Perspective

Georgetown University Professor Personifies the JQ

When I first saw the story on Buzzfeed about Richard Spencer being verbally accosted by a hostile SJW in an Alexandria gym, and subsequently having his gym membership terminated, I was disgusted but not exactly surprised.  Then, when I read more about the details of the incident, I was somewhat taken aback by the sheer level of brazen rudeness and unfairness on display.  But a deeper investigation of the individual involved uncovered some connections which truly shook me up, but which nevertheless serve as a perfect encapsulation of the entire JQ in a single case study.

At first, I merely thought:  poor Richard, he must have unluckily happened across a particularly obnoxious representative of the SJW phenomenon.  All the trademarks were there:  the initiating of attacks while simultaneously posturing as a defender of victims, the feminist double-standard of physically confronting a man while simultaneously calling him cowardly for not using violence against women, claiming the right to political space and free speech while denying that right to others, bullying in the name of anti-bullying, extreme rudeness and self-righteousness, arrogance and bourgeois entitlement.  The defining highlight came with the SJW’s own Tumblr post bragging about the incident, a crowning example of virtue signaling written in that signature leftist blend of pretentious, professorial rhetoric and crude sexual obscenity.  And naturally in this instance corporate America, as it always does, deprived the white male of rights while caving in completely to the screeching demands of politically correct unreason.

As the day went on, my sense of injustice grew as I watched the mainstream media pick up the story with relish:  headline after headline proclaiming how “white nationalist” Richard Spencer was “banned from gym after confrontation,” “banned after woman confronts him for being a Neo-Nazi,” “kicked out of gym after being identified as a white nationalist,” and so on.  No mention of the fact that Spencer was the victim, no credit given to him for his calm and measured response or the enormous restraint he displayed under the circumstances, not one word about the injustice done to an innocent man kicked out of an establishment for simply being verbally assaulted while minding his own business, when he did not even respond in kind.  This was worse than punishing the innocent with the guilty:  this was rewarding the guilty while punishing the innocent.  And the implication was crystal clear:  if you’re even accused of being a white nationalist, you can be banned from any corporate space in America.  And since 21st-century America is almost entirely owned by large corporations, with little to no public space remaining either in the streets or on the web, this amounts to a regime of leftist-capitalist control as oppressive as the former Stasi tyranny over East Germany.

It was only later in the day I read that the particular SJW involved, Georgetown University Professor C. Christine Fair, was Jewish.  This did not take long for anyone to deduce, as she self-identified as such using the Alt Right-invented “echo” symbol on Twitter.  Then her obnoxious behavior made more sense to me, especially employing the Tim Wise-like trick of claiming to attack Spencer “as a fellow white person.”  I remembered Voltaire’s quote about the Jewish people, that they were “cringing in misfortune, and insolent in prosperity.”  Christine Fair, as is so often the case, managed to be both cringing and insolent at the same time.  Her legalistic appeal to “corporate,” without regard to justice or fairness, was typical of the Hebraic mindset.  And of course, her unlovely visage was like a cartoon out of a Third Reich children’s book.

Later that evening, I began to read more about her, and that it was only then the full hideousness of her character truly came into view.  C. Christine Fair, according to her own website, is a highly credentialed academic with Georgetown University’s Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service, formerly a senior political scientist with the RAND Corporation, a political officer with the United Nations Assistance Mission to Afghanistan in Kabul, and a Senior Fellow at West Point’s Combating Terrorism Center.  She is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, has testified many times before Congress on matters of terrorism and foreign policy, and is “a frequent commentator on television and radio including the CBS, BBC, Al Jazeera, CNN, Voice of America, Fox, Reuters, NPR… she has given extensive interviews to journalists with the New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, Time Magazine, The Atlantic Monthly, Businessweek, The Los Angeles Times, The Boston Globe and other print media outlets.”

It seems Dr. Fair is not simply an SJW, not even an especially vile SJW who merely “happens to be Jewish,” but is, in fact, a major intellectual advocate of Zionist imperialism and war crimes, from the deepest bowels of the Washington establishment.  Her special area of academic expertise is the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, that deeply conservative authoritarian nationalist state in South Asia which, incidentally, still refuses to recognize the State of Israel.  And it also seems Dr. Fair’s entire career has been dedicated, not merely to “studying” Pakistan, but to doing everything possible to undermine the security of the Pakistani nation, right up to the point of justifying drone strikes against civilians.

The State of Pakistan itself is an interesting study in political incorrectness.  This country of 200 million is severely out of step with the prevailing liberal-capitalist global world order, not only for its extreme nationalism but also for its socially conservative religious culture.  The ruling military class of Pakistan descended from the warrior race which once built the Mughal Empire, have incorporated Islam into their nationalist worldview in a way that would be familiar to many in the Alt-Right, but totally alien to any advocate of secular humanist individualism.  Pakistan is also strategically firmly in the Russian-Iran axis, which does nothing further to endear it to the champions of globalist neoliberalism.  A list of Christine Fair’s most recent articles in Foreign Affairs magazine includes “The Pakistani Military’s New Coup Playbook:  Democracy Is Still on a Leash in Islamabad,” and “Pakistan’s Middle-Class Extremists:  Why Development Aid Won’t Solve Radicalism.”  A quick search for her name on YouTube reveals countless examples of her single-minded quest to undermine the position of the Pakistani military and weaken the country’s position internationally.  Reading between the lines, it’s easy to spot all the characteristic methods of Jewish subversion which have suffused the American foreign policy establishment since the days when Walter Lippmann and Edward Bernays ran the Committee on Public Information during the First World War:  making the world safe for “democracy,” fighting “extremism,” and “militarism” in the name of “peace.”

This combination of extreme social liberalism at home, combined with murderous interventionism abroad, only makes sense if one understands the biological nature of the Jewish problem.  For a Jew such as Christine Fair, these are not moral positions taken from the point of view of abstract ethical principles, but particularist tribal interests wrapped up in universalist platitudes as a defense mechanism.  Anywhere in the world, traditionalism, martial values, strong gender roles, nationalism, authority, hierarchy and religious faith are qualities which strengthen group ties and fortify communities against threats from outside and infiltration from within.  George Soros’ “open society” is nothing but a way to soften up strong, healthy societies for domination by Jewish finance capital.  It is here that the seemingly contradictory impulses of “compassionate” Social Justice Warriorism and ruthless Neoconservative warmongering come together in perfect harmony.  The rule is:  that which makes it easier for the Jews to dominate a society, is good.  That which makes it harder for Jews to dominate is bad.  One day it might be protesting microaggressions, the next it might be remotely blowing up Pakistani children from the air.

As always, the seemingly extreme double standard of this attitude, which is astonishing and incomprehensible to the natural instincts of settled, creative peoples, is perfectly defined by the Yiddish word chutzpah, famously defined by Leo Rosten as “gall, brazen nerve, effrontery, incredible ‘guts’, presumption plus arrogance such as no other word and no other language can do justice to…. that quality enshrined in a man who, having killed his mother and father, throws himself on the mercy of the court because he is an orphan.”  This uniquely Jewish trait was a key survival mechanism adopted as the weak and tiny Jewish tribe moved as wandering merchants and nomads throughout the ancient world and is stamped indelibly on the race.  Dr. Christine Fair, then, was only acting within the oldest traditions and the biological evolution of her type when she brazenly attacked the Anglo-Saxon Richard Spencer in a city built by Anglo-Saxons merely for quietly and unobtrusively keeping to himself – the same way she, as a foreign interloper, audaciously challenges the right of the Pakistani army to defend its own interests.

There is no doubt this woman would justify drone strikes against white children in Europe or America just as easily.  There is no moral compass here in the traditional sense, only the most narrow tribal interests operating on a crude reptilian level, merely dressed up in the trappings of academia and intellectualism.  For such a specimen, the ancient language of the Anglo-Saxon race, or our great institutions of higher learning in the West, are but methods of camouflage to be superficially mimicked in order to advance the singular agenda of Jewish domination and control.  The same goes for “hate speech” laws, Tumblr blogs, and drones firing missiles into remote villages.  There is no more opportunity for rational debate and intellectual argument with such a creature than there would be in trying to convince any mindless parasitoid that it shouldn’t kill its host.

But it is important to remember:  this is who is shaping the foreign policy of the United States.  If Richard Spencer could randomly bump into such a vile individual by going to an Alexandria gym, how many more similar characters are swirling around the Washington D.C. swamp, stalking the halls of power and whispering in the ears of Senators?  How many of the brave men and women of our race who serve in the armed forces, from places like Kentucky or West Virginia – or the military elite who form our young officer corps at West Point – know that the missions on which they serve, and for which they are expected to give their lives, are being set and determined by the scheming Christine Fairs of the world?

Knowing what she thinks about Trump supporters, what she thinks of white masculinity, her complete intolerance of political dissidence and her total disregard for human life – it is only natural to assume that if the traditional people of Appalachia, or any other region of heartland America, were to say enough with the removal of statues, the forced demographic replacement, the banning of symbols of heritage and free speech, the legal harassment and abuse of politically incorrect opinions – and woke themselves to the point of declaring some form of political independence from this liberal-capitalist globalist tyranny, that Christine Fair would be advocating drone strikes against American small towns and hamlets.  The same strong white men who built the civilization this parasite now inhabits, who erected the mighty neoclassical state architecture of the city in which she dwells, who have given their lives to secure this land and territory on which she treads, would have their families blown to bits by drones if this vile woman had her way.

This is why it is so critical to study this case, to understand the nature of the enemy we’re up against.  This is not simply a matter of denying a man the right to mind his own business and not be accosted in public for his political opinions.  This is a life or death struggle for survival against a racial enemy which has no conception of fairness, justice, or the value of human life.  It starts with the denial of the basic right to use a gym, and it ends with death by technological terror from the skies.

Comment

63 comments

  1. ThomasER916 26 May, 2017 at 08:08 Reply

    Here’s a video I stumbled upon where a black women defends Richard Spencer. In the comments she says that it was Obama election that brought her in
    direct contact with Liberalism and by his 2nd term she was against it. She seems to have a clear understanding of virtue signaling, SJWs, and Whites pathologically speaking on behalf of blacks. At one point she says, “He’s not causing problems with us”, which is observably true but they have to be willing to see it.

    • Jack Burton 27 May, 2017 at 10:27 Reply

      Within the spectrum of white racialism and white nationalism, Richard Spencer is actually extremely moderate and one could even say a bit to the left politically. He doesn’t advocate racial purity. In fact, he advocates for limited race-mixing. Spencer is actually closer to the Alt Light if you look at his actual political and racial standards. He’s closer to a Western chauvinist like Gavin McInnes than actual racial preservationism like what NS Germany and traditional white America advocated.

      Spencer says we should just absorb millions of mulattoes and that race-mixing with Negroes is “not a threat” currently. He said 10% miscegenation is fine, and is only a threat if it’s 50%, LOL! That’s some seriously retarded nonsense for a “white supremacist” to say. So no, Spencer is actually a lightweight when it comes to real white supremacism.

      If Jewish harpies, and I count mischlings and spiritual Jews in there as well who act like Christine Fair and Joy Behar (Italian, which is significantly West Asian), think Spencer is dangerous their heads are going to explode when they encounter real racialists.

  2. Smash Islamophobia 25 May, 2017 at 19:52 Reply

    Fair has a video on youtube whining/ gloating about her histrionics. The vast majority of the comments are negative, but the few supportive ones seem to be mostly pajeets. This struck me as odd at first– what, she hired some Indians for a few shekels to shill her youtube comments? Then I realized; they support her because she loves to drone Pakis, and they don’t care (or know) about much else. This is a broader lesson when it comes to the Tribe, of course. The enemy of your enemy is not necessarily your friend.

  3. Truth.Is.Marching 25 May, 2017 at 01:57 Reply

    We need to be taking direct action in this matter. Here is what can be done:

    1. Get her gym membership cancelled, along with her co-conspirator. Taking pictures is against gym rules, so they should have to forfeit their gym membership. In the meantime, someone local needs to get a gym membership, and either take in Richard as a guest (if that is allowed) or confront ms. Fair – taking videos and posting them on youtube. Try to get in her face and incite violence. Make it about killing bombing children.

    2. Attack her at work. Search through her work for plagarism. That is one of the only ways to get someone fired from academia. Get a former student, and see if she used the ideas or research of a former student without properly documenting it. She is on sabbatical, so protesting at her office or classroom is not going to work.

    3. Protest in front of her house. Need to be careful so the law isn’t broken, but there are some small scale protest steps that can take place. It is more dangerous from a legal perspective and neighborhood ordinances can trip you up.

    4. She likes to appear in public, and on TV. Engage her in a public location, prior to a public event.

    It is clear she likes to engage. Best to have someone else with a camera there for the police record. Better to find fraud in her academic record, and far more damaging, than to get in a shouting match.

  4. Oscar Madison 24 May, 2017 at 21:25 Reply

    Excellent article, thank you!
    The ritual abuse these edomites receive as children really cripples these ppl and in turn they lashout at everything not of Thier tribal ways.
    Very dangerous to themselves historically and at this late date to the rest of us deadly.
    Im hoping spencer was doing this gym on purpose to instigate an episode to be exploited by the right side.

  5. Gabriel Martindale 24 May, 2017 at 06:15 Reply

    Christine Fair is not Jewish. Clue’s right there in the name. She uses the echoes as some gay solidarity thing, which is quite common.
    http://metro.co.uk/2016/06/05/people-are-putting-echoes-around-their-names-on-twitter-heres-why-5925002/
    Regardless of the merits of her views on Pakistan, they have nothing to do with Israel, or Judaism. If the personification of the JQ is a non-J, who has nothing particular to do with Js, then it might indicate that you are obsessed.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4069936/Georgetown-prof-C-Christine-Fair-went-meltdown-Muslim-ex-colleague-Asra-Q-Nomani-admitted-voting-Donald-Trump.html
    Christine Fair is a legitimately unbalanced woman. Her husband, if she has one should calm her down. She, being a woman, has an excuse for being a hysteric, what’s yours?

    • curri 25 May, 2017 at 00:31 Reply

      It’s like the Gunther Grass novel (Crabwalk) where a young man becomes obsessed (due to family connections to one of the tragedies) with the pre-war murder of Nazi Wilhelm Gustloff and the sinking of the refugee-filled ship named after him near the end of the war. The young man eventually kills a Jewish-presenting friend for showing contempt for the memory of the two events. The murderer says it doesn’t matter whether his victim was Jewish or not-he nevertheless represented The Eternal Jew.

      Not endorsing violence-just drawing parallels.

  6. Mike549 24 May, 2017 at 05:07 Reply

    Wow. This article is a devastating critique of this vile individual and everything it represents. There is no reasoning with them and there never was.

    • Jack Burton 27 May, 2017 at 10:35 Reply

      What’s funny about this is it’s so typically Jewish. I see some morons arguing she’s not Jewish. Regardless of her actual ancestral makeup, she is a Jewish exemplar. I’ve watched some of her videos, and to Indians and other non-Europeans she’s very modest, very forgiving and says she has to right to tell them what to believe and they should decide for themselves. Oh, but for whites, she’s a maniacal harpy who gets in a white man’s face, gets him banned, and tells him he has no right to exist. She is a perfect example of Jewish hypocrisy and anti-Euro hatred.

  7. Andrew 24 May, 2017 at 00:33 Reply

    Bravo, Ahab. That was an excellent piece. You masterfully weaved in all the themes of modern American politics together in extracting the morals (or lack thereof) from that disappointing episode. Great and cogent analysis of Fair’s motive and means. Your bold yet sadly accurate predictions need to be heeded by all of us, and serve as motivation for awakening the masses to the Swamp Globalists who want to see us subdued.

    • katebushfan66 25 May, 2017 at 15:39 Reply

      her weight of the world on her shoulders routine has aged her .. she is lost in the global village of absurdity, lost to the white race … or perhaps triggered and in for a rough ride.. she went over and deliberately messed with dicky.. dicky has friends..

  8. jsigur 23 May, 2017 at 21:44 Reply

    Finally, an article addressing the Jewish question. I was beginning to think it was a banned topic. They are the true enemy, you know. (talking about the apparatus of Jewry not your Jew next door coming over for your rent money as he refuses to fix the leak in the roof)

  9. Catiline_Conspirator 23 May, 2017 at 18:33 Reply

    Why did my anti-Dugin comment (different thread) get deleted while Krafty Wurker is allowed to comment at will?

    • Yehudah Finkelstein 23 May, 2017 at 19:47 Reply

      Probably weird Disqus algorithms. Perhaps Krafty Wurker’s Catholick rants will throw off the Disqus Algorithms soon.

  10. Riopel 23 May, 2017 at 17:38 Reply

    We’ve forgotten an ancient truth that our ancestors knew all to well: the jews are an evil people.

    it isn’t more complicated than that. They are consciously evil and enjoy being evil. There is nothing to understand about them.

  11. Charles The Hammer 23 May, 2017 at 15:08 Reply

    Christine Fair is not actually Jewish. She claims she almost converted though. Just because someone has echoes around their name doesn’t mean they’re actually Jewish. She’s just a crazy, childless, cat lady. Easy to see how people would jump to conclusions since she behaves in a very Semitic way. Her world view is definitely Jewish.

    • Martin Eden 23 May, 2017 at 16:43 Reply

      She is an active saboteur of American traditions, with the podium to influence others, Semitic through and through. And this is an excellent treaty on the Semite character and how it, as an effluence of the internal conflicts of Judaism, finds expression in a society to erode and replace it.

    • Krafty Wurker 23 May, 2017 at 17:42 Reply

      It’s very possible that Fair may not be a Jewess. But, Georgetown University her employer is very much a Roman Catholic school. Remember the film, “The Exorcist”? You don’t get much more creepy and Roman Catholic than that film.

      Didn’t Fair “exorcise” Spencer from the gym he belonged too. Do I see a trend here.

      • Yehudah Finkelstein 23 May, 2017 at 20:00 Reply

        The Exorcist was only made because the Catholick Joe Kennedy set up dual Jew-Catholick control of Hollywood.

    • Bruce Regael 23 May, 2017 at 19:15 Reply

      If it thinks like a Jew, acts like a Jew, and talks like a Jew then you might as well be one. It’s like Zionism. Not all Jews are Zionists and not all Zionists are Jews, but from what we’ve seen some of the worst Zionists are actually gentiles. They choose to be the shabbiest goy in town overcompensating for something they’re inherently lacking, which I’m guessing is identity like most of the liberal lunatics.

    • unpaidpundit 23 May, 2017 at 20:39 Reply

      It would be odd for a Jewish family to name a child “Christine,” since that name means “follower of Christ.”

    • Alt Right Gossip on Youtube 24 May, 2017 at 08:31 Reply

      yeah, she basically admitted she is not jewish in a tweet from just a day or two ago…it’s hilarious how all these supposedly dedicated white nationalists etc all get sidetracked by this JQ….most jews love that white nationalists believe that jews are in control of the world…it boosts their ego….and the mega-corporations that really are in control of most of the developed world like that white populism is distracted by the JQ and away from the real issues of mass immigration and anti-white multiculturalism.

      • Hipster Racist 24 May, 2017 at 09:34 Reply

        I somewhat agree with you … but I can understand people harping on the Jewish Problem because it’s simply not allowed to be discussed anywhere else. In America (and seemingly in Europe) Jews form the intellectual and financial core of the anti-white movement. If American Jews all left for Israel tomorrow, the anti-white movement would still exist but it would quickly fade into irrelevance.

        Whites could organize a populist coalition against the mega-corporations – but that populist coalition is being fought against by Jews. Abe Foxman plotzed in his kishka over the sight of an audience of white people raising their right hand to vote for someone as mainstream as Trump. Even Bernie Sanders, an 80 year old Communist Jew, was slapped down for making some noises against mass immigration, by his fellow lefty Jews.

        One problem is that people can wrap their heads around why multi-national corporations push for open borders and mass immigration of scab labor. But the average white person has no idea why Jews would be so anti-white – not just “against racism” but actually, literally, murderously anti-white.

        It’s a fine line we have to walk and online there are so many Jews posing as “Anti-Semite Nazis” it makes it even more difficult.

      • El Geherg 24 May, 2017 at 18:35 Reply

        It isn’t really an either-or question. I will grant that some are overly obsessed with jews but given that jews are deeply entrenched in the mega-corporations and their jewishness is not incidental to that, the proper approach seems to be aware of both rather than choosing one or the other.

      • Rascal 24 May, 2017 at 21:45 Reply

        From a political standpoint she might as well be Jewish. She aligns with all of the traditionally Jewish narratives, strategies and goals. Even she understands this, hence the parenthesis.

        The JQ is simply short hand for explaining someones political inspirations, and social practices just like ‘cuck’, and ‘thot’ are.

    • Jack Burton 27 May, 2017 at 10:39 Reply

      Why are you arguing against her Jewishness? Politically she is a Jewish exemplar so it doesn’t really matter what her ancestry is. Phenotypically it’s obvious she has West Asian ancestry.

      What exactly is a Jew? A Jew is a Euro-West Asian hybrid genetically who is tribal, has a hypocritical ingroup vs outgroup morality, and hates Western whites. She fits the profile exactly.

  12. Fred 23 May, 2017 at 13:19 Reply

    What does not seem to balance in my mind and presents a clear dilemma is the current Jewish attitude to the ongoing destruction of Western societies. Disclaimer, it does not necessarily apply to Eastern or Mizrahi Jews, but Ashkenazi ones. Nowadays, outside of Israel, Jews survive and thrive almost exclusively in Western Christian societies. Why, then, they do not comprehend the very obvious consequences of the destruction of the West: Jews will most likely suffer from that occurrence.

    The world domination after the West is gone? Garbage, because China, India, the Moslem world, Black Africa remain and will not extend the same courtesy and understanding as Western societies. One would think that Ashkenazi Jewish activists should spend their time defending the West by all means possible. Frankly, I am not seeing it.

    • Charles The Hammer 23 May, 2017 at 14:54 Reply

      Either Jews are delusional enough to think that they will rule over the lands that once made up the West, or they hate European people so much that they are willing to destroy themselves in order to destroy us. I’m not sure which is the case. Jews do think quite highly of themselves. Their level of collective narcissism is almost beyond comprehension.

    • Ike35 23 May, 2017 at 16:58 Reply

      They hate us more than they love themselves. When that’s your mentality, you’re liable to do all sorts of stupid things that don’t make much sense.

    • Hipster Racist 23 May, 2017 at 17:26 Reply

      Jews attack their competitors in the White elites and want to destroy their potential future competitors from the lower classes. They believe they will be the new elite ruling over a mixed proletariat.

      Remember Charlie Manon’s “Helter Skelter” idea? That was direct from Trotsky. The “New Left” Jews into the 1960s were going to “lead” the Blacks to rise up and kill most of the Whites then the Jews would rule over the Blacks because they weren’t going to be capable of ruling themselves. Blacks were to be the proxy force taking orders from the Jews. Then the Jews would rule over the new mixed proletarians. This is literally Trotsky’s idea of uniting the third world against European colonialists.

      • Fred 23 May, 2017 at 17:37 Reply

        That is precisely my first point: for whatever reasons, the Jewish view of the world and the relationships with the West got stuck in the 20th century. They still view the relationships with the West in terms of pogroms, Holocaust, class struggle, shtetls, the Pale of Settlement, etc. However, the example of decaying France has demonstrated that Jews leave the land first, even before it becomes a no-go zone for a White man.

        Hello, it is 2017 now!

        • Clark Kent 23 May, 2017 at 19:32 Reply

          Their whole religion is basically just tribal elitism.
          You think they’re stuck in the 20th century, but they’re really still stuck in ancient Egypt and Rome!
          They’ve been a wandering group of merchants for all of history, but now is their chance!

        • Hipster Racist 24 May, 2017 at 09:46 Reply

          @disqus_8by6UZGbQx:disqus
          That is because if they were to move past “pogroms, Holocaust, class struggle, shtetls, the Pale of Settlement” – they wouldn’t be Jews anymore.

          Judaism as a religion is barely above Haitian voodoo – they even still wave chickens around their heads as a sacrifice to the devil. Judaism has produced none of the sublime art and sculpture that Christianity has, it has none of the philosophical complexities that Christian theology developed. It’s nothing more than a grab bag of superstitious fairy tales and ancient practices from the Bronze age.

          Judaism never modernized – modern Jews are not religious, it’s all about those secular concepts: pogroms, Holocaust, class struggle, shtetls, the Pale of Settlement.

          As MacDonald and TOO writers has repeatedly pointed out, the non-crazy Jews tend to outmarry and just join regular “white” society, thus are no longer Jews. Which means that the Jewish community expels its moderates and retains their radicals – it’s how the collective survives.

          “Pogroms, Holocaust, class struggle, shtetls, the Pale of Settlement” are a substitute secular Judaism, one that is based on nothing more than a false history of constant persecution by “the goyim.”

          Considering that in America someone who is ethnically Ashkenazi is free to drop both the religion of Judaism and the secular replacement of “Holocaust” etc. the only reason for them to refuse to join whites as equals in the community is hate.

          Literally, for a modern Ashkenazi American to retain religious or secular Judaism is an expression of hatred for their neighbors. No one has to be a “Jew” – it is a choice, a choice made out of hatred.

    • Riopel 23 May, 2017 at 17:42 Reply

      How will jews suffer from the destruction of the West? They’re a desert people and they’re happy in Israel, which they only keep for themselves.

      Central to jewish psychology is a deep, bloody hatred of beauty, as it reminds them of their own ugliness. Of course we Whites are their most hated adversaries for this reason. There’s nothing a jew enjoys more than seeing Europeans raped and slaughtered by his fellow semites, blacks, and mongrels.

      Look at Dresden, that oh-so jewy attack on the world’s most beautiful city. That could only have been conjured up a jew, to firebomb a city of palaces and civilians.

      The goal of every White Nationalist should be jewish genocide. They literally must all be killed if we are to survive.

      • Fred 23 May, 2017 at 18:04 Reply

        The creation, survival, and expansion of Israel would have not been possible without the West and the Eastern Block. So is its future without the White World.

      • mybabydidn'tdonuffin 23 May, 2017 at 23:16 Reply

        I’ll never understand for the life of me why Hitler let up during the battle of Britian.

        • Yehudah Finkelstein 23 May, 2017 at 23:48 Reply

          Hitler didn’t let up. He stupidly bombed the cities after initially targeting airfields and factory production.

        • Andrew 24 May, 2017 at 00:43 Reply

          Dunkirk was the most pivotal moment in modern Western history. Hitler’s idealism and mercy was used against him Jewish influenced war hawk Churchill

          • Fred 24 May, 2017 at 15:54

            Will not comment on the modern Western history, but Stalingrad, then followed by Kursk, was the most pivotal moment in the World War II. Stalingrad and Kursk determined Hitler’s Germany faith regardless of Churchill, Normandy or any other action on the Western Front. The whole Western Front was about of not letting Stalin reach the English Channel.

            I will accept the important role of the Western military aid to the Soviet Union, but whether English evacuated Dunkirk or would have buried alive had no significant bearing on the outcome of the World War II.

      • Yehudah Finkelstein 23 May, 2017 at 19:49 Reply

        Not really. Gottfried was speaking of an emerging Paleocon/Libertarian “Alternative Right” to the patriotard Bush years of Freedom Fries and Flag lapel pins. Gottfried had nothing to do with the White Nationalist Alt Right which Spencer coalesced with the first AlternativeRight.com site.

        • mybabydidn'tdonuffin 23 May, 2017 at 23:13 Reply

          ha ha ha, I remember that that “Freedom Fries” crap. I used to be a hardcore repub in those day’s. I actually stood in line for hours to see old G.W. in 2004. Then twelve years latter someone gave me “My Awakening” by David Duke. No, there is no turning back.

          • Yehudah Finkelstein 23 May, 2017 at 23:30

            I was a leftist when I was young because of the Iraq War. I hated George W. Bush. Then I watched Pat Buchanan on TV, read his books, and started to get red pilled. Tom Tancredo was also good speaking out against the illegal aliens from Mexico back then.

          • FrancisParkerYockey.com 24 May, 2017 at 01:07

            Years ago there was a super strong super aggressive “alt right” type movement in the Christian community. I was part of that. This movement made Spencer and Duke look like schoolgirls. Back then trolling was way better. People would freak out and lose there minds if they thought you were “racist”. Unfortunately they were way ahead of their time.

    • Robert Cardwell 24 May, 2017 at 18:54 Reply

      The destruction of Europe and its diaspora does actually make sense if one wishes for a Greater Israel occupying the land between the Nile and the Euphrates rivers. Such an expansion of Israel is going to take a lot of manpower, both military and settlers. The existing Jewish diaspora are mostly not interested in moving to Israel, so they need a fire lit under them to get them to move, and I think that’s the reason for the emphasis on an Islamization of the west.