Racism is a defense mechanism. To advance one’s ethnic genetic interests is to promote one’s own above all others. What is beneficial for whites carries more weight than what is good for an abstract humanity, which as an ideal to cherish and worship only exists in the gospels spread by the Church of Liberalism and the prophets of Third Worldism. The concept of humanity is purely abstract in nature as it has no anchor to stop it from drifting into meaninglessness and no roots that nourish it with the double meaning of identity and familiarity. People who believe themselves to be only part of humanity and nothing else are living in a zoo. Belonging to humanity is like belonging to the animal kingdom as a whole. It carries zero emotional attachment. One cannot be rooted in no one’s humanity; one can only be rooted in one’s race.

The majority of Europeans live in constant fear of being labeled “racist.” Racism is the ultimate crime and the new and improved original sin. In the contemporary West, a racist is considered beyond the pale, an outcast, a person to be shunned by “civilized” society. A racist is a witch who has the power to lure unsuspecting and innocent youths into the gingerbread house of hate, where the latter easily fall prey to the former’s beguiling charms and cunningly uttered curses. Once thus cursed, the innocent youths are on the sure path of becoming bedeviled outcasts themselves. The vicious circle comes again back to bite its serpentine tail. Once the Forbidden Fruit has been bitten into, the only option is a swift and forced exit from the Garden of Multicultural Eden. The establishment and the media, together with their large army of fawning beta cucks, wield their flaming sword of damnation over every sinner who dared to trespass the bounds of internalized “civility.”

Contrary to what insane leftists believe, the problem is not that Europeans are inherently too racist. The real problem is that Europeans are not nearly racist enough. There can be no love without hate. The principle of dualism teaches us that a positive can only be sustained by a negative. Racism combines both light and dark, compassion and rejection. To be happy with the familiar, one must reject the alien. If the stranger wants to dispossess, rape and kill you, why invite him into your house and feed and clothe him? The witch fattens up Hansel because she wants to eat him. Europeans fatten up the stranger because they want to be eaten by him. Modern Europe is a fairy tale world in overdrive reverse.

A person named Ali Akbar can never be a Brit, no matter if he was born in Britain or not. Nevertheless, the media and naive or deluded whites believe in the insane and totally ridiculous notion that being born on a certain territory miraculously makes one a member of the extended family that has inhabited said territory for millennia. Ali Akbar’s genes are alien spores that contribute to the destruction of the once pristine natural habitat that the extended family has toiled in for countless generations. A nation is foremost a conglomerate of people related by blood. One can transplant a nation from one piece of land to another. The nation will still remain the same nation. Thus Jews in New York belong to the same Jewish nation as Jews in Rotterdam. Blood is primary, soil only secondary. Blood before soil! Biopolitics trumps geopolitics!

“Europe a nation” is essentially a racist concept since it explicitly stipulates that only genetic Europeans (and not fake paper Europeans) have the right to live in Europe, which includes all traditionally white countries, like America and Australia. Genetic non-Europeans might be welcome as guests but none of them have the right to settle in Europe permanently. The current invasion of Europe by non-whites can therefore be considered an attack on the racial integrity of the European motherland. That this assault is conducted by stealth and with the apparent quiet acquiescence of the majority of genetic Europeans is beside the point. This violation of European soil AND blood is without parallel in history. Refusing to look this ugly reality in the face will not make it go away. Waking up to it is the first step and maybe the hardest.

We should not fall into the trap of cultural relativism. It is pure poison. We can objectively conclude, solely based on empirical evidence, that some cultures are more advanced and hence more valuable than others. The whole purpose of evolution is for the species to move ever higher. A race that has the capability to move among the stars is thus infinitely worthier of preserving than a race who has not evolved on its own in thousands of years of human history. The latter serves no purpose in the cosmic order while the former can expand the boundaries of the cosmos and thereby serve the purpose of existence, namely the will to grow beyond itself into the infinite. The late John Tyndall was right when he said that the moon landing was not “a giant leap for mankind” but a giant leap for the white race!

Racism is a defense mechanism. To advance one’s ethnic genetic interests is to promote one’s own above all others. What is beneficial for whites carries more weight than what is good for an abstract humanity, which as an ideal to cherish and worship only exists in the gospels spread by the Church of Liberalism and the prophets of Third Worldism. The concept of humanity is purely abstract in nature as it has no anchor to stop it from drifting into meaninglessness and no roots that nourish it with the double meaning of identity and familiarity. People who believe themselves to be only part of humanity and nothing else are living in a zoo. Belonging to humanity is like belonging to the animal kingdom as a whole. It carries zero emotional attachment. One cannot be rooted in no one’s humanity; one can only be rooted in one’s race.

Race is being and concreteness. Racially heterogeneous societies are vague and blurry as they provide no focus in terms of visible goals that benefit all of their members equally. Racially homogeneous societies offer solid foundations on which all members can build individually and as a collective. A multiracial society is a house built on ever-shifting sand with only crumbling soil as its basis. A monoracial society, on the other hand, is a fortress with enduring blood as its bedrock. Soil is always subservient to blood. The only healthy nation is the nation that protects the blood of its citizens. Blood nationalism > soil nationalism.

People who condemn racism are the enemy. Race nationalism is the only valid nationalism. “Racialism” is defeatism as one does not need to respect something simply because it exists. Emphasizing that one is a “racialist” and not a racist is nothing more than virtue signaling. Denial is a sin. Nobody wants to follow in the footsteps of Saint Peter. We must hate that which wants to kill us. No cheek and no quarter must be given.

Constantly emphasizing that one is a “racialist” opposed to the supposed evils of racism is a despicable sign of weakness of character. Other races are openly racist against whites and nobody bats an eyelid. But we have people allegedly on the Right who profess their outrage when somebody calls them racist. These so-called “right-wingers” then habitually pull out their tired “100% identity – 0% racism” card. As if this was the most natural thing in the world! Thank God reality teaches us otherwise on a daily basis. One merely has to go for a stroll in certain districts of Detroit or New Orleans. Possessing identity without the accompanying racism is unnatural and a biological impossibility. All people are tribal in nature, both in a defensive AND offensive manner. The feeling of disgust is mutual.

The Dream of the White Race: The white race opens the portal and sheds its skin.

#MakeRacismAcceptableAgain

 

  • Evolver1

    White Racism is a very good thing. You are blessed if you have the White Racist Gene. It helps keep you safe and helps keep you from miscegenating your family line and your genome into oblivion.

    Stay White Racist, my friends.

  • Alek

    It’s getting more hard-core around here all the time.

  • craicher

    Good one.

  • Europe

    If a dog borns in a horse stable he is not a horse!! Jus Sanguinis it´s the only way to move forward in creating a ethnostate.

  • Probably foolish to try to rehabilitate the word “racism.”

    What the word means, to 99.999% of the people in the West, is: The races all have the same innate capacities, and “racists” are mentally ill people who deny this.

    Best way to deal with the word is to argue that it is not a valid concept, because it implies but does not prove irrationality. It’s a form of question begging. Take the word away. Do not allow it to be used as an arguing device. Our enemies will then have to honestly discuss the nature and implications of racial differences.

  • Scott Schroeder

    When you affirm your enemy’s weaponized terms, you empower your enemy even if you intend to do the opposite. The main term anti-whites use to maintain their power is “racist.” That term has to be delegitimized, destroyed, demolished, not affirmed, not redefined, not legitimized in any way. There’s a couple of ways to go about this.

    Racist is an anti-white hate slur. It’s just like calling a Jew a kike or a mestizo a wetback. Would a Jew argue about whether or not he’s a kike?

    Racist is the anti-white’s term for heretic. If you call me a racist, you’re saying I’m a heretic to the Religion of Anti-whitism. Well, I am not of your faith. If a Muslim calls a Christian an infidel would it make sense for the Christian to argue about whether or not he is an infidel? Whether you are an infidel/heretic or not depends on your faith.

    IN YOUR OPINION I’m a racist. Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

    What you NEVER do is affirm the term racist. You never say “Yes, I’m a racist” or “No I’m not a racist” or “(Fill in the blank) are the REAL racists!” Have you ever heard a lefty say “Republicans are the real Communists!” -? That’s because leftists know how power works.

    I’m pro-white. My enemies are anti-white.

    Being pro-white makes me a supremacist in your opinion? Anti-supremacist is a code word for anti-white.
    Being pro-white makes me a Nazi in your opinion? Anti-Nazi is a code word for anti-white.

    This is Politics 101. If you don’t get this right, you’re never going to take power and you’re never going to accomplish anything.

    • Fearan Iarthair

      Excellent points, all. I offer an additional comparative term for “racist,” the word “witch.” I actually prefer it to “heretic.” In societies where it is used, –pre-modern Europe/America and current-day Africa–the charge of witchcraft blames someone for something bad occurring, the cause of which is not obvious. Magically, the witch is able to cause unfortunate events through secret evil means.

      Western people no longer believe it witches, but they all believe in racists. And these terms function in exactly the same way: they stigmatize someone as the evil source of a situation they don’t like and can’t (or won’t) explain.

      I especially support your point of neither affirming or denying one’s “racism,” since it only keeps alive the most destructive idea of the later 20th century.

    • Evolver1

      Some good points and when I’ve been asked by the press if I am a racist, I will sometime reply by asking them to define the term. Then,l I reply to the individual elements of their definition and turn those elements around on them. And,I won’t usually conclude that I am a racist, because that will often be the only thing I say that they report and all the rest of my words aren’t mentioned. Of course at other times I will proudly accept the term racist or racialist. It depends on the audience and their level of understanding of what I mean and if I feel that I can get things in context with a little of the science behind my racism and what the term means to me.

      Alternatively, an argument can be made that calling oneself a racist and going large and over the top with it works to neutralize the negativity of the term in the same way that gays will often call themselves faggots. When I respond in this manner I will usually say: “Correction. I am not a racist. I am a White racist and I then define what I mean.

      • Scott Schroeder

        If the term racist had never existed how would you define yourself?

        • Evolver1

          White geneist.

  • MisterCreeper97

    Making a very basic human instinct taboo is abhorrent. I basically accept that by their definition I am a racist and I can’t shake that away, no matter how much I present myself as an Identitarian or Nationalist. Their first instinct is to denounce me as a bigot. And my first instinct shouldn’t be a defensive “I am not a racist, because I’m decent human being, etc.”, it should be “You can call me that if you like. See that it doesn’t hold me down. See that my arguments fundamentally come from Reality and cannot be so simply disregarded. I have a right to self-preservation and my race has a right to self-preservation.”

  • Diversity Heretic

    Loving one’s own race does not mean hating any other race, unlss that race is threatening your own. The proper response to other races is graduated indifference. I love my own children more than I love yours but i do not hate yours, I am just slightly more indifferent to your children than mine if we are the same race. I do not hate sub-Saharan Africans in the least when they are in Angola or Nigeria (although I think that they do need to be expelled from Europe and put in a separate country in a partitioned North America). But I am indifferent to their fate–I genuineliy hope that they prosper but if they do not, I do not care. I have similar attitudes towards Arabs and Asians.

    Racism as a term is probably so toxic that a new one needs to be devised. Race realist is one suggestion, but I’m up for others.

    • Southernshitlord

      As I said above prejudiced has a nice ring to it.

  • pgg804

    Make racism great again. LOL

    I can see why we would start thinking that. We’re destroying ourselves with our concern for others. But I think that goes too far. Europeans (whites) can and should put their own people first but I don’t think it’s necessary to hate others to do that.

    • Southernshitlord

      You don’t have to hate or hurt for that matter to be a racist. I think you can wish the best for other races and still be a damn racist. Think of it more as good old fashioned prejudice.

  • richard garyson

    I take it as a compliment when I am accused of being a racist, and usually thank the person.

  • Man of White Skin

    Great article mate. I agree with you 100%! Keep the prejudice flowing.

  • BlisteringBarnacles! 2017!

    Load of rubbish.

  • Vlad le Putin

    Racism is a completely natural response. We must become both discriminatory and racist again if we are too survive. I see on Twitter all the time, why don’t you care about X people. Why? The simplest answer is their not my people, so no I could not care less what happens too them. Some others made some great points that we need to phrase it in a “I’m pro-white and group X is anti-white”. I think that is brilliant. The best part is, it is true, I view all non-whites as anti-white. They should return to their countries of origin, and be near their own kind.