News

Video Surfaces Of MILO Defending Pedophilia

Here’s the latest wrinkle in the MILO saga.

As I said on New Year’s Eve, “it is blindingly obvious that MILO is a scandal waiting to happen.” I said that “I bet there are many, many skeletons waiting to come out of that closet.” I even went so far as to predict that MILO will share the fate of the Hindenberg.

Anyway, that was then and this is now. Two months later, I still think MILO will implode at some point. As long as he is calling himself a conservative and giving the keynote address at CPAC, he’s not our problem though. Ideally, we can keep our distance and reap the benefits of the good work he does with free speech on college campuses while avoiding being tainted by the rest of his act.

It just so happens that MILO’s interests coincide with our own. He benefits from keeping his distance from us. By denouncing White Nationalism, he can move into the mainstream. We benefit from keeping our distance from him. He’s no longer being positioned as an “Alt-Right leader” and thus whenever he does implode it will be on the deck of conservatism.

Update: MILO has released a statement in which he claims that he is the victim. This is at odds with what he said in a previous interview. In that video, MILO even said he was present at Hollywood sex parties where older men were having sex with young boys.


Comment

88 comments

  1. DaveLDN 21 February, 2017 at 23:21 Reply

    Stop lying and backing up the Jews. He was defending regular homosexuality which includes drug use, degeneracy, and PEDERASTY. The Jews want to use pederasty as a wedge to normalise screwing small children. They want to say that “love” between a 20 yo and a 17 yo should not be criminal. Stop bundling fucking 5 year olds together with sex with adolescents.

  2. Roar 21 February, 2017 at 16:17 Reply

    Milo cannot be the only one who knows what celebs were at that party. All of Hollywood is sick and this should be investigated.

  3. Hipster Racist 21 February, 2017 at 14:52 Reply

    Just remember – the entire Republican party and conservative movement knew that their Congressional leader, Dennis Hastert, was a child molesting pedophile for decades, and did nothing about it.

    Milo isn’t being disinvited because he’s a gross pervert – Republicans are JUST FINE with child molesting perverts. Milo is being disinvited because he’s a “racist” (even though he’s actually not.)

    Conservative Republicans are fine with pedophiles and they are not fine with normal pro-White White people.

  4. ThomasER916 21 February, 2017 at 04:17 Reply

    Hunter Wallace has a history of believing the MSM and their hatchet jobs. He was anti-Trump all up until last month. Now, like a run-of-the-mill Useful Idiot, he believes the MSM again. This hatchet job was predicted by 4chan.

    Seriously, get your fucking shit together Hunter!

    https://i.4cdn.org/pol/1487639995475.png

    • Hipster Racist 21 February, 2017 at 14:44 Reply

      The Renegade people publicized this video of Milo over a year ago, along with Andrew Anglin’s anti-white and philo-semitic interviews, and his video with his self-described underage “jailbait girlfriend” who was not white. People have been talking about it for a long time. So anyone who is surprised simply wasn’t paying attention.

      That’s the problem with cults-of-personality, they tend to fall apart once the cult figure turns out to have feet of clay, which all people do.

      Especially trolls like Milo and Anglin should be kept at a distance because their job is trolling and eventually it will catch up to them.

      No one should be surprised by any of this. Just let the trolls troll and otherwise keep building a serious pro-White movement.

  5. basileus ✓ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ ˢᵘᵖᵖᵒʳᵗᵉʳ 21 February, 2017 at 03:50 Reply

    Mr. Wallace’s prediction that this Milo character is an accident waiting to happen sort of mirrors my comments on Breibart where hardly a day passes where isn’t glorified for one stunt or another. Invariably, I get flamed when I point out that he’s a sexual degenerate. He’s certainly not what I’d consider a good role model for our young people. The sooner this fraud goes down and stays there, the better.

    • stone2025 20 February, 2017 at 21:54 Reply

      Yes.

      The Alt-Right has been trying to warn brainwashed “conservatives” for a year that Milo is a degenerate, drug-addicted, pedophile, faggot Jew.

      Maybe this will snap them out of their pathetic Milo-worship.

      • Brian Geary 20 February, 2017 at 23:20 Reply

        Well, it IS a fact that the Talmud sanctions sex with children, as long as they are at least one day over three years old.

      • ThomasER916 21 February, 2017 at 04:11 Reply

        You have 140 comments on your account. You just showed up yesterday and all you’re doing is counter-signalling.

  6. Marathon-Youth 20 February, 2017 at 21:33 Reply

    One more point. Milo spoke of “drugged out parties with young boys have sex”, the interviewer (including flashing letters that said Milo is protecting Pedophiles) looked shocked and became defensive when Milo asked him if he has had sex with a 15 year old girl, or words to that. He answered if he was 15 yes but not at his age.

    I found that unbelievable. Here is a picture. that guy is drunk in a bar or a room and I mean he had a few too many Vodkas and maybe smoked some pot. A young girl comes within an inch of his lips with her naked perky tits. I believe he would have licked them and by doing that had a sexual experience with an underage provocative and hot girl.

    We live in an age of teenage pregnancies, tranners being accepted into high schools and I am to believe that a consenting age is strictly enforced by all people?

    Till the 20th century human sexuality in Western nations (by and large) were determined by society and not by governments. Here is a suggestion. Lower the age of consent when it comes to sex and increase the age to vote up to 30 years old. That way adults make decisions for nations while teenagers do what they normally do.

    • Brian Geary 20 February, 2017 at 23:22 Reply

      We know Trump would not only lick the girl, but have sex with her and then require an abortion (he said as much on the Howard Stern show). So for some of us who voted for the idiot to act outraged over Milo’s being a pedophile, while voting for one (Trump), is hypocritical.

      • Marathon-Youth 21 February, 2017 at 12:40 Reply

        I was dealing with the interviewer but since you include Trump then include yourself.
        You would ” have sex with her and then require an abortion:” so do not project that on Trump
        So how about me? would I liberally lick a perky tit if it is just an inch from my face and I am a bit drunk? yeah I would.

        If I am laying on a bed with 2 girls that I met. One is riding me while my eyes are closed and I feel really good. Then the next girl rides me. I reach over and feel her firm thighs as she leans towards me. Before I know it half her firm tit is in my mouth.
        later on I learn she is an underage girl of say 16 years.
        Or
        How about a 15 year old boy where a 25 year old hot naked woman makes love to him? would he simply walk away or enjoy? I believe he would do that latter.

      • Marathon-Youth 21 February, 2017 at 12:43 Reply

        Brian
        Human sexuality is a difficult subject at best and your hypocritical attempt to play the moral prude while linking my comment to Trump is downright pathetic

    • Hipster Racist 21 February, 2017 at 14:47 Reply

      No, the age of consent is fine just where it is. We should be willing to look the other way when a 16 year old boy has sex with his not-quite-16-yet girlfriend – but that doesn’t excuse an adult man in his 20s or 30s having sex with a 15 year old.

  7. Marathon-Youth 20 February, 2017 at 20:53 Reply

    Milo is a shocker. he intends to shock and he is good at that. To me the interviewer tried to be cool but he sounded defensive to accusatory. Whatever Milo is shocking both the liberals and the conservatives.
    will he last? I do not know. At 32 he is roughly my age (a bit older) and anything can happen to change his world view. One thing is for sure Milo is out there pushing the barriers on every front. I am sure they will push back

  8. DaveMD ✓ᴺᵃᵗᶦᵒᶰᵃˡᶦˢᵗᴰʳ 20 February, 2017 at 20:48 Reply

    Too much energy online being diverted from the far-Right to this clown who’s worshiped because his love for Black men gives his supporters a get-out-of-the-charge-of-racism-for-free card.

    The sooner his star burns out, the better. Paul Joseph Watson would be a better Alt-Lite figurehead; at least he openly denounces White guilt and Islam.

  9. The_Troll_King 20 February, 2017 at 17:19 Reply

    Mmmmm. “Ephebophilia is the primary or exclusive adult sexual interest in mid-to-late adolescents, generally ages 15 to 19. The term was originally used in the late 19th to mid 20th century. It is one of a number of sexual preferences across age groups subsumed under the technical term chronophilia.”

    Copied and pasted that from Wikipedia. So I don’t feel Milo is describing Pedophilia in the clinical sense. But yes, it’s more than a little disturbing that an authority figure is being protected by Milo. Especially with kids who are so young. I feel from a cultural stance it’s a very iffy thing. After all, the right to consent is twelve years old in Mexico. I should point that out, as many Christians give other Christians a pass, except when Islam is introduced into the social equation. Further, as Milo is a known troll, a very effective troll, it’s difficult to know when he’s being truthful and when he’s being hyperbolic to the extreme.

      • The_Troll_King 20 February, 2017 at 23:02 Reply

        Don’t accuse me of anything. I’m not the one helping to open the gates, encouraging the third world to invade Europe, America, Canada, and so forth with third world types like the Catholics and Lutherans are currently engaging in. Can’t take the heat, well get out of the kitchen as they say.

  10. Grant 20 February, 2017 at 12:39 Reply

    I don’t believe homosexuality is genetic. I believe it spawns in people due to either childhood trauma, curiosity likely due to puberty, brainwashing by porn/societal influence, lack of the father in the family, or the hormonal effects of our diet choices. Let’s not exclude the fact that some homosexuals and “transgender” people have a change of heart later in life. I believe we need to look further into to this, and understand the question why homosexuals and others choose this lifestyle. But of course, we seem too focused on trying to find a way to justify homosexuality and transgenderism. You watch, they’re try/trying the same with beastiality and pedophilia. We can’t let it get to that point! We must do what we can to protect our children as fathers/mothers or potential fathers/mothers! God Bless.

    • Y Finkelstein 20 February, 2017 at 12:56 Reply

      It has to be genetic in some men. We all remember the nancy boys we went to school with.

      Lesbians are a different story. Unpleasant nasty cunts.

      • Grant 20 February, 2017 at 15:53 Reply

        Genetics do play a part on the hormone levels in both men and women. However, we’re too quick to say that genetics is the reason without knowing the possibility of other attributing factors.

        First, outward appearance doesn’t fully define masculinity. It does play a huge part on biological sex, but masculinity and femininity has a much wider spectrum of details that define them.

        Now, there are very masculine women that turn out to be heterosexual, and the same can be said for men who appear effeminate, but display a masculine character. The complete opposite can be the same.

        Thus, this makes me feel as if sexual orientation is a preference, rather than something genetic. These preferences being largely due to societal influence, and the recent praise toward that lifestyle. Hence why there people choose to be asexual, or those that identify more with another type of “sexuality”, among the so many that are supposedly out there. But don’t exclude the other possibilities that mentioned in my main comment.

        In conculsion, we are biologically meant to be heterosexual, but it’s not forced upon us by our human nature. It is something people either choose, or are affected by another variable. Is it wrong? I believe so, since homosexuals are more likely to develop STDs. Yet many continue to live that lifestyle, which makes you question if it’s due to mental illness or something else.

    • listenupbub 20 February, 2017 at 23:28 Reply

      I support you. I really wish that there were more right-wing people deconstructing homosexuality.

      There are hundreds of types of sexual deviants and fetishes, many of them exclusive fetishes.

      If people can exclusively fetishize balloons or furries without being born that way, they can do it to humans of the same sex.

      Also, there is basically no homosexuality among primitive peoples. When told about it, they laugh.

    • Y Finkelstein 20 February, 2017 at 11:24 Reply

      Anglin is the National Enquirer of the Alt Right. Sensationalistic, provides good copy, and usually factual and correct in his stories.

  11. Abcdedcba 20 February, 2017 at 04:48 Reply

    I realize that Milo is controlled opposition who has punched right, but devoting energy to demonizing Milo is beyond retarded. I don’t care what he has said or done; until the left is destroyed, Milo is our ally. He’s certainly not an enemy. This “less pedophilic than thou” virtue signalling is toxic as fuck. Shame on you Wallace. Get your priorities straight, son.

    • Brad Griffin 20 February, 2017 at 11:52 Reply

      I’m not demonizing MILO.

      I’ve actually praised his work at Berkeley. At the same time, he is a flawed individual and his issues were bound to catch up with him. If I was justifying older men having sex with 13-year-old girls, it would catch up with me too.

      • Guy Atlas 20 February, 2017 at 14:36 Reply

        anyway, he’s clearly said that he doesn’t support pedophilia in a forum where he isn’t intentionally antagonizing folks. the alt-right is hypocritical to praise him when he says Feminism is cancer (and doesn’t mean it literally) but not when he says philia is fun (and doesn’t mean it any more literally}. If you alt-righters want to control what other folks believe and say, you’re just as bad as the left. Maybe you are the SJW’s of the right like another of the articles here asks. guess it’s not taking me too long to decide whether I’m alt-right or not, is it? attempting to make someone lose their livelihood (his is speaking at events) is a totalitarian SJW tactic, girls.

        • Y Finkelstein 20 February, 2017 at 15:16 Reply

          Fuck Milo. He compared Richard Spencer to Jesse Jackson when he rejected “identity politics.” This is great watching Milo and the Alt Lite implode.

          Also, many on the Alt Right don’t believe in the canard that is free speech. You can be damn sure that we will silence our enemies when we have power.

        • Johnny Fascist 20 February, 2017 at 15:44 Reply

          We attempted nothing you troll. He’s being destroyed by establishment republicans reporting (or distorting – I really don’t care which) his own words. I won’t be punching him while he’s down (unless he hurts our cause) but I damn sure won’t waste my time defending someone who draws fire as a matter of self-promotion.

    • Mr. P 20 February, 2017 at 17:42 Reply

      I agree – I think Milo is a net benefit but I’m not a believer in his ideology nor am I going to defend him.

      I’ll say this: anyone who is surprised by Milo’s comments about “boys” hasn’t been paying attention. He repeatedly calls Trump “daddy” and has talked openly about older man/very young man/teen relationships for a long time. I surprised it took so long for the public to catch on. I guess they were too busy calling him a “Nazi” to notice.

      I think deep down Milo wants to be straight. He realizes how dysfunction the homosexual community is even though he acts like the quintessential “faggot”. It’s like he wanted to expose how homosexuals aren’t oppressed saintly figures like the media portrays them – how they are depraved, hyper-sexualized. I think Milo wants the Pence electro-shock therapy, at least he tells the truth about gays.

    • Mr. P 20 February, 2017 at 17:43 Reply

      I agree – I think Milo is a net benefit but I’m not a believer in his ideology nor am I going to defend him.

      I’ll say this: anyone who is surprised by Milo’s comments about “boys” hasn’t been paying attention. He repeatedly calls Trump “daddy” and has talked openly about older man/very young man/teen relationships for a long time. I surprised it took so long for the public to catch on. I guess they were too busy calling him a “Nazi” to notice.

      I think deep down Milo wants to be straight. He realizes how dysfunctional the homosexual community is even though he acts like the quintessential “faggot”. It’s like he wanted to expose how homosexuals aren’t oppressed saintly figures like the media portrays them – how depraved, hyper-sexualized they often are. I think Milo wants the Pence electro-shock therapy, at least he tells the truth about gays.

    • listenupbub 20 February, 2017 at 23:22 Reply

      Yes, but this is the alt-right, a place that gathers people with IQ’s of 100 and no ambition. Nobody here actually cares about trying to accomplish anything; they are perfectly satisfied to do nothing but gossip about right-wing figures.

    • basileus ✓ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ ˢᵘᵖᵖᵒʳᵗᵉʳ 21 February, 2017 at 03:55 Reply

      No energy needs to be expended to demonize Milo. By his own admission he enjoys having anal sex with blacks males. He’s already demonized himself. He’s a sexual degenerate. Case closed.

  12. stone2025 20 February, 2017 at 00:57 Reply

    Every faggot is a pedophile.

    Faggots are violent, degenerate psychopaths who intentionally work to attack the foundation of civilization.

    Milo is no different.

    This is the reason that every, healthy society has always executed faggots. — Even America.

    When we reclaim our Nations, we must re-institute the historical and rational solution to deal with these diseased, perverse, civilization-destroying criminals. — Mental institutions and executions.

    • Jarod 20 February, 2017 at 01:45 Reply

      Wasn’t there homosexuality throughout antiquity though? Even ancient Greece and Rome had fags. I doubt this problem can be solved by gassing anyone who acts like a fag. There’s something in our genepool that allows this. It has to be identified.

      • stone2025 20 February, 2017 at 01:58 Reply

        The idea that Greece considered faggotry normal is a modern myth.

        The only times that faggotry was historically normalized was immediately preceding the civilizational collapse of a Nation.

    • Johnny Fascist 20 February, 2017 at 02:35 Reply

      My reading of history says something different. The white nations way of dealing with the problem is shaming, loss of all status, and prosecution of the sexual act. All designed to keep it in the closet.

      • stone2025 20 February, 2017 at 02:40 Reply

        Faggots were executed in Colonial and early-America.

        Same throughout history. — Especially throughout Christendom (Western Civilization).

        “If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.”

        — Leviticus 20:13

        • Guy Atlas 20 February, 2017 at 14:47 Reply

          fuuuuck your bible. who can argue with gooood for chriiiist’s sake? either argue or go preach somewhere.
          excuse me if i mistook this for a non-religious site. if it’s a christian bible site, i apologize and will leave immediately.

          • Johnny Fascist 20 February, 2017 at 15:36

            He made his points just as you did. It’s not somehow illegitimate if you make a point with a quote, whether it be religious scripture or not.

    • Guy Atlas 20 February, 2017 at 14:45 Reply

      that’s bullshit. faggots have played a major role in every civilization, including much of our western art and science and military theory. jeeze, haven’t you heard of Alan Turing? It’s even in a movie now in case you can’t read. In ancient Rome and Greece, our ultimate western civilizational heritage, it was perfectly acceptable for men to mentor young lads and also have sex with them only until they got older and married. Monogamous male/female marriage is the new and progressive thing, my budding buddy.

      • Alex Harris 20 February, 2017 at 14:50 Reply

        Yeah, man. Homosexuality and pedophilia has been the norm all along. How do you think our species managed to survive and propagate itself all this time? Stop “pining for some mythical past that never even really existed”, you ignorant, delusional breeder.

  13. Jusqu'au Bout 20 February, 2017 at 00:18 Reply

    Liberals say that homosexuals aren’t pedophiliac. Just another excuse corrupting our communities. There was a reason people like this were dealt with in a certain way for centuries.

    • Brian Geary 20 February, 2017 at 23:13 Reply

      You seem to be forgetting how many straight males are also attracted to children (little girls) including Donald Trump. Pedophilia, let’s face it, is a trait shared by far too many males, gay AND straight, and it’s time we face it and do something about it.

      • Jusqu'au Bout 20 February, 2017 at 23:53 Reply

        I’m not forgetting anything. But I remember the specific event where The Boy Scouts of America were forced to allow gay men as troop leaders. People were worried about pedophilia but Liberals reassured everyone that gay men weren’t attracted to young boys just older gay men. Remember that?
        Btw- any person (male/female/gay/straight) who is a pedophile or rapist should have their hands and genitalia lopped off and burned before them. I think most people here would agree.

      • basileus ✓ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ ˢᵘᵖᵖᵒʳᵗᵉʳ 21 February, 2017 at 03:53 Reply

        If he forgot, then why don’t you point us to some provenance to support your claim? You imply that a “lot” of “straight” males are pedophiles? In that case, they aren’t straight. Secondly, what is a lot. Sexual deviants of any kind are a minuscule percentage of the population. Pedophiles are a small subgroup of that. There aren’t a “lot”of them no matter where they come from. The problem is, any number is too many.

  14. Guy Atlas 19 February, 2017 at 23:52 Reply

    I think Milo replied correctly:
    “The shocking thing? It’s Republicans doing it. Sad to see establishment types collapse into the same tactics as social justice warriors: name calling, deceptively edited videos, confected moral outrage and public shaming.”
    I added altright.com to my feedly just a few days ago and have been enjoying the articles. This is the first I’ve seen of this type of back-stabbing and I sure hope it’s the last.

    • Hunter Wallace 20 February, 2017 at 00:08 Reply

      We’re not backstabbing MILO.

      He’s made it clear on Breitbart that he is not Alt-Right. He has denounced White Nationalism. He has said he wants nothing to do with Richard Spencer. That’s fine.

      As for MILO’s pedophilia problem, it doesn’t come as a surprise to us. I’ve written about it several times over the past year. I hadn’t seen this particular video until this evening, but I had seen the other one which was enough for me to predict on New Year’s Eve that something like this would happen. I saw the Twinks for Trump Party at the RNC.

      Again, if you have been following MILO, it doesn’t come as a surprise. I think he does great work on free speech on college campuses and said so in the previous two articles, but the Twinks for Trump event, the bathing in blood, and the disturbing comments about boys having sex with men was a major red flag to me. I saw it coming a mile away.

      It’s no one’s fault but his own. He is the one who put all this out there. He event went so far as to have Geert Wilders speak in front of lurid photos at the RNC.

      • Alex Harris 20 February, 2017 at 14:37 Reply

        Geert was probably right at home in the middle of that gay confab. He’s not one of us. He is some type of mixed-ancestry poseur with bleach-blonde hair. He gave the game away during that recent speech he gave in Germany. He told German patriots everything they wanted to hear. It was a great, rousing speech. But right in the middle of it he dropped something about our “jewish-Christian” culture. (I’m looking at what I think is another upload of the video now, and it is translated this time as “judeo-Christian”, but the first time I saw it it was definitely “jewish-Christian” culture. He also talks about defending homo rights against Islam. I am not for throwing gays off buildings, but they are definitely going to have to go back in the closet and start behaving in a normal way in public. And any gay predation of young boys should be met with swift, severe, and merciless retribution.

        If any of you are in the Netherlands or involved with Geert, you should get close to him, agree with everything he says, then once he gets elected start putting the screws to him.

      • Guy Atlas 20 February, 2017 at 14:57 Reply

        he did not put it out there. backstabbing never trumpers put it out and it was way out of context. then you decided to pass it along as if it were the gospel truth. Milo said later in that same video: “The law is probably about right, that’s probably roughly the right age. I think it’s probably about okay, but there are certainly people who are capable of giving consent at a younger age, I certainly consider myself to be one of them, people who are sexually active younger. I think it particularly happens in the gay world by the way. In many cases actually those relationships with older men…This is one reason I hate the left. This stupid one size fits all policing of culture. (People speak over each other). This sort of arbitrary and oppressive idea of consent, which totally destroys you know understanding that many of us have. The complexities and subtleties and complicated nature of many relationships. You know, people are messy and complex. In the homosexual world particularly. Some of those relationships between younger boys and older men, the sort of coming of age relationships, the relationships in which those older men help those young boys to discover who they are, and give them security and safety and provide them with love and a reliable and sort of a rock where they can’t speak to their parents. Some of those relationships are the most -”

        And this was edited out as well:

        “You’re misunderstanding what pedophilia means. Pedophilia is not a sexual attraction to somebody 13-years-old who is sexually mature. Pedophilia is attraction to children who have not reached puberty. Pedophilia is attraction to people who don’t have functioning sex organs yet. Who have not gone through puberty… That’s not what we are talking about. You don’t understand what pedophilia is if you are saying I’m defending it because I’m certainly not.”

        he’s clearly come out against pedophilia but you guys are SJW’ing him.

    • stone2025 20 February, 2017 at 01:38 Reply

      You’re in the wrong place.

      This isn’t the Alt-Cuck. — This is the Alt-Right.

      We’re not a bunch of degenerate Cultural-Libertarians, civic-nationalists, or neo-cons.

      We’re not here to “bring America together” or to champion “Muh freedom of expression”.

      The Alt-Right is a war party.

      Our (((enemy))) has taken control of our Nation, and we intend to destroy them. — By any means necessary.

      Milo is not our friend. — He constantly attacks the Alt-Right and our principles.

      Milo’s goal is to divert the masses away from the rapidly-rising, hard-right, Nationalist movement and steer them back to the left.

      Milo simply pushes a slightly different variant of the same (((cultural-Marxism))) that he pretends to be fighting.

      Milo is just another subversive member of the same, perfidious (((tribe))) that is intentionally destroying White, Western Civilization.

      Milo is the enemy.

    • Rascal 20 February, 2017 at 01:57 Reply

      Dude.. c’mon. Milo denounced White identity. He denounced it, and we are supposed to just defend him over what I consider a serious issues? I respect much of Milo’s past work, but he hasn’t earned undying defense from this community.

      • Johnny Fascist 20 February, 2017 at 03:24 Reply

        Of course we don’t defend him. Not only is he not one of us, he’s nothing more than a self-promoter. He’s been somewhat useful in drawing fire, but who cares that he took a hit. Let him bleed.

        • Rascal 20 February, 2017 at 03:40 Reply

          I completely agree. The fact that these fucking Milo fans expect some sort of solidarity is laughable. The shoe is on the other foot now. I may be a racist, but at least I ain’t a pedo, lol.

          • Y Finkelstein 20 February, 2017 at 15:26

            As someone said on Twitter, the Alt Lite are wishing they were called Nazis right about now. Instead they have to associate with a paedo.

          • Johnny Fascist 20 February, 2017 at 15:33

            My default move with something like this would be to stfu. No support, no punching right. That said, if we start to get smeared over this event, then punch away.

        • Y Finkelstein 20 February, 2017 at 15:25 Reply

          This is why I said Milo served a purpose as cannon fodder for the Alt Right. He’s taking all the Incoming fire and imploding, leaving Trump free to troll Sweden. Thanks Milo!

    • Johnny Fascist 20 February, 2017 at 02:31 Reply

      It’s not shocking when you consider the timing. There were many establishment Republicans that were unhappy (to say the least) that he was invited to CPAC. They fired a shot his way immediately.