I don’t think any Westerners *want* anything like a truck attack or knifing spree. Multiculturalism – certainly, but not events like this.
Political elites like multiculturalism because fractured societies are easier to play for money and power. It’s also tactical for those fishing for careers in government to support policies that decay social capital and create demand for diversified interests, because it increases the number of potential lucrative niches for one to fill. For instance, if the U.S. did not have all the various identity-based lobbying groups that it currently does, there would be (tens of?) thousands of people out of jobs. Thus, “journalists”, think-tank contributors, etc. tend to be globalist.
As far as the common man… well, this phenomenon applies more to Europe (with its sterile SmartCars, hole-in-the-wall apartments, childless lives, etc.), but he benefits by finding meaning in his life by championing “diversity” and “tolerance”, as thought these are the attributes that give life the most profound purpose. This is extraordinarily convenient, as it gives the common man the same feelings of self-actualization as those that must be experienced by soldiers who go to war for the countries and families they love. Of course, championing “diversity” is a totally passive act, so we now have a few generations’ worth of Westerners who think that by sitting in their living rooms and soaking up BBC, NBC, CNN, etc. propaganda, they’ve reached the height of moral achievement.
“For instance, if the U.S. did not have all the various identity-based lobbying groups that it currently does, there would be (tens of?) thousands of people out of jobs.”
No, that isn’t sound logic. Before the counter-culture movement of the 1960’s, America (and all Western nations) had only one “identity group”. “American” in America, “British” in Great Britian… You get the gist. And unemployment was pretty near nil, at least during certain periods.
If we smashed the identity-based lobbying groups TODAY, yes, some people (vermin) would be out of work.
thank you…. good one
Millennial Woes is such a marvelous speaker. He has the timing of a great stand-up comic as he mocks the globalizers.
An hour MW … we don’t get the time back…. #I’m A Lumberjack And I’m OK ..
Brilliant analysis — many thanks to Millenial Woes for his long-running service to “enlightenment”
Good question my Scottish brother!!!!!! Who benefits from all of this chaos?
Aside from better restaurants, there is no benefit!!!
The elite benefit from the fear and division!!!!!!
rothschilds/royals etc
The elites benefit from cheaper labor.
I don’t think any Westerners *want* anything like a truck attack or knifing spree. Multiculturalism – certainly, but not events like this.
Political elites like multiculturalism because fractured societies are easier to play for money and power. It’s also tactical for those fishing for careers in government to support policies that decay social capital and create demand for diversified interests, because it increases the number of potential lucrative niches for one to fill. For instance, if the U.S. did not have all the various identity-based lobbying groups that it currently does, there would be (tens of?) thousands of people out of jobs. Thus, “journalists”, think-tank contributors, etc. tend to be globalist.
As far as the common man… well, this phenomenon applies more to Europe (with its sterile SmartCars, hole-in-the-wall apartments, childless lives, etc.), but he benefits by finding meaning in his life by championing “diversity” and “tolerance”, as thought these are the attributes that give life the most profound purpose. This is extraordinarily convenient, as it gives the common man the same feelings of self-actualization as those that must be experienced by soldiers who go to war for the countries and families they love. Of course, championing “diversity” is a totally passive act, so we now have a few generations’ worth of Westerners who think that by sitting in their living rooms and soaking up BBC, NBC, CNN, etc. propaganda, they’ve reached the height of moral achievement.
“For instance, if the U.S. did not have all the various identity-based
lobbying groups that it currently does, there would be (tens of?)
thousands of people out of jobs.”
No, that isn’t sound logic. Before the counter-culture movement of the 1960’s, America (and all Western nations) had only one “identity group”. “American” in America, “British” in Great Britian… You get the gist. And unemployment was pretty near nil, at least during certain periods.
If we smashed the identity-based lobbying groups TODAY, yes, some people (vermin) would be out of work.
What I’m saying is that *those* lobbying jobs wouldn’t exist.
Naturally, those people would almost certainly enter more productive (from America’s perspective) employment.
It’s almost as if the only solution to this problem is that we need to kick them the fuck out of our countries. Lightbulb!!
Occam’s Razor