Milo Yiannapoulos was attacked, and perhaps mortally wounded, by the defenders of the “conservative” establishment and their liberal allies-of-convenience. The weapons of choice were his own words, including disturbing comments about his sexual victimization by a Catholic priest and a seemingly carefree attitude towards the abuse of other young boys. Thus ended a two-year saga. Milo rose to fame channelling troll culture and being associated with—and mistaken for—the Alt-Right.

Perhaps Milo will succeed in making a comeback, but nothing can be as it was. Milo’s catch-phrases and monickers—“The Most Fabulous Super Villain on the Internet” and “The Dangerous Faggot Tour”—have taken on unsettling, indeed, criminal overtones. What’s certain is that Milo can simply no longer be a “conservative.” He might, like Jack Hunter, reboot himself as a kind of libertarian; it’s highly doubtful the Left will ever accept him after he was a traitor to his orientation. A likely outcome is that Milo will rebrand himself simply as “MILO,” as Breitbart began calling him in late 2016—a provocative gay entertainer, a pure brand, bereft of political connotations.

What’s more important for us is why Milo was assassinated. Julian Assange recently observered, “When you read a newspaper article, you are reading weaponized text that is designed to affect a person just like you.” Information, like morality, is a weapon. And both of these were deployed by a strange alliance of shitlibs and cuckservatives.

Needless to say, Milo was never Alt Right and was certainly never a leader or movement “darling.” Those insinuations were fake news.

Milo spent the last few months angrily denying he was Alt Right and giving speeches against “identity politics.” If the Alt Right is about anything, it’s identity politics. The Alt Right itself spent the last few months doing much of the same. Andrew Anglin memorably called him the “number one enemy of our movement,” among other less polite names, making my criticisms seem rather soft in comparison. Yet even with both sides openly declaring their hostilities, the Regime Press frequently declared this race-mixing homosexual Jew as the leader of European identitarianism worldwide.

And there was a deeper, Straussian motivation, which explains these misunderstandings and mendacities. Milo, along with Allum Bokhari, gave the Alt Right a sympathetic, if not particularly accurate, hearing in Breitbart. Had the piece not been authored by a sexual deviant and self-described “kebab,” it might never have been published. Despite it all, it was a major breakthrough. And like the commissars of the past, the Regime Press reacted harshly, for their role is to limit public debate and silence dissidents. Yiannopoulos—by breaking the cordon sanitaire around White identity and treating the Alt Right as comprised of rational people with real grievances and legitimate arguments—made himself an enemy.

The footage that killed Milo was not new. It had been circulated among some on the Alt Right as part of the general counter-signaling against the “Dangerous Faggot.” (I had never seen it until that fateful Sunday afternoon in February.)

Perhaps the most disturbing truth about this scandal is that Milo’s views about pederasty are fairly typical for many homosexuals. The mass media is already worried that people might start criticizing Milo in the wrong way. And our society has become such a cesspool that playing footsie with statutory rape is no longer barrier to fame and stardom, at least if you are staunchly on the left.

George Takei fondly reminisced about being criminally seduced when he was 13 (albeit by a 19-year-old boy, slightly more morally ambiguous that the relationships Milo glorified). Lena Dunham wrote about molesting her younger sister, who is now a lesbian. Roman Polanski pled guilty to the statutory rape of a 13-year-old girl, and yet is the toast of Hollywood. And Bill Maher, who may rival Yiannopoulos for degeneracy and who insanely took credit for his downfall, defended Mary Kay Letourneau for having sex with a 12-year old student. He denounced her being jailed “because she won’t conform to what society feels should be the perfect American family.”

Of course, Milo is a pervert. But perversion was his shield. In previous eras, one gained respectability by converting to the state church and being discreet with one’s immoralities. Today, respectability is achieved by dressing in drag and bragging about how many black cocks one sucks. Filth was what allowed Yiannopoulos to express mild disagreement with the liberal consensus on issues like immigration, “hate speech,” and race.

It is being reported that Yiannopoulos went down for backing “pedophilia.” This is not true. He went down for backing pederasty, also terribly damaging to victims, but distinctly so. Besides showing, once again, that the mass media simply lies to us, why does this matter? Because the chattering class has been, quietly but dedicatedly, attempting to normalize pedophilia for the last few years. The smoking gun was Salon’s deleting of its “understanding pedophilia” articles in the wake of Milogate, which was noticed by a few conservatives.

The Regime Press is crowing that a 16-year-old girl “took down” Yiannopoulos by finding the footage. But as the footage wasn’t new or unknown, this isn’t true. What “took down” Milo was a mysterious and unknown media operation—coming from what we’ll call “Deep Cuck”—and which might have been orchestrated by well funded and well connected groups, each of which was motivated to police discourse.

“Milogate” was simply the latest example of what has become one of the most important coalitions in American politics—the Cuck-Left Alliance. Both groups have a vested interested in making sure “The Narrative” stays within carefully controlled boundaries. And both had a specific reason to call in a hit on Milo.

For leftists, the casus belli was his appearance on Bill Maher’s show. Because Yiannopoulos once gave a fair hearing to the Alt Right, he was deemed worthy of being “no platformed.” Milo’s book deal with Simon & Schuster and mainstream media appearances suggested he was on the brink of a breakout; “MILO” qua brand might become Too Big To Fail. The hit had to be done right away.

The cucks had their own reason. Whatever else one can say of him, Yiannopoulos was one of the most prominent Trump supporters during the last primary and was also becoming one of the most in-demand speakers on college campuses. Add to this the fact that he . . . kinda, sorta . . . broached topics of racial realism and Jewish control of the media.

Yiannopoulos’s own political philosophy (if he ever had a coherent one) is not important. What’s important is that Yiannopoulos was creating the potential for young conservatives to go down forbidden ideological paths. And once that happens, the Beltway Right’s days are numbered. So instead of Milo (or “MILO”) giving an address at CPAC in 2017, we got Michael Reagan, who opposed Donald Trump and took the opportunity to do some Cold War LARPing and Russia bashing for all the Boomer-cucks in attendance.

Indeed, with the exception of Steve Bannon and Nigel Farage, CPAC 2017 was practically identical to what we would have seen if we had President Marco Rubio or Ted Cruz. Trump’s decapitation of the Beltway Right has not fundamentally changed the balance of power within “Conservatism, Inc.” CPAC still featured people like Dana Loesch, who fanatically opposed Trump, presuming to instruct us on “why the Democrats lost.” While conservatives are going to go along with Trump for now, the obvious strategy is to take credit for the victory of the man they opposed and attempted to undermine and then reinstitute the Ancien Régime the first chance they get.

Though the cucks are down, they are not out. McMullincost Trump Minnesota in the 2016 election, and that state is critical to building the Rust-Belt coalition a Trumpian GOP will need to keep the Electoral College for any length of time. More importantly, the cucks and their leaders in the Senate, like John McCain and Lindsey Graham, are running with the narrative of “Trump as Putin’s Manchurian Candidate,” which will be used to keep constant pressure on Trump . . . and could even fuel an impeachment drive if the Democrats retake Congress or the Republicans turn on their president (both of which are certainly in the realm of possibilities).

The average leftist believes Trump is insane, corrupt, possibly syphilitic, and mentally incapacitated. And yet, this man, in the teeth of unhinged madness, managed to conquer both political parties simply by hinting at a nationalist message. They are frightened. Trump succeeded because over the decades, he had built a brand and acquired a microphone too large for the leftists to nuke from orbit, though they certainly tried.

Thus, the Cuck-Left Coalition is there to ensure there will never be another Trump. The Left demands celebrities announce their adherence to far left politics, ensures pro-White views are dismissed with the usual clichés, and works to choke off funding and accessibility to alternative outlets.

Breitbart has already blinked in response to corporate pressure. If the Democrats ever retake the White House, can we be confident that pro-White organizations, personalities, and writers won’t get “no platformed” or even hassled by the government? Buzzfeed’s Joe Bernstein, having gotten Sam Hyde taken off the air, is now trying to get YouTube to ban the Alt Right and even “Alt Lite” figures like Paul Joseph Watson. There’s no reason to doubt that he and other journalists (who act much like commissars) may well succeed, especially because it will be the “true conservatives” who will give them cover. (After all, a private company can ban whomever it wants, right? Now bake that cake, bigot!)

Meanwhile, cuckservatives will use “muh moral principles” against perceived threats, with opportunistic concern trolling about homosexuality. It shouldn’t be taken too seriously.

Yes, what Milo said was beyond the pale, but the self-righteous Beltway Right is as riddled with closeted homosexuals as the Catholic Church. As I suggested in my notoriously misunderstood tweet about opposition to homosexuality as a kind of “last stand of implicit White identity,” the conservative movement and the American Church has used a limp resistance to degeneracy as cover for its larger cowardice. The Religious Right has often been drafted to provide air cover for efforts to allow more non-White immigration. Major conservative opponents of Donald Trump during the primary included the likes of Steve Deace, Erick Erickson, and Glenn Beck, all of whom mutter criticisms of gay marriage but are far more energetic about attacking any attempt by Euro-America to defend itself. And though it is “not an argument,” as Stefan Molyneux would say, it is nonetheless a truth that many within the GOP and Religious Right who define their raison d’être as opposing homosexuality turn out to be gay themselves.

Is acknowledging this an attempt to excuse degeneracy? Those who would argue yes should ask what self-appointed religious crusaders have actually been able to achieve when it comes to reversing moral decline. After all, it’s not like George W. Bush, returned to office by a massive evangelical turnout, lifted a finger to push through the constitutional amendment banning gay marriage that he promised. Today his daughter raises money for abortion.

And Mike Pence—memes notwithstanding—was also easily defeated by the homosexual lobby. When his rather lame attempt to protect “religious freedom” in Indiana was opposed by corporate America, he quickly caved. It’s worth remembering that before Donald Trump picked him to be Vice President, his political trajectory was decidedly downward.

Opposing degeneracy without linking it to a broader vision of race and society is doomed to failure. It’s as flawed as viewing tax cuts as the solution to demographic decline, or suggesting that sending the Constitution to Haiti would promote family values in Saint-Domingue.

Furthermore, refusing to acknowledge that everyone involved in this movement is prying themselves out of a culture of filth is operating in bad faith. Trump is memed as God-Emperor, but his past statements and actions on homosexuality and race would have been regarded as unacceptable and subversive by the vast majority of Americans throughout history. What’s worse, had Trump not done and said these things, it’s doubtful he would have ever achieved the platform that allowed him to run for president. Would we better off if the Cuck-Left Coalition had prevented Trump’s ascension?

In a normal society—not “average” or “mediocre” but adhering to a norm—we wouldn’t even be discussing these things. The reason we are is because degeneracy is used as a weapon against us, as part of a larger attack on our race and civilization. And the fact that so many leading this attack are Jewish simply can’t be ignored. If what is happening is not defined in these terms, any resistance to it will be as as impotent and feckless as the various efforts—genuine yet utterly naïve—to restore “Christian America.” Morality, spirituality and will are factors of battle as much as ammunition.

Yiannopoulos was never part of the Alt Right and whatever purpose he once served, he has outlived his usefulness. But we shouldn’t be deceived that the attack on him was a triumph of Christian virtue. It was a successful attempt to police thought by an elite struggling to regain control.

It will not be the last.

Leave a Reply

61 Comments on "Milo and His Enemies"

Notify of
avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
trackback

[…] that seems to exist in a continual state of effeminate hysteria, is gleeful about revelations Milo Yiannopoulos spoke to Alt Right personalities as part of an effort to, well, explain the Alt Right. The heart of […]

unpaidpundit
Guest
“Opposing degeneracy without linking it to a broader vision of race and society is doomed to failure.” Richard Spencer is limiting the appeal of the altright by linking opposition to homosexuality between consenting adults to a pro-white agenda. I realize that an anti-gay feeling is very popular among people who consider themselves to be altright. This anti-gay emotion is also illogical, irrational, and unscientific. There are cracked pots in every field, but the vast majority of psychologists and psychiatrists are not going to agree that homosexuality is “degeneracy,” “abnormal” or a mental illness. If Spencer hopes to win more support… Read more »
Murena
Guest

The difference between a “disorder” and a “fetish” rides on a value judgement. The value judgement in the case of psychology is not made from the empirical evidence itself.

SM Kovalinsky
Guest
“Yiannoplos was never part of the Alt Right and whatever purpose he once served, he has outlived his usefulness. But we shouldn’t be deceived that the attack on him was a triumph of Christian virtue. It was a successful attempt to police thought by an elite struggling to regain control. It will not be the last.” This is the crux of it. It says more in a paragraph than the rest of the well written piece altogether. It is an ominous closing, and it’s prophesy is inevitable, and will be fulfilled. Neither CPAC, nor Breitbart, nor Simon and Schuster ever… Read more »
jaye VBellis
Guest
I see Milo as a very bright, British comedian, who puts on an entertaining act and opposes lots of very bad things in politics, academia and popular culture. Britain has always had lots of very talented “gay” artists – writers, singers, actors – Brits like Oscar Wilde and Freddy Mercury. I have certain “issues”, boundaries with homosexuals/bi sexuals etc. I prefer the Victorian world on the American world of the 1950s where this stuff was not allowed in public. That said – Milo was silenced and basically banned from public life for something he said, not something he did. Milo… Read more »
Dillon Francis
Guest

Great read!

DissidentRight
Guest

The only interesting piece of information to come out of Milogate is this: Richard Spencer will viciously attack the enemies of his enemies, specifically, people who ‘break the cordon sanitary around White identity and treat the Alt-Right as comprised of rational people with real grievances and legitimate arguments’ when they are at their weakest.

A hymn to Hermes
Guest

Milo has been attacking us for the past 18 months, said violence against us is justified, and never said we were rational people with real grievances. He said his cohort of left-libertarians were the alt-right and that is who he is talking about.

DissidentRight
Guest

Milo has been attacking us for the past 18 months

Like when he defended Nazi memes on Dave Rubin?

said violence against us is justified

That’s a lie.

and never said we were rational people with real grievances

Are you calling Spencer a liar? Milo has said, many times, that whites have real grievances. Are you not white?

He said his cohort of left-libertarians were the alt-right

Really? When?

A hymn to Hermes
Guest
He has defined Alt-Right as “Cultural Libertarians” continuously since late 2015, which is a slander against us and directing his fan base to attack our ideas. The entire struggle over defining the label was provoked by Milo trying to Eternal September us. He absolutely memed on “Punching a Nazi” going along with the Leftist narrative at a speech. Not doing your research for you. If he wants to say that violence against “Nazis” isn’t justified he’ll have to say so explicitly at this point. His spiel about “whites having real grievances” is something from early 2015 and he’s been DR3… Read more »
Jason R.
Guest

Excellent analysis, Richard. I agree with some of the views below, however, that we can leave the Milo stuff behind and move on now.

Vautrin
Guest

Very good Richard! Way better than the last statement from you on this case. He is a pervert like most fags. He was litarally talking out of his private gay pockets. I know some gays. They all talking shit like that. Thats the reality of most gay people. I was not surprised by his statements.

Sam
Guest
Milo was referenced in a recent article wherein shitlib “scientists” are attacking Razib Khan for esposing HBD and being linked to the Alt-Right: https://undark.org/article/race-science-razib-khan-racism/ “Still, Khan’s career exemplifies the sometimes-murky line between mainstream science and scientific racism, and it illustrates how difficult it can be to define the boundaries between acceptable and unacceptable speech about race — and to understand what, if anything, science has to do with it. “This issue isn’t going away. Researchers are getting better at quantifying minute differences among individuals and among groups, and their findings will almost certainly be used, as they have long been,… Read more »
Einar von Vielen
Guest

How does this work with Trump?

Gubbler Chechenova
Guest

“Cuck-Left Coalition”

Political Cuckleftness is the new Political Correctness.

Gubbler Chechenova
Guest
“If the Alt Right is about anything, it’s identity politics.” More like Inheritance Politics. ‘Identity’ implies personal choice, like one of 50 genders. There’s an arbitrariness to it. In contrast, Alt Right is about accepting what you are. It is about inheriting, gratefully and graciously, the racial, cultural, historical, and territorial integrity of your people. It’s not a matter of choice. The decision has been made for you by the line of your people. Of course, one may choose to reject such inheritance. Or one may forget it. Or one may not have been taught it, in which case one… Read more »
Gubbler Chechenova
Guest

Milo is proof that the problem is not sexual repression but ‘sexual excession’.

Gubbler Chechenova
Guest
The problem of American Discourse is so much is conveyed without being spelled out. Those with the cultural antennas pick up the signals. Those without don’t get it. It’s like Matt Groenig(I hate him) said adults and kids pick up different things from TV shows. Kids just see funny stuff, but adults pick up the references and allusions. Consider Jewish NYT columnist David Brooks. Brooks seems to be saying one thing to ALL AMERICANS but signaling something else to members of his circle, his tribe, and etc. This is easier to pull off in the academia where the audience is… Read more »
Fred
Guest

Flynn, Milo, Compromise on illegals, now recuse have all been our recent losses. Let’s honestly look in the mirror. All eyes on Trump whether he will keep his campaign promises re immigration or further cuck under the pressure of Deep State.

CgntvDssdnt
Guest

“Mortally wounded”…”assassinated”…

Seems the more accurate metaphor is suicide.

After all, it was his own words that proved a problem for him.

JosephtheGreat
Guest
I’m not so convinced that the left is trying to “normalize” pedophilia. There are multiple ways one can look at it. The guy who wrote the Salon article was promoting chastity which is actually very different from what Milo was promoting which is that not all sexual relationships between adults and minors are harmful. I don’t think the Salon article was as extreme as many in the right made it out to be. In the 60’s and early 70’s it was not unusual to see NAMBLA members in the gay pride parades. These were people who would argue very strongly… Read more »
Jarod
Guest

Preaching to the choir Spencer.

MylesStandish
Guest
I can’t imagine why anyone under 60 years of age would support Trump. Old people are notoriously dumb and fall for even the most obvious scams, but the younger Trumpfags have no excuse. I’ve been following this mess for over a year, and still there has been no clear explanation; something about Mexicans, “the Iran deal”? It’s absolutely bizarre. The foreigners who showed up to support the Trump abomination are truly despicable – this Milo, Piers Morgan, nasty Sheldon Adelson – foreigners out! What makes these freaks think they are wanted here or that we care for their outlandish opinions?… Read more »
Bantz Henriksen
Guest

You hate the evil pro-Trump foreigners– But all the illegal spics and refugees and shit, that’s fine!

Lol, you tryhard WASP twat. Gtfo.

MylesStandish
Guest

Stay salty, dummy, and keep kissing jew ass.

Bantz Henriksen
Guest

Gtfo, faggot. We gas ’em ’round these parts.

Bernie Sanders✓ᵀᴿᵁᴹᴾ
Guest

I can’t imagine why anyone under 60 years of age would support Trump.

Because we’re heterosexual, you faggot.

Alex Harris
Guest

“I can’t imagine why anyone under 60 years of age would support Trump.”

-“Build a wall”
-“Deport illegal aliens”
-“temporary ban on entry of people who come from terror prone countries”
-“We will no longer surrender this country or its people to the false song of globalism”
-“If we don’t have a border, we don’t have a country”
-“America First”
-“I will punish companies that attempt to leave the US”
-“the forgotten Americans will be forgotten no more”
-“Angela Merkel is destroying her country”
-“Paris isn’t Paris anymore”

By the way, how is Cass Sunstein doing?

Celestial Time
Guest

It’s because of these types of articles and this precise style of lateral thinking that assures me Nationalism is the platform of the future, and Racialism the binding force that keeps it moving forward. Nicely done, Mr. Spencer.

Nothing_Much
Guest

*Ethnic nationalism, but yeah.

Celestial Time
Guest

Race > Ethnicity

“Ethnic Nationalism” without Racialism is just different recipe for a multiracial nation. I feel less of a kinship with black or brown people, even though we might share the same zip code, language and local and/or regional culture, than I do with the White man or woman who lives on another continent, speaks a different language, and doesn’t have the same culture as I do.

Nothing_Much
Guest

Good point, edited.

Hipster Racist
Guest
Only the idiots think Milo was a problem for pro-Whites as opposed to a problem for the anti-whites. He and the rest of the “Alt Lite” were nothing but a benefit to White Nationalists, as they drew the major heat away from us and kept the anti-whites fighting among themselves. Gavin McInnes is another one, even when he is counter-signaling against the Nazi cosplayers, it doesn’t harm pro-Whites because he spends most of his time attacking anti-whites. The Cuck-Left Alliance is a good and descriptive term. We are seeing that alliance in action yet again, as Jeff Sessions is being… Read more »
Mr. P
Guest

” here’s hoping a Biracial Lesbian Hindu becomes the next anti-SJW pro-Trump campus-speaking lightning rod.”

It’s time to deploy Kathy Zhu! I think the alt-lite and Gavin/Zhu are marching on Berkeley this weekend which should be good stuff. I wouldn’t be surprised if that group is attacked.

Leftist violence against figures like Milo/Gavin/etc drives more people in our direction. The smart leftists know this. Fortunately, the left has a large number of vile, violent, arrogant thugs filled with faux virtue that will do our work for us.

Abcdedcba
Guest

Get off Milo’s dick, Dick. This is… what… the fifth article/video you’ve dedicated to Milo since the “scandal” broke? Yes, it was very offensive for him to compare you to Jesse Jackson but dude get over it.

Jessica
Guest

You should get off of Richard’s. Why are you even here?

Abcdedcba
Guest

Lol. Know your place, woman.

Jessica
Guest

My place is here… calling out your hypocrisy,

Abcdedcba
Guest

How am I hypocritical?

I respect Richard a lot but it is really annoying how he won’t STFU about Milo. And I have no doubt it’s because Milo compared him to Jesse Jackson.

Milo has been useful to us by taking fire from the anti-white left. That Milo has occasionally punched right doesn’t detract from his usefulness, nor does this absurd scandal. Milo will continue to carve out his libertine, anti-IDpol niche, and the SJW left will continue to lump him in with us. Let him take all the heat he can.

Jessica
Guest

At first you came off as one of those damn Milo fanatics.

Abcdedcba
Guest

K.

Jessica
Guest

I can’t support Milo in any way. But you did a good job clarifying your views. 👌

Mr. P
Guest

The amount of Milo talk is strange considering Spencer was relatively one of the most pro-Milo people around.

I’m not a Milo fan like most of us around here but I think he’s the type of person that drove the masses in our direction.

Celestial Time
Guest

Can’t you just ignore it and not read it if it bothers you?

Lucy Lipinska
Guest

A truly impressing analysis, Richard Spencer. Surprisingly (?) many of the figures at the forefront of those attacks on our Western civilization do have a special loyalty either due their own (((ethnicity))) or an erroneous concept of Christianity.

Adolphin ++
Guest
“WE SHALL DESTROY GOD But even freedom might be harmless and have its place in the State economy without injury to the well-being of the peoples if it rested upon the foundation of faith in God, upon the brotherhood of humanity, unconnected with the conception of equality, which is negatived by the very laws of creation, for they have established subordination. With such a faith as this a people might be governed by a wardship of parishes, and would walk contentedly and humbly under the guiding hand of its spiritual pastor submitting to the dispositions of God upon earth. This… Read more »
Rutger3
Guest

Wow!

James OMeara
Guest

“his past statements and actions on homosexuality and race would have been regarded as unacceptable and subversive by the vast majority of Americans throughout history. ”

You mean, the unwashed masses?

“Washington’s pattern of ignoring same-sex relationships at Valley Forge was both indicative of his pragmatic nature (without von Steuben, Hamilton, Lafayette and others, America might still be a colony of the British) and of his seeming lack of concern over homosexuality.”

http://gayhistoryproject.epgn.com/historical-profiles/george-washington-gay-friendly-father-of-our-country/

The Real McGoy
Guest
lolwut! A shameless homosexual hints that we must stop noticing faggotry! You’re a known transvestite (easily confirmed with a quick Google Image) that has a blog about “wild boys” (named after a novel by W.S. Burroughs; a heroin-addicted faggot who fucked 13 year old arab kids and murdered his wife). I’m not even going to ask you whether you support pederasty or not; you’re a faggot and have your own in-group to shill for. And I doubt the answer would be honest. But hey, that’s exactly why we need faggots thrown the fuck out of the Alt-Right in the first… Read more »
James OMeara
Guest

Once again, words fail you.

The Real McGoy
Guest

Clever reference. And not inappropriate either, considering the pummeling you just received. Your idol, Mr. Vidal– a known pederast– would appreciate it.

Alex Harris
Guest

There’s the good kind of historical revisionism, and then there’s this…

James OMeara
Guest

What part of “as his extant letters reveal” don’t you grasp?

Alex Harris
Guest
Ugh. It strains belief that the Founders of America would have had anything resembling “tolerance” for homosexuality. We know homosexuality has been around forever, and at certain times throughout history it was more visible than others. But the founding of America was definitely NOT one of those times. Even if some of the Founders were Deists, the entire cultural milieu of Europe and the New World at that time was deeply, devoutly Christian. REAL Christianity, not the abomination we are suffering through today. Additionally, a homosexual publication is not exactly my idea of an impartial, objective, trustworthy source of information.… Read more »
Laguna Beach Fogey
Guest

That was very good. Well said.

Now can we all move on?

SM Kovalinsky
Guest

Worse will come to members of the Alt Right. Moving on isn’t much of an option.

Y Finkelstein
Guest

Yes, let’s throw Milo down the memory hole. Sorry, I meant glory hole.

Rascal
Guest

*slow clap*. Right to the heart of the matter.

Sally Anne
Guest

Well written piece Richard… I go by my gut and my gut never felt ‘right’ about Milo; nor his admissions of a previous involvement working in a United Nations’ capacity… to me its the little things that people say.. the smallest comments that tip me off as to their orientation.

Jessica
Guest

Oh hey, it’s you… that shill from YouTube named ”
Indie Media Eastcoast” that left so many comments in support of Milo all over Alt-Right videos…

Lucy Lipinska
Guest

A good riddance indeed.

wpDiscuz