judaism that are included in the Bible (the non-degenerate parts) when speaking to normies. Though it’s a loaded and vague term, it helps to acknowledge Christianity and previous OT “Judaism”, whereunder there was a group of “Jews” who represented upstanding people (quotes represent colloquial definitions). It’s complicated, but it helps to smooth discussions among various groups of Christians.

            If Jews actually believed or acted in accordance with their Torahnic law, we in the Alt-Right would likely not have to be so counter-Semitic, as that law is very insular, nationalist, and anti-degeneracy. The Zionist Jewish ethnic supremacists, however, are expansive, anti-White, genocidal maniacs bent on conquest and corruption, which necessitates our counter-Semitism.

        • Martin Luthers last sermon before he died was ranting about how vile and evil the jews are, he was correct the jews are “The Synagogue of Satan”
          John Calvin
          St Augustine
          John Chrysostom
          All believed the same.
          Meant that response for Clark Kent sorry about that BDTR.

      • Martin Luthers last sermon before he died was ranting about how vile and
        evil the jews are, he was correct the jews are “The Synagogue of Satan”
        John Calvin
        St Augustine
        John Chrysostom
        All believed the same..

      • But he wasn’t redpilled on the Turk; he would rather they destroy White Catholics. Same for brother wars; his ideas started and inevitably let to them, like the 30 Years’ War, the French Wars of Religion, etc. Luther was a maniacal heresiarch and bowel-movement fetishist pervert.

        • I’m not a fan of Luther or Protestantism, but he did name the Jew.
          With Francis currently as Pope, I hold Eastern Orthodoxy in the highest esteem in terms of viable Christianity.

    • When the Antichrist returns he will united all religions, except the true believers in Christ who are not cucked by what is going on in Churches today. But the strategy is to unite us all together has already started.
      Think about these terms:
      Judeo-Christian
      Chrislam aka Christian-Islam
      Jewbu aka Jew-Buhdist
      Except for Christianity these other religions believe in a oneness doctrine or one God.
      Christians have the Trinity, the Father,Son and Holy Ghost, this is difficult to explain to non Christians so to keep to my point i will not bother.
      This oneness doctrine is being taught in many Christian churches now as well and this will help Anti-Christ to bring all the gullible together when he arrives.

    • Saint John Chrysostomos (his name means “golden mouthed” in English) stated: “For he who has no limits in his love of Christ must have no limits in his battle with those who hate Him, I hate the Jews.” This aligns with Psalm 139:21-22 “Do not I hate them, O LORD, that hate thee? and am not I grieved with those that rise up against thee? I hate them with perfect hatred: I count them mine enemies.”

      http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/index.htm#Chrysostom_Against_the_Jews
      Saint John Chrysostomos wrote the famous “8 HOMILIES AGAINST THE JEWS” which helped shape Christian views on Jewry. The Orthodox Christian Church counts Saint John Chrysostomos among the Three Holy Hierarchs. https://orthodoxwiki.org/John_Chrysostom

  • “What we get from Dissident Dispatches is a clear picture of how
    Christianity has decreasingly served as a share in the group
    evolutionary strategy of our own people, and at the same time,
    increasingly so in that of (((another people))).”

    This surprises you, how?

    For a belief system that rejects evolution, it is to be expected.

  • “There is obviously a very significant difference right now between the
    opinion of your average White Evangelical and those of their leaders.”

    Whenever I hear some conservative whining about how their leaders don’t represent them, I want to punch them in the face.

    They ALLOW themselves to be placed in that position. They should have know who their leaders were decades ago, and taken steps to replace them; they never do.

    In politics, they re-elect the same people decade after decade, then after ever election whine “We was betrayed!!”

    They aren’t being betrayed, conservatives just don’t give a shit.

    • You see that in the Republicans’ failure to do something intelligent about Obamacare. They’ve complained about it for years, so you’d think their leaders in Congress would have strategized and drafted legislation well in advance to repeal, replace or reform it, including getting all the side deals nailed down that you have to make to get the votes all lined up. Look at what has happened instead. These people just don’t seem that competent at planning ahead for the things they want, which makes me worry about how they’ll react to the crises they didn’t anticipate.

      • The Republican party never wanted to repeal Obamacare, and had no intention of ever doing so.

        The conservative rube voters were just too easy to fool.

  • Christianity is Jewish. The parables and sayings attributed to Jesus have their mirror images in Jewish teachings. It is not a religion for Whites who want to remain White.

    • There are no commonalities between Christianity and Judaeism, save some common mythology that is not central to either.

    • subverted and even maybe originally but I wouldn’t go there. just say wtf are you bringing religion into this if they do

    • Chritianity is a total overhaul of Judaism and no Jew would ever consider themselves even close to a Christian.

    • No Judaism is about the state. The state of Israel and how to better the state. Christians learned it wasn’t all about the state and more about the individual and how to better the indivdual and how to live better lives as a human. This is why these ideologies are competiting not a sequel of one another. Remember that religion is some of the original complex political thoughts of the time and not some fiction book like Harry Potter.

    • Jesus spent His entire ministry in opposition to the Jews and condemned them and their teachings in the harshest possible terms.

      What you’re saying reminds me of those say “antifa are the real Nazis.” No, ideological opposites are not the same. They are the opposite of being the same.

  • The Fuehrer said (I’m paraphrasing) that Nationalsocialism is a brotherhood of blood, not of faith; that we are political soldiers and not religious reformers and that we are fighting for the survival of our race, not for the supremacy of X or Y religious doctrine.

    Remember the 14 Words: We Must Secure The Existence of Our People and A Future for White Children. Discussion about how many angels or Valkyries can dance on the head of a pin is useless and counterproductive.

      • Islam does not advocate for the continuation of Europeans, so obviously not. Being political soldiers means that skin is a ticket in, but it isn’t enough.

      • If a guy is both a National Socialist and a Muslim convert, run away fast because he might also be an FBI informant or a crazy person

        In some countries over in Europe, normal people are both white and Muslim. And from what I hear, not all of them are Albanian tier

        So that’s where the question gets interesting.

        • Wasn’t there a case recently where a man and his roommates/friends were NatSoc and he converted to Islam and then attacked (maybe killed) his roommates?

          The problem with giving even “normal people who are both white and Muslim” space is that one is giving Islam space. Islam is simply not something that should ever be given space.

          I really question the sanity of white people who convert to Islam. The famous British musician, Cat Stevens, converted to Islam and renamed himself Yusuf Islam. He is now on record saying things that are fundamentally just as dangerous to Western Civilization as Islamic terrorism. Islam poisons the well.

          I’d be fine with white Islamists converting away from it and assimilating into (renewed) Western culture again. That neutralizes the threat.

          • Yes, there was a crazy NatSoc who converted to Islam and murdered two atomwaffen members

            I would regard conversion to Islam as a sign of mental instability and run away

            I’m just not willing to start writing up religious policy for the Balkans, given that I know very little about it.

            Obv we probably don’t want Muslim immigrants from the Balkans coming to the US

      • Good question. In my personal opinion there are religions who are more ‘compatible’ with our fight than others; and clearly Islam is not one of them.

        • Islam is a great religion if you want to regress technologically and intellectually and stay there for centuries. It would be catastrophic for White people and White civilization. I do not trust Islamists at all.

        • What Islam has going for it is that it doesn’t pretend to be above violence.
          Islam is a barbarian’s religion, which is why they are so effective at invasion.

      • I don’t know if that quote is accurate. In MK he spent more than 3 pages explaining how religious wars (especially the 30 Years War) are counterproductive for the Race and the People.

        The closest you get for an explicit christian declaration is the NSDAP Program, where they say that they favors ‘positive Christianity’ whatever that means.

        • You can be a Christian while at the same time thinking that the sectarian wars of the past were a stupid waste of resources, and counter productive. Christian infighting only makes our enemies stronger imo, just like WN infighting does.

        • True. There might have been political reasons for the quote. So as to not alienate vast portions of the German population before obtaining power.

          • From my interpretation of National Socialist ideology, it rejects Christianity and focusses on friedrich nietzsche theory of the Übermensch. You cannot be Christian and an Übermensch. The Übermensch rejects religious morale values.

          • Not everyone can be an Ubermensch. Christianity for the masses. Nietzsche for those who are capable/worthy. I think this is where Hitler was coming from tbh. He knew that Christianity was important to Germans, and was necessary as an antidote to Weimar degeneracy, though I don’t think he was a practicing Christian himself.

          • I have the same interpretation.
            He wasn’t just going to completely shit on the religious convictions of the German people like it meant nothing. Christianity was part of the common identity of Germans, and it would not only be impossible, but also disrespectful, to expect them to just disregard their own history and worldview in the midst of a horrific world war.
            Hitler was clearly an intelligent man, I’m sure his personal religious ideas were unique and complex.

          • Precisely. I know my MK and the line “we are a christian movement” is nowhere to be found. Check out Part II chapter X, where he talks about religion.

        • My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded only by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God’s truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was His fight for the world against the Jewish poison. Today, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before in the fact that it was for this that He had to shed His blood upon the Cross. As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice…. And if there is anything which could demonstrate that we are acting rightly it is the distress that daily grows. For as a Christian I have also a duty to my own people…. When I go out in the morning and see these men standing in their queues and look into their pinched faces, then I believe I would be no Christian, but a very devil if I felt no pity for them, if I did not, as did our Lord two thousand years ago, turn against those by whom to-day this poor people is plundered and exploited.” ~ (Adolf Hitler, in his speech in Munich on 12 April 1922)

          [Note, “brood of vipers” appears in Matthew 3:7 & Matthew 12:34John 2:15 depicts Jesus driving out the money changers (adders) from the temple. The word “adders” also appears in Psalms 140:3]

        • “It is necessary that I should die for my people; but my spirit shall rise from the grave, and the world will know that I was right.” — Adolf Hitler 1945

          “I am now as before a Catholic and will always remain so” ~ [Adolph Hitler, to General Gerhard Engel, 1941]

          On May 3, 1945, the Catholic press of Spanish dictator Francisco Franco,published the following eulogy in honour of the Fuhrer:

          Adolf Hitler son of the Catholic Church died while defending Christianity. It is therefore understandable that words cannot be found to lament over his death, when so many were found to exalt his life. Over his mortal remains stands his victorious figure. With the palm of the martyr, God gives Hitler the laurels of Victory.”

        • It’s a matter of historical fact that Jewish Bolshevism attempted to eradicate Christianity. National Socialism was not opposed to Christianity. e.g. Nazi party official Joseph Goebbels wrote: “I take the Bible, and all evening long I read the simplest and greatest sermon that has ever been given to mankind: The Sermon on the Mount! ‘Blessed are they who suffer persecution for the sake of justice, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven’!”

          “There will come a day when all the lies will collapse under their own weight, and the truth will triumph again.” – Joseph Goebbels 1945

Leave a Reply