The bannings from online platforms are only going to get worse. I’ve been banned from pretty much every platform for satirizing Jews and making people wise to the JQ by impersonating liberal Jews. Just today I had an account banned because I went through and counted the number of Jews off of Chuck Johnson’s GotNews release of the 231 people arrested for rioting at the Trump Inauguration. At least 30 of the Rioters were Jews. Surprise, surprise, GotNews is also down. Hasbara bots were littering the Disqus comments section of the GotNews DC rioter Name Drop saying the links for the names caused viruses.

Connecting the dots and reporting who was behind the Riots gets you banned, while threatening Richard Spencer with violence is acceptable.

Also, use a different platform than SoundCloud. They will ban all Alt Right people soon.

Join the fun on purge free Gab. Yes, I know the audience is a lot smaller — come help make it bigger.

Progs called conservatives ‘fascist’, and conservatives call progs ‘fascist’.

Yep, again and again, ‘fascist’ is used as some epithet or insult.

Why is everyone is anti-fascist? People on the left and people on the Right and people on the Top and people on the Bottom all call each other ‘fascist’.

So, elitism is fascism, populism is fascism, liberalism is fascism, conservatism is fascism, socialism is fascism, libertarinism is fascism. Everyone accuses the other side of being ‘fascist’, and everyone denies that his side is ‘fascist’.

In fact, I’m the only true fascist, and I think all of humanity should just call me FASCIST and be done with it.

Anyway, why is everyone so fearful of the term ‘fascism’? I think it’s because the truth is triggering. They fear and hate fascism because no ideology came so close to addressing the core essence of power. Is fascism dangerous? Yes. It’s like fire is dangerous. Electricity is dangerous. Nuclear power is dangerous. Things of great power and truth are dangerous. So, fascism is something we need to be careful with. It’s like the ring of power in Nibelungen. It’s like Excalibur. Mismanage it and you end up with WWII.

But just because something can be misused dangerously and disastrously doesn’t mean that its power is untrue. If anything, it means it is all too true. It’s like what Frankenstein learns of fire. It is good and bad and bad and good. But it is great power.

So, why are people so afraid of fascism? Because it gets to the CORE of what it’s all about: Power. Deep down inside, the Left must know this because it got obsessed with neo-Nietzscheanism via Foucault. It’s like APOCALYPSE NOW where Willard comes face to face with the true source of power as explained by Kurtz(though Coppola copped out and took out a lot of Kurtz’s philosophical musings about the power.)

Especially with the fading of Marxism, the Left needed to fixate on something new and compelling. With Leftism, the theme was Justice. Violence and struggle for justice and equality. A war on power to create a world of equality.

But eventually, the rhetoric changed to Power. Black Power, Brown Power, Gay Pride(a kind of power). EMPOWERMENT. Also, the Left came under the spell of capitalist egotism, celebrity, and megalomania. The Left came to admire Star Power, that of Elvis, Dylan, Beatles, Stones, Hendrix, the great Auteurs, and etc. It lost interest in the little guy, like in the film MARTY with Ernest Borgnine as ordinary Joe, a kind of Ralph Kramden with better temper.

The Counterculture was odd in its contradictions. On the one hand, young people found older people bigoted and repressive. They called for equality and liberation. But Liberation also meant the exultation of Star Power, the Icon, the Rocker as god, and etc. The older generation never revered pop stars like the boomers did theirs. Sure, the older folks love Sinatra and Como, but they weren’t about to wet their pants over them. And older generations respected presidents, but it was the boomers who had the myth of Camelot. The Counterculture was enthralled, enraptured, and eye-ball-popping about their pop heroes who were worshiped like gods. Deadheads worshiped Garcia. I saw them bawling like mad when he died. “Jerrrrrrrryyyy”!!!

Of course, this power-worship was nothing new in Leftism. The French Revolution led to the cult of Napoleon who was revered as a Promethean figure. And Marx came to be revered as modern Moses, and Lenin and Stalin became like gods to worship. And as Paul Johnson wrote in his book on 19th century, a lot of the 20th century obsessions began there. Wagner was like a god to many(though much of this wasn’t necessarily leftist.)

Still, the intellectual discipline and dogmatic rigor of Leftism demanded that leftists be good dutiful obedient commissars. Follow the Party, obey the Moscow Line, repress one’s egotism for the Working Man. Socialist Realism. Overt personal ambition or experimentalism was condemned as adventurism and formalism.

But the counterculture left became so into drugs, rock music, sex culture, and hedonism that it rebelled against both the Right and the Stalinist Left. And some took cues from Dylan who went electric. Images of Che and Mao were juxtaposed with those of rock stars and movie icons like Marlon Brando and James Dean. Charisma became a thing.

BONNIE & CLYDE was romanticized as a revolutionary movie even though it was about a glamour couple who went around shooting regular folks. Nihilism seeped into Leftism… or Leftism was breaking out of its repressed shell. Just as Victorianism repressed sexuality, Leftism repressed what the fight was really about. It was about Power, not justice and abstract ideals. Nietzsche had been right.

Of course, the post-Marxist Left continued to use the terminology of justice and equality against repression, tyranny, oppression, exploitation, privilege, and etc. But the more we look at it, it’s a naked struggle for power for power’s sake.

And this is why people fear fascism. Fascism was to power-politics what Freudianism was to politics of psychology. Freud may have overstated the case, but he believed that powerful subconscious and biological forces were flowing underneath consciousness with its pat morals and manners. Fascism said the core element of history and society is the struggle for power. History is a story of Power.

Marx would have admitted power is crucial to understanding history. But he thought this problem would be resolved, and utopia could finally result from dialectics of class struggle. History, according to Marx, is about the upper classes using their power to exploit the classes. This will eventually lead to capitalism that will eventually destroy itself but ONLY AFTER having created a giant industrial society full of wealth. When capitalism destroys itself, the workers shall inherit the wealth and share it equally and be happy and etc. So, in the end, Justice trumps everything in Marxist theory. In contrast, fascist theory says Power will always be the core theme of life. After all, we are organisms, and just look at nature. It is a never-ending struggle of survival and territory and advantage. It is about the use of power by various organisms to gain ground and survive. And every advantage has a disadvantage. Birds with wings can fly, but their upper limbs are useless for anything but flight. Snakes lack limbs but have poison. Since humans are organisms, they too struggle for power. This was made all the more evident by the discoveries of Darwin and Wallace.

Fascism did with history what physics did with matter. Fascism peered into the nuclei of history and found the struggle for power. This wouldn’t have been alarming to pagans such as Greeks, Romans, and Germanic barbarians who were familiar with the way of power. But the justice-heavy themes of Christianity and Islam that came to pervade much of the world were afraid to touch upon the true nature of man.

And the Enlightenment, though anti-religious, shared something with Christianity in its lofty view of mankind. Since mankind had brains that could reason, history could and should be about remaking society on the basis of the loftiest ‘ideals’. No wonder we still hear the elites yammer about ‘western values’. Now, there is surely a need for higher ideals, morality, reason, logic, and etc. But are they the core of life? Maybe if humans could be like the body-less spirits in 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY that travel across stars with their ‘thoughts’.

But in truth, humans are animals with bodies with all sorts of organs and material that developed before brains or along with brains. And organisms ensure survival and even supremacy by competition and game of power.

Now, if we only act on the basis of power, we’d be like apes or wolves or lions or hyenas, and who wants that? We do want morality and even spirituality and idealism, BUT, they are mere addendum to the organism-ism that is, at its core, about the will to live, will to survive, the will to power. Some animals act in terms of solitary power. Some act socially. Humans act macro-socially, but there are limits to scale of human interaction. It’s like a wolf pack. There’s a limit to the viability to a pack size. 10 wolves in a pack can work well. But 100 wolves in a pack wouldn’t function well, and it would naturally break into separate packs. Likewise, the viable limit for macro-social-organization seems to be the Nation. Empire tries to stretch beyond that, but all empires have failed and fallen apart and broken up into nations. Also, the nation is most stable with an overwhelming majority that allows unity and trust and cooperation. Sweden worked better as all-Swedish. It is falling apart with ‘diversity’ that is turning Sweden into a mini-empire of incompatible races and cultures.

Anyway, just as one could use Marxist theory to understand history without being a Marxist revolutionary or diehard communist, one could use Fascist theory to understand society and history without becoming a black shirt or brown shirt.

And the dirty secret of the Left is that, in a way, they’ve been doing this without even knowing it. Their emphasis on EMPOWERMENT is sub-fascist. Sure, they try to mask their power-obsession with rhetoric about White Privilege, i.e. blacks want black power because they are oppressed by white privilege. Or Jews obsess about Jewish issues ostensibly because of ‘Nazis’ and’anti-semites’. But such rationalization is specious because, in truth, blacks want power for power’s sake, and so do Jews. Power feels good. It’s like someone wants to be rich to be rich. The likes of Soros may argue that they made a ton of money just so they could do good works, but who’s kidding whom? Soros loves money for money’s sake. And his agendas all come down to empowering globalist oligarchs like himself by breaking down national barriers that stand in the way of globalist penetration. He’s not breaking down national barriers for the good of the masses. It’s for the power of globalist oligarchic class consisting of his ilk.

Rapper may bitch about the White Man, but their real theme is “I want the power, the ho, the dough, the bling, the ring.” And look at what the Russian communist elites did once communism fell. They tried to grab as much loot for themselves as possible. In a way, communism was less about justice than a game theory of power where politics would be shared so that no one would be the new tsar to hog it all.. but then Stalin came along and amassed all the power in the state, and then later, the insiders in the state gained most of the loot once the game theory of communism had run out of steam.

Fascism is difficult for people to face because they don’t want to peer into their souls and see the ‘real me’. They don’t want to find the Gordon Gekko who spells it all out. Now, fascism doesn’t say power alone is enough or that life should be about nihilistic greed and self-aggrandizement. It doesn’t praise the likes of Gekko. It doesn’t say everyone should try to be like Emperor Nero.

But then, Freud never said people should just take their clothes off, have massive orgies, and act like Lena Dunham. Rather, he was trying to come up with a healthier blueprint for a society that is founded on the truth of sexual drive as the essence of human nature.

In a similar vein, fascism says that society must be founded and managed on the understanding that humans are organisms in a struggle for power. Fascism says that the most potent kind of power among humans is social and national and racial. Radical individualism atomizes. Universalism is too confusing, too grandiose, too impossible. Also, identity is key to national unity and stability since it clarifies who is ‘us’ and who is ‘them’. This all works best on the national level.

Many point to Italian Fascism and National Socialism as proof of fascism’s failure, but the great paradox is that they failed by violating fascist principles. Both began to overstep national interests and went into imperialist mode, thereby raising the ire of other competing tribes.

Fascism is a theory of how to interweave the various elements of society and humanity to arrive at maximum power and survivality for the race or species. Fascism rejects dogmatic conservatism and traditionalism that sticks only to conventions and received wisdom. After all, science taught us that new things will be discovered, and history never remains the same. Fascism rejects radical leftism that fixates on narrow definition of ‘justice’ and ‘equality’ as the end all of history when history will always be a struggle for power. Also, a fascist will say leftists are merely repressed fascists whose repressed will-to-power emerges as moral supremacism and virtue-signaling. We see that in Sweden’s conceit of itself as a ‘humanitarian superpower’.

Why are young ones really attracted to punk music culture? Because of nice themes of justice and equality and being nice to fellow men? No, they are drawn to the display of power, rage, and machismo. Punk’s ‘garage marxism’ is useful for justifying what they REALLY want: sense of empowerment and badassness. If antifa types really care for the little people, they should be volunteering to take care of the elderly and lonely. Instead, they indulge in macho-power-thuggery and lamely try to justify their penchant for brutality by invoking ‘justice’.

If the Age of Reason/Enlightenment was overly optimistic about the power of reason as the lofty guide to future history, the Romantic Era was overly optimistic about the power of the irrational. In some ways, Romanticism is a precursor to fascist thinking because it addressed the power of emotions and the sublime blend of animal passion and spiritual transcendence(like in the Christo-Pagan music of Wagner), but its obsession with beauty and poetics prevented it from delving into the true dark soul of the human organism. It overly idealized and aestheticized the irrational.

Even the dark novel of FRANKENSTEIN was rather rhapsodic about this ungodly power. Fascism that emerged in the 20th century used the power of reason to delve into the power of unreason. It was a rational undertaking to understand the dynamics of the irrational soul of man; and mankind will remain mainly irrational(and the GLOB and Progs operate on this basis since they are invested in manipulating people with images and sounds than persuading them with reason and logical arguments. Why should we have ‘gay marriage’. Oh, look at those colorful ‘rainbow’ flags. Aren’t they lovely? One would have to be a ‘hateful homophobe’ to not get on the homo bandwagon and sing along to Village People”).

Just like a Freudian begins the discussion on the basis that ‘you wanna do it’, the fascist theorist begins on the basis that “you want the power”(or wanna be associated with the power). A fascist would be like Mel Brooks in this scene except talking about power than sex:

The ‘leftist’ GLOB and Progs are so full of shi*. According to their professed logic, they don’t want the power, or at least not an excess of it. They say everyone should have a fair portion of power and no more, and this goes for themselves too. They are into ‘equality’. Yeah, that must be why George Clooney wants more and more. Or why Bono can’t wait to get his hands on millions more. That must be why Oprah is worth billions. That must be why Hollywood is into raking in more and more. And that George Lucas the Libby Dib. He’s been telling us that he has yet to make his Personal Films because he has to make money first. But 100 million isn’t enough, 500 million isn’t enough, 2 billion isn’t enough. and 5 billion isn’t enough. I’m not saying those who want lots of money and power are ‘fascist’, but only fascist theory understands what they are really about.

Why is it that those who yammer about ‘equality’ never want to be part of the working class? If given a chance between being a starving artist and gluttonous pig, they almost always choose the latter. And Obama is likely to cash in big just like the Clintons. I wonder how much of his wealth he will invest in the ghettos of Detroit or give to poor Africans. All their ‘progressive’ talk is just that. Talk. What they really want is power. They want it and when they get some, they want more and more, like a Wall Street tycoon with 10 billion want 20 billion and then 50 billion.

As for the ‘leftist’ ‘losers’ who aint got much and don’t have a chance of getting any, notice they prefer to hang around rich cities and live off crumbs. If they really care about the have-nots, why not go to some depressed town and try to do good work? No, they wanna be ‘creative’ and leech off places that has the dough, status, prestige, and glamour. (Bernie-Sanderism is appealing to y0ung progs not because it offers equality but promises privilege of doing whatever and being funded by the state. Sanders’ Kids want the state to pay for their tuition even if they major in the most useless studies. It’s the privilege/power of being spoiled brats that attracts them to Sanders.) Also, it’s interesting how these ‘leftists’ have as heroes and role models the rich, the famous, the popular, the glamorous, and etc. I mean when did you ever see a ‘leftist loser’ bitch that Springsteen or Jay-Z is too rich? Which Libby-dib ever complained that Oprah is too rich? Oh, they will say, the fact that a black woman can be so rich sends a positive message, right? What? That one black woman should hog so much while so many black women got nothing? Some ‘leftism’.

If ‘leftists’ are all about concern for the powerless and ‘little people’, why are they so obsessed with famous movie stars, rock stars, rich athletes, and celebrities? Why did all those pussy-hatters have to stand there mesmerized at madonna’s narcissistic speech? Surely anyone with sense knows madonna and ashley judd are soul-damaged morons… but wait!! They are famous people, so they must be ‘cool’, and that means they must be right and worth listening to. So much for equality and concern for ‘little people’. They’d rather listen to the egotistical vanity of rich bitches with entitlementality.

What’s the name of the song at the beginning and end?

Time to infiltrate Antifa?

People misunderstand fascism because only a few nations have been Open Fascist nations. Italy called itself ‘fascist’ cuz it invented the term. Nazis went with ‘National Socialism’, but it could be said a variant of fascism. Franco was allied with fascists but not really fascist. Peron’s was a milder form of fascism, a kind of left-fascism.

Anyway, because Germany and Italy lost big in WWII, it’s assumed fascism was defeated. But there has been closed, hidden, and subsumed fascisms all over. But people don’t want to discuss this because it would bring us to the closer to the truth of history.

Take Israel. It is a fascist-democracy, and it goes to show that fascist themes and democracy can go well-together. Israel is about race, culture, history, and heritage of Jews. Its military culture is spartan and tough. It is about us and them. But it is also democratic. If anything, it goes to show that fascist themes and democracy actually work well together. If Israel were multi-culti in outlook and had a growing Muslim and Hindu population that threatened to outnumber the Jews, its democracy would be harder to sustain. Democracy is possible in Israel because of unity of Jews.

And indeed, democracy flourished most in nations with ideal fascist settings. Now, when I say Ideal Fascist Setting, I don’t mean that the people are necessarily fascist-minded. Suppose there is an island of only Swedes. Suppose all these Swedes are multi-culti cosmopolitans. So, they want massive immigration and wanna be minorities in their own islands. So, they are not fascist in thought. Still, let’s say the island, for the time being, is safe, secure, rich, and decent with only Swedish people. Why? Because it has Ideal Fascist Setting of unity, homogeneity, and work ethic(developed under culture of discipline and restraint over the long Protestanty winters). It’s like Madison Wisc is very proggy in outlook. But its white areas are very nice, safe, and secure. Why? Because of the proggy outlook OR because of its Ideal Fascist Setting? The nice parts of Madison are white and filled with Germanic folks. So, even if these people have proggy outlook, they are living in a world of Germanic habits, manners, and work ethic. They are living in an Ideal Fascist Setting.

In contrast, suppose there’s a nation that is 40% black, 40% Muslim, and 20% white. Suppose everyone were to read Mussolin’s DOCTRINE OF FASCISM and agree with fascism. But the setting would not be Ideal by fascist ideals. Too many wild and aggressive blacks, too many nutty Muslims, and too many whites scared of their wits.

So, a setting that is ideally fascist but filled with proggy people work better than a setting that is multi-culti & diverse but is fascist.

Now, look at China under Maoist-leftism and China under defacto-fascism. Since Deng Era, China has essentially been about mixed economy of capitalism and socialism, mixed culture of old and modern, and heavy emphasis on nationalism. Isn’t this model closer to fascism than to communism? What worked better? Maoism or this defacto fascism. But no one wants to use the term ‘fascism’ since it would state the obvious: fascism works.

Fascist Theories aren’t only about fascist societies or self-professed fascists. It is about a study of why certain societies work and why some don’t.

If we take Sweden, why did it work so well and why is it falling apart now?

Even though Sweden was never officially fascist, it had many Ideal Fascist Qualities. It was homogeneous and united. It combined socialism with capitalism. It was a society of sobriety, work ethic, and discipline. If it later turned more libertine, such freedom could be enjoyed PRECISELY BECAUSE Sweden was such a safe and stable place.

So, even if social-democrats of Sweden considered themselves as Marxist-lite and anti-fascist, the real reason why Sweden succeed owed to Ideal Fascist Elements.

It’s like a rich successful person may consider himself a Christo-Marxist and pretend that his success owes to his self-professed ideology. But the REAL reason for his success is high IQ, work ethic, individual ambition, and etc. So, despite what he SAYS, what made him SUCCEED was something closer to Ayn-Randism.

Because Nazism gave fascism such a bad name, nations like Sweden have been falling all over themselves to be as anti-fascist as possible, and what is the result? Deterioration and decline. Swedes have been taking a close look and trying to purge whatever is sub-fascist: Homogeneity, unity, sobriety, and hardness. The result is a nation of pansies run by women who let rapists and murderers in to gain approving nods from the GLOB.

Many successful or rising nations that call themselves non-fascist or even anti-fascist have some ideal fascist elements if we take a closer look. Because Russia fought a great war against officially fascist nations in WWII, Putin would never use that term positively. But whatever success he’s had owes to pro-fascist or profa themes. Nationalism, culture of morality, unity and discipline. Russians, being drunken bums, need a long way to go, but their only hope of success is a kind of intelligent and sober fascism even if they don’t call it that. In the end, a nation must be using all ideas to maximize its power and security, and fascism allows this because it is not a mono-ideology. And this is why Jews, even though most anti-fascist in their official pronouncements, are a very fascistic sort of people. Jews creatively combine various ideas and ideologies and shift from one position to another based on the premise of “Is it good for the Jews?”

And it’s all about the Power. People either want the power(the will to power) or want to be associated with power(will to cower). They want to command the field or cheer for the team that is on the field. Look at football or any sports. Spectators identify with their side and try to ‘share’ in the glory of the players.

Christians will claim to be anti-power, but fascistics is a part of Christianity. After all, it claims that Jesus was really the Son of God, therefore God Himself. If Christianity said Jesus was a very nice guy who had these shining ideals and died for them and that was that, would it have become a great religion? People would have said Jesus was a nice guy but helpless and weak. The real appeal of Christianity is that Jesus revealed Himself as the Son of God, the greatest power that be, and that vengeance is really with Him. So, He died for our sins out of great love, but He is waiting in Heaven to whup some serious butt of those who will burn for all eternity in the afterlife. That is Power.

And look at the appeal of all this homo stuff. Is it really about sympathy for these poor pitiful homos? No, homos have great appeal in globalism that is obsessed with status, riches, celebrity, and vanity because homos are associated with fashion, Hollywood, privilege, wealth, and power. Think of the costs involved to have those massive homo parades. It is the spectacle of power and riches that attracts people to homos. Suppose most homos were un-creative and poor and lived in trailers. Suppose they decided to throw a parade in their run-down dinky little town. How many politicians and celebrities and yuppies would show up?

Power is like an addiction, a drug. Antifa types are bottom-feeders in this. Being dumb, trashy, idiotic, impatient, or immature, they fail to do anything in life. So, their experience of power is anarchy. They watch stuff like V FOR VENDETTA or listen to RAGE AGAINST MACHINE and throw tantrums. They wanna FEEL the power cuz they got none. The fact that they even attack Starbucks shows that they are confused.

But those with IQ and talent don’t become antifa. They don’t go for bottom-feeding. They study, gain connections, attend Ivy League school, and serve in government and advise leaders to attack and destroy entire nations and populations, like in Iraq, Libya, Syria, Ukraine, and etc. They are Top-Bombers(hawks) than bottom-feeders(carps and crabs), and they do a lot more damage. And what is it really about? Sure, they invoke ‘human rights’ and ‘democracy’, but it’s really addiction to power, be it Zionist or American Imperialist.

Though fascism is seen as bad stuff — and there can be bad fascism as Hitler certainly proved — , I think we can have moral fascism if we identify and understand the true nature of power in the world. It’s like alcohol. It can make you do crazy stuff, and it can even kill you. But a glass of red wine a day is good for you. And a few beers never killed anyone. So, we need to be honest about alcohol, what it is and how it should be handled.

Censorship of fascist theoretics is like prohibition. Because alcohol did a lot of damage to society, a bunch of people decided to ban alcohol altogether, as if that will make it go away. But it only led to bootleg booze and organized crime. So, even though US was officially non-alcoholic, alcohol was all around underground. Eventually, the US came to its senses and acknowledged alcohol as part of what people want. The thing was to be honest about this and then have laws that best regulate the trade and use of alcohol.

Likewise, because of WWII, there’s been this suppression of honest discussion of fascism and race-ism; EVERYTHING associated with them was supposed to be irredeemably bad. They were condemned as ‘obsession with power’ and ‘supremacism’. So, officially anyway, we were told that history since end of WWII has been all about ‘equality’, ‘human rights’, ‘liberal democracy’, ‘tolerance’, and etc.

But in fact, just like alcohol went underground during the Prohibition, the power-obsession merely went underground. The Cold War was about the struggle for power and dominance than about ideology. After all, if it was all about ideology, why did the US become so aggressive after it won the Cold War? It should have welcomed the new peace and harmony. Because it loved the fact that it had the Supreme Power. It was like Madeline Albright saying that the US got all this power and might as well use it. For what? To spread ‘human rights’ by having 100,000s of Iraqi kids killed? If US is about equality and favoring the weak over the strong, why does it favor Israel over Palestinians? And if US is about secular values, why side with Saudi Arabia against secular modernizers like Assad? And why piss off Russia that is no longer an enemy and wants to get along with EU and the US? It’s all about the Power. Jewish globalists want to gain supremacy over Russian resources, and US military-industrial complex will jump on any excuse to flex its muscle and act tough.

Anyway, if we end the prohibition the Power Studies(fascist theoretics), we could better understand what is happening. It would become apparent that influential people who pretend to be sober with ideals of ‘human rights’ and ‘liberal democracy’ are actually intoxicated with Power Madness that ranges from Jewish Supremacism to Military-Industrial-Complex-mania.

And what is Fareed Zakaria really about? Why is he here? I mean if he wants to use his talent to help a nation, why the US that is rich already? India has many many more problems, and he could use his smarts there. So, why is he here? Is it really about his embrace of nice kindly globo ‘human rights’? Non, the punk wants the good life in the US, and also, he figures India can colonize the West with its rapidly expanding population. So, he’s not just some nice guy promoting tolerance but an agent of Hindu-Muslim-Indian Globo Colonization. He may rinse his mouth with the ‘human rights’ mouthwash, but his stomach is filled with Power Moonshine.

And this thing with the Megaphone and Gag Order. (Or MAGAG order since Trumpers are supposed to shut up.) Why are certain people given megaphones while others are gagged? Where is freedom of speech or equal opportunity of expression? ‘Hate Speech Laws’ are supposed to be about protecting the powerless from the powerful, but it’s really about protecting the powerful(especially Jewish elites) from the relatively powerless.

Best way to deal with alcoholism is to state the fact that someone has an alcohol problem. Only by stating that fact can the person learn to see what his problem is and learn to drink responsibly. Refusal to admit the problem makes the problem worse because he will pretend he has no problem while sneaking drinks all throughout the day.

Similarly, the best way to control fascism as a moral ideology and instrument is to admit that the world is driven by competition for power and the natural organismic drive for supremacy. Every organism is ‘supremacist’ in that it seeks to gain more and more. Plants spread seeds all over and try to take over the entire field. Wolf pack tries to gain fresh territory. Mosquitoes breed like crazy and fill the air with bloodsuckers that try to suck everything. Bacteria try to spread as much as possible. So, nature is a world of competing supremacisms.

Humans are the same way as all of human history has been about gaining dominance by invasion, trade, ideas, religion, etc. By admitting this aspect of human nature, we can control it better by coming to an understanding that all groups have this Will to Power even if they don’t admit it. (Hitler was honest in stating what his ideology was all about. It was about the Power. And he was honest about what other great nations were about too. The Power and domination. This is why the Brits didn’t like him. Hitler’s admiration for British greatness made it plain as day that the empire was primarily about British domination than about Brits being noble carriers of the “white man’s burden” to enlighten the world. He understood and stated the true nature of imperialism. This made the Brits nervous since they always justified their domination over dark folks in terms of being generous and tolerant. In a way, Hitler and Jews agreed on this aspect of Anglo domination of the world. Anglos were really about Power and Domination. The difference is Hitler admired & praised it whereas Jewish leftists reviled & condemned it. Either way, it made the Anglos nervous because it lifted the veil of its moral justification for empire. But Hitler was bad fascist because of his utter contempt for much of humanity and failure to understand that other peoples have a will-to-power of their own that should be respected. Also, whether the Brits intended to or not, they were spreading not only the light of civilization but the means-of-power to other peoples who learned from the Brits to gain power for themselves.) It’s not ultimately about some higher ideal but about the Power. Now, if we just act like animals, we will be fighting endless wars and that will lead to a big mess. Therefore, we must work towards building a responsible and moral fascist order where all sides respect one’s another’s need for core power and core security. We must declare the Age of Empire to be over and promote a world of secure nations that respect one another and trade with one another. Then, Nation A respects the will-to-power of Nation B and Nation C, and Nation B respects the will-to-power of Nation A and Nation C, and Nation C respects the will-to-power of Nation A and Nation B.

Let the will-to-power remain within national borders. Let Hungary be Hungary and let Poland be Poland. But Merkel the crazy globalist bitch decided to succumb to the Will to Power of disastrous globalism and then, by invoking ‘human rights’, denounced Hungary and Poland.

This is what happens when a people are unwilling to fess up to the fascist will-to-power. Germans, if they were to be honest, would say they want to survive and thrive as Germans in Germany. Ideally, Germans should seek Will-to-Power in Germany. This makes total sense since Germany is the land of Germans. But because Germany isn’t allowed to realize this, its repressed Will-to-Power seeks expression by something resembling Sweden’s ‘humanitarian super-power-ism’. Unlike Nazis who were for invading other nations, New Germany is about welcoming invasion and showing off their superior morals by being ‘good’, and then forcing this ‘goodness’ and ‘human rights’ on other nations like Hungary and Poland. It’s so crazy.

We need to be honest that all the world loves the alcohol of power. Only by admitting this fact can we honestly and soberly regulate this power and warn all the world to not get drunk on ‘medicine water’. Best way to do it is by promoting nationalism that limits the nation’s power within its borders and respects the will-to-power of other nations with their own national sovereignty.

Globalism is one big bootleg operation by gangsters like Soros who pretend to be providing the milk and cookies of human kindness to world while shipping the alcohol of power to fellow oligarchs around the world. Soros and his ilk hate nationalism because it erects walls against the bootleggers of globalist power-domination.