Superbowl Commercial Tries to Guilt Millions of Americans Into Accepting Illegal Immigration

Lana adds commentary to 84 Lumber’s Superbowl commercial advocating for illegal immigration. It shows a poor innocent Mexican woman and her child arriving at the border only to be stopped by Trump’s big bad evil wall.




  1. johnmilius77 12 February, 2017 at 05:33 Reply

    I heard about the Budweiser commercial and decided to skip this Super Bowl.

    Since so many people are tuning out the Globalist Elites have to make their propaganda stronger to have the same effect on the few remaining viewers… Which then alienates them… It is a down-ward spiral right now for radical progs.

  2. Gubbler Chechenova 10 February, 2017 at 14:07 Reply

    Berkeley Option: “If you say something that offends me, I will bash your skull in with a baseball bat and should have the right to do so.”

    Btw, if we call it ‘free speech’, it puts us on the moral defensive.

    Though legally justified, it implies we are saying something offensive or untrue under protection of free speech laws.

    We must come across as both legally justified and morally justified.

    We must say we want to speak the Truth. Truth is more righteous than ‘free speech’.

    As the MSM spins it, the other side has the truth and we have untruth, but we want to speak our untruth under protection of Free Speech laws.

    No, we have the truth.

    Truth triggers the deluded, and the violent reaction we are seeing is proof that the other side cannot win an argument and must resort to threats and violence.

    TRUTH, not ‘free speech’. We have the right to speak the Truth.

    PS. Too much of the violence is goy vs goy, just as the GLOB wants it. As long as it’s goy vs goy, the GLOG puppet-masters will provoke both sides to attack one another.

    We must change the narrative by focusing on how Jewish Power manipulates these issues to play divide-and-rule by pitting goy vs goy.

    How pathetic that we have white ‘leftists’ allied with POC in attacking other whites?

    Those who control the media control the narrative. And they are the ones who wink-wink encouraged this kind of violence. Open Season was declared with the attack on Richard Spencer. The media not only didn’t condemn it but endorsed it. The message went out loud and clear. ‘Punch Nazis’ and since Trump is ‘literally hitler’, ‘you may hit any trump supporter, and we in the media will not condemn you.’

    So, NO, we are not for ‘free speech’. We are for TRUE SPEECH.


    What in the hell is this idea of ‘sanctuary city’?

    A nation is supposed to be a sanctuary for its citizens protected by rule of law.

    Turning cities in that nation into ‘sanctuaries’ for law-breakers, invaders, and cheaters undermines the very notion of what a nation-state is all about.

    Also, it means that the urban elites, the main power-holders of the nation, prefer to side with illegals and invaders than with their own fellow citizens.

    What in the hell is this idea of ‘sanctuary city’?

    A nation is supposed to be a sanctuary for its citizens protected by rule of law.

    Turning cities in that nation into ‘sanctuaries’ for law-breakers, invaders, and cheaters undermines the very notion of what a nation-state is all about.

    Also, it means that the urban elites, the main power-holders of the nation, prefer to side with illegals and invaders than with their own fellow citizens.

    These ‘sanctuary cities’ are Above-the-law cities and extralegal cities.

    Also, they want illegals to use as servants for cheap wages and sanctuary-buffer-cushions against black crime.

  3. desertspeaks 9 February, 2017 at 23:24 Reply

    She abandoned her child.. what a horrible parent! put her in prison for child neglect and endangerment!

    Did I mention that the commercial didn’t elicit the response that was desired??

    • TransPride 12 February, 2017 at 22:38 Reply

      Wasting millions of dollars on a wall won’t do anything but waste our tax money. There will always be a way for people to get in. When you are desperate and in need you will do whatever it takes, especially if it’s for the needs of their family.

  4. Gubbler Chechenova 9 February, 2017 at 21:12 Reply

    End of History is a Gangster Paradise.

    Gangsterism was institutionalized and industrialized.

    Power was always dirty and low-down. People were always pigs, and the powerful were always exploitative and nasty.

    But the difference is that the element of Shame and Ideals are gone, along with borders and rule of law.

    Francis Fukuyama said ‘liberal democracy’ is the final ideology and value system that all should aspire to. But the problem is ‘liberal democracy’ can mean just about anything. It has no Core Vision or Set of Ideas. Rather, it is a game theory that says democratic political system and capitalist economic system work best. That may well be true, but what would people do with freedom? A liberal-democratic-capitalist ideologue might argue that the Rule of Law and Market Dynamics will ensure individual liberty and equal opportunity for everyone for all eternity.

    But in the end, do people live for ‘liberty’? Isn’t freedom just a means to Power? And isn’t power about gaining control over others?

    Also, do people seek success & power only on the basis of individual ambition? Or do they have wider identities by race, tribe, religion, and/or ethnicity? After all, Mormons do have think in terms of Mormon power and not just individual success.

    Also, what if people who use their freedom to gain great wealth decide to support the kind of ideologues who serve their tribal or ethnic interests. And suppose these ideologues push for selective liberty, the kinds that favor the ruling elites while shutting down everyone else?

    Even in a liberal democracy, most people will believe what they’ve been taught and drummed into their skulls. Their ideological conviction could easily come to trump the ideal of ‘liberal democracy’. (After all, there was hardly any outrage upon the revelation of Edward Snowden.) So, if young ones in a liberal democracy are raised to believe that ‘hate speech’ is wrong, then they will call for censorship, like in the EU and Canada. And even in the US, despite its First Amendment protection, economic and political forces can act in concert to effectively shut down certain voices despite it being a violation of “no discrimination based on CREED”. Young ones think they believe what they believe out of freedom, conscience, and knowledge; they don’t understand that those ideas and views were planted in their minds by the powers-that-be. They fail to understand that stuff like homomania has been formulated to favor elite minority privilege, thereby favoring the power of the globalist elites who are a minority in all nations except their own. Globalists of all color favor elite minority privilege because, on the global scale, every nationality is a minority. Jewish elites are minorities in gentile nations, Chinese elites are minority in non-Chinese nations, Asian-Indians elites are minorities in all non-Hindu nations, Mexican elites are minorities in all non-Mexican nations, and etc. So, for them to play on the global level, they must make the entire world submit to elite minority demands.

    Also, freedom isn’t the same as power. For example, a Palestinian-American and Jewish-American has the same rights of speech and freedom guaranteed by the US Constitution. But Jews control media, politicians, and industries. In contrast, Palestinians don’t have much. So, when powerful Jewish people use their right of speech, it is infinitely more consequential and influential than when powerless Palestinian-Americans use their freedom of speech. Liberal Democracy ensures equality of basic rights, not equality of power and influence.

    So, the groups and individuals who are better at gaining wealth, power, and influence through industry, institutions, and government will have much greater power than everyone else. (And even though liberal democracy is about one-man/one-vote, those who control the media and can afford the ads have the power to sway millions of minds. So, the system is more like one-man-with-million-dollars-sways-million-votes.) Worse, they may then manipulate the rules of ‘liberal democracy’ in gangster-like ways to entrench their power and destroy their enemies. So, today, Jewish-Americans have much greater power over Palestinian-Americans because Jews are better at making money and gaining control of media. But tomorrow, Jews might use their power to pressure politicians to push through laws against ‘antisemitic’ speech, which could be interpreted to include anti-Zionist speech, in which case even the basic right of liberal democracy will be denied to Palestinian-Americans.

    Consider the rise of homo power. In a sane liberal democracy, homos should be tolerated and allowed to do their own thing. But the powers-that-be didn’t end there. They spent massive fortunes and media control to promote homomania as the dominant Culture and the neo-religion of America. They even associated homosexuality with marriage, thereby changing the entire meaning of matrimony. And then, the powers-that-be forced bakeries to make wedding cakes for homo ‘couples’. And the powers-that-be used terms like ‘homophobia’ to create the impression that those who oppose the homo agenda are sick in the head. And then, the powers-that-be hyped and celebrated homo-stuff so much that American sheeple think homo-ness is the happiest and most cheerful thing in the universe.

    In this way, liberal democracy is undermined. It went from guaranteeing tolerance for homos to forcing school-children to accept and praise homosexuality as the New Normal associated with the ‘rainbow’. It ended up destroying businesses that won’t go along with the desecration of marriage by Jewish supremacists in the Supreme Court.

    So, in the end, liberal democracy leads to Gangster Paradise of those who have the power. Also, the cases of EU, Canada, and US have demonstrated that just because people live in a liberal democracy doesn’t mean that they will support the principles of liberal democracy. They can be indoctrinated to be selective in their support of freedom. They will go along with the brand of ‘liberal democracy’ to support that which is deemed ‘correct’ in accordance to the ideas and passions approved by the powers-that-be. So, we have lots of influential people who will say, “I believe in free speech but not hate speech” — of course, they get to decide what is ‘hate’. And we have hardly any condemnation or actions taken to stop the violence against Trump voters who are deemed as ‘nazis’. If anything, the Jewish-controlled media have sent signals that it’s okay to punch and attack people like Richard Spencer. They called for Open Season.

    And in the Muslim World, we saw how liberal democracy heralded by Arab Spring was soon undermined by Islamists who came to power. For the Islamists, democracy and freedom don’t mean guarantees of free speech to criticize Islam or Muhammad. Certain things are sacrosanct and cannot be touched. Islamists may want democracy, but they are willing to sacrifice certain tenets if they offend their sense of righteousness. In this, they are no different from Jews of EU who demand that ‘liberal democracies’ clamp down and silence anyone deemed ‘antisemitic’ or ‘anti-immigrant’. People in Germany have been silenced, fined, or even jailed for uttering views that were regarded as ‘offensive’. This way, patriotic people of Europe cannot even say what is necessary to defend their own nations. Their hands are tied behind their backs.

    Liberal Democracy has become the plaything of globalists since they got all the power, wealth, media control, institutional control, and politicians in their pockets.

    Globalist version of Liberal Democracy is no longer constrained by communism that insisted on the moral imperative of the working class. Communism said the elites must serve the workers and couldn’t just serve themselves. So, even though communist nations were repressive and corrupt, the elites couldn’t just be gangster-gangsters. They had to be morally-justified gangsters with some restraint.

    Nationalism also had a constraining effect on the elites. It said the elites must be representative and responsive to the people of the nation. So, liberal democracy within a nation must serve that nation.

    But globalism that triumphed with the End of History was constrained by nothing. It didn’t have to answer to the proletariat like communism did. It didn’t have to answer to the patriots like nationalism did. Globalism said the elites of the world could just work on the individual or tribal basis to become as rich as possible. And globalism was weak on Rule of Law since different nations have different laws. So, if American businesses wanna override regulatory environmental laws in the US, they could just send their factories to Mexico or China. Rule of Law is effective only within national borders. Across borders, it turns into shambles since different nations have different laws. Of course, globalists call for a set of standards that is to apply across national borders, but they write and rig these laws to maximize their own power, position, and wealth. Look how the erosion of national sovereignty in the EU has led to rise of the elites and the fall of the national masses.

    Is it any wonder that the favored musical form of the globalists is rap music. It’s about Gangster Paradise. If kids are brought up with a culture that glorifies the gangster and thug, then they will be less appalled by such behavior among the globalist rich. If kids are dancing to Jay-Z’s thuggery or some other gangsta paradise trash, why would they be appalled by the gangster-behavior of so many rich folks, celebrities, and politicians? In a way, the rise of Trump owes to this gangster-narrative. He’s been effective at flaunting his prowess as a man of toughness and power. The odd thing is he has signaled against globalism-as-gangsterism-against-the-people. He is a real contradiction.

    Also, consider the rise of casinos. It used to be seen as a decrepit Vice Industry for degenerate gamblers that should be limited to Las Vegas and Atlantic City. But as the West grew more and more shameless and immoral, gambling spread like cancer all over. It was even moralized as the economic savior of depressed communities and those poor Indian-Americans. So, the immoral was made moral, and the globalist gangsters got to rake in more and more for themselves. Gambling was once considered seedy and sleazy, esp. when it was associated with the Italian Mob. It was a sin. But it was turned into a family-place-to-be with excessive advertising and promotion campaign. It goes to show that people can be sold anything. It’s like advertising long ago convinced women that it was ladylike to smoke. Spread images of glamorous women smoking, and people will associate glamour with smoking.

    If Las Vegas was made into a-family-place-to-be, Disney(once an industry for family entertainment) was turned into a whorehouse-for-kids. It spawned the likes of Britney Spears, Christian Agorilla, and Miley Cyrus. Disney would get these ‘wholesome’ kids and start them on whore-lite(which is ‘innocent’ by today’s standards), but they would invariably grow up into total skanks.

    Las Vegas was made ‘family-ish’, and Disney was made ‘porny-ish’.

    And look at the rise of MMA fighting. It used to be that boxing had boxing rules, wrestling had wrestling rules, and other sports had its own rules and limits. But MMA is about using all manner of nasty techniques to destroy the enemy and even ground and pound him when he’s down. And as athletes and celebrities now have tattoos all over, the message is loud and clear that excess, egocentism, and exhibitionism are what life is all about.

    And there is the globalization of both porn and pornification of culture. The internet has made porn global, and that means tons of young girls grow up seeing porn people as just another bunch of ‘cool ‘celebrities. And music culture has stuff like bumping-and-grinding and ‘twerking’ that was ‘invented’ by blacks who are the most uninhibited, savage, and aggressive race on the planet. Even though most blacks lack the brain power and ingenuity to rise to the top(like Jews have done), their cultural influence of gangsta-ism and punkass-ism legitimize globalism’s gangster-paradise-anti-ethos.

    So, even though Mark Zuckerberg and George Soros don’t act like rap music gangstas, their worldview is one of total monopoly, manipulation, and power-hunger.

    Also, globalist gangsterism is protected and promoted by diversionary tactic of making people focus on the wrong things as the source of evil. For instance, consider how the globalist media have so many morons worried that the West is about to be taken over by Nazis, KKK, or ‘fascists’. It is so laughable.

    Imagine a slave-owner who dupes his slaves into thinking that he is a noble protector of them against the Chupacabra monster. Even though HE is the one who is oppressing and exploiting the slaves, his moron minions cling to him for protection and ‘liberty’ from the Chupacabra monster that is supposed to be lurking all over.

    All this stuff about ‘Nazis’, ‘hate’, and ‘fascists’ is very useful for the globalist gangsters since it diverts the gaze of the masses away from the Real Power(held by globalist) and makes them focus on imaginary ‘Nazis’. Indeed, this is the profound stupidity of much of the ‘leftist’ bottomfeeders. Even though the West is really ruled by the financial crooks on Wall Street and degenerate homo-imperialists, they think the real danger comes from ‘nazis’, ‘kkk’, and ‘alt right'(which, as yet, is still a nascent movement, if it can be called a movement. The media promoted the ‘alt right’ in collusion with the Clinton campaign to smear Trump with it. Hillary’s speech on the ‘alt right’ was a giveaway that the media had been making a big stink about the AR for a purpose. Now that their ploy failed with the victory of Trump, the media are now scrambling to crush the Alt Right as fast as possible by having people punch ‘nazis’).

    The End of History is the End of Shame and the Beginning of Nihilism.

    Or, it’s about Inversion of Shame. In the Current Year, defending true marriage from degenerates is shameful while ‘gay marriage’ is ‘pride’. In the Current Year, a woman who opts for love, courtship, and marriage ought to be ashamed while skanks should flaunt their ‘slut pride’.

  5. Gubbler Chechenova 9 February, 2017 at 21:12 Reply

    On the matter of the GLOB and the Proglodytes.

    I think we should make a distinction between the Syndicalists and Cynicalists.

    In the end, Syndicalists turn into Cynicalists if they win. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

    Or Cynicalists attach themselves to every movement. They either ride it to victory and manipulate it OR they appropriate it to control it for their own interests.

    Take BLM. We know that Jewish elites don’t like black violence and thuggery. We know that they know the REAL problem with blacks is aggression, crime, and lunacy.

    BUT, Jewish elites still see white gentiles as their main rivals for power, and therefore, Jews seek to paralyze white pride and unity. This is done by ‘guilt-baiting’ whites about Jimmy Crow and Slavery. And so, Jews maintain the fiction that blacks are still oppressed by ‘racist whites’. And that is why Jews supported BLM even though, deep down inside, Jews know that black violence is the #1 threat to cities, the foundation of Jewish power. So, much of Jewish ‘leftism’ is really Cynicalist.

    There was once a time when many Jews were in the working class or even worse. Plenty of Eastern European Jews living under the Russian yoke were desperately poor, not least due to high birthrates. And even many Jewish merchants were peddlers and others who were just eking out a living. Back then, we can understand why a bunch of Jews were genuinely into Marxism, anarcho-syndicalism, and etc.

    But today, the last thing that Jews want is a bunch of angry mobs with class consciousness taking from the rich to give to the poor. The rich would be the Jews.

    So, much of Jewish ‘leftism’ has turned Cynical-ist.

    ‘Leftism’ is a broad category, and it can be just about anything depending on who gets to write its codes. Calling something ‘leftist’ is like calling something a search engine. Who gets to write algorithm for the software? Google writes its in a way that favors certain sites over others. Surely, search engines work differently China. Try looking up anything about Tiananmen Incident there.

    To be sure, one could argue that ‘leftism’ is broadly about equality and universalism. But there are so many ways to define ‘equality’ and ‘universalism’.

    When Vietnamese fought to drive out foreigners and create a homogeneous national state, that was called ‘leftism’. In that case, leftism was nativist and anti-invasivist.

    But in the case of France, we have a ‘leftism’ that calls for invasivism and displacement of native folks.

    Is ‘multi-culturalism’ leftist? Some may say so, but others would argue it is ‘rightist’ because, for example, it allows Muslims in Europe to maintain their reactionary and arch-traditional value systems and habits. Indeed, we often have the so-called Right in Europe making the ‘leftist’-seeming argument that Islam must be banned because it is too reactionary and ‘tribalist’.

    And just how did Jewish ‘liberals’ and ‘progressives’ make peace with Zionism that is fiercely nationalist and tribalist?

    We need a fascist theory of politics and history because, all said and done, it’s really about the Power, especially among the intelligent. While dummies may earnestly and stupidly believe what’s been crammed into their heads, People of Intelligence are too smart to fall for all the highfalutin politico-babble. Rather, they manipulate such rhetoric to gain power. It’s like Stalin really knew that all the official rhetoric was a cynical ploy to concentrate all the power in his hands. And Mao knew that the Cultural Revolution was a power struggle between himself and his perceived rivals. It was the dummies, the Red Guards, who swallowed the rhetoric hook, line, and sinker. And when they got out of hand, Mao decided to come up with a new idea and send them to the countryside where they couldn’t make so much trouble.

    Recently, look how all those Jewish ‘progressives’ pretend to care about all those ‘refugees’ as they invoke the Statue of Liberty. But they’d been utterly silent when Obama, at the behest of Zionists, pushed a foreign policy that turned Middle East into a hellhole and reduced people into refugees. So, ‘leftism’ depends on partisanism and who-gets-to-control-the-contextual-narrative. Jewish progs leave out the stuff about Obama’s wars and focus ONLY on sympathy for those ‘poor huddle refugees’. It’s pure Cynicalism.

    Because we don’t have a fascist theoretics of power, we have too many people acting in naive sincere-ist mode. They don’t know that they are a bunch of dupes who are easily swayed this way and that. They don’t know why they are made to feel so righteous and impassioned about certain things than others. There was a time when the Left associated homo culture with capitalist excess and decadence. So, how did the new ‘left’ become so homopathic and homomaniacal? Isn’t it because many of the former leftists got rich and became addicted to wealth and power? This was true esp with Jews. With Jews having so much dough and privilege, why would they feel much affinity with the working class who make Labor troubles that undermine Wall Street and urban rich class? Why not favor the homos who, btw, are also useful for gentrifying cities of them pesky Negroes? So, a bunch of vain, egotistical, narcissistic, self-indulgent, and neo-aristocratic whoopsy-doers became the #1 face of ‘leftism’.

    It was part of the Cynicalism of Power, but so many people fell for it because they are dumb.

    Americans are still naive and easily duped because they begin with ideas, ideals, and rhetoric. They don’t begin with the Power. They aren’t Machiavellians.

    Now, it may be that even the powerful actually believe in the bogus crap that they peddle. Consciously, people can easily dupe themselves… but subconsciously, of course, they are driven by power. Bill Gates acts like Mr. Humanitarian, but how did he amass all that fortune? He was one of the most ruthless and cunning monopoly-capitalists that ever lived, that’s why. And Soros acts like he’s Mr. Progressive, but what really animates and drives him? He loves to play the money game to win. And he supports ‘progressivism’ to weaken and break down national barriers so that his ilk can penetrate markets and manipulate currencies.

    What we need is a magazine called THE POWER. Before it discusses politics, ideologies, rhetoric, and partisan talking points, it would focus on the personality, ethnicity, economics, and mechanics of Power. Its perspective would begin with the notion that people(at least those with talent, vision, and etc) are driven by Will to Power.

    This isn’t to say ideologies and values aren’t important. They do shape, limit, and direct the ways in which power manifests itself. Surely, power flows and grows differently in Saudi Arabia, Cuba, North Korea, South Africa, Brazil, Israel, Germany, and the United States. Given the founding principles of Israel, one is advantaged in power by invoking blood and soil. Given the guilt-ideology of Germany, it is fatal for any politician to invoke blood and soil. Still, whatever the ideologies or societal limits, the fact is all peoples of all nations want the power, and the Power is their main goal than serving some ideology. Anyone who thinks that knaves like Rahm Emanuel, Barack Obama, Lindsey Graham, or Paul Ryan are about ideology first and power second is a fool.

    While it’s true that some men of power are more idealistic and more principled than others, they all want the thrill of power. Trump is a strange case because he’s been one of the most cynical businessmen of all time. Yet, he ran a campaign that pissed off both parties, and in office, he’s done things that offended the powers that be that are trying to destroy him. Why would Trump do this?

    Anyway, if we are to understand the psychology of those who have power over us politically, economically, and culturally, we need to probe into the part of the brain that is power-obsessed. Granted, except for gangsters and thugs, people are not ONLY FOR POWER. Power for power sounds too much like prostitution, orgy, or porny stuff. Just like people ideally want to associate sex with love and devotion, people want to associate power with ideals and cause. But the nature of globalism is to pornographize power. Is it any wonder that so much of current political culture is about homo anus and pussy-hats or vagina monologue or pussy riot?

    Sex used to be justified in relation to love and marriage. No longer. It is flaunted and indulged in as pleasure for its own sake.

    We haven’t gone that way with Power yet, at least not fully. But after the End of the Cold War, so much of what has happened has been about naked power grab and indulgence. Consider the Jewish oligarchic looting of Russia. Look at Wall Street predatory behavior and how it got away with bailouts. Look at all those gratuitous wars in the Middle East to serve Israeli supremacism and bankers. Look at the rotten behavior of the Chinese Rich and Russian oligarchs who’d rather invest their money in mega-rich condos in NY or real estate in Canada or California. Look how whore politicians like Trudeau ignores his own countrymen while sucking up to rich oligarchs from China, Gulf States, and etc.

    Power too is turning porny. More and more, as the culture grows shameless, we are seeing power for power’s sake, like in the Ridley Scott movie THE COUNSELOR.

    But unlike sex, naked power is still officially repressed or dressed up in ‘righteous’ feathers, and the globalist elites pretend that they are for justice and sound values. But this charade was blow up in the Hillary campaign. Here she was sucking up to every oligarch from Israel, Saudi Arabia, China, and Wall Street. Here she was being so cozy with the War Machine. Here she was rubbing shoulders with the self-indulgent and piggish celebs of Hollywood and music industry. Yet, she was supposed to be about decency and sound values. Enough Americans woke up and didn’t buy it. What they saw the pornography of power masquerading as morality. The reason why WOLF OF WALL STREET was a big hit was not cuz of its moralism. If anything, it was a porny celebration of power. Oliver Stone’s WALL STREET was plenty sensational too and Gekko became a cool anti-hero to many. Still, there was still a sense of right and wrong, a sense of shame on the part of Sheen character when he gets caught. But in WOLF OF WALL STREET, there is no shame. It’s the game of power all the way.

    Fascist theoretics would make us aware of that because it would probe into the power-psychology of the elites. END OF HISTORY is THE BEGINNING OF PORNOGRAPHY OF POWER.

    Now, fascism is NOT about the indulgence of power for power’s sake. Rather, it is an understanding of what the Power really is and understanding the relations of power among the various classes and between the sexes. Once that is understood, fascism tries to find a most sane, sound, and moral way to coordinate those powers and arrive at a moral unity. For there to be true morality, there has to be an honest understanding of truth.

    Mussolini and esp Hitler did a bad job with this — though they were right about some key things — , but failure doesn’t mean we shouldn’t try again. After all, there were many failures in the space program before a rocket was finally launched into space.


  6. Marathon-Youth 9 February, 2017 at 18:32 Reply

    A liberal to an Arab:
    “I am a self hating Gay Jew. Could you please throw me off a roof, Oi Vey?”
    A liberal Feminist to an Arab:
    “Could you castrate my daughter so she could be a lunatic liberal like me?”
    A liberal Masochist black to an Arab:
    “Them white folk hate me, but you folk hate me more. I like that. Just wop my Negro Ass and I will hold onto your beard Mustafa”

    • TransPride 12 February, 2017 at 22:35 Reply

      It’s them fleeing. Scared for their lives. Many also come here and sacrarfice being away from their families to work and send money back to their poor families, because in Mexico there are no jobs to take. How about getting all the facts first before spewing lies

        • TransPride 13 February, 2017 at 14:14 Reply

          If I had the money I would be in Mexico helping. I have sent money to organizations to help poor Mexican families before though, more than you are doing I am sure. And the solution isn’t oh just help them in Mexico and still don’t let them here. Years of government intervention couldn’t fix some of the poorer parts of Mexico, get rid of gangs, poverty, and the fact that the have so few jobs it is impossible to find work unless it is crime, which unfortunately some default to just to be able to feed their families and mall children. Why not let them come here legally or on Visa to work . We have plenty of open jobs. And no they are not stealing them from us, they are taking the jobs lazy Americans don’t want in the first place.

      • Jessica 14 February, 2017 at 20:51 Reply

        Who cares about the situation in Mexico? They should stay there and build up their own country. They need to have their own revolution in Mexico and stop being PARASITIC.

    • Zaphod Braden 9 February, 2017 at 17:26 Reply

      “The Holocaust is the Holy Grail of white guilt.” You should feel guilty for what THEY invented.
      The Jews BRAG about and SELF DOCUMENT THEIR “holocausting” others and then “PLACE A YOKE” on Gentiles for SUPPOSEDLY doing the exact same thing to them.
      FUNNY that everything they claim the nazis did is an EXACT COPY of their own book..
      Deuteronomy 7:16, 20:16 “And thou shalt consume all the peoples which the Lord thy God shall deliver unto thee; thine eye shall not pity them…thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth.”

      Numbers c.5 v.2-4
      Leviticus c.20 v.13 well, really the whole chapter
      Exodus c.32 v.27
      Numbers c.11 v.1-2
      Numbers c.16 all
      Numbers c.21 v.5-6
      Numbers v.26 v.10
      KILL anyone who engages in “DIVERSITY” or “INTEGRATION”
      Numbers v25 v.4-8
      Deuteronomy c.14 v.2
      SEXUALLY ENSLAVE any females “who have not KNOWN a man”
      a very brief selection, many more in THEIR book.
      Numbers c.21 v.03 Canaanites
      Numbers c.21 v.24 Amorites
      Numbers c.21 v.33-35 Bashan
      Numbers c.31 all Midianites
      Numbers c.32 v. more Amorites
      Deuteronomy c.2 v.34 People of Heshbon
      Deuteronomy c.3 v.6 really the whole chapter. threescore cities
      Joshua c.12 A list of victims of Israeli GENOCIDE
      Numbers c.21 v.25
      Numbers c.32 v.39
      Numbers c.33 v.53
      (just to name a FEW)
      Numbers c.33 v.31-34
      Deuteronomy c.7 v.2
      Deuteronomy c.12 v.28-30
      Deuteronomy c.20 v.11-16
      Deuteronomy c.2 v.2
      Deuteronomy c.7 v.1
      Jews SELF-anointed “The CHOSEN People of GOD”
      Nazis SELF-anointed “The CHOSEN People of GENETICS”.
      TODAY Israel states that it is creating “A PURE Jewish State”
      YESTERDAY the Nazis were creating “A PURE German State”
      And they utterly destroyed all that was in the city, both man and woman, young and old, and ox, and sheep, and ass, with the edge of the sword . . . (Joshua 6:21)
      For modern day reinforcement of these “rules” research/google “the KINGS TORAH”

  7. BoboBell 9 February, 2017 at 11:21 Reply

    The ideas which built America were not formed overnight but in centuries of thought and experimentation. A people who have never undergone this birthing process have no concept of what it takes to forge a nation out of nothing but will and determination. Mexico has no heritage of that sort and thus lacks the spirit, drive and will to make of themselves any more than collections of people living in a land they can never tame or conform. Transplanting that mindset to America does not instantly elevate them to appreciate American culture, society or the benefits which came from the long birthing process. They come as children; ignorant and ill fit, resistant to assimilation because they are frightened and run from it. In the end, by sheer numbers, they will not adapt but will transform America into the only home they have ever known and feel the most secure. A backwards, stagnant place where survival, not thriving, becomes the main objective.

  8. Marathon-Youth 9 February, 2017 at 11:16 Reply

    The liberals are for an open border, Amnesty and the “Dream Act”. They stand united against a solid wall, immigration regulations and President Trump.

    They have the full backing of the Main Stream Media, Internet companies like Facebook and Hollywood. Knowing that means we will be bombarded by anti Wall, anti Trump messages by the Main Stream Media, Facebook and Hollywood.

  9. rick rage 9 February, 2017 at 07:54 Reply

    jewish ad agencies knocking themselves out to flood the US and Europe and genocide us. they are committing crimes now that none of us will EVER forget. EVER!

  10. Rocketmensch 9 February, 2017 at 06:22 Reply

    I actually know people that felt good and morally superior for having products by 84 Lumber due to this commercial. Unbelievably disgusting. And yes, theses are vile people IRL despite believing they are morally virtuous huwhite goys

  11. Jarod 9 February, 2017 at 02:17 Reply

    Whenever liberals create propaganda about immigrants, it’s ALWAYS women and children. They dare not show the reality of mass MALE invasions.

  12. Gubbler Chechenova 8 February, 2017 at 18:50 Reply

    I think, in a way, we’ve arrived at a crossroads where we must make hard choices.

    In a way, the progs have a point.

    Free speech is easiest to accommodate when it is mostly harmless and inconsequential.

    Suppose there is a very stable and strong society, and there are anarchists, nazis, satan worshipers, communists, punks, and bunch of other radicals.

    So, it doesn’t matter what they say. Society can indulge in free speech since it’s all just noise and hum.

    In a stable capitalist democracy, who cares what a communist says on top of a soap box? Some will look at him with amusement or curiosity, and that’s about it.

    But suppose the social order is weak and frayed, and suppose 25% of the people have strong communist sympathies. Then, free speech for communists can be very dangerous.

    This is why Latin American nations were far more ruthless with commies than the US was. There was little chance of commies taking power in the USA. But esp after Castro’s victory in Cuba, many Latin American nations were shi**ing bricks cuz lots of poor folks might go with Marxist guerrillas. US understood this and supported the juntas.

    So, free speech is most tolerable when it is most inconsequential.

    A stable democracy will tolerate lots of different speech — nazi talk to nation of islam to anarchism — since all such talk won’t amount to plate of beans. Most Americans will not go Nazi, and most blacks will not join Nation of Islam and start a race war.

    (Indeed, the failure to counter the increasingly potent Speech of Jewish Power was why America changed so fast and furiously. Jews know their power multiplied exponentially through unopposed speech and narrative, and this shift in power had momentous impact on the US. So, they naturally don’t want any side to gain credence and power through similar instrument of speech.)

    Granted, even a stable social order may clamp down on free speech if the elites have been taken over by radical ideology. We saw this in Canada. There was no chance of Nazis coming to power in Canada. So, why did PC become so crazy over there in such a safe and stable society? Because globo-radicals gained power in the institutions. And radicals must push their agenda into every nook and cranny of society and purge any idea that is at odds with their own. Also, in order for radicals(who wormed into elite centers of power) to push through their agenda(designed to fundamentally change society), they must preempt any possible opposition with a dominant narrative. Canada was once almost all-white, and many Canadians wanted to keep it that way. Under such circumstances, call for massive immigration would have been opposed by people and politicians. So, the radicals used power of media and academia to condition as many people as possible — esp the young ones — that there are Nazis all over and that Canada is ‘racist’ cuz it’s too white, and it mus have Diversity and if you oppose it, you’re a ‘nazi’. Once hearts and minds were turned that way, the globo-radicals could push for mass immigration without much of an opposition. Many Canadians will have been won over to Diversity Cult and even those who still opposed it didn’t dare speak out against it since doing so might be deemed ‘racist’ and ‘nazi’.

    In the US, neo-nazis and KKK became utterly inconsequential. There had to be invented as they could hardly be found. The freakout at Oberlin over KKK sighting for example. But most of these ‘hate’ sightings turned out to be ‘hate hoaxes’ or hate-hallucinations of psykkkedelia on the lookout for Hateful Dead.

    Meanwhile, the prog radicals took over all institutions and even publicity departments of industries, and they began to infuse everything with PC. So, even Archie’s Comics had a story where Archie takes a bullet for a homo senator. Superhero comic books are now about homos and blacks. And this became the norm.

    BUT, the rise of Trump and the emergence of Alt Right changed everything. Before Trump and AR, it didn’t matter which party won. The Hegemonic Narrative remained constant. The most ‘right-wing” this country could go was ‘compassionate conservatism’ or cuckservatism of Jeb Bush and McCain praising illegals.

    The most ‘right-wing’ that US intellectuals could go was libertarianism and rooting for US wars overseas.

    It was totally taboo to speak of white interests or even to suggest it implicitly. Or to talk of Jewish Power and the race factor in society.

    Whites had to keep their heads down and never be uppity. Never look massuh in the eye. Whites had to accept that the Narrative that they suck and must repent.

    But Trump won the presidency by deriding all that. Even his disavowal of David Duke was perfunctory than on-his-knees-begging-forgiveness.

    Also, if neo-nazis and KKK had been useful to PC(just as Westboro church was) in caricaturing the White Right as a bunch of lunatics and morons, the Alt Right didn’t conform to Proglob stereotypes of ‘white rightists’. Alt Right challenged & changed the media image of the ‘far right. It offered honest critique of the Real Power America.

    THIS is a real threat to PC. In a way, real neo-nazism and KKK rhetoric was never threatening to PC since it was self-negating. Daytime Talk Shows used to invite neo-nazi and KKK morons and have them talk garbage and make total fools of themselves.

    But Alt Right didn’t fall into that trap. And unlike David Duke who, at one time, was with the Klan, most AR guys have no such baggage.

    So, Alt Right has a real chance of making a difference in contributing to the Narrative. It is the most potently anti-PC force out there.

    And this is why Free Speech is now so dangerous. It’s not because of the Neo-Nazis and KKK but the Truth that is emerging due to internet as the alternative forum of ideas, a sanctuary of truth against PC floodwater.

    Free Speech has become consequential once again. Neo-Nazis and KKK trash-talk only validated PC by confirming all the negative proggy stereotypes of the far-right movement. But Alt Right won’t play by that script, and the PC forces don’t know what to do.

    Though Trump isn’t AR(by any stretch of imagination), his brazen attitude is an inspiration to all whites to stop groveling and keeping their heads bowed. And once whites begin to think freely and of their own interests, many of them will naturally come to agree with AR views.

    And that means a real challenge to the PC consensus that has defined America for so long.

    So, ‘Punch a Nazi’ really means “slander those who tell the truth as a nazi”. All the easier to attack them and silence them.

    But we should welcome ‘nazi punching’ because it will be even more ‘red-pilling’.

    It’s been said a ‘conservative is a liberal who’s been mugged’.

    Then, an Alt Rightist will be a conservative who has been punched.

    Anyway, most Rightist talk was, more or less, tolerated until now because it was either inane & spineless or crazy & demented. Neocons were all about Israel, Cucks were all about ‘compassionate conservatism’, and Neo-Nazis & KKK were about deranged stupidity. Neocons and Cucks served the globalist-establishment and the Neo-Nazis & KKK were too cartoonish to take seriously.

    But some on the Alt Right are the vanguard of a fresh, honest, courageous, and new ways to look at history and society. And Alt Right boils down the Power as essentially Jewish & Homo GLOB and PC-programmed prog-dummies.

    So, the other side is panicking and declared Fatwa to punch more ‘nazis’, which means any Trump supporter. Most of these Trumpers are moderate conservatives, but once they or their friends or family members are punched, they will join the Alt Right.

    ‘Red-pilling’ is mild stuff compared to ‘Nazi-punching’. That will, for sure, turn people to the AR.

  13. Albionic American 8 February, 2017 at 17:49 Reply

    And then show the little girl 30 years later, all grown up and ruling the country as Literally Hitler, using the nation’s resources to terrorize the world.

    Hey, immigration from Austria to Germany worked wonders for the original Hitler’s self-actualization.

    • Zaphod Braden 9 February, 2017 at 17:28 Reply

      I believe being aware of World events was what did it.. ……..
      The Jews play the game of “what did WE do????”
      The European People saw what was being done to the CHRISTIAN Ukranian/Russian People by the Bolsevick Jews, even though Americans never pay attention to what is going on. Do you think the actions of the JEWISH Bolseviks just might have influenced Hitler’s view of Jews. He did not “hate them for NO REASON” These crimes happened as Hitler was climbing the ladder and he KNEW what the Jews were doing to Christians, unlike America where Jewish Bolsevik actions were NOT REPORTED.
      HOLODOMOR : The famine-genocide of Ukraine, 1932-1933. In June of 1933, at the height of The Holodomor, 28,000 men, women and children in Ukraine were dying each day. The intentions were clear, genocide of the CHRISTIAN peasants. Holodomor is the name given to the mass starvation in the Ukrainian Famine of 1932-33. Occurring between the Russian Revolution and the Second World War …
      The Great Purge under Stalin 1937-38. … the Great Purge encompassed the entire Soviet Union and all categories of people. Out of 388 members of the new revolutionary government in Russia, only sixteen were real Russians. “Apart from one negro,” we are told, “the rest were Jews.”
      Of the 502 highest officers of the 1917 First Soviet Socialist Government, 467 were Jews. Alexandr Solzenitzyn writes in his last book on the history of Russia that the Jews murdered over 66 million Russians. Marx, Engels, Trotsky, Bakunum, Lenin, Stalin, Kruschev, and others were all Jews by two or at least one parent. All the prison camps, torture chambers, gulags, etc were all commanded and run by Jews.
      The Jews’ 1933 declaration of war on Germany was no mere bluff or empty threat. Jews were an active internal enemy. At home, alert Germans had already seen the bloody Jewish revolution of 1918-1919 that installed the secessionist Judeo-Communist Bavarian Soviet Republic. While Germany was trying to fight World War 1, subversive Jewish revolutionaries like Kurt Eisner, Gustav Landauer, Ernst Toller, and Eugen Leviné were murdering innocent Germans at home. By the time the Jews formally declared war on Germany in 1933, Germans had already seen millions die in the Jewish-led-and-funded Communist revolutions of the early twentieth century in Russia, Hungary, Bavaria, and elsewhere in Europe. There was a holocaust of over 60 million at the hands of Judeo-Bolshevism.