Aging Open Border Swedish Spinsters Are Sleeping With Their Migrant Boy-Toys

It turns out that some of the most hardcore (heh) supporters of open borders are also the only ones getting laid in the whole affair.

The trial against the so-called “Arboga-woman” has drawn attention to how middle-aged women in the asylum industry are having sex with refugee children. “We all do it”, says the testimony of an asylum woman on the left-wing site “Blankspot”.

Previously, the issue has mostly been discussed on sites like Flashback, where sexual relations between what users call “Dye witches” and refugee children have received extensive attention. But now it is the well-known Communist Martin Schibby’s website Blankspot, who has published a text in which an anonymous leftist-woman writes about how she takes home so-called “unaccompanied refugee children” from the Migration Board to her residence.

According to the woman’s text, sexual relations between women and so-called refugee children are extensive. In her text about one of her sex nights with a “unaccompanied refugee child” she writes:

“Enough with the sofa, he can join me in bed. I text a friend: “help – I have to take him (have sex) in my bed!”

Answer: “We all do it, calm down. This is how it is, give him closeness. That’s what you can do.” she writes in her text.

Academician and debater Ann Heberlein, who recently changed her views on immigration, writes in a comment that the text confirms how this behavior is fully accepted and systematized in the environment around the unaccompanied refugee children.

First of all, few of these refugees are children. Clarity in all things. Secondly, this is not surprising, even if it is stomach-turning. There are all the incentives in the world to cuck your posterity in the West, but Sweden has of course taken it to a whole new level.

Don’t forget Sweden actually pays people to take in refugees. So, not only do you get to virtue-signal, and have your boy-toy, but you get paid in the process? What a sweet deal.

Over on /pol/, one anon summed it up perfectly. Though he is just a lowly poster on the Chans, he has gotten to the heart of the problem with far more clarity than any think tank or NGO or government study ever could:

They’re basically using their position as guardians to meet desperate, sex-deprived, young men that would have sex with pretty much anything. They’re the women who would go on sex vacations to Ghana or Gambia to pay local men pennies to have sex with them. Now the Swedish government has brought them a smörgåsbord of young men, and they’re the ones getting paid to have sex with them.

Imagine if the government imported 150,000 16 year old girls from Thailand, and offered to pay old men shitloads of money to “take care of them”. What do you think would happen? This is basically what’s going on. These are the female versions of those old men who go on sex vacations to Thailand. Completely disgusting.

Yes, this is what happens when a significant portion of your population is comprised of bitter spinsters. Sound familiar?

The Bitter Hag March in DC

Many of these women left nothing to posterity. They made the wrong decisions and did not have children. As a result, their latent mothering instinct is triggered by the invaders. You see this a lot at pro-refugee events. Its the old women that go out and march for open borders, who defend their pets when they savagely lash out at society at large and in the process salt the earth from which the dwindling posterity of future generations will have to grow.

These human resources workers, social service workers, and indoctrinators teachers are the backbone of the anti-White agenda. They have become the active accomplices to our complete disenfranchisement.

And its not a phenomenon confined to Sweden so forget about these ridiculous theories about “pathological altruism”. No one is doing this out of altruism, the Swedes included. These women are lobbying for open borders to get laid, paid and applauded. Everyone makes something off this racket. From big business getting its cheap labor, to upper-class SWPLs getting to virtue-signal and rise relative to their less well-off prole White kin, to pensioners getting cheap nannies, and universities getting students from abroad that pay full rates, everyone is getting a buck or a bang out of all of this.

Except us.



  1. Mike Richard 8 June, 2017 at 22:34 Reply

    not shocked at all about this. When they lived the life of jumping from co*** to co*** in their 20s and they think it will last forever. But when they get old and warning out and hit that big wall. No men are willing to have sex with them no longer and now to they have to go for the leftovers and the table scraps.

  2. OCD 7 June, 2017 at 21:57 Reply

    Sweden is the canary in the coal mine. They will be the sacrificial lamb for all of Europe. I am sort of hoping for their collapse.

  3. Jack Burton 7 June, 2017 at 19:19 Reply

    “Feminist” Sweden raising the bar on competitive cucking: converts former facility to help female victims of rape to exclusively help migrant rapist men. You can’t make this stuff up.

  4. SLCain 7 June, 2017 at 09:26 Reply

    One of the London Bridge murderers of recent fame – the Morroccan – married an irish woman and fathered a child with her before getting his jihad on. In effect, he planted the flag in her womb, claiming it for the umma. No doubt the daughter will grow up to indentify with her father, and nurture a well-honed sense of ethnic grievance aimed at the west.

    • Jack Burton 7 June, 2017 at 19:24 Reply

      That’s what sub-Saharan subhumans do. They’re parasites infecting the host and doing as much damage as possible. They’re the biological weapons of the JWO.

    • White Devil 8 June, 2017 at 18:55 Reply

      You see that every time with Muslims, blacks, and hispanics. Their spawn NEVER identify as white. They always grasp at the identity of the oppressed, and are more anxious to claim minority-cred by being aggressively anti-white. The mixed children of even east asians, who are the most relaxed of all minorities, often have an “identity crisis.” They feel “lost” and still express alienation towards their white parent. Miscegenation always breeds anti-white hatred.
      Whites should stick with whites and expel migrant scum.

  5. Sir Richard of Wales 6 June, 2017 at 18:42 Reply

    this is absolutely sickening. if all swedish men have to do is service some cat ladies to save their country; the its time to get to work fellas!

  6. J_Bonaccorsi_Philadelphia 6 June, 2017 at 16:39 Reply

    According to Google Translate, the linked article (in Swedish) closes as follows:

    “Academician and Debate Ann Heberlein, who recently changed [her] views on immigration, writes in a comment that the text confirms how this behavior is fully accepted and systematized in the environment around the unaccompanied refugee children.

    “Heberlein also states that, as an employee and patient in the field of mental health, she can find that the Council, as the woman gets, to give an allegedly traumatized person sexual proximity, has no professional basis. What is happening in psychiatry can be that a caretaker gives a traumatic person a hug or takes his or her hand.

    “‘But sharing a bed? With a patient? No. It is to violate the patient’s physical integrity and actually commit an abuse of someone who is in a very vulnerable situation,’ writes Ann Heberlein.”

    So–Heberlein wouldn’t deny that the situation is problematic. It is, as she sees it, a violation–of the men.

  7. Foreverozone 6 June, 2017 at 15:27 Reply

    How ironic these older women are often called “old goats” lol Poor bastards …they can’t escape the goat fucking!

  8. Marathon-Youth 6 June, 2017 at 11:08 Reply

    If the older Swedish women are sleeping with refugee and migrant men then it is because they cannot get Swedish men. That is not going to go away.
    by doing that they also are open to men who will abuse or even kill them. Not all of these guys are dangerous but some will be for a whole bunch of reasons.

    When a woman is murdered by one of this men and Sweden treats the attack as a terrorist act then we should know that this attack happened because of the problem of lonely older Swedish women, a (Swedish) society incapable of dealing with issues of older women and the danger of relationships with refugee/ migrant men

  9. StraitlacedMissouri 6 June, 2017 at 09:28 Reply

    This is SO nasty. I can imagine it to be true through. I saw some idiotic have holding a BLM banner here in the US in a fairly affluent area. EVERY stinking one of them looked like an old spinster. I mean a real old woman would be to busy with family to even consider this trash!!! Sick freaks…

  10. altright_sobriquet 6 June, 2017 at 01:42 Reply

    The Fate of Empires – Sir John Glubb

    “The works of the contemporary historians of Baghdad in the early tenth century are still available. They deeply deplored the degeneracy of the times in which they lived, emphasising particularly the indifference to religion, the increasing materialism and the laxity of sexual morals. They lamented also the corruption of the officials of the government and the fact that politicians always seemed to amass large fortunes while they were in office.

    The historians commented bitterly on the extraordinary influence acquired by popular singers over young people, resulting in a decline in sexual morality. The ‘pop’ singers of Baghdad accompanied their erotic songs on the lute, an instrument resembling the modern guitar…

    An increase in the influence of women in public life has often been associated with national decline. The later Romans complained that, although Rome ruled the world, women ruled Rome. In the tenth century, a similar tendency was observable in the Arab Empire, the women demanding admission to the professions hitherto monopolised by men. ‘What,’ wrote the contemporary historian, Ibn Bessam, ‘have the professions of clerk, tax-collector or preacher to do with women? These occupations have always been limited to men alone.’ Many women practised law, while others obtained posts as university professors. There was an agitation for the appointment of female judges, which, however, does not appear to have succeeded.”

  11. SLCain 6 June, 2017 at 00:44 Reply

    Better that old women are seeing to the “sexual emergencies” of these muslim invaders, than that they make time with young white women. Of course, there’s no guarantee that they aren’t doing that too.

  12. Luke Mackay 5 June, 2017 at 23:33 Reply

    As an observation, I doubt 99% of the refugees would pay for their university education at all. Without a shadow of a doubt, it would be completely government subsidised. But it still proves your point as burgeoning uni numbers translates to even fatter government grants for the higher education system and swelling of the already enormous welfare system.

  13. Ryan McDonald 5 June, 2017 at 16:07 Reply

    “These women are lobbying for open borders to get laid, paid and applauded.”

    Great writing … 🙂

  14. Clark Kent 5 June, 2017 at 14:15 Reply

    Reminds me of my cousin.
    Successful late 30s Italian girl in good physical shape. She did everything right except find a man and have kids while she was young, and now when I go to her house she’s always watching some soap opera about rich black guys that don’t exist.
    If I didn’t know her well I’d think she’s the happiest girl on Facebook. But in real life she cries herself to sleep every night and realizes she’s probably going to die alone with nothing but a nice house.
    Feels bad man.

  15. Mittlandet 5 June, 2017 at 13:24 Reply

    “Dye witches” is a totally peculiar translation. The correct translation (of the Swedish word “batikhäxa”) is: batik witch.

    • Loetzen 6 June, 2017 at 18:19 Reply

      Not a lot of men are going to know what batik means, as it’s some soft of clothing/fashion (i.e., distaff) term. I myself had to look it up.

  16. harman1 5 June, 2017 at 12:57 Reply

    I simply DO NOT UNDERSTAND such disgusting behaviour from women of my race.
    The only upside to this is that they cannot reproduce and also they may prevent the rape of little white girls as an unwitting consequence.

  17. Smultronstället 5 June, 2017 at 12:44 Reply

    Radical Muslims are right about women: they must be submissive and obedient to men, kept out of politics, and disciplined if necessary. And since they are not equal to men they must not have equal rights to men. Women are essentially like dogs: sweet and nice and useful when they’re housebroken and leashed by their master, but if they are let loose and don’t get disciplined, they just eat and eat, get fat and destroy themselves and your home.

    • Hipster Racist 5 June, 2017 at 12:47 Reply

      Women should be submissive and obedient to their husbands, not “to men” in general. When that is made clear few worthwhile women have a problem with it, in fact most prefer it.

      • Smultronstället 5 June, 2017 at 12:59 Reply

        Women must socially and politically be in a submissive role; at least not in an equal role. (Sometimes I use the term “complementarian”, sometimes it feels too weasel-like to me, like desperately trying to prevent the term “patriarchy.”)

        A hierarchy apart of individualistic structures and apart of individual preferences must exist. A private hierarchy behind closed doors can easily be combined with bitchery outside the house; and it can easily be combined with being submissive to the “right” man only, only if the alpha man does the “right” thing, etc. Then you get Devlin’s “sexual utopia in power again.”

        Breitbart always said that politics is downstream of culture, Clinton said that she believes in laws. Clinton was mostly right. A “hard power” element of laws, simply outLAWing certain things has the most drastic effect on culture.

        • Hipster Racist 5 June, 2017 at 14:12 Reply

          Sex segregation fixes the problem nicely. We need men’s organizations, and obviously women have no “rank” in a men’s organization, thus no problem with bitches.

          However we shouldn’t get too far ahead of ourselves – let’s not play “White Nationalist Sim City.” Frankly one, even single and unmarried, attractive White woman making youtube videos is likely worth a hundred beta wankers whining in the comments section.

          In a traditional society, some young unmarried dude has no authority over a married grandmother respected by her family and the community, so beta wankers whining that “women should be submissive” are counter-productive.

          • Smultronstället 5 June, 2017 at 15:13

            In a traditional society, the young man would have the right to vote (admittedly, there are also other factors at play here, democracy, race, etc.) while the woman wouldn’t have the right to vote.

          • Hipster Racist 5 June, 2017 at 15:22

            In a traditional society only a married man with property could vote – and voting was a privilege and a duty granted in return for military service. You literally had to put your life on the line in defense of the tribe in order to have the privilege and duty of voting.

            Traditionally, men don’t get privileges and rights just for having a penis. They have to go through an initiation, they have to join the military, and they have to have the responsibility of a wife, children, and property.

            There really are online “manosphere” types that think because they are males they have some sort of “authority” over women in general – these are the ones complaining that, say, Lana Lokteff shouldn’t me making videos and she should be “in the kitchen” or whatever. These types are just trolls. They are the equivalent of the old biddies that used to whine that white men need to do something for them and cater to their whims just because they were women.

            I just don’t want to be misunderstood. I’m a sexist as well as a racist, but I don’t want to drive well meaning women from the cause (and the blogs) with premature “WN Sim City.”

            It’s all moot anyway as we’re just commenting online.

          • Smultronstället 5 June, 2017 at 15:32

            Privileges that could only be given to men. So biological sex was still a determining factor. Or consider the role of a pastor or priest. These were also male-only roles that obviously had a certain amount of power and authority over women.

          • Hipster Racist 5 June, 2017 at 15:38

            Male privileges and rights must come with male duties. There is no free ride for simply being a biological male.

            Some young punk ordering around a respected grandmother would be put down by her husband and her sons and her grandsons.

            This is all WN Sim City, though. You and I are both presumably men, but Lana Lokteff is far more valuable to the pro-white cause than either one of us. It wouldn’t be “traditional” of us to expect her to cater to or listen to what we have to say simply because our online avatars are male.

          • Jarod 5 June, 2017 at 17:42

            This was the case too in most European pre-Christian societies. Women were more than capable of having influence and gaining at least some authority. The key of course is having a unified race and culture.

            All the betas in the AltRight who scream about women being subservient are way too close to the Muslim mindset for my comfort.

      • Crud Bonemeal 5 June, 2017 at 13:36 Reply

        They can’t be allowed to run the society to the extent that they are today.

        The political influence of spinsters should be kept very low indeed

        • harman1 6 June, 2017 at 10:30 Reply

          Most women would fight like tigresses for their children,we constantly look to the future.The barren only look at the present.

  18. ForlornHope 5 June, 2017 at 12:21 Reply

    This behavior is so depraved and repulsive that initially I found it difficult to believe. Unfortunately, it appears to be all too true.

          • Billy Brown 5 June, 2017 at 23:26

            doesn’t matter I can still do that well for 30-50 yrs. plus ive been ready to go for 10 just don’t want the lone wolf nut stigma. im rdy when u r pussy

          • Billy Brown 6 June, 2017 at 14:32

            hell yeh ur a hero in my eyes and I hope u live as long as ur happy to do so. I just want people to start getting tough and be willing to do things they would never imagine cause that’s what it will take. most of these people are quite clever here but they never hunted butchered or fought in their lives

      • Billy Brown 5 June, 2017 at 20:35 Reply

        I know u would b so upset about ur mommy and gamgam but why should able men feed them realistically? can u feed them and still serve ur country at the same time? I mean republicans are bad but old women vote democrat. their voting is killing Europe and ruining the future. I know ideally no1 wants to put people down like sick dogs but please tell me why im wrong other than moral reasons? my duty is to make sure people stop acting like pussies. we all eat meat. we are all killers. war is the only solution to tyranny

  19. Trainspotter 5 June, 2017 at 11:41 Reply

    Excellent article. It’s important to see that our most committed opponents aren’t mere “do-gooders,” but are instead overwhelmingly self-interested. Virtually all of their motives are repugnant, whether they be pathetic mudshark cougars or (((those))) motivated entirely by anti-white malice.

  20. Hipster Racist 5 June, 2017 at 10:40 Reply

    A couple of years ago when I wrote “manosphere” type stuff I pointed this out consistently: older women, those without families or who have abandoned their families, are some of the most functionally anti-white actors in our societies, for obvious, self-interested reasons.

    There was a faction of “WN feminists” who were complaining about “manosphere” type sentiments, and I said they were poison to the movement and we should ignore old women completely and focus, laser like, on young fertile women when thinking of “ingroup vs. outgroup” dynamics and recruiting to the cause.

    Older White women with families, White husbands and White children and White grandchildren, are some of the most radical and pro-White of all, so obviously they are a completely different category.

    It was the spinsters and divorcees who were constantly whining and demanding to be “white knighted” and although they would posture as “radically pro-white” it was merely to get attention from young men online.

    The two groups disenfranchised by the sexual revolution are older women and young “beta” men – so it’s no surprise those are the two groups constantly trolling each other online.

    Fortunately everyone seems to get this now, things have apparently worked themselves out. We have a whole new crop of young White women joining the cause and they are some of the most pro-tradition and pro-White of all and we should welcome them with open arms – they are the ones we should be “white knighting.”

    • Monarchism 5 June, 2017 at 11:06 Reply

      Yes but we should also push them to have children. Having women in the movement is good, but they should be role models and set an example.

      • Hipster Racist 5 June, 2017 at 11:11 Reply

        Well, “we” can’t exactly push them to have children – their husbands will be the ones pushing them to have children. There is a whole new crop of White women that are mentoring the younger White women to get married and have children now – they didn’t exist four years ago, except for a handful of not anti-white Christian women. Now they are all over the place.

        It’s a good development and I think it resolved the whole issue about “how do we get more women in the pro-white movement.”

        • harman1 5 June, 2017 at 12:59 Reply

          I completely agree.Attending Nationalist movements in England I was always confronted by men,this is a very welcome change.I am now one of many!Yes,we are the most radical.

      • harman1 9 June, 2017 at 02:26 Reply

        That’s almost Biblical.I don’t have a problem with that,but we may be called upon to fight also?

    • Smash Islamophobia 5 June, 2017 at 12:11 Reply

      “There was a faction of “WN feminists” who were complaining about “manosphere” type sentiments, and I said they were poison to the movement and we should ignore old women completely and focus, laser like, on young fertile women when thinking of “ingroup vs. outgroup” dynamics and recruiting to the cause.”

      Well, when it comes to reproduction, I suppose they’re correct. And young single women vote very pro-immigration. But no young woman has the institutional power of someone like Merkel. Of course, the way to prevent this, in the long run, to support and promote marriage and family– easier said than done, but there’s a reason why feminists are always on about “slut-shaming.” It works.

      • Hipster Racist 5 June, 2017 at 12:25 Reply

        In America most young single women don’t vote at all, most aren’t even registered to vote. The idea is that to appeal to women, we shouldn’t be “nice” or “white knight” women just because they are women. Taking up the cause of, say, free birth control pills isn’t going to get us anywhere useful.

        Instead, men should boldly and openly advance the interests of the White race, and the worthwhile women will come along for the ride. There used to be a loud and noisy “WN” faction that would say, “don’t read manosphere sites like Roissy, you’ll drive the women away!” They would get into arguments with the younger “manosphere” types who in their own way really did drive away women. The “betas” and “cucks” who always whine that White women “secretly want Black men” are the flip side of the old spinsters frankly.

        I just mean we should promote normal, healthy White communities and family formation. It’s likely a moot point now anyway, I think we won that particular fight. The “WN feminist” faction dropped out and the obnoxious cuck manosphere types that constantly whine that White chicks really want black men are increasingly called out for the cuck fantasies.

        So it’s all good, we’re winning. Things have taken a turn for the better.

        • Smash Islamophobia 5 June, 2017 at 14:23 Reply

          Yeah, I see what you mean. Absolutely. You don’t draw women in by catering to them ideologically. Of course.

          • Hipster Racist 5 June, 2017 at 18:59

            I pretty much agree with the points, but I’m on a roll so I’m going to nitpick about something.

            The American “Alt Right” shouldn’t be a subculture. It should be a political movement and a meta-political movement. “White” is a very broad category. We should not expect all “Alt Right” people to share the same culture, listen to the same music, or otherwise even be friends with each other.

            We do need a professional activist cadre and we need plenty of non-professional part time people doing activism as well. But at the end of the day we need lots of regular people, people who aren’t involved in any activism, but who simply agree with our positions.

            I kind of cringe when I read people talking about “finding an altright girlfriend” or even a friend group that is altright. It’s kind of a terrible idea to find friends online that all agree with you then have IRL meetups. That is like building a cult. Don’t people just have regular friends in real life, not internet friends? Friends that may or may not agree with you politically but you can influence to some degree?

            Young men likely shouldn’t even worry about finding an “Alt Right” girlfriend – they should find a girlfriend and lead – in a good relationship she’ll want to follow your lead and she’ll likely come around to your viewpoint naturally.

            All political movements have the problem of people using it as a substitute for a real friends and family group – they tend to be a problem for movements and are often more trouble than they are worth.

            But the advice you posted is right on for an activist cadre of full time and part time people.

          • Arthur Vickstrom 5 June, 2017 at 23:11

            Good points, HR. I definitely agree that the advice I posted mostly applies to the girlfriends of professional activists, not random women.

            As for why so many young men want ‘AltRight girlfriends’, I think a big part of it is that many of these men feel socially alienated and they simply cannot relate to the culture they see around them. At that point, socializing with ‘normies’ becomes annoying. However, trying to withdraw from society doesn’t normally end well and shouldn’t be encouraged. At least not at this point in our struggle.

            My own advice to young guys who want a traditional wife is to network, be out-going, socialize, go to Church (trust me, the Church ladies will try to hook you up with their granddaughters), and just have fun with it.

            If you’re a bit more adventurous, go #fullWhiteNationalist in front of a liberal chick. A lot of them love it and the entire romp will be good fun.

          • harman1 6 June, 2017 at 01:08

            Most women want ‘men’,an alpha male.Natural selection has always worked,those wanting rapefugees in their countries are lacking in natural feelings for their own.Don’t go there.The majority of women are still looking for their knight,romance is still uppermost in most women’s minds.We need high quality ‘breeders’

          • Mark Neusted 30 September, 2017 at 18:32

            Take into account that because the west failed it’s worst shit test ever, feminism.
            By allowing this ideology to take root, we have consented to systematic feminization of men, mascularization of women and at long last, thrir ultimate goal, population replacement.

            By the way…has anyone wondered why there is so much estrogen in food?
            Its so that men get feminized as early as possible, as well as to hasten the development in young women, so they can be passed off as legit for the rapefugees. The state is accomodating the living conditions for all the rapefugees that come to the west. They feminize western men so the rapefugees would go unopposed, they indoctrinate women to hate their own kin and the state criminally prosecute patriots and taxates us to death so we can cover the bills for our own demographic demise.

        • DaveMD ✓ᴺᵃᵗᶦᵒᶰᵃˡᶦˢᵗᴰʳ 5 June, 2017 at 20:23 Reply

          Dating site statistics bear out what we know to be true – among both Asian and White women, White men are the most attractive ( To the extent that White women are choosing those of other races, I’d say that most of the problem could be solved by White boys and men growing up. That means playing outside and socializing instead of playing video games in middle and high school. Pursuing practical vocations or majoring in something useful in college. Etc.

          • Armed with Knowledge 5 June, 2017 at 20:56

            Snore. Same old line. There are plenty of driven males at universities and there always have been plenty of driven males at universities. The point is women aren’t latching onto them because everything is telling them not to. After university, that does not change. The article shows this clearly. If they wanted to be wives to the smartest and richest, ex. their former classmates who became highly-educated professionals, they would. They do not want that. They want hard sex with young men with stamina. Nature or not, nothing in the culture has told them otherwise. And everything in the culture has only reinforced this.

          • A hymn to Hermes 6 June, 2017 at 01:26

            The dynamics of white women mating with non-whites aren’t reliant upon white men “growing up”. There is typically something else going on with these women and their environment. They fundamentally aren’t going to be attracted to Dudley Do-Right who made all of the responsible choices. You’d be better off getting a neck tattoo and slapping them around. Or…well…you wouldn’t be better off unless your only aspiration was getting laid by unhinged white chicks.

            Some of them are probably more stable but would still require hyper-aggressive harassment to land, and wouldn’t stick around after that 3-4 year high. Most white guys will pass these women by because we have too much ego to engage in a type of courtship which brushes this close to rape.

          • DaveMD ✓ᴺᵃᵗᶦᵒᶰᵃˡᶦˢᵗᴰʳ 6 June, 2017 at 01:33

            I agree with your post, for the most part. With that said, there seems to be something missing in today’s Westerners WRT balance between mind/ambition and body. Mens Sana in corpore sano. In the British Empire, for instance, gentlemen were expected to study the Classics and speak well, but also learned fencing, hunting, and so on. The New Right appears to aspire to this ideal, and this approach must percolate to White society at large for Whites to regain control of their destiny.

          • Luke Mackay 6 June, 2017 at 00:09

            I rarely meet single women who are interested in actually getting out and voting, they only feign an interest in politics to show they are intelligent.

          • Billy Brown 6 June, 2017 at 14:43

            and I wonder how many single girls the 4 of you know had nothing better to do that day out of the 20million potential young girl voters. no I actually don’t I just wanted to ask hipster to back up his nonsense for sassing me on another comment but its over now. carry on men

        • Jay Hart 12 June, 2017 at 15:47 Reply

          “In America most young single women don’t vote at all, most aren’t even registered to vote.” – Not voting is probably the only worthwhile contribution to society that Western women will ever make. After all, it’s an irrefutable fact that Women’s Suffrage was the worst mistake the West ever made, and that women should be blamed disproportionately for many of the West’s problems. Women’s for LEFT. Bigger government, increased spending, liberalism, open borders, etc. The planet Venus is an example of a runaway greenhouse effect. (sulfuric acid for rain, 900F temperature, atmospheric pressure 90X that of Earth, etc) Sweden is a working scale model of runaway feminism. They are literally destroying their country. They’ve turned it into a Muslim/migrant cesspool, the Rape Capital of Europe, rape & crime is up by 1,000%, and Sweden will be a 3rd World country by the year 2030. (according to the U.N.) Feminist society & future is an oxymoron, as it’s unsustainable in the long run. That’s why we’ve never seen a feminist civilization except for very short periods at the END of great empires. Women have been given too much freedom. I’m not saying we should go back to treating women like property, but there must be an even balance they doesn’t have to end with the destruction of Western society in the name of “gender equality’.

    • harman1 6 June, 2017 at 01:12 Reply

      Perhaps they are just sad and DESPERATE women who resent the fact that ‘their’ men have rejected them.Whenever I see a white woman with an alien it offends me.I always think of her as a reject,she has gone for a low value alien because she has no status in her racial sphere?

      • White Devil 8 June, 2017 at 18:41 Reply

        I wonder. My impression is that most of these whores are lonely single old hags. They were probably young and promiscuous in the 60s-80s, then hit the Wall thereabouts, and have been sexually frustrated ever since. Considering these boys are homeless, and often illiterate, or don’t speak Western languages, and are far from home: this is obviously a predacious relationship. These old feminist witches are exploiting their exploited sex-slaves.

        • harman1 9 June, 2017 at 02:25 Reply

          Ha Ha you could be right but I think they must be desperate to the nth degree?I cannot imagine the disgustingness of these creatures?The smells,lack of hygiene and varied animal behaviours?My imagination knows no bounds!

  21. Arthur Vickstrom 5 June, 2017 at 10:35 Reply

    So it’s old, unwanted birds who are sleeping with the migrants?

    Can’t say I’m surprised. Young, attractive White women really do want confident, alpha-male White men. Even with all of the propaganda against us – and our governments beating us down – it’s still mostly the undesirable White women who sleep with these people.