Perspective

Neoliberalism Is Hell-Bent On Destroying The White World

Last week, Bloomberg View published an outrageous opinion piece titled “American Prosperity Depends on a Nonwhite Future,” with the subheading, “Without immigration, mostly of Hispanics and Asians, economic growth will falter.” In this simple and concise call for white demographic replacement, former finance professor Noah Smith lays out a view which, in any sane society, would be grounds for involuntary commitment to a psychiatric hospital, yet is accepted as a matter of course by virtually all points along the spectrum of elite opinion in the upside-down corporate dystopia in which we live. This argument must not only be challenged; the ideological basis for it must be utterly discredited and destroyed.

It isn’t enough to simply sound the alarm about “white genocide.” White genocide is the point, and this is frankly admitted by the political establishment and the mainstream media. They object to the term “white genocide” as being alarmist and hyperbolic, but we agree on what that term describes: the gradual depopulation of the United States of communities of European descent, and their replacement with new populations of Africans, Asians and Hispanics. This outcome is not even disputed by elites, and is basically accepted, or at least not vigorously opposed, by a much larger share of docile and depoliticized white America than many in the Alt-Right would care to admit.

It also isn’t enough to point out the factual inaccuracies and false premises contained within this Neoliberal argument. For example, the author claims “Fertility is below replacement levels, and no country has discovered a way to raise native birthrates.” During the inter-war period, Germany successfully implemented a broad array of policies which dramatically increased the native German birthrate, such as the Ehestandsdarlehen or “marriage loans,” which were low-interest government mortgages to newlywed couples. One-quarter of the debt was forgiven for each child born, so that upon having four children, a married couple of German descent would own their home outright.

The committed Neoliberal economist is unwilling to even consider the past or possible future achievements of an illiberal ethnostate, supposedly for moral and political reasons. This exposes the Neoliberal’s apparently technocratic appeal to “new data” as a thin rationalization for a vision not rooted in science, but in ideology. And this is to be expected: Neoliberal economists and politicians are naturally going to distort facts, Soviet-style, to paint a picture of prosperity which does not actually exist in American towns and households, as all ruling powers do. It is important to contest these facts, but we must never get so bogged down in the tit-for-tat dispute over isolated data points that we leave untouched the monstrous core of Neoliberal ideology itself.

Neoliberalism is nothing but capitalism elevated to the highest ideal of human life. It is the ideal of money and wealth placed over all culture, spirituality, honor and justice. It is the enshrining of calculating greed as the highest of all human motives. It is Mammonism triumphant. It is a disgusting and ignoble creed, yet it is the dominant philosophy of all major world leaders and institutions in the West. If we are to demolish the arguments of Neoliberal economists calling for greater nonwhite immigration, we must drag this vile system of anti-values down from its position of smug self-glorification and force it to look itself in the mirror.

And what does the hideous reflection of Neoliberalism reveal? In its earlier incarnation, it was the owner of sweatshops and the slave-driver of child labor. It fattened a corrupt and decadent oligarchy by crushing the lives of working people and by deforesting and plundering the vast natural riches of the United States. Its short-sighted greed brought millions of African slaves to this continent, and later drove vast hordes of them into all-white Northern cities to lower the cost of industrial labor. In Appalachia, the latest ravages of Neoliberalism include the practice of Mountaintop Removal Mining: literally the process of blowing up mountains which are millions of years old, smashing them to powder and turning one of the oldest mountain ranges in the world into a flattened moonscape of lifeless devastation.

To the Neoliberal oligarchs, the mystical, ancient mountains and pristine forests of Appalachia do not hold any intrinsic value: they only have value inasmuch as they are able to increase the wealth of individual capitalists. The same single-minded greed powers the drive to increase nonwhite immigration into the United States: preserving the unique genetic core of the European peoples, the wellspring of all Western civilization and culture, is not even a consideration to the senseless destructiveness of the capitalist.

Neoliberalism never thinks about the future. If we flatten our forests, poison our air and water, or eradicate the seed of our own children, what does it matter, so long as profits are up in the short term? Through this logic, the false environmentalism of the elites is revealed: no thought is given to what importing millions of Asians and Hispanics from the overpopulated third world will do to the smog-choked, congested and endlessly expanding sprawl of our overcrowded cities and suburbs. At the same time, the idea that a future nonwhite majority in the United States might simply vote to no longer contribute to the Social Security system or pension funds of “evil, racist” white America, never seems to occur to the Neoliberal mind.

We in the Alt-Right are the only true opposition to Neoliberalism, and we oppose it completely and totally. Unlike the self-styled “progressive” Left, we don’t simply critique the excesses of Neoliberalism from a materialistic, individualistic standpoint based on the same premises. We believe in “holiness and in heroism,” in values which have no economic motive whatsoever. We know that the mountains and forests of our land have an intrinsic value, not merely as “natural resources,” but in themselves and for their own sake. And if this is true of the sacred land conquered and settled by our people, how much more it is true of the sacred blood of our ancestors, of the unique shape and form and inner character of our ancient, glorious European race?

The great failing of Neoliberalism, like “the tragedy of Lucifer,” is that it is driven to destroy itself. The Neoliberal system only survives by bastardizing the process of natural selection and applying this to human markets. But by destroying the life-supporting building blocks of those markets, it prepares the way for its own downfall. That downfall almost happened once before, and Neoliberalism escaped the crisis only by temporarily switching to a socialist war economy and utterly annihilating and occupying its successful nationalist rivals with naked military force. The decadence of Neoliberal consumerism has destroyed any basis on which it could win another such war, and the advantages gained by that act of world plunder have almost run out. When the bubble of Neoliberal markets and false, debt-fueled “prosperity” bursts, the system will come face to face with the reality of its own unsustainability, and in that moment, we are the ones who will charge in to finish it off – once and for all.

349 Comments

  • The average person in the West today, deliberately dumbed down by government “education” programs, will believe ANYTHING–even that he must sacrifice himself and his race or gender to the whims of Orwell’s “ruling pigs.”

  • If women have the power to reject the men they don’t want in their lives – and the rejects have to accept the women’s decision and go away – then why don’t white people have the power to reject and turn away the people from other tribes we don’t want in our countries?

    • The Constitution and enlightenment ideals that proclaim the worth of and humanitarian value of individuals over that of ethnic & racial distinctions.

      Women have the power to reject men because women are people.

  • It’s very sad to see how committed some are to this hateful, inhuman ideology. “All Gentiles are the same– they are mere interchangeable parts. It’s the economy that matters, after all. Shekels > people. Everyone knows that.” Very sad that they are so unwilling to give up their hatred.

  • Neoliberalism is just a form of the classical liberalism of the Founders. Surely in reality they adhered to slavery and racism, but in the theory of their ideology all men were created equal. Not equal in the sense that every man had the same capabilities, but equal in the sense that every man can kill.

    The difference between the alt-right’s fascism and the neoliberal adherence to founding ideals; is that fascists believe the ability to kill forces conflict and dominance over other people.

    Neoliberal adherence to founding ideals of enlightenment espouse that the ability to kill necessitates tolerance and legal equality that dampens the necessity to kill and engage in a infinite national conflict.

  • Fascism isn’t an ideology that uses science, it tries to invent science and pseudo-science that furthers nationalist and racialist beliefs that justify destruction of human rights.

    The idea that certain groups of people need to be protected because they’re the organic glue of society, imagines that their superiority is necessary over other people. A slave & master mentality has never been what grew America, a mentality of freedom to succeed for anyone is what grew America.

    • Your pathetic inability to provide even the tiniest shred of empirical support for your race-denialist assertions is again noted.

      • You want me to post historical proof that Nazis and fascists used pseudo-science to justify genocide and racial superiority?

        No thanks, I’m not your history teacher, who was obviously terrible at their job.

        • Your pathetic inability to provide even the tiniest shred of empirical support for your race-denialist assertions is again noted, as is your odd conflation of the disciplines of biology and history. Is that how they teach sociology these days? Or did you learn that one in “Gender Studies?”

          • You’ve basically displayed a complete ignorance of history. A complete ignorance of basic economics. A complete ignorance of basic anthropology and biology. A complete ignorance of enlightenment ideals and ideology.

            For the record, I don’t like sociologists much either, there are too many of economically ignorant Marxists among them spouting nonsense. Very much like you in fact.

          • Your pathetic inability to provide even the tiniest shred of empirical support for your race-denialist assertions is again noted. Typical cultural anthropologist. Your professions of blind faith in the progressive establishment narrative are not evidence. You’re like a flat-earther, whimpering “I don’t care! The earth is flat because I say it is! You don’t believe me because you hate flatness, you bigot!” lol

            Let’s review the most basic points that I have demonstrated so far, that you have so pathetically failed to contest, shall we?

            1. Race is a real, biological category.

            2. The US was explicitly founded as a White nation.

            3. Your feeble, irrational attempts at deconstruction are directed entirely at the White race, never at Blacks, or jews, or “Hispanics” (a far less coherent category, by the way).

          • You’ve basically displayed a complete ignorance of history. A complete ignorance of basic economics. A complete ignorance of basic anthropology and biology. A complete ignorance of enlightenment ideals and ideology.

            Your fascist refusal to accept reality is your own failing.

          • Your complete, pathetic failure to support your “arguments” empirically, as well as your blind faith in the powers of unsupported assertions, of purely-theoretical constructs, of “word magic” over reality, is… (((interesting))).

            Let’s review the most basic points that I have demonstrated so far, that you have so pathetically failed to contest, shall we?

            1. Race is a real, biological category.

            2. The US was explicitly founded as a White nation.

            3. Your feeble, irrational attempts at deconstruction are directed entirely at the White race, never at Blacks, or jews, or “Hispanics” (a far less coherent category, by the way).

          • You’ve basically displayed a complete ignorance of history. A complete ignorance of basic economics. A complete ignorance of basic anthropology and biology. A complete ignorance of enlightenment ideals and ideology.

            Your fascist refusal to accept reality is your own failing.

          • I can understand your blind, incoherent rage. You’re not used to seeing, or hearing, arguments that go against the sacred tenets of your progressive cult, and your response is, naturally, to attempt to suppress this obvious heresy, spewing reflexive declarations of fealty to your gurus and their nonsensical ideology, mingled with toxic anti-White hatred and Gentilephobia. Try to give up your hatred, fear, and anger. Try to be more tolerant. It will allow you to utilize your (limited) powers of reason more effectively, and to consider actual evidence, even if it conflicts with the beliefs of your cult.

            When you’ve calmed down, perhaps you can consider this:

            Let’s review the most basic points that I have demonstrated so far, that you have so pathetically failed to contest, shall we?

            1. Race is a real, biological category.

            2. The US was explicitly founded as a White nation.

            3. Your feeble, irrational attempts at deconstruction are directed entirely at the White race, never at Blacks, or jews, or “Hispanics” (a far less coherent category, by the way).

            And just for fun, do you support the destruction of the jewish nature of the state of Israel with the same enthusiasm that you support the destruction of the historic American nation? Why or why not?

          • You’ve basically displayed a complete ignorance of history. A complete ignorance of basic economics. A complete ignorance of basic anthropology and biology. A complete ignorance of enlightenment ideals and ideology.

            Your fascist refusal to accept reality is your own failing.

          • Your continued refusal (inability?) to engage with reality, as opposed to your cult beliefs, is telling. Let go of your irrational anger and hatred for just a moment.

            Let’s review the most basic points that I have demonstrated so far, that you have so pathetically failed to contest, shall we?

            1. Race is a real, biological category.

            2. The US was explicitly founded as a White nation.

            3. Your feeble, irrational attempts at deconstruction are directed
            entirely at the White race, never at Blacks, or jews, or “Hispanics” (a
            far less coherent category, by the way).

            Go ahead. Make a feeble attempt at empirically-based argumentation. How can you learn to do it if you never try?

            And just for fun, do you support the destruction of the jewish nature of the state of Israel with the same enthusiasm that you support the destruction of the historic
            American nation? Why or why not?

          • You’ve basically displayed a complete ignorance of history. A complete ignorance of basic economics. A complete ignorance of basic anthropology and biology. A complete ignorance of enlightenment ideals and ideology.

            Your fascist refusal to accept reality is your own failing.

          • You’re welcome adduce even the tiniest shred of actual evidence (as opposed to regurgitated Far Left slogans) at any point now. Your pathetic inability to contest the points that I so plainly established above on any kind of valid empirical grounds speaks for itself.

            But hey, I’m a reasonable man, and willing to make allowances for your obvious deficiencies. I’ll allow you to choose just one. How about attempting a defense of your faith-based race denialism with some sort of actual evidence, rather that appeals to authority, simple slogans, or (((deconstruction)))?

            You can’t even do that, can you? Sad.

  • The Alt Right makes empirically testable claims about the conditions of white flourishing. Progressives and liberals have the burden of proof to show that their utopian social engineering regarding blacks, Mexicans and other lumpen-groups won’t make white people’s lives worse; yet they can’t seem to come up with anything better than hand-waving about the wonders of ethnic restaurants, cheaper vegetables and “diversity.”

      • Are you willing to give up your rabid anti-White hatred and toxic Gentilephobia? Or are you still mindlessly committed to your genocidal intolerance?

      • Do you have empirical evidence that your diversitarian proposals will make white people’s lives better?

        • The history of America is empirical evidence that ethnic diversity and an open market place create economic growth and drive living standards.

          Creating racial distinctions is really post-facto justification to exclude other racial groups, similar to previous movement’s attempts to exclude other ethnic groups.

          • So you’re talking about the history of a country that was explicitly founded as a White nation? One that was 90% White in 1960? Top kek.

            Do you support open borders and “multiculturalism” for Israel, the way you so enthusiastically do for America?

          • So you think the Irish, Italians, English, French, and Germans of the Early Republic were all one culture?

            Those were all different cultures, hence multiculturalism. Imagining that all White Europeans love and trust each other is yet another failure to understand history outside of White American racism.

          • So you think that the Sephardim, Mizrahim, and Ashkenazim are all one culture, with absolutely no differences between them?

            Do you support open borders and “multiculturalism” for Israel, the way you so enthusiastically do for America?

            You can try to support your irrational race-denialist beliefs with actual evidence at any point now…

          • Israeli Constitutional law is not American Constitutional law that is steeped in Classical Liberal ideals of equality.

          • Heh. You make your usual feeble attempt to “deconstruct” the White race, then get flustered when I merely ask the same question about the Tribe, so you try to change the subject from race to paper. Sad.

          • Your open admission that (((deconstruction))) is a tool that is only used against the White race, not other groups, and your irrational faith in the powers of the Blank Slate and the Magic Dirt are duly noted.

        • He’s a postmodernist. Empirical evidence is “racist” and a symbol of “White privilege.” Just something to be “deconstructed.” Only the (((theoretical construct))) matters.

        • It’s pretty funny that you guys think you have any intellectual or social cache to shame anyone.

          • “It’s pretty funny that you guys think you have any intellectual or social cache”
            Our cachet is hidden in a secret cache somewhere, apparently.

    • Does your husband/brother/father know you’re using the internet unsupervised? Shouldn’t you be doing something useful, like baking bread or knitting socks?

  • Two thoughts:

    1. Though I have yet to hear a convincing explanation as to when liberalism either stopped–or started–being liberalism, I’m glad Spencer if finally catching on to liberalism’s existential threat.

    2. As for “growth”, right now, proving exactly what liberals really think about the environment, three thousand acres of farmland, forests, and ranchland are taken permanently out of commission every single day to make way for the “growth” we have now. It’s proof that few things are more hateful to liberals than unpaved land–at least where white Americans live.

  • “Neoliberalism is nothing but capitalism elevated to the highest ideal of
    human life. It is the ideal of money and wealth placed over all
    culture, spirituality, honor and justice. It is the enshrining of
    calculating greed as the highest of all human motives. It is Mammonism
    triumphant.”

    https://infogalactic.com/info/Economism

    A concept shared, interestingly, by paleocons… and Marxists.

  • Remarkable that people still exist who dare to blaspheme against the establishment doctrines of the Blank Slate and the Magic Dirt in the current year. Why, everyone knows that people are mere interchangeable cogs– it’s the economy that mattters.

  • Ahh the alt-right, doubling down of historically disastrous policies that special people make a country great.

    America is about ideas that assimilate nations from every corner of the world to build country of freedom that unites to protect itself.

    That’s on reason why the confederacy lost, the opportunities and freedom of the North attracted more immigrants to fight than White Supremacists.

    • The immigrants you are referring to were all European, or more specifically WASP’s. America was never meant to be a dumping ground for the entirety of the third world.

        • I’m well aware, being Italian and not a WASP. I don’t see how it is an arbitrary racial distinction though. Italians are European and Christian. Them immigrating to a predominantly WASP country is hardly the same thing as boat loads of Arabs immigrating here, who share nothing in common with the existing population.

          • The same arguments against Muslims were once used against Papists and Italian anarchist terrorists who were destroying peaceful WASP society.

          • Anarchist terrorists? Citation needed!

            The Mafia was a real threat that came to America with Italian immigration, I acknowledge that. And the biggest lynching in US history was against Italians, not blacks, but you never hear us whining about it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/March_14,_1891_lynchings

            Catholics and Protestants have always been in conflict with each other, but I don’t recall Catholics going into a Protestant church and slitting a priests throat during their Sunday service, as happened recently in Normandy France, by a Muslim. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3708394/Two-men-armed-knives-people-hostage-French-church.html

            You know what they did to Italians in America and Canada during WWII? Cut off immigration and sent us to internment camps. Apologies and reparations were payed to the Japanese during the Reagan administration, but never the Italians or Germans. Why is that? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italian-Canadian_internment

            Muslims are the most privileged immigrant group to ever come to America or Canada. They have nothing to complain about. And if your looking for me to sympathize with them, you’ve come to the wrong place. REMOVE KEBAB!!

          • “The Mafia was a real threat that came to America with Italian immigration, I acknowledge that.”

            Strange that this is such a well-known association, yet the (((Purple Gang))), and (((Murder Incorporated))), and (((Meyer Lansky))) and their co-ethnics are given so little credit for their role in organized crime in this country. Not in movies, or on TV, or in popular literature, or the news… Very odd. Almost “anti-semitic” or something. Even more recently, no one seems to want to give proper credit to those behind the (((Russian Mafia))). Seems very unfair to give the chosen people so little acknowledgement for their accomplishments in this arena.

          • Good point. The Mafia has been prevalent in Italian society and they did bring it to America with them. But that isn’t to say that America was free of organized crime prior to Italian immigration. America was free of Radical Islamic Terrorism before Islam had a presence in America.

            And as far as the Italians who did engage in crime or Anarchist terrorism, they were treated like criminals and terrorists, not an oppressed victim group that is in need of charity and understanding. My people didn’t get it then, and I refuse to give it to Muslims now.

          • And those arguments were proved to be right. You take for granted the very things the alt-right questions.

          • Right, because there was always a constituency claiming that anarchist terrorists were actually a benefit to society.

        • It’s always comical to see the sociology and English majors weigh in with their race-denialist delusions about Muh SCIENCE! You appear to be confusing the tenets of the progressive cult with actual science. Your feeble attempt at proselytism is amusing, but allow me to assist you with your ignorance:

          On the scientific validity of race:

          Humans can be genetically categorized into five racial groups, corresponding to traditional races.
          https://web.stanford.edu/group/rosenberglab/papers/popstruct.pdf

          “Human genetic variation is geographically structured” and corresponds with race.
          http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15508000

          Race can be determined via genetics with certainty for >99.8% of individuals.
          http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15625622

          Oral bacteria can be used to determine race.
          http://medicalxpress.com/news/2013-10-oral-bacteria-fingerprint-mouth.html

          Race can be determined via brain scans (i.e. brain structure differs at the macro level between races):
          http://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822(15)00671-5

          • Your pathetic inability to provide even the tiniest shred of empirical support for your irrational, quasi-religious, race-denialist beliefs is duly noted.

          • Reading comprehension problems? Or are you still confused on the definition of “baseless assertions,” as opposed to that of “science?” (Hint– science is what I cited above. You’re welcome)

          • Your arguments are not science. You’re just parroting the same liberal clap trap you learned in college, or in your social circles.

          • Written posts Atlantic, where his “smug and self-righteous gloating” feels at home. 😉

          • My smug self-gloating is right at home here, you should all be used to it by now, seeing as how you have to deal with it every day in real life.

          • Heh. You’re getting trounced by a champion, and it’s a real pleasure to read. 🙂

          • Of course a room of fascists agrees with the fascist citing bad history, debunked economics, and racially laughable science.

          • Refute? Society has refuted all of these arguments. I’m just here for kicks.

          • And there it is, “society” doesn’t like these arguments. Boo hoo, troll.

          • Doesn’t like these arguments? I’m not your biology, anthropology, history, or economics professor and I’m not qualified to be.

            I’m also not your professor on political theory, constitutional theory, or history. If you don’t know this stuff, you don’t want to know it and if you don’t want to know it, why should I care?

            Society believes fascism is wrong and you are engaged in fascism. That’s really all there is to it.

          • Yawn. You still haven’t refuted a single one of Smash’s arguments. If you could, you would. But you can’t, so you troll others. Boring.

          • I don’t care if you all want to sit around saying gravity doesn’t exist.

          • Except you’re the one said “gravity doesn’t exist”. Typical prog, presents a straw man, declares himself a winner. If you didn’t care, you wouldn’t be here. Still boring, troll.

          • Society has refuted all of these arguments

            Has it? How has ‘society’ done that then? Has it proved that disparate racial groups will form a more harmonious society than a homogeneous one? Has it refuted issues of unequal IQ distribution, disparate crime etc?

          • Yes, society has done it and explained it. Your refusal to accept what has been found by the most educated and respected of society, is your ideal through ignorance or denial.

          • Makes sense. You see a lot of people commenting there who are verbally fluent, but the very concept of empirically-based reasoning seems to be completely alien to them, at least in this area. Yet if someone tried to tell them the earth was flat, would they rely solely on appeals to authority and/ or social proof (“everyone knows the earth is an oblate spheroid”), backed up with random ad hominems, accusations of “shapism,” and attempts to deconstruct the social construct of “flatness?” Or could they, in that case, actually muster evidence for their positions? One wonders.

            It is kind of depressing to see how 95%+ of The Atlantic commenters fell in line unquestioningly with the Russia conspiracy theory. Some of them question the establishment Syria narrative, but the “Russia remotely controlled the US election?” Forget it. Doesn’t say much for their critical thinking skills. Or perhaps it reflects their susceptibility to argument from authority, or their desperate need for social acceptance.

          • You idiots are convinced we think we are superior. We know we are different. That is all that really matters. Superiority is merely a perspective that depends on the position of the viewer. I don’t care to fight about who is superior. I care to fight about what is best for my group, just as every other group has the same right and duty.

          • They don’t “think” anything, really. It’s just a meme that they mindlessly parrot. Pure rhetoric, with zero informational content.

          • Legitimate knowledge of failed fascist beliefs and faulty racialist prejudice allows me to ridicule your side with impunity.

          • You’re welcome to make further contributions to the excellent job that you’re done so far, in demonstrating the reliance of the Far Left on merely parroting meaningless slogans, and their utter inability to grasp the concepts of either logic or empirical evidence. Or you could attempt to defend your dogmatic race-denialism with some actual evidence. Your choice.

          • You honestly think I’m far left? Neoliberals aren’t far-left. We’re more centrists. Some of us believe in a welfare state, but that hardly makes us far-left Marxists that want workers to own the means of production or Stalinists that want the government to operate society.

            As for racialism, it’s hard to cite studies for something taught in intro anthropology and biology courses. Science is biology and genetics, not IQ tests as measures of racial oppression.

            There’s no genetic, biological, or evolutionary basis for racialism, just racism and pseudo-science created to justify racism.

            Nothing you cite justifies racism.

          • Your pathetic inability to adduce any actual evidence for your race-denialist cult beliefs speaks for itself, I’m afraid. “But they denied race in my (Boasian) cultural anthropology class! And on the TV, too! Facts? Empirical evidence? What’s that?”

            Top kek. You leftists should really learn to think, rather than just parrot the propaganda of your masters. And the “I’m a committed support of international finance capitalism! That means I’m a ‘centrist,’ no matter how much poz I push.” Hilarious

          • Constantly crying that your world view doesn’t match society’s world view is not a defense.

          • You misconstrue again (of course). Constantly crying “I have faith! You should have faith in what the TV tells you, just like me! My inability to provide even an iota of empirical support for my argument is actually proof of its validity!” is unlikely to convince those who actually possess powers of reason. You don’t even realize that, do you?

          • Attempting reason with fascists is like attempting science with flat-Earthers; it’s a waste of time because the justifications created go beyond science, history, or reason and into a series of fallacies designed to mimic science and reason.

            I was here to observe and take notes, but I wanted to see if any of you could follow the reasoning of the civil war outcome. None of you could and degenerated in racial hatred.

          • Let’s review the most basic points that I have demonstrated so far, that you have so pathetically failed to contest, shall we?

            1. Race is a real, biological category.

            2. The US was explicitly founded as a White nation.

            3. Your feeble, irrational attempts at deconstruction are directed
            entirely at the White race, never at Blacks, or jews, or “Hispanics” (a
            far less coherent category, by the way).

            You’re welcome to attempt to disprove these with actual evidence (as opposed to simple declarations of faith in the progressive establishment narrative) at any point. Surely you’ve notice that all of your “arguments” are based on purely-theoretical leftist constructs, and that you have been so far pitifully unable to tie them to real-world evidence in any way, shape, or form? You haven’t, have you? Typical of ideological fanatics, whether religious fundamentalists, Communists, or devoted acolytes of the progressive cult.

          • You are convinced you’re superior. Different is just the mechanism you use to justify nationalist separation. Ethnic nepotism was never a concern until it no longer explicitly benefited your group. Now that the table is far more even, you need to kick out all the players that are competing for middle class jobs.

            If you want what is best for your group, there are plenty of legal all-White settlements in South Africa that allow you to skirt the Constitutional and judicial protections of American society and start again as a special protected people.

          • Your continued irrational adherence to your radical Blank Slate, race-denialist dogma is merely a threadbare cover for your deep-seated anti-White hatred an Gentilephobia.

          • Diversity has worked in America since its founding. Racists have just found a new way to justify hating outsiders.

          • Oy vey. Does “ourselves and our posterity” ring a bell? What document was that from again? Or how about the Naturalization Acts of 1790 and 1795? Who qualified again? Oh, that’s right– “free white persons” of “good moral character.” At least make some kind of feeble attempt to back up your revisionism with some actual facts. This is like shooting fish in a barrel.

          • Oy vey. Please explain the ways in which your cult claims that Whites have evolved in the past 200 years to become not-White. Have Blacks also evolved over this same period of time to become not-Black? How about Jews? Are they now not-Jews?

            Not that any of this is relevant to your idiotic claim that “Diversity has worked in America since its founding.” You claimed that the US was not founded as a White nation. I demonstrated that your claim was patently false, so you retreat into the comfort of word salad. Typical leftist.

          • Cult claim? No, you can look back at history and the Know-Nothing’s and KKK’s hatred of the Irish, Italians, Eastern Europeans, Catholics, and Jews and see that America has evolved to accept lighter skinned people as acceptable.

            Where as darker skinned people are still subject to more violence from police, stereotypes of moral inferiority by juries, and occupational discrimination.

          • You’re just digging a deeper hole for yourself here, yet you lack the cognitive resources, and the ability to consider actual facts, rather than the narrative promoted by your cult, that might enable you to take the first baby steps upward from your dark abyss of ignorance. Very sad.

            Let’s review the most basic points that I have demonstrated so far, that you have so pathetically failed to contest, shall we?

            1. Race is a real, biological category.

            2. The US was explicitly founded as a White nation.

            3. Your feeble, irrational attempts at deconstruction are directed entirely at the White race, never at Blacks, or jews, or “Hispanics” (a far less coherent category, by the way).

            And now you’re parroting the long ago-discredited canards, the rabid anti-White hatred, and the toxic Gentilephobia promoted by the notorious jewish ethnic activist, Noel Ignatiev? Comical.

            Here’s the origin of the “Irish weren’t considered White” blood libel:

            https://www.amazon.com/Irish-Became-White-Routledge-Classics/dp/0415963095?SubscriptionId=AKIAILSHYYTFIVPWUY6Q&tag=duckduckgo-d-20&linkCode=xm2&camp=2025&creative=165953&creativeASIN=0415963095

            Let’s take a look at some more of the jewish-supremacist, anti-White hate promoted by Ignatiev, shall we?

            “Abolish the White Race – By Any Means Necessary”
            “The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the White race.”
            “so long as the White race exists, all movements against racism are doomed to fail.”
            “Treason to Whiteness is loyalty to humanity.”

            “We’ll keep bashing the dead White males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as the White race is destroyed. Not deconstructed, but destroyed.”
            “The goal of abolishing the White race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed White supremacists.”

            -Noel Ignatiev

            http://harvardmagazine.com/2002/09/abolish-the-white-race.html

            Video of Ignatiev vomiting forth his hatred:

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOyBO-ts20c

            Let go of your hatred. Try to be more tolerant. You’ll feel better.

          • Sorry friend. Society has shunned you which is why you’re here with your buddies imagining your spectacularly failed fascist ideology is viable. Crying to me won’t change a thing.

            You can go on about cults and conspiracies, that’s what fascists do to justify their views of ethnic cleansing, genocides, and various crimes against humanity perpetrated against academics, journalists, and scientists with who fascism disagrees.

          • Your pathetic inability to make even the feeblest attempt to refute a single one of the many facts that I cited is again noted. Give up your anti-White hatred and Gentilephobia. Try to be more tolerant. You’ll find that it will help you to consider the facts, rather than merely mindlessly repeating your faith-based narrative.

          • I don’t have to refute you, just as I don’t have to refute an idea that 2+3=6.

          • “I don’t have to refute you”

            This, of course, is a simple declaration of faith, equivalent to “I won’t attempt to refute your argument, partly because I know that I can’t, but mostly because facts don’t matter. The real world doesn’t matter. Only the narrative does.”

            Loyalty to the progressive cult is all that matters to you, despite your pretense of worshiping SCIENCE!

            Let’s review the most basic points that I have demonstrated so far, that you have so pathetically failed to contest, shall we?

            1. Race is a real, biological category.

            2. The US was explicitly founded as a White nation.

            3. Your feeble, irrational attempts at deconstruction are directed entirely at the White race, never at Blacks, or jews, or “Hispanics” (a far less coherent category, by the way).

          • You belong to a cult that ignores all enlightenment ideals and worships ethnic and tribal conflict as a means to extract wealth from others and appropriate it to your tribe.

            You worship a fascist ideal that elevates the nation above rule of law and all moral codes in order to take from others and give to yourself in a barbaric worship of cruelty and evil.

          • Let’s review the most basic points that I have demonstrated so far, that you have so pathetically failed to contest, due to blind faith in a deeply irrational ideology, shall we?

            1. Race is a real, biological category.

            2. The US was explicitly founded as a White nation.

            3. Your feeble, irrational attempts at deconstruction are directed entirely at the White race, never at Blacks, or jews, or “Hispanics” (a far less coherent category, by the way).

            Your projection of your hatred and intolerance onto me is comical, given that you already confessed to your status as a committed disciple of “neoliberalism,” which promotes “anti-racism” (anti-White hatred) in large part because of their view of people, not as individuals, or belonging to any valid, organic groups, but as mere interchangeable cogs in the great machine of the global economy. Heck, even (((commies))) realize that:

            “See, capitalism is not fundamentally racist – it can exploit racism for its purposes, but racism isn’t built into it. Capitalism basically wants people to be interchangeable cogs, and differences among them, such as on the basis of race, usually are not functional. I mean, they may be functional for a period, like if you want a super-exploited workforce or something, but those situations are kind of anomalous. Over the long term you can expect capitalism to be anti-racist – just because it is anti-human. And race is in fact a human characteristic – there is no reason why it should be a negative characteristic, but it is a human characteristic. So therefore identifications based on race interfere with the basic ideal that people should be available just as consumers and producers, interchangeable cogs who will purchase all that junk that is produced – that’s their ultimate function, and any other properties they might have are kind of irrelevant, and usually a nuisance.”

            (((Noam Chomsky)))

          • You belong to a cult that ignores all enlightenment ideals

            Comedy gold right there!

            All enlightenment ideals? I think we adhere to most of them actually.

            worships ethnic and tribal conflict

            Well that would hardly make us different from most other ethnic groups then. Why are we supposed to act as if this sort of thing wasn’t already going on? Plus we would rather separate and avoid conflict, it’s you who promotes conflict. Eg immigration and ‘racism’. If you believe the only issue with immigration is the hateful bigotry of whites then why do you want to subject PoC to such horrors?

            as a means to extract wealth from others and appropriate it to your tribe

            And this wealth we’re trying to extract? You’re saying the current globalist arrangements are more equitable?

            And what wealth? Do you mean like oil? Oil that was worthless until white people’s science and engineering made it useful and it required the same to extract it. While Arabs and others who just happen to live in proximity to it – An Accident of Birth™ – get to cream off profit from that despite contributing zero to this form of wealth.

          • “All enlightenment ideals? I think we adhere to most of them actually.”

            You have no idea what enlightenment ideals mean. Your entire screed is practically a book burning of all the logic included in the the Federalist Papers, US Constitution, Locke’s Second Treatise of Government, and Rousseau’s Discourse on inequality.

          • Federalist Papers, US Constitution, Locke’s Second Treatise of Government, and Rousseau’s Discourse on inequality

            Lol! All the products of white folks! Or are we going to learn that certain Hidden Figures were actually responsible?

            How will these ideals be maintained by non-whites? What evidence do you have that other, non-white, groups adhere to or admire these ideals as much, or more so, than whites?

          • I hear that these ideals have been transferred quite successfully to Negros. Liberia has a Constitution that is quite similar to the US Constitution. I believe that accounts for their remarkable success in establishing a prosperous, safe, and stable country.

          • Good news then. I stand before you chastened and wiser and see that Written is in fact entirely correct in his position.

          • Clearly, you’re just a leftist LARPing as a Republicuck, making vague, feel-good allusions to documents about which you know nothing. Allow me to assist you:

            John Jay, Federalist No. 2 “a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in their manners and customs.”

            Preamble to the Constitution: “ourselves and our posterity”

          • Wow, that’s what you use to defend fascism? You are one brainwashed Nazi.

            Sorry fascist, this is where I leave you to scream impotently about the evil Jews and all the inferior people’s you don’t wish to have human rights because of John Jay.

          • Your emotionally-based refusal to acknowledge the obvious fact (demonstrated above, and contrary to your feelz-based “diversity” shilling) that the US was founded as a White nation, and your reflexive retreat into angry gibberish in response, does much to demonstrate the validity of my point. Thanks.

          • any Alien being a free white person, who shall have resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States for the term of two years, may be admitted to become a citizen thereof on application to any common law Court of record in any one of the States wherein he shall have resided for the term of one year at least, and making proof to the satisfaction of such Court that he is a person of good character

            “An act to establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization” (March 26, 1790). [Emphasis added]

          • Both of those things refer to White, Anglo-Saxon Protestants.
            The United States was founded as an ANGLO-SAXON ethnostate.
            As the venerable Vox Day himself has said, if you cannot trace Anglo-Saxon ancestry on both sides of your family, you are not an American. I don’t care how blue your eyes are. You have to go back.

          • Just accusatory posturing and deployment of straw men on his part.

            He would get 0 points for that in a debate.

            It’s akin to lobbing ad homs at an opponent.

          • I don’t have to refute you

            You do if you don’t want to look like a loser.

          • I think it’s hilarious that you guys think anyone cares who you think is a loser.

          • It’s not what I care about. I’m thinking of you here.

            Anyone reading this thread who hasn’t already made their mind will read what you’ve written and see a shrill and emotive commenter who can’t seem to back up any of the sweeping generalisations he’s making.

          • Anyone reading this thread has made their choice on what they believe. My recitation of a academically and intellectually accepted belief systems regarding science, history, economics, and political theory is unlikely to convince anyone that isn’t inclined to believe it.

            Accepted and respected society is a built on a huge repository of knowledge, that it is impossible for me to explain on disqus.

          • In a more ideal world science, history and economics would be judged more, er, scientifically. But you’re making it clear they are just ‘belief systems’. No way for any of us to argue on those terms really.

          • Those systems are judged as scientifically as possible. It is the alt-right’s (and historically fascism’s) desire to construe reality according to a nationalist belief system, not according to science, economics, or what is accepted but the most educated experts.

            The nation is what is accepted as the highest ideal in which all other ideals are to be subjugated.

          • Translation: “I will continue to insist on “debating” with my imaginary mental construct of muh ebil nazikkkfascist White supreemist, instead of actually engaging with the arguments with which I’m presented.” Are you familiar with the term “solipsism,” by any chance?

          • i don’t think he is. And like most leftists, he repeatedly commits the “Appeal to authority” fallacy (>>”what is accepted but the most educated experts.”<<), which is just downright boring. Hardly a political crisis occurs for which "the most educated experts" aren't responsible. See the Obama administration.

            It's very tiresome to read his responses in this thread. He sounds like a college junior.

          • Heh. You’re welcome to repost a single fact that you’ve adduced at any point in this thread; a single piece of actual evidence that you’ve linked to. Hint: your score is zero so far on empirical support. Just about 100% on parroting standard leftist slogans, though. Maybe 60% on deconstruction– you keep attempting it, but your technique is fairly poor compared to better-indoctrinated Cultural Marxists.

          • Brother, you sound like a parody of yourself. Just stahp. Please learn our arguments before you come and embarrass yourself like this.

          • Embarrass myself? You have a high opinion of what you’re capable of doing with your bad economic models, debunked science, and failed pseudo-fascist ideology.

          • Give us some examples of diversity working.

            Best if you try to avoid stuff enforced by law or the barrel of a gun.

          • The Early Unites States Republic was multicultural dynamo, the North eventually creating a diverse society whose economy & diverse ethnic population (seeking economic opportunity unavailable in slave states) defeated the confederacy which offered little outside of the White Nationalists who desired a stagnant society of White Supremacy and ethnic exclusion of immigrants.

          • Your mistake in confusing the advantages of a population almost 3 times as large and a much larger industrial base, with the disadvantages of of even a much smaller degree of diversity than the toxic version we have now, is comical. You also ignore the obvious disadvantages of the South’s rather more vibrant diversity. And you still (of course) have not made even the feeblest of attempts to back your race-denialist delusions with the slightest amount of empirical support.

            You’re essentially a flat-earther, who, when presented with irrefutable empirical evidence that the earth is in fact round, and that the heliocentric model is much more consistent with the evidence, merely repeats his cult’s dogma, interspersed with random accusations of “you just hate flatness!” “Oblate spheroid supremacist!”

          • “Your mistake in confusing the advantages of a population almost 3 times as large and a much larger industrial base…”

            Northern industrialism and mass immigration didn’t happen on accident. A century and a half later and Confederates are still clueless on why they lost the war.

          • So according to your “reasoning,” when the Soviet Union invaded and subjugated the Baltic States, that was evidence of the moral superiority of their system? Uh huh.

            Also, if you were capable of consistent reasoning, your argument would have the South winning the war, due to their much greater (and far more vibrant) “diversity.” None of this, of course, does anything to support your irrational, quasi-religious race denialist beliefs.

          • So you deny the history and economic development of the United States by analogizing it to Russia and the Baltic states?

            Wow, that argument is so impressive.

            I’m floored by the thought that went into that argument that one side winning a war is completely analogous to a different war. Amazing!

          • You are, of course, still unable to point out any ways in which diversity is a strength in any real sense. I suppose I should have know better than to expect you to be able to deal with analogies. You do realize that the point of an analogy rests upon the relationship between the two entities, not on their specific characteristics, don’t you?

          • I can’t educate if you refuse to acknowledge that multiculturalism is not racial. That have similar skin pigment does not make culture.

            Go in peace and hate Jews, Blacks, Muslims, Asians and everyone else. I’ve learned all I can for your view that there is no reality, merely a sick desire to elevate yourself to a supremacist role.

            Have a good one.

          • I hope that you’ve learned something, and that you will at least attempt to let go of your anger, your toxic anti-White hatred, and your virulent Gentilephobia. I also hope that you’ve learned from my analogy that Whig history is not in any way, shape, or form a moral or ethical argument.

          • So you cite facts that in no way justify White Supremacy?

            1) You agree they are facts. Good.

            2) Straw Man Alert! The only person to mention White Supremacy was you.

          • 1. Granny Smith apples are green is a fact, but it doesn’t prove White Supremacy.

            2. Not writing the words White Supremacy, does not exclude you from being White Supremacist. Since this site is clearly full of self-avowed White Supremacists, your straw-man charge is laughable

          • Very sad that your blind, unthinking hatred and fear compels you to project your jewish supemacism onto us. Try to be more tolerant. Let go of your hatred. For your own good.

          • Jewish Supremacism? I don’t support the final solution or crazy HItler-esque conspiracy theories.

          • Very sad that you are so unwilling to acknowledge the ways in which your jewish privilege compels you to spew forth this irrational hatred and anger towards those you view as your inferiors. Most unfortunate. I’m glad to hear that you deny any current genocidal intent, though.

    • Utter nonsense. If America is “about ideas”, why can’t it assimilate 70 IQ feral tribespeople from Africa or the ME? Why is that even desirable? They are unassimilable and ghettoize themselves. What’s the net gain? What could they possibly offer us that we don’t already have? You don’t need science to tell you that, it can be verified through simple observation. We built the house. We can damn well select who we allow inside. NO ONE has a right to come here.

      • Groups have assimilated into America for 200 years. Imagining you’re part of some race of Aryan supermen is just ignorant of all of American history.

        • Answer my question:

          What is the net gain for the US in importing people from cultures radically different from our own, the majority of whom use some kind of social welfare services long-term at taxpayer expense?

          I honestly can’t think of any.

          And “ignorant of all of American history” is flat out dishonest; immigration priorities changed radically with the Hart-Celler Act of 1965.

          Deductive reasoning shows clearly that certain groups self-isolate and form micro-societies. It’s natural behavior. Human beings are guided by tribal instincts and prefer to be around their own kind. During the first wave of mass immigration to the US, many (Christian) Europeans did everything possible to assimilate, including anglicizing their surnames. Those days are gone. Suggest you visit Dearborn, Michigan if you want to do some empirical on location research. Same goes for Cedar Riverside in Minneapolis.

          • “What is the net gain for the US in importing people from cultures radically different from our own, the majority of whom use some kind of social welfare services long-term at taxpayer expense?”

            The Unites States does not import people as they would cattle. People emigrate legally. The advantages are a larger labor pool which creates the ability economic growth which allows for deficit spending on all the social services your parents and grandparents depend on and the massive military spending that the alt-right demands.

            People have this idea that immigrants cost more than they contribute to society, but that’s not true, over the long run they contribute what is needed to keep America growing.
            http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx?RecordID=23550

            That’s the problem with national-socialism, it assumes that military and social spending are compatible with shrinking economics, leading to a need to exploit other people’s and lands.

    • Dude you need to lurk for a while before you try to post this baby-tier nonsense. We’ve refined our arguments on these topics to such a fine point that you couldn’t get past the opening statements in a debate with one of us. Seriously, if you want to take on the Alt Right, you need to address our arguments, not parrot this idiocy which has been rationally and empirically disproven every time it has been put to the test. America was great because of the great men who created its fundamental ideas – those men were white. Deal with it.

      • You people hang out here and pat each other on the back and demand your arguments are so well-thought out and impressive, like a bunch of Marxists ignoring reality.

  • To me money is a burden. It is something needed to make it through this game we are all forced to play, but I have no real love for it. If I were to write a book or make a movie I would not want to sell it to people. I would want to give it for free. If I were to create something that I was truly proud of I would want everyone in the world to be able to experience it, not just those who can afford it. But we forced to sell our labor because it is the only way we can make it in this system.

    Some people act as if capitalism is something intrinsically good and that we should maintain it at all cost. But I see nothing good about it, at best I only see it as a necessary evil while I hope for a day we can get rid of it for good. All these shameless merchants and greedy corporations disgust me to my core. I just want to take all of their money and burn it.

  • Hey. Noah Smith here. I just want to say, I honestly believe that continued immigration, if it’s *skilled* immigration, will be a huge boost to white Americans. You may think I’m crazy for thinking this, but it’s my honest belief. I think it’s worth noting that President Trump seems to agree with me, and has promised to shift the U.S. toward a skills-based immigration system:
    https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-11-17/canada-should-be-trump-s-model-for-immigration-reform

    I hope he carries through with this plan. I believe that if skilled immigration is restricted, white Americans will suffer, and I don’t want to see that happen.

    Cheers.

    • So we get beaners pushing us out of blue collar jobs AND chinks pushing us out of white collar jobs. Win/Win for the Chosenites amirite?

      • I don’t think anyone’s going to push you out of a job. But note that if people *do* get pushed out of jobs, there’s no reason Jews aren’t just as vulnerable to it.

        Anyway, I wouldn’t be scared of being pushed out of a job. We’ve had a ton of immigration since Reagan and the employment rate is higher than it was back then.

        • Wages have fallen across many sectors (landscaping for example) due to immigrants working for lower wages. You’re sorely mistaken. The average person is getting crushed these days compared to 1984. Manipulate whatever statistics you want. You’re clueless.

          • Yeah, wages have gone down. But they’ve gone down even more in Japan, which doesn’t take immigrants. So I feel like something else must be up. I’m sure low-skilled immigrants reduce wages in professions like landscaping a little bit, but after looking at a lot of research I think the real hits are probably coming from elsewhere.

            But also, people should realize that low-skilled immigration is drying up (especially from LatAm). More and more, we’re just getting high-skilled immigrants. Which I personally think is great.

          • Cite your source that we’re immigration from places like the Dominican Republic and other low skilled places is drying up. That’s not true. The quotas haven’t been adjusted and there are people clogging up the wait lists from all over the third world, especially the countries that are the main “feeder nations”.

      • Man, if there are any Jews who actually have it in for white people, I haven’t met them.

        I mean, in this country practically all Jews think they *are* white. Plus, nowadays most Jews marry non-Jews: http://www.jta.org/2013/10/01/news-opinion/united-states/pew-survey-u-s-jewish-intermarriage-rate-rises-to-58-percent

        I mean, believe what you want, but this is what I’ve seen my whole life. And *I* certainly don’t have it in for white people, or Christians, or Western Civilization.

        • Jews are “white” when they attack whites. Otherwise their identity is Jewish. This is so common that it’s a meme.
          Jews want Israel to remain a Jewish state so they don’t lobby for Israel to take refugees and third world immigration but every Jewish organization pushes for massive third world immigration to white countries. The inconsistency is glaring.

          • I don’t know, there are definitely Jews out there who are against immigration. Like David Frum.

            As for me, I’m an American first and foremost. I guess that’s an unpopular identity these days, but I still believe in it.

          • I’m sure that you’ll be able to name some jewish organizations that support reasonable, patriotic immigration policies, then– for Europe and the US, that is. They all support restrictive immigration policies for Israel, of course. Doesn’t have to be ADL, AIPAC, or WJC-tier, or even have representation at the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations. Just a legitimate. openly-jewish organization that supports a rational immigration policy for one of the host countries. Go ahead. We’ll wait.

        • Very sad that you are in such denial of your obvious anti-White hatred and rabid Gentilephobia. Check your jewish privilege.

          • But if you check that story, you’ll see that the vast majority of Jews who outmarry don’t raise their kids Jewish.

            Is this the Second Holocaust? I don’t think so.

          • Here is the relevant part of the story. Did you check it?

            *** Emotional attachment to Israel has held steady over the last decade, with 69 percent of respondents saying they feel attached or very attached to Israel. Forty-three percent of respondents said they had been to Israel.***

          • Aside: (only because you mentioned the typhus and starvation deaths) You’re an economics guy and that means you know arithmetic. Auschwitz’s death toll was changed twice. (It began at 4 and is now at 1 million .) So what I don’t understand is how 6 – 3 = 6. Help?

        • Nice sleight of hand. The gist of that link is that Jews are losing their connection to the practice of Judaism. They are still identifying with the ethnic concept of being Jewish. They still support Israel as a Jewish state. They still vote heavily Democratic and Democrats want to flood the country with a never ending tidal wave of nonwhite invaders. Jewish organizations, many of them comprised mainly of secular Jews, are championing massive nonwhite immigration to the US.

        • Hey Noah, why do you leave this part of the story out?

          *** Emotional attachment to Israel has held steady over the last decade, with 69 percent of respondents saying they feel attached or very attached to Israel. Forty-three percent of respondents said they had been to Israel.***

          Like I said, nice try. Whether or not Jews are practicing their religion is meaningless. Secular Jews have been more involved with efforts to change the demographics of the US than religious Jews.

          • The funny part is, I didn’t even know that when I made that comment. I assumed it was some random Republicuck troll. Didn’t even realize he was the author of the linked article, or that he was a MOT. I didn’t read the linked article, of course– all of that muh melting pot/ proposition nation/ America is an economy not a nation BS starts to sound the same after a while. Haven’t seen a new thought in that marketing campaign in years.

        • I’ve met Jews who don’t consider themselves white and despise Christianity. Granted, they were immigrants from the Soviet Union so it’s probably a specific, cultural thing.

          • “I’ve met Jews who don’t consider themselves white and despise Christianity. Granted, they were immigrants from the Soviet Union so it’s probably a specific, cultural thing.”

            Or they’re just more open about it than most:
            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3XYMRAoqVmY

            The phrase “my fellow White people” is an interesting red flag in this context. It’s typically used as a segue into a rant about “White privilege” or “racism” or how White people are just evil generally. But if you look at who tends to use it in this way, a certain ethnic group is markedly overrepresented. One example:

            http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ali-michael/i-sometimes-dont-want-to-be-white-either_b_7595852.html

            The author babbles on about the evils of “Whiteness” and how it needs to be deconstructed etc. Don’t have babies, my fellow White people!

            “If I was going to pass on my privilege, I wanted to pass it on to someone who doesn’t have racial privilege; so I planned to adopt. I disliked my Whiteness, but I disliked the Whiteness of other White people more. I felt like the way to really end racism was to feel guilty for it, and to make other White people feel guilty for it too. And then, like Dolezal, I wanted to take on Africanness.”

            Yet despite this stated antipathy toward White reproduction, and supposed dislike of what she claims are her own people, the author has

            “two biological children (higher than the birth rate of the average couple of virtually every Euro-majority nation) with a fellow Jew, Michael Ramberg. If Ali’s forked tongue wasn’t infuriating enough, her husband is very much in tune with their truly racist and genocidal culture. He is the head Rabbi and director of the ethnocentric Zionist Hillel organization on the campus of Ursinus College.”

            http://www.tradyouth.org/2015/07/jewish-baby-boom/

            It almost seems as if she doesn’t really “identify” as White, after all. Which puts an entirely different face on the anti-White hatred that her article promotes. She doesn’t seem to feel any need to talk about “Jewish privilege” or “Jewish supremacism,” or to deconstruct Jewish identity, does she?

            When you see someone advocating White self-hatred, especially using that particular phrase (“my fellow White people”), just take a moment to check if they’re a member of the Tribe. Remember, Jews are only 2% of the US population. The results might be… interesting.

    • Why can’t we just educate the Americans we have? If we stopped telling kids to follow their dreams, or to just go to college because reasons, and instead guided them towards skilled trades and STEM we wouldn’t need to import foreign workers.

      • We can and should do both! Research shows that smart people complement each other – get two together, and they produce more than 2 times as much as if you had just one smart person. There’s synergy. That’s why when we bring in skilled workers, skilled native-born people see their wages go up! Work with a foreign engineer and you’ll see what I mean…

        But yeah, education is super important.

        • Speaking as someone from a family of immigrants, the foreign tech workers won’t mingle with American’s outside of work, or even that much at work. So much for that. Besides, cheap labor (and be honest, that’s what you’re asking for) stifles innovation. There’s the aforementioned lack of initiative in educating native workers and less incentive to invest in new technology. In the end you have to ask yourself this: is a couple dollars increase in the value of stocks worth the alienation and lack of social cohesion that results from importing massive amounts of immigrant workers?

    • This (((guy))) has a different tune to play in other stories on which he comments. If you’re white and don’t cheer declining white numbers in everything from entertainment to demographics, he calls you a “Nazi”.

    • White Europeans and their descendants invented the entire fabric of modern civilization and somehow we need non-White immigrants? You have to be joking.

      Whites would be terraforming the solar system were it not for having to drag the rest of the world along.

    • Oh yes, those Somalis and Syrians are flipping highly skilled… We should be demanding more. They are the doctors and scientists of our future. ROTFLMFAO.

    • H1(b) visas depress American wages and take American jobs. They also result in “brain drains” in countries with desperate shortages of skilled persons. The only people who benefit from the “skilled immigration” you describe are large businesses who get to hire workers at lower wages.

  • The Alt-right is true deep ecology applied to politics. It must be above preservation of both blood and soil

  • Most recent immigrants view our country as nothing more a mall. They don’t care about freedom of speech, natural beauty or high culture, and they just want shiny things with which to play.

    • just wait until 20-30 years down the line when they are the majority – watch them vote to have the govt take your money and property and give to them

      zimbabwe and south africa are coming to you

  • Keep in mind, the war against “fossil fuels” has nothing to do with saving anything.

    The fact is – it’s a war against coal miners, against oil field workers, and so forth. The fossil fuel, extraction industries are the very backbone of middle class America. That’s the reason they’re targeted by Jewish Attorneys General, Hedge Funders, etc.

    The most effective way to wage war against “Christians”, and all whites are “Christian” to the Jew, is to attack the sources of their wealth and, in the US, that wealth is heavily concentrated in the extraction industries, natural resources, etc.

  • I agree with nearly all of this article except mining in Appalachia. Appalachia is a desolate area comprised of dirt poor whites with little if anything in terms of gainful employment opportunities. I don’t necessarily want to harm nature but at the same time coal mining has provided good paying blue collar jobs to (white) Americans who severely lack comparable pay types of employment

    • The war against “fossil fuel” is a war against white people. Fossil fuels, extraction industries are the very backbone of a large portion of the middle class. Which is precisely why the Jew targets them so voraciously with the fraud of “man made global warming” and so forth.

      • Yeah I question why Spencer and crew are so concerned about preserving nature etc. Is it virtue signaling they are different from cuckservatives?

        Fact is the fossil fuel/extraction industry employs a lot of blue collar (white) folks in jobs that companies are unable to outsource to the 3rd world at a pay grade that allows many (white) people to get married, have kids, buy a home, car, and overall live a respectable life.

        • Indeed.

          As a practical matter, the fossil fuels and extraction industries are the white middle class.

          Anyone who’s preaching a white future, without fossil fuels and the extraction industries is completely delusional, IMO.

      • also the overpopulation message was directed at whites while african and brown and mooslim populations exploded

        all this environmental stuff was just a lie

        • The overpopulation myth brought to us by Stanford professor (((Paul Ehrlich))) – his ‘work’ The Population Bomb sparked the anti-natalist movement.

          While the Feminist Kool-Aid was brought to us by Betty (née Goldstein) also Jewish.

          Friedan went on to found NARAL, one of the most influential forces in the fight to legalize the murder of unborn children in America along with Bernard Nathanson. In fact the four original organisers of NARAL were all Jewish.

    • I feel like that’s a little harsh, man. I just want America to be strong and rich. Which means white Americans flourish. I don’t see how that’s genocide.

      • Come to my newly crime ridden neighborhood, courtesy of diversity. See how a 67 year old white grandmother I know, who was recently robbed by a Latino punk (she’s OK, just a bruise on her hip when she fell), is “flourishing”.

        You speak in glowing terms about whites race mixing and you don’t see how that’s genocide.

        I’d rather be less “rich” and be among my people, instead of living in a diverse amalgam of nonwhites. (And your economic premises are bunk any way.)

        • I’m sorry to hear about that old lady. That sucks.

          Yeah, I definitely do not see how interracial marriage is genocide. Makes no sense to me. If intermarriage is genocide, then we’re in the middle of the Second Holocaust, because Jews have an outmarriage rate of 58 percent.

          And yeah, I realize some people have the desire to live in a homogeneous community. But half the kids born in the U.S. last year were non-white. I feel like that ship sailed back when I was a kid.

          Anyway, I know we’ll continue to disagree about all this stuff, but I just want you to know I have zero ill will or malice toward white people, individually or as a group.

          • Jews have an outmarriage rate of 58 percent.

            And what is that rate on 1st marriages and marriages which produce children?

          • Jewishness is matrilineal, as you well know. Jews have always been a mutt-race (nothing inherently wrong with that). As long as a Jewish woman still considers herself a Jew, it doesn’t matter who she married or how many generations hence her offspring decide to pick up the Jewish identity.

      • Which means white Americans flourish.

        Except for the fact that the currently existing political bloc which they will effectively be forced into after arriving here is anti-white and views harm done to whites through any and all means as an absolute moral good. It will be hard for white Americans to flourish in a political climate wherein those who run the institutions hold as a standard that white people are a resource to be consumed for the pleasure of non-whites.

        You assume that the status quo will continue with just more brown people but the reality is that people who think like you will have zero political power in the near future and you will be replaced by a spectrum of political thought which is wholly different from any brand of leftism which Americans are familiar. You and yours have essentially imported and inculcated brown Nazis as a political bloc, and the whole non-white world reports on US politics with this perception. The “White Left” are viewed as discrete and separate from the political aspirations of non-whites, which is the reality.

        We are actively in the process of de-assimilating non-whites. The more non-white the country becomes the more open hatred of white people becomes the hallmark of what it means to be an American. Unfortunately for your aspirations of a strong America whites are becoming de-assimilated from America as well, which is the natural outcome of importing tens of millions of genocidal lunatics into the country.

      • Noah, do you ever worry that if the power-dynamics in America change you will be held responsible for your crimes? Do you really think advocating the ethnic displacement of a group of people will not come back to haunt you? Many, many people – normal Americans – will read what you wrote and come to one conclusion: in a just world, you will hang for your crime.

  • “Without immigration, mostly of Hispanics and Asians, economic growth will falter.”

    That’s just propaganda. Of course, when you add people, even poorly educated people, your economy grows, because those people buy food and the occasional new pair of shoes, etc. But adding more low productivity workers does not improve a nation’s standard of living, i.e., income per capita. Look at it this way: Cleveland has been losing population, yet Cleveland is still 27th in per capita income among American cities. Phoenix and Las Vegas have been growing (thanks in large part to illegal immigration) but they are 250th and 271st, respectively, in per capita income.

    https://www.citylab.com/politics/2017/05/the-wrong-way-to-grow-a-city/526653/

    A nation does not need to grow in terms of population in order to maintain a high quality of life for its citizens. The Japanese leadership understands this very well, which is why they allow almost no immigration.

    • Japan does not allow immigration because that will disrupt the harmony of their country and culture. America has been corrupted by jews who have propagated we need immigrants (but not from Europe!) in order to grow our economy. We could also grow our economy through increasing productivity.

      • We can definitely grow through increasing productivity, and that’s great. We’re always looking for ways to boost productivity. But it’s really hard. Productivity has slowed down in the last decade, and no one really knows why.

        • It has slowed because we have mass immigration which means cheap labor. If wages rise that makes it more attractive to automate. If you want more productivity gains you must stop all the low IQ 3rd world immigration.

        • “Productivity has slowed down in the last decade, and no one really knows why.”

          Whatever the reason, clearly it has nothing to do with the effects of importing millions of people with average IQs in the 80s (if we’re lucky– Somalians are much lower, of course) as cheap labor. It’s not as if cheap, but not very competent, labor leads to business decisions favoring labor-intensive, low-productivity but less capital- and technology-intensive methods, or anything. And certainly it has nothing to do with the inevitable decline in social trust and social capital brought on by the wonders of diversity, or with the negative externalities associated with said wondrously vibrant diversity.

          Because, as everyone knows, Diversity is our Greatest Strength™. It’s a puzzler, I tell you.

          • As the CEO of GM stated before the government takeover. “it is a race to the bottom”.

        • It is because of the offshoring of our manufacturing sector. The illegal free trade agreement. The importing of foreign goods without Tariffs. We do not need any further population growth. The ones that immigrate here now are low class low IQ persons with no education, no medical history, no skill. They are pulling us down.

    • I support Japan’s decision to restrict immigration, since I think their culture is less able to assimilate newcomers than ours is. Still, it’s worth pointing out that Japanese wages have been falling for decades, poverty rates have risen, and even Japanese companies aren’t investing in Japan because of the shrinking market.

      I’m trying to think of ways to help raise Japan’s fertility rate (which would presumably work for the U.S. too), but so far the only thing that seems to slightly work is France’s universal child care.

      • You should go to Japan and tell them to replace themselves with third world blacks and browns. Apparently the Japanese don’t know what you know. You could turn ignorant Japan into a powerhouse. .

        • They couldn’t handle large amounts of immigration, I think. But we’ve handled it a bunch of times before.

          • When did we import massive numbers of nonwhite immigrants before? We never have. Please go to Numbers USA’s Roy Beck. He has youtube videos which will knock your socks off.

            And by the way, why can’t Japan do it? Why are Asians different than whites? You believe that people are interchangeable economic units any way.

          • i dont want to force them onto Japan either

            the people who built these countries need to stand up and throw out the (((parasites))) behind these policies

          • we dont want it.

            dont want low IQ, high violence, high crime monkeys imported into our countries.

            why dont you flood them into that racist supremacist state known as israel

        • I don’t know much about Israel, or really care. They can do whatever they want, I guess. Everyone always uses Israel, but for me, my double standard is really with respect to Japan.

          • Yet when you write an “article” promoting the destruction of a nation, it’s the historic American nation whose end you choose to advocate for so energetically. You’re welcome to link to an article published in any major legacy media outlet by you, or any of your co-ethnics, that advocates a similar policy for Israel. Odd, that.

          • That fact that you couldn’t give a straight answer to that question tells us everything we need to know about you.

      • i read something a few weeks ago about the Asian Tiger economies were smashed maybe 10-20 years ago and the (((IMF))) or some jew banking system was imposed on them.

        • Well the Japanese have always been more closed to outsiders, and Shinto is literally a race-based religion unlike anything Anglos have practiced since at least pre-Christian times. But probably the biggest reason is the language. Learning Japanese is much harder than learning English.

          • America was practically closed to non europeans prior to 1965. Literally everyone was “racist” back then as we were not corrupted by PC culture.

            Why should we have to bear this burden?

      • The print currency and inflate out of recession is what has destroyed everything, the central banks are the regulators of economic growth.

  • There is a need to talk about how Fascism is able to make the society rich through “national socialist” redistribution of usury. This sounds base but is the swan song to masses. Show the people a way they can throw off their chains besides communism and the sound of cuffs falling to the floor will ring clear. The poor must feel as if this will make them rich.

  • Once again Ahab strikes, hammering his thoughts into another powerful piece of prose. I agree
    a 100% when he states that “the ideological basis for it (Neoliberalism) must
    be utterly discredited and destroyed”; and would respectfully add that the Alt-Right
    and other white nationalist and identitarian groups spend too much time advocating
    for the white race and too little on explaining the basis for their own ideological
    beliefs. The word ideology represents an inner human spirit, one that must forge
    its own ideas and concepts into a vision of governance. Before any discussion
    can be had about nation or race or Semitism, we must recognize that the primordial,
    eternal and Manichean struggle lies within us. Long ago, the seed was split and
    ever since that time the White Man has been divided. At no time in history have
    the contours of that fight been so clear. At no time in history do so many
    white people find themselves at the coal face of that fight. Democracy has seen
    to that. When the Alt-Right speaks of no more wars of brothers; I say the opposite.
    This is a fight between two different characters of men. The one noble and
    honest to the point of self-destruction; the other cunning and cowardly to the
    point of destroying everything that is worth preserving in the human race. The
    man who fights in this war must be prepared to defeat and if necessary kill his
    brother. Until that time we should not fall into the traps that have been laid
    for us by an enemy that is more cunning than he is brave. Our arguments do not
    lend themselves to a world of promise and deception. Our arguments are based on
    the often hard realities of life as well as the circumstances within which we
    as species find ourselves. Our time will come when we find the courage and the
    skill to explain what it is we mean when we speak of the hard realities and the
    often cruel circumstances of our existence.

    • The time has come to find that courage. We all know the truth here at the Alt Right. The White people, no matter their political beliefs will all be killed, enslaved, etc. I’ve been challenging non-AR Whites lately on that issue, “when the Whites are but a fraction of society, do you really think you will be viewed as a ‘good’ White person?” … The fear on their face at that exact moment is obvious, because they know – they will be viewed as a White person, and they’ll face a horrific fate, no matter how hard they cuck. Sadly, none of these people I have reached out to have admitted it in words, but you can definitely see the concern. So, maybe they will act, but I can’t say with any confidence that they will ever do the right thing and become AR.

        • It’s the definition of a genocide, and if it isn’t yet, it will be shortly. Yet, I don’t see anyone in the US or Europe saying, “we need to save the White South Africans as refugees!” I guess White people don’t get refugee status, huh? Yet again, more proof that anti-white sentiment is not only real, but it’s powerful. We must stand against it.

          • You’d have an easier time getting a living permit in western Europe now as a sub-Saharan African than as a Ukrainian. Fact.

  • 1. “Without immigration, mostly of Hispanics and Asians, economic growth will falter.”

    2. “Neoliberalism is nothing but capitalism elevated to the highest ideal of human life. It is the ideal of money and wealth placed over all culture, spirituality, honor and justice.”

    To me, #1 is really about lowering the average wage. #2 is an observation that leads me to believe Jew$ are involved and behind most everything that is anti-White. Then, because of #1, working class whites will have to subsidize the very livelihoods of those people. Whites are literally being forced to pay for their own cultural extinction. It’s absolutely ruthless, a word that is synonymous with Jew$.

  • Hispanics, like Spaniards or Mestizos, people speaking Spannish language? Hispanic means Hispania, Roman name for todays Spain. “Latino” comes from Latin on which is based Spannish language.

    In short, Hispanic and Latino are wrong terms for non-white people.

    • >In short, Hispanic and Latino are wrong terms for non-white people.

      Objectively false. When the bulk of Hispanic and Latino refers to race-mixed non-Whites that outnumber biological Spaniards 5:1 then being Hispanic means being non-White. And that takes us to Christianity as an identity. Most Christians are non-White. That number is increasing every day while the number of White Christians is decreasing. The moment you allow for race-mixing is the moment Whites lose as a group.

      • “Most Christians are non-white”

        thats prob why the catholic church is pro the illegal immigrant invasion

      • Objectively false.

        Objectively? Don’t embarass yourself.

        When the bulk of Hispanic and Latino refers to race-mixed (non-White) that outnumber biological Spaniards 5:1 then being Hispanic means being non-White

        Just because some English speaking moron in USA started to call Mestizos as “Hispanic” or “Latino”, it does not make it correct.

        Latino comes from Latin origin of Spannish language and Hispanic from Hispania, Roman name for todays Spain.

        Indians from India outnumber biological English by millions but you don’t call them “Anglos” or “Germanics”(“Germano” in this analogy).

        And that takes us to Christianity as an identity. Most Christians are non-White. That number is increasing every day while the number of White Christians is decreasing. The moment you allow for race-mixing is the moment Whites lose as a group

        Christianity is religion, not race and ethnicity.

    • In the US white spanish-speaking people just call themselves “Spanish” (even if their ancestors aren’t from Spain). In the US “Hispanic” and “Latino” are euphemisms for mestizos, as well as non-white Lusophone Brazilians, and even pure-blooded Indios who don’t even speak Spanish. As far as I’m aware neither of these terms are used in any Spanish speaking country to apply to any people group.

      If you want to take that fight where it matters you’ll want to track down chicanos and their Jewish allies who popularized them, not us. We actually mostly just use “mestizo” in our own circles to avoid confusion.

      • In the US “Hispanic” and “Latino” are euphemisms for mestizos

        Yes, and it is incorrect.

        You don’t call Indians with dots, “Anglos” or “Germanics” because they speak English (family of German languages, like Spannish comes from “Latin”-o) language.

      • “If my enemy likes making money, then I’ll become destitute to spite them!”

        • Capitalism is the true way, all the examples of Western countries outsourcing all their industry and importing cheap brown slaves to increase profits are abberations. We need TRUE capitalism!1

          • 100% Agreed…..

            You guys are the Thought Leaders…….

            I’m just saying that at this point…….

            …..we should be more (((shrewd)))………

            ……and work within this System set against us……..

            ……..until Conditions improve or are destabilized to the point……

            ………where we can Capitalize (no pun intended)……..

          • Yes and I am doing exactly that but I am not going to sit idly by while swarms of non white 3rd worlders are pumped into our country.

          • The myth about Scandinavian socialism is that it is actually just capitalism with a bigger welfare state.

            In fact capitalism is probably the wrong term. Since whether “capitalist” or “socialists” they are all based on the same debt and profit scheme. Perhaps the more correct term to encompass all of these would be “Monetarism” or a money-based system.

    • 1) The alt right is so far right that puts of our philosophy is yes, left. I believe the political spectrum is circular. 2) no one is saying get rid of capitalism but the ABUSES of capitalism ie: illegal labor and mass immigration bidding down wages and diluting our white majority.

      • I would say it is spherical. The 3 axis are totalitarian, anarchy, and liberalism (or some variation of that).

    • We should troll this guys youtube channel and try to convince all his viewers the issue lies with the jews

  • So, some in the Alt-Right want to Destroy America……

    Good luck with those Political Optics to Normie America…….

    Ha!!

  • Good article.

    The current economy will eventually collapse, and when it does, if things continue as they have been, all of our culture, environment and community will be long gone. Some things are just more important than capital and living individualistic, hedonist lifestyles. When the Soviet Union collapsed they still had their community and were able to re-build. When our economy collapses we’re looking at Mad Max style dystopia. Good times ahead.

    • Indeed. Orthodox Christianity was in a “deep freeze” during the Soviet era and re-emerged with a vengeance after the collapse of the SU. Now, Orthodox nationalism is a significant cohesive force in Russia. We have no equivalent in the USA except, perhaps, for civic nationalist patriotism which is moderately strong in certain sectors but which wouldn’t be enough to unify the country and prevent the MadMax style dystopia you mention. Amazing, that hard core communist repression wasn’t enough to destroy Russian faith, but in the US, cultural Marxist infiltration of our institutions has plunged us into degeneracy and cold civil war.

      • Russia was never as Multi-Racially Diverse as America is……

        Multi-Ethnic……

        Uzbeks……Jews…….Muslims…….

        But, nothing like the Chaos of America……

      • Orthodox Christianity had the added benefit of existing in White countries that were still White. That’s the only reason it’s still around. If the Soviet Union mass imported Negroes and Mestizos/Amerind then the Orthodox Church would die. White Americans cannot go to church in America or Western Europe without being cucked by clergy.

        Race is the issue.

        • Eastern Orthodox Christianity is not nearly as morally corrupt and bankrupt as its western counterpart. It still has all the flaws of Christianity, which I do not believe to be a divine religion but a nakedly transparent control system.

      • As a Greek Orthodox I should add a bit more on the effects of orthodoxy: Orthodox peoples have all their culture emanate from Orthodoxy. In effect this means that if one changes his religion or dogma he ceases to also be his nation. I have noticed this in Greece were everyone that turns to atheism ceases at that moment to care about anything Greek. Although not by first-hand, I take the idea that the same is true for all Orthodox peoples. This characteristic is the reason why even such harsh repression wasn’t enough to break it. On top of that the heathen, skype and heretic-o-meters or Orthodox peoples tend to be actually quite sensitive for this reason massive deviations in theology do not happen and in the end in Greece it was easier to start turning us into atheists (we are speaking for an at least 50 year endeavour) rather than to corrupt the Church. Now the reason why this came to be had to do with the history of Orthodox peoples: All were once conquered for centuries by non-Christians non-whites. This made religion to go in hand with some form of racism and with the national feel. In fact this is so strong that it nearly becomes inseparable. Now I must admit that the only Church that managed to have been influenced is the Greek but even that appears ultra-right (and you can find nationalistic clerics) in front of the other Churches today, in the end the greatest influence was to give it a socialist spin…

        • Yes, it was the same with Codreanu during the Romanian nationalist movement in the 1920’s and 1930’s – Orthodoxy was at the center of national identity. It’s a beautiful thing, really, the idea of God and nation as one. It is definitely the quality lacking in current Catholicism and Protestantism, which have fallen victim to socialism and universalism. I have visited Greece many times and seen the monuments to the nationalist martyrs, many of whom were Orthodox clergy. Arkadi Monastery on the island of Crete is something like the Alamo in San Antonio, TX, in terms of independence.

    • Ahab links to an article by (((Noah Smith))) who you see is just an “American” who wants what’s best for you, goy.
      Here he is. He’s white when he’s telling you that being white doesn’t matter. He thinks whites race mixing with blacks, mestizos, and Asians is positive for whites and that whites living in more diverse areas is good for whites too. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/466843b969ea8e2c13ef54bdc767d56f011506205f9418e65c0a07fb3280f0e5.jpg

    • What is the extent that you believe in free markets? Regulation? Government control? Gold standard?

        • Doesn’t that run into the same problems as Totalitarian Communism in which no one is responsible for investment and development because there is not incentive to create infrastructure?

          • Depends where it is being implemented and who is overseeing things.

          • Your faith-based conviction that design is everything, and material nothing, is comically ignorant.

          • Sweden had socialism of a kind for decades but remained a pretty nice place to live. Zimbabwe has also pursued a form of socialism for some time. But, for reasons which remain entirely obscure, has failed to make it a nice place to live.

          • “Zimbabwe has also pursued a form of socialism for some time. But, for reasons which remain entirely obscure”

            That’s not true. Historical structures in Zimbabwe (and most of Africa) from imperialism left a governmental structure that encouraged exploitation rather growth or self-governance.

          • Exactly. That’s why Hong Kong, which suffered under the horrors of evil oppressive Whitey until quite recently, is still such a hellhole today. And why Haiti, which was lucky enough to throw off the chains of the nasty colonialists more than 200 years ago, massacring all of the Whites (and most of the mulattoes) in the process, is such a shining example of prosperity, “human rights,” and political stability to this very day. Excellent point.

          • Hong King is a colony that was the recipient of modern liberalized trade and representative practice in government long before it was turned over to China, which now oversees the colony.

            Haiti suffered from a lack of resources and denial of trade from nations fearing similar slave reactions. True their situation is problematic, but it is part of a social phenomenon of what academics would call a vicious circle.

            You can go back to yelling incoherent like a racist Nazi now.

          • Your admission that your argument was completely baseless is duly noted. YOu do know that Haiti was the “jewel of the Caribbean” under White rule, don’t you? And what great stores of natural resources (other than human, that is) does Hong Kong possess? Pathetic.

          • The slave plantation society is the fascist ideal of perfection huh? I’ll leave others to grasp that ideal.

          • Your pathetic inability to refute my basic point– that if colonialism were the problem, then Haiti would be in far better shape than Hong Kong– is duly noted.

          • I love that historical argument is dismissed as faith-based. I love that you’re upvoted for such a hilarious dismissal of actual logic.

          • You’re welcome to present any actual evidence in support of your race-denialism at any point now. Since you appear to have significant problems with short-term memory, here’s a reminder:

            On the scientific validity of race:

            Humans can be genetically categorized into five racial groups, corresponding to traditional races.
            https://web.stanford.edu/group/rosenberglab/papers/popstruct.pdf

            “Human genetic variation is geographically structured” and corresponds with race.
            http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15508000
            https://archive.fo/EyHDj

            Race can be determined via genetics with certainty for >99.8% of individuals.
            http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15625622

            Oral bacteria can be used to determine race.
            http://medicalxpress.com/news/2013-10-oral-bacteria-fingerprint-mouth.html

            Race can be determined via brain scans (i.e. brain structure differs at the macro level between races):
            http://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822(15)00671-5

            There was “minimal gene flow” between archaic Europeans and Asians.
            http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/20/science/20adapt.html

            Common-sense racial categories have biological meaning.
            http://www.ln.edu.hk/philoso/staff/sesardic/Race2.pdf

            Or, if actual scientific papers are too dense for you, you could just try asking any oncologist if race matters for a patient who needs a bone marrow transplant.

          • If you refuse to believe conclusions from universities, scientists, doctors, and medical researchers; there is little I can do to convince you your information is incorrect.

          • Your pathetic inability to defend your points with actual evidence, and your feeble attempts to use appeals to authority, (((deconstruction))), sloganeering, and distraction in its place are comical.

          • This is where I leave you to yell at society for refusing to believe in your inherent superiority.

            You were born with light skin so you think that allows you to hate and demean others, to deny the cultural heritage of freedom and liberty in exchange for fascist violence and hatred.

            Go in Peace, only you won’t. You’ll go in anger and hatred.

  • This is a Great Article……..

    But, this is not a Practical Policy Description for Modern America…….

    This is an Ideal Political Paradigm for our Future White Ethno State…..

    We’re not even close to being there yet…….

    We’re in a War right now……

  • Well, Ahab…….

    In this Multi-Racial/Multi-Cultural Hellhole we call America…….

    White Men are competing with Non-White Men……….not only for the Attention of White Women…….

    ……and Access to Reproduction to stave off Miscegenation and Build White Families……

    But, also merely to Survive and Exist amidst the Open Border Onslaught of Hard Working High Birth Rate Foreigners……

    I don’t know how you earn a Living……

    But, most of us have to actually perform Real Work…….

    And most of us appreciate Capitalism because an Idealistic White Ethnostate is just a DREAM now…..

    Mountaintops will recover due to Non-Stop Geologic Change……

    Forests will recover……..especially due to the increased Atmospheric CO2 Fertilization Effect…….

    Whites won’t if we don’t have the Capitalistic Resources to stave off White Genocide……..

      • Ha!!

        Because I live in Reality…….

        Because I live amidst the Multi-Cultural/Multi-Racial/Multi-Ethnic Chaos…….

        …….of America…….

        They are here…….

        They are not going anywhere……

        They are Mass Reproducing…….

        They are Productive and Hard Working……..

        The Resources provided by Capitalism are Bountiful for Whites to do the same……

        If we can get our Act together……

  • “Neoliberalism is nothing but capitalism elevated to the highest ideal of human life. It is the ideal of money and wealth placed over all culture, spirituality, honor and justice. It is the enshrining of calculating greed as the highest of all human motives. It is Mammonism triumphant. It is a disgusting and ignoble creed, yet it is the dominant philosophy of all major world leaders and institutions in the West. If we are to demolish the arguments of Neoliberal economists calling for greater nonwhite immigration, we must drag this vile system of anti-values down from its position of smug self-glorification and force it to look itself in the mirror.”

    What a call to purpose. This is an excellent summation of what we are fighting and what we are called to do.

    • In an Ideal White Ethnostate……

      Yes……

      But, in the Multi-Cultural/Multi-Racial/Multi-Ethnic Hellhole called America……

      Capitalism is a Useful Tool…….

      If Whites are willing to Work Hard enough and Compete with Foreigners………….

      The Resources are Bountiful to Build a Better Future for our People……

      …..or at least Sustain our Gene Pool……..

      • >>If Whites are willing to Work Hard enough and Compete with Foreigners…<<

        The "competition" you speak of has become an artificially created free-for-all on the job market resulting in an endless downward spiral in wages for the benefit of the neo-liberal elites. It's utterly self-defeating to assume that this can be rectified through "hard work" on the part of whites. It can only be solved through immigration restrictionism and a political movement that opposes the neo-liberal sell-out of all our manpower and resources to the highest bidder. If you want to protect European civilization, you have to protect our people and the market w/in which they're able to thrive.

        • If you want to compete with Bangladeshi workers who make 12 cents an hour, you can work for 11 cents an hour. The idea that your mystical “work ethic” is going to overcome a global labor market filled with slave labor amounts to magical thinking.

          • So, in America…….

            How are we going to elect an Alt-Right Candidate??

            Can you describe how we attain 64 Million Votes and 270 Electoral College Votes??

          • We have to install our candidates at lower levels to address the issues and move the Overton window to the right.

            We have to ensure that the vote is trued and impose much tougher penalties for violations of immigrations laws.

            Building the damn Wall would be a start.

            I see that it’s in Trump’s next budget. If he doesn’t build it, voters will leave him in droves.

          • That’s Realistic…..

            Thanks…..

            That is the Path Forward……

          • Realistic? Have you forgotten the impact of automation? This always happens in these threads. The values: culture, spirituality, honor and justice is what is left when there is no meaningless work left. Your view is short term not long. I would also add the concept of America is done and over. Time to start new.

          • Culture, Spirituality, Honor, and Justice???

            “No meaningless work left”…..

            “the concept of America is done and over”…….

            NIHILISM……

          • More like realism. If the cheap latinos aren’t going to kill us, the robots will. It is like the Twilight Zone episode “The State” where once you are no longer needed or job is displaced you are termed obsolete and face having to choose the method of your own execution.

          • Get the laws changed to adopt low threshold proportional representation in local jurisdictions with a large percentage of white working class populations. Nearly all nationalist parties in Europe of any influence were able to gradually grow in size using proportional representation by moving more and more of the sheep in their direction. People generally despise politicians but (on the other hand) are also impressed by officeholders and show them deference in spite of themselves.

          • of course the sold out republicucks are behind not funding the wall

            its a uniparty of sellouts and traitors on the left and right

          • Yep. Btw.: Ryan and Mccain are meeting this w/e with Uber-Cuck Romney in Utah. Bet they’re planning nefarious sh – it as usual.

          • The “damn Wall” is all very well, but it will also serve to lock in the 60 million migrants who came to the US as a result of the (((Hart-Celler))) immigration bill of 1965.

            The bill is even named after the Jewish Congressman that dedicated his career to fighting for it. He vowed to do so in 1924 as the last piece of legislation prioritising immigration from Western Europe into America was passed.

            Hart-Celler needs to be repealed and immigration reversed.

          • Bruh………….

            You……………..

            Need……………

            To…………………

            Stop…………….

            With……………..

            Whatever……….

            This………………..

            Is……………………

          • We don’t attain a majority vote, ever. We’ve been invaded and they hold too many votes; end of story. We need to stop thinking in terms of any project that requires a majority, and instead think in terms of recruiting one million hard, determined men to do what must be done.

          • Americans actually do pretty well in international competition, because we go high-tech. One American worker using machines can produce many times what a Bangladeshi worker can using only his hands. The real reason we often have trouble competing against countries like China is that their governments subsidize their industries. They give them cheap coal, cheap capital, and they keep labor as cheap as they can by crushing unions and assassinating labor lawyers. They don’t make good profit margins, but it’s really hard for our companies to beat theirs in international markets. That’s what Trump was referring to when he talked about how we “never win anymore”.

          • It means when you dump a lot of cheap labor on the market with no capital to go with it, wages go down and profits go up. Which we saw with China in the 00s.

        • That’s not going to happen though……..

          At least not in America…….

          The Wall might be Built to Restrict Illegals…….

          But, Foreign Labor will still be required to perform all the Jobs that many Whites and other Americans (Blacks) don’t want to do…….

          Ann Coulter is not going to get elected President…….

          Neither is any Alt-Right Candidate……

          I wish they were……

          But, it’s not Realistic…….

          • “But, Foreign Labor will still be required to perform all the Jobs that many Whites and other Americans (Blacks) don’t want to do…….”

            It’s literally the same argument that was used to justify slavery.

          • I’m trying to be Realistic…….

            You’re being Idealistic……

            Who is going to do all the Work in America that the Illegals are doing right now??

            Which American Demographic??

            Blacks??

            Ha!!

          • Some could be done by young people. I have two teens that would love to work part time but can’t get a job ANYWHERE.. No one will hire them 28th current liability laws and the flood of adults invaders.

          • So, I should have voted for (((Bernie Sanders)))???

            Ha!!

            Uh……NOPE……

            NEVER……

          • The thing is, we already have far more than enough cheap foreign labor to perform the jobs “Whites don’t want to do.”

            Why import more?

            In SoCal, for example, you can drive by locations where dozens of illegals are lined up & waiting for work as day laborers. I’d say the demand has been more than fulfilled. In fact, there’s a huge surplus that represents a drain on the welfare system and often presents a hazard for our citizens.

          • “I’d say the demand has been more than fulfilled. In fact, there’s a huge surplus that represents a drain on the welfare system and often presents a hazard for our citizens.”

            I agree……

    • ‘What a call to purpose’……….’what we are called to do’…….

      OK……

      So what’s the Political Path for our Future to attain what we’re Fighting for??

    • I totally hear you about materialism not being the end-all of society. There’s a lot more to life than material welfare! But I don’t want to see American grandmas and grandpas have to scrimp and save and turn off the heat in the winter because the economy’s shrinking and companies don’t want to invest here. That’s what happens in countries with shrinking populations – the companies stop investing and wages fall. It ain’t a pretty sight.

      • You should go to Japan and tell them to replace themselves with third world blacks and browns. Apparently the Japanese don’t know what you know. You could turn ignorant Japan into a powerhouse.

        • Such an intellectually engaging retort. You alt-right guys have really made sharpened your arguments.

          Your economic arguments explaining how to shrink the labor pool while continuing to grow the economy and living standards, are mind-blowing.

          • It’s not a retort. It’s a pithy summary of the “intellectual” content of Smith’s “argument.”

          • His economic argument was that shrinking labor pools constricted economic growth and living standards.

            Your retort was mindless ad hominem mocking insults.

          • So of course, he promotes measure to increase the birth rate among members of the historic American nation. Since he’s claiming that the birth rate is too low. Whoops! I forgot. That’s his policy for Israel. The goyim should be treated differently, of course.

Leave a Reply