As I said on Twitter, the major divide of the 21st century is nationalists vs. globalists. It isn’t nationalists vs. nationalists anymore. We’re fighting for the survival of our entire civilization. We’ve learned from past mistakes and moved on from litigating old quarrels:
“History is a whore of politics,” Björn Höcke, one of the party’s most radical politicians, said in an interview. “A great people like the German people, which lost two world wars in one century, no longer has a historical narrative of its own.”
In an ornate Dresden ballroom in January, local AfD candidate Jens Maier told the crowd that what he called Western Allies’ re-education efforts after World War II led to Germans being convinced “we are bastards, criminals, that we are worth nothing.”
As his voice rose, Mr. Maier hollered into his microphone, to applause: “I hereby declare this cult of guilt to be over! To be over, once and for all!”
To a political establishment for which Holocaust remembrance is an integral part of public life, the AfD’s break with the consensus is a shocking turn. …
The AfD is the most successful party to have arisen to the right of Germany’s mainstream conservative bloc, which Ms. Merkel now leads, since World War II. For decades, far-right parties failed to gain a foothold in Germany. Leading conservative politicians made it their stated mission to prevent the rise of nationalist movements. …”
Sweden remained neutral during the Second World War.
It is the same struggle there though. I’m told Sweden is a country overrun by McDonald’s and Third World refugees. Does that sound familiar? In the 21st century, Swedes live under the same Iron Curtain of political correctness, multiculturalism and mass immigration as the British, the Germans and the Americans. Do you know who really lost the World Wars? It was all of us.
The White race was the loser of the 20th century. We started the 20th century as the rulers of the planet and ended it under siege in our own homelands. Everyone who was unborn at the time was the loser of those disastrous wars. Liberalism was the victor. Globalism was the victor. Non-Whites were the victor. That’s who has been empowered over us everywhere you look.
Think about it: whether it is Australia, Canada, Ireland, Sweden, Spain or Greece, we’re all being dispossessed in our homelands by the same class of people who represent the same system. Why are the Swedes so self-hating? What did they do to deserve this? They didn’t even participate in the Second World War. They didn’t have large overseas colonies.
Note: “Conservative” parties everywhere exist to defend the liberal status quo. Angela Merkel is a “conservative.” ¡Jeb! is a conservative.
Note: In light of their staggering losses, I’m not sure I would call Jews the victor of the Second World War, but the creation of Israel was a result of that conflict. They certainly emerged from the war far more powerful and influential in the West than they had been before it.
It s so defeating. iui with clomid
cialis dosage This medical remedy is an analog of two drugs Cialis and Priligy , so Cialis with Dapoxetine is beneficial to purchase, save money and get an expected result
viagra and cialis online Pagamento elettronico
Interesting article; I can’t wait to see come September if Merkel has a seat to sit in. Freedom of speech over in Germany is bias, but it doesn’t stop Frauke Petry. I would enjoy seeing a branch of the Alt-right over in Germany knowing how influential they can be. Yes, they do have the identitarian movement however they are closely observed which has me thinking they’re more of an underground movement. Perhaps a new campaign is in order to bring women back into the home so self identifying white families can grow in numbers! Natural born German birth rates are down in Germany.
“In light of their staggering losses, I’m not sure I would call Jews the victor of the Second World War, but the creation of Israel was a result of that conflict.”
What losses are you referring to?
There is so much denial in Sweden. Why? Because the power of taboo.
Diversity is no longer an idea or even an ideal. It is holy icon. An idol to be worshiped.
When people say ‘diversity is our strength’, it is not a suggestion or conjecture. It is a mantra, an article of faith. Also, any notion of ‘white identity’ is deemed quasi-satanic; therefore, whites are worse if they are among whites preserving whiteness, and whites are better if they are among non-whites and becoming less white.
This is an article of faith, a neo-religion.
So, all this diversity is supposed to make Sweden better. But it’s not.
Now, occam’s razor would say it is because the migrants, Africans and Muslims, are problematic; they are different, don’t respect Sweden, have incompatible cultural values, and have different genetics. Also, they come from Mean Cultures that don’t see niceness as virtue but as weakness to bully and exploit. So, the more the Swedes act ‘nice’, the more Africans and Muslims act un-nice. It’s like a woman acting nice to an abusive man will be beaten more.
Also, they come from cultures where men are still men. So, when they see Swedish men being servile to Swedish women, they feel contempt. They see white ‘cucks’. Also, they don’t like to be told what to do or think by women, especially white women who either dress like whores or function as sexless bureaucrats. So, they commit sex crimes against the ‘bitches’.
But then, due to cult of ‘white guilt’ and ‘white atonement’, even white feminists do little about non-white violence and crime(even against women), and such spinelessness makes the Africans and Muslims even more dismissive of white culture and power.
None of this can be discussed honestly because it would expose truths about differences among races, cultures, and sexes. Sweden has done most to castrate its men but has also done most to bring in masculine men who despise castrated men. And they hate soulless female commissars who, btw, do most to castrate white men and do most to excuse virility of non-white men.
Meanwhile, since Diversity is Holy, the non-white mobs and thugs are never blamed for anything. (There is also the element of pride and saving face. Swedish elites have branded themselves as mavens of the humanitarian super-power. They love to pat themselves on the back and show off to the whole world how caring and wonderful they are — even though no one around the world cares about them. So, the elites are loathe to admit that they’ve been just insufferable holier-than-thou pompous asses. ‘White guilt’ is inextricably tied with ‘white pride’ of ‘good whites’ who atone and hug the world. They don’t want to lose face and desperately carry on with the charade via control of media and education.)
Imagine a room and some thug inside it. Suppose the room is nice, but it get worse and worse because the thug is messing things up and acting wild. But the mantra is ‘thuggery in our strength’. So, day after day, the thug messes up the room more, BUT no one can blame the thug since the mantra says thuggery is holy. So, what is to be blamed for the mess? Maybe it’s the bed. Or bed sheets. Maybe it’s the light bulb. Maybe it’s the desk. Maybe it’s the chair. Look, the TV is busted. Maybe the TV attacked the thug and got busted. The chair is broken. Maybe the chair attacked the thug, and thug reacted in defense and fought back. Maybe the window needs to be replaced. Maybe it’s the painting on the wall. Maybe a new coat of paint will do the trick. Meanwhile, it’s never the thug-in-the-room, of course. After all, thuggery is our strength, thuggery is our strength, thuggery is our strength. If there may be something wrong with the thug, it must be due to the environment. Yeah, the room isn’t nice enough for him. That is why he flies off the handle sometimes. The room doesn’t have the latest computer and video game for him. It doesn’t have his favorite beer in the fridge.
It’s like American theory of education and blacks. Why are black students messing up so much? It can never be the fault of students or their parents. No, it must everything and everyone BUT them.
In a dictatorship, the tyrant causes the biggest problems but gets the least blame because it is taboo to speak honestly about the tyrannical abuse of power.
Democracies are free and don’t have dictators. So, how come Sweden turned out this way? Why is it a kind of tyranny?
Because ideas can gain dictatorial power. It’s like a cult. While the cult leader is alive, he is the dictator. But even after he dies and when cultists are no longer under his thumb, they are still mentally controlled by the Cult. Sweden has i-dictatorship or idea-dictatorship.
I-dictator of the West is the mantra ‘diversity is our strength’. Even free people can become unfree in the mind, chained to an idea than being free and rationale to ponder it for acceptance or rejection. An imprisoned mind is under lock and key of the Taboo.
The mind must be freed from taboos before anything is possible.
Of course, unfree minds in a free society will eventually turn society unfree as well.
If people in a free society believe that opposing views should be shut down because such is ‘hateful’, they will push for laws that penalize freedom of speech. When there are ENOUGH Of such people as voters, legislators, and judges, a once free society will become unfree and tyrannical. Not because some tyrant took over but because ideas turned people away from freedom and truth.
The Jews certainly did win WW2 regardless of where. During the early time of the Nazis tons of Jews emigrated to the US & UK. And not just average working class ones – but the extreme radical ones moved. The ones that were not allowed to come in that the media is continually whining about happened much later after the war started.
For example, the Roosevelt administration was full of Jews. The Morgenthau plan and many other plans about to what do about Germany were authored by Jews. There were many, many Jews inside both the early CIA and MI5. The Jews helped to plan what was going to be done to Germany after the war and many of those same plans were also used in western countries.
After WW2 was over the allies put these ex-German Jews in charge of radio, print, academia and many other things. People will shriek that its antisemitic but its a fact. Anyone can look it up. As a result Germany and most western countries have had 70 years of white guilt, multiculturalism and diversity rammed down their throats.
Germany didn’t start two wars by itself.
There were a lot of pig headed bast**ds on the allies’ side too https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/2c04b4ce9da70d49d0a17f54375d24240f0289633ed605a98adef7f54cff02ec.jpg .
If you read up on the lead up to WWII Germany was virtually forced into the fight.
Right now there are politico’s in the USA and Europe wanting a war with Russia.
They should be shot for being stupid.
Why don’t we just say no to war this time?
I wouldn’t say Jews won WW2. But Jews – the US Jewish elites – were definitely the victors in the Cold War. Actual Jewish dominance, in the sense of totalitarian control, only really dates from around 1992 and the start of the Bill Clinton era. It’s also when Political Correctness became dominant, Holocaust ceased to be a generic term (or refer to nuclear war), free speech was abandoned as an ideal by the establishment, etc.
THIS is how you move the overton window. I don’t see her Seig Heiling up there.
Axis powers? Evil Nazis / facists. Except Japan, because the evil White man nuked them.
Allied powers? Slightly less evil than Nazis, but still evil because you oppress Black people by merely existing.
Died in WW2? Completely non-important, unless you’re Jewish.
I can’t imagine why I’ve been a “Holocaust denier” since I learned how to read.
I wouldn’t call roughly 300K deaths a staggering loss to the Jews when you compare it to literally everyone else who fought in WW2. They lost very little compared to what they’ve gained since 1940 in terms of population, international influence, military power, and territory. White man on the other hand lost millions upons millions, and is now faced with the very real threat of complete extinction and the collapse of every last White country within the next 150 years of now as a direct consequence. imo.