Nameless Podcast: The Radicalization Of Middle America

Conservative-leaning Americans (read: non-SWPL white people) are growing increasingly radical in their opposition to the predominant opinion-shaping institutions of the country.

Andy Nowicki discusses how, according to a recent Pew poll, conservative-leaning Americans (read: non-SWPL white people) are growing increasingly radical in their opposition to the predominant opinion-shaping institutions of the country, namely the media and the academy.

What is driving this trend, and what does this trend portend? Andy speculates, with reference to various unseemly exhibits, including a homo-erotic ESPN magazine cover and a teen magazine’s recent endorsement of rectal adolescent buggery.

  • Rastignac

    I allways enjoy this man talking to himself in his car! Allways very good points! Keep up the good work, Nowicki!

  • Great to see the old Alt Right crowd back here, hopefully we’ll get more Colin Liddell stuff too.

    growing increasingly radical in their opposition to the predominant
    opinion-shaping institutions of the country, namely the media and the

    The media and academic “consensus” – the “mainstream” – was always a mile wide but an inch deep. Few people actually “believed” the consensus, most were simply browbeaten into silence.

    The young who grew up on the “consensus” were of course given all sort of ways to rebel against the system that were harmless, all sorts of consumerist subcultures and social trends etc.

    But once the internet went mainstream, new kinds of consensus were formed, multiple consensuses, because the flow of information was no longer one way, but two way and even multiple-ways.

    • Blank Spott

      LOL “hipster racist”, being one of Liddell’s fake accounts. Bitch, you’re fooling no one. Your attacks on Anglin tell us everything we need to know. Anglin’s done more for us than you faggots ever will.

  • silviosilver ✓ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ ˢᵘᵖᵖᵒʳᵗᵉʳ

    I used to detest Nowicki (as I detest anyone who derides Jew-crit as “da Joooooos”), and I don’t care for his religious views, but I’ve come to think it’s good to have intelligent people like him, who don’t automatically denounce us as “racists,” speaking up.

    • Kudzu Bob

      Nowicki gets it wrong sometimes, but he is an honest, thoughtful man with demonstrable moral courage (After all, he is publicly Alt-Right). He is also an extremely talented fiction writer, as this piece demonstrates:

      The Movement is lucky to have a man like him.

    • SLCain

      He banned me from the old Alt RIght website. He gave a platform to the loathsome anti-white John Engelman, who did so much to ruin the comments section at AmRen, and when I and many (many) other people complained about it, he got snotty about it and said – this happening during a fund-raising drive – he would take down the article if he received $1,000 in contributions. I thought this revealed an astounding contempt for his readership.

      So……..f**k that guy. I won’t ever again give a s**t what he thinks.

      • Andy Nowicki

        That was Colin Liddell, not me. I don’t even know how to ban or remove people.

        • SLCain

          I was not aware. My apologies. So to Colin Liddell I should say: f**k that guy. I won’t ever again give a s**t what he thinks.

          You however were the guy who seemed intent on rubbing our noses in a stinking pile of Engelman.

          • Andy Nowicki

            I didn’t rub anyone’s nose in Engleman. I thought he was a troll, and a not terribly amusing one, but I think a better strategy would have been to ignore him. People got ridiculously triggered by the guy, in my view. Of course that all seems like it happened about a zillon years ago.

          • SLCain

            “I didn’t rub anyone’s nose in Engleman.”

            Yes, you did.

            “…,but I think a better strategy would have been to ignore him.”

            If a better strategy was to ignore him, then why didn’t you – you know – ignore him,……………………rather than give him a soap box on your forum? And why did you then insult damned near every one of your readers when they complained. As I recall, opposition to him was about 50-to-1 or more.

            A common complaint about cucks is that they won’t take their own side in an argument. Whites should start taking their own side, and one way of doing that is to not give your enemies (anti-whites) a platform. If a web site like Alternative Right isn’t pro-white, then what good is it?

          • Andy Nowicki

            How did I rub anyone’s nose in Engleman?

            If you’re referring to the article by him that was published at our site way back when, I had nothing to do with that, either.

            I also didn’t ban him, but as I explained above, I’m too technologically maladroit even to know how to do that. But I also generally don’t believe in banning people.

          • SLCain

            I seem to remember you defending Mr. Liddell’s actions, but I might be mistaken. Anyway, even if you didn’t do it, Alternative Right – the site – most certainly did give Engelman a platform and then insulted just about all it’s readers when they (overwhelmingly) took objection. I’ve noticed that the site seems to have scrubbed away all those comments.

            If you wonder why “THE FOUNDING SITE OF THE ALT-RIGHT” typically has comment counts in the single digits, that whole episode might have something to do with it.

          • Liddell

            Engelman wrote quite an interesting piece for us, which you can read here:

            I’d rather have one of these than a 1000 shitty butthurt troll comments.

          • SLCain

            I read it. I didn’t think it was ‘interesting’. I thought it was shit. A sentiment shared by – oh, approximately – nearly every single one of your readers. Engelman is an enemy of white people, as he has made clear with virtually everything he has written. And when your readers pointed that out to you, you insulted them. You told them, in effect: “get over it, and – by the way – donate money to us.”

            How many hits you get at your site these days? Based on the number of comments there, I’d guess ‘not many’. You’ve only yourself to blame.

      • SLCain

        Piece of work is a nice way of putting it. I would have characterized him as a piece of……….something else.

        He’s toe-fungus.

  • Ajudeo

    Falling Down…..

    Another Movie I need to watch again…….

    • silviosilver ✓ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ ˢᵘᵖᵖᵒʳᵗᵉʳ

      It’s pretty kiked, especially that bit in the military surplus store (the “Nazi” is hiding a canister of Zyklon B – gimme a break).

  • but how did academia and the media become so anti-white/pro-nonwhite? It all starts with the educational curriculum..that is where young minds are shaped, where worldviews are born….the child is the father of the adult….the establishment knows this…and so they shaped and molded the educational curriculum in order to shape and mold white adults….the center of the establishment educational curriculum is an anti-white version of history…that is the genesis of multiculti….those who control the past control the future….by presenting straight white males as the demons of history and everyone else as the angels of history, they shape and mold the worldviews of the adults-to-be….start there with your activism…

  • Simon_in_London

    “The more you tighten your grip, the more systems will slip through your fingers” – Leia Organa to Grand Moff Tarkin.

    The Left’s problem is that they can’t ever stop tightening, until more and more people reject their frame entirely.

    • WR_the_realist

      The best case for optimism is that more and more normie whites are realizing that the mass media has an agenda that is entirely against their best interests, and so cannot be trusted.