The author is the director of the Liberty Institute, a Russian think tank, and a senior official in the Motherland (Rodina) party, a conservative party represented in the Russian parliament. Translated by Vincent Law. Original article appeared at Russia Insider
The popularity of the new US president among Russian New Right patriots seems, at first glance, to be something of a paradoxical phenomenon. However it is in fact, a continuation of an old Russian custom. Russians have a tradition of taking foreign ideas concerning politics as their own, adapting them to Russia.
It all started back in the days of Prince Vladimir- (whose historical memory is experiencing a Renaissance in Russia.) Vladimir, for political, economic and military reasons, embraced the faith and order of the neighboring Byzantine Empire, laying the foundation for the future concept of a “Third Rome.” It was Vladimir who carried out large-scale social and political reforms, influenced by ideas taken (this time) from the East.
The next major political and social import came from the West. Peter the Great “opened a window into Europe” as the saying goes when he established the city of St. Petersburg. He immediately began importing Dutch and German culture into Russia.
Soon after, French influence began to influence Russian society. The Russian aristocratic class began to speak almost entirely in French. Even on the eve of the War of 1812, Napoleon Bonaparte enjoyed incredible popularity among the Russian officers that were arrayed against him. What is remarkable is that Napoleon was probably more popular then among Russians than Trump is now. But this did not prevent the Russian people from going out to stop Napoleon’s invasion and eventually going on to march all the way to Paris.
Moving along through history, the Decembrists in 1825 picked up many ideas from the French and American revolutions as a result of their time in the West after the defeat of Napoleon. Liberty, equality and fraternity; the republic and nationalism, populism and aristocracy. They eventually would go on to unsuccessfully lead an officer’s coup in Russia in the name of these principles.
Then of course came the events of 1917. The February Revolution was imbued with the spirit of both the French Revolution and the pathos of the English parliamentary system…even if the end result resembled neither. And the October Socialist Revolution bore the hallmark of German and American ideological strains (old Russian patriots in this case like to focus on the Jewish roots of the Bolshevik movement, but I’m putting that detail aside for now). The theory of the Bolsheviks was imported from Germany (Marx and Engels). And the pace of the public-political movement was borrowed from the United States. Trotsky admired America quite a bit, and believed that the revolution would not have been possible without America’s help.
Many Third Position philosophers in Europe considered the United States and the Soviet Union to be two sides to the same coin. They referred to both entities as “mondialist” (which is similar to the term “globalist” which is more in vogue now.)
In turn, the Russian White Army exiles of the 20s and 30s borrowed many ideas from the European Right. But unlike the Russian Bolsheviks, the Russian White Army exiles never succeeded in bringing reforms to Russia based on these Third Position principles.
Then came Gorbachev’s perestroika program and Yeltsin’s democratic reforms, where the Western model was imported wholesale to Russia- even if it was never quite fully adopted. During that period, even the Russian opposition youth movements tried to adopt Third Position ideas from the first half of the 20th century.
Therefore, the current Russian fascination with Trump and Le Pen is quite normal for Russia. The American and French populist right-wing alternative movements serve as inspiration for Russian patriots just as previous historical movements have throughout all of Russia’s history. Only now, there is an interesting new element in the relationship. There is a mirror-effect where patriots in the West seem to have taken a great liking to President Putin as well. He seems to be especially popular among the so called “Alternative Right”.
We don’t yet know how Trumpism and Le-Penism will be adapted and adopted in Russia. But now it is clear from Trump’s victory, the potential success of Le Pen, and the rise of Eurosceptic parties all over Europe that things have finally started to go our way. All the signals from the West are clear to the Russian New Right. They read: “Alternatives exist and victory is possible.”
“Everything will change, right here and right now” – Trump said in his inaugural speech. He was speaking to the American people, but his message was heard loud and clear in Russia as well. To everyone in Russia, in whose veins “flows the red blood of patriots,” a new day has come.
The Alternative Right everywhere is ablaze with excitement at Trump’s victory.
“But this did not prevent the Russian people from going out to stop
Napoleon’s invasion and eventually going on to march all the way to
The Russian people didn’t stop Napoleon, they did nothing but retreat, then burned their own capital and waited for him to turn around.
And what exactly is the Russian alt right? Dugin? He’s alt-Soviet.
I wonder what Soviet-phile Francis Parker Yockey would make of all this.
One imagines his visage in heaven smiling down upon Trump & Putin as they usher in a New Age of Authority…
So far one of the most disturbing things to happen in the Trump administration was the firing of General Michael Flynn. He was the military man most in favor of a more positive relationship with Russia. The other guys still see Russia as Enemy Number One.
The Poles and the Balts are thinking three words right now: Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact.
Do you think their fears, however understandable, are realistic?
“…patriots in the West seem to have taken a
great liking to President Putin as well. He seems to be especially
popular among the so called “Alternative Right”.”
I would point out that, as the author implied, the appeal is not necessarily Alt-Right or even White Nationalist, but much broader among conservatives who had grown disillusioned by run-of-the-mill attacks on *everything* Moscow did or said; conservatives who had grown tired of Washington’s war mongering. Moreover, the appeal is not really to Putin himself so much as to Russian nationalism in that it promotes – or at least defends – Russia’s interests (and culture and religion, and…and…etc..) boldly. Virtually no other White European country does that, so Russia stands out. Among White Nationalists, I think a strong pro-White, pro-Christian Russia has always been admired (think Dr. David Duke, perhaps Pat Buchanan).
Let’s hope Trump’s instinctual desire to forge a better relationship with Russia is not thwarted. The media and the Deep State are doing everything they can to foment discord and war with Russia, pretending we are still enemies and that it is still the Cold War. Russia and the US have more in common than not, and need to work together on issues of common interest. We’d do well to work with Russia and Eastern European nations (Hungary in particular), which are at the forefront of the effort to counter the globalist liberal monoculture embraced by US and EU media and political elites.
> Peter the Great “opened a window into Europe” as the saying goes when he established the city of St. Petersburg. He immediately began importing Dutch and German culture into Russia.
He immediately began importing (((Dutch))) and (((German))) culture into Russia.
Peter the Great destroyed Orthodox Christianity, the very thing that is Making the Rus Great Again.
See: http://www.rusjournal.org “Anarchism and Orthodox Community:The Politics of Sobornost, the Ancient Ritual and the Destruction of Old Russia by the Petrine State (Excerpt from the Book, Sobornosti: Essays on the Old Faith)”
Good point, and its awesome to hear that fine book mentioned as I happen to be reading it right now, and strongly recommend it. The author, Matthew Raphael Johnson talks on several of his excellent podcasts, ” The Orthodox Nationalist”, about how thousands of cossacks representing the finest of old Russia, were killed in the creation of St. Petersburg. And how this represents the NWO in all its diobolical masonic evil.
Good flash-review of Russian history. Puts the Soviet period where it belongs, between parentheses as a tragic, traumatic episode.