Jay Dyer is a public speaker, lecturer, comedian and author of Esoteric Hollywood: Sex, Cults and Symbols in Film, as well as the host of the JaysAnalysis Podcast/Esoteric Hollywood. He is also a regular contributor to 21stCenturyWire, Soul of the East and the Espionage History Archive. Jay’s work covers a wide variety of subjects, including metaphysics, film analysis, theology, geopolitics, literature, and history.
Jay returns to Red Ice once again for a very timely conversation on current events, globalism, the deep state, and more. We begin by discussing the recent political assassination of Michael Flynn. Jay explains that there is an internal conflict within the deep state; one faction supports globalism, whereas the other supports nationalism. This leads to a closer look at what the deep state really is, and how Trump threatens this shadowy power structure. Later, we discuss fascism, which has been used as a bogeyman to scare people from tradition, natural order and hierarchy. Our show concludes with a few thoughts on the future of the Alt-Right.
Guests Website: jaysanalysis.com
Get the book here
Let me state it more forcefully. This guy is full of shit and I don’t understand why this website would even publicize him. You will regret it soon enough.
Why is Dyer now all over alt-right websites? He is a plagiarist and a dead end. Boring. You will not get blood from a stone. If anyone is really interested, look to his sources. This guy is a farce just trying to make a buck. Let me state it again, he is a plagiarist.
Why are so many Europeans in suicidal mode even when they must realize that current trends spell doom for their own kind? Have Europeans lost the old way, the vitality and health? Or is it something else?
In some ways, it seems ludicrous that so many Europeans are so afraid of speaking the truth or doing what is right out of fear of being called ‘racist’ or ‘xenophobic’. But maybe it’s not so strange. Maybe, the mentality is easy to understand.
Suppose you’re a soldier in a hopeless war. You know it’s better for your side to surrender and sue for peace. Continuance of war will lead to more deaths, even total erasure of nation off the map.
Suppose there’s a battle ahead where your commander orders you and others to charge against the enemy. In your heart of hearts, you know it’s nothing but a suicide mission. You know it serves no purpose. You know you have a better chance of surviving if you desert and run… or plot a mutiny. BUT, you fear being considered a coward or traitor. So, you decide you will charge and die with the troops for the sake of … honor. You fear what others will think of you if you act like a Negro and run like a mothafuc*a OR act like an Italian, soil your pants, and run to mama to hide under her dress.
PC isn’t about honor, but it messes with your mind in a similar way. Humans have certain sense of pride and right & wrong based on social norms and official ideals. And since of WWII, white people grew up with the cult of WWII guilt and the evil of ‘racism’. It is so sacred to them they would rather die in faith to this creed than turn against it. We say this mentality has become overly pathological — pathologically altruistic — , indeed to the point of collective suicide.
But consider Germany and its warrior cult and ideal during World War II. As the war wore on, Germans and Japans could have saved many more lives if they had surrendered earlier. I mean it was hopeless. Many more lives could have been saved if Germans and Japanese had been like French in 1940: choose quick defeat, humiliation, and peace(under German rule) than refuse to surrender, fight for honor, and lose many more lives(like Poles who kept resisting).
The Germans and Japanese kept fighting and fighting until they were totally defeated and crushed. Their sense of loyalty and honor trumped everything. And they feared being considered a ‘coward’ or traitor’. To die in huge numbers was more bearable than losing one’s sense of honor and loyalty by acting like an Italian and surrendering.
In the final scene of Kagemusha, all the men decide to die with honor in a futile battle than say NO WAY and run like Italians like in FAREWELL TO ARMS.
In a way, the values & themes have changed, but the mentality remains the same in the current West.
Europeans used to be nationalist and warrior-like. They used to revere the war heroes and great men. Today, Europeans are pacifistic and so ‘nice’.
And yet, both modes of outlook, the warrior and do-gooder, have something in common: Idealism and pride of ego. The themes have changed, but the mentality is the same.
Both the Warrior of Honor and Progressive of Conscience are motivated by ‘higher ideals’ that are dearer than life. In a way, such outlook is surely a strength because it leads to greater courage in war and greater commitment to peace. Consider the heroic British soldiers who stand and fight in ZULU against the odds.
BUT, it is also a vulnerability because the participants become so wrapped up in their conceit of pride and reputation. Both the warrior hero and progressive do-gooder can become pathologically mindful of how OTHERS think of them in accordance to the prevailing ideals or norms. Like a samurai willing to slit his belly for sake of honor, the white warrior and white do-gooder are willing to surrender even life itself for reputation.
Consider films like PATHS OF GLORY, CHARGE OF THE LIGHT BRIGADE, and GALLIPOLI. All three are about obvious suicide missions, and many knew how hopeless those operations were. But no one dared to say HELL NO, I WON’T GO since he feared being seen as a coward or traitor. So, they just obeyed and charged into sure death. (In LORD JIM, the hero chooses death at the end to redeem his reputation.)
Today, Europeans don’t invade anymore. Instead, they INVITE the world with faith in Diversity as a strength and wonder. Even though facts say otherwise, the redemptive European idealism since end of WWII was founded on being so Nice, Inclusive, & Tolerant and denouncing all particularism. These have become articles of faith, sacrosanct in the current definition of ‘Western Values’. Just like many Christians were willing to die for God than save themselves, today’s Europeans would rather die for what they deem Sacred than save themselves. Their pride, prestige, and egos are invested in Diversity and Inclusion. (Muslims have some of this too. Some will choose to die for Allah. Suicidalism for the higher good or sense of ‘justice’)
So, if the past cult of heroism drove warriors into hopeless battles for the sake of honor, the current cult of redemption drives do-gooders into hopeless attempts to be Good People, even at the risk of life and limb.
From the suicidal charge to the suicidal embrace. In the former, soldiers feared being considered cowards & traitors to the nation. In the latter, do-gooders fear being considered ‘racists’ or traitors to ‘social justice’.
In the past, the ideal of the warrior led Europeans to invade even when it was suicidal. Today, the ideal of the do-gooder leads Europeans to invite even when it is suicidal.
From pathological militarism to pathological altruism.
Merkel thinks she’s like Cool Hand Luke eating 5o eggs. Germany can take in 50 gazillion migrants, she thinks.
But in her earlier incarnation, she was a python that swallowed a porcupine.
Looks like Merkel swallowed a porcupine again.
I listened for around 10 minutes, speeded the tape up to the next segment, did not show much change so I kept notching it to the next 10 or 15 minutes until I ran out of the video.
This guest spends an hour talking about globalism, the Deep State, Soros, the media, Marxism, AntiFa, Cass Sunstein, Fake News, regime change in the Middle East, and war with Russia — and he never utters the word “Jew”.
And he pushes the standard, Jew propaganda about WWII, Hitler, fascism, and the Holohoax.
“The communists are the REAL fascists!”
Why is an Alt-Right website posting this normie-tier, Alex Jones style misdirection.
The last two Red Ice videos posted here have been an interview with a clueless normie and a feminist, anti-Christian Satanist.
Not a good sign for Red Ice and Alt-Right dot com.
You did not listen to this interview.
Shit-posting Le Merchant cartoons is fun and everything, but if you wish to actually fight Jewish evil, you need to educate yourself regarding the core philosophy and eschatology behind Their worldview and plans.
Jay Dyer can help you learn about these things, but it will require some Agency on your part.
“You did not listen to this interview.”
I listened to the entire show. — How else would I know that he never uttered the word “Jew”.
“you need to educate yourself regarding the core philosophy and eschatology behind Their worldview and plans.”
I’ve forgotten more about Jewish subversion than you will ever know.
You sound like a lightweight, straight from the Alex Jones program, who just discovered the Alt-Right.
Stick around and you might learn more about the Jews — and successful propaganda.
Jews mesh well with globalist values (although not all, as some exceptions work for Trump and Trump himself has many Jewish family members).. but they aren’t the end all be all. They work well as middlemen (media, bankers traditionally) in their host countries but to put it all on a zog conspiracy is simplistic black and white thinking, where as real life is more complicated. Theres more goy globalist elites than Chosen. Lots of players with their own angles but pursing a common goal.
It’s simpler than that.
Red Ice would be banned and the producers arrested if they named the Jew.
It’s close enough for most people.
The entire show was about Umberto Eco’s Ur-Fascism.
Echo Echo Echo…
THEY’RE NOT PUTTING PEOPLE IN OVENS?! WHAAAAAAAAAAT THE FUCCCCCCCCCCCCK RED ICE DUUUDDDE
What’s more potent than MEIN KAMPF and THE PROTOCOLS OF THE ELDERS OF ZION in stoking antisemitism? Jewish behavior itself. It awakens people to the true vile and vicious nature of so many Jews. Jewish attitude, arrogance, and contempt are what triggers people into hating Jews.
I mean… how can one NOT be an anti-Semite after dealing with so many people like Tim Wise, Sarah Silverman, Bret Stephens, and William Kristol?
It’s their group behavior, not individual behavior, that convinced me. We have to look at what Jews are about as a group. They move from one society to another while remaining separate. This means that they have different group interests.