Culture

High-Skilled Immigration and Imminent Cries of Discrimination

…thanks to decades of mass unfiltered immigration from the third world. Because then there won’t even be an America left for immigrants to assimilate to. It will have become the perfect, soulless, late stage capitalist corporation, where you get an email every two weeks reminding you that your company culture exists, which consists of a logo, a slogan, and pictures of happy, diverse people sitting around computers or tables. Is that the world you want to live in?

President Donald Trump’s address to Congress featured a very, foreign shall we say, approach to immigration reform. The idea that the United States should focus on high-skilled immigration and explicitly reduce low-skilled immigration is not something popular with the manager class of the United States. Since the national origins quotas were ended in the 1960s, immigration to the United States has not been a program of demographic balancing but of social justice and virtue signaling. No matter how alien, how dependent, or how unemployable, everyone around the world was invited to fulfill Emma Lazarus’s poem on the pedestal of Lady Liberty, to create Israel Zangwill’s melting pot. Family unification (as if we are responsible for immigrants leaving their families behind) or diversity lottery visa programs (yes, actually a real thing) were America’s immigration goals, not Australian- or Canadian-style points systems.

But the latter sound increasingly plausible if this is what Trump’s speechwriters are feeding him:

Protecting our workers also means reforming our system of legal immigration. The current, outdated system depresses wages for our poorest workers, and puts great pressure on taxpayers. Nations around the world, like Canada, Australia and many others — have a merit-based immigration system. It is a basic principle that those seeking to enter a country ought to be able to support themselves financially. Yet, in America, we do not enforce this rule, straining the very public resources that our poorest citizens rely upon. According to the National Academy of Sciences, our current immigration system costs America’s taxpayers many billions of dollars a year. Switching away from this current system of lower-skilled immigration, and instead adopting a merit-based system, will have many benefits: it will save countless dollars, raise workers’ wages, and help struggling families — including immigrant families — enter the middle class. I believe that real and positive immigration reform is possible, as long as we focus on the following goals: to improve jobs and wages for Americans, to strengthen our nation’s security, and to restore respect for our laws.

In other words, Trump’s immigration policies are less of a social experiment in how much ethnic fracturing and wanton despoiling of our accumulated wealth is sustainable and more of what the Democrats are going to call “discrimination against Hispanic and Latino communities.” We all know high-skilled immigration means White people!

Now as an evil racist Trump supporter who knows a thing or two about these things,  allow me to clarify:

First of all, all immigration policies involve discrimination. It’s a lot like dating. There’s a reason you turn down one person for someone else (or no one), often multiple reasons. And as in love, you are going to have to live with these people for a long time if you say yes. By choosing who to date or marry, you chose who not to date or marry. By choosing who is allowed to immigrate, you are choosing who is not allowed to immigrate. Of course, you could just allow anyone to enter at will without restriction, but that would imply your government is no longer sovereign over its territory. Such an open policy means you essentially have no freedom to choose and are at the mercy of the choices of others (who do not have your best interests in mind, only theirs). You must consent; you are not allowed to discriminate. The implications are unsettling if applied to other spheres of interpersonal life, so why is immigration—the peopling of your community—treated any differently? Someone has to win and someone has to lose. The losers this time are Mayan peasants and Arab medievalists.

Second, we have no obligation to admit people simply because they want to be admitted. Suppose I wanted to visit France as a tourist but could not afford to go. You’d tell me to save my money so I could make the trip someday, or go to EPCOT. Now, suppose I wanted to move to France with no means of affording it, and stay there permanently. You’d laugh. But that’s pretty much the current immigration policy of the United States. Now of course, we don’t let everyone in who wants to come, and we don’t catch everyone who comes in illegally. And not every immigrant is on welfare, no, but immigrant-headed households receive public welfare at a higher rate than native-headed ones (especially if non-Whites are disaggregated). But this notion that foreigners, let alone destitute foreigners, somehow have a right to access the United States and receive cash transfers from us simply because they want to, and that suggesting this should not be so makes you morally repugnant, is absurd. If the United States is a sovereign country, it does not have to open its gates to everyone who walks up to them, and it certainly does not have to donate its public resources to people who are not part of our commons.

Third, high-skilled immigration is merit-based, not race-based. Cry racism against Hispanics and Latinos all you want, it’s not our fault that most high-skilled immigration comes from elsewhere. And speaking of elsewhere, it’s not all going to come from Europe either, not by a long-shot. This is not a “White supremacist” policy. This is in fact the opposite; it is a policy where anyone can be qualified. Most of the immigrants this policy would net are in all likelihood going to be East Asian or Indian, which should make for interesting debates about racism given that Asians are the census-defined racial group with the highest median household income per capita in the United States. In simple English, Mr. Chang makes more money than Mr. Smith, because his skills pay more. Racism is privilege plus power right? Now, you’re probably going to say one of two things, that Asians [the highest earning group] are people of color and therefore not racist [or powerful], or that immigration restrictions are based on racism, maybe both.

The sharper leftists will then pivot and say that there is a paternal, model-minority sort of racism to willing to accept high-earning Asian immigrants but not poorer (and darker-skinned) Hispanic/Latino, Middle Eastern, and African migrants. But if we wheel back to points one and two, we see that we should be allowed to as a country pick and choose who we want to let in. The Constitution and our laws do not apply to people who aren’t even inside the United States yet. And since the requirements of a merit-system are not race-based, crying racism is futile.

But you know what, maybe they are on to something. Saying this group of totally alien outsiders are okay because they have money and this other group who are equally foreign are not acceptable is a little crude. Maybe we should focus on countries which are the least foreign in terms of culture, language, heritage, society, and economic development relative to the United States and then pick from their populations who we let in. If race is as important as we are told it is in America, maybe we should listen. I mean, wouldn’t it just be terrible if all those high-performing Asian immigrants had to experience racism from the under-performing White natives? Is that the society you want to live in? Race- and ethnicity-based immigration policies might actually give us better results, because the people selected would have the least difficultly fitting in, and more importantly we would not be basing our criteria on something as cold and mercenary as “Do you provide economic value to our country?” We’d have to truly ask “Can you belong here?”

This has been done before. When people say immigration restriction is un-American or spout other anti-native nonsense, they are ignoring the Northern European character of most immigration from 1600-1890, and the explicitly pro-Northern European immigration quotas enacted from 1921 to 1965. If anything, restriction is an American tradition, not open borders. What Trump proposes then, is in fact rather milquetoast. He wants to tighten up the requirements for sure, but very little thought seems to be given beyond economic concerns regarding labor and internal job competition and wages. These are important issues to be sure, and they are the issues that win elections. But they are not the issues that make or break nations. Those issues are going to become increasingly unavoidable as the country tilts towards becoming “minority-majority” thanks to decades of mass unfiltered immigration from the third world. Because then there won’t even be an America left for immigrants to assimilate to. It will have become the perfect, soulless, late stage capitalist corporation, where you get an email every two weeks reminding you that your company culture exists, which consists of a logo, a slogan, and pictures of happy, diverse people sitting around computers or tables. Is that the world you want to live in?

  • Merick Kaner

    Trump: “Nick Adams new book, Green Card Warrior, is a must read. The merit-based system is the way to go. Canada, Australia!” So it seems Labor Mobility will be the next shoe to drop in the free market saga. Trump will be a one term President.

  • Fred

    Some would argue that the merit-based system is a step in the right direction. Some may say it would attract White South Africans or Eastern Europeans. It might.

    I argue that we would have Chinatowns and New Bangalores in a every small town USA right next to the hood and Mexicoland. Eventually, we will have to divide this country not in three pieces but in five or six.

    Furthermore, the requirements will be dropped for Sub-Saharan Africans, as it SHOULD be in the way of affirmative act, and we will have more Nigerians, Somalis and Zulus in this country.

  • Fred

    Plus, I do not believe Trump on this occasion. I believe he wants to sell us amnesty under the auspicious of the grand immigration reform.

    If you can’t stop immigration, you can’t get it proportionally to today’s ethnic composition of the country, leave it as it is. Just enforce the current law.

  • eyeslevel

    Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians, white countries for EVERYBODY!? Everyone gets a homeland but white people? Nothing fair about that. White people are the ones being discriminated against.

  • MylesStandish

    Yes, we need a lot more “high skilled” immigration from Asia, that’s how we can make America Great Again. Poor Kushner’s only made ~$50 million from the U.S. EB 5 visa program which doles out green cards to wealthy gooks in exchange for them buying real estate. If we consider inflation and the rising cost of bagels, it’s pretty clear that the current program is anti-semitic. Now we have a chance to funnel more money to the Kushners and bring in more of these precious “high-skilled” mongols. Thank you Trump!

  • uiterstrechts

    The grounds for indiscriminate third world immigration are crumbling. High IQ nationalism will be the next outpost for Jewish subversion. It has a smooth track record of destroying white spaces. (Have you ever heard about any recent race riots in Vancouver?)

    • They already have that ground pretty well covered actually. HBD, AmRen’s “Northern Alliance,” “Neo-Reaction.” In fact all that was going swimmingly except White Nationalism got a new life as “Alt Right” and they just couldn’t shut up people discussing the Jewish Problem.

  • VictoryOrValhalla

    Race doesn’t exist, but racism, that’s a real, super huge problem. By being a racist, you are someone who is afraid of an abstract concept that doesn’t actually exist. So how can border restrictions and immigration qualifications be racist?
    Dumb as fuck leftists.
    We need to freeze virtually all immigration, then cut “social welfare” aka parasites completely. Importing “highly skilled” Indian doctors and programmers is just as toxic as importing degenerate knuckle-dragging darkies. People like me that want to get into fields saturated and raped by “highly skilled” Indians while living in a cesspool of Blacks and Muslims don’t exactly have much hope in life if we don’t get major cuts to diversity and immigration.

    • internetjw

      My local Indian doctor’s clinic is run entirely by family members, none of whom speak English worth a damn, and everybody knows that their clinic is crooked and double dips. Highly skilled my ass.

  • Y Finkelstein

    Do we really want to be swamped by Asian or Indian computer nerds?

    You always hear about the critical shortage in the STEM fields. Well why the hell should we encourage kids to get STEM degrees if cheap immigrant labor is going to arrive to steal their jobs under this “Merit based immigration system”?

    How about ZERO net immigration for a long period of time.

    • Lucy Lipinska

      Absolutely, Y Finkelstein. Even though mass influx of unskilled (primitive) people does overshadow other concerns, turning the blind eye to the fact that replacement of Whites with Asians – just because the latter got educated – is far from healthy to our White civilization. Is see it as a more insidious way to make our societies “multicultural”, i.e. non-White.

    • ali reza

      I agree. Trump is a tool of the super rich. He has come to channel the anger of the people away from the oligarchy and maintain their hold on power. His immigration policy is what they wanted and could not get.

  • listenupbub

    I kind of like Mexicans, because they are the most likely of all minorities to vote Republican. Being Christian allows them to be humble enough to become loyal to their country, despite this country hating them so much.

    I’d rather kick out the infinity Asians in our universities.

    • ThomasER916

      “I kind of like Mexicans, because they are the most likely of all minorities to vote Republican.”

      Then move to Mexico, because Mexicans are a net loss of our country just like they are in Mexico. In fact, if there were no Mexicans America would be richer, safer, and more Republican.

  • Robert Bruce

    It doesn’t mean white people when you talk of highly skilled workers, it means Asians most likely. Quit trying to sugar coat Trump, he is a massive fraud. The Alt Right needs to keep his feet to the fire, just as if Hilary won. He said he was going to drain the Swamp, but just filled it again with the same types that W and Barak had in there. He throws you some bones and you are all so fawning over this guy. This guy is still a big ? and you think you know what he is doing, when in reality you are just speculating. Nothing has changed, but since he sends out mixed signals to everyone and anyone nobody can pin him down, or more to the point wants to. The Alt Right is joined at the hip with this guy and now their very survival depends on this guy. Bad Move!!!!!! He is a one term president and if the next economic disaster does come around, he will be blamed for it. That is why in other threads I said it was time for the alt right to get a program created and create a political party to actually run candidates in the near future.

    • Lucy Lipinska

      When looking at the the crew he surrounded himself with, I think you’re right, Robert. Many people are now so desperate that they do not want to see that the swamp is not being drained.

    • Irving

      the reality is that this isn’t going to lead to any white immigration, it might conceivably even reduce what white immigration there is. europeans are (on average) skilled, but this isn’t the only thing that matters. high-skill immigration basically means high-iq *young* male immigrants – and tell me, with europe’s birth rates being what they are, where are those young high-iq european male immigrants going to come from? the reality is that roughly 65% of the immigrants under the new standards will be asians, mostly east asian and indian. you’ll have some russians come in, and then some euros, increasingly so as the european economies collapse and brain drain ensues. russians and euros will account for no more than 20%. than you’ll have high skilled blacks arabs and hispanics, maybe they’ll amount to 10% altogether. the remaining proportion will be refugee types for whom the rules are bended.

  • craicher

    I happen to live in China. I can tell you that the Chinese are a pretty nice, family oriented people. That being said, they are following their biological emperative to expand and conquer new territory. Allowing them to conquer our lands is suicide in the long run. Allowing them to undercut our wages is suicide in the short term. And because their women are submissive and feminine a process of race mixing will inevitably begin, particularly with white men who have little success with white women or men who are sick of what white western women have become. But like all non-whites they will still maintain their own separate pure racial community. The mixed genes will flow into the white community.

    Another thing. The Chinese are filthy dirty. I mean filthy. They are also sloppy. They do everything half ass. And you cannot trust that an educated Chinese is really educated. No one fails in a Chinese university. I know. I work in one.

    • Y Finkelstein

      Your post lends credence to the theory that the Chinese, while intelligent, are really not that much smarter than Whites. They just engage in massive cheating and studying to pass the test. This is not surprising, for it is ingrained in their culture going back thousands of years with the Confucian civil service exams. A wellborn Celestial hoped to become a Civil Servant in Imperial China and and studied hard to pass the exams.

      • craicher

        Yep, rote memorization to pass the test. They can recite Hamlet backwards but it’s all of course meaningless. Being smart is not very useful if you don’t also have a creative spark and will. Being able to memorize things may make you a good automaton though. If I could have a society of slaves I would choose the Chinese.

      • ThomasER916

        “ingrained in their culture”

        Culture is a racial construct.

    • Lucy Lipinska

      I couldn’t agree more. And I especially dislike their treatment of animals, in this regard the Chinese are no better than folks from MENA. No room for barbaric treatment of sentient creatures in a truly civilized society, if you ask me and other Whites with self-respect.

      • craicher

        I like them. But they look like mutants and don’t give a damn about this planet.

      • craicher

        btw, I used to live in Poland and I also speak Swedish.

  • SLCain

    “First of all, all immigration policies involve discrimination. It’s a
    lot like dating………..Such an open policy means you
    essentially have no freedom to choose and are at the mercy of the
    choices of others (who do not have your best interests in mind, only
    theirs). You must consent; you are not allowed to discriminate. The
    implications are unsettling if applied to other spheres of interpersonal
    life, so why is immigration—the peopling of your community—treated any
    differently?”

    Open borders IS rape-culture.

  • SLCain

    “……where you get an email every two weeks reminding you that your company culture exists, which consists of a logo, a slogan, and pictures of happy, diverse people sitting around computers or tables. Is that the world you want to live in?”

    That is indeed the essence of most large organizations in contemporary America. Fake tableaux of smiling diverse people sitting around a glass-table in a gleaming modernist office, pointing at a power-point chart. White men, if they are there at all, are few, or in the back and slightly blurred. Corporate diversity officers (i.e., parasites) think that this is the way that real work gets done. In fact, it is nothing but a Kabuki-play – an artificial and stilted show of real work.

  • Aedra Daedra
  • Gubbler Chechenova

    So, Charles Murray got shout off the stage because he’s ‘nazi’ or ‘fascist’ or something. And a woman was attacked and ended up in a neck brace.

    All this ‘nazi’ and ‘fascist’ talk is so tiresome.

    I am the only true fascist, and it’s getting so stupid for every side to accuse the other side of being ‘fascist’.

    The fact is WE ARE ALL FASCISTS, but since I’m the only one who is honest about it, I’m the only true fascist.

    There are many different meanings to fascism.

    But as it is used today, it means the ‘gangsterism of power’. So, it is a theoretics of power. So, when someone says “You’re fascist”, it means “You’re Machiavellian(at least in part).”

    To that, I say “NO SHI*.”

    It’s like the conversation between Michael and Kay:

    It’s like the conversation between Michael and Geary:

    If ‘fascism’ means gangsterism, machiavellianism, use of brute force, conspiracy, shadowy use of power, and being above and below the law, then WE ARE ALL FASCISTS.

    And this has been the case for all societies whether they called themselves monarchic, democratic, socialist, communist, Islamist, nationalist, globalist, anarchist, theocratic, and yes, fascist. Go down the list of what they did and they all qualify as ‘fascist’. Going by current definition of ‘fascism’, Paul Craig Roberts and Chris Hedges could agree that US is ‘fascist’. But go down the list of what any nation did, and it’d be ‘fascist’ too. It’s like Andrew Roberts calls Communism ‘red fascism’, and Susan Sontag called Soviet Union’s brand of communism ‘fascism with a human face’. But one could just as easily say the US or Israel is ‘democratic fascist’ or ‘dollar fascist’ given all the ‘dirty’ and ‘bloody’ and ‘repressive’ things they have done.

    Of course, during the Vietnam War, Sontag was more or less suggesting American system is something like Fascism with Human Rights.

    http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=25427

    http://www.nytimes.com/books/00/03/12/specials/sontag-communism.html

    Now, some nations are most trust-oriented and rule-bound than others or less ‘fascist’, but ironically, those nations tend to be founded on fascist principles that favor homogeneity, unity, and nationalism. Even though Sweden was never ideologically fascist, its demographics and culture of discipline/trust were more aligned with fascist ideals or ideals that appeal to fascists. As Sweden moves away from those conditions and becomes more diverse, it is ironically becoming more ‘fascist’ as the Swedish state & media have to use more underhanded tactics to maintain the narrative and power. And Swedish citizens have to resort to more extra-legal and secretive methods to ensure their security and well-being. Since saying the wrong thing can get them fired or even jailed, they say one thing and do another. Thus, they become more Machiavellian or ‘fascist’.

    That is the Fascist Paradox. A society that adheres to Fascist Ideals of nationalism, homogeneity, border security, and unity will be less ‘fascist’-pragmatic(or Machiavellian).

    There will be more culture of trust and Rule of Law.

    But as a society loses its Ideal Fascist Conditions and becomes more diverse and open(in the name of anti-fascism), the power becomes more ‘fascist’ in the Machiavellian sense since there is less trust, less shared values, and less adherence to Rule of Law(as various ethnic groups try to bend the law to their advantage, like Jews with saving Soviet Jews and Mexican-Americans with favoring illegal Mexicans) and with blacks pushing for black interests. So, American Politics is looking more and more like THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY. As there is less social trust, power comes only with the Game.

    Trump’s Civic Nationalism may be more fascist as an ideal, but if successful, it will make Americans less ‘fascist’ in the Machiavellian sense. It will favor more Rule of Law and National Trust. But if Nationalism is undermined in the US in the name of anti-fascism, the resulting globalist open borders and diversity will lead to more distrust and infighting among groups, which will make everything more ‘machiavellian’ or ‘fascist’. We see this in California. As the most ‘progressive’ state, it is supposed to be most Anti-fascist. But the power politics has become totally cynical, tribal, machiavellian, and ‘fascist’.

    So, we are all ‘fascists’. But no one wants to admit it. Every side, to have any power in the new messy order, resorts to dirty tricks and underhanded measures, but it always accuses the OTHER side of ‘fascism’, as if only the other side is doing it when all sides are doing it.

    It’s like all sides hate but every side accuses the other side of ‘hate’. If Victorianism was about sexual repression, today it’s about power repression. Every side that wants the power pretends it’s all about highfalutin principles while accusing the other side of naked power grab(or ‘fascism’).

    Foreign Policy is most ‘fascist’ since foreign affairs are run totally by Machiavellian methods, and this goes for all nations. While culture of trust is possible within a nation(especially homogeneous one), it’s not possible in a diverse world of many nations. Despite all the bogus stated humanitarian principles, the only rule that still matters in world affairs is ‘enemy of your enemy is your friend’, which is why there are so many nutty alliances all over the world.

    This is why I find people like Kissinger less loathsome than those like Samantha Powers and Albright. Kissinger was a gangster, and he got blood on his hands, but he knew the nature of the game he was playing. I mean you can’t be consiglieri with clean hands. He didn’t pretend to be Mr. Good Guy.

    But we now hear all this bogus talk from diplomats about ‘human rights’, and it’s all BS. They pull every dirty trick in the book in Latin America, Middle East, Europe, and Asia but act like it’s all about promoting democracy. Things were more honest during Cold War. Back then, there were few democracies outside the West, and it was US vs USSR, and both sides knew it was a dirty game. But once communism ended and democracy spread all over, ‘human rights’ can always be invoked to justify anything. So, even though US acts like a gangster, it projects all its dirtiness on someone like Putin. Yes, Putin is a KILLER and THUG. But Americans are.. what? Saints and do-gooders?

    US is especially gangsterist since its ruling elites, largely Jewish, loathe and despise so much of the gentile population who won’t put up with globalism — worldwide gangsterism of Wall Street, Pentagon, and Hollywood — anymore. Jews are very keen about the true nature of power. They invoke principles, but it’s all a card trick. The problem is we live in an amnesiac world due to PC and Pop Culture. A lot of young people who’ve been made to freak out about Russia have no idea about all the horror stories about the Red Scare that used to be part of Liberal/Leftist narrative. And today’s young Progs seem unaware of what the Free Speech movement championed in the 60s. Amnesia means no larger context, no references. The amnesiac are easy to manipulate. The guy is manipulated so easily in MEMENTO because he can’t store new info into long-term memory.

    In FAHRENHEIT 451, Montag cannot imagine a past when houses were not fireproof.

    By the current definition of ‘fascist’, which nation is NOT fascist?

    Russia is ruled by autocratic government that uses a heavy hand. It even carries out assassinations.

    China is ruled by autocratic government that will clamp down on anyone. And there are all sorts of collusion happening at all layers of society.

    Japan has essentially been a one-party state forever, and there’s been close ties among government, organized crime, and far-right extremists.

    Turkey is Erdogan’s private gangster state where law has been suspended many times even under democracy. (Secular Turkish military regimes also did ‘fascist’ things.)

    Israel is ruled by Zionist militants and sharks who will stop at nothing. They will even use terrorism against Iranian scientists.

    Cuba has been a police state under Castros.

    Latin American nations used all sorts of ‘dirty war’ tactics to suppress dissent.

    Iran is a theocratic thug state where the regime does all sorts of nasty stuff to keep the power.

    EU is has become a repressive system of mind-control and surveillance. EU officials take orders from globalist oligarch gangstesr like Soros and Rothchilds.

    Mexico? Watch THE COUNSELOR. It is a narco-gangster state with veneer of liberal democracy.

    The US is ruled by oligarchs, deep state, globo cabal that control the media. And US will use all sorts of extralegal methods to destroy people, invade nations, starve 100,000’s via sanctions, and etc.

    So, they are all ‘fascist’ . As things stand, ANY nation can accuse ANY OTHER of being ‘fascist’ since every nation bends the rules, does underhanded things, and uses violence & brutality to get what it wants regardless of international law. In the end, the power decides, not the principle or the law. UN says one thing about West Bank but does nothing about it cuz the Power is on the side of Zionists. UN says Israel is illegally occupying Golan Heights, but Israel still keeps it and nothing is done about it.

    GOOD WAR narrative says evil Germany and Japan justifiably got smashed for their war crimes, but US gets away with every war crime since end of Cold War. By GOOD WAR logic, the US should have been dresden-ed and hiroshima-ed several times over for its unprovoked wars and invasions in the Middle East.

    But the power, not the principle, decides, and that means we are living in a ‘fascist’ world.

    We are all ‘fascists’.

    But there is always the power of semantics where one can pretend one’s dirty deeds are not ‘fascist’ and applies only to the other side. It is ‘fascist’ only when the OTHER guy does it.

    Or, one’s dirty deeds are justified because they are used against the OTHER guy who is the ‘real fascist’. So, ‘fascist’ deeds against ‘fascists’ are not ‘fascist’. It’s like ‘punching nazis’ isn’t nazi-like behavior even though ‘nazism’ is defined as thuggish use of power.

    It’s like burning witches isn’t witch-like behavior since it burns witches.

    It’s about time that the world is now governed by one rule. End of History is a Gangster Paradise. We are all ‘fascists’ now, and it is time we admit it. Every side does ‘fascist’ things and justifies it in the name of fighting ‘fascism’ of the other side.

    Things were both more gangster-like and less gangster-like during The Cold War. Because the stakes were so high in the conflict between super-powers, both US and USSR pulled every dirty trick in the book for the upperhand. Result was mess in Vietnam and Afghanistan. USSR supported vile movements, the US supported vile regimes(with death squads). BUT, it was also an ideological struggle of two vision of Justice. So, the US and USSR had to make the case its own vision was more just. Those were ideological times, and people took ideas seriously. Plenty of Western intellectual were sincere Marxists, and many in the Third World emerging from imperialism tended to associate capitalism with imperialism and communism with liberation. (Also, the world was more socially conservative back then(at least by later libertine standards), so shame was a bigger aspect of human behavior. Since it was considered gauche and tasteless to act like a shameless pig, people stuck to ideals, moral values, spirituality, and idealism. But once rap culture, thug culture, and greed culture became open expressions in a shameless society of ‘girls gone wild’ and ‘greed is good’ and ‘gansta paradise’ and ‘tattoo and piercing’ and MTV-ed world, human nature was less prone to repress animal drives in favor of higher ideas or principles. Wallowing in piggery of greed, lust, and ego became the ‘highest’ principle.)

    But once the Cold War ended, communism died as an ideology. And someone like Fukuyama was optimistic, seeing the future as triumph of rule of law and liberal democracy. The problem is Rule of Law and Liberal Democracy are generic ideas and prescriptions. They are not about the Power of Ego and Ethno. In a free society, there is going to be two kinds of power: individual and tribal. Ultra-ambitious individuals will become like Gordon Gekkos, Sheldon Adelson, or Bill Gates. And some tribes will be more driven, ambitious, and talented than others. There have been new ideologies since End of Cold War but fuzzy, vague, confused, or ludicrous ones like ‘gay agenda’ or 50 gender stuff. Such fractured identity agendas don’t serve a broad movement. With homos being only 2% of the population, mass support of the ‘gay agenda’ means majority serving the minority, even tinny winny population of trannies. It just becomes a worship of homo vanity and decadence. So, the real power ends up being either individualistic(Bill Gates) or tribal(AIPAC), or both, as in the case of George Soros who is for individual power in service of some globalist cabal. Soros, though Jewish, seems to believe in a power beyond Jewishness. He is willing to sacrifice even Israel to serve the greater power of Globalist Elites. He lives in his own cloud empire world.

    Because the End of the Cold War(and so-called End of History) was supposed to have brought an end to the final global struggle of Grand Ideas, it was supposed to herald a new age whereupon the entire world could be more relaxed, more peaceful, and more cooperative.

    But the new era of globalism meant an individualistic and/or tribal scrambling for control of the world without restraint or obstacle(since there was no other great power or grand ideology to hold back The Power of America.) The most horrific results was Russia in 90s(total gangster paradise) and Middle East(hell on earth approaching World War levels of destruction). China did better because, even as it joined the globalist system, it maintained its independence and sovereignty from it. It used globalism but didn’t fall under its control. Russia that fell under its control went to hell in the 90s. It’s been wresting itself out of the system, and that gives it leeway. Because of its nuclear weapons, sizable military, and land mass, it it still one of the few nations that can defy US globalism, and as such, serves as an example. And that is why globalists hate it. Even if Russia was shut off to the world via sanctions, it has enough natural resources to survive. But if Russia were the size of Italy and had limited resources, it would have to fall in line like EU nations and Japan.

    Gangster Politics is so intense now because (1) Jewish anxiety of power (2) Jews have gone for huge stakes. If ‘fascism’ is brutal and naked struggle for power, the world is more ‘fascist’ than ever since the past grand themes are all gone. It’s really just about power of individuals and tribes. Of course, there are bottomfeeding suckers like antifa that still think its ‘ideals’ stand for something, but they are moron minions of Soros and the like.

    If Jews had gone for wealth and moderate power, things might not have gotten so heated up. But they are a very competitive and domineering people. They are addicted to the game and power like characters in David Mamet films. So, they aren’t satisfied with Enough. They must have more and more, they must have it all. But hogging the role of the Greatest Power in a world in which they are but small minorities in most nations means they are filled with anxiety, neurosis, and frustration. So, in order to keep the momentum going, they must panic the world with something of GREAT URGENCY to keep the globo-train lurching forward. We must be rushed onward and onward like the people waiting for the plane in AIRPLANE! If we were allowed to slow down and contemplate what’s going on, we might realize what’s really happening. So, it’s always New Panic followed by New Panic followed by New Panic and more Crises. IRAN AND NUKES!!! GADDAFI IS NEW HITLER!!! ASSAD IS BEAST!!! PUTIN IS HITLER!!! TRUMP IS RUSSIAN AGENT!!! HATE CRIMES!!! NAZI RAPE SQUADS IN COLLEGES!!! WHITE COPS ARE KILLING INNOCENT BLACKS!!! All the hysteria in the media makes us feel like we are in parody of a disaster movie.

  • CCRyder
  • Gubbler Chechenova

    So, Charles Murray got shout off the stage because he’s ‘nazi’ or ‘fascist’ or something. And a woman was attacked and ended up in a neck brace.

    All this ‘nazi’ and ‘fascist’ talk is so tiresome.

    I am the only true fascist, and it’s getting so stupid for every side to accuse the other side of being ‘fascist’.

    The fact is WE ARE ALL FASCISTS, but since I’m the only one who is honest about it, I’m the only true fascist.

    There are many different meanings to fascism.

    But as it is used today, it means the ‘gangsterism of power’. So, it is a theoretics of power. So, when someone says “You’re fascist”, it means “You’re Machiavellian(at least in part).”

    To that, I say “NO SHI*.”

    It’s like the conversation between Michael and Kay:

    It’s like the conversation between Michael and Geary:

    If ‘fascism’ means gangsterism, machiavellianism, use of brute force, conspiracy, shadowy use of power, and being above and below the law, then WE ARE ALL FASCISTS.

    And this has been the case for all societies whether they called themselves monarchic, democratic, socialist, communist, Islamist, nationalist, globalist, anarchist, theocratic, and yes, fascist. Go down the list of what they did, and they all qualify as ‘fascist’. Going by current definition of ‘fascism’, Paul Craig Roberts and Chris Hedges could agree that US is ‘fascist’. But then, go down the list of what any nation did, and it’d be ‘fascist’ too. It’s like Andrew Roberts calls Communism ‘red fascism’, and Susan Sontag called Soviet Union’s brand of communism ‘fascism with a human face’. But one could just as easily say the US or Israel is ‘democratic fascist’ or ‘dollar fascist’ given all the ‘dirty’ and ‘bloody’ and ‘repressive’ things they have done.

    Of course, during the Vietnam War, Sontag was more or less suggesting American system is something like ‘Fascism with Human Rights’.

    http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=25427

    http://www.nytimes.com/books/00/03/12/specials/sontag-communism.html

    Now, some nations are most trust-oriented and rule-bound(or less ‘fascist’) than others, but ironically, those nations tend to be founded on fascist principles that favor homogeneity, unity, and nationalism. Even though Sweden was never ideologically fascist, its demographics and culture of discipline/trust were more aligned with fascist ideals, or ideals that appeal to fascists. As Sweden moves away from those conditions and becomes more diverse, it is ironically becoming more ‘fascist’ as the Swedish state & media must resort to more underhanded tactics to maintain the narrative and power. And Swedish citizens have to turn to more extra-legal and secretive methods to ensure their security and well-being amidst rising social problems. Since saying the wrong thing can get them fired or even jailed, they say one thing and do another. Thus, they become more Machiavellian or ‘fascist’. It’s like American Liberals SAY one thing but DO another. They talk of tolerance and trust among all groups BUT in practice they push ‘fascist’ tactics such as ‘stop and frisk’ and mass incarceration of stronger-and-more-aggressive blacks to keep themselves safe.

    That is the Fascist Paradox. A society that adheres to Fascist Ideals of nationalism, homogeneity, border security, and unity will be less ‘fascist’ or Machiavellian in pragmatic day-to-day dealings.

    There will be more culture of trust and Rule of Law.

    But as a society loses its Ideal Fascist Conditions and becomes more diverse and open(in the name of anti-fascism), the power becomes more ‘fascist’ in the Machiavellian sense since there is less trust, less shared values, and less adherence to Rule of Law(as various ethnic groups try to bend the law to their advantage, like Jews with saving Soviet Jews and Mexican-Americans with favoring illegal Mexicans) and with blacks pushing for black interests. So, American Politics is looking more and more like THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY. As there is less social trust, power comes only with the Game.

    Look at Japan. It is mostly Japanese, so there is social cohesion, more culture of trust, and a rule-bound society. But suppose Japanese ‘progressives’ denounce Japanese homogeneity as ‘fascist’ and ‘racist’ and invite in tons of non-Japanese. This will lead to more diversity, more distrust, more tensions, more crime. There will be less social trust and less confidence in Rule of Law since non-Japanese minorities will demand that the Law be bent to favor them. Also, since Japanese are a small people, they will likely be easy targets of bigger and stronger foreigners(especially black ones). So, Japanese will have to look for more desperate ways to seek safety, security, and comfort. Society will become more Machiavellian, more gangster-like, more ‘fascist’.

    Trump’s Civic Nationalism may be more fascist as an ideal, but if successful, it will make Americans less ‘fascist’ in the Machiavellian gangsterish sense. It will boost increased Rule of Law and National Trust.

    But if Nationalism is continually undermined in the US in the name of anti-fascism, the resulting globalist open borders and diversity will lead to more distrust and infighting among groups, which will make everything more ‘machiavellian’ or ‘fascist’. We see this in California. As the most ‘progressive’ state, it is supposed to be most Anti-fascist. But the power politics has become totally cynical, tribal, machiavellian, and ‘fascist’. Gangsterism increasingly determines more and more of real power in California. Even environmentalism is a form of gangsterism used by the rich to prevent development to keep the prime lands to themselves. If the rich want to keep their private properties with great scenery, what better way than to invoke environmentalism to keep Eden to themselves?

    So, we are all ‘fascists’. But no one wants to admit it. Every side, to have any power in the new messy order, resorts to dirty tricks and underhanded measures, but it always accuses the OTHER side of ‘fascism’, as if only the other side is doing it when all sides are doing it.

    It’s like all sides hate but every side accuses the other side of ‘hate’. If Victorianism was about sexual repression, today it’s about power repression. Every side that wants the power pretends it’s all about highfalutin principles while accusing the other side of naked power grab(or ‘fascism’).

    Foreign Policy is most ‘fascist’ since world affairs are run totally by Machiavellian methods, and this goes for all nations. While culture of trust is possible within a nation(especially homogeneous one), it’s not possible in a diverse world of many nations. Despite all the bogus stated humanitarian principles, the only rule that still matters in world affairs is ‘enemy of your enemy is your friend’, which is why there are so many nutty alliances all over the world.

    This is why I find people like Kissinger less loathsome than those like Samantha Powers and Albright. Kissinger was a gangster, and he got blood on his hands, but he knew the nature of the game he was playing. I mean you can’t be consiglieri with clean hands. He didn’t pretend to be Mr. Good Guy.

    But we now hear all this bogus talk from diplomats about ‘human rights’, and it’s all BS. They pull every dirty trick in the book in Latin America, Middle East, Europe, and Asia but act like it’s all about promoting democracy. In some ways, things were more honest during Cold War. Back then, there were few democracies outside the West, and it was US vs USSR, and both sides knew it was a dirty game. It was often about us vs them. But once communism ended and democracy spread around the world, ‘human rights’ is often invoked to justify whatever new power-grab is cooked up by the globalist masters of the US. But then, even though US acts like a gangster, it projects all its dirtiness on someone like Putin. So, Putin is a KILLER and THUG. Accusing him of being such is supposed to mean American Elites are so clean. Putin is forced into the role of the great Evil Fascist Other at odds with the glorious radiance of globalism embodied by George Soros and Jewish globalist oligarchs who rule America and EU.

    US is especially gangsterist since its ruling elites, largely Jewish, loathe and despise so much of the gentile population who are tired of globalism — worldwide gangsterism of Wall Street, Pentagon, and Hollywood. Jews are very keen about the true nature of power. They invoke principles, but it’s all a card trick. The problem is we live in an amnesiac world due to PC and Pop Culture. A lot of flaky young people who’ve been made to freak out about Russia have no memory of the Red Scare tactics that were once denounced by the Liberal/Leftist narrative. Today, it’s the Progs who are frothing at the mouth about the RUSSIAN threat even though Russia is just a shell of its Soviet Empire days. (It was FDR who allowed tons of Soviet agents, like Alger Hiss and Harry Dexter White, into the US government. When Conservatives called out on this, Liberals denounced them as ‘red-baiters’. Today, there is zero evidence of Russian infiltration into US political system, but the Progs are totally batshit crazy. They have no principles, no logic. They are just addicted to power and will tell any lies and spread any propaganda to get it. They are ‘fascist’ in that they resort to gangster tactics and paranoia.) And today’s young Progs seem unaware of what the Free Speech movement championed in the 60s. Amnesia means having no larger context, no references. The amnesiacs are easy to manipulate. The character is manipulated so easily in Chris Nolan’s MEMENTO because he can’t store new info into long-term memory. In FAHRENHEIT 451, Montag cannot imagine a past when houses were not fireproof.

    By the current definition of ‘fascist’, which nation is NOT fascist?

    Russia is ruled by autocratic government that uses a heavy hand. It even carries out assassinations.

    China is ruled by autocratic government that will clamp down on anyone. And there are all sorts of collusion happening at all layers of society.

    Japan has essentially been a one-party state forever, and there’s been close ties among government, organized crime, and far-right extremists.

    Turkey is Erdogan’s private gangster state where law has been suspended many times even under democracy. (Secular Turkish military regimes also did ‘fascist’ things.)

    Israel is ruled by Zionist militants and sharks who will stop at nothing. They will even use terrorism against Iranian scientists.

    Cuba has been a police state under Castros. It’s been very repressive and brutal.

    Latin American nations used all sorts of ‘dirty war’ tactics to suppress dissent.

    Iran is a theocratic thug state where the regime does all sorts of nasty stuff to keep the power.

    EU is has become a repressive system of mind-control and surveillance. EU officials take orders from globalist oligarch gangstesr like Soros and Rothchilds.

    Mexico? Watch THE COUNSELOR. It is a narco-gangster state with veneer of liberal democracy.

    The US is ruled by oligarchs, deep state, globo-cabal that control the media. And US will use all sorts of extralegal methods to destroy people, invade nations, starve 100,000’s via sanctions, and etc.

    So, they are all ‘fascist’ . As things stand, ANY nation can accuse ANY OTHER of being ‘fascist’ since every nation bends the rules, does underhanded things, and uses violence & brutality to get what it wants regardless of international law. In the end, the power decides, not the principle or the law. UN says one thing about West Bank but does nothing about it cuz the Power is on the side of Zionists. UN says Israel is illegally occupying Golan Heights, but Israel still keeps it and nothing is done about it.

    GOOD WAR narrative says evil Germany and Japan justifiably got smashed for their war crimes, but US got away with every war crime since end of Cold War. By GOOD WAR logic, the US should have been dresden-ed and hiroshima-ed several times over for its unprovoked wars and invasions in the Middle East.

    But the power, not the principle, decides, and that means we are living in a ‘fascist’ world.

    We are all ‘fascists’.

    But there is always the power of semantics where one can pretend one’s dirty deeds are not ‘fascist’ and applies only to the other side. It is ‘fascist’ only when the OTHER guy does it.

    Or, one’s dirty deeds are supposedly justified because they are used against the OTHER guy who is the ‘real fascist’. So, ‘fascist’ deeds against ‘fascists’ are not ‘fascist’. It’s like ‘punching nazis’ isn’t nazi-like behavior even though ‘nazism’ is defined as thuggish use of power. It’s like burning witches isn’t witch-like behavior since it burns witches.

    It’s about time we admit that the world is now governed by one and only rule. End of History is a Gangster Paradise. We are all ‘fascists’ now, and it is time we admit it. Every side does ‘fascist’ things and justifies it in the name of fighting ‘fascism’ of the other side.

    Things were both more gangster-like and less gangster-like during The Cold War. Because the stakes were so high in the conflict between super-powers, both US and USSR pulled every dirty trick in the book to gain the upperhand. Result was mess in Vietnam and Afghanistan. USSR supported vile movements, the US supported vile regimes(with death squads).

    On the other hand, it was also an ideological struggle of two vision of Justice. So, the US and USSR had to make the case its own vision was more just. Those were ideological times, and people took ideas seriously. Plenty of Western intellectual were sincere Marxists, and many in the Third World emerging from imperialism tended to associate capitalism with imperialism and communism with liberation. (Also, the world was more socially conservative back then[at least by later libertine standards], so shame was a bigger factor in human behavior. Since it was considered gauche and tasteless to act like a shameless pig, people stuck to ideals, moral values, spirituality, and idealism, at least in public. But once rap culture, thug culture, and greed culture became open expressions in a shameless society of ‘girls gone wild’ and ‘greed is good’ and ‘gansta paradise’ and ‘tattoo and piercing’ and MTV-ed world, human nature was less prone to repress animal drives in favor of higher ideas or principles. Wallowing in piggery of greed, lust, and ego became the ‘highest’ principle with no shame attached to it. We are now supposed to celebrate and promote the vanity of an old man like Bruce Jenner who insists he be called ‘Caitlyn’.)

    But once the Cold War ended, communism died as an ideology. And someone like Francis Fukuyama was optimistic, seeing the future as triumph of rule of law and liberal democracy. The problem is Rule of Law and Liberal Democracy are generic ideas and prescriptions. They are not about the Power of Ego and Ethno.

    In a free society without restraint, there is going to be two kinds of power: individual and tribal. Ultra-ambitious individuals will become like Gordon Gekkos, Sheldon Adelson, or Bill Gates.

    And some tribes will be more driven, ambitious, and talented than others. There have been new ideologies since End of Cold War but fuzzy, vague, confused, or ludicrous ones like ‘gay agenda’ or 50 gender stuff. Such fractured identity agendas don’t serve a broad movement. With homos being only 2% of the population, mass support of the ‘gay agenda’ means majority serving the minority, even tinny winny population of trannies. It just becomes a worship of homo vanity and decadence. So, the real power ends up being either individualistic(Bill Gates) or tribal(AIPAC), or both, as in the case of George Soros who is for individual power in service of some globalist cabal. Soros, though Jewish, seems to believe in a power beyond Jewishness. He is willing to sacrifice even Israel to serve the greater power of Globalist Elites. He lives in his own cloud empire world.

    Because the End of the Cold War(and so-called End of History) supposedly brought an end to the final global struggle of Grand Ideas, it was expected to herald a new age whereupon the entire world could be more relaxed, more peaceful, and more cooperative.

    But the new era of globalism meant an individualistic and/or tribal scrambling for control of the world without restraint or obstacle(since there was no other great power or grand ideology to hold back The Power of America.) The most horrific results was Russia in 90s(total gangster paradise of Jewish oligarchs gone hog wild) and Middle East(hell on earth approaching World War levels of destruction due Wars for Israel). China did better because, even as it joined the globalist system, its independence and sovereignty were maintained. It used globalism but didn’t fall under its control. Russia fell under globalist control went to hell in the 90s. It’s been wresting itself out of the system, and that gives it leeway to maneuver for nationalist interests(than in globalist subservience). Because of its nuclear weapons, sizable military, and land mass, it is one of the few nations that can defy US globalism, and as such, serves as an hope for other nations. And that is why globalists hate Russia. Even if Russia were hit with massive sanctions, it has enough natural resources to survive. But if Russia were the size of Italy and had limited resources, it would have to fall in line like EU nations and Japan.

    Gangster Politics is so intense now because (1) Jewish anxiety of power (2) Jews have gone for huge stakes. If ‘fascism’ is brutal and naked struggle for power, the world is more ‘fascist’ than ever since the past themes of grand redemption are gone. It’s really just about power of individuals and tribes. Of course, there are bottomfeeding suckers like antifa that still think its ‘ideals’ stand for something, but they are moron minions of Soros and the like. What is the great ideological theme of today? The entire world should be made to celebrate homo decadence, homo fecal penetration, men cutting off penises and testes to get fake ‘vaginas’, and letting men with wigs use the women’s rooms. Or listening to Hollywood celebrities throw fits about Trump because he favors national interest to globalist ones.

    If Jews had gone for wealth and moderate power, things might not have gotten so heated up. But they are a very competitive and domineering people. They are addicted to the game and power like characters in David Mamet films. So, they aren’t satisfied with Enough. They must have more and more, they must have it all. But hogging the role of the Greatest Power in a world in which they are but small minorities in most nations means they are filled with anxiety, neurosis, and frustration. So, in order to keep the momentum going, they must stir up hysteria about something new of GREAT URGENCY to keep the globo-train lurching forward. We must be rushed onward and foward like the passengers awaiting the plane in AIRPLANE!

    If we could slow down, smell the daisies, and contemplate what’s going on, we might realize what’s really happening. So, it’s always New Panic followed by New Panic followed by New Panic and more Crises. IRAN AND NUKES!!! GADDAFI IS NEW HITLER!!! ASSAD IS BEAST!!! PUTIN IS HITLER!!! TRUMP IS RUSSIAN AGENT!!! HATE CRIMES!!! NAZI RAPE SQUADS IN COLLEGES!!! WHITE COPS ARE KILLING INNOCENT BLACKS!!! All the hysteria in the media makes us feel like we are in parody of a disaster movie.

  • ali reza

    import of legal Indian and Chinese scientists and engineers is also too high. A nation of 300 million does not need over 50% its PhDs in engineering to go to foreigners. It is a vicious cycle, import more, more Americans leave the field and then you can claim a shortage and import even more… If the highest intelligence in a society does not pay the way it should, there will be less kids born with it. It is selection for now but later it will become (de)evolution. The token imports will not fix the change in values that propagates throughout the reproduction process. Curtail all immigration including high tech ones.

  • ali reza

    Trump has married off his kids to various Jewish Zionists. Their travel ban let’s every filthy Arab (new order will even let in Iraqis) in but not Iranians who have not killed anyone in US because Israel wants it. If anything Iranians who are basically white are the only ones banned. Now he wants more Chinese and Indians.

  • Aedra Daedra
  • kenpachi55

    Indians? it doesn’t take skill to program, just desperation or willingness to sit and write code all day for moderate wages. plenty of americans can do that but for only 50k I rather get some fresh air and do construction. his skills pay more cause we are flooded with Mexican that can do blue collar work. anyone can run the systems now that our father set it up so well. east Asian fuks techs and Mexicans the blue. we don’t need anyone we need a fair market to motivate people