I’m sure everyone agrees it will be interesting to see how long this lasts.

President Trump rode a populist backlash against the political establishment into the White House. The president of Goldman Sachs is the last person on earth we expected to find at his side much less pushing out the very people who we identify with the most in his administration:

“For years now, pundits have been tantalized by the notion that Donald Trump would make an historic pivot, roll back his most chaotic ideas, and return to the comfortably narrow range of political debate. During the campaign, Trump always frustrated this triumph of hope over experience. But in the last several days, Trump has actually pivoted.

It’s just that he’s pivoted into Jeb Bush. …

It would not be out of place to see Jeb Bush endorse every single one of these positions. They reflect the stodgy business Republicanism America has come to expect since the 1980s. We’ve already seen an extreme focus on the core Republican ideas of deregulation and tax cuts. Now we can add in Cohn-ism, which reveres globalization, puts the US market into a bidding war to achieve geopolitical outcomes, hands out gifts to financial interests and multinationals, and keeps the global pecking order stable, with the United States firmly in imperial control. Please clap. …

Let’s learn a little about our new president, Gary Cohn. He was the guy who ran Goldman’s mortgage department, turning it into an enormous trading operation that fueled the housing bubble. He was the guy who then bet against the housing market without disclosing that to investors, illegally ripping their faces off for profit. He was the guy who exported deceptive finance schemes to Greece, facilitating their decade of depression. He’s now putting that disregard for anyone not in an Italian suit to work for you. If you liked Goldman Sachs pulling the strings in Washington, you’re going to love it when they’re actually running the show directly. …”

As we enter the Globalist Gary era, Trump’s “America First” base will begin to melt away faster than an ice cream cone in July under the Alabama sun:

“As power struggles and ideological battles engulfed the White House, an unlikely player is exercising new influence on the direction of President Trump’s administration.

Gary Cohn, a former Goldman Sachs president, is capitalizing on his new position as director of Trump’s National Economic Council to push a centrist vision and court bipartisan support on some of Trump’s top agenda items such as tax reform and a $1 trillion infrastructure plan. …

In a White House short on experienced personnel, Cohn has found an edge by hiring two dozen policy experts, most with government experience. His team produced detailed proposals on overhauling the tax code, rebuilding infrastructure, cutting back financial regulations and restructuring international trade deals. He is widely considered a future candidate to be chief of staff. …”

Cohn’s stature among the top advisers is notable because he is one of the few who played no role in the campaign…”

I was ticked off when the news broke in December that Gary Cohn was being appointed director of the National Economic Council. Even then, I never imagined him sidelining Steve Bannon in less than three months or the ludicrous notion that he could be “a future candidate to be chief of staff.”

We didn’t vote for Jared Kushner or Gary Cohn. For some reason, we never heard much about these two individuals during the campaign. In fact, this is what we were told in October at the depths of Trump’s campaign in the aftermath of the release of the Access Hollywood tape:

“For those who control the levers of power in Washington, and for the global special interests, they partner with these people that don’t have your good in mind. Our campaign represents a true existential threat like they haven’t seen before.

It’s a global power structure that is responsible for the economic decisions that have robbed our working class, stripped our country of its wealth and put that money into the pockets of a handful of large corporations and political entities.

The Clinton machine is at the center of this power structure. We’ve seen this first hand in the WikiLeaks documents, in which Hillary Clinton meets in secret with international banks to plot the destruction of U.S. sovereignty in order to enrich these global financial powers, her special interest friends and her donors. …”

The future of our civilization was on the line. Nov. 8 was going to be our “Independence Day.”

In his darkest moment, we all rallied to Trump to stop these “international banks” and “global financial powers.” He ended up winning the election in a shocking upset victory because so many people who had given up on the system responded to his appeal. Are you telling me the result of that was to empower Globalist Gary and moderate New York business interests?

Leave a Reply

59 Comments on "Meet Globalist Gary"

Notify of
avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
))) Depeche Europa (((
Guest
))) Depeche Europa (((
We in the Alt-Right knew that Stephen Miller and Jared Kushner were at the heart of the Trump Campaign……. We knew that Trump kept talking about Carl Icahn…….. Trump was going to ‘Bring in the KIllers’ to make his Trade Deals (Globalist Gary?)……… Stephen Miller didn’t seem to be a Globalist Neocon……. The Speeches he wrote for Trump seemed to be Populist Nationalism……… Carl Icahn seemed to be down with MAGA…… There were plenty of Jeews who were down with MAGA……….at least it seemed so…….. Then, the Relentless Beating from the Media in Collusion with Graham/McCain/Deep State…….. …..with the Russian… Read more »
J.j. Cintia
Guest

The system cannot be reformed. Civil War II is now inevitable. All of you have to face facts, these idiots are just parasites. THEY CANNOT LIVE WITHOUT A HOST.

SebastianX19
Guest
Trump also said over and over that “America must start winning again,” AND “we must rebuild our military.” Those of us who read between the lines instead of little essays by the Supreme Dark Lord on the God Emperor knew what an American businessman meant by that: buy Raytheon, McDonnell-Douglas-Boeing, Goodrich, Pratt & Whitney, etc, as we were about to have a bonanza in military-industrial equities. And we are. You have leeway domestically but you cannot change foreign policy too much. Trump always had an ugly American militaristic side. Tillerson is precisely the type of man he hangs out with.… Read more »
Kumiko Oumae
Guest

Gary Cohn was actually mentioned several times during the campaign as being on Trump’s list of ‘people that Trump likes’. It’s just that the Alt-Right section of Trump’s voting base deliberately chose to ignore this. Trump’s base also deepened the denialism by vociferously tarring anyone who raised these issues as “anti-White”.

“Anti-White” became the new “anti-Semitic”, in both function and — as you are all finally now willing to admit — in content as well.

Siberian
Guest

“Trump’s base also deepened the denialism by vociferously tarring anyone who raised these issues as ‘anti-White’.”

Case in point: https://disqus.com/home/discussion/radixjournal/the_napoleon_of_the_current_year_91/#comment-2982424372comment image

ThomasER916
Guest

Hillary is much worse than Trump. You’re a total fucking retard if you believe otherwise.

MylesStandish
Guest
The Drumpf debacle sure uncovered the morons and foreign agents within looks huwhite to me nationalism. Forget Cohn, Kushner, Sater, Greenblatt, Mnuchin, Ari Emmanuel and the scores of other miscreants – Drumpf himself is not even a real American. None of his grandparents were born here; he’s an anchor baby. He has a Yiddish accent and casually uses Yiddish dialect. His Yiddish immigrant grandfather was a pimp and saloon keeper. He is trash and a low-rent conman, everyone knows that. Well, almost everyone. The shameless, greasy e-celebs of the alt-right somehow missed it, and their poor, deluded hillbilly followers were… Read more »
Kumiko Oumae
Guest

Yes indeed, and well said.

Half of these people who are angry with me now, actually just hate me because I was actually one of the people who was at the spear-tip of vectoring the exposure of Mister Enoch’s massive fraud in the WN-space and Chan-space:

Part 1. https://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/trs_founder_michael_enoch_peinovich_exposed_as_being_a_russian_jew_16012017
Part 2. https://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/next_level_trs_michael_enoch_enockson_peinovich_sippel_21012017
Part 3. https://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/trs_asks_people_for_more_face_to_face_meetings_01022017

They will never forgive me for doing that. It’s the elephant in the room, they are still upset about getting exposed as corrupt swampy frauds.

Celestial Time
Guest
the Alt-Right section of Trump’s voting base deliberately chose to ignore this. In the world I live in, we call that a tacit tactical position to take when all other options lead to an even more unpredictable and unfavorable outcome. Some people did choose to ignore the writing on the wall for whatever reason. What those exact reasons are only they can tell you. But your assertion that anyone and everyone was being tarred with “anti-White” is a convenient distortion of reality, because the main people that were really being targeted were/are the people that have always been anti-White or… Read more »
Kumiko Oumae
Guest
Looks like someone got triggered by that. In the midst of you non-ironically calling me anti-American as though I give a damn about your flag, you did manage to give this amazing quote: I did choose to ignore aspects of Trump only up until a time when it became more advantageous to not ignore them and more forcefully push them into the spotlight. So, you admit that you did choose, deliberately, to ignore the American Zionist creatures that comprised the Trump team, ‘until it became more advantageous to not ignore them’. In other words, you waited until after the damage… Read more »
Eugen
Guest

It sounds to me like he accepted Trump for what he is and supported him as long as he damaged the anti-white agenda with his campaign rhetoric.

Which is the reasonable thing to do. Just like holding Trump to his promises.

PS: If you hate the expression anti-white you’re most likely anti-white. No need to over-think it.

Celestial Time
Guest
Triggered just like you were triggered when White people started firing back with anti-White accusations? What was so amazing about my quote when you put it in the context where it was placed? Yes, you stammering moron, I did choose to ignore negative aspects of Trump during the election. I’ve said that since day one. I’ve said the gains the pro-White sphere would realize would come from the energy and rhetoric that built him up into a force that went against the Left-Right paradigm, not necessarily his policies he pushed for once he got into office. In other words, you… Read more »
Kumiko Oumae
Guest
Such an emotional response you’ve delivered there, and one ticks all the communications boxes for the demography you’re appealing to, but so little of actual substance in it. I will give you some credit for deploying the Whitaker-style ending, though. Calling me anti-American and then anti-White on two separate lines at the end as though these are synonyms. I can imagine that you actually put some thought into that presentation. It almost makes it look like you derived that conclusion from something other than your own imagination. The place where you fell down was on the part where you called… Read more »
Celestial Time
Guest

I was going to respond and slice your comment apart, but then I realized you’ve given me all the proof I need to show just how much BS an anti-White can fit into a statement, without actually saying anything relevant to the requests or questions posed to them.

How’s this for Content-wise avoidance:

But go ahead and explain to all of the pro-White people here what exactly it was we should have been doing and who exactly we should have been supporting.

I’ve asked you before. Why am I still having to ask you now? Any day now.

Multicultural Wars
Guest

Kumiko and her views have been a subject of criticism at the blog EGI Notes:

http://eginotes.blogspot.com/2017/03/the-raving-madness-of-silk-road-white.html

Celestial Time
Guest

MR is not a pro-White site. It is an anti-White, pro-Asian site

100% accurate assessment.

He/She/It/They use anti-Zionist talking points to mask their true intentions.

Kumiko Oumae
Guest
And I swiftly responded at that time, here: https://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/britain_as_a_pacific_trading_power_in_the_21st_century_04032017#c151954 EGI Notes is run by Ted Sallis, and he has a bizarre anti-Asian worldview that causes him to see a conspiracy behind everything I write. He even believes that my support for Brexit was a sign of me being supposedly ‘anti-White’. And that my desire to prevent an Iran war, is a feature of my ‘anti-Whiteness’. As I said at that time: Kumiko Oumae / Majorityrights.com, ‘A view of Brexit from Asia: Britain as a Pacific trading power in the 21st century.’, 07 Mar 2017: Taken to its logical conclusion, if… Read more »
Celestial Time
Guest

Bizarre anti-Asian worldviews should be a forgone conclusion when you have Asians going to pro-White sites to ridicule White people for not allowing their views to be shaped by Asian fetishists. Of course you’ll think they’re bizarre—you’re Asian. Or you at least claim to be.

Kumiko Oumae
Guest
Or in other words, in your view, your bizarre anti-Asian responses to everything I say, is an inevitable phenomenon because I’ve been pushing anti-Zionist talking points, anti-Zionist strategies, and anti-Zionist narratives so hard that it has somehow hurt your feelings, and that has caused some of you to react by attacking my race. It’s a really transparent deflection. Let’s call it ‘Argmentum ad Asiatica‘. Whenever I signal against Israel, some of you quite strangely will respond by signalling against Asia and professing that I have hurt your feelings. The only question that remains to be answered is: Why do my… Read more »
Celestial Time
Guest

You’re anti-White. Once you’ve crossed that threshold, all the pretense of anti-Zionism goes out the window.

Kumiko Oumae
Guest
You seriously wrote this: You’re anti-White. Once you’ve crossed that threshold, all the pretense of anti-Zionism goes out the window. Hahahah. Interesting tautology and contradiction in one. It was established earlier that your definition of ‘anti-White’ is ‘someone who does not support Donald Trump’s administration’. However, Trump is an ardent Zionist surrounded by Zionists who is being breifed by the Mossad ( http://thehill.com/policy/international/310948-mossad-chief-met-with-trump-team ) and is the head of what is basically a ‘Zionist Occupied Government’ ( http://thehill.com/policy/international/311972-trump-stay-strong-israel-my-inauguration-is-approaching ) in full. Therefore your assertion could actually be rendered as this absurdity: “In order to be anti-Zionist you have to support… Read more »
Celestial Time
Guest
No, it was your assertion that everyone on the Alt-Right accuses people of being anti-White for not supporting Trump. Don’t try to attach your rhetoric to me. I’ve come across many people who didn’t support Trump. I wouldn’t necessarily call them anti-White for that alone. But you’re still anti-White. Hiding it behind an Asian screen name and a facade of anti-Zionist rhetoric doesn’t change that. I’m here on an Alt-Right site where you are trying your best to ridicule White people. I’m not on some Asian fetishist site trying to convert you. One of us seems to need the other… Read more »
Kumiko Oumae
Guest
I don’t even know how precisely to begin responding to that, because it doesn’t make any sense. You are not even being consistent with your own rhetoric. Sort this out: Is my Asian ethnic origin an overt element of the alleged ‘anti-Whiteness’ that you are accusing me of, or is it an asset that I’m using to cloak my alleged ‘anti-Whiteness’ behind? Decide which one you are going with and stick to it. Also, what ‘fetishism’ are you talking about? How does sex even come into this? I get that the Alt-Right is a very male space and that some… Read more »
Celestial Time
Guest
First things first. Where was it established earlier that my definition of ‘anti-White’ is ‘someone who does not support Donald Trump’s administration? Show me the quote where I stated that or even insinuated it. My assertion that you are just another anti-White really has nothing to do with you *supposedly* being Asian. It has everything to do with your comments in the past where you’ve sidestepped very direct questions about your motivations for haranguing pro-White people on pro-White websites. You are seeking out pro-White people to attack when most are going out of their way to avoid you. One comment… Read more »
Kumiko Oumae
Guest
I must have really hit a nerve with you, you’re pulling out everything including the kitchen sink to throw at me now. I’ll break down your post and respond to each item under the appropriate headings. Sowing division about ‘other threads!’ It has everything to do with your comments in the past where you’ve sidestepped very direct questions about your motivations for haranguing pro-White people on pro-White websites. You are seeking out pro-White people to attack when most are going out of their way to avoid you. Yeah, how about no. If I’m making comments that you don’t like on… Read more »
mancinblack
Guest

Morgoth as in “If Trump goes full retard and blows up half the planet it’s already well documented that the Alt-Right didn’t support him” Morgoth? shame about articles like this then, really…..
http://nwioqeqkdf.blogspot.com/2016/11/join-big-push.html#more

Kumiko Oumae
Guest
Pretty much, some of the articles that appear over there are basically disastrous, and contradict each other. And his response to the disaster was also disastrous. The areas where they are making obvious mistakes are the ones where I’m calculating they’ll be open to being influenced to change, since the errors are transparent and he is not emotionally wedded to America. There is a chance that he will come to see things our way eventually. So really the ‘respectful dialogue’ that I’m talking about is just a case of ‘sticking close to Morgoth’s venue and remaining engaged with them, can… Read more »
Celestial Time
Guest
Diversion & Deflection 101: Avoid answering direct questions and requests when asked to provide them by giving answers and responses to questions and requests that were never asked. Why is it so difficult for you to answer a few very simple and direct questions and requests without trying to send me to other websites and tell me you’ve already answered the questions? If you see a question mark without a heavy dose of sarcasm, then you should go ahead and assume they were not meant to be rhetorical questions. I don’t know who or what a Morgoth is. I do… Read more »
Kumiko Oumae
Guest
Diversion and Deflection 101 is not what I am doing, since I’ve answered all of your questions, including the ones you didn’t ask, but it serves as the perfect heading for your own response because that’s basically what you are doing. There are only two parts of your response which are worth responding to this time, the rest is squid-ink: You are most definitely anti-White. Hiding it behind a facade of anti-Zionism is just a convenient way for you to attack White people, believing you’ve put them in a position where you can say that since they oppose you, they… Read more »
Celestial Time
Guest
I should have called Diversion & Deflection 101 something a little more appropriate, like Diversion, Deflection & Obfuscation 101. You absolutely DO NOT answer direct questions. You dance around and avoid answering specifics by using a wall of verbose content and a steady stream of conjecture and vagueness. You are presented with examples of your own writing as proof of your anti-White attitudes. You then carry on as if you never said anything or that your own words aren’t relevant to your current arguments. Do you understand brevity? Do you understand the concept of simple questions only needing simple answers?… Read more »
Kumiko Oumae
Guest
For clarity, I’ll break this into two parts: 1 of 2: The scrollbar will suffice You stated earlier that my position was that someone who does not support Trump has to be anti-White. I don’t have to ‘prove’ anything to you. You’re basically doing that ridiculous tactic where if you are losing the argument, you’ll suddenly call foul on everything that happened previously and ask me to revisit it again. The scrollbar is the vehicle of truth. Anyone who wants to get a handle on your position can simply scroll up and see how you started out by saying that… Read more »
Celestial Time
Guest
You’re completely trolling this website now. I didn’t ask for clarity, I asked for brevity and a simple request for you to show me a quote of mine where your assertion can be shown to be true. You can’t even do that one little simple thing. You made the accusation and seem to have hinged your entire psychotic rant on a premise that you can’t even be bothered to try to prove. Want another example of your unhinged psychosis? The fact that you wanted total change but then you selected a Zionist New York billionaire and chanted “Let Trump be… Read more »
Kumiko Oumae
Guest
Now you are retreating into pop psychology, and accusing me of ‘trolling’, while you are pompously asking me for ‘brevity’ so that the argument will be easier for you. I am not going to give you that, because I don’t have to constrain my responses to the conditions that you’ve laid out. ‘Unhinged psychosis’ was a creative one though. Usually people just yell ‘sociopathy’ (eg, Stefan Molyneux sees the whole world through that prism, the antagonism between ‘neurotypicals’ and ‘sociopaths’) when things aren’t going their way. Cutting through all that though, let’s start here: Anti-Zionist means very little to me… Read more »
Celestial Time
Guest

You’re trolling because you can’t answer a simple question and request after you’ve made the accusation that I’ve said something that I did not.

Of course, you know this, that’s why it’s trolling.

Kumiko Oumae
Guest

Except I did answer it. You’re just pretending that I didn’t.

And after all this time, you still didn’t respond to the fact that I fully satisfied your original challenge to me ( https://disqus.com/home/discussion/altright-com/meet_globalist_gary/#comment-3256176405 ), and you simply chose not to answer it. It’s been almost 48 hours.

Everything that has happened on this intervening sub-thread has been your attempt to divert away from that, and now you have the actual gall to non-ironically accuse me of being evasive.

Celestial Time
Guest

Nope. You sure didn’t answer. You can prove it by responding with a simple quote of mine that I asked you to provide. You’ve avoided it for how many comments now?

Like I said, you avoid direct questions. You made an accusation that you obviously can’t be bothered to try to prove, so you pretend like you didn’t say it or say that you don’t have to prove it. Classic troll.

Kumiko Oumae
Guest
I totally answered it. Anyone reading the thread can see that I answered it without allowing you to define the parameters for what counts as valid proof. The fact that I don’t answer within the parameters that are convenient for you is not indicative of ‘trolling’, but rather is indicative of the fact that I am savvy enough to prevent you from controlling the whole discourse. If that makes me a ‘classic troll’, then it just means that all women and all political activists and all lobbyists are by their very natures ‘trolls’, since that’s where this dubious skillset is… Read more »
Celestial Time
Guest

You’re a fraud, Kumiko. You know you avoided the request. You can’t find any quotes of mine that back up your assertions, because they don’t exist. I’ve never said what you claim I’ve said. But you continue to claim that I’ve said it, while continuing to avoid a very simple request for you to show me the quote where I said it. That’s a troll.

Kumiko Oumae
Guest
Maybe you should just get some sleep, you almost sound like you need it. A lot of people have been unable to actually win arguments against me. The world is not going to end just because I’ve quite intelligently not allowed you to define the parameters of how I should make my side of the argument. It just means I did in fact manage to catch you in a position that you don’t like, and now I’m not going to let you slide out of it with ye olde classic “okay but it doesn’t count unless you can fetch me… Read more »
Celestial Time
Guest

About 118 words this time, and not a single sentence showing my quote you believe exists. You haven’t even attempted to answer inside of any parameters, not just my supposed parameters.

Kumiko Oumae
Guest

I never said that there was ‘a quote’. You claimed that I needed to have a seamless quote in order to establish what your viewpoint was. I rejected those parameters, and instead composited your viewpoint from the stances you had taken across several of your responses to me, and then from there I pivoted into criticising you on that basis.

I’m good at doing that, and so I did that.

Again, just quit while you’re behind. Utilising triple-bracketed lawyer tactics against me is not going to work. Instead it just looks weird.

Celestial Time
Guest
Your exact words: It was established earlier that your definition of ‘anti-White’ is ‘someone who does not support Donald Trump’s administration’. How is it my definition when I’ve never said that or even insinuated it? I’ve even made it very clear in the past that anyone putting any real kind of faith in Trump will be very disappointed in him. Then you said: The fact that you wanted total change but then you selected a Zionist New York billionaire and chanted “Let Trump be Trump”, is actually the single most unworkable thing ever, and that’s putting it kindly. How can… Read more »
Kumiko Oumae
Guest

I merely used the same method that you had used when you tried to establish that I am ‘anti-White’, even though there is no specific quote where I say “I am anti-White”. Where’s the quote for that? It doesn’t exist.

Except the difference is that I based my assessment of your stance on things that you actually said in this conversation (for example, you said at the beginning of this conversation that you supported Donald Trump “tactically” – tactical support is, objectively speaking a type of support), whereas you based your assessment of my stance on literally nothing whatsoever.

Celestial Time
Guest

Nope, you sure didn’t use the same method. It’s established(the real kind of established, not your kind of established) that you come to Alt-Right/pro-White websites to harass and harangue. I even provided one of your more splendid quotes where you call White people cancer. I have a pretty solid footing to make my accusations. You don’t.

So now you’re going to try to link “tactical support” to “anyone who doesn’t support Donald Trump is anti-White” as proof of your accusation? Logic and reason just aren’t on your side.

Kumiko Oumae
Guest

Yep, now you’ve brought two ridiculous paragraphs out. The first one is a deliberate and bold-faced distortion, and the second paragraph doesn’t even attempt to make sense.

Again, just give up. You established literally nothing, and now you are just wasting my time.

Celestial Time
Guest

So what you’re saying is that I’m like a cancer?

Kumiko Oumae
Guest
You mean you were totally going to respond and slice my comment apart, but you can’t. I’m anti-American (as of recently) and anti-Zionist (since always). That does not mean that I am ‘anti-White’. Regarding ‘any day now’, I’ve repeatedly described what White Americans ‘should have done’, in the full knowledge that you are not going to do it. Because you guys are very bad at all of this. On 31 Jan 2016, I wrote: Kumiko Oumae / Majorityrights.com, ‘Donald Trump stares into the abyss in Iowa as it stares into him. And also you.’, 31 Jan 2016 (emphasis added): […]… Read more »
Yehudah Finkelstein
Guest

Hand rubbing intenisifies!

Celestial Time
Guest

NeoCon Don must be dismantled piece by piece. Everything he says has to be used against him. If he happens to keep his word on some issues during the process of us picking him apart, then I think we should consider it a gift of atonement for his duplicity. We should argue that the only way to get anything from forked-tongue NeoCon Don is to oppose him every step of the way, no matter what he says or does. It sure seemed to work for for the NeverTrumpers, NeoCons and all those who didn’t support him, didn’t it?

davidex
Guest

I was interested to read Edward Luce in the UK’s Financial Times urging Trump to retain the advice and guidance of Steve Bannon. https://www.ft.com/content/43edc082-1df3-11e7-b7d3-163f5a7f229c

Pickle von Tickle™
Guest

What a disgusting (((creature))). Like a Madagascar hissing cockroach.

Pickle von Tickle™
Guest

comment image

.

Krafty Wurker
Guest

Stephen Schwarzman is a real piece of work too.

Ike35
Guest

Well at least we won’t have to listen to anymore “let’s wait and see” talk in our circle anymore. That ship has sailed off and struck an iceberg. I’m wondering what Hillary would’ve done differently? Probably not much at this point. Probably would’ve started bombing Syria a month earlier, that’s about it.

Jarod
Guest

You’re forgetting her plans for mass immigration, Merkel style.

Kumiko Oumae
Guest
You mean like this? The Daily Caller, ‘Trump Is Resettling Syrian Refugees At A Much Quicker Pace Than Obama’, 12 Apr 2017 (emphasis added): President Donald Trump called Syrian refugees a “great Trojan horse” during the 2016 campaign, but his administration has resettled them in a quicker pace than President Barack Obama did. Since Trump was inaugurated, 1,401 Syrian refugees have been resettled, State Department figures as of Wednesday reveal. This is more than double the 625 Syrian refugees resettled under President Obama in the same time frame last year. The president has admitted about a third fewer refugees from… Read more »
Ike35
Guest

Oh I haven’t forgotten, don’t worry. But I think that’ll be the next thing he reneges on. He certainly hasn’t done anything to stop or even slow the inflow of rapefugees.

Diversity Heretic
Guest

It’s Goldman Sachs’s world. We just live in it.