Perspective

Is Contemporary Christianity a Suicide Cult?

Although I’m not very religious, religion interests me, especially the current trajectory of Christianity in the West.  What I mean here is mainstream Christianity in the United States and Europe, not non-Western Christianity such as the rise of black or mestizo Christianity that one finds in the Global South nor the small pockets of Uncucked Christianity one might find.   The Christianity I’m referencing here is mainstream and practiced almost exclusively by white people:  We’ll call it Cucked Christianity.

As I and many others have noted, this Cucked Christianity is fast becoming a suicide cult. Here are some recent examples:

  • Christian cucks basically support the Third World immigration and refugee invasion of their own countries.  Literally.  Some of them even wear “Refugees Welcome” t-shirts and make SJWs look masculine.  Granted, some of them, like hustler Russell Moore whose Evangelical Immigration Table is funded by George Soros, have economic incentives, but a good many of them are dong it just for the sake of empty virtue signaling.  And all these people are inconsistent; as someone noted in an email list, “None of them would criticize Israel for building a wall, refusing Syrian refugees, or deporting African immigrants,” but they have no problem condemning their own countries to Third World status.
  • Cucked Christians have become obsessed with this notion of all people being “image bearers”.  Their flawed logic goes that all people have the image of God so therefore it’s wrong to deport immigrants, refuse refugees,etc.  By this cucked logic, anyone promoting self-preservation, in fact anything other than ethnomasocism, is wrong because it might hurt the person or feelz of an image bearer.
  • Cucked Christians recently have become obsessed with this Cultural Marxist notion of ‘racial reconciliation‘ which essentially amounts to whites promoting their own dispossession.  You literally have white cucks criticizing churches for being “too white”; yet, these same cucks would never criticize Israel for being too Jewish or Ashkenazi, nor a black church for being too black.
  • Cucked Christians have recently tied the pro-life movement to the support of Third World immigration.  In this version, to be pro-life one must support the Third World immigration invasion of his own lands.  For example, cuckservative Cardinal Timothy Dolan recently told a crowd that unless they support the Third World immigration invasion of the West, they are not pro-life.  Coupling pro-life with immigration probably signals the last gasp of the pro-life movement.
  • Cucked Christians are basically telling white people not to make white babies but to adopt black or mestizo babies instead.  This is literal cuckoldry, which is unhealthy.

How did we get here?  How has contemporary mainstream Christianity become such a suicide cult?

I mean, just over a thousand years ago when a Moorish invasion of Charlemagne’s kingdom was taking place, Christians do not hesitate to take up arms and repel the invaders.  Today, Cucked Christians welcome the invaders.  What happened?

Here’s my brief theory:

Women are more religious than men.  For the past few hundred years, church attendance, for all denominations, has been higher for women than men.   Nonetheless, the leadership of said churches was by men.  And until recently, because Christianity still had prestige, you would get more normal men in church leadership positions.  However, over the past 75 years or so, a selection process has been taking place.  As Christianity lost prestige, more normal, healthy men have moved along to other pastures and forsaken any interest in church leadership positions.  As a result, the entire apparatus of Western Christianity has largely been overtaken by beta girly men.  Today you have a bunch of beta males, often literal cuckolds, who incessantly whine like little pansies:  “Welcome the stranger.”  “You’re deporting an image bearer.”  “Racial reconciliation means for your next kid, consider transracial adoption.”

My hunch is that these new leaders have bad genes for self-preservation.   In a normal, healthy society, they might have jobs as caregivers, but they certainly wouldn’t be given the keys to the kingdom or have any say in politics.  The fact that these people now hold positions of power does not bode well.

In terms of sociobiology, the current trend of Cucked Christianity is not healthy, i.e. adaptive.  And this maladaptive behavior cannot last forever.  Does it mean that end of Christianity in the West, or will a newer, uncucked form of Christianity rise to replace it?

First published at Dark Enlightenment.

Alfred Clark
the authorAlfred Clark

141 Comments

  • Pingback: My Homepage
  • “Women are more religious than men” False. Women don’t engender religious conviction themselves. Love for something immaterial like God, a devotion to law and order, fascination with concepts of being and reality, are all characteristic of men. Women don’t care about those things unless a man leads them. Religion is a man’s game, and women just follow. The problem is Christianity was feminized and men left. Real men are reorganizing the real Christian church.

  • Interesting article. The way I see it two possibilities will occur as far as the Alt-Right is concerned. Scenario A is that Christianity as a whole dies out in the west, replaced with Paganism and/or Agnosticism. Scenario B is the pozzed protestant denominations fade into obscurity by a resurgent orthodox/traditional RCC. Myself personally, I would not set foot in a church unless it returns to it’s masculine, traditional roots.

  • If you are against the life of a grown adult person (immigrant or not) but for the life of something that isn’t even a human yet, you are NOT pro life. Sorry but that is the truth. Also, not ALL men are masculine but the majority still are. You are fine. Live and let live, It has NO effect on you.

  • Mr. Clark, Part of this article is rather unfortunate and the other part is incomplete. The unfortunate part is the name calling. I would like to share this article with the American church but it’s effect will be nil because it insults the very people who need to hear it. By calling them ‘cucks’ (and they are) you have taken away their ability to hear your valuable input. If you call a man ugly and then say he ought to go back and finish his degree all he hears is the ‘your ugly’ part. Sadly your message is lost as insulting slander instead of an intelligent argument to cause a change in attitude and behavior.

    Secondly your lack of understanding of the depths of the problem, specifically with the American church, is apparent. You could look into the IRS code and see that since 1954 churches in the US have been under IRS control. US churches get a twice annual letter from an IRS, or IRS contracted, lawyer telling the preachers what they can and cannot say. This is the heart of the problem. Wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnson_Amendment This law is in direct violation of the 1st Amendment. Since the government claims authority over literally everything on earth, everything is political, and as a result of the Johnson law, the churches may not even discuss current events and apply biblical truths for our society to reject it’s leaders evil. There is no better source of example of the evil of government and also examples of good and moral governments and just societies than in the Holy Bible. Simply, pastors and preachers and clerics, can’t apply these truths to ourselves and leaders. Sad.

    I agree with your assertions. This (actual) Christian needs men like you on our side. May the LORD bless you.

    @ProGunFred
    On Gab

  • ~ The Separation Of Church And Hate:

    There is a good reason why Church and State must always remain separate. Let’s get something straight, right from the start: A theocratic state is not a free state, and never will be. I’m sure it was never Jesus’ intention nor was it His will that anyone should be dominated in His name, the name of Christ. That is the will of men. To be accurate, the concept in itself is anti-Christian. You can only follow Christ by choice, not by legislation.

    It seems some people are more intent on casting stones at perceived sinners than propagating the love of Christ. ~ “Above all else, I command you love one another”. ~ This was the message that Jesus preached, and as far as I can see, the worth of a soul will only be measured as such. But I can assure you of one thing, when your time of judgment comes, you won’t be asked to recite scripture, but rather, if anything, the question will be: Did you get the message and live by it?

    For all of you people out there on the religious right, you should try to remember that looking for sins to condemn, and people to persecute in the name of God, is simply Satan’s way of keeping you from seeing what is good and praiseworthy. It’s Satan’s favorite means of deceit; getting people to hate and kill each other in the name of God and Christ Jesus. Twisting scripture to incite hatred and division.

    Understand this; that by doing so, you are defaming the name of Christ, associating Jesus with bigotry and hate. Jesus was never cursed with these feelings, these sins that you commit in His name. It’s widely agreed that He rose above it all, and to use His name for the justification of spreading contempt and hatred for anyone is true heresy. It isn’t Pro-Christ by any means, but clearly Anti-Christ.

    *******************************************************************
    ~ It doesn’t really seem to matter at this point if you believe in God and Christ or not. What we have are Anti-Christians, the antithesis of the persona Jesus, and they are attempting, through legislation, to declare America to be a theocratic state and nation, legitimizing discrimination under the false guise of “religious freedom”. If you’re not one of the “chosen” you’re fair game for persecution, oppression and abuse. It’s a perfect “us” and “them” scenario. If you express opposing views to the “Order” or you’re a non-believer, or in any way perceived as a “sinner”, they’ll be coming for you.

    ~ Anti-Christians ~ The scriptures flow as sweet as honey from their lips, seducing and robbing in the name of God. These are the ones Jesus spoke of that would come in the End Times and deceive many in His name. Anti-Christians: You will know them by their bigotry, their hatred, and their contempt for “others”.

  • ~ The Christian Dilemma:

    The greatest threat to America, and indeed to the rest of world, at this point in history, comes from the staunch advocates of right wing ideology, and I must submit this warning to you: There is a grave problem with the right wing movement, in that; they seem to possess a distorted sense of entitlement. They’ve set themselves apart, and seem to think that their faith gives them the right to view the world from a platitude of conceit, through condescending eyes, and with a false sense of superiority. They actually believe themselves to be superior beings, with a manifest destiny and some strange notion that God is on their side. A people with a desire to conquer, under the false guise of Christianity, seeking to dominate in the name of Christ, their view of humanity being reduced to nothing more than a matter of “us” and “them”.

    What they fail to realize is; if the Christ you believe in leads you to view other humans as lesser beings, then you are a follower of the anti-Christ. The plain truth is; God doesn’t have a religion and God doesn’t discriminate. Any religion that professes to be the only true religion, or that they‘re special in the eyes of God preaches false doctrine. If the Spirit of God is truly with you, it will only be known by acts of “unconditional” love and charity. No religion can claim exclusive rights to God. He belongs to all that He has created, and to foster a belief in “us” and “them” is to divide humanity, not unite it.

    And so it will be, in The End, that those who have set themselves apart from their fellow man will find that they have set themselves apart from God. The worth of a soul will only be measured by how much it has loved, nothing more, nothing less. Woe to those who have taken the widow’s mite and built castles and empires in His name. They have incurred a great accountability, their suffering will be unending.

    Even Jesus will not claim to be Christian, but will only proclaim the glory of the Father. And when He returns they will shout: “Here we are Lord!” And He will respond: “I never knew you”. They have forsaken the Word and have become prisoners of the Numbers.

    Those who have put themselves first will be last.

    • By saying ”

      The plain truth is; God doesn’t have a religion and God doesn’t
      discriminate. Any religion that professes to be the only true religion,
      or that they‘re special in the eyes of God preaches false doctrine.” —
      You make God a liar.

      God cannot lie. (Titus 1:2)

      • ~ Salvation is not gained by entertaining religious fantasies in the mind and believing oneself to be holy for doing so, with thoughts of personal divinity, but through works of ”unconditional” love and charity. To live the Word, living in Awareness, and in the NOW. You can take your Bible and burn it if it only serves as a source of division for you. The fruit of faith is “humility”, not arrogance.

          • ~ The Separation Of Church And Hate:

            There is a good reason why Church and State must always remain separate. Let’s get something straight, right from the start: A theocratic state is not a free state, and never will be. I’m sure it was never Jesus’ intention nor was it His will that anyone should be dominated in His name, the name of Christ. That is the will of men. To be accurate, the concept in itself is anti-Christian. You can only follow Christ by choice, not by legislation.

            It seems some people are more intent on casting stones at perceived sinners than propagating the love of Christ. ~ “Above all else, I command you love one another”. ~ This was the message that Jesus preached, and as far as I can see, the worth of a soul will only be measured as such. But I can assure you of one thing, when your time of judgment comes, you won’t be asked to recite scripture, but rather, if anything, the question will be: Did you get the message and live by it?

            For all of you people out there on the religious right, you should try to remember that looking for sins to condemn, and people to persecute in the name of God, is simply Satan’s way of keeping you from seeing what is good and praiseworthy. It’s Satan’s favorite means of deceit; getting people to hate and kill each other in the name of God and Christ Jesus. Twisting scripture to incite hatred and division.

            Understand this; that by doing so, you are defaming the name of Christ, associating Jesus with bigotry and hate. Jesus was never cursed with these feelings, these sins that you commit in His name. It’s widely agreed that He rose above it all, and to use His name for the justification of spreading contempt and hatred for anyone is true heresy. It isn’t Pro-Christ by any means, but clearly Anti-Christ.
            *******************************************************************
            ~ It doesn’t really seem to matter at this point if you believe in God and Christ or not. What we have are Anti-Christians, the antithesis of the persona Jesus, and they are attempting, through legislation, to declare America to be a theocratic state and nation, legitimizing discrimination under the false guise of “religious freedom”. If you’re not one of the “chosen” you’re fair game for persecution, oppression and abuse. It’s a perfect “us” and “them” scenario. If you express opposing views to the “Order” or you’re a non-believer, or in any way perceived as a “sinner”, they’ll be coming for you.

            ~ Anti-Christians ~ The scriptures flow as sweet as honey from their lips, seducing and robbing in the name of God. These are the ones Jesus spoke of that would come in the End Times and deceive many in His name. Anti-Christians: You will know them by their bigotry, their hatred, and their contempt for “others”.

      • ~ The Separation Of Church And Hate:

        There is a good reason why Church and State must always remain separate. Let’s get something straight, right from the start: A theocratic state is not a free state, and never will be. I’m sure it was never Jesus’ intention nor was it His will that anyone should be dominated in His name, the name of Christ. That is the will of men. To be accurate, the concept in itself is anti-Christian. You can only follow Christ by choice, not by legislation.

        It seems some people are more intent on casting stones at perceived sinners than propagating the love of Christ. ~ “Above all else, I command you love one another”. ~ This was the message that Jesus preached, and as far as I can see, the worth of a soul will only be measured as such. But I can assure you of one thing, when your time of judgment comes, you won’t be asked to recite scripture, but rather, if anything, the question will be: Did you get the message and live by it?

        For all of you people out there on the religious right, you should try to remember that looking for sins to condemn, and people to persecute in the name of God, is simply Satan’s way of keeping you from seeing what is good and praiseworthy. It’s Satan’s favorite means of deceit; getting people to hate and kill each other in the name of God and Christ Jesus. Twisting scripture to incite hatred and division.

        Understand this; that by doing so, you are defaming the name of Christ, associating Jesus with bigotry and hate. Jesus was never cursed with these feelings, these sins that you commit in His name. It’s widely agreed that He rose above it all, and to use His name for the justification of spreading contempt and hatred for anyone is true heresy. It isn’t Pro-Christ by any means, but clearly Anti-Christ.

        *******************************************************************
        ~ It doesn’t really seem to matter at this point if you believe in God and Christ or not. What we have are Anti-Christians, the antithesis of the persona Jesus, and they are attempting, through legislation, to declare America to be a theocratic state and nation, legitimizing discrimination under the false guise of “religious freedom”. If you’re not one of the “chosen” you’re fair game for persecution, oppression and abuse. It’s a perfect “us” and “them” scenario. If you express opposing views to the “Order” or you’re a non-believer, or in any way perceived as a “sinner”, they’ll be coming for you.

        ~ Anti-Christians ~ The scriptures flow as sweet as honey from their lips, seducing and robbing in the name of God. These are the ones Jesus spoke of that would come in the End Times and deceive many in His name. Anti-Christians: You will know them by their bigotry, their hatred, and their contempt for “others”.

  • The genetic imperative is a lot of people’s answer for a lot of things. I tend to disagree with it just out of principle giving more weight to free-will. That is not to say that I totally dismiss genetic or biological imperative.

    At the same time I do believe that more masculine men are either leaving the Church or suffer the cucks and effeminate quietly. When I was still attending Mass, I was asked, I should say being positioned for a role beyond parishioner. I denied it and got out of that Church shortly thereafter. My Dad to has long been a target for his Churches men’s group. He just learned a guy more effiminate in spirit and character is joining said men’s group.

    From my and my Dad’s experiences, as Alfred Clark says, better men are doing what they have to. Our actions are selfish in themselves but, are we to “clean out the stables?” I would not doubt that as Christians, as Parishioners, we are in the same positions as rank and file members of the AltRight. Who has released their dox? Who wouldn’t lose something if they did?

    We are men against time in all we are. Worse yet, we have a plethora of enemies working to shorten our time. Cardinal Dolan and the Pope are just as much enemies as our own kind can get. The Jews funded a commentary 200 years ago to make themselves the good guys.

    I pray that we get enough members in irl this year to start setting up alternative institutions beyond media by the end of this year. You should too.

    Cucktianity is not a new thing. What we build is and we must build it on a good foundation.

  • In this Comment area, as well as a propensity of gutter language there seems to be a great deal of confusion about what Christianity is. A whole series of ugly straw men, in fact; not at all difficult to knock down.

    In my e-book “Which Church (if any)?” I attempt to portray the religion briefly and accurately, and to show the main differences among its denominations. The alternative “none of the above” is also featured. It can be obtained here, and should help make discussions like this one better based on fact than on prejudice.

  • Good article but he misses a very big reason. Academia. Theology at premier institutions is affected by the same forces that have infiltrated the humanities and arts.
    Scholarships are reserved for minorities and grants are given to those studying feminist theology and other forms of liberation theology which teach that the white male is the continual oppressor while God is on the side of the various victim classes.

    Evangelical fervor for preaching the gospel has been replaced with a call to social justice which as we know simply means championing whatever leftist cause is in style at the time.

    • No need to abolish it. Just expose them as cucks, traitors, fools, and losers. Give them nothing and take their best and brightest. Christianity is becoming a non-White Turd World cult. It will be as successful as any other Negro or Mestizo endeavor.

  • When a society becomes misled through manipulation of the flow of information- morals, values, the sense of right and wrong and even the Churches can all be led along with it. The internet is changing that monopoly…and soon the Churches, like the rest of us will once again be free of that collar and leash.

  • I still consider myself Catholic but I honestly believe the entire hierarchy has been hijacked by some force I find difficult to even name. The current Pope says things that are so contrary to Catholic doctrine that he must genuinely be a “false pope”. I don’t feel that I have lost faith. I feel the Church has betrayed us. It is really sad.

  • I am amazed every time I walk past the churches in my town with the rainbow celebrate diversity stickers on their door. Absolutely disgusting. I am not a believer but have been looking for a church to attend for holidays etc… ,but I cant find one that is conservative, other than the Jew loving hell fire baptist churches which I can’t stand either. So, Christianity is not going to work for me. I am considered Catholic, and I like the traditions, but I can’t support anything related to the Pope.

    • You can be religious (whatever religion that may be) and still support equal rights for everyone. I don’t see the issue there.

        • You said “I am amazed every time I walk past the churches in my town with the rainbow celebrate diversity stickers on their door. Absolutely disgusting. I am not a believer but have been looking for a church to attend for holidays etc… ,but I cant find one that is conservative, other than the Jew loving hell fire baptist churches which I can’t stand either. So, Christianity is not going to work for me. I am considered Catholic, and I like the traditions, but I can’t support anything related to the Pope.”

          I assume what you meant by “churches in my town with the rainbow celebrate diversity” you mean gay rights and rights generally for people of different orientation and identity. I then stated “you can still be religious (whatever religion that may be) and still support equal rights”.
          Rights for people of different orientations and identities IS equal rights. That is why I said it.

  • just pretend it doesn’t exist and hope it goes away. will never talk a “godly” man of any sort out of their belief. once u go down that road their is no coming back

  • Because the US sets the template for all the world through media and academia, its brand of Globalism will be deeply ruinous to all nations around the world.

    If, as globalists claim, the US is so great because it intervenes in all parts of the world and takes in innumerable ‘refugees’, illegal migrants, and immigrants, then that policy becomes the template for the rest of the world whose intellectuals and cultural elites take cues from the US.

    Just look at the state of Europe. There was a time when leaders like Thatcher said, “US is philosophy, Europe is history.” But new elites of Europe want to ‘Americanize’ the Old World with the rules of the New World.

    Of course, since Jews gained supremacist power in the US and since Jews have gained sacred iconic status in the EU due to Holocaustianity, whatever Jews must be taken as the word of god. What is called ‘American Ideas’ and ‘Western Values’ are now concoctions of Jewish Globalists, and they are designed to undermine the native majority gentile power of every nation.

    Because whatever the US does has a great impact on the world, the US must stop with its invade-invite lunacy. It not only harms the US and the nations that are invaded(mostly in the Middle East and North Africa) but all those sucker-nations that slavishly imitate everything the US does.

    If US decides to go over the cliff, much of the world will follow.

    Because the US billed itself as ‘nation of immigrants’, the EU followed, and look at the dire problems this ‘Americanization’ caused.

    Mass Immigration is demographic imperialism.

  • Is mainstream Christianity cucked? Yes, but so is everything else in our society, so we shouldn’t be surprised that religion is cucked too. The military is cucked. The universities are cucked. The private sector is cucked. And so on.

  • Christianity is based on the worship of a Jewish Zombie who’s father “Chose” people in certain geographic locations, of a certain ethnicity.

    How ANY European is following this SHITE is beyond me.

  • The theme that welcoming Muslim migrants amounts to cultural or religious “suicide” is based on the premise that the incoming zealots will gain enough influence over time to displace the Christian norm.

    That is quite a surprising assumption. For a very long time past the Christian wish to take the Gospel to Muslims has been frustrated by laws that forbid “proselytization” – sometimes on pain of death. Now in recent years, that has been overcome by the remarkable opportunity to preach to Muslims as they come here. Surely that is a fabulous opportunity?

    If however the opportunity is being ignored, it’s quite obvious whom to blame.

  • Christianity is Judiasm 2.0 – a manufactured religion created by ((( ))) to cuck out Gentiles and it’s working wonderfully. We need to dump it entirely and get back to our Asatru Gods and Goddesses.

    • Hell no. Pagans contributed next to nothing in modern Europe. It was Christians not pagans who smahed the repeated Muslim invasions of Europe. Fucking pagans sold christians as slaves to the Muslims. No Christianity needs to get tough again. No reversion to paganism needed

      • You Christcucks need to tread lightly. Faggots like you have no friends anywhere. The only reason we tolerate you is because you’re White. The moment you start sperging about Paganism you can fuck off. Where are you gonna go eh faggot? No where. Nobody gives a shit about you.

        • Bring it tree fucker. It’s you who is in the very barely tolerated minority. As for where I would go? How about using trees you stupid fucks worship as crosses and crucify you? I think that would be a good start tough guy.

          • You’re such a stupid faggot you can’t even realize I’m not a “pagan”. You’re just another stupid White faggot who virtue signals. You’re no different from a Liberal, Neocon, Libertarian, Conservative or Marxist. You’ll suck a nigger dick to prove you’re not a racist homophobe. You’re a loser. You already lost your church. We don’t need you. You need Whites.

        • I would have guessed that you’re the one with no friends.

          Do you have an office Avi? Do you know who that guy was in the show and who he is in real life?

          • You guessed wrong because you’re stupid and indoctrinated.

            I can say, “I’m going to do something good for White people” and not get attacked by my own circle of friends. You can’t say that. You definitely can’t go to church and say that. I can openly act in my biological self interests. You can’t. You lost.

          • Well, you act like a petulant bitch especially for someone who has had an active account since 2009. If you kept your hating and ignorant mouth shut you could do more for “your people.” So if I’ve just done nothing, lemme know.

            2, you should look at who you’re parading around for an Avi. First, Dwight Shroot was a Christian. Second, the actor setup a website and maybe nonprofit to subvert Christianity with New Age and Multicult org.

            Good job on promoting your shit both knowingly and unknowingly.

          • Good One. Dwight Shroot is not the most Autistic guy that’s been on TV in a while, right?

            Good job getting checkmated by a lowly DailyStormer.

          • Good job being a normal fagge. You’re so autistic you actually believe everyone magically belongs to the “lowly Daily Stormer” when they disagree. Seriously, between sucking dicks and saving whales you’re a run-of-the-mill Shitlib.

          • You’ve really lost it, dawg. IDEK WTF you’re talking about now. REEEEEEEEEEEEE It’s hard to kick against the Pricks

  • Feminism and Consumerism were bound to mess up the world.

    They are against nature and mess up the organic balance of things.

    To understand this, imagine 4 people: 2 men and 2 women.

    Suppose there are 2 well-paying jobs.

    We need to take human nature into consideration: Men will marry women without jobs, but women don’t wanna marry men without jobs.

    These are the possible outcomes.

    1. Two men get the jobs. Each can afford to raise a family, and each is willing to marry a woman without a job. So, each marry a woman. So, two men have jobs and they have wives. Everyone gets something. Men have jobs and wives, women have husbands, wives have family. Two incomes support two families.

    2. One man and one woman get the jobs. Each can afford a family. The man with the job marries the woman with the job. In contrast, the man without the job cannot a mind a mate since women don’t want men without jobs. So, the woman without the job doesn’t marry the man without the job.

    Since the man with the job and woman with the job married, both their incomes serve just one family. Meanwhile, the man without the job has no money and no family. And the woman without the job doesn’t want to marry the man with no job, so she has nothing too.

    So, we have all the good stuff in one family and nothing for the other two. Also, since both man and woman work, there is a chance that they will have no kids or just one kid. All that combined income goes to serve very narrow interests. Two get it all, the other two get nothing.

    3. One man and one woman get the jobs. Each can afford a family. The man with the job marries the woman without a job. In contrast, the woman with the job remains unmarried because she doesn’t want to marry the man without a job. Under this formulation, three get something while the male without a job get nothing. The man with a job has a wife, the woman without a job, and they can have a family. The woman with a job has money even if no husband. She has no family but she has money to have fun with.

    But the man without a job has no money and no wife. Such a man is destined for White Death.

    4. Two women get the jobs, and that means the two men have no jobs. Since women don’t want to marry men without jobs, the women spend all their income on themselves in wild consumerism. They don’t want a family with loser men with no jobs. Since the two men got no jobs, they lose status and hope.

    Of the four options, only #1 offers something for everyone.

    #3 isn’t so terrible since 3 out of 4 get something.

    #2 is awful because 2 get everything while 2 get nothing. Still, its saving grace is there is formation of at least one family.

    #4 is horrible because 2 get everything but there is no family. All that money is spent on fleeting vanity and hedonism.

    Now, one might hope for a world where 4 people can have 4 good jobs, but the world isn’t like that. There is only a limited number of jobs that can support families.

    When women entered the work force in big numbers, they took away lots of good jobs from men. Every woman who got a good job robbed a man not only of a job but of a family. When a man takes a job from a woman, he doesn’t take away her chance of having a family since men with jobs will marry women without jobs.

    When women take jobs from men, it leads to men losing their market value as marriage prospects. Women not only take the jobs form men but also the hope of family, the most important thing in life(because people, as life-forms, are created from families and pass down their genes and memory by forming their own families).

    When women have high-paying jobs, their standards go up in the mating game. But since fewer men have good jobs, the ‘ideal man’ is harder to find. So, women with jobs face a drought in marriageable men. Since they only want to marry a successful man and will not settle for anything less, many women would rather blow all their money on vanity and self-pleasure. So, the income that, in the hands of man, could have supported a family ends up serving the vain piggery of a woman hooked to SEX AND CITY lifestyle.

    How did we end up like this? It’s because we forgot the lesson that we are, first and foremost, organisms or life-forms. The role of life-form is to sustain itself. Everyone will die one day and so will his/her loved one, the partner in life. So, how do they ‘survive’ after death? Through their children who are continuation of their DNA and cultural/personal torchbearers of their forebears memory. That’s what Judaism is about, indeed how it got started. It was about remembrance of ancestors by descendants, and it all went back to the Covenant.

    Now, we are more than mere life-forms like animals. We have advanced brains, and we need ideas, values, and culture. Still, all those things only exist in and matter to the living. All the books in the world mean nothing without people to read them, and every person is the product of man and woman(unless we create a Brave New World scenario of clones by the state). We are more than biology, but it begins with and is made possible by biology. Without biology, there is no being.

    And the main source of meaning is in the family since every person was created by father and mother and since every person can only ‘live on’ after death via the DNA passed down to his/her kids who are also the cultural/personal torchbearers of their parents’ lives.

    But for some reason, the cult of individualism made us forget that every individual is a ‘continual’, merely one link in the long chain of life. He didn’t pop out of a book or materialize out of the thin air or come into existence by a musing of someone’s mind. Every person is born biologically and become human emotionally.

    Because we are surrounded by books, movies, and fantasy, we seem to think reality can be created via the imagination and ‘creativity’. We’ve replaced creation with creativity. It’s no wonder that we’ve come to accept something like ‘gay marriage’. We confuse reality with fantasy, as if the world is created and sustained by wish-fulfilment. We confuse reproductive fact with creative wish. So, if two lesbians want to believe that they ‘had a kid’ together, we better go along with this charade. If a man says he is a ‘woman’, we are pressured to comply. If a bunch of freaks wanna hair-split sex into 50 genders, we are supposed to take it seriously as intellectualism and science.

    Also, consumerism divorced pleasure from purpose. Life-forms feel pleasure of food and sex because they must eat to survive and they must have sex to produce new life. But consumerism created technologies that allowed wanton eating and wanton sex for pleasure alone. So, piggery became the New Normal, as with fatso Lena Dunham who gorges on cakes while sitting on the toilet. It’s like she has to eat and shi* at the same time. And like an animal, she humps everyone, and she can sustain such behavior because there are contraceptives, pills, and abortion. This kind of porno-propaganda or pornoganda has, in some ways, become America’s main cultural message to the world. America is an exceptional country? Or an excessive cunt-ry?

    Also, the idea of freedom has become nihilistic. It’s good to be free, but for what purpose? In the end, we must make use of our freedoms. And in making any decision, we are choosing one freedom and losing all the others. If we choose to study medicine, we don’t have free time to study other things. We must commit to medicine. If we study chemistry, there are other stuff we can’t study. If we decide to read a book, then we can’t read another book. We have only so much time and energy for so much. So, even though we want freedom, every choice ‘imprisons’ us with one endeavor and locks out all the rest. It’s like the scene in SUPERMAN. If Superman is to save one bunch of people, he can’t save another bunch of people. He can’t do everything. He fails to save Lois Lane and brings her back to life only by cheating.

    https://youtu.be/JpBfR7GT5zE?t=2m43s

    So, we must raise a question about the thing that is more important than freedom. We mus ask, what is the main purpose and meaning of life.

    After all, suppose there’s a society where everyone is forced to be a husband or a wife.

    And suppose there is another society where everyone is free and uses his/her freedom to only indulge himself/herself and not have families.

    In the end, isn’t the former society better off since it has families and new life? It lives on and sustains itself.

    In contrast, what good is the other society in the long run? Sure, freedom is nice, but if people used their freedom to just indulge themselves, they’ve left no legacy for the future… like so many hedonistic white folks are doing today.

    Now, we want freedom, but we need to use that freedom wisely. But everything in our ideology and culture fills our hearts, minds, eyes, and ears with the wrong lessons and vile temptations. If Lena Dunham, madonna, Emma Sulk, and Ashley Judd are the ‘role models’ for womenkind, no wonder there are so many problems. Stalinist, Nazi, or even Sharia culture is better for women. After all, the Muslim Order, repressive as it is, lasted for 0ver 1000 yrs. How long can the current West last? In the end, the worth of civilization isn’t measured by trending ideas or fashionable values. It is measured by its ability to survive and continue. The current West pontificates about its pride of ‘western values’, but if those lead to the fall of the West, they were the wrong values.

    Now, I’m not saying that the only choices are between western decadence/excess and Sharia Law. There is something in between. It’s like Aldous Huxley in BRAVE NEW WORLD REVISITED called out his mistake in BRAVE NEW WORLD of offering only two options: the world of neo-primitive brutality and orgy-porgy techo-hedonism.

    We can be both free and find meaning.

    As we are life forms, we are made of families, and we continue through families we create who carry the DNA code, remember their parents/forbears, and preserve the culture/heritage. Family is bio-socialist. Socialism sacrifices the ideal of absolute individual liberty with a system of relations calibrated for the maximum good of society. So, even though taxing the rich at higher rates than others is ‘unfair’ by libertarian principles, it is deemed necessary since the rich can afford to pay more for the GOOD of society. So, socialism takes into consideration the difference between being rich, being middle income, and being poor. In a similar vein, bio-socialism takes into account that men and women are not mere individuals to be understood by abstract theories. It’s not just about individuals and choice. Men and women are biological creatures brought into being by a certain biological process, grow ideally in a sound family environment, and whose legacy is assured by forming families of their and having children. So, family becomes the foremost bio-socialist unit in the formulation of what is best for society. In the aforementioned scenario of 2 men and 2 women in a society with jobs, bio-socialism will favor 2 men getting the jobs since everyone will get something. 2 jobs held by 2 men can support 2 families.

    But the family has come under attack by feminism and other nutjob ideologies. Also, the role of mother has been mocked as ‘having babies’ as if that is all a woman does: lays babies like a chicken lays eggs. In fact, babies soon grow into children, and creating a child is the process of creating a human with mind, heart, ideas, values, and etc. Every day, millions of new neurons are added to children, and the process of their growth is fascinating. Besides, what is a more rewarding ‘thing’ for a person to create than another thinking & feeling human being with heart and soul? Besides, all the products and services offered by professions and jobs exist only to serve human beings. So, creating and developing a new human being is the richest experience in life. It’s why Michael Corleone says at the beginning of GODFATHER III(though bad movie) that the most precious things in this world are children. No matter how rich Michael is, he will die, and then the ONLY people who will remember and care about him are his survivors, the kids and grandkids. His money and his mansions and cars have no mind, no heart, no nothing. Only life remembers life.

    But in our world, the Ideal is for a guy with good job to marry a woman with a good job(which means one less man with a good job who can afford a family), and since are too busy with work, the raising of the kids is left to PC ideologues(teacher hacks) and the Mammon of Pop Culture that corrupts children from a young age.

    The modern world is great for giving us freedoms that our ancestors didn’t have and didn’t know how to have. And initially, modern people had both freedom and meaning, a sense of purpose. They were freed from traditional bonds but still morally and culturally informed by those bonds and values. It’s like Michael Corleone has freedoms that his forbears didn’t in Old Sicily, but having grown up in a culture of family and values, his individuality is shaped by those values. He has freedom but also cultural compass.

    But as the cult of freedom took on a life of its own via ideological arrogance and hedonistic excess, the connection to a sense of purpose was lost.

    Ideology gave people a sense of permanence through ideas when, in fact, ideas only exist in the minds of people, life forms. No people, no ideas. Ideas are nothing without minds to appreciate them, and minds are bio-mass of life-forms.

    If ideology gave people a false sense of permanence via books & arts, entertainment made people feel that the Moment is Forever. Thus, people lose sight of the larger sense of time and history as they’ve become hooked to pop music or movies that glorify the orgiastic hysterics of the moment. Humans went from organismic to the orgasmic. So, even middle aged men and women still feel like teenagers as they listen to pop music and watch hollywood movies about caped heroes. Or when they play dumb video games.

    We need to find a way to reconnect freedom with meaning and purpose.

    All these pussyhat feminists bitch and whine about ‘freedom’, as if Trump is going to turn them all into chattel slaves. But in fact, the real problem women face today is lack of meaning and purpose with all their misguided freedoms. They have freedom, but the choices they’ve made are terrible, not least because our reigning ideology and culture encourages women to act like SEX AND CITY, Lena Dunham, Miley Cyrus, Emma Sulk, or one of those trashy shallow pseudo-intellectuals who write for NYT or yammer on NPR.

    In a way, the odd alliance of feminists and Muslims suggest at something buried in the feminist psyche. There is something within them that is crying out for meaning, order, purpose, and continuance. Is it any surprise that Lindsey Lohan is leaning toward Islam?

    Only a neo-fascism can restore the order and balance in Western Man and Woman.

    The history of mankind has offered people four basic choices:

    1. Forcing people to do what is the right thing.

    2. Forcing people to do what is the wrong thing.

    3. Giving people freedom, and people freely doing the wrong thing.

    4. Giving people freedom, and people freely doing the right thing.

    The best of all possible worlds will have most people in #4 mode.

    The worst of all possible worlds will have most people in #3 mode.

    Why is #3 worse than #2? Why is a world where people are forced to do the wrong thing better than one where people freely do the wrong thing?

    Because in the #3 scenario, there is still a political/social power that can make people do the right thing under a new policy. It may be currently forcing people to do the wrong thing, but with a change of course, the system can force the people to do the right thing.

    In contrast in the #3 scenario, the people have the freedom/power to do the wrong thing, and there is no higher power to stop them or correct them. This is why black problem today is worse than black problem during slavery. During slavery, whites forced blacks to be slaves, the wrong thing. And slavery had to end. But since whites still had the power, they could make blacks do the right things with the end of slavery. In contrast, the corrupt and free blacks of today won’t listen to anything since they got the Agency and Power. But to do what with their freedom? Turn cities into Detroit and Baltimore. Blacks used their freedom to turn their communities into neo-jungles and bitch,whine, and holler like mad baboons. And since they have all the freedoms and rights under the law, they can just go on acting loutish.

    In contrast, blacks in Cuba are in scenario #2. Cuban Socialism doesn’t really work. It is the wrong thing. It keeps blacks doing what is economically backward and inefficient. BUT, the state still has control over the blacks, so if state policy were to change one day for the better, blacks can be pressured to do the right thing under state power. But a lot of American blacks are hopeless. They got the power and freedom and they used it for total lunacy and jungle behavior. And there is no power above them to say NO.

    One might say #1 and #4 have same results and so are equally valid. Whether people are forced to do the right thing OR use their freedom to do the right thing, the end result is people doing the right thing. Still, we want freedom. We don’t want to be forced to do stuff by some tyranny.

    Under system #1, even those who want to do the wrong thing have no choice but to do the right thing.

    Under system #4, those with the freedom to do the wrong thing still choose to do the right thing. That is true morality, but increasingly harder to come by these days because of family breakdown, cultural decadence, moral degeneration, and etc. After all, in order for people to freely do the right thing, they must be inculcated with good, sound, and healthy values and outlook and understanding. But just look at the state of PC and Pop Culture. We are raising kids to be self-absorbed tards and snowflakes and loons. Why so many kids get tattoos? They have no sense of time, of tomorrow. They don’t think, “yrs will pass and I might look back and find this tattoo really stupid.” No, all they care about is the NOW. If they think it’s cool NOW, they must get it and just fuc* tomorrow.

    In order for #4 to work, we need a society that promotes culture and values of maturity, sobriety, dignity, and integrity, like what Vito Corleone had(except for the organized crime thing, but then he was pressured into by that no-good Fanucci who was fleecing the neighborhood).

    But if #4 is rendered impossible because our culture creates tons of idiots with PC and junk culture, then the only option is to go back to #1.

    #1 is unpleasant even if it forces people to do the right thing because we want to be free and also, we want people to do the right thing out of moral sense than out of social coercion. Still, #1 is the only option when #4 fails and we slip into a state of #3. The black American community, at this point, can only fix its problems through #1 option. Too many blacks have freely acted to be a total tards and chillun.

    It’s funny. Life is a form of energy.

    The modern world has tons of energy made possible by electricity. Look at Earth at night from space, and you can see entire areas lit up by tons of electricity. We see the most lights in Western nations and East Asian nations. So much industrial and recreational energy… and yet, so little life energy, so little energy of reproduction. Modern folks are like moths before an artificial light. They are addicted to the false life of industrial energy that fills them with light, convenience, and entertainment, but they have lost the sense of real energy, that of life itself. Because industrial energy is so powerful, those who huddle around it feel so alive, but it’s all an illusion. Watching TV filled with flashing images or playing some roller-coaster video-game may make one feel alive, but it’s all illusion. Being around all that industrial energy has sapped modern man of life energy, that of family and creation of new life for legacy.

    In contrast, the dark continent of Africa is having lots of kids and producing lots of life. They lack in industrial energy but they have something far more valuable: life energy.

    And they will eventually move to the modern world with its aging and dying populations who prefer the artificial ‘life’ of industrial energy over the real energy of life around family and culture.

  • As usual, it is due to the influence of Jews (Scofield Bible, etc. etc.). Christians now (a recent phenomenon) refer to Jews as the “Chosen People”, despite the Bible explicitly referring to the Jews as the Synagogue of Satan, and the Sons of your Father, the Devil.

  • Christianity is like coal. It offers lots of spiritual heat and moral warmth. But it has to be handled with care with good ventilation. Why? What does coal produce? Carbon Monoxide or CO which is odorless and lethal.

    So, the Church needs good ventilation system. Yes, the Church teaches us to love mankind and be forgiving, and etc. That is a good message to warm the soul. But too much of anything is never any good. And excessive utopian save-the-world sermonizing of Christians can have the effect of CO.

    So, we need to ventilate the Church. Give us the sermon about love and forgiveness but air out too much sanctimoniousness that turns people into holier-than-thou pied-pipers of their race to extinction.

    Also, Christians need to reminded that Jesus never said the world of man could be saved. He only said that man should try to be good and seek the Lord’s grace in the afterlife.

  • I know a so-called Baptist church that actually preach in favor of the “melting pot” and have for years. The preacher has said these things on many occasions:
    “There are no borders.”
    “We are citizens of the kingdom of heaven.”
    “Only God himself could have brought together such a wonderfully diverse group of believers.”

    Members of the church even harbor illegal aliens from Mexico and encourage men and women to marry them into citizenship. If a newcomer were to just go in and comment to him about being surprised how diverse the church is he’d probably go into all that talk. He’s had a Mexican wife, too. (He’s white, btw).

      • I don’t visit there any longer in order to know who is hiding where at the moment, but I’m sure that there are several illegals at services on any given Sunday. They have most likely doubled-down on their propaganda lately with everything that’s been going on. They are a cult. The kind that tell people “I love you” when they first meet them and are touchy-feely with the hugging and some will even try to kiss you on the cheek. My mother used to force me to go with her when I was younger. Only their church and a “sister church” in Michigan (I think) are considered to be “saved”. All the worst cult-like warning signs.

      • Almost forgot to add that the member that own businesses hire the illegals for physical labor too.

        It’s too damn awful to be true, but unfortunately it’s a real place in Arizona.

    • I had to suffer under Baptism early on. It actually makes be angry because it was such a nice church to grow up under and then we started taking in blacks from the surrounding, failing churches. Money was now missing. Cabinets had locks installed. The most important difference was fighting. For the first time children were fighting. I was only 10 years old at the time and witnessed blacks attacking other children. Eventually I had to punch several blacks, including girls, and tell them “Fuck off nigger!” And there it ended. The illusion was permanently dispelled.

      Even at a young age I noticed the differences (Kevin MacDonald is always
      right). I distinctly remember seeing an Asian woman in our church for
      the first time, and she was pregnant. I remember thinking, “What is she doing here?” That was before the failing black churches moved in. It’s not that she was good or bad, she’s just not one of us and never will be. Soon it wouldn’t matter. The Asians would leave a good church and avoid the groid too.

      • Sheesh. I would think that Blacks would behave themselves in church. They’re supposed to be so religious.

        • I had long blond hair and they would pull it so hard it would come out. I punched many, many blacks when I was a kid. Then, I some dumb White church lady would blame me. Not to say I was a saint. After all, most White children don’t talk back or hit back. I’ve been punching back my entire life and paying for it.

      • You don’t know shit about what America was founded on. This was meant to be a nation for white Europeans fleeing religious persecution, not a fucking melting pot. The BS “melting pot” concept only started in the 1960s.

  • Don´t forget the fundamental problem of Christianity which is its origins. Many movements get a redress and pull themselvs out of a crisis by calling “Back to the roots!” But, in the case of Christianity, the roots are, actually, its weakest spot. Returning to the roots consequently would mean reviving a kinky egalitarian semitic doomsday sect. After all, what we know as Christianity is a result of heroic spiritual effort of several generations of Church fathers and other theologians of gentile ethnics to reshape this trash cult into something digestible to post-Roman Europeans. And it had worked for several centuries until Aryan peoples finally recovered enough reason and intellectual courage to move on.
    So, with foundations like these, there is little chance western Chritianity will ever again come up with anything valuable for the civilization that has so far given it home. And one should not spend too much time with effort to rescue such a hopeless endeavor!

      • Standing on shaky ground there, my friend. Christianity: the religion based around a Jew (Jesus) and formalised by a Jew (Paul/Saul). What little of value there is to be found in Christianity – note the distinction between the religion and its adherents, many of whom are good people – is the consequence of its “Europeanisation”. That is to say, the influence of Pagan culture.

        I, like many others, call for a return to our roots: the Homeric epics, the all-too human deities of Ancient Greece, Rome, and Northern Europe, the will to power (the polar opposite of the wholly unnatural Judaeo-Christian slave morality).

        We are not all equal, for we were not all created in the image of God; for the Judaeo-Christian God is dead, and you need to realise it.

        • You know nothing of Christian apologetics. On top of that bashing Christianity is pissing on our forefathers. I for one have more respect for my ancestry. Pagans did not build Europe to it’s majesty in the middle ages or through the colonial era. They were too busy worshipping trees, fucking goats or selling Christians to muslim slavers (hmm (((who))) else sold slaves to the muslims?) . Finally any Christian bashers who are hating it because of what is happening in the current culture are not worthy of my time. You know nothing of the Bible which is too bad because there are plenty of good arguments defending Christianity. The proof you have zero knowledge of Christianity is you call it judeo Christianity. It’s not it’sjust Christianity. Stop talking/debating churchians. Maybe check out Vox Day or Florian or basic bitch level upgrade from ignorance.

          As a final good bye to tommy boy. I wouldn’t tolerate you polluting my country with your progeny anyways. And I hope you get slivers and die of tetanus after you finish raping that tree, tree fucker.

  • The landscape can indeed look bleak at first glance but under the surface there is still hope. The “mainstream” churches of American pseudo-Christianity are rapidly dying out and doing so by the theologically equivalent of self-immolation: “Hey, this latest grovelling to liberal anti-Christian culture didn’t work so what we must need is even more grovelling to the liberal anti-Christian culture!” In reality the collapse of the pseudo-Christian cultural religion that dominates the landscape is winnowing out the liberals and favors the “conservatives” who take faith and Scripture seriously, who don’t have women “pastors” much less embrace homosexuality, who tend to have large families, etc. These churches are overwhelmingly White as most black dominated churches are led by charlatans and preach heretical social justice nonsense. I am actually encouraged by where we are in the church although there is a great deal of work still to do and people like Russel Moore are not helping. He was a much more reasonable and useful voice before he moved to D.C. with the ERLC, now he seems to be little more than a religious version of a career lobbyist who desperately wants the approval of the power brokers in D.C. who laugh at him and his faith openly.

    • I’ve seen this happen first hand in my own church which is Lutheran Church Missouri Synod. About 10-15 years ago there was a push by the higher ups and some pastors to make the church more “contemporary” “newbie friendly” “inclusive” etc. For a couple years you couldn’t tell whether our church was Lutheran or Baptist or even non-denominational. Anyway, there was a big backlash against that movement (which was called “The Church Growth Movement”) by lifelong members and for, whatever reason, has reverted back to the way it was and our church attendance is higher than ever and our services more traditional too. Go figure that the youth didn’t want Church to be secular and godless…

      • Shit, I always thought LC Missouri Synod was Conservative. Guess the rot extended even there. Good to see people woke up there.

        • It was definately a wake up call to how quickly and easily degeneracy/secularism can seep into even the most stalwart of churches. I highly doubt it will ever happen again, though. Luckily most of the damage has been reversed where I attend and there has been a real crackdown on churches that have deviated from the church teachings.

  • This is backwards. Republican forms of government have turned all the old certainties into Zombie Apocalypse. If you look at the hypothetical fiction “Submission” by Houlleubeq you see it’s the Socialists and UMP aligning with the Muslim Brotherhood to keep out the Front National…please read Submission. It’s excellent.

  • While feminization is an issue, I don’t think it is quite so organic. Christians exist in the world and the platforms they will use to communicate with the masses were in the 20th century overwhelmingly owned by Jews. Publishing houses had the ability to cherry pick the work of particular Christians and flood the market for religious literature, and likewise other market gatekeepers were able to cherry pick which Christians would get on radio and television.

    I don’t think it arguable that Christianity was slowly trending this way for many centuries. This happened in a handful of generations. Even the Protestants who were rebelling against symbolic fathers in the Church formed their own very masculine and patriarchal institutions which persisted for hundreds of years and then decayed in 3-5 generations.

    Christianity has systemic problems which have been addressed in various ways over the ages, but Christian institutions being dominated by “girly men” hasn’t really been one of them.

  • I think “girly men” (gay or straight) as well as ‘women priests’ is definitely a big factor. The more normally masculine priests/preachers don’t behave like this, or far less so. The priest in my old parish in inner London is a normally masculine man and while there were Tamil services for the Tamil immigrant congregation, there was no cuckoldry in the services I attended – he would speak about the persecution of Christians in the Middle East, and a little bit about the persecution of Christians under the Blair/Brown/Cameron regime here, but nothing about having to take refugees in here.

  • Real traditional Christianity is still the best thing we have to strengthen our cause. Because 1) you will draw in some of the cuck Christians, numbering a hundred million in USA alone 2) It has real morals (patriarchy, chastity, patience, self-sacrifice, etc) and 3) It is true. Why did Paul and the disciples die for Jesus, claiming he impossibly rose from the dead? Because they had seen Jesus after death in a very powerful way.

    If the alt-right alienates Christianity and doesn’t respect and promote the best parts of it, the alt-right has no hope. Let’s be realistic. We are trying to recruit from Christian cucks who have been led astray by false prophets and Satanic leftists who think Karl Marx just needs one more try. Recruit the Christian cucks, obv.

    • It’s not the alt-right’s job to reform Christianity. It’s the job of Christians to reform Christians. Don’t complain to the alt-right – it’s not the alt-right’s business to go telling Christians what to do. That would be presumptuous of us.

      Complaining that the alt-right “alienates” Christianity is a non-starter. Not everyone in the alt-right is going to be Christian. Some people in the alt-right are Christian. Alt-right isn’t a religion, it’s a political and meta-political movement.

  • On the issue of WHY DID LIBERALS, WHO WERE ONCE ANTI-WAR, BECOME SO PRO-WAR?

    By ‘liberals’, which ones do we mean?

    I think there is a division within the Democratic Party. Not everyone is for war and neo-imperialism. And this is why the Democratic Elites are eager to ramp up the tensions. When there is division in the home, try to unite everyone by directing their ire at some FOREIGN enemy.

    Over the years, Jewish Power has become more central to the Democratic Party. Yet, at the same time, as the Party became all about Diversity and anti-white politics(at least in rhetoric because most privileged white urbanites are Democrats), there’s been rise of anti-Jewish sentiments, not least because the majority of People of Color side with Palestinians. And increasing numbers of Prog Jews are leaning to BDS or something similar, if only because they don’t want to look like hypocrites before the Diversity Crowd. And even though Democratic anti-white politics is really meant to be anti-deplorable-white and pro-virtue-signaling-white, the problem is a lot of People of Color cannot tell the difference between ‘good’ ones and ‘bad’ ones.

    So, there is a lot of divisions within the Party. So, Jewish elites of the party beat the war drums about RUSSIA and other foreign threats to rally the much divided troops. It’s gonna be more difficult than Ancient Jews trying to keep the 12 tribes together. There are now 120 nationalities in the US.

    Foreign policy is used as rallying cry, but it can also prove to be divisive. After all, if the Democratic Party comes down hard on China, it will alienate Asian-Americans. If it comes down hard on Muslims, it will piss off Muslims. On the one hand, Jewish Democrats want US foreign policy to be pro-Zionist and fight Wars for Israel. On the other hand, this is risky since it increases bad blood between US and the Muslim world. So, the Jewish-controlled media try to spin the Middle East issue as BAD RUSSIA supports BAD ASSAD and causes all this ‘refugee’ crisis, and BAD TRUMP THE NEO-NAZI won’t take ‘refugees’ like the US didn’t take Jewish refugees during WWII. But this is, of course, selective reading of events. It ignores the fact that much of the Middle East and North Africa, MENA, are up in flames because of Jewish-controlled US foreign policy that was instrumental in messing up Iraq, Libya, and Syria. With Syria and Yemen, US used its proxies. And it overlooks the fact that the main architect of the Afghan plan began under the Carter administration.

    Democrat elites wanna push the narrative of the US as the good guy who takes refugees from evil Assad, but as Tulsi Gabbard said — and she is no bimbo like Hanoi Jane — , it is the US that has been aiding the moral equivalents of the Khmer Rouge in Syria. Gabbard blows up the narrative that American Jews are compassionate friends of the Muslims. She reports that US foreign policy is the cause for the mess in the region. She doesn’t name the Jewish Power, but anyone who connects the dots will come to that conclusion.

    We have to be careful when we say ‘liberals’ because there is a huge difference in interest and emphasis between Jewish Democratic elites and the increasing non-white rabble of the Democratic Party. And there are differences even among the rabble(and even among the elites, as rising numbers of non-whites in Democratic elite ranks don’t much sympathize with Jews). Blacks and Mexicans don’t give a crap about Russia, and they don’t give a damn about Muslim world. Mexicans want more immigration and amnesty, but blacks aren’t too keen about that. Arab-Americans are pissed at Jews, and Muslim Americans find feminism to be degenerate.

    But the Party is still largely funded and run by Jewish elites. They don’t know how to keep the rabble together, especially as Black Lives Mattered into a mess. Also, the homo issue sort of fizzled cuz Trump went along with it(though without enthusiasm) and promised to protect homos and trannies from Muslims. We have no idea what the Pussy March was supposed to be about.

    So, Jews figure the only issue that might hold everyone together is RUSSIA IS THE NEW BIG BAD WOLF THAT PUT TRUMP IN THE WHITE HOUSE. Jews fear Russia more than anything. It’s no longer the Cold War fear. During the Cold War, there was the dread of communism with Russia as its main sponsor. But such fear is history. USSR is long gone, and Russia is just a regional power, not even a great one at that.

    So, why all the fear? Why all the hysteria? It’s because the Russian example is threatening to Jewish globalist elite rule. Jews associate ‘nationalism’ with politics for the gentile majority at the expense of Jewish supremacist domination. Jews are now so addicted to total supremacist rule in the US that anything less seems like the holocaust. Not holocaust of Jews but holocaust of Jewish supremacism. After all, Jews are free to make money and get ahead in Russia and Hungary and Poland. So, why all the fuss? Putin isn’t anti-Jewish. It’s because their respective nationalisms will not totally surrender to Jewish demands. In the US, Jews have been getting everything their way. Even a man as blunt and crude as Netanyahu got to step all over Obama who remained mute during Gaza massacre and showered Israel with billions more even as Israeli politicians were spitting at him.

    When people become accustomed, addicted, to total power, anything less seems like ‘injustice’. It’s like King mentality. For a king, a good life isn’t enough. Everyone must obey him. And this became the Jewish template in the US, and Jews hate ANY threat to the globalist order where gentiles say “your wish is my command”.

    In a way, there is a consistency between Old Liberalism and New Liberalism IF we look at the Jewish element. Jewish anti-war stance in the past and Jewish pro-war stance in the present may seem like opposites on the outside BUT they have the same logic since both are predicated on ‘Is it good for the Jews?’

    In the past, anti-communism was associated with the American Right dominated by Wasps. So, naturally, Jews were either pro-communist, communist-sympathizing, or anti-anti-communist. Jews figured communism had no chance of taking over the US. So, the bigger threat to Jewish power was Wasp Right using the specter of communism to justify their power(like the Nazis did). So, being opposed to the Cold War was good for Jews.

    Today, Russia’s example inspires the path to political independence from Jewish globalist control and nationalism. Jews find it threatening, so they cook up the New Cold War. Again, it’s good for the Jews.

    It’s like the story RASHOMON by Akutagawa. Ostensibly, three people tell three different stories. The bandit says he killed the samurai in a fair duel. The wife says she killed her husband who reproached her for being raped. The samurai, through a medium, says he killed himself because he was wronged by both bandit and wife.

    And yet, at the psychological level, they are all telling the same tale driven by ego and pride. The bandit admits he is the killer but proudly says he fought a fair duel and won like a man. The woman says she was raped and victimized by the bandit, but her husband blamed her. So, she was victimized by her husband too, and so she killed her husband because she couldn’t take the blame and humiliation. She defends her dignity.

    And the husband says that after the bandit raped his wife, she asked the bandit to kill the husband so that they could run off together. So, he is the victim of both the bandit who raped his wife and of the wife who betrayed him. He makes himself the object of sympathy.

    So, in a way, they are all telling the same tale.

    Same with Jewish Zionists and Jewish Globalists. Same with Jewish anti-war Liberals and Jewish pro-war globalists. They seem to stand for different things, but if we look at the source of their logic, it all comes down to “Is it good for the Jews?”

    On the surface, what Jews want for Israel and what Jews want for EU/US seem like opposites. Jews are pro-borders & pro-nationalism in Israel and anti-borders & anti-nationalism in gentile lands. Hypocrisy? On the surface, yes. But there is consistency in their inner logic since both are predicated on “Is it good for the Jews?” It’s good for Jews to have nationalism in a Jewish-majority nation, and it’s good for Jews to weaken nationalism in gentile lands because gentile nationalism is a barrier to total Jewish domination.

  • For years I gave large amounts to my church and I demanded that my family attend. It was the church that I grew up in and the church where my parents met. Then my minister started pushing homosexuality as a viable alternative. I left and never looked back. I don’t have too strong feelings against homosexuality but it doesn’t belong in church. Now I give to the alt right. Present day ministers of mainline protestant churches were all indoctrinated in a suicide cult.

    • I’ve reached the exact same conclusion. I think we can have micro-churches at home as a strategic innovation. Saves money that used to be tithed, but the good moral teachings are still there.

  • The dispensationalist business leaders specialize in targeting, hypnotizing and managing the laziest and most naive’ sheep. Their sheep are kept in a state of psychological deep capture by what I regard as nearly criminal ringleaders. Periodically the flocks wealth is harvested and the leaders live their version of the American dream. Rinse and repeat. Its sickening.

  • Christianity is dying in the West. The Catholic Church and Protestantism will be religions of the Global South. One can see this with Anglicanism being strongest in Africa and the current Commie Latino Pope.

    If one wants to be Christian, look towards Orthodox Christianity.

    • >If one wants to be Christian, look towards Orthodox Christianity.

      When they find out you’re a white separatist, you will be excommunicated. Matthew Heimbach is the perfect example.

      • ^^This^^

        They will cuck just as quickly as anyone else. They have no moral authority over Whites and no salvation. The Orthodox Church will not defend the White race that built them.

  • It also doesn’t help that so many evangelical churches in the U.S. have fallen for this “end times” nonsense which mysteriously assigns great prophetic importance to the modern ethnostate of Israel.

    Gee, how did this happen?

    And it also results in yet another version of cucking, where American Christians sacrifice their own interests for Israel’s benefit.

    I also have to laugh at how many such Christians take the rapture seriously, despite the fact that the big proponents of this fantasy die from the usual causes, like Tim LaHaye and Jack Chick. I can see why our elites tolerate this delusion, however. It comes in handy to keep the masses politically passive. Why exert yourself to make your life, your family’s life and your race’s life better, when you expect to get raptured any day now out of your Walmart clothing?

    • The Rapture is the biggest scam ever and theologically is a retarded argument.

      If Jesus really saved and brought up all the good Christians and they disappeared during the Rapture, wouldn’t that cause EVERYONE in the World to believe in God and become a Christian? The whole point of Judgement Day and Revelations is that the world goes through trials and tribulations, with most people deceived by the Antichrist. Evangelicals choose to avoid this potential unpleasantness by believing in the Rapture Fairy Tale.

    • Exactly, the whole End times thing produces inaction and apathy. “Why fight? We’re doomed by God.”

      • There is an implicit chiliasm in main stream Evangelical ideology that basically backs into Haggai 2:6-7 hemdath translation meaning enslave the goyim for God’s judgment

      • ~ The Chosen People ~

        There seems to be a great deal of global concern about the boycott of Israeli trade at this time, and this never ending subject of Anti-Semitism, so let’s make something perfectly clear: Zionism is not Judaism. Equating Zionism with Judaism is a misconception that’s been propagated so widely, and for so long, that even many Jews cannot discern the difference. It’s this fantasy of a “Chosen People”.

        Zionism is exactly the same as Nazism when you get right down to it. You can change the label and the characters in the game, but the mindset remains exactly the same: A race of “Imaginary Superior Beings” out to dominate the world through fascism.

        Zionism, and all of these fascist ideologies we’ve seen, is a construct of the psychopathic mind. It is a mental disorder, sick minds in concert with other sick minds, in an orchestra of the criminally insane. It’s an illness that’s infecting the entire world at this point in history, and it’s literally destroying Israel from within, and the rest of the world without.

        Zionism is a parasite, a deadly cancer, hiding behind Judaism and defaming it. It is the root of all this hatred and Anti-Semitism we see in the world today: Another race of “Imaginary Superior Beings”, attacking others, proclaiming their superiority over all of humanity, and screaming “Terrorist” – “Anti-Semitism”, and calling for the destruction of anyone who doesn’t bow down to their ideology.

        Zionists are the true Anti-Semites, out to destroy Judaism, Islam and Christianity, replacing these religions, and global political structure with the Zionist New World Order. They are the true Anti-Christians and Anti-Semites combined. The labels change throughout history, but the mindset behind these ideologies, the sickness, persists. Zionism propagates fear, hatred and division, nothing but darkness.

        There are no “Chosen People”. The worth of a soul will only be measured by how much it has loved, nothing more nothing less. The choice is yours alone. Labels, however they choose to define themselves, will not save you.

    • ~ JESUS THE COMMODITY ~
      ~ As Seen On TV ~ Televangelists, selling Jesus by the gram. Mega-churches ministered by evil men seeking wealth and power, deceiving those seeking spiritual guidance. Stealing their wages, stealing their souls and telling them how they want them to vote. All in the name of Jesus. ~ Anti-Christians ~ The scriptures flow as sweet as honey from their lips, seducing and robbing in the name of God. These are the ones Jesus spoke of that would come in the End Times and deceive many in His name. Anti-Christians: You will know them by their bigotry, their hatred, and their contempt for “others”.

  • Good article. Woman are giving in the offering plate so Pastors placate to them.

    Also, the (((Scofield))) Refernce Bible has done considerable damage to Protestant churches. Basically it’s the catalyst for the “Israel is our greatest ally” “chosen people” rehetoric of today’s churches

  • America always had freedom of religion, more or less. As Christian metaphysics were eclipsed by science and technology and consequently disestablished, it faded in importance during the 20th century.

    Stripped of their institutional and philosophical importance, the churches survived by pivoting into the entertainment business.

    Christian “culture” in America – and this includes the evangelical mega-churches as well as Catholic para-church organizations – are in the same business as Oprah Winfrey. It’s a combination of self-help and support group culture.

    This naturally appeals to women more than men.

    As is often noted about women, they tend to be enthusiastic supporters of whatever the official ideology is at the time. Now, it’s SJWism. If the Alt Right’s Fantasy Trump Regime took power for a few generations, the women – and their churches – would be enthusiastic supporters of that.

    If you find a way for pastors to earn an income by being pro-white, you will have a pro-white revival in the churches. After all, pastors get into the business to sell books, seminars, and now to pimp youtube channels and blogs. Having a Christian-themed talk show with book tie-ins is their highest ambition.

    America’s One True God has always been the Almighty Dollar. Christianity is just one gimmick among many.

    • The big churches are in the entertainment business and therefore pander to the masses. But the Christian underground still exists, has not been cucked, and never will be. It is small but it always has been. You just won’t see it unless you are in it.

    • The Death of Christianity in your timeline was the death of European man…zombies since 1792. You don’t think resurrection is beyond the Ken of the White Man?

      • 1792? Oh, this is the NRx counter-Enlightenment thing. For the Catholic LARPers, it was 1517. For the pagans it was 1066.

        I’m good with 1966 as when the White man became Zombies. I’ll only LARP historically back as far as Stoddard, Grant and Sanger. Those old time WASPs were on the right path. It was WWII and the advent of the TV that really started us downhill.

    • “Christianity is just one gimmick among many.”

      lol I agree. I can name a few others off the top of my head as well: paganism, judaism, the muslim faith, empiricism, rationalism, berkeleyan idealism, german Idealism, transcendentalism, lockeanism, logical positivism, existentialism, white nationalism . . . the list goes on and on with ideologies and principles people invented to feel like they know things and that life has a purpose.

  • Interesting theory. Yes, women becoming more influential in society has certainly constituted a Pandora’s box being opened – letting us encounter evils we never thought would see the light of day. It’s a great pity that Christianity has become such a lodestone today, when up until a century or two ago, virtually all Christian denominations embraced nationalism along with hostility towards a certain tribe.

    A positive counter-example is Poland, however. In case people missed their coronation ceremony for Jesus from last November, I’ll link it here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzv9DOg0ksk Every single person present is white and Polish, and the clergy are all men. Such a Christianity is a great asset and helps ensure the continued survival and stability of the nation.

    • Before assessing this coronation of Jesus as beneficial to the Polish nation, one should be aware of the by Vatican Council II introduced adjustments of the Catholic dogma/tradition, of which ordinary churchgoers – and most of its clergy remain ignorant. By the way, the mother of Jesus Christ was the queen of Poland before the country’s partitions…

    • This is a good example of healthy, Christian nationalism; it doesn’t denigrate or humiliate Christian brothers elsewhere, but it upholds its own identity. The Eastern Orthodox churches, likewise, are generally more sane in terms of national/ethnic pride.

      • Because Orthodox church has national adjective attached to it. Of course it’s one church, but organized in smaller churches with as i said national adjectives. Russian, Serbian, Romanian…

    • religions evolve just like organisms or corporations. some go extinct while others expand. Islam has achieved a rapid expansion though violence. it remains to be seen if this is a successful long term strategy. Christianity is diminishing because its main ethnic driver, white people, have largely moved on to a more scientific worldview. religion breeds in ignorance. the alt right takes a realists view of the world and is very much anti-dogma, anti-ideologue and should then for logical consistency if nothing else be anti-religion. if you accept a religion as an integral part of the alt right then you become a religion. you can no longer argue from a scientific worldview and you cant have race realism. you become just another ideology. having said that there is plenty of room for cultural Christians who dont take scripture as a literal truth. Christianity is clearly our religion historically so i see no issue with some kind of sentimental attachment. Hitler lamented is was our great curse to have the wrong religion!

      • I reject that Christianity is White-Euros historical religion.

        It is in fact Paganism.

        I am half-Norwegian and happen to live in an area with a lot of other Americans of Scandinavian line-age. Most of us have rejected Christianity lock stock and barrel.

        We have turned to the Old Ways.

        Now he’s there are some girls here who have gone the liberal-Wiccan rout. But there are plenty of dudes who have embraced an ethno-centric Odinist world-view as well.

        Fertile ground for Alt-Right recruitment.

        (Christianity is just to Alien and Semitic for White People.)

        • I’ve heard folks make the argument that Christianity has become more Semitic in the last hundred years or so because traditional church teachings (and Saintly dictates) have been swept away.

          Just look at the artwork inside Medieval churches vs modern churches:

          – The image of Michael kicking the Devil out of Heaven is almost never seen anymore (and the idea of a War in Heaven was very similar to early European ideas about an ancient battle of the gods – Titans vs Olympians, for example).

          – Jesus is shown as a purely compassionate figure without any visible signs of masculinity. Honestly, a lot of modern Christian artwork comes across creepy, imo.

          – It’s common to see artwork in which all of the races of the world stand around Jesus and worship him (and a lot of Christians will talk about their duty of ‘uniting all in Christ’).

    • Christianity is merely the vehicle to worship Jesus. We want to be like Jesus, but the vehicle is broken in the mainline churches. Almost all mainline churches are false teachers.

    • Great. Enthrone something that doesn’t even exist. Might as well have a napkin as a ruler. Wouldn’t be any different.

  • Christians apparently invented the idea that religions have expiration dates. Muslims ran with this idea by claiming that Christianity expired when Muhammad got the next authoritative revelation from god.

    So why should it surprise Christians that their own religion has gone into decline?

    • Christ invented the idea that Judaism was superseded, not Christians. The idea that one day a Messiah would come was present in the Hebrew Bible. That is why the Jews gathered around Jesus; they were waiting for a Messiah who would fulfill the law and lead them into all truth.

      Islam didn’t run with any idea. It’s all made up by one goatfucking man.

      • Many modernized Christians have been fooled into the delusion that Jews recognize Jesus as the son of God.

        • MEANWHILE, THE TALMUD BE LIKE:

          “‘Yashu’ (derogatory for ‘Jesus’) is in Hell being boiled in hot excrement.” (Gittin 57a)
          [’Yashu’ is an acronym for the Jewish curse, ‘May his (Jesus) name be wiped out forevermore.’]
          “Yashu (Jesus) was sexually immoral and worshipped a brick.” (Sanhedrin 107b)
          “Yashu (Jesus) was cut off from the Jewish people for his wickedness and refused to repent.” (Sotah 47a)
          “Miriam the hairdresser (the virgin Mary) had sex with many men.” (Shabbath 104b, Hebrew Edition only)
          “She who was the descendant of princes and governors (the virgin Mary) played the harlot (whore) with carpenters.” (Sanhedrin 106a)
          “Christians who reject the Talmud will go to hell and be punished there for all generations.” (Rosh Hashanah 17a)
          “‘Goyim’ prefer sex with cows.” (Abodah Zarah 22a-22b)

    • Christianity didn’t invent the idea. It probably revived it from mythology and applied to their contemporary world. There are many examples of a mythological figure who comes in and re-orders the value system of a society. Nietzshe references Zoaster/Zarathustra but he’s very much an archetypal figure.

      The attempts of this kind of transvaluation happen frequently and rarely stick. Judaism is probably one of the few examples of a mythological tradition that claims continuity throughout because of their retconning of their own mythology. Fundamental alterations to their religious practice occurs but the contemporary teaching will reflect that the past is more or less like the present in terms of values and beliefs, and as such leaving very little record of what the evolution of their beliefs actually looked like.

      At the time of Christ it appears that the Pharisees were self-aware of this problem and attempted to resolve it with their own proto-Talmudic “Logic” which would require their own trangressive transvaluation of values which ultimately backfired when a great many Hebrew pleb decided they could also play that game and adopt a new value system which obviated the current priesthood.

      Christianity in preserving “every jot and tittle” of the Torah could be seen as a conservative backlash against the establishment’s belief in their right to formally retcon the recorded myths of the Jewish people at a whim. Of course we see a rural versus urban, Low Church versus High Church kind of divide as the pleb would have believed the Torah to be literally true but the highly educated, erudite and studious priests would have been aware that the Torah was already highly retconned by previous generations of priests. The latter group still believing in the divinity of God and the providential rightness of their ancestors came up with a sort of Divine Right of Priests which placed them as co-equal with God in authorship of the Truth. We eventually see it codified in the Talmud where the Rabbi is determined to actually be the intellectual superior of God.

Leave a Reply