Media

Reality Calls – Kevin MacDonald

Tara McCarthy talks to Kevin MacDonald about the Jewish Question and Europe

Leave a Reply

11 Comments on "Reality Calls – Kevin MacDonald"

Notify of
avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
grumpiertrucker
Guest
So I showed up here awhile back when you dummies were saying, “Single Payer is the best option for helping the white man.” And I predicted the end of the Alt-Right because of it. Because we all know how Government Programs are designed and implemented to help white people. Look at what they’ve done for us to this point!!!! Awesome. So I’m back just wanting to make sure I’ve got this right: -So we are demanding Single Payer Health Care. -Bannon’s out, we’re good. Sessions recused, we’re good. Gorsuch blocked (for now) and we’re cool. Flynn gone, super. Nunes recused… Read more »
Michael
Guest

whats your plan?

Ed Edgerton
Guest

At 4:10, Prof. MacDonald ironically says “If people don’t want to hear what you are saying they call it a conspiracy theory.” I hope he thinks about this the next time he dismisses a conspiracy theory. You have to spend time learning the facts of a conspiracy theory and not just dismiss it based on the assumption that officials and the media could not possibly be lying.

Ed Edgerton
Guest
Around 3:00, they talk about how the “conspiratorial” aspect of the JQ puts people off. Prof. MacDonald says that conspiracy-minded people think that every major event is a conspiracy, including plane crashes. This is not true. Speaking as one of those conspiracy-minded people, I have not heard much about conspiracies involving plane crashes, aside from 9/11 and the deaths of a few politicians. We conspiracy minded folks do base our inquiries on facts. The difference is that we give greater weight to some facts than mainstream-minded folks like Prof. MacDonald (in the context of conspiracies). Mainstreamers dismiss anything that does… Read more »
ThomasER916
Guest

You didn’t listen to what he said at all.

Ed Edgerton
Guest

You are exaggerating. It is part of what he was saying.

If someone refuses to believe something because it is morally unacceptable to them, they do not admit to themselves that this is the reason. They tell themselves that the thing they disbelieve is false. Thus the distinction you are trying to make does not really exist, as far as subjective beliefs are concerned.

ThomasER916
Guest

Wrong.

Whites are instinctively concerned with universal morals.
Non-Whites are instinctively concerned with tribal morals.

That’s the difference between White and non-White thinking.

Ed Edgerton
Guest

To the extent that this is true, it doesn’t make any difference. What I wrote is still true. No white will say “I refuse to believe in X because it is morally unacceptable.”

ThomasER916
Guest

You are wrong because that’s exactly what Whites say in great numbers especially when it comes to White racial self-interest.

Ed Edgerton
Guest

You are mixing things up. You keep saying “you are wrong” and backing up your assertion with brief comments that don’t prove anything. I don’t want to continue this discussion.

Ed Edgerton
Guest

That’s not what he was saying at all.

Stop exaggerating. What I typed is almost exactly what he said.

Subjectively, there is no clear distinction between “morally unacceptable” and “false.”

wpDiscuz