Perspective

The Saker and Other “Dissident” Bloggers Are Completely Out Of Touch

Like many Russia-watchers, I enjoy reading the Saker’s blog.

He has gotten really big, especially after he started to be featured on Unz – a community of dissidents and HBD enthusiasts.

But I find myself increasingly frustrated by his inane babblings about the true nature of Islam and the future of Europe. The man is a brilliant analyst with excellent contacts, no one is disputing that. But like a typical member of his age cohort, he seems to have no problems with a future in which Europe and all White countries becomes non-European. Naturally, he lives in Iceland, (or did) the Whitest island in the whole wide world. And before that in Switzerland, the Whitest country left in Europe.

Remember this meme?

Just apply it to the whole damn country of Iceland AND Switzerland.

He wrote a post recently that sums up his analysis of the situation unfolding in Europe. He blames the terror attacks on a Zionist/Security services false flag using radical “Takfiri” muslims as useful idiots. He starts out talking about the future of Europe as he sees it:

Does that mean that the EU will become ISIS-occupied territory where all women will end up wearing burkas and/or raped, all men forced to converted to Islam or murdered, that slave markets will spring up all over the country, that Sharia law will be imposed on everybody, and that homosexuals will be stoned to death?

Of course not! This is a silly caricature of Islam created and promoted by the AngloZionist 1%ers who run the Empire and who are trying to artificially create a clash of civilization which would allow them to remain in power and to continue pulling the strings from behind the scenes.

For one thing, Muslims will remain a rather small minority in Europe for the foreseeable future. But even more importantly, the kind of “Hollywood ISIS-Islam” which I portrayed in the paragraph above is not at all the kind of Islam most Muslims want to live in. In fact, many of them fled their own country precisely to avoid living in a Takfiri “Caliphate”.

You might ask me about those Wahabi crazies who have already murdered many Europeans with screams of “Allahu Akbar” on their lips. Aren’t they bona fide ISIS-types? Well, that is a complicated issue. For example, did you notice the vast majority of these so-called “Islamic” crazies had strong ties to the European security services? That some of them even had traveled to Israel? Doesn’t it seem strange to you that their attacks somehow always seem to be scheduled to coincide with important political events in Europe? Could there have been a genuine ISIS attack in Europe? Yes. But I am pretty sure that most of them were Gladio-style false flags executed by EU or US special services.

Several points:

  • Yes, Islam is diverse, but blood and soil patriotism doesnt care what religion they worship. We care about race and they are still alien invaders. That doesn’t make us Anglo-Zionist shills.
  • Perhaps there was coordination with intelligence organs…or if we apply Occam’s Razor, perhaps violent low-IQ inbred Semites are simply prone to ackbaring wherever we find them in the world.
  • Yes, Shiites seem relatively better than their radical Sunni counterparts. Let’s support them in their struggle against ISIS, Israel, and the Gulf States, sure. But let them stay in their countries, and let us stay in ours.
  • Yes, the Jews are deliberately trying to stoke tension between Muslims and Christians. Yes, there is even reason to believe that the United States and Israel helped direct refugee flows to Europe. Being anti-Zionist does not make one automatically pro-Islam, just because they are not afraid to call Israel “the great Satan”.
  • Blaming it all on intelligence special operations, false flags or Jewish machination is to deny Muslims AGENCY. You’re basically saying that they are drooling retards with no say in the matter at all, just unwilling, stupid pawns. Let me throw some DR3 your way, you racist.

Saker isn’t the only one who seems to want Muslims (Arabs) to work together with Christians to defeat the “Anglo-Zionists”. It is a strange split that exists in the alternative media/dissident community.

Alain Soral is a great example.

You also see it when left-wingers protest Jewish Supremacism and come out in favor of Palestinian rights. I strongly suspect they get away with it because they portray Israelis as White (they are not) and label their government as Fascist (you could logically argue that tbh). They are fairly numerous and seem to enjoy punching right at blood and soil patriots. And hey, they are sometimes right in their criticisms. “Nationalists” that are pro-Israel and anti-Islam, (but won’t touch the race question) are clearly obfuscating the truth when they shill for the Jews and demand that we bomb Iran.

No one is denying that on the Alt-Right — we just call them Neocons.

But back to the article. Saker makes this whopper of a claim:

Mosques are here to stay in Europe too, and the short-sighted who don’t know history will view this as the end of their civilization and they are the ones who, without ever realizing it, will uselessly delay the eventual defeat of Takfirism in Europe and elsewhere. Those who do understand the real dynamics at play will see this as something very different: a chance at rebirth and a fantastic opportunity to truly crush Takfirism both at home and abroad.

He then uses Russia as an example of Muslims getting along well with the locals.

“Look how peaceful the mosque in the background looks!”- the senile old man proclaims.

Spoiler, THEY DON’T.

So who is the Saker? He got doxxed by a Serbian lady as a result of a dispute around the Charlie Hebdo massacres, so we know quite a lot about the guy. The story starts with a disagreement about the blog’s stance towards Muslims:

…By opportune chance, through a mutual friend, I chanced upon an article by the talented Serbian expat writer Aleksandar Lambros, in which he lambasts (no pun intended) the idiots who were not “seeing the connection” between Islamic fundamentalism and the Charlie Hebdo massacre. I have little in common with Mr. Lambros, aside from an admiration for his writing style and intellectual integrity, but I was happy to translate his Serbian into English in order to achieve a sense of balance with respect to Charlie Hebdo. Being neither Charlie nor prepared to massacre satirical staff, I was somewhat in a quandry.

I was gently (and I do emphasize ~ gently ~) reprimanded by my “brother Russian” that although I had complete editorial freedom, this did not extend as far as insulting members of the Muslim community (as the article of Aleksandar Lambros apparently did). I told him (most ungraciously, I admit) to go fuck himself and who was he, after all, to explain to a Serb, 600 years under the Ottoman yoke, the situation with Muslims? His response was that “all Serbs are crazy” (meaning me and Aleksandar Jovanovic, I guess) and that I just didn’t see he was properly respectful of Islam (whose teachings he openly compares with the teachings of the Holy Fathers of the Christian Church) “just like Putin admires and respects Kadhyrov”.

The Grand Strategist he is not. I did my research on Andrei Raevsky aka the Saker ex post facto and determined that he was a Swiss citizen who had already some difficulties with the Russians with respect to Chechnya. By his own admission, he was sent there as an employee of the International Red Cross and subsequently fired for his pro-Chechen bias. He later went on record in several published works as being critical of the Russian Army’s “heavy-handed approach” towards the Chechen terrorists.

He was then apparently hired on by the  United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) out of Geneva, which sent him on several tours to ex-Yugoslavia, specifically, he claims to have been involved in “disarmament negotiations” (which can only have been detrimental to the local Serbs) in Croatia and Bosnia. Having thus cemented his friendship with the Serbs, he immigrated to the USA and underwent further grooming at the Paul H. Nitzke School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University, the happy hunting ground of the likes of Madeleine Albright, Condoleeza Rice. He now lives on the Atlantic coast of the state of Florida within a stone’s throw of some 30 military installations who have no problems with his primary activities: broadcasting war against the phantom “Anglo-Zionist empire” (in the cartoon where the Western sponsored ISIL are the good guys) and soliciting donations from his (chiefly left-leaning) supporters in exchange for kitschy wallets imprinted with the Saker image, and autographed copies of his book. Like any good apologist for Islam, Raevsky is also a rabid anti-Semite.

I still believe Russians are our brothers but I don’t believe that Andrei Raevsky is one of them. He is a hybrid, a GMO if you will, of Russian soul fertilized by select Western ideology. It cannot thrive, it should not multiply. It will perish.

The greatest problem that we face now is the quiet ethnic replacement of White people in their ethnic homelands. Choosing to side with the cancer that’s killing you to defeat the other cancer that’s killing you is missing the point.

The Alt-Right stance in a nutshell.

Saker’s constant Boomer blubbering about the differences between radical Takfiri Islam and all those other benign forms of Islam completely miss the point. And he’s not the only one. The Alt-Lite makes the same mistake with their BASED X nonsense.

True blood and soil patriots do not differentiate between pacifist Buddhists suddenly starting to immigrate to Europe en masse or vegetarian Hindus in colorful saris that just want to worship their elephant god in peace.

Saker’s character is just like that of the clueless old monks stumbling towards the beach to greet the arrivals at the end of the book.

But wait, Hindus don’t have a “convert or die!” mentality!

True.

Muslims are by the worst of any immigrant group (except perhaps Blacks). I would prefer a massive immigration of Thai people if I had to choose. We would be flooded with massage parlors, Pad Thai and lady-boys instead of bombings, beheadings, and cheap kebab. But I would still be against a massive non-White immigration into my country to replace me and my own.

I would be against mass Thai immigration on the grounds that they are racially alien. It’s not about Shintoism or Daoism or Jainism or BASED ___ religion. I don’t care if Muslims are better at keeping their women in line, and are anti-degeneracy (debatable). I don’t care if Takfirism is a subversion of a great religion of peace and tolerance (very debatable). None of it belongs in White countries. Saker and his kind of “dissidents” are completely missing the point on the greatest issue of our time. If the Saker is arguing in good faith (and I believe he is) then it just highlights what I believe to be a generational divide.

Men like him will never know what it means to live in a White minority. They have never truly experienced Vibrant Diversity. The much younger members of the Alt-Right have, and we are shaped by that experience in ways that an older White man living in Whitetopia never will. Our form of dissent is the future, and we will soon dominate the alternative media narrative. At least, in this case, time and demographics are on our side.

Vincent Law
the authorVincent Law
I have a Hatreon now! If you like my writing and want me to write more, consider supporting me there. https://hatreon.net/vlaw/